1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to chassis, or frame, for a gliding sport element such as an in-line roller skate or an ice skate, and a gliding sport element, such as an in-line or ice skate, including such a chassis.
2. Description of Background and Relevant Information
A chassis of the aforementioned type must ensure the linkage between the gliding member(s) themselves, namely the skate blade, wheels, or rollers, and the user's foot.
The chassis is therefore generally constituted by a support surface that is capable of receiving the boot of the athlete, and by one or two lateral flanges adapted to receive the wheels, rollers, or the blade of the skate.
The chassis must also have substantial characteristics of mechanical resistance while being as light as possible, to avoid the forces imposed by the athlete from being too substantial.
Furthermore, the increasing technicality of these gliding sport elements, especially for in-line roller skates, further increases the conflicting requirements which must be met by the skate chassis, namely:
The techniques used in manufacturing the currently known chassis do not make it possible to meet all of these requirements, while maintaining a reasonable manufacturing cost.
Indeed, the oldest manufacturing technique consists of making such chassis from a U-shaped folded or bent metal sheet, as disclosed in the patent document DE 10 33 569, for example.
Such a manufacturing principle, while inexpensive, does not, however, make it possible to obtain a large variety of forms, nor a chassis with substantial mechanical strength, unless the thickness of the metal sheet, and therefore the weight thereof, are substantially increased.
Another commonly used technique consists of making the chassis by molding from a synthetic, or metallic, material. Molding offers the advantage of allowing various forms, but it also has numerous disadvantages:
Chassis made of composite fibers are also known. These chassis can indeed be made in almost all possible forms, but their manufacture is extremely expensive and difficult to industrialize. Furthermore, while such chassis are extremely rigid, they lack flexibility and are therefore fragile and “uncomfortable.”
Finally, U.S. Pat. No. 5,388,846 has proposed to make a chassis for ice skates or roller skates from a profiled metallic bar whose transverse cross section corresponds to the general section desired for the chassis, the final form of the chassis being obtained after machining with removal of material.
Such a manufacturing method is also very expensive, due to the necessary machining period and the quantity of material to be removed. It does not allow for a great freedom with respect to the form or profile of the chassis.
An object of the present invention is to remedy the aforementioned drawbacks and to provide an improved chassis for a gliding sport element, as well as a gliding sport element, such as an in-line skate, employing such improved chassis, which resolves the various aforementioned problems and, in particular, to reconcile the characteristics of mechanical strength or resistance, adaptability, flexibility, lightness, and a low manufacturing cost.
The chassis of the gliding element according to the invention is made by cutting from a metallic flank or sheet a form corresponding substantially the developed, or completed, form of at least one portion of the chassis, and providing at least one stiffening rib by pressing such portion of the chassis.
Indeed, stiffening the chassis by means of one or more stiffening ribs by pressing enables, at equal weight with respect to a chassis merely obtained by bending, a substantial increase in the characteristics of rigidity and resistance to deformation due, on the one hand, to the presence of such ribs, but also to the localized work hardening of the material obtained in the area of such ribs related to the manufacturing method by pressing.
Depending on the desired results, one can provide each rib to extend substantially along the entire length of the flange of the chassis, or only over a limited central zone of each flange, or yet in the area of the ends of each flange.
The invention will be better understood and other characteristics will become apparent along the description that follows, with reference to the annexed schematic drawing showing, by way of non-limiting examples, a plurality of embodiments of the chassis, and in which:
a is a view, similar to
As shown in
Each of the platforms 3, 4, or foot-bearing portions of the chassis, constitutes a support surface capable of receiving the boot of the athlete, the latter (not shown in the drawing) being fixed by any known means, especially glue, rivets, screws, etc., but it can also be fixed removably by non-permanent connection means.
One will also note that the platforms 3, 4 are distinct and separated from one another by a cut-out 5, and they are located at different levels in height, the front platform 4 being lower than the rear platform 3, to take into account the natural position of the athlete, in which the heel is slightly raised.
Each flange 2 has an elongated form that is bent in an arc of a circle in the longitudinal direction.
