1. Field of Invention
The present invention generally relates valves and, in particular, to check valves that may be used to allow fluid to flow in one direction and prevent fluid from flowing in an opposite direction.
2. Description of Related Art
Conventional check valves are devices that allow gases, liquids or other fluids to flow in one direction. In particular, conventional check valves allow fluid to flow in a desired direction when sufficient pressure or force acts on the check valve. Conventional check valves, however, prevent fluid from flowing through the valve in an undesired direction. Specifically, when these pressures and forces are such that the flow of the fluid would be in the undesired direction, the check valve automatically closes resulting in the stopping or checking of the flow in this undesired direction.
Some known check valves use a flexible membrane that functions as a diaphragm. This diaphragm is designed to deform or bend in order to allow flow of fluid in a desired direction. This diaphragm may also return to its original position in order to prevent flow in the opposite direction.
Check valves have a positive pressure differential when there is greater pressure upstream from the check valve, in the desired direction of flow, than there is downstream from the check valve. In contrast, check valves have a negative pressure differential when there is greater pressure downstream from the check valve than there is upstream. If a positive pressure differential exists and it is sufficient in its magnitude, then the diaphragm may bend to create a space or passage through which fluid can flow through the check valve in the desired direction. The minimum pressure, or pressure differential, required to open a check valve is sometimes referred to as the cracking pressure. If no pressure differential or a negative pressure differential exists, or if a positive pressure differential exists but is insufficient in magnitude, then the diaphragm will prevent the flow of fluid through the check valve. In particular, the diaphragm will bend or deflect from its original or normal position to allow fluid to flow when there is a sufficient positive pressure differential. When there is no longer a sufficient positive pressure differential, then the diaphragm will return to its original or normal position to prevent flow though the valve.
Known check valves often have several shortcomings. For instance, some conventional check valves have a high cracking pressure. That is, these check valves require a large positive pressure differential before they will open. Disadvantageously, a check valve with an undesirably high cracking pressure will prevent flow in the desired direction even through the relative forces and pressures would normally allow this desired flow. Furthermore, some conventional check valves do not close until a relatively large negative pressure differential exists. A check valve that requires a substantial negative pressure differential to close may allow an undesirable or unacceptable amount of back flow, or flow contrary to the desired direction, when negative pressure differential of a small magnitude exists.
Additionally, some conventional check valves have components or structures that interfere with or resist the flow of fluid in the desired direction when the check valve is open. These known check valves that add resistance to the flow of fluid in the desired direction may undesirably decrease the efficiency of the system. Furthermore, some conventional check valves may leak when the valve is open, allowing some of the fluid to proceed or flow in a direction contrary to the desired direction.
Some conventional check valves may also produce noises as they open and close or when they leak. In some applications, the noise may be very undesirable and disconcerting. Furthermore, many known check valves are not aesthetically pleasing in their design. In addition, some known check valves have a large size and/or may be difficult to manufacture. For example, some conventional check valves may include components that have to be manufactured to relatively tight tolerances and interconnected in a very careful and meticulous manner.
Further, some conventional check valves have a complex design with a number of parts and components. Disadvantageously, the complex design may make the check valve more difficult and costly to manufacture. Conventional check valves with a complex design may also be more difficult to clean, maintain, repair and replace. Additionally, the complex design and numerous parts of some known check valves may be more prone to failure.
A need therefore exists for a check valve that eliminates the above-described disadvantages and problems.
One aspect is a check valve that may have a relatively low cracking pressure. Thus, the check valve may open to allow fluid flow in the desired direction when there is a positive pressure differential, even if the magnitude of the positive pressure differential is small.
Another aspect is a check valve that may prevent undesirable back flow through the valve. For example, the check valve may either entirely or within reasonable tolerances prevent back flow through the valve.
Still another aspect is a check valve that may not leak when it is in the closed position. That is, when the check valve is closed, it may prevent any fluid from flowing through the valve.
Yet another aspect is a check valve that may include a membrane or diaphragm. The membrane or diaphragm may be sized and configured to provide little or no resistance or interference to the flow of fluid through the valve in the desired direction.
A further aspect is a check valve which may be relatively quiet in its operation. Advantageously, this may allow the check valve to be used in a wide variety of situations and environments.
A still further aspect is a check valve which may be aesthetically pleasing in its design. In addition, the check valve may have a rather straight-forward design, which may allow it to be easily and efficiently manufactured, maintained and cleaned.
Still yet another aspect is a check valve that may be manufactured within a relatively wide range of tolerances. Significantly, the wide range of manufacturing tolerances may allow the valve to be economically manufactured. In addition, the check valve may have a low failure rate.
A further aspect is a check valve that may include a substantially flexible membrane and a substantially rigid portion. The substantially flexible membrane may be generally dome shaped and may act as a diaphragm. The substantially flexible membrane may also flex or deform in order to open the check valve. The substantially rigid portion may also be generally dome shaped and may include a surface against which the substantially flexible membrane may touch or contact. The substantially rigid portion may be sized and configured to help position and/or control the movement of the substantially flexible membrane. For example, the substantially rigid portion may be sized and configured to help close or seal the check valve. The substantially rigid portion may also help provide structural support to the substantially flexible membrane.
A still further aspect is a check valve that may include a substantially flexible membrane with a sealing edge or outer edge at its periphery and a substantially rigid portion with a sealing ring. The substantially flexible membrane may be naturally biased so that its outer edge may tend to press up against the sealing ring of the substantially rigid portion. When the outer edge of the substantially flexible membrane contacts or is pressed against the sealing ring of the substantially rigid portion, then the check valve may be closed and fluid may not be able to pass through the check valve. The valve may open when the substantially flexible membrane flexes or bends so that its outer edge separates from the sealing ring of the substantially rigid portion. When this separation occurs, an opening or passage may be created through which fluid may pass.
A yet further aspect is a check valve that may include a substantially flexible membrane which may deform when there is a positive pressure differential of a sufficient magnitude. In particular, the flexible membrane may have a dome shaped configuration with the top of the dome disposed in the direction opposite to the direction of the desired flow. Thus, the fluid may press down on the top of the dome shaped membrane and in on the sides or periphery of the dome shaped membrane when a positive pressure differential exists. If the magnitude of the pressure differential is sufficient, the pressure may cause the sides and/or outer edges of the substantially flexible membrane to move inwardly, thereby creating a gap between the outer edge of the substantially flexible membrane and the sealing ring of the substantially rigid portion. If there is no pressure differential or if the magnitude of the positive pressure differential is insufficient, the outer edge of the substantially flexible membrane may return to its normally biased position in which it preferably contacts the sealing ring of the substantially rigid portion. Additionally, if a negative pressure differential exists, then the fluid may press up on the bottom and out on the sides and outer edge of the substantially flexible membrane. This pressure may push the outer edge of the substantially flexible membrane into contact with the sealing ring of the substantially rigid portion thereby closing the valve. Closing the valve may create a seal so that the fluid may not be able to pass in between the substantially flexible membrane and the substantially rigid portion in a direction opposite the desired direction of flow.
Another aspect is a check valve which may include a substantially flexible membrane with a sealing edge at its periphery and a substantially rigid portion with a sealing ring. Because the outer edge of the substantially flexible membrane may be intended to separate from the sealing ring of the substantially rigid portion, the outer edge of the substantially flexible membrane may not be securely or permanently attached to the sealing ring of the substantially rigid portion. Rather, the substantially flexible membrane may be connected, for example, by its center, to the center of the substantially rigid portion of the check valve. When the check valve is open, fluid may pass through the valve along the valve's edge or periphery rather than through its center.
Still another aspect is a check valve which may include a substantially rigid portion with a plurality of substantially rigid spokes. For example, the spokes may extend from a generally rigid base, which may include the sealing ring, to the center portion of the check valve. These spokes may serve to attach the base to the center portion of the substantially rigid portion. In between each of these spokes may be an opening or gap through which fluid may pass. If the valve is open, the fluid may pass through these openings or gaps and then through the spaces or channels in between the outer edge of the substantially flexible membrane and the sealing ring of the substantially rigid portion.
Still another aspect is a check valve which may include a substantially flexible membrane with a plurality of relatively thin sections and a plurality of relatively thick sections which may be created as integral parts of the substantially flexible membrane. The relatively thick sections may extend from the outer rim of the substantially flexible membrane to the center portion of the substantially flexible membrane and may also resemble spokes. These relatively thick sections may provide structural support to the dome shaped, substantially flexible membrane. Preferably, the substantially flexible membrane may include a plurality of relatively thick sections, equal in number to the number of substantially rigid spokes included in the substantially rigid portion of the check valve. Furthermore, the substantially flexible membrane may be connected to the substantially rigid portion such that each of these relatively thick portions will be located generally in between two of the substantially rigid spokes. The added support provided by the relatively thick sections of the substantially flexible membrane may allow the substantially flexible membrane in general, and the relatively thin sections of the substantially flexible membrane specifically, to be manufactured to be thinner and more flexible. The flexibility of these relatively thin sections may allow the valve to open in the presence of a small positive pressure differential, thereby creating a check valve a very low cracking pressure. The flexibility of these relatively thin sections may also allow the valve to close where there is no pressure differential or a negative pressure differential, which may create a check valve with little or no back flow or leakage.
Still another aspect is a check valve that may include a substantially rigid portion with a plurality of partial spokes. The spokes may extend from a substantially rigid base towards a center portion, but the spokes preferably do not contact the center portion of the substantially rigid portion. The check valve may also include substantially rigid spokes that extend from the base to the center portion. Desirably, one of the partial spokes is placed between each of the substantially rigid spokes. Advantageously, the partial spokes may be sized and configured to add stability to the check valve. For example, the partial spokes may prevent the substantially flexible membrane from being pushed backward and out of contact with the rigid base and sealing ring. In addition, the partial spokes may not significantly obstruct fluid flow through the valve.
These and other aspects, features and advantages of the invention will become more fully apparent from the following detailed description of preferred embodiments and appended claims.
The appended drawings contain figures of preferred embodiments to further clarify the above and other aspects, advantages and features of the invention. It will be appreciated that these drawings depict only preferred embodiments of the invention and are not intended to limit its scope. The invention will be described and explained with additional specificity and detail through the use of the accompanying drawings in which:
It will be readily understood that the components of the present invention, as generally described and illustrated in the Figures herein, could be arranged and designed in a wide variety of different configurations. Thus, the following more detailed description of preferred embodiments is not intended to limit the scope of the invention, as claimed, but it is merely representative of some of the presently preferred embodiments of the present invention.
The present invention is generally directed towards a check valve that may be used in connection with, for example, an inhalation valve for a snorkel and a tracheostomy speaking valve. It will be understood, however, that the check valve may be used in connection with other types of devices and in other suitable environments. For instance, the check valve may be used to regulate the flow of any type of fluid or flowable materials such as air, water, blood and the like. Thus, the check valve may be used with an artificial heart valve, an intravenous valve, an irrigation valve, etc. Accordingly, while the check valve may be discussed below in connection with an inhalation valve for a snorkel or a tracheostomy speaking valve, it will be appreciated that the valve may be used in any suitable situation where it is desired to regulate flow.
Additionally, to assist in the description of the check valve, words such as top, bottom, front, rear, right and left are used to describe the accompanying figures, which are not necessarily drawn to scale. It will be appreciated, however, that the present invention can be located in a variety of desired positions—including various angles, sideways and even upside down. A detailed description of the check valve now follows.
As discussed below and shown in the accompanying figures, the check valve may be used in connection with a snorkel. For example, the check valve may be an inhalation valve for a snorkel and the valve may be placed on the top of a snorkel riser tube. The check valve may open when the user of the snorkel inhales to allow the user of the snorkel to breathe surface air. The valve may then close when the user of the snorkel is not inhaling, as during exhalation or between breaths. When the valve it closed, it may prevent splash water from entering the inhalation tube of the snorkel and may prevent exhaled air from passing back through the inhalation tube thereby channeling it through the proper exhalation tube.
As best seen in
As shown in
In greater detail, as shown in
Still referring now to
The shape and positioning of the substantially rigid spokes 22 preferably creates a generally dome-shaped substantially rigid top cap 12. Advantageously, the generally dome-shaped top cap 12 may better support and mate with the substantially flexible membrane 14, which may also be generally dome shaped. It will be appreciated, however, that the substantially rigid top cap 12 and/or the substantially flexible membrane 14 may have other suitable shapes and configurations.
Still referring to
Still referring to
Still referring to
As mentioned above, one exemplary embodiment of this valve may be used as an inhalation valve for a snorkel. The snorkel which this check valve may be used on may include an exhalation tube within a larger inhalation tube. When the inhalation valve is fit onto this snorkel, the inhalation tube may fit onto or attach to the outer rim 20 of the substantially rigid base 16 of the substantially rigid top cap 12 and the exhalation tube may fit onto or be attached to the center cylinder 30 of the substantially rigid top cap 12. When the inhalation valve is attached to a snorkel in such a manner, the check valve may allow the user to inhale surface air through the inhalation tube only when it is open and only in the check valve's desired direction of flow. Air exhaled through the exhalation tube, however, may be free to move through the check valve, against the check valve's desired direction of flow. It will be understood that this valve could also be used in connection with other devices, structures, environments and the like. Further, this valve could be used in connection with other types of valves and not just check valves.
