Chemical amplification based on fluid partitioning

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • RE48788
  • Patent Number
    RE48,788
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, August 28, 2018
    5 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, October 26, 2021
    2 years ago
Abstract
A system for nucleic acid amplification of a sample comprises partitioning the sample into partitioned sections and performing PCR on the partitioned sections of the sample. Another embodiment of the invention provides a system for nucleic acid amplification and detection of a sample comprising partitioning the sample into partitioned sections, performing PCR on the partitioned sections of the sample, and detecting and analyzing the partitioned sections of the sample.
Description
BACKGROUND

1. Field of Endeavor


The present invention relates to chemical amplification and more particularly to chemical amplification based on fluid partitioning.


2. State of Technology


U.S. Pat. No. 4,683,202 issued Jul. 28, 1987; U.S. Pat. No. 4,683,195 issued Jul. 28, 1987; and U.S. Pat. No. 4,800,159 issued Jan. 24, 1989 to Kary B. Mullis et al provide background information. The patents describe processes for producing any particular nucleic acid sequence from a given sequence of DNA or RNA in amounts which are large compared to the amount initially present. The DNA or RNA may be single-or-double-stranded, and may be a relatively pure species or a component of a mixture of nucleic acids. The process utilizes a repetitive reaction to accomplish the amplification of the desired nucleic acid sequence. The extension product of one primer when hybridized to the other becomes a template for the production of the desired specific nucleic acid sequence, and vice versa, and the process is repeated as often as is necessary to produce the desired amount of the sequence.


U.S. Pat. No. 6,503,715 for a nucleic acid ligand diagnostic biochip issued Jan. 7, 2003 provides the following background information, “Methods are provided in the instant invention for obtaining diagnostic and prognostic Nucleic acid ligands, attaching said ligands to a Biochip, and detecting binding of target molecules in a Bodily to said Biochip-bound Nucleic acid ligands.” In one embodiment of the instant invention, one or more Nucleic acid ligands are chosen that bind to molecules known to be diagnostic or prognostic of a disease; these ligands are then attached to the Biochip. Particular methods for attaching the Nucleic acid ligands to the Biochip are described below in the section entitled “Fabrication of the Nucleic Acid Biochip.” The Biochip may comprise either (i) Nucleic acid ligands selected against a single target molecule; or more preferably, (ii) Nucleic acid ligands selected against multiple target molecules.


U.S. Patent Application No. 2002/0197623 for nucleic acid detection assays published Dec. 26, 2002 provides the following background information, “means for the detection and characterization of nucleic acid sequences, as well as variations in nucleic acid sequences . . . methods for forming a nucleic acid cleavage structure on a target sequence and cleaving the nucleic acid cleavage structure in a site-specific manner. The structure-specific nuclease activity of a variety of enzymes is used to cleave the target-dependent cleavage structure, thereby indicating the presence of specific nucleic acid sequences or specific variations thereof.”


SUMMARY

Features and advantages of the present invention will become apparent from the following description. Applicants are providing this description, which includes drawings and examples of specific embodiments, to give a broad representation of the invention. Various changes and modifications within the spirit and scope of the invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art from this description and by practice of the invention. The scope of the invention is not intended to be limited to the particular forms disclosed and the invention covers all modifications, equivalents, and alternatives falling within the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the claims.


The present invention provides an apparatus for nucleic acid amplification of a sample comprising means for partitioning the sample into partitioned sections and means for performing PCR on the partitioned sections of the sample. Another embodiment of the invention provides an apparatus for nucleic acid amplification and detection of a sample comprising means for partitioning the sample into partitioned sections, means for performing PCR on the partitioned sections of the sample, and means for detection and analysis of the partitioned sections of the sample. The present invention also provides a method of nucleic acid amplification of a sample comprising the steps of partitioning the sample into partitioned sections and subjecting the partitioned sections of the sample to PCR. Another embodiment of a method of the present invention provides a method of nucleic acid amplification and detection of a sample comprising the steps of partitioning the sample into partitioned sections, subjecting the partitioned sections of the sample to PCR, and detecting and analyzing the partitioned sections of the sample.


The invention is susceptible to modifications and alternative forms. Specific embodiments are shown by way of example. It is to be understood that the invention is not limited to the particular forms disclosed. The invention covers all modifications, equivalents, and alternatives falling within the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the claims.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated into and constitute a part of the specification, illustrate specific embodiments of the invention and, together with the general description of the invention given above, and the detailed description of the specific embodiments, serve to explain the principles of the invention.



FIG. 1 is a flow diagram illustrating one embodiment of a system constructed in accordance with the present invention.



FIG. 2 is a flow diagram illustrating another embodiment of a system constructed in accordance with the present invention.



FIG. 3 is a diagram of another embodiment of a system constructed in accordance with the present invention.



FIG. 4 is a diagram of another embodiment of a system constructed in accordance with the present invention.



FIG. 5 is a diagram of another embodiment of a system constructed in accordance with the present invention.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

Referring now to the drawings, to the following detailed description, and to incorporated materials; detailed information about the invention is provided including the description of specific embodiments. The detailed description serves to explain the principles of the invention. The invention is susceptible to modifications and alternative forms. The invention is not limited to the particular forms disclosed. The invention covers all modifications, equivalents, and alternatives falling within the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the claims.


Referring now to the drawings, and in particular to FIG. 1, a flow diagram of one embodiment of a system constructed in accordance with the present invention is illustrated. The system is designated generally by the reference numeral 100. The system 100 provides a method and apparatus for performing extremely rapid nucleic acid amplification. The flow diagram illustrating system 100 shows block 101 “partitioning” the sample and block 102 performing “CR” on the sample. The system 100 provides an apparatus for nucleic acid amplification of a sample comprising means for partitioning the sample and means for performing PCR on the sample. The system 100 also provides a method of nucleic acid amplification of a sample comprising the steps of partitioning the sample and subjecting the sample to PCR. The system 100 has application wherever current PCR-type systems exist.


In block 101 a chemical reagent and an input sample are “partitioned” into a large number of microdroplets or other forms of fluid partitions prior to amplification in block 102. The partitioning 101 involves dispersing the DNA-containing solution. For example the partitioning 101 can be accomplished by dispersing the DNA-containing solution in an immiscible carrier liquid. The DNA-containing solution is dispersed in the immiscible carrier fluid as microdroplets. The DNA-containing solution can be partitioned in other ways, for example, by being dispersed as liquid slugs separated by the carrier fluid, as an emulsion with the carrier fluid, or by using a gelling agent that prevents transfer of DNA between partitioned regions. The DNA-containing solution can also be partitioned mechanically by partitioning the fluid into micro-tubes or capillaries, or into micro-wells.


With the system 100, each partitioned DNA-containing fluid volume contains the necessary biochemical constituents for selectively amplifying a specified portion of a sample DNA via polymerase chain reaction (PCR). The target DNA can be detected by monitoring for the colorimetric indicator (e.g., flourescence or optical absorption) generated with each DNA template duplicaton sequence.


In block 102 selected portions of each nucleic acid sample are amplified using polymerase chain reaction (PCR), with the product contained in each partitioned fluid volume. This results in much more concentrated amplification product, since the volume containing the reaction is so small.


The polymerase chain reaction (PCR), is a cyclic process whereby a large quantity of identical DNA strands can be produced from one original template. The procedure was developed in 1985 by Kerry Mullis, who was awarded the 1993 Nobel prize in chemistry for his work. In PCR, DNA is immersed in a solution containing the enzyme DNA polymerase, unattached nucleotide bases, and primers, which are short sequences of nucleotides designed to bind with an end of the desired DNA segment. Two primers are used in the process: one primer binds at one end of the desired segment on one of the two paired DNA strands, and the other primer binds at the opposite end on the other strand. The solution is heated to break the bonds between the strands of the DNA, then when the solution cools, the primers bind to the separated strands, and DNA polymerase quickly builds a new strand by joining the free nucleotide bases to the primers in the 5′-3′ direction. When this process is repeated, a strand that was formed with one primer binds to the other primer, resulting in a new strand that is restricted solely to the desired segment. Thus the region of DNA between the primers is selectively replicated. Further repetitions of the process can produce a geometric increase in the number of copies, (theoretically 2n if 100% efficient whereby n equals the number of cycles), in effect billions of copies of a small piece of DNA can be replicated in several hours.


A PCR reaction is comprised of (a) a double-stranded DNA molecule, which is the “template” that contains the sequence to be amplified, (b) primer(s), which is a single-stranded DNA molecule that can anneal (bind) to a complimentary DNA sequence in the template DNA; (c) dNTPs, which is a mixture of dATP, dTTP, dGTP, and dCTP which are the nucleotide subunits that will be put together to form new DNA molecules in the PCR amplification procedure; and (d) Taq DNA polymerase, the enzyme which synthesizes the new DNA molecules using dNTPs.


Current amplification systems are limited in practice to half hour type amplification and detection windows (−30 cycles, 1 minute/cycle). The system 100 provides faster amplification. This has many applications, for example, in Homeland Defense applications, faster detection methods (a few minutes) can push the deployment of these sensors from “detect to treat” to “detect to protect,” having a serious impact on the number of casualties from a massive bioagent release.


The system 100 has significant advantages over typical bulk DNA detection techniques (even microscale bulk solution approaches), including (1) much faster detection time through a reduction in the total number of temperature cycles required, (2) a reduction in the time for each cycle, and (3) removing interference from competing DNA templates. The system 100 achieves a reduction in the total number of cycles by limiting the dilution of the optically generated signal (e.g., fluorescence or absorption). The formation of partitioned fluid volumes of the DNA-containing solution effectively isolates the fluid volumes which contain the target DNA from the fluid volumes that do not contain the target DNA. Therefore, the dilution of the optical signal is largely eliminated, allowing much earlier detection. This effect is directly related to the number of fluid partitions formed from the initial sample/reagent pool.