Holes 6 for the attachment of the rollers or the skate blade, as the case may be, are provided at the lower end of each flange.
Each hole 6 is made in a cylindrical boss 7 that can be made by die forging. The holes 6 located correspondingly in the two flanges are coaxial.
Each flange 2 further has a pressed rib 8 that extends substantially along the entire length of the flange 2, above the attachment holes 6, and has a generally arched shape.
Each of the transversely spaced apart medial and lateral flanges 2 includes a bottom portion, generally at which the wheels or gliding blade is to be attached, and a top portion adjacent to the foot-bearing portions. The top and bottom portions of each of the flanges are substantially coplanar and, in a particular embodiment, the top portions of the medial and lateral flanges are spaced apart by a distance equal to that by which the bottom portions of the medial and lateral flanges are spaced apart. Further, it can be considered that each of the medial and lateral flanges includes an intermediate portion between the top and bottom portions, preferably made by pressing. In a particular embodiment, the intermediate portions can be substantially non-coplanar with the bottom portions of the respective flanges.
As shown particularly in
Furthermore, the rib 8 has a longitudinal extent that varies in vertical position and extends other than along a single straight line along the entirety of its length. In the particular illustrated embodiment, each rib 8 preferably follows the contour of the flanges 1, 2, on which it is pressed and therefore has, in this case, an elongated form which is also slightly curved continuously in the longitudinal direction, a center portion being relatively raised, i.e., at a higher elevation, with respect to a straight line connecting opposite end portions.
As shown in the embodiment of
Such a pressed rib 8 provide the flange, on which it is obtained, a substantial increase in the moment of inertia and of the resistance to deformation both in the longitudinal and vertical directions, this increase being related not only to the presence of each rib 8 and to the shape thereof, but also to the work hardening of the material in the rib area during the pressing operation.
Such a construction and manufacturing concept practically make it possible to divide in two the thickness and therefore, the weight, of the metal sheet used to make the chassis with respect to a bent, molded, or profiled chassis, while maintaining, or even increasing, the mechanical characteristics.
This method results in an extremely light, resistant, and inexpensive chassis.
Advantageously, the chassis will be made from laminated metal sheet whose fibers are oriented along the longitudinal direction of the chassis. Such a characteristic also makes it possible to increase the resistance qualities of the chassis in the longitudinal direction, especially with respect to a chassis made of an injected or cast alloy in which there is no formation of fibers.
Furthermore, it is possible to modify the moment of inertia of the chassis by providing appropriate cut-outs such as 5, 9. As shown, these cut-outs are perimetric, i.e., they are through holes that are completely contained within the outer boundaries of the chassis.
In the present case, the cut-out 9, which is oval and arranged centrally beneath the rib 8, makes it possible to reduce the flexional stiffness of each flange 2 in the central zone of the chassis and, in combination with the cut-out 5 which also arranged centrally, also makes it possible to reduce the flexional stiffness of the entire chassis in this zone. In the embodiment of
Such a chassis can be obtained very simply and in a single piece from a metal sheet in a succession of steps, such as the following:
Of course, the series of operations described above only applies if the chassis is made in a single piece from the same metallic sheet.
The chassis can also be made in a plurality of portions assembled by any known means, such as screws, rivets, welds, etc.
More particularly, as shown in
With respect to an aluminum chassis made of an alloy obtained by injection during molding, such a manufacturing technique by pressing, and possibly by die forging, bending, is much more precise, does not require any subsequent machining, and makes it possible to have a greater selection of material, with more interesting characteristics. Indeed, the number of available materials for injection or molding is very limited, and these materials are generally brittle and do not promote the formation of fibers.
Moreover, since the molding and injection techniques are not sufficiently precise, time-consuming, and expensive additional machining would be necessary to obtain the holes for attaching the gliding member(s), for example.
One will also note that the geometrical properties of a pressed chassis are clearly greater than those of a chassis made out of plastic materials, in which, due to the shrinking of the material, one is confronted with the phenomena of twisting and alignment of the wheels' attachment holes, thereby requiring additional machining.