Although the substantially rigid top cap 12, as shown in
As discussed above and as shown in
Still referring now to
The substantially flexible membrane 14 of the check valve shown in
By employing these relatively thick sections 36 and relatively thin sections 38 of the substantially flexible membrane 14, the overall thickness of the substantially flexible membrane may be decreased without, for example, compromising its structural stability. In addition, the relatively thick sections 36 of the substantially flexible membrane 14 may resist deformation and flexing more than the relatively thin sections 38 of the substantially flexible membrane. Thus, these relatively thick sections 36 may be capable of retaining the check valve's general dome shape and of holding the substantially flexible membrane 14 generally in place against the substantially rigid top cap 12. Significantly, this may help prevent failure of the check valve. The relatively thick sections 36 of the substantially flexible membrane 14 may also allow the relatively thin sections 38 of the substantially flexible membrane 14 to be thinner than the substantially flexible membrane 14 could be were it uniform in thickness.
The relatively thin sections 38 of the substantially flexible membrane 14 may deform or flex more easily than the relatively thick sections 36 of the substantially flexible membrane 14. This allows these relatively thin sections 38 to collapse when the pressure upstream from the check valve is only slightly greater than the pressure downstream from the check valve. This comparatively small pressure differential may cause the sealing edge 34 of the substantially flexible membrane 14 to separate from the sealing ring 18 of the substantially rigid top cap 12 with a relatively small amount of force or pressure. Accordingly, the relatively thin sections 38 may substantially reduce the cracking pressure of the check valve. It will be appreciated that the relatively thick sections 36 and relatively thin sections 38 of the substantially flexible membrane 14 could have other suitable shapes and configurations depending, for example, upon the intended use of the check valve.
As best seen in
Although the substantially flexible membrane 14 of the check valve shown in the accompanying figures includes a downwardly extending, hollow sleeve 40 to attach the substantially flexible membrane 14 to the substantially rigid portion 12 of the check valve, those of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that other structures may be used to achieve this same result. For instance, if the center cylinder 30 of the substantially rigid portion 12 of the check valve extends upwardly rather than downwardly, the substantially flexible membrane 14 may use an upwardly extending post that fits inside of the upwardly extending center cylinder. Similarly, if the substantially rigid portion 12 of the check valve includes a hole through its center portion 24 rather than a downwardly extending center cylinder 30, the substantially flexible membrane 14 may include a button or other protrusion which fits in or extends through this hole in order to attach the substantially flexible membrane 14 to the substantially rigid portion 12. A mechanical fastener, such as a rivet or screw, may also be used to attach the substantially flexible membrane 14 to the substantially rigid portion 12 of the check valve. Accordingly, other suitable devices or structures may be used to attach the substantially flexible membrane 14 to the substantially rigid portion 12 of the check valve.
Referring now to
In operation, when a positive pressure differential is applied to the check valve 10, the collapse zones 38 of the substantially flexible membrane 14 may initially collapse and separate at least a portion of the sealing edge 34 from the sealing ring 18 of the substantially rigid top cap 12. This may allow any suitable type of fluid to flow through the check valve. Depending upon the pressure differential, at least a portion of the substantially flexible spokes 36 may also separate from the sealing edge 34 from the sealing ring 18 of the substantially rigid top cap 12. Because the collapse zones 38 may deform or flex more than the substantially flexible spokes 36, the substantially flexible membrane 14 may generally resemble an umbrella. Thus, when the check valve is in the open position, the collapse zones 38 may bend or deform more than the substantially flexible spokes 36, which may give the substantially flexible membrane 14 the look of a closed or collapsed umbrella.
Advantageously, because only one collapse zone 38 need collapse in order to allow flow through the check valve, the size and configuration of the collapse zones 38 and/or substantially flexible spokes 36 may be manipulated to control the desired amount of fluid flow. For example, if the substantially flexible membrane 14 is manufactured so that the relatively thin sections 38 of the substantially flexible membrane 14 are generally consistent in thickness, then the collapse zones 38 may collapse at generally the same time and/or rate. On the other hand, the thickness of the relatively thick sections 36 and/or the relatively thin sections 38 may be varied according to the desired use of the check valve. For instance, if substantial flow is needed or desired through the check valve, all collapse zones 38 may collapse even if the positive pressure differential is rather small.