The system 100 achieves a reduction in the total number of cycles that are needed by limiting the dilution of the optically generated signal (e.g., fluorescence or absorption). The formation of partitioned fluid volumes of the DNA-containing solution effectively isolates the fluid volumes which contain the target DNA from the fluid volumes that do not contain the target DNA. Therefore, the dilution of the optical signal is largely eliminated, allowing much earlier detection. This effect is directly related to the number of fluid partitions formed from the initial sample/reagent pool. The effect of the number of fluid partitions on the number of cycles required for detection can be described by the following Equation E1:






N
=


ln









D
L




A
N



(

V
X

)







ln


(
2
)








where: N=number of cycles; DL,=detection limit for optical signal [moles/liter]; X=initial number of DNA molecules; V=volume containing DNA molecules [liters]; AN=Avagadro's number [6.023×1023 molecules/mole]. From Equation E1 it is clear that N, the number of cycles until detection, decreases as V, the partitioned fluid volume, decreases.


The system 100 reduces the duration of each temperature cycle by effectively increasing the concentration of reactants by enclosing them in picoliter type volumes. Since reaction rates depend on the concentration of the reactants, the efficiency of a partitioned fluid volume or droplet should be higher than in an ordinary vessel (such as a test tube) where the reactant quantity (DNA quantity) is extremely low. It is estimated that through the reduction in the number of cycles and the reduction in the time required for each cycles that the FPDD technique can reduce the detection time by an order of magnitude as compared to bulk solution DNA detection techniques.



The system 100 facilitates removal of interference from competing DNA templates. Given the extremely small volumes involved with Fluid-Partitioned DNA Detection (FPDD), it is possible to isolate a single template of the target DNA in a given partitioned volume or microdroplet. For example, the formation of 2000 partitioned fluid volumes or microdroplets (each with a volume of 5×10′9 liters) made by dividing a bulk solution of 10 microliters containing 200 DNA molecules, would result in one DNA molecule per microdroplet on average. This makes it possible to amplify only one template in mixtures containing many kinds of templates without interference. This is extremely important in processing of real world aerosol samples containing complex mixtures of DNA from many sources, and has direct application in screening of cDNA libraries.The system 100 facilitates removal of interference from competing DNA templates. Given the extremely small volumes involved with Fluid-Partitioned DNA Detection (FPDD), it is possible to isolate a single template of the target DNA in a given partitioned volume or microdroplet. For example, the formation of 2000 partitioned fluid volumes or microdroplets (each with a volume of 5×10′9 liters) made by dividing a bulk solution of 10 microliters containing 2000 DNA molecules, would result in one DNA molecule per microdroplet on average. This makes it possible to amplify only one template in mixtures containing many kinds of templates without interference. This is extremely important in processing of real world aerosol samples containing complex mixtures of DNA from many sources, and has direct application in screening of cDNA libraries.


Referring now to FIG. 2, a flow diagram of another embodiment of a system constructed in accordance with the present invention is illustrated. The system is designated generally by the reference numeral 200. The flow diagram illustrating system 200 shows block 201 “partitioning” the sample, block 202 performing “PCR” on the sample, and block 203 “detection and analysis.” The system 200 provides a method and apparatus for performing extremely rapid nucleic acid amplification and detection. The system 200 provides an apparatus for nucleic acid amplification of a sample comprising means for partitioning the sample into partitioned sections, means for performing PCR on the partitioned sections, and means for detection and analysis of the partitioned sections. The system 200 also provides a method of nucleic acid amplification of a sample comprising the steps of partitioning the sample into partitioned sections, subjecting the partitioned sections to PCR, and detecting and analyzing the partitioned sections of the sample.


In block 201 a chemical reagent and an input sample are “partitioned” into a large number of microdroplets or other forms of fluid partitions prior to amplification. The system 200 achieves a reduction in the total number of cycles by limiting the dilution of the optically generated signal (e.g., fluorescence or absorption). The formation of partitioned fluid volumes of the DNA-containing solution effectively isolates the fluid volumes which contain the target DNA from the fluid volumes that do not contain the target DNA. Therefore, the dilution of the optical signal is largely eliminated, allowing much earlier detection. This effect is directly related to the number of fluid partitions formed from the initial sample/reagent pool.


In block 202 selected portions of each nucleic acid sample are then amplified using polymerase chain reaction (PCR), with the product contained in each partitioned fluid volume. This results in much more concentrated amplification product, since the volume containing the reaction is so small. If a Taqman type detection approach is used, fluorescent dye molecules unquenched by the PCF amplification are also more concentrated, making possible earlier optical based detection. Since it is possible to contain very amounts of the starting target DNA in each partition fluid volume, inhibitory competition from near-neighbor DNA templates is less allowing screening of very dilute samples.



In block 203 partitioned portions of the sample are detected by monitoring for the calorimetric indicator (e.g., fluorescence or optical absorption) generated with each DNA template duplication sequence. The partitioned portions of the sample are optically probed to detect the colorimetric indicator which signals the presence of the target DNA. The partitioned portions of the sample can also be scanned optically to detect the colorimetric indicator signaling the presence of the target DNA. In one embodiment, fluorescence, generated by degradation of the dye/quencher pair on the primer, is detected using a confocal imaging system such as that employed in conventional flow cytometers. Scattering profiles from individual microdroplets, as in conventional flow cytometers, can be used to eliminate background signal from other particles.In block 203 partitioned portions of the sample are detected by monitoring for the colorimetric indicator (e.g., fluorescence or optical absorption) generated with each DNA template duplication sequence. The partitioned portions of the sample are optically probed to detect the colorimetric indicator which signals the presence of the target DNA. The partitioned portions of the sample can also be scanned optically to detect the colorimetric indicator signaling the presence of the target DNA. In one embodiment, fluorescence, generated by degradation of the dye/quencher pair on the primer, is detected using a confocal imaging system such as that employed in conventional flow cytometers. Scattering profiles from individual microdroplets, as in conventional flow cytometers, can be used to eliminate background signal from other particles.


The system 200 has application wherever current PCR-type systems exist, including medical, drug-discovery, biowarfare detection, and other related fields. Biowarfare detection applications include identifying, detecting, and monitoring bio-threat agents that contain nucleic acid signatures, such as spores, bacteria, etc. Biomedical applications include tracking, identifying, and monitoring outbreaks of infectious disease. The system 200 provides rapid, high throughput detection of biological pathogens (viruses, bacteria, DNA in biological fluids, blood, saliva, etc.) for medical applications. Forensic applications include rapid, high throughput detection of DNA in biological fluids for forensic purposes. Food and beverage safety applications include automated food testing for bacterial contamination.


Referring now to FIG. 3, a diagram of another embodiment of a system constructed in accordance with the present invention is illustrated. The system is designated generally by the reference numeral 300. The system 300 provides an instrument for performing Fluid-Partitioned DNA Detection (FPDD) with PCR based detection and amplification. The system 300 includes a partitioning section 301, a PCR section 302, and a detection and analysis section 303.


The partitioning section 301 includes a sample introduction unit 304 and a unit 305 where the sample and a PCR reagent are combined. The sample and a PCR reagent are injected through a small orifice 306. The injection of the sample through the small orifice 306 produces microdroplets 308.


The PCR section 302 includes a continuous tube 309 for circulating the microdroplets 308 and suspended in an immiscible carrier fluid 314. The microdroplets 308 suspended in an immiscible carrier fluid 314 are pumped through the continuous tube 309 by pump 311. The microdroplets 308 suspended in an immiscible carrier fluid 314 are cycled through heater 310 and cooler 315 to perform PCR.


The detection and analysis section 303 includes a blue laser 312 and a detector 313. The laser 312 is projected upon the droplets 308 as they pass through tube 308 between the laser 312 and the detector 313.


In the system 300, the DNA-containing solution is partitioned into many microdroplets 308 and suspended in an immiscible carrier fluid 314. The microdroplets 308 are formed by forcing the PCR mix (sample and reagent) through the small orifice or microjet 306. These microdroplets 308 are then captured in the immiscible fluid 314, such as mineral oil, and flowed past the heating element 310 and cooler 315. An optical signal (e.g., fluorescence or optical absorption), generated by degradation of the dye/quencher pair on the primer, is detected using a confocal imaging system such as that employed in conventional flow cytometers. Scattering profiles from individual microdroplets, as in conventional flow cytometers, can be used to eliminate background signal from other particles. Once exposed to multiple heating cycles, the microdroplets can be identified and probed for an optical signal at rates of several thousand per second.


The FPDD system achieves a reduction in the total number of cycles by limiting the dilution of the optically generated signal (e.g., fluorescence or absorption). The formation of partitioned fluid volumes of the DNA-containing solution effectively isolates the fluid volumes which contain the target DNA from the fluid volumes that do not contain the target DNA. Therefore, the dilution of the optical signal is largely eliminated, allowing much earlier detection. This effect is directly related to the number of fluid partitions formed from the initial sample/reagent pool. The effect of the number of fluid partitions on the number of cycles required for detection is described by the Equation E1 set out earlier.