By way of example, the necessary periods to produce a chassis using the various techniques can be assessed as follows:
Therefore, one notes the triple gain, in terms of the manufacturing time and cost, characteristics of the material and lightness, that is made by using the technique according to the invention.
Another extremely advantageous characteristic of the pressing technique resides in the fact that the possibilities in terms of design are greater than those of the aluminum profile that does not allow any embossing or form on the sheets of the profile which are necessarily planar.
Furthermore, the method and construction according to the invention offer greater possibilities in varying the moment of inertia of the chassis along the longitudinal axis thereof, by providing adapted ribs, cut-outs, or heights of the sheets, in order to obtain a deformation of the chassis and an optimum behavior of the chassis as a function of the desired practice.
Thus, the chassis described with reference to
The chassis 10 shown in
The chassis 10 further has a form that is clearly curved in a arc of a circle.
Each flange 12 has at each end a cut-out 15 as well as a perimetric narrowing 14 providing it with flexibility and a low moment of inertia in these zones.
Conversely, each flange 12 is provided in its median zone with two superimposed pressed ribs 18, 19. Inasmuch as rib 19 has a relatively short length, i.e., relative to the rib 18, e.g., it might be better regarded as a boss, or an elongated or non-circular boss.
Such a chassis therefore has a very substantial rigidity in the center, in the zone of ribs 18, 19, and relatively flexible ends.
The chassis 20 shown in
Such a chassis will therefore be very rigid at the rear, very flexible in the center, and moderately rigid at the front.
Each of the ribs 8, 18, and 28 of the examples of the invention described above extends longitudinally at a variable height relative to a line that connects the opposite ends of the ribs. Further, each of the ribs 8, 18, and 28 is downwardly curved.
In the case of
Therefore, such a chassis has particularly homogeneous characteristics of torsional and flexional rigidity along its entire length, the only more flexible zones being defined at the front and rear by scallops 34.
Finally,
A simple pressing of each internal rib 49 is also possible.
The present invention is not limited to the particulars of the examples described hereinabove. It can apply to any chassis for any sport element that must meet the same requirements.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
95 13707 | Nov 1995 | FR | national |
This application is a continuation of application Ser. No. 09/377,841, filed on Aug. 20, 1999, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,293,563, issued on Sep. 25, 2001, which is a division of application Ser. No. 08/736,995, filed on Oct. 25, 1996, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,301,771, issued on Oct. 16, 2001, the disclosures of which are hereby incorporated by reference thereto in its entirety and the priority of which is claimed under 35 USC 120. This application is also based upon French application No. 95.13707, filed on Nov. 14, 1995, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference thereto in its entirety and priority of which is hereby claimed under 35 USC 119.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
275483 | Gregg | Apr 1883 | A |
875165 | Faust et al. | Dec 1907 | A |
1294984 | Ware | Feb 1919 | A |
1728629 | Sahlmann | Sep 1929 | A |
1807890 | Berger | Jun 1931 | A |
1977587 | MacDonnell | Oct 1934 | A |
2291600 | Atkinson | Aug 1942 | A |
2531357 | Foulds | Nov 1950 | A |
3877710 | Nyitrai | Apr 1975 | A |
4058324 | Dallaire | Nov 1977 | A |
4273345 | Ben-Dor et al. | Jun 1981 | A |
5048848 | Olson et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5326115 | Seltzer | Jul 1994 | A |
5388846 | Gierveld | Feb 1995 | A |
5456477 | Bourdeau | Oct 1995 | A |
5560625 | Kuykendall | Oct 1996 | A |
5735536 | Myers et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5810369 | Wilder et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5848796 | Meibock et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5913526 | Olson et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5964537 | Hill, Jr. | Oct 1999 | A |
6053512 | Chang | Apr 2000 | A |
6293563 | Benoit | Sep 2001 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
105264 | Jun 1924 | CH |
1033569 | Jul 1958 | DE |
0043250 | Jan 1982 | EP |
495821 | Oct 1919 | FR |
943511 | Mar 1949 | FR |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20020014750 A1 | Feb 2002 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 08736995 | Oct 1996 | US |
Child | 09377841 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 09377841 | Aug 1999 | US |
Child | 09941643 | US |