As mentioned above, the check valve may also be a tracheostomy speaking valve. This tracheostomy speaking valve can be placed in the tracheostomy of a patient who, for instance, has an obstruction in his or her upper trachea which may interfere with normal breathing. This check valve may normally be in the closed position, but may opens when the patient inhales in order to allow air to enter the lungs through the traechea, possibly bypassing an obstruction. After the inspiration, the valve may close again. This may prevent air, exhaled or otherwise from leaking out of the tracheostomy speaking valve. Because exhaled air may not be able to leak out through the tracheostomy speaking valve, it may be forced further up the patient's trachea where it can pass the patient's vocal cords thereby allowing him or her to speak.
The tracheostomy speaking valve may be similar in many ways to the previously discussed inhalation valve for a snorkel. For example, the substantially rigid portion 12 of this exemplary embodiment illustrated in
In greater detail, as shown in
As shown in
Still referring to
The center post 44 of the tracheostomy speaking valve may also include a barb 46 at its lower end. This barb 46 may be sized and configured to contact the sleeve 40 of the substantially flexible membrane 14 in order to keep the substantially flexible membrane 14 connected to and in position relative to the substantially rigid portion 12 of the tracheostomy speaking valve. More specifically, the barb 46 may prevent the sleeve 40 of the substantially flexible membrane 14 from accidentally sliding off of the center post 44 of the substantially rigid portion 12.
Referring now to
As shown in
The slit 48 may serve to act as a pressure release in cases where there is a negative pressure differential of an undesirable or dangerous magnitude. For instance, the tracheostomy speaking valve may allow inhaled air through but prevents exhaled air from passing out. If, however, the patient using this tracheostomy speaking valve coughs, the force of the cough may damage the valve or could force the entire valve assembly out of its proper position within the throat of the patient. The slit 48, if properly sized and positioned, may allow some equalization of pressures in cases of an excessive, negative pressure differential without causing any significant leaking or backflow. It will be understood that any appropriate number and arrangement of slits 48 may be utilized depending, for example, upon the intended use of the tracheostomy speaking valve. It will also be understood that the slit 48 is not required.
Although this invention has been described in terms of certain preferred embodiments, other embodiments apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art are also within the scope of this invention. Accordingly, the scope of the invention is intended to be defined only by the claims which follow.
This application claims priority to and the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/683,477, entitled VALVES, BAFFLES, SHORTENED SNORKELS, STEALTH SNORKELS, SNORKEL EQUIPMENT COMBINED WITH SCUBA EQUIPMENT, which was filed on May 21, 2005, and is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2859771 | Blagg | Nov 1958 | A |
3473561 | Svenson et al. | Oct 1969 | A |
3860042 | Green | Jan 1975 | A |
3911949 | Hilden et al. | Oct 1975 | A |
3949780 | Buckman | Apr 1976 | A |
3993060 | Mitchell | Nov 1976 | A |
4032106 | Schieser et al. | Jun 1977 | A |
4066077 | Shamlian | Jan 1978 | A |
4071024 | Blanc | Jan 1978 | A |
4137935 | Snowdon | Feb 1979 | A |
4143853 | Abramson | Mar 1979 | A |
4230240 | Laauwe | Oct 1980 | A |
4278080 | Schuch | Jul 1981 | A |
4344427 | Marvin | Aug 1982 | A |
4523610 | Orrico | Jun 1985 | A |
4562836 | Perron | Jan 1986 | A |
4610246 | Delphia | Sep 1986 | A |
4655212 | Delphia | Apr 1987 | A |
4708135 | Arkema | Nov 1987 | A |
4731075 | Gallo Mezo et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4782830 | Forman | Nov 1988 | A |
4793341 | Arasmith | Dec 1988 | A |
4805610 | Hunt | Feb 1989 | A |
4832013 | Hartdom | May 1989 | A |
4834084 | Walsh | May 1989 | A |
4860739 | Vandepol | Aug 1989 | A |
4862903 | Campbell | Sep 1989 | A |
4872453 | Christianson | Oct 1989 | A |
4877022 | Christianson | Oct 1989 | A |
4878491 | McGilvray, III | Nov 1989 | A |
4879995 | Christianson | Nov 1989 | A |
4884564 | Lamont | Dec 1989 | A |
4896664 | Harayama | Jan 1990 | A |
4907582 | Meyerrose | Mar 1990 | A |
4938259 | Schmidt | Jul 1990 | A |
4946133 | Johnson et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
5020191 | Uke | Jun 1991 | A |
5101818 | Chace | Apr 1992 | A |