The FPDD technique reduces the duration of each temperature cycle by effectively increasing the concentration of reactants by enclosing them in picoliter type volumes. Since reaction rates depend on the concentration of the reactants, the efficiency of a partitioned fluid volume or droplet should be higher than in an ordinary vessel (such as a test tube) where the reactant quantity (DNA quantity) is extremely low. It is estimated that through the reduction in the number of cycles and the reduction in the time required for each cycles that the FPDD technique can reduce the detection time by an order of magnitude as compared to bulk solution DNA detection techniques



The FPDD technique facilitates removal of interference from competing DNA templates. Given the extremely small volumes involved with FPDD, it is possible to isolate a single template of the target DNA in a given partitioned volume or microdroplet. For example, the formation of 2000 partitioned fluid volumes or microdroplets (each with a volume of 5×10−9 liters) made by dividing a bulk solution of 10 microliters containing 200 DNA molecules, would result in one DNA molecule per microdroplet on average. This makes it possible to amplify only one template in mixtures containing many kinds of templates without interference. This is extremely important in processing of real world aerosol samples containing complex mixtures of DNA from many sources, and has direct application in screening of cDNA libraries.The FPDD technique facilitates removal of interference from competing DNA templates. Given the extremely small volumes involved with FPDD, it is possible to isolate a single template of the target DNA in a given partitioned volume or microdroplet. For example, the formation of 2000 partitioned fluid volumes or microdroplets (each with a volume of 5×10−9 liters) made by dividing a bulk solution of 10 microliters containing containing 2000 DNA molecules, would result in one DNA molecule per microdroplet on average. This makes it possible to amplify only one template in mixtures containing many kinds of templates without interference. This is extremely important in processing of real world aerosol samples containing complex mixtures of DNA from many sources, and has direct application in screening of cDNA libraries.


With this new bioassay technique, each partitioned DNA-containing fluid volume contains the necessary biochemical constituents for selectively amplifying a specified portion of a sample DNA via polymerase chain reaction (PCR). The target DNA is detected by monitoring for the colorimetric indicator (e.g., fluorescence or optical absorption) generated with each DNA template duplication sequence.


The system 300 provides a fast, flexible and inexpensive high throughput, bioassay technology based on creation and suspension of microdroplets in an immiscible carrier stream. Each microdroplet contains the necessary biochemical constituents for selectively amplifying and fluorescently detecting a specified portion of a sample DNA via polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Once exposed to multiple heating cooling cycles, the microdroplets can be identified and probed for fluorescent signal at rates of several thousand per second.


Isolating the PCR reaction in such small (picoliter) volumes provides an order of magnitude reduction in overall detection time by:

    • (1) reducing the duration of each temperature cycle—the concentration of reactants increases by enclosing them in picoliter type volumes. Since reaction kinetics depend on the concentration of the reactant, the efficiency of a microdroplet should be higher than in an ordinary vessel (such a test tube) where the reactant quantity is infinitesimal
    • (2) reducing the total number of cycles—dilution of the fluorescently generated signal is largely eliminated in such a small volume, allowing much earlier detection. This effect is directly related to the number of microdroplets formed from the initial sample/reagent pool. Since PCR is an exponential process, for example, 1000 microdroplets would produce a signal 10 cycles faster than typical processing with bulk solutions.
    • (3) removing interference from competing DNA templates—given the extremely small volumes involved, it is possible to isolate a single template of the target DNA in a given microdroplet. A pL microdoplet filled with a 1 pM solution, for example, will be occupied by only one molecule on average. This makes it possible to amplify only one template in mixtures containing many kinds of templates without interference. This is extremely important in processing of real world aerosol samples containing complex mixtures of DNA from many sources, and has direct application in screening of precious cDNA libraries.


Referring now to FIG. 4, an illustration of another embodiment of a system constructed in accordance with the present invention is illustrated. The system is designated generally by the reference numeral 400. The system 300 provides system for nucleic acid amplification of a sample. The system 400 includes means for partitioning the sample into partitioned sections and means for performing PCR on the partitioned sections of the sample.


The sample is separated into immiscible slugs 406, 407, and 408. The immiscible slugs 406, 407, and 408 are formed through a system of microfluidics. Background information on microfluidics is contained in U.S. Pat. No. 5,876,187 for micropumps with fixed valves to Fred K. Forster et al., patented Mar. 2, 1999. As stated in U.S. Pat. No. 5,876,187, “Miniature pumps, hereafter referred to as micropumps, can be constructed using fabrication techniques adapted from those applied to integrated circuits. Such fabrication techniques are often referred to as micromachining. Micropumps are in great demand for environmental, biomedical, medical, biotechnical, printing, analytical instrumentation, and miniature cooling applications.” Microchannels 403, 404, and 405 are formed in substrates 401 and 402. The disclosures of U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,876,187 and 5,876,187 are incorporated herein by reference.


The immiscible slugs 406, 407, and 408 can be moved through the microchannels using magnetohydrodynamics. Background information on magnetohydrodynamics is contained in U.S. Pat. No. 6,146,103 for micromachined magnetohydrodynamic actuators and sensors to Abraham P. Lee and Asuncion V. Lemoff, patented Nov. 14, 2000. As stated in U.S. Pat. No. 6,146,103, “Microfluidics is the field for manipulating fluid samples and reagents in minute quantities, such as in micromachined channels, to enable handheld bioinstrumentation and diagnostic tools with quicker process speeds. The ultimate goal is to integrate pumping, valving, mixing, reaction, and detection on a chip for biotechnological, chemical, environmental, and health care applications. Most micropumps developed thus far have been complicated, both in fabrication and design, and often are difficult to reduce in size, negating many integrated fluidic applications. Most pumps have a moving component to indirectly pump the fluid, generating pulsatile flow instead of continuous flow. With moving parts involved, dead volume is often a serious problem, causing cross-contamination in biological sensitive processes. The present invention utilizes MHDs for microfluid propulsion and fluid sensing, the microfabrication methods for such a pump, and the integration of multiple pumps for a microfluidic system. MHDs is the application of Lorentz force law on fluids to propel or pump fluids. Under the Lorentz force law, charged particles moving in a uniform magnetic field feel a force perpendicular to both the motion and the magnetic field. It has thus been recognized that in the microscale, the MHD forces are substantial for propulsion of fluids through microchannels as actuators, such as a micropump, micromixer, or microvalve, or as sensors, such as a microflow meter, or viscosity meter. This advantageous scaling phenomenon also lends itself to micromachining by integrating microchannels with micro-electrodes.” The disclosure of U.S. Pat. No. 6,146,103 is incorporated herein by reference.


The means for performing PCR on the partitioned sections of the sample can be a system for alternately heating and cooling the immiscible slugs 406, 407, and 408. Alternatively, the means for performing PCR on the partitioned sections of the sample can be a system for alternately heating and cooling the immiscible slugs 406, 407, and 408 can be a system for moving the immiscible slugs 406, 407, and 408 through zones for heating and cooling. An example of such a system is shown in U.S. patent application No. 2002/0127152 published Sep. 12, 2002 for a convectively driven PCR thermal-cycling system described as follows: “A polymerase chain reaction system provides an upper temperature zone and a lower temperature zone in a fluid sample. Channels set up convection cells in the fluid sample and move the fluid sample repeatedly through the upper and lower temperature zone creating thermal cycling.” The disclosure of U.S. Patent Application No. 2002/0127152 is incorporated herein by reference.


In another embodiment of the invention, the DNA-containing solution is partitioned by adding a gelling agent to the solution to form cells of partitioned volumes of fluid separated by the gelling agent. Using this approach for fluid partitioning, the DNA-containing solution is gelled in a tube or as a very thin layer. For example, it can be in a thin layer between flat plates and the surface of the thin film can be optically probed spatially in directions parallel to the film surface to detect micro-regions in the film where the colorimetric indicator suggests the presence of the target DNA.


Another embodiment of the invention is to partition the DNA-containing solution as microdroplets in an immiscible fluid where the droplets are arranged in a two-dimensional array such that the array of microdroplets can be optically probed to detect the colorimetric indicator which signals the presence of the target DNA. In this approach a solid hydrophobic substrate supports the microdroplets. For example, in small indentations, and the immiscible “partitioning” fluid is less dense than the aqueous DNA-containing solution.


In another embodiment of the invention the DNA-containing solution is partitioned using mechanical means. For example, the DNA-containing solution can be partitioned into an array of capillaries, microtubes, or wells. In this approach, the micro vessels holding each partitioned fluid volume can be scanned optically to detect the colorimetric indicator signaling the presence of the target DNA.


Referring now to FIGS. 5A, 5B, and 5C example representations of the mechanical partitioning approach for DNA detection using fluid partitioning are shown. In FIG. 5A a line of capillaries or micro-tubes 501 are used for partitioning and holding the DNA containing solution. In FIG. 5B an array 502 of capillaries or micro-tubes are used for partitioning the DNA-containing solution. In FIG. 5C a microwells or micro-vessels unit 503 is used for partitioning and holding the DNA-containing solution.


While the invention may be susceptible to various modifications and alternative forms, specific embodiments have been shown by way of example in the drawings and have been described in detail herein. However, it should be understood that the invention is not intended to be limited to the particular forms disclosed. Rather, the invention is to cover all modifications, equivalents, and alternatives falling within the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the following appended claims.

