Chemical sensor array having multiple sensors per well

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 11774401
  • Patent Number
    11,774,401
  • Date Filed
    Friday, October 7, 2022
    a year ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, October 3, 2023
    7 months ago
Abstract
In one embodiment, a device is described. The device includes a material defining a reaction region. The device also includes a plurality of chemically-sensitive field effect transistors have a common floating gate in communication with the reaction region. The device also includes a circuit to obtain respective output signals from the chemically-sensitive field effect transistors indicating an analyte within the reaction region.
Description
BACKGROUND

The present disclosure relates to sensors for chemical analysis, and to methods for manufacturing such sensors.


A variety of types of chemical sensors have been used in the detection of chemical processes. One type is a chemically-sensitive field effect transistor (chemFET). A chemFET includes a source and a drain separated by a channel region, and a chemically sensitive area coupled to the channel region. The operation of the chemFET is based on the modulation of channel conductance, caused by changes in charge at the sensitive area due to a chemical reaction occurring nearby. The modulation of the channel conductance changes the threshold voltage of the chemFET, which can be measured to detect and/or determine characteristics of the chemical reaction. The threshold voltage may for example be measured by applying appropriate bias voltages to the source and drain, and measuring a resulting current flowing through the chemFET. As another example, the threshold voltage may be measured by driving a known current through the chemFET, and measuring a resulting voltage at the source or drain.


An ion-sensitive field effect transistor (ISFET) is a type of chemFET that includes an ion-sensitive layer at the sensitive area. The presence of ions in an analyte solution alters the surface potential at the interface between the ion-sensitive layer and the analyte solution, due to the protonation or deprotonation of surface charge groups caused by the ions present in the analyte solution. The change in surface potential at the sensitive area of the ISFET affects the threshold voltage of the device, which can be measured to indicate the presence and/or concentration of ions within the solution.


Arrays of ISFETs may be used for monitoring chemical reactions, such as DNA sequencing reactions, based on the detection of ions present, generated, or used during the reactions. See, for example, U.S. Pat. No. 7,948,015 to Rothberg et al., which is incorporated by reference herein. More generally, large arrays of chemFETs or other types of chemical sensors may be employed to detect and measure static and/or dynamic amounts or concentrations of a variety of analytes (e.g. hydrogen ions, other ions, compounds, etc.) in a variety of processes. The processes may for example be biological or chemical reactions, cell or tissue cultures or monitoring neural activity, nucleic acid sequencing, etc.


An issue that arises in the operation of large scale chemical sensor arrays is the susceptibility of the sensor output signals to noise. Specifically, the noise affects the accuracy of the downstream signal processing used to determine the characteristics of the chemical and/or biological process being detected by the sensors.


It is therefore desirable to provide devices including low noise chemical sensors, and methods for manufacturing such devices.


SUMMARY

In one embodiment, a device is described. The device includes a material defining a reaction region. The device also includes a plurality of chemically-sensitive field effect transistors have a common floating gate in communication with the reaction region. The device also includes a circuit to obtain individual output signals from the chemically-sensitive field effect transistors indicating an analyte within the reaction region.


In another embodiment, a method for manufacturing a device is described. The method includes forming a material defining a reaction region. The method further includes forming a plurality of chemically-sensitive field effect transistors having a common floating gate in communication with the reaction region. The method further includes forming a circuit to obtain individual output signals from the chemically-sensitive field effect transistors indicating an analyte within the reaction region.


Particular aspects of one more implementations of the subject matter described in this specification are set forth in the drawings and the description below. Other features, aspects, and advantages of the subject matter will become apparent from the description, the drawings, and the claims.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 illustrates a block diagram of components of a system for nucleic acid sequencing.



FIG. 2 illustrates cross-sectional and expanded views of a portion of an integrated circuit device and flow cell.



FIG. 3 illustrates a schematic diagram of a portion of the integrated circuit device 100 including a sensor array having multiple chemical sensors coupled to the same reaction region.



FIG. 4 is a flow chart of an example process for calculating a resultant output signal for a group of chemical sensors coupled to a single reaction region.



FIG. 5 illustrates a cross-sectional view of portions of two groups of chemical sensors and their corresponding reaction regions according to a first embodiment.



FIGS. 6 to 10 illustrate stages in a manufacturing process for forming a device including multiple chemical sensors coupled to the same reaction region according to a first embodiment.



FIG. 11 illustrates a cross-sectional view of portions of two groups of chemical sensors and their corresponding reaction regions according to a second embodiment.



FIGS. 12 to 14 illustrate stages in a manufacturing process for forming a device including multiple chemical sensors coupled to the same reaction region according to a second embodiment.



FIGS. 15 to 18 illustrate stages in a manufacturing process for forming a device including multiple chemical sensors coupled to the same reaction region according to a third embodiment.



FIGS. 19 to 21 illustrate stages in a manufacturing process for forming a device including multiple chemical sensors coupled to the same reaction region according to a fourth embodiment.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

A chemical detection device is described that includes multiple chemical sensors for concurrently detecting a chemical reaction within the same, operationally associated reaction region. The multiple sensors can provide redundancy, as well as improved accuracy in detecting characteristics of the chemical reaction.


By utilizing multiple chemical sensors to separately detect the same chemical reaction, the individual output signals can be combined or otherwise processed to produce a resultant, low noise output signal. For example, the individual output signals can be averaged, such that the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the resultant output signal is increased by as much as the square root of the number of individual output signals. In addition, the resultant output signal can compensate for differences among the values of the individual output signals, caused by variations in chemical sensor performance which could otherwise complicate the downstream signal processing. As a result of the techniques described herein, low-noise chemical sensor output signals can be provided, such that the characteristics of reactions can be accurately detected.



FIG. 1 illustrates a block diagram of components of a system for nucleic acid sequencing according to an exemplary embodiment. The components include a flow cell 101 on an integrated circuit device 100, a reference electrode 108, a plurality of reagents 114 for sequencing, a valve block 116, a wash solution 110, a valve 112, a fluidics controller 118, lines 120/122/126, passages 104/109/111, a waste container 106, an array controller 124, and a user interface 128. The integrated circuit device 100 includes a microwell array 107 of reaction regions overlying groups of chemical sensors of a sensor array as described herein. The flow cell 101 includes an inlet 102, an outlet 103, and a flow chamber 105 defining a flow path of reagents over the microwell array 107.


The reference electrode 108 may be of any suitable type or shape, including a concentric cylinder with a fluid passage or a wire inserted into a lumen of passage 111. The reagents 114 may be driven through the fluid pathways, valves, and flow cell 101 by pumps, gas pressure, or other suitable methods, and may be discarded into the waste container 106 after exiting the outlet 103 of the flow cell 101. The fluidics controller 118 may control driving forces for the reagents 114 and the operation of valve 112 and valve block 116 with suitable software.


The microwell array 107 includes reaction regions, also referred to herein as microwells, which are operationally associated with chemical sensors of the sensor array. As described in more detail below, each reaction region is operationally associated with multiple chemical sensors suitable for detecting an analyte or reaction of interest within that reaction region. These multiple chemical sensors can provide redