Not Applicable
Not Applicable
This invention relates to papermaking and particularly to the treatment of cellulosic material preparatory to use of the treated material to manufacture paper web material.
As is well known in the art, paper is commonly formed from wood. Generally, the industry divides wood used in papermaking into two categories; namely hardwoods and softwoods. Softwood fibers (tracheids) come from needle-bearing conifer trees such as pine, spruce, alpine fir, and Douglas fir. Hardwood fibers are derived from deciduous trees of various varieties.
Among the distinguishing differences between hardwood (HW) fibers and softwood (SW) fibers are (a) the length of the individual cellulosic fibers of the wood, (b) the coarseness of the fibers, and (c) the stiffness or collapsibility of the fibers.
The morphology of softwood fibers, tends to limit the potential uses of the papers producible from such fibers. “Paper” as used herein includes webs or sheets without limitation as to the size or basis weight of the web or sheet. For example, either HW or SW paper may be employed as “bleached board” (useful in containers for consumer products, for example) or as “container board” or “liner board” (useful in corrugated boxes, for example). Printability of a paper is a major consideration with respect to the end use of the paper. SW fibers are notoriously problematic as respects the printability of the paper produced from these fibers in that SW fiber papers tend to be inordinately porous, stiff, and must be treated specially to obtain a paper surface which is suitably printable.
It is well known in the art that HW and SW must be subjected to specific treatments for converting the wood into a fibrous slurry employed in the formation of a paper web. Softwoods are more plentiful and are more readily replaceable, as by tree farming. Softwoods in general are less costly. Thus, it is desirable that SW fibers be substituted for HW fibers wherever possible in papermaking. Southern pine, or mixtures of hardwoods and softwoods, are commonly examined as possible substitutes for end products which have heretofore been manufactured using hardwoods.
Heretofore, in attempts to utilize SW fibers in printable paper, it has been proposed to treat the pulped fibers with hydrolytic enzymes. Refining of the enzyme-treated fibers to alter their size, shape, degree of fibrillation, etc., have been employed. Enzyme treatments suffer from sensitivities of the enzyme to process conditions, and a tendency to become inactivated and/or to be carried forward into the papermaking equipment. The lack of cost-effectiveness has also been a long-standing issue.
Chemical treatments, such as hydrogen peroxide treatment, are commonly carried out under alkaline conditions for bleaching or brightening of wood pulps. This condition that is maximized for bleaching, usually does not correlate with the best conditions for maximum oxidation.
Smoothness and Formation are measures of, among other things, the printability of the paper. “Formation”, as used as a paper characteristic usually, and herein, is a synonym for relative uniformity over a scale of some distance, e.g., 5 to 20 mm. Formation may be judged by viewing it with light from the back and other means. Both smoothness and formation are affected, among other things, fiber length, morphology and collapsibility.
In accordance with one aspect of the present invention, it has been found that alteration of the morphology of cellulose fibers, particularly softwood fibers, by (a) subjecting the fibers to a metal ion-activated peroxide treatment carried out at a pH of between about 1 and about 9, preferably between 3 and 7, and (b) subjecting the treated fibers to a refining treatment converts SW fibers to HW-like fibers in many respects. The metal ion-activated peroxide treatment has been noted to act on pulp cellulose and hemi-cellulose, causing oxidation and oxidative degradation of cellulose fibers. The chemical treatment of the pulp, taken alone, is not sufficient to attain the desired modification of the morphology of the fibers, however, subsequent refining or like mechanical treatment of the chemically-treated fibers to achieve a given degree of refinement of the fibers requires dramatically less refining energy, e.g., between about 30 and 50% less energy to achieve a desired end point of refinement. The pulp treated in accordance with the present invention demonstrates substantially reduced fiber length or fiber length distribution, thereby enabling better uniformity of paper sheet (web) structure as measured by formation or texture. Moreover, the treated fibers are more collapsible during sheet consolidation and result in significantly improved paper surface properties such as smoothness. In these respects, SW fibers treated in accordance with the present invention are substantially functionally equivalent to HW fibers in regards to their usefulness in papermaking. The treatment of the present invention may be applied to wood chemical pulps (or pulp mixtures) having various processing histories such as pulping, bleaching or acid hydrolysis, or other combinations of processing of wood into pulp suitable for infeed to a papermaking machine.
In one embodiment, the present invention may be applied to pulp which has already been subjected to refining, chemical treatment, enzyme treatment, microfibrilltion, and/or acid hydrolysis, for example, to increase the pulp freeness or improve drainage during the papermaking process and/or to reduce the cellulose particles suspension viscosity and improving flow characteristic.
In a further embodiment, the advantages of the present invention may be achieved employing a hypochlorite treatment at pH 3-9, preferably, pH 3-8 and employing hypochlorous acid as the dominate active agent, followed by subsequent refining of the treated pulp.
Moreover, either the metal ion-activated peroxide or the hypochlorous acid treatment may be applied alone to refined fibers for increased freeness/drainage, or on micro-fibrillated cellulose materials for reduced suspension viscosity. Further, either embodiment may be employed as a means for controlling the viscosity of a pulp suspension at any of various locations between the initial digestion of the cellulose material to and including the feeding of the pulp suspension into a papermaking machine. This latter aspect of the present invention is applicable in the dissolution of pulp for viscose production, for example. In certain stances, the beneficial effects of the present invention are exhibited in the calendaring of a paper web or sheet formed from treated SW fibers or combinations of HW fibers and treated SW fibers.
In a still further embodiment, the present invention may be combined with a fiber fractionation process for the treatment of specific fiber fractions.
Paper produced employing pulp treated in accordance with the present invention exhibits tear strengths at HW levels, with little material deterioration of tensile strength. Improved bonding of the fibers within the sheet is also provided due to enhanced freeness.
The above-mentioned features of the invention will become more clearly understood from the following detailed description of the invention read together with the drawings in which:
In accordance with one aspect of the present invention, there is provided a method for the transformation of softwood fibers, particularly Southern pine fibers, into hardwood-like fibers. The method employs the steps of (a) subjecting a SW pulp containing cellulose and hemicellulose, to a solution containing a transitional metal ion and a peroxide at a pH of between about 1 and 9 for a time sufficient to oxidize a substantial portion of the cellulose/hemi-cellulose and to oxidatively degrade the cellulose fibers, and (b) subjecting the treated pulp to a refining operation. The pulp thus treated, when formed into a web on a papermaking machine exhibits many hardwood-like properties such as overall formability into a web having surface properties like webs formed from hardwood fibers employing conventional papermaking techniques.
In one embodiment of the present invention, softwood fibers obtained from coniferous trees, and particularly Southern pine trees, are converted into a pulp employing the kraft process in which the fibers are treated in a heated alkaline solution to substantially separate the fibers from their lignin binder, as is well known in the art. Whereas Southern pine fibers are particularly suitable for treatment employing the present invention, it is recognized that fibers from other coniferous trees may be employed. Further, the present invention may be advantageously employed with mixtures of SW and HW fibers, for example mixtures containing between about 50% and 90% by weight of SW pulp and between about 10% and 50% HW pulp.
The SW pulp or mixture of SW and HW pulps, prior to treatment thereof employing the present invention, may comprise pulp which has not undergone any conventional treatment of the pulp subsequent to the digestion step. However, the present invention is useful in treating pulps which, subsequent to digestion, have undergone substantially any of the commonly employed treatments of pulp such as an acid hydrolysis for removal of hexauronic acid, oxidation/bleaching employing oxygen and/or peroxide, or ozone, on the pulp and/or mechanical treatment of the pulp, ie., refining. In the most commonly contemplated process, the pulp or mixture of pulps, to be subjected to the method of the present invention will be a pulp(s) which has been digested and at least washed to remove black liquor.
In accordance with one aspect of the present invention, the pulp solution, at a temperature of between about 40 and 120 degrees C., is subjected to a solution of a transitional metal-activated peroxide for between about 10 and 600 minutes. In general, a higher treatment temperature will require less residence time, and vice versa. It is preferable that the treatment be done at 70-79 degrees C., with a residence time between 30-180 minutes. The treatment (either continuous or batch) can be carried out in a bleach tower, high-density tower, re-pulper tanks, or any suitable vessel with sufficient mixing and residence time.
