The invention relates generally to check handling systems and more particularly to an improved check carrier for use in such systems.
It will be appreciated that millions of checks, both commercial and retail, are presented to financial institutions for posting and debiting every day. Each of these checks must be processed by the receiving financial institution and presented to a clearing bank with some checks processed by multiple institutions. Because of the volume of checks handled every day, the processing of checks is typically automated where high speed sorters automatically, read, sort and process the checks based on the MICR (magnetic ink character recognition) code printed on the bottom of the checks. A typical sorter will process 2,500 checks per minute.
Moreover, the Check Truncation Act (Check 21), intended to minimize the disruption of the nation's check collection and forwarding process by eliminating the national check clearing system that relies on paper-processing and physical transport, allows financial institutions to generate substitute image checks, or image replacement documents (IRD's), that have the same legal status as an original check. The IRD's can be sent as images between financial institutions and are treated the same as the original paper document. Again because of the high volume of checks processed each day, checks are scanned in high speed automated scanning equipment to create the IRD's.
Different institutions and different processes may utilize paper documents, IRD's or both. Even when paper documents are physically transferred they must be convertible into IRD's because the receiving institution may want to store the document as an IRD or transfer the document as an IRD to another institution for further processing. Because financial institutions require that checks be scanned into IRD's and/or processed as paper documents, virtually all checks are at some point scanned, processed and/or sorted by a high speed automated process.
When a check is damaged from tearing, folding or the like, the structural integrity of the check may be such that it cannot be put through the automated sorting and scanning equipment. To facilitate the automated processing of damaged checks, check carriers have been developed that hold the check for processing. Known check carriers do not securely retain the check. As a result checks can become separated from the carriers resulting in loss of the check or delay in processing. Additionally, current check carriers do not meet the image quality requirements set forth by the Federal Reserve. As a result financial institutions have been required to forward items in check carriers on a separate cash letter causing additional processing delays. Moreover, known check carriers do not reliably retain the check in a manner where the check can be automatically scanned, sorted and processed while in the carrier. Since existing check carriers do not provide an acceptable image of the front and back of the item, particularly an image of the financial institution's endorsement on the back of the item, financial institutions run the risk of financial loss and additional fees because of the inability to present a clear substitute IRD for clearing.
Thus an improved check carrier that securely retains the check in a manner where it can be easily and accurately scanned, to provide an acceptable image quality and be processed and sorted by automated equipment, is desired.
An example embodiment of the check carrier of the invention consists of an envelope of transparent material that is dimensioned to closely conform to the dimensions of a standard check. Because checks typically come in a standard commercial size and a different standard retail size, it is contemplated that multiple sized carriers may be used, each dimensioned to be used with a particular size check. The back of the check carrier may include an endorsement window through which a bank or other financial institution can apply its endorsement stamp directly to the check. In one embodiment, the endorsement window is covered by a removable cover that is removed if an endorsement stamp needs to be applied to the check. The bottom of the check carrier may be provided with an area for receiving the MICR printing such that the MICR can be read directly off of the carrier. In one embodiment, the area for receiving the MICR is removable from the body of the check carrier. The open end of the check carrier is sealed by a reuseable closure mechanism such as a repositionable adhesive. The adhesive can also be used interior of the check carrier such that the adhesive contacts the check to fix the check within the carrier.
Referring to
At the bottom edge 6 the front panel 2 and back panel 4 are joined by adhesive, sonic welding or the like to create a flat MICR area 18 that can receive the MICR printing 20. MICR area 18 could also be created during the extrusion process for the front and back panels. MICR stands for Magnetic Ink Character Recognition, and is used to describe the special numbers and symbols found at the bottom of checks, and the technology and processes to produce and analyze these characters. In order to sort checks the MICR must be accessible to the character recognition equipment. Therefore, if a check is to be sorted while in the check carrier, the MICR printing from that check is duplicated on the MICR area 18 of check carrier 1. This allows the check carrier to be read as if it was the actual paper check.
The interior 12 of check carrier 1 is dimensioned to closely receive a standard size check, such that movement of the check 14 within the carrier is limited. Because checks come in at least two standard sizes, retail and commercial, it is contemplated that the check carrier 1 will be come in various sizes where the interior size and shape of the carrier corresponds to the size and shape of the check to be carried. In one embodiment the length and width of the interior 12 are approximately 8.75 inches by 3.75 inches for standard-size business checks and 6.25 inches by 3.0 inches for personal checks.
The front panel 2 may be made of a non-shiny, translucent paper-plastic blend of sturdy construction. The back panel may be made of non-shiny, translucent paper blend similar to tissue paper. Both the front panel and back panel may be porous so as to be able to absorb ink such as for the MICR printing. The use of translucent material for both the front and back of the check carrier allows the automated scanning, sorting and processing equipment to optically access the front and back of the check. The terms “optically access” and “optically accessible” are used to encompass any process where the check is scanned or processed based on a process that relies on light or vision. Other material may be used provided that the material is translucent or transparent and the check carrier is rigid enough to support a check but thin and flexible enough that it can be processed by the sorting and scanning equipment typically used by financial institutions.
A closure mechanism is used for releasably sealing opening 16. In one embodiment the closure mechanism comprises repositionable adhesive 20 such as tacky elastomeric microspheres located along the length thereof for sealing the carrier closed after the check is placed therein. Repositionable adhesives are designed to be reuseable such that the mating surfaces can be repeatedly adhered together and separated. It will be appreciated that the adhesive could also be placed on the front panel. Other closure mechanisms such as a zip lock could also be used provided that opening 16 can be repeatedly closed and reopened. In one embodiment, the repositionable adhesive 20 is placed on the inside surface of either one or both of the front and rear panels such that the adhesive is in contact with check 14 when the check is placed in the carrier. The repositionable adhesive 20 serves to maintain the check in position relative to the carrier but allows the check 14 to be removed from the carrier if desired and thus causes the check and carrier to blend into one document.