Claims
  • 1. An apparatus for nucleic acid amplification of a sample, comprising: means for partitioning said sample into partitioned sections, wherein said means for partitioning said sample into partitioned sections comprises an injection orifice, andmeans for performing PCR on said partitioned sections of said sample.
  • 2. The apparatus for nucleic acid amplification of a sample of claim 1 wherein said injection orifice is an injection orifice that produces microdroplets.
  • 3. The apparatus for nucleic acid amplification of a sample of claim 1 wherein said injection orifice is an injection orifice that injects said sample and a PCR reagent.
  • 4. The apparatus for nucleic acid amplification of a sample of claim 1 wherein said means for performing PCR on said partitioned sections of said sample comprises a continuous tube for circulating said partitioned sections of said sample through a heater to perform PCR.
  • 5. The apparatus for nucleic acid amplification of a sample of claim 1 wherein said means for performing PCR on said partitioned sections of said sample comprises a continuous tube for circulating said partitioned sections of said sample through a heater and cooler to perform PCR.
  • 6. The apparatus for nucleic acid amplification of a sample of claim 1 wherein said means for performing PCR on said partitioned sections of said sample comprises a pump, a continuous tube, and a heater.
  • 7. The apparatus for nucleic acid amplification of a sample of claim 1 including means for detection and analysis of said partitioned sections of said sample comprising a laser and a detector.
  • 8. The apparatus for nucleic acid amplification of a sample of claim 1 including means for detection and analysis of said partitioned sections of said sample comprising a blue laser and a detector.
  • 9. The apparatus for nucleic acid amplification of a sample of claim 1 wherein said means for partitioning said sample into partitioned sections comprises means for separating said sample into immiscible slugs.
  • 10. A method of nucleic acid amplification of a sample, comprising the steps of: partitioning said sample into partitioned sections, wherein said step of partitioning said sample into partitioned sections comprises flowing said sample through an injection orifice, andsubjecting said partitioned sections of said sample to PCR.
  • 11. A method of nucleic acid amplification of a sample, the method comprising the steps a. providing an aqueous solution, wherein the aqueous solution comprises components for performing nucleic acid amplification and an input sample comprising a plurality of nucleic acids;b. providing an immiscible partitioning fluid;c. providing a solid substrate, wherein the solid substrate comprises a two-dimensional array of small indentations;d. contacting the aqueous solution with the immiscible partitioning fluid on the solid substrate, wherein the immiscible partitioning fluid is less dense than the aqueous solution, wherein the solid substrate is configured such that the contacting the aqueous solution with the immiscible partitioning fluid partitions the input sample comprising the plurality of nucleic acids into one or more microdroplets, and wherein the one or more microdroplets are further partitioned into and held by the two-dimensional array of small indentations; ande. performing nucleic acid amplification of the one or more microdroplets held by the two-dimensional array of small indentations.
  • 12. The method of claim 11, wherein the solid substrate is hydrophobic.
  • 13. The method of claim 11, wherein the nucleic acid amplification step comprises alternately heating and cooling the solid substrate.
  • 14. The method of claim 11, wherein the nucleic acids comprise a target DNA.
  • 15. The method of claim 12, wherein the one or more microdroplets contain, on average, a single template of the target DNA, and wherein the single template is amplified within the one or more microdroplets.
  • 16. The method of claim 11, wherein the components for performing nucleic acid amplification comprise one or more polymerase chain reaction (PCR) reagents.
  • 17. The method of claim 11, wherein the method further comprises detecting one or more products of the nucleic acid amplification.
  • 18. The method of claim 17, wherein the detecting comprises optically detecting.
  • 19. The method of claim 18, wherein the optically detecting comprises confocal imaging.
  • 20. The method of claim 18, wherein the optically detecting comprises laser excitation.
  • 21. The method of claim 18, wherein the optically detecting comprises fluorescent detection.
  • 22. The method of claim 18, wherein the optically detecting comprises detecting a colorimetric indicator.
  • 23. The method of claim 18, wherein the optically detecting comprises signaling the presence of a target nucleic acid.
  • 24. The method of claim 11, wherein the nucleic acid amplification comprises multiple heating and cooling cycles.
  • 25. The method of claim 24, wherein the number of cycles is sufficient to detect products of the nucleic acid amplification.
  • 26. The method of claim 11, wherein the one or more microdroplets have a volume of about 5×10−9 to 10−12 liters.
Parent Case Info

More than one reissue application has been filed for the reissue of U.S. Pat. No. 7,041,481, the reissue applications are application Ser. No. 16/115,187, filed Aug. 28, 2018, which is a continuation reissue application of reissue of application Ser. No. 15/421,141, filed Jan. 31, 2017, now U.S. Pat. No. Re. RE47,080, issued Oct. 8, 2018, which is a continuation reissue application of reissue application Ser. No. 14/701,392, filed Apr. 30, 2015, now U.S. Pat. No. Re. RE46,322, issued Feb. 28, 2017, which is a continuation reissue application of application Ser. No. 13/436,693, filed Mar. 30, 2012, now U.S. Pat. No. Re. 45,539, issued Jun. 2, 2015 which is a continuation reissue application of application Ser. No. 12/891,733, filed Sep. 27, 2010, issued as U.S. Pat. No. Re. 43,365, which is a continuation reissue application of reissue application Ser. No. 12/118,418, filed May 9, 2008, issued as U.S. Pat. No. Re. 41,780, which is a reissue application of U.S. Pat. No. 7,041,481. The present application is a Reissue of application Ser. No. 10/389,130, filed Mar. 14, 2003, issued as U.S. Pat. No. 7,041,481 on May 9, 2006 and adds new claims relative to U.S. Pat. No. 7,041,481.

Government Interests

The United States Government has rights in this invention pursuant to Contract No. W-7405-ENG-48 between the United States Department of Energy and the University of California for the operation of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory.This invention was made with government support under W-7405-ENG-48 awarded by United States Department of Energy. The government has certain rights in the invention.

