The present invention generally relates to a checker brick, in particular refractory checker bricks used for recovering heat in recuperators, in particular in hot blast stoves.
In the metallurgical industry, the preheating of air for blast furnaces is conventionally carried out in adjacent regenerative heaters known as hot blast stoves. These stoves generally consist, for a stove with internal combustion chamber, of a cylindrical refractory wall and an internal vertical partition wall partitioning the stove into a combustion chamber and a checker chamber containing checker bricks or, for a stove with external combustion chamber, of two cylindrical refractory lined chambers with a connection dome. Air and fuel is introduced through one or two openings into a so-called ceramic burner or metallic burner in the combustion chamber for burning and the resultant combustion gasses flow upwardly from the combustion chamber over to the combustion chamber downwardly through the checker work chamber until they are finally exhausted at the base of that chamber. As the combustion gasses pass though the checker work chamber containing a plurality of checker bricks, heat from the combustion gasses is transferred to the checker bricks and retained therein. Once the checker bricks have reached a sufficiently high temperature, the direction of fluid flow in the stove is reversed. A cold blast is introduced at the base of the checker work chamber and is fed through the checker work chamber, where the cold blast absorbs heat from the checker bricks and passes over the partition wall and through the combustion chamber, where it leaves the stove through a hot blast outlet in the shell of the stove to be fed to the blast furnace.
Many different designs and arrangements of checker bricks have been designed over the years. An example of such a checker brick design can e.g. be seen in U.S. Pat. No. 4,436,144, which describes a checker brick having an octagonal outside contour and a central through passage of tetragonal cross-section. Furthermore, this brick has a substantially uniform wall thickness. Such bricks are preferably stacked in layers and staggered relative to each other. This results in a stack of checker bricks with vertical passages being formed for the gasses. In order to facilitate stacking of the checker bricks, they are provided with raised portions at the top surface of the brick and with corresponding recesses at the bottom surface of the brick.
Another example of such a checker brick design can e.g. be seen in U.S. Pat. No. 2,017,763, wherein an essentially square checker brick is provided with a plurality of through passages, each through passage being formed by a rectangular part and a tapered part. Due to the plurality of through passages, partition walls are being formed between the through passages. Compared to U.S. Pat. No. 4,436,144, these partition walls contribute to an increased strength of the checker brick. The plurality of through passages also allow to increase the total contact surface between the gas and the checker brick, thereby increasing the heating surface for a better heat exchange.
Checker bricks similar to the one disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 2,017,763 have been suggested, wherein the through passages have circular, square or hexagonal cross-section, the latter being particularly preferred because they allow partition walls of substantially uniform thickness. Checker bricks of hexagonal cross-section are also commercially known as checker bricks of the GSI type.
The invention provides a further improved checker brick with better thermodynamic performance
More particularly, the present invention proposes a checker brick, in particular for hot blast stove, the checker brick having a top surface and an opposite bottom surface, wherein a plurality of through passages extend from the top surface to the bottom surface for allowing fluids to circulate through the checker brick, partition walls being formed between neighbouring through passages. According to an aspect of the invention, the through passages have a cross-section based on a hexagonal shape having alternating convex and concave sides. This particular shape enables to increase the heating surface, i.e. the surface between the through passage and the checker brick, where heat transfer between the checker brick and the gas passing through the through passage occurs. With respect to hexagonal through passages, as e.g. present on the prior art checker bricks of the GSI type, the heating surface can be increased by approximately 40%. The reduced hydraulic diameter of the through passage leads to a bigger heat exchange coefficient. A nearly constant free cross-section is also achieved. A checker brick having through passages with such a cross-section hence has better thermodynamic performance.
Preferably, neighbouring through passages are arranged such that a concave side of one through passage faces a convex side of a neighbouring through passage. Neighbouring through passages are preferably arranged such that partition walls of substantially constant thickness are formed between neighbouring through passages. Substantially constant wall thickness allows a uniform heat transfer and, more importantly, a uniform heating up and cooling down of the partition walls themselves, thereby avoiding damages to the partition walls due to varying temperatures within the partition wall.
The concave sides can be formed with a curvature of a first radius; and the convex sides can be formed with a curvature of a second radius. The first radius can substantially correspond to the second radius. With the first and second radii being substantially the same, the convex f(tx+(1−t)y)<f(x)+(1−t)f(y) and concave f(tx+(1−t)y)>tf(x)+(1−t)f(y) sides of neighbouring checker bricks become complementary.
According to a preferred embodiment, the convex sides have two edge regions and a central region therebetween, wherein the concave sides are formed with a curvature of a first radius, the central regions of the convex sides are formed with a curvature of a second radius and the edge regions of the convex sides are formed with a curvature of a third radius, the third radius being smaller than the first and second radii. The third radius can e.g. be about half of the second radius. The smaller radius of the edge regions of the convex sides allows creating a smoother transition from the convex side to the concave side.
Advantageously, the through passages are tapered in a direction towards the top surface of the chequer brick.
Preferably, the chequer brick has substantially hexagonal cross-section, six side faces extending from the top surface to the bottom surface.
The side faces of the checker bricks are advantageously provided with channels having a cross-section corresponding to half the cross-section of a through passage; the channels being arranged in such a way that, when two neighbouring checker bricks are arranged side-by-side, the chambers of the side faces of the checker bricks form a through passage. The outer walls of the checker bricks hence also have an increased heating surface. Furthermore, additional through passages can be formed between two neighbouring checker bricks when arranged side-by-side. More importantly however, the outer walls of the checker bricks also have substantially constant thickness, just like the partition walls. Uniform heat transfer is hence also guaranteed in these outer walls.