The back panel 4 includes a window 26 formed therein that allows access to the back of the check. Window 26 allows a financial institution to place its endorsement stamp directly on check 14 without removing the check from the carrier. A peel off cover 28 having thumb tab 30 is provided to cover window 26 when not in use. In one embodiment cover 28 is releaseably secured to the back panel using repositionable adhesive at area 31.
Referring to
As previously described with respect to the embodiment shown in
The operation of the check carrier of the invention will be described with reference to
While embodiments of the invention are disclosed herein, various changes and modifications can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. The scope of the invention is indicated in the appended claims, and all changes that come within the meaning and range of equivalents are intended to be embraced therein.
This application is a continuation application of co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/739,303, filed Apr. 24, 2007, which is a continuation application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/307,668, filed Feb. 16, 2006, now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 7,225,975, the contents of U.S. patent application Ser. Nos. 11/739,303 and 11/307,668 are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3043506 | Bremer | Jul 1962 | A |
3111257 | Peach | Nov 1963 | A |
3112151 | Buros | Nov 1963 | A |
3363917 | Gunderson et al. | Jan 1968 | A |
3431404 | Brink | Mar 1969 | A |
3576972 | Wood et al. | May 1971 | A |
3586834 | Dykaar et al. | Jun 1971 | A |
3588456 | McNabb | Jun 1971 | A |
3593913 | Bremer | Jul 1971 | A |
3642191 | Roof | Feb 1972 | A |
3666926 | Conte, Jr. et al. | May 1972 | A |
3692233 | Carter, Jr. | Sep 1972 | A |
3693869 | Eaves, Jr. | Sep 1972 | A |
3702924 | Wood et al. | Nov 1972 | A |
3770943 | Sill | Nov 1973 | A |
3800124 | Walsh | Mar 1974 | A |
3856332 | Snedeker | Dec 1974 | A |
3861718 | Strus | Jan 1975 | A |
3897299 | Crouse et al. | Jul 1975 | A |
3955609 | Siegel | May 1976 | A |
4047661 | Klein | Sep 1977 | A |
4060711 | Buros | Nov 1977 | A |
4105319 | Wells et al. | Aug 1978 | A |
4128202 | Buros | Dec 1978 | A |
4136471 | Austin | Jan 1979 | A |
4205780 | Burns et al. | Jun 1980 | A |
4278880 | Buros | Jul 1981 | A |
4615480 | Powell | Oct 1986 | A |
4644144 | Chandek et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
4776510 | Jenkins | Oct 1988 | A |
4927071 | Wood | May 1990 | A |
4934587 | McNabb | Jun 1990 | A |
5039000 | Ashby | Aug 1991 | A |
5044668 | Wright | Sep 1991 | A |
5049118 | McNabb | Sep 1991 | A |
5052613 | Lin | Oct 1991 | A |
5062570 | Ashby | Nov 1991 | A |
5126547 | Norman, Jr. | Jun 1992 | A |
5180901 | Hiramatsu | Jan 1993 | A |
5184910 | Betsill | Feb 1993 | A |
5251810 | Kim | Oct 1993 | A |
5271553 | Kim | Dec 1993 | A |
5276311 | Hennige | Jan 1994 | A |
5316208 | Petkovsek | May 1994 | A |
5347302 | Simonoff | Sep 1994 | A |
5411201 | Petkovsek | May 1995 | A |
5419588 | Wood | May 1995 | A |
5623552 | Lane | Apr 1997 | A |
5713511 | Diamond | Feb 1998 | A |
5738274 | Stude | Apr 1998 | A |
5807457 | Norman et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5882038 | Ong | Mar 1999 | A |
5894986 | Lederman et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5954431 | Fabel | Sep 1999 | A |
6148550 | Niedfeld | Nov 2000 | A |
6155481 | Rawlings | Dec 2000 | A |
6325285 | Baratelli | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6347812 | Herman | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6423390 | Harden | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6435404 | Feick | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6478229 | Epstein | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6557748 | Bethke | May 2003 | B2 |
6898299 | Brooks | May 2005 | B1 |
6925565 | Black | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6957766 | Das et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6983882 | Cassone | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7225975 | Cantley et al. | Jun 2007 | B1 |
7363504 | Bonalle et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7461773 | Updike et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7717329 | Cantley et al. | May 2010 | B1 |
7721943 | Perrone et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
20010047331 | Malanga et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020020735 | Hollingbery et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020030093 | Kim | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020149196 | Fabel | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030080550 | Phillips | May 2003 | A1 |
20030121962 | Hamblin | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20040050919 | Calonje et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040066032 | Fabel et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040195822 | Fabel et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040256444 | Becker | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050129300 | Sandison et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050145682 | Auchter et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050179255 | Olson | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050184140 | DeLa Vergne | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050230458 | Kranz | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050252955 | Sugai et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060102704 | Reynders et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20070114785 | Porter | May 2007 | A1 |
20070156438 | Popadic et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20080063253 | Wood | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080120509 | Simon | May 2008 | A1 |
20100170945 | Cantley et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100250418 | Schrick et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100170945 A1 | Jul 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11739303 | Apr 2007 | US |
Child | 12727015 | US | |
Parent | 11307668 | Feb 2006 | US |
Child | 11739303 | US |