US Referenced Citations (162)
Number Name Date Kind
3575220 Davis et al. Apr 1971 A
4283262 Cormier et al. Aug 1981 A
4801529 Perlman Jan 1989 A
4948961 Hillman et al. Aug 1990 A
5091652 Mathies et al. Feb 1992 A
5176203 Larzul Jan 1993 A
5270183 Corbett et al. Dec 1993 A
5376252 Ekstrom et al. Dec 1994 A
5422277 Connelly et al. Jun 1995 A
5585069 Zanzucchi et al. Dec 1996 A
5587128 Wilding et al. Dec 1996 A
5602756 Atwood et al. Feb 1997 A
5736314 Hayes et al. Apr 1998 A
5827480 Haff et al. Oct 1998 A
5842787 Kopf-Sill et al. Dec 1998 A
5846735 Stapleton Dec 1998 A
5856174 Lipshutz et al. Jan 1999 A
5858187 Ramsey et al. Jan 1999 A
5912945 Da Silva et al. Jun 1999 A
5928907 Woudenberg et al. Jul 1999 A
5945334 Besemer et al. Aug 1999 A
5972716 Ragusa et al. Oct 1999 A
6033880 Haff et al. Mar 2000 A
6057149 Burns et al. May 2000 A
6126899 Woudenberg et al. Oct 2000 A
6130098 Handique et al. Oct 2000 A
6143496 Brown et al. Nov 2000 A
6146103 Lee et al. Nov 2000 A
6156181 Parce et al. Dec 2000 A
6174673 Short et al. Jan 2001 B1
6175669 Colston et al. Jan 2001 B1
6176609 Cleveland et al. Jan 2001 B1
6177479 Nakajima et al. Jan 2001 B1
6221654 Quake et al. Apr 2001 B1
6281254 Nakajima et al. Aug 2001 B1
6337740 Parce Jan 2002 B1
6344325 Quake et al. Feb 2002 B1
6357907 Cleveland et al. Mar 2002 B1
6384915 Everett et al. May 2002 B1
6391559 Brown et al. May 2002 B1
6403338 Knapp et al. Jun 2002 B1
6429025 Parce et al. Aug 2002 B1
6440706 Vogelstein et al. Aug 2002 B1
6466713 Everett et al. Oct 2002 B2
6479299 Parce et al. Nov 2002 B1
6488895 Kennedy Dec 2002 B1
6494104 Kawakita et al. Dec 2002 B2
6509085 Kennedy Jan 2003 B1
6521427 Evans Feb 2003 B1
6522407 Everett et al. Feb 2003 B2
6524456 Ramsey et al. Feb 2003 B1
6540895 Spence et al. Apr 2003 B1
6551841 Wilding et al. Apr 2003 B1
6558916 Veerapandian et al. May 2003 B2
6575188 Parunak Jun 2003 B2
6602472 Zimmermann et al. Aug 2003 B1
6637463 Lei et al. Oct 2003 B1
6660367 Yang et al. Dec 2003 B1
6663619 Odrich et al. Dec 2003 B2
6664044 Sato Dec 2003 B1
6670153 Stern Dec 2003 B2
6767706 Quake et al. Jul 2004 B2
6773566 Shenderov Aug 2004 B2
6833242 Quake et al. Dec 2004 B2
6900021 Harrison et al. May 2005 B1
6905885 Colston et al. Jun 2005 B2
6960437 Enzelberger et al. Nov 2005 B2
6964846 Shuber Nov 2005 B1
7010391 Handique et al. Mar 2006 B2
7041481 Anderson et al. May 2006 B2
7052244 Fouillet et al. May 2006 B2
7081336 Bao et al. Jul 2006 B2
7091048 Parce et al. Aug 2006 B2
7094379 Fouillet et al. Aug 2006 B2
7118910 Unger et al. Oct 2006 B2
7129091 Ismagilov et al. Oct 2006 B2
7188731 Brown et al. Mar 2007 B2
7192557 Wu et al. Mar 2007 B2
7198897 Wangh et al. Apr 2007 B2
7238268 Ramsey et al. Jul 2007 B2
7244567 Chen et al. Jul 2007 B2
7252943 Griffiths et al. Aug 2007 B2
7268167 Higuchi et al. Sep 2007 B2
7268179 Brown Sep 2007 B2
7270786 Parunak et al. Sep 2007 B2
7279146 Nassef et al. Oct 2007 B2
7294503 Quake et al. Nov 2007 B2
7312085 Chou et al. Dec 2007 B2
7323305 Leamon et al. Jan 2008 B2
7368233 Shuber et al. May 2008 B2
7459315 Brown Dec 2008 B2
7514210 Holliger Apr 2009 B2
7595195 Lee et al. Sep 2009 B2
7622280 Holliger et al. Nov 2009 B2
7682565 Linton et al. Mar 2010 B2
RE41780 Anderson et al. Sep 2010 E
7833708 Enzelberger et al. Nov 2010 B2
7842457 Berka et al. Nov 2010 B2
7927797 Nobile et al. Apr 2011 B2
7972778 Brown et al. Jul 2011 B2
8067159 Brown et al. Nov 2011 B2
RE43365 Anderson et al. May 2012 E
8257925 Brown et al. Sep 2012 B2
8278071 Brown et al. Oct 2012 B2
8304193 Ismagilov et al. Nov 2012 B2
RE45539 Anderson et al. Jun 2015 E
9127310 Larson et al. Sep 2015 B2
RE46322 Anderson et al. Feb 2017 E
9968933 Ismagilov et al. May 2018 B2
RE47080 Anderson Oct 2018 E
20010000752 Franzen May 2001 A1
20010039014 Bass et al. Nov 2001 A1
20010041357 Fouillet et al. Nov 2001 A1
20010046701 Schulte et al. Nov 2001 A1
20020021866 Everett et al. Feb 2002 A1
20020058332 Quake et al. May 2002 A1
20020093655 Everett et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020119459 Griffiths Aug 2002 A1
20020141903 Parunak et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020164820 Brown Nov 2002 A1
20030003441 Colston et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030027244 Colston et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030032172 Colston, Jr. et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030170698 Gascoyne et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030204130 Colston, Jr. et al. Oct 2003 A1
20040038385 Langlois et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040074849 Brown et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040171055 Brown Sep 2004 A1
20040180346 Anderson et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040185484 Costa et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040208792 Linton et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040224325 Knapp et al. Nov 2004 A1
20050032240 Lee et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050042639 Knapp et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050042684 Aehle et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050064460 Holliger et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050079510 Berka et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050221279 Carter et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050221373 Enzelberger et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050227264 Nobile et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050239192 Nasarabadi et al. Oct 2005 A1
20060057599 Dzenitis et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060094108 Yoder et al. May 2006 A1
20060172336 Higuchi et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060263264 Bohm et al. Nov 2006 A1
20070227890 Ramsey et al. Oct 2007 A1
20080138815 Brown et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080145923 Hahn et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080153091 Brown et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080160525 Brown et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080161420 Shuber Jul 2008 A1
20080166793 Beer et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080169184 Brown et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080171324 Brown et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080171325 Brown et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080171326 Brown et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080171327 Brown et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080171380 Brown et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080171382 Brown et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080213766 Brown et al. Sep 2008 A1
20090035838 Quake et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090325236 Griffiths et al. Dec 2009 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (23)
Number Date Country
2004-225691 Oct 2004 AU
0672834 Sep 1995 EP
0843589 May 1998 EP
1053790 Nov 2000 EP
1522582 Jul 2007 EP
WO 198402000 May 1984 WO
WO 1992001812 Feb 1992 WO
WO 1994005414 Mar 1994 WO
WO 199841869 Sep 1998 WO
WO 1998047003 Oct 1998 WO
WO 200107159 Feb 2001 WO
WO 200157263 Aug 2001 WO
200222869 Mar 2002 WO
WO 2002023163 Mar 2002 WO
WO 02081490 Oct 2002 WO
WO 2002081490 Oct 2002 WO
WO 2002081729 Oct 2002 WO
WO 2003016558 Feb 2003 WO
WO 2003072258 Sep 2003 WO
WO 2003106678 Dec 2003 WO
WO 2005010145 Feb 2005 WO
WO 2005075683 Aug 2005 WO
WO 2008109878 Sep 2008 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (184)
Entry
Nisisako et al, “Droplet Formation in a microchannel network,” Lab Chip, 2002, 2, pp. 24-26 (Year: 2002).
3M Fluorinert™ Electronic Liquid FC-3283, 3M product information, 2001.
Abdelgawad, M. et al., “All-terrain droplet actuation,” Lab on a Chip, 2008, pp. 672-677, vol. 8.
ABIL® EM 90, Goldschmidt Personal Care product literature, 2003, 7 pages.
Adang, A.E., et al., “The Contribution of Combinatorial Chemistry to Lead Generation: An Interim Analysis,” Current Medical Chemistry, 2001, pp. 985-998, vol. 8.
Anarbaev, R., et al., “Klenow fragment and DNA polymerase α-primase fromserva calf thymus in water-in-oil microemulsions,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, 1998, pp. 315-324, vol. 1384.
Baroud, C., et al., “Thermocapillary Valve for Droplet Production and Sorting,” Physical Review E, 2007, pp. 046302-1 to 046302-5, vol. 75.
Beer, N., et al., “On-Chip Single-Copy Real-Time Reverse-Transcription PCR in Isolated Picoliter Droplets,” Anal. Chem., 2008, pp. 1854-1858, vol. 80, No. 6.
Beer, N. et al., On-Chip, Real-Time, Single-Copy Polymerase Chain Reaction in Picoliter Droplets, Anal. Chem., 2007, pp. 8471-8475, vol. 79, No. 22.
Bransky, A., et al., “A Microfluidic Droplet Generator Based on a Piezoelectric Actuator,” Lab Chip, 2009, pp. 516-520, vol. 9.
Carroll, N., et al., “Droplet-Based Microfluidics for Emulsion and Solvent Evaporation Synthesis of Monodisperse Mesoporous Silica Microspheres,” Langmuir, 2008, pp. 658-661, vol. 24.
Chabert, M., et al., “Droplet fusion by alternating current (AC) field electrocoalescence in microchannels,” Electrophoresis, 2005, pp. 3706-3715, vol. 26.
Chen, D. L., et al., “Using Three-Phase Flow of Immiscible Liquids to Prevent Coalescence of Droplets in Microfluidic Channels: Criteria to Identify the Third Liquid and Validation with Protein Crystallization,” Langmuir, 2007, pp., 2255-2260, vol. 23.
Clausell-Tormos, J., et al., “Droplet-Based Microfluidic Platforms for the Encapsulation and Screening and Mammalian Cells and Multicellular Organisms,” Chemistry and Biology, 2008, pp. 427-437, vol. 15.
Diehl, F., et al., “Digital quantification of mutant DNA in cancer patients,” Current Opinion in Oncology, 2007, pp. 36-42, vol. 19.
Diekema, D.J., et al., “Look before You Leap: Active Surveillance for Multidrug-Resistant Organisms,” Healthcare Epidemiology, 2007, pp. 1101-1107, vol. 44.