5117817 | Lin | Jun 1992 | A |
5129426 | Boehmer | Jul 1992 | A |
5143059 | Delphia | Sep 1992 | A |
5199422 | Rasocha | Apr 1993 | A |
5231982 | Harrison et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5245997 | Bartos | Sep 1993 | A |
5261396 | Faulconer et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5265591 | Ferguson | Nov 1993 | A |
5267556 | Feng | Dec 1993 | A |
5271432 | Gueret | Dec 1993 | A |
5280785 | Fujima | Jan 1994 | A |
5297545 | Infante | Mar 1994 | A |
5327849 | Miller | Jul 1994 | A |
5357654 | Hsing-Chi | Oct 1994 | A |
5381563 | Isabelle et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5398673 | Lambert | Mar 1995 | A |
5404872 | Choi | Apr 1995 | A |
5487379 | Koshiishi | Jan 1996 | A |
5518026 | Benjey | May 1996 | A |
5529057 | Ferrero | Jun 1996 | A |
5606967 | Wang | Mar 1997 | A |
5622165 | Huang | Apr 1997 | A |
5638811 | David | Jun 1997 | A |
5657746 | Christianson | Aug 1997 | A |
5664558 | Wagoner | Sep 1997 | A |
5671728 | Winefordner | Sep 1997 | A |
5697362 | Albrecht | Dec 1997 | A |
5791524 | Demarest | Aug 1998 | A |
5865169 | Lan | Feb 1999 | A |
5868129 | Christianson | Feb 1999 | A |
D406333 | Garraffa | Mar 1999 | S |
5893362 | Evans | Apr 1999 | A |
5906199 | Budzinski | May 1999 | A |
5924416 | Miller | Jul 1999 | A |
5937850 | Kawashima | Aug 1999 | A |
5947116 | Gamow | Sep 1999 | A |
5960791 | Winefordner | Oct 1999 | A |
6059157 | Parsons et al. | May 2000 | A |
6073626 | Riffe | Jun 2000 | A |
6079410 | Winefordner et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6085744 | Hermansen et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6119685 | Kawashima | Sep 2000 | A |
6123320 | Rasanow et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6129081 | Wu | Oct 2000 | A |
6129116 | Laskowski | Oct 2000 | A |
6202644 | Takeuchi | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6240962 | Tai et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6273046 | Pierce | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6276362 | Chen-Lieh | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6302102 | Giroux | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6318363 | Monnich | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6352075 | Wang | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6363929 | Winefordner | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6371108 | Christianson | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6394417 | Browne et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6401711 | Tibbs | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6435178 | Lin | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6478024 | White | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6513520 | Vinokur et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6575191 | Skeens et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6655378 | Swetish | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6709604 | Tai et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6736136 | Chen-Lieh | May 2004 | B2 |
6827105 | Marble et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6832706 | Hearld et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6883780 | Browne et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6908210 | Kuo | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6915801 | Pokras | Jul 2005 | B2 |
7182093 | Call et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7185796 | Parsons | Mar 2007 | B2 |
20020088460 | Monnich | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020170558 | Vinokur | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030029448 | Swetish | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030037783 | Feng | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20040035414 | Johnson | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20050034726 | Pittaway et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20060102176 | Junck | May 2006 | A1 |
20060272637 | Johnson | Dec 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1357249 | Jun 1974 | GB |
1434835 | May 1976 | GB |
2171781 | Sep 1986 | GB |
2313317 | Nov 1997 | GB |
09-032722 | Feb 1997 | JP |
10-299922 | Nov 1998 | JP |
2002-154480 | May 2002 | JP |
2004-169748 | Jun 2004 | JP |
365525 | Aug 1999 | TW |
200306273 | Nov 2003 | TW |
573667 | Jan 2004 | TW |
M248730 | Nov 2004 | TW |
M252649 | Dec 2004 | TW |
WO 9222342 | Dec 1992 | WO |
WO 2006042063 | Apr 2006 | WO |
WO 2006127556 | Nov 2006 | WO |
WO 2006127557 | Nov 2006 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060260703 A1 | Nov 2006 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60683477 | May 2005 | US |