In a preferred embodiment, and contrary to the conventional peroxide treatment of pulp wherein transitional metal ions are avoided or eliminated to avoid pulp damage or degradation by hydroxyl radicals, the treatment solution of the present invention, includes between about 0.2% and about 5% by wt. hydrogen peroxide and between about 0.002% and about 0.1% of a transitional metal ions, based on pulp. Iron (III) salts such as ferric chloride, or iron (II) salts such as ferrous sulfate and ferrous chloride, are especially useful as a source of the metal ions. Other metal ions, such as copper (II), cobalt(II) may be employed. In any event, as noted, only a trace of the transitional metal ions is required to achieve the advantageous results of the present invention, preferably between about 0.002% and about 0.01% of the metal ion.
Further contrary to conventional peroxide treatment of pulp wherein the peroxide treatment is carried out with the pulp at a very high pH for bleaching, in the present invention, the pulp treatment is carried out at a pH of between about 1 and about 9, preferably a pH between about 2 and 7.
Subjection of softwood pulp to the solution of the present invention at a temperature between about 40 C and about 120 C and at a pH between about 1 and about 9, has been found to cause oxidation and oxidative pulp degradation of the long, stiff and coarse kraft fibers. This chemical treatment of the fibers is followed by a mechanical treatment of the treated pulp, e.g., refining employing a conventional disc refiner, to cause fiber morphology change and paper property enhancement with respect to hardwood pulps. It will be understood by one skilled in the art that other mechanical treatment devices which provide equivalent refining of the pulp fibers may be employed.
Bleached southern pine Kraft pulp from International Paper-Augusta mill was treated at pH 4 with 1% hydrogen peroxide as based on pulp, with 0.01% Fe added as with ferric chloride. The treatment was conducted at the temperature of 80° C. for 1 hour. Both the treated and the control (untreated) pine pulps were refined with a PFI refiner. The data on PFI freeness and average fiber length are shown in Table I
As shown in
Bleached southern pine as employed in Example 1 was treated with 1% hydrogen peroxide based on pulp at pH 4, with 0.006% FE(II) as from ferrous sulfate. The treatment was carried out at the temperature of 70° C. for 1 hour. The treated pulp and control were PFI refined as in Example 1. TAPPI hand sheets were then made from these pulps.
To illustrate fiber morphology (beyond fiber length distributions) and fiber collapsibility, SEM (scanning electron microscopy) images were made of the hand sheet surface of treated vs. the control (untreated) softwood pulps, compared at 4000 Revs of PFI refining. These microphotographs are depicted in
Bleached southern pine pulp was treated with 1% hydrogen peroxide catalyzed by 0.006% Fe(II) at pH 4 as in the Example 2 above. The treated pulps were PFI refined, and made into hand sheets for paper physical property evaluations. Results are shown in Table II.
From this table, it is noted that the treated pine, after refined to ˜560 CSF or lower freeness (to shorten the fibers also), show improved bulk-smoothness. This is also shown in
In terms of mechanical properties, the treatment impacted significantly the Tear strength, reducing it to the level of hardwood (
Other mechanical properties were only slightly affected, and remain substantially higher than hardwood furnish. Interestingly, as shown in Table II, the elastic stiffness of treated pine can even be higher than that of the control pine.
The treated pine as in Example 3 above, refined to 560 CSF, was also mixed with hardwood pulp of a range of freeness, to investigate the mixed furnish paper properties such as bulk and smoothness. The results are listed in Table III.
A Voith LR1 Disc Refiner was used to refine bleached southern pine which 5 had been treated with 1% hydrogen peroxide, as catalyzed by Fe(III) at pH4. The refiner specific edge load was set at 0.8 Ws/m. As seen from Table IV,
A Voith LR1 Disc Refiner was used to refine bleached southern pine, which had been treated with 1% hydrogen peroxide, as catalyzed by Fe(II) at pH4. The refiner specific edge load was set at 4 km.