Dressman, D., et al., “Transforming single DNA molecules into fluorescent magnetic particles for detection and enumeration of genetic variations,”PNAS, 2003, pp. 8817-8822, vol. 100, No. 15.
Fan, J.B., et al., “Highly parallel genomic assays,” Nature Reviews, Genetics, 2006, pp. 632-644, vol. 7.
Fidalgo, L. M., et al., “Coupling Microdroplet Microreactors with Mass Spectrometry: Reading the Contents of Single Droplets Online,” Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2009, pp. 3665-3668, vol. 48.
Halloran, P.J., Letter to John H. Lee, Assistant Laboratory Counsel, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, re U.S. Appl. No. 12/118,418, filed Jun. 4, 2010, 5 pages.
Heyries, K.A., et al., “Megapixel digital PCR,” Nature Methods, 2011, 5 Pages.
Higuchi, R., et al., “Kinetic PCR Analysis: Real-time Monitoring of DNA Amplification Reactions,” Bio/Technology, 1993, pp. 1026-1030, vol. 11.
Jarvius, J., et al., “Digital quantification using amplified single-molecule detection,” Nature Methods, 2006, pp. 725-727, vol. 3, No. 9; includes supplementary information from www.nature.com website.
Kalinina, O., et al., “Nanoliter scale PCR with TaqMan detection,” Nucleic Acids Res., 1997, pp. 1999-2004, vol. 25, No. 10.
Katsura, S., et al., “Indirect Micromanipulation of Single Molecules in Water-In-Oil Emulsion,” 2001, Electrophoresis, pp. 289-293, vol. 22.
Kiss, M. M., et al., “High-Throughput Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction in Picoliter Droplets,” Anal. Chem., DOI: 10.1021/ac801276c, Nov. 17, 2008 <http://pubs.acs.org>.
Kojima, T., et al., “PCR amplification from single DNA molecules on magnetic beads in emulsion: application for high-throughput screening of transcription factor targets,” Nucleic Acids Res., 2005, vol. 33, No. 17, e150.
Kopp, M., et al., “Chemical Amplification: Continuous-Flow PCR on a Chip,” Science, 1998, pp. 1046-1048, vol. 280, [Online] [Retrieved on Sep. 22, 2009] Retrieved from the internet URL <http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/ful1/280/5366/1046.
Kumaresan, P., et al., “High-Throughput Single Copy DNA Amplification and Cell Analysis in Engineered Nanoliter Droplets,” Anal. Chem., DOI: 10.1021/ac800327d, Apr. 15, 2008 <http://pubs.acs.org>, plus supporting information.
Leamon, J. H., et al., “Overview: methods and applications for droplet compartmentalization of biology,” Nature Methods, 2006, pp. 541-543, vol. 3, No. 7.
Lin, Y. H., et al., “Droplet Formation Utilizing Controllable Moving-Wall Structures for Double-Emulsion Applications,” Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems, 2008, pp. 573-581, vol. 17 No. 3.
Link, D. R., et al., “Electric Control of Droplets in Microfluidic Devices,” Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2006, pp. 2556-2560, vol. 45.
Liu, K., et al., “Droplet-based synthetic method using microflow focusing and droplet fusion,” Microfluid Nano fluid, 2007, pp. 239-243, vol. 3.
Lo, Y. M., et al., “Digital PCR for the molecular detection of fetal chromosomal aneuploidy,” PNAS, 2007, pp. 13116-13121, vol. 104, No. 32.
Margulies, M., et al., “Genome sequencing in microfabricated high-density picloitre reactors,” Nature, 2005, pp. 376-380, vol. 437; includes supplementary information from www.nature.com website.
Margulies, M., et al., Supplementary figures from JM Rothberg, Nature, May 2005, 12 Pages.
Margulies, M., et al., Supplementary methods from JM Rothbert, Nature, May 2005, 34 Pages.
Musyanovych, A., et al., “Miniemulsion Droplets as Single Molecule Nanoreactors for Polymerase Chain Reaction,” Biomacromolecules, 2005, pp. 1824-1828, vol. 6.
Nagai, H., et al., “Development of a Microchamber Array for Picoliter PCR,” Anal. Chem., 2001, pp. 1043-1047, vol. 73, No. 5.
Nakano, M., et al., Single-molecule PCR using water-in-oil emulsion, Journal of Biotechnology, 2003, pp. 117-124, vol. 102.
Nisisako, T., et al., “Formation of Droplets Using Branch Channels in a Microfluidic Circuit,” SICE Aug. 5-7, 2002, pp. 1262-1264.
Pamme, N., “Continuous flow separations in microfluidic devices,” Lab Chip, 2007, pp. 1644-1659, vol. 7.
Pohl, G., et al., “Principle and applications of digital PCR,” Expert Rev. Mol. Diagn., 2004, pp. 41-47, vol. 4, No. 1.
Price, C. P., “Regular review: Point of care testing,” BMJ, 2001, pp. 1285-1288, vol. 322.
Roach, L. S., et al., “Controlling Nonspecific Protein Adsorption in a Plug-Based Microfluidic System by Controlling Interfacial Chemistry Using Fluorous-Phase Surfactants,” Anal. Chem., 2005, pp. 785-796, vol. 77, No. 3.
Rutledge, R. G., et al., “Mathematics of quantitative kinetic PCR and the application of standard curves,” Nucleic Acids Res., 2003, p. e93, vol. 31, No. 16.
Rutledge, R. G., “Sigmoidal curve-fitting redefines quantitative real-time PCR with the prospective of developing automated high-throughput applications,” Nucleic Acids Res., 2004, p. e178, vol. 32, No. 22.
Schneegass, I., et al., “Miniaturized Flow-through PCR with Different Template Types in a Silicon Chip Thermocycler,” Lab on a Chip, 2001, pp. 42-49, vol. 1.
U.S. Appl. No. 60/443,471, filed Jan. 29, 2003, 68 Pages.
Vogelstein, B., et al., “Digital PCR,” PNAS, 1999, pp. 9236-9241, vol. 96.
Williams, R., et al., “Amplification of complex gene libraries by emulsion PCR,” Nature Methods, 2006, pp. 545-550, vol. 3, No. 7.
Zhang, T., et al., “Behavioral Modeling and Performance Evaluation of Microelectrofluidics-Based PCR Systems Using SystemC,” IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems, 2004, pp. 843-858, vol. 23, No. 6.
Zhang, C., et al., “Miniaturized PCR chips for nucleic acid amplification and analysis: latest advances and future trends,” Nucleic Acids Res., 2007, pp. 4223-4237, vol. 35.
Zhao, Y., et al., Microparticle Concentration and Separation by Traveling-Wave Dielectrophoresis (twDEP) for Digital Microfluidics, Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems, 2007, pp. 1472-1481, vol. 16, No. 6.
Zhelev, T., et al., “Heat Integration in Micro-Fluidic Devices,” 16th European Symposium on Computer Aided Process Engineering and 9th International Symposium on Process Systems Engineering, 2006, pp. 1863-1868.
USDC, District of Massachusetts, Civil Case No. 1:19CV11587, Docket Report, retrieved from PACER, Apr. 7, 2020.
USDC, District of Massachusetts, Civil Case No. 1:19CV11587, Docket No. 1, Complaint Against Stilla Technologies, Inc., and Exhibits 1-6, filed by Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. and The University of Chicago, Jul. 22, 2019.
USDC District of Massachusetts Civil Case No. 1:19CV11587, Docket No. 19, Answer to Complaint with Jury Demand and Exhibits 1-5, filed by Stilla Technologies, Inc., Sep. 23, 2019.
USDC District of Massachusetts Civil Case No. 1:19CV11587, Docket No. 21, First Amended Answer to Complaint with Jury Demand and Counterclaim against Bio-Rad Laboratories and the University of Chicago, with Exhibits 1-9, filed by Stilla Technologies, Inc., Oct. 10, 2019.
USDC District of Massachusetts Civil Case No. 1:19CV11587, Docket No. 25, Amended Complaint Against Stilla Technologies, Inc., filed by Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., The University of Chicago, Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC and President and Fellows of Harvard College, with Exhibits 1-10, Oct. 11, 2019.
USDC District of Massachusetts Civil Case No. 1:19CV11587, Docket No. 39, Answer to Amended Complaint and Counterclaim Against Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, President and Fellows of Harvard College, and The University of Chicago, with Exhibits 1-20, filed by Stilla Technologies, Nov. 19, 2019.
USDC District of Massachusetts Civil Case No. 1:19CV11587, Docket No. 43, Stipulated Protective Order with Exhibits 1-2, Dec. 10, 2019.
USDC District of Massachusetts Civil Case No. 1:19CV11587, Docket No. 44, Stipulated E-Discovery Order with Exhibit 1, Dec. 10, 2019.
USDC District of Massachusetts Civil Case No. 1:19CV11587, Docket No. 54, Motion to Strike and Dismiss Defendants' Affirmative Defenses and Counterclaims by Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, President and Fellows of Harvard College and The University of Chicago, Dec. 17, 2019.
USDC District of Massachusetts Civil Case No. 1:19CV11587, Docket No. 55, Memorandum in Support of Motion to Strike and Dismiss Defendants' Affirmative Defenses and Counterclaims with Exhibits 1-16, by Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, President and Fellows of Harvard College and The University of Chicago, Dec. 17, 2019.
USDC District of Massachusetts Civil Case No. 1:19CV11587, Docket No. 60, Motion to Consolidate Cases by Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, President and Fellows of Harvard College and The University of Chicago, Dec. 30, 2019.
USDC District of Massachusetts Civil Case No. 1:19CV11587, Docket No. 61, Memorandum in Support of Motion to Consolidate Cases by Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, President and Fellows of Harvard College and The University of Chicago, Dec. 30, 2019.
USDC District of Massachusetts Civil Case No. 1:19CV11587, Docket No. 64, Opposition to Motion to Strike and Dismiss Defendants' Affirmative Defenses and Counterclaims filed by Stilla Technologies, Inc., Jan. 7, 2020.
USDC District of Massachusetts Civil Case No. 1:19CV11587, Docket No. 68, Order Denying Motion to Strike and Dismiss Defendants' Affirmative Defenses and Counterclaims, Jan. 8, 2020.
USDC District of Massachusetts Civil Case No. 1:19CV11587, Docket No. 73, Plaintiffs' Unopposed Motion for Leave to Amend Preliminary Patent-Related Disclosures by Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, President and Fellows of Harvard College and the University of Chicago, Jan. 10, 2020.
USDC District of Massachusetts Civil Case No. 1:19CV11587, Docket No. 74, Order Granting Plaintiffs' Unopposed Motion for Leave to Amend Preliminary Patent-Related Disclosures by Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, President and Fellows of Harvard College and The University of Chicago, Jan. 13, 2020.