According to a preferred embodiment of the invention, one of the top and bottom surfaces is provided with at least one raised portion, the other one of the top and bottom surfaces being provided with a corresponding at least one recess, the at least one raised portion and the at least one recess forming tongue and groove joints between stacked checker bricks. The at least one raised portion may comprise a central raised portion on the respective top or bottom surface. The central raised portion can have a cross-section with 3-fold rotational symmetry. The tongue and groove allows avoiding that checker bricks are incorrectly installed. Furthermore, the present tongue and groove configuration creates a bigger base area, which provides an improved creep-in-compression. As a consequence, checker bricks of lower quality material can be used to achieve comparable results, thereby reducing the costs of the checker bricks. The hot blast stove can be constructed smaller and lighter, which will reduce material cost and shorten erection time, without however reducing the performance of the hot blast stove.
Furthermore, the at least one raised portion preferably comprises peripheral raised portions in corner regions of the respective top or bottom surface, the peripheral raised portions being dimensioned and arranged so as to be complementary to peripheral raised portions of neighbouring checker bricks. The peripheral raised portions can be dimensioned and arranged so as to have a cross-section corresponding to the cross-section of the central raised portion. Central raised portions can interact with peripheral recesses, whereas peripheral raised portions can interact with central recesses. It follows that such a configuration of raised portions and recesses enables the staggered stacking of checker bricks. Due to the shape of the raised portions and recesses, it is ensured that the checker bricks are always correctly arranged.
It should also be noted that, in the present document, the term “concave” is to be understood to have the mathematical meaning of “strictly concave”, thereby excluding the straight line. Similarly, the term “convex” is to be understood to have the mathematical meaning of “strictly convex”, thereby excluding the straight line.
The present invention will be more apparent from the following description of one not limiting embodiment with reference to the attached drawings, wherein the figures show:
The shape of the cross-section of the through passages 16 may also be described as being a closed organic shape having six inflection points, each of these inflection points lying on a corner of a hexagonal shape.
As can also be seen on
Although not seen on the figures, the through passages 16 are tapered in a direction towards the top surface 12 of the chequer brick 10, i.e. the cross-section of the through passage 16 at the bottom surface 14 is bigger than the cross-section of the through passage 16 at the top surface 12.
Tongue and groove joints are provided for improving the stacking capabilities of the checker bricks 10. As seen in
In addition to the central raised portion 40, the hexagonal checker brick 10 of
It should also be noted that the raised portions 36 may also be provided on the bottom surface 14 if the recesses 38 are provided on the top surface 12.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
08152069 | Feb 2008 | EP | regional |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2008/068282 | 12/24/2008 | WO | 00 | 8/20/2010 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2009/106186 | 9/3/2009 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1173187 | Hechenbleikner | Feb 1916 | A |
1307635 | Nielsen | Jun 1919 | A |
2017763 | Mamula | Oct 1935 | A |
2172714 | Schack et al. | Sep 1939 | A |
2833532 | Ries | May 1958 | A |
3220715 | Kinney | Nov 1965 | A |
3436064 | Sheatsley et al. | Apr 1969 | A |
3549136 | Blackwood et al. | Dec 1970 | A |
RE27020 | Hauth et al. | Jan 1971 | E |
3591153 | Powell et al. | Jul 1971 | A |
3918517 | Silverstone et al. | Nov 1975 | A |
4075812 | Koyama et al. | Feb 1978 | A |
4150717 | Balke et al. | Apr 1979 | A |
4303599 | Strigle et al. | Dec 1981 | A |
4346753 | Kletch | Aug 1982 | A |
4436144 | Horak | Mar 1984 | A |
4474504 | Whitman et al. | Oct 1984 | A |
4490312 | Furr | Dec 1984 | A |
4597238 | Vadala′ | Jul 1986 | A |
4716066 | Wymann et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
4874034 | Hirata et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
4974666 | Hirata et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
5087150 | McCreary | Feb 1992 | A |
5127463 | Hirata et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5154224 | Yasui et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5200119 | Leva | Apr 1993 | A |
5304423 | Niknafs et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5419388 | Hickel et al. | May 1995 | A |
5429451 | Pettee, Jr. | Jul 1995 | A |
5449245 | Glickman | Sep 1995 | A |
5543088 | Halbirt | Aug 1996 | A |
5556228 | Smith | Sep 1996 | A |
5634313 | Mogling | Jun 1997 | A |
5688444 | Koshy | Nov 1997 | A |
5779391 | Knight | Jul 1998 | A |
5890836 | Leech | Apr 1999 | A |
5924477 | Doru | Jul 1999 | A |
D414276 | Bruno et al. | Sep 1999 | S |
6007915 | Rukovena | Dec 1999 | A |
6079902 | Pettee, Jr. | Jun 2000 | A |
D437423 | Lin | Feb 2001 | S |
6302188 | Ruhl et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6508042 | Kweon et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6547222 | Blischak et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6746177 | Hoashi | Jun 2004 | B1 |
D498002 | Ogawa et al. | Nov 2004 | S |
6811352 | Meerkerk | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6898906 | Drost | May 2005 | B2 |
6938382 | Schmitz | Sep 2005 | B2 |
7037037 | Smith et al. | May 2006 | B1 |
7246795 | Niknafs et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
D598505 | Sinisi et al. | Aug 2009 | S |
D605236 | Sinisi et al. | Dec 2009 | S |
7775507 | Niknafs et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
D623241 | Ruble, IV | Sep 2010 | S |
7862013 | Miller et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
D641803 | Kichijo et al. | Jul 2011 | S |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1096652 | Jun 1955 | FR |
994833 | Jun 1965 | GB |
63230810 | Sep 1988 | JP |
2004315921 | Nov 2004 | JP |
107441 | Nov 1993 | RO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report PCT/EP2008?068282; Dated Apr. 1, 2009. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100326621 A1 | Dec 2010 | US |