From Table V,
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1298552 | Ornstein | Mar 1919 | A |
1298553 | Ornstein | Mar 1919 | A |
1298554 | Ornstein | Mar 1919 | A |
1860431 | Richter | May 1932 | A |
2178696 | Muskat et al. | Nov 1939 | A |
2212338 | Bown | Aug 1940 | A |
2368527 | Edelstien | Jan 1945 | A |
2512338 | Klug et al. | Jun 1950 | A |
2975169 | Cranford et al. | Mar 1961 | A |
3308012 | Tobar | Mar 1967 | A |
3707148 | Bryce | Dec 1972 | A |
4022965 | Goheen et al. | May 1977 | A |
4222819 | Fossum et al. | Sep 1980 | A |
4270976 | Sandstrom et al. | Jun 1981 | A |
4410397 | Kempf | Oct 1983 | A |
4427490 | Eckert | Jan 1984 | A |
4444621 | Lindahl | Apr 1984 | A |
4454005 | Stofko et al. | Jun 1984 | A |
4599138 | Lindahl | Jul 1986 | A |
4614646 | Christiansen | Sep 1986 | A |
4661205 | Ow et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
4756799 | Bengtsson et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4783239 | Rich | Nov 1988 | A |
4869783 | Prusas et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4875974 | Rich | Oct 1989 | A |
4889595 | Herron et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
5002635 | Gentile, Jr. et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5296099 | Griggs et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5300358 | Evers | Apr 1994 | A |
5383964 | Suc et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5447602 | Sajbel et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5460924 | Buchanan et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5529662 | Tan et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5536625 | Buchanan et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5552019 | Weinstock et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5607546 | Hoglund et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5766159 | Martin et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5863389 | White et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
6063982 | Martin et al. | May 2000 | A |
6214164 | Rantala | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6258207 | Pan | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6302997 | Hurter et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6306253 | Henricson | Oct 2001 | B2 |
6368456 | Cimecioglu et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6379494 | Jewell et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6398908 | Hermansson et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6436238 | Pitkanen et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6458245 | Hoglund et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6514380 | Laine et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6562195 | Cimecioglu et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6605350 | Sealey et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6632328 | Wan et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6635755 | Jaschinski et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6695950 | Cimecioglu et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6699358 | Evans et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6743332 | Haynes et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6765042 | Thornton et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6770168 | Stigsson | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6773552 | Albert et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6824645 | Jaschinski et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6852904 | Sun et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6881299 | Parrish et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6923889 | Huuskonen et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
7094317 | Lundberg et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7279071 | Williams et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7326317 | Westermark et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7520958 | Tan et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
8007635 | Tan et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
20010028955 | Luo et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010050153 | Wajer et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020005262 | Cimecioglu et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020144796 | Wan et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020165110 | Reinhardt et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030019596 | Ragauskas et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030026828 | Besemer et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20040154761 | Duggirala et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040154765 | Huuskonen et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20050061455 | Tan et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20060144535 | Nguyen et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060260773 | Tan et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070000627 | Tan et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070051481 | Tan et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070119556 | Tan et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070143932 | Buchert et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070163735 | Buchert et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20080294132 | Tan et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090054863 | Tan et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090165968 | Tan et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20110287275 | Tan et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1129161 | Aug 1982 | CA |
1190360 | Jul 1985 | CA |
10123665 | Nov 2002 | DE |
1077285 | Feb 2001 | EP |
1156065 | Nov 2001 | EP |
1245722 | Oct 2002 | EP |
1862587 | Dec 2007 | EP |
1862587 | Dec 2007 | EP |
2688787 | Sep 1993 | FR |
555985 | Sep 1943 | GB |
58054089 | Mar 1983 | JP |
2001115389 | Apr 2001 | JP |
2002026701 | Jan 2003 | JP |
2268327 | May 2005 | RU |
9535408 | Dec 1995 | WO |
WO 9722749 | Jun 1997 | WO |
WO02095129 | Nov 2002 | WO |
03042451 | May 2003 | WO |
WO 03042451 | May 2003 | WO |
WO2005028744 | Mar 2005 | WO |
WO 2005028744 | Mar 2005 | WO |
WO2006119392 | Nov 2006 | WO |
WO2006127880 | Nov 2006 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050061455 A1 | Mar 2005 | US |