USDC District of Massachusetts Civil Case No. 1:19CV11587, Docket No. 75, Opposition to Motion to Consolidate Cases filed by Stilla Technologies, Jan. 13, 2020.
USDC District of Massachusetts Civil Case No. 1:19CV11587, Docket No. 76, Opposition to Motion to Consolidate Cases filed by Genomics, Inc., Jan. 13, 2020.
USDC District of Massachusetts Civil Case No. 1:19CV11587, Docket No. 77, Declaration re Opposition to Motion to Consolidate Cases filed by Genomics, Inc., Jan. 13, 2020.
USDC District of Massachusetts Civil Case No. 1:19CV11587, Docket No. 78, Order Granting Motion to Consolidate Cases, Jan. 14, 2020.
USDC District of Massachusetts Civil Case No. 1:19CV11587, Docket No. 82, Document Disclosure and Attachments 1-4, by Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, President and Fellows of Harvard College and The University of Chicago, Jan. 14, 2020.
USDC District of Massachusetts Civil Case No. 1:19CV11587, Docket No. 83, Plaintiffs' Answer to Counterclaim of Stilla Technologies, filed by Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, President and Fellows of Harvard College and The University of Chicago, Jan. 22, 2020.
USDC District of Massachusetts Civil Case No. 1:19CV11587, Docket No. 85, Order Granting Protective Order as Modified with Exhibits 1-2, Feb. 11, 2020.
USDC District of Massachusetts Civil Case No. 1:19CV11587, Docket No. 89, Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement by Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Mar. 12, 2020.
USDC District of Massachusetts Civil Case No. 1:19CV11587, Docket No. 90, Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement by Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., President and Fellows of Harvard College and The University of Chicago, Mar. 12, 2020.
USDC, District of Massachusetts, Civil Action No. 1:19-cv-11587-WGY, Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. et al. v. Stilla Technologies Inc. et al., Docket 111, Declaration of Luc Bousse Regarding Claim Construction with Exhibits A-BB, filed Jul. 20, 2020, 1106 pages.
USDC, District of Massachusetts, Civil Action No. 1:19-cv-11587-WGY, Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. et al. v. Stilla Technologies Inc. et al., Docket 108, Plaintiffs' Opening Claim Constrcution Brief, filed Jul. 20, 2020, 27 pages.
USDC, District of Massachusetts, Civil Action No. 1:19-cv-11587-WGY, Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. et al. v. Stilla Technologies Inc. et al., Docket 109, Declaration of Justin L. Constant in Support of Plaintiffs' Opening Claim construction Brief, filed Jul. 20, 2020, 2 pages.
USDC, District of Massachusetts, Civil Action No. 1:19-cv-11587-WGY, Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. et al. v. Stilla Technologies Inc. et al., Docket 110, Defendants' Opeining Claim Construction Brief, filed Jul. 20, 2020, 25 pages.
USDC, District of Massachusetts, Civil Action No. 1:19-cv-11587-WGY, Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. et al. v. Stilla Technologies Inc. et al., Docket 112, Motion for Leave to File Amended Claim Constrction Statement, filed Jul. 20, 2020, 3 pages.
USDC, District of Massachusetts, Civil Action No. 1:19-cv-11587-WGY, Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. et al. v. Stilla Technologies Inc. et al., Docket 120, Amended Claim Construction Statement, filed Jul. 29, 2020, 7 pages.
USDC, District of Massachusetts, Civil Action No. 1:19-cv-11587-WGY, Docket Report, retrieved from PACER, Sep. 21, 2020, 28 pages.
USDC, District of Massachusetts, Civil Action No. 1:19-cv-11587-WGY, Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. et al. v. Stilla Technologies Inc. et al., Docket 134, Defendants' Responsive Claim Construction Brief, filed Aug. 20, 2020, 26 pages.
USDC, District of Massachusetts, Civil Action No. 1:19-cv-11587-WGY, Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. et al. v. Stilla Technologies Inc. et al., Docket 135, Plaintiffs' Responsive Claim Construction Brief, filed Aug. 20, 2020, 25 pages.
USDC, District of Massachusetts, Civil Action No. 1:19-cv-11587-WGY, Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. et al. v. Stilla Technologies Inc. et al., Docket 136, Declaration of Justin L Constant in Support of Bio-Rad's Claim Construction Brief, Filed Aug. 20, 2020, 2 pages.
USDC, District of Massachusetts, Civil Action No. 1:19-cv-11587-WGY, Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. et al. v. Stilla Technologies Inc. et al., Docket 139, Joint Statement of Counsel Regarding Markman Hearing, filed Aug. 26, 2020, 7 pages.
USDC, District of Massachusetts, Civil Action No. 1:19-cv-11587-WGY, Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. et al. v. Stilla Technologies Inc. et al., Docket 143, Plaintiffs' Markman Hearing Presentation, filed Sep. 10, 2020, 139 pages.
USDC, District of Massachusetts, Civil Action No. 1:19-cv-11587-WGY, Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. et al. v. Stilla Technologies Inc. et al., Docket 144, Claim Construction Presentation, filed Sep. 10, 2020, 84 pages.
USDC, District of Massachusetts, Civil Action No. 1:19-cv-11587-WGY, Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. et al. v. Stilla Technologies Inc. et al., Docket 150, Transcript of Markman Hearing held on Sep. 10, 2020, filed Sep. 22, 2020, 50 pages.
USDC, District of Massachusetts, Civil Action No. 1:19-cv-11587-WGY, Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. et al. v. Stilla Technologies Inc. et al., Docket 155, Claim Construction Memorandum and Order, filed Oct. 23, 2020, 42 pages.
USDC, District of Massachusetts, Civil Action No. 1:19-cv-11587-WGY, Docket Report, retrieved from PACER, Feb. 19, 2021, 33 pages.
Carl D. Meinhart Curriculum Vitae, May 2020.
Case No. IPR2021-00218, Docket Report, retrieved from DocketNavigator, Feb. 24, 2021, 4 pages.
Case No. IPR2021-00302, Docket Report, retrieved from DocketNavigator, Feb. 25, 2021, 2 pages.
Curcio et al., “Continuous Segmented-Flow Polymerase Chain Reaction for High-Throughput Miniaturized DNA Amplification,” Analytical Chemistry, 2003, 75(1):1-7.
He et al., “Capillary-based fully integrated and automated system for nanoliter polymerase chain reaction analysis directly from cheek cells,” Journal of Chromatography A, 2001, 924:271-284.
Katsura et al., “Indirect micromanipulation of single molecules in water-in-oil emulsion,” Electrophoresis, 2001, 22:289-293.
Kopp et al., “Chemical Amplification: Continuous-Flow PCR on a Chip,” Science, 1998, 280:1046-1048.
Lagally et al., “Monolithic integrated microfluidic DNA amplification and capillary electrophoresis analysis system,” Sensors and Actuators B, 2000, 63:138-146.
Litborn et al., “Synthesis and Analysis of Chemical Components in Nanoscale,” Micro Total Analysis Systems, 2000, 447-454.
Merriam-Webster's Collegiate Dictionary, Tenth Edition, 2002, p. 600.
Oxford Dictionary of Mechanical Engineering, 2013, p. 242.
Oxford Dictionary of Mechanical Engineering, 2013, p. 394.
Response to First Office Action in Ex Parte Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 8,304,193 filed Jun. 12, 2018.
Schneegass et al., “Flow-through polymerase chain reactions in chip thermocyclers,” Review in Molecular Biotechnology, 2001, 82:101-121.
USDC, District of Delaware, Civil Action No. 20-cv-506-RGA, Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. et al. v. Dropworks Inc., Docket 1, Complaint filed with Jury Demand against Dropworks, Inc.—filed by The University of Chicago, Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., filed Apr. 14, 2020, 474 pages.
USDC, District of Delaware, Civil Action No. 20-cv-506-RGA, Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. et al. v. Dropworks Inc., Docket 14, First Amended Complaint against Dropworks, Inc.—filed by The University of Chicago, Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Lawrence Livermore National Security LLC, filed Jul. 6, 2020, 547 pages.
USDC, District of Delaware, Civil Action No. 20-cv-506-RGA, Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. et al. v. Dropworks Inc., Docket 15, Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) U.S. Pat. No. 8,304,193 B2; U.S. Pat. No. 9,127,310 B2; U.S. Pat. No. Re. 41,780 E; U.S. Pat. No. Re. 43,365 E, filed Jul. 6, 2020, 1 page.
USDC, District of Delaware, Civil Action No. 20-cv-506-RGA, Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. et al. v. Dropworks Inc., Docket 16, Answer to 14 Amended Complaint, with Jury Demand, and Counterclaims against Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Lawrence Livermore National Security LLC, The University of Chicago, by Dropworks, Inc., filed Jul. 27, 2020, 26 pages.
USDC, District of Delaware, Civil Action No. 20-cv-506-RGA, Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. et al. v. Dropworks Inc., Docket 27, Second Amended Complaint against Dropworks, Inc.—filed by The University of Chicago, Lawrence Livermore National Security LLC, Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., President and Fellows of Harvard College, filed Aug. 12, 2020, 600 pages.
USDC, District of Delaware, Civil Action No. 20-cv-506-RGA, Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. et al. v. Dropworks Inc., Docket 28, Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) U.S. Pat. No. 8,304,193 B2; U.S. Pat. No. 9,127,310 B2; U.S. Pat. No. Re. 41,780 E; U.S. Pat. No. RE. 43,365 E; U.S. Pat. No. 9,056,289, filed Aug. 12, 2020, 1 page.
USDC, District of Delaware, Civil Action No. 20-cv-506-RGA, Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. et al. v. Dropworks Inc., Docket 3, Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) U.S. Pat. No. 8,304,193 B2; U.S. Pat. No. 9,127,310 B2, filed Apr. 14, 2020, 1 page.
USDC, District of Delaware, Civil Action No. 20-cv-506-RGA, Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. et al. v. Dropworks Inc., Docket 33, Answer to 27 Amended Complaint, with Jury Demand and Counterclaims against Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Lawrence Livermore National Security LLC, President and Fellows of Harvard College, The University of Chicago, by Dropworks, Inc. filed Aug. 26, 2020, 33 pages.
USDC, District of Delaware, Civil Action No. 20-cv-506-RGA, Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. et al. v. Dropworks Inc., Docket 40, Answer to 33 Answer to Amended Complaint, and Counterclaims, by Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Lawrence Livermore National Security LLC, President and Fellows of Harvard College, The University of Chicago, filed Sep. 16, 2020, 13 pages.
USDC, District of Delaware, Civil Action No. 20-cv-506-RGA, Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. et al. v. Dropworks Inc., Docket 44, Letter to the Honorable Richard G. Andrews from Jason J. Rawnsley regarding Petitions of inter partes review of U.S. Pat. No. 9,127,310 and U.S. Pat. No. Re. 41,780, filed Nov. 23, 2020, 167 pages.
USDC, District of Delaware, Civil Action No. 20-cv-506-RGA, Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. et al. v. Dropworks Inc., Docket 55, Letter to the Honorable Richard G. Andrews from Jason J. Rawnsley regarding Petition for inter partes review, filed Jan. 5, 2021, 72 pages.
USDC, District of Delaware, Civil Action No. 20-cv-506-RGA, Docket Report, retrieved from PACER, Feb. 24, 2021, 15 pages.
USPTO, U.S. Appl. No. 60/394,544, Ismagilov, “Device and Method for Pressure-Driven Plug Transport,” filed Jul. 8, 2002.
USPTO, Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Case No. IPR2021-00218, Dropworks Inc. et al. v. Lawrence Livermore National Security LLC, Docket 1, Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. Re. 41,780, filed Nov. 18, 2020, 83 pages.
USPTO, Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Case No. IPR2021-00218, Dropworks Inc. et al. v. Lawrence Livermore National Security LLC, Docket 1009, Meinhart Decl Nov. 18, 2020, filed Nov. 18, 2020, 116 pages.
USPTO, Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Case No. IPR2021-00218, Dropworks Inc. et al. v. Lawrence Livermore National Security LLC Docket 1022, Petition for Inter Partes Review Case No. IPR2021-00100 Dropworks Inc. et al. v. The University of Chicago et al., filed Oct. 22, 2020, 87 pages.
USPTO, Patent Trial and Appeal Board, IPR Trial No. 2021-00302, Dropworks Inc. et al. v. Lawrence Livermore National Security LLC, Docket 3, Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. Re. 43,365, filed Dec. 8, 2020, 70 pages.
Woolley et al., “Functional Integration of PCR Amplification and Capillary Electrophoresis in a Microfabricated DNA Analysis Device,” Analytical Chemistry, 1996, 68(23):4081-4086.
Case No. 1:19cv11587, Docket Report, retrieved from LexisNexis, Jun. 4, 2021, 40 pages.
Case No. 1:20cv506, Docket Report, retrieved from LexisNexis, Jun. 4, 2021, 17 pages.
Case No. IPR2021-00218, Docket Report, retrieved from LexisNexis, Jun. 4, 2021, 18 pages.
Case No. IPR2021-00302, Docket Report, retrieved from LexisNexis, Jun. 4, 2021, 16 pages.
J. R. Burns, et al., “The intensification of rapid reactions in multiphase systems using slug flow in capillaries,” Lab on a Chip, 2001, 1:10-15.
Lagally, et al., “Single-Molecule DNA Amplification and Analysis in an Integrated Microfluidic Device,” Anal. Cherm., 2001, 73(3):565-570.
M.A. Burns, et al., “Microfabricated structures for integrated DNA analysis,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 1996, 93:5556-5561.
USDC, District of Delaware, Civil Action No. 1:15-cv-00152-RGA, Document 218, filed Sep. 1, 2017, 5 pages.
USDC, District of Delaware, Civil Action No. 1:20-cv-00506-RGA, Document 72, filed Mar. 8, 2021, 1 page.
USDC, District of Delaware, Civil Action No. 1:20-cv-00506-RGA, Document 74, filed Mar. 15, 2021, 173 pages.
USDC, District of Delaware, Civil Action No. 1:20-cv-00506-RGA, Document 77, filed Mar. 22, 2021, 44 pages.
USDC, District of Delaware, Civil Action No. 1:20-cv-00506-RGA, Document 80, filed Apr. 5, 2021, 16 pages.
USDC, District of Delaware, Civil Action No. 1:20-cv-00506-RGA, Document 85, filed Apr. 30, 2021, 809 pages.
USDC, District of Delaware, Civil Action No. 1:20-cv-00506-RGA, Document 86, filed Apr. 30, 2021, 816 pages.
USDC, District of Massachusetts, Civil Action No. 1:19-cv-11587-WGY, Document 166, filed Feb. 28, 2021, 12 pages.
USDC, District of Massachusetts, Civil Action No. 1:19-cv-11587-WGY, Document 167, filed Feb. 28, 2021, 292 pages.
USDC, District of Massachusetts, Civil Action No. 1:19-cv-11587-WGY, Document 172, filed Mar. 15, 2021, 38 pages.
USDC, District of Massachusetts, Civil Action No. 1:19-cv-11587-WGY, Document 180, filed Apr. 14, 2021, 442 pages.
USDC, District of Massachusetts, Civil Action No. 1:19-cv-11587-WGY, Document 184, filed Apr. 14, 2021, 65 pages.
USDC, District of Massachusetts, Civil Action No. 1:19-cv-11587-WGY, Document 187, filed Apr. 15, 2021, 16 pages.
USDC, District of Massachusetts, Civil Action No. 1:19-cv-11587-WGY, Document 188, filed Apr. 15, 2021, 22 pages.
USDC, District of Massachusetts, Civil Action No. 1:19-cv-11587-WGY, Document 189, filed Apr. 15, 2021, 364 pages.
USPTO, Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Case No. IPR2021-00218, “Email chain between Amal Moulik and Brian Anderson,” Document 2008, filed Mar. 2, 2021, 3 pages.
USPTO, Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Case No. IPR2021-00218, “Patent Owner's Pre-lnstitution Surreply,” Document 14, filed Apr. 14, 2021, 17 pages.
USPTO, Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Case No. IPR2021-00218, “Patent Owner's Preliminary Response to Petition tor Inter Partes Review of U.S. Patent RE41,780,” Document 11, filed Mar. 2, 2021, 71 pages.
USPTO, Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Case No. IPR2021-00218, “Record of Invention Draft,” Document 2017, filed Mar. 2, 2021, 15 pages.
USPTO, Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Case No. IPR2021-00218, “Trial Instituted Document,” Document 15, filed Jun. 1, 2021, 39 pages.
USPTO, Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Case No. IPR2021-00302, “Patent Owner's Pre-lnstitution Surreply,” Document 16, filed Apr. 14, 2021, 17 pages.
USPTO, Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Case No. IPR2021-00302, “Patent Owner's Preliminary Response to Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Patent RE43,365,” Document 14, filed Mar. 17, 2021, 62 pages.
USPTO, Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Case No. IPR2021-00302, “Trial Instituted Document,” Document 17, filed Jun. 2, 2021, 41 pages.
USDC, District of Massachusetts, Civil Action No. 1:19-cv-11587-WGY, Document 192, filed Apr. 27, 2021, 126 pages.
USDC, District of Massachusetts, Civil Action No. 1:19-cv-11587-WGY, Document 193, filed Apr. 28, 2021, 37 pages.
USDC, District of Massachusetts, Civil Action No. 1:19-cv-11587-WGY, Document 194, filed May 5, 2021, 413 pages.
USDC, District of Massachusetts, Civil Action No. 1:19-cv-11587-WGY, Document 198, filed May 5, 2021, 64 pages.
USDC, District of Massachusetts, Civil Action No. 1:19-cv-11587-WGY, Document 200, filed May 5, 2021, 33 pages.
USDC, District of Massachusetts, Civil Action No. 1:19-cv-11587-WGY, Document 202, filed May 5, 2021, 37 pages.
USDC, District of Massachusetts, Civil Action No. 1:19-cv-11587-WGY, Document 204, filed May 5, 2021, 46 pages.
USDC, District of Massachusetts, Civil Action No. 1:19-cv-11587-WGY, Document 217, filed May 28, 2021, 62 pages.
USDC, District of Massachusetts, Civil Action No. 1:19-cv-11587-WGY, Document 225, filed May 28, 2021, 26 pages.
Case No. 1:19cv11587, Docket Report, retrieved from LexisNexis, Aug. 20, 2021, 46 pages.
Case No. 1:20cv506, Docket Report, retrieved from LexisNexis, Aug. 20, 2021, 18 pages.
Case No. IPR2021-00218, Docket Report, retrieved from LexisNexis, Aug. 20, 2021, 19 pages.
Case No. IPR2021-00302, Docket Report, retrieved from LexisNexis, Aug. 20, 2021, 17 pages.
USDC, District of Delaware, Civil Action No. 1:20-cv-00506-RGA, Document 102, filed Aug. 18, 2021, 13 pages.
USDC, District of Delaware, Civil Action No. 1:20-cv-00506-RGA, Document 1021-1, filed Aug. 18, 2021, 107 pages.
USDC, District of Delaware, Civil Action No. 1:20-cv-00506-RGA, Document 90, filed Jul. 13, 2021, 1 pages.
USDC, District of Delaware, Civil Action No. 1:20-cv-00506-RGA, Document 94, filed Jul. 20, 2021, 87 pages.
USDC, District of Delaware, Civil Action No. 1:20-cv-00506-RGA, Document 95, filed Jul. 20, 2021, 3 pages.
USDC, District of Delaware, Civil Action No. 1:20-cv-00506-RGA, Document 95-1, filed Jul. 20, 2021, 14 pages.
USDC, District of Delaware, Civil Action No. 1:20-cv-00506-RGA, Document 95-2, filed Jul. 20, 2021, 38 pages.
USDC, District of Delaware, Civil Action No. 1:20-cv-00506-RGA, Document 95-3, filed Jul. 20, 2021, 539 pages.
USDC, District of Delaware, Civil Action No. 1:20-c-00506-RGA, Document 95-4, filed Jul. 20, 2021, 6 pages.
USDC, District of Massachusetts, Civil Action No. 1:19-cv-11587-WGY, Document 257, filed Jun. 23, 2021, 25 pages.
USDC, District of Massachusetts, Civil Action No. 1:19-cv-11587-WGY, Document 258, filed Jun. 23, 2021, 21 pages.
USDC, District of Massachusetts, Civil Action No. 1:19-cv-11587-WGY, Document 265, filed Jun. 30, 2021, 17 pages.
USDC, District of Massachusetts, Civil Action No. 1:19-cv-11587-WGY, Document 266, filed Jul. 2, 2021, 7 pages.
Continuations (5)
Number Date Country
Parent 15421141 Jan 2017 US
Child 10389130 US
Parent 14701392 Apr 2015 US
Child 15421141 US
Parent 13436693 Mar 2012 US
Child 14701392 US
Parent 12891733 Sep 2010 US
Child 13436693 US
Parent 12118418 May 2008 US
Child 12891733 US
Reissues (2)
Number Date Country
Parent 10389130 Mar 2003 US
Child 16115187 US
Parent 10389130 Mar 2003 US
Child 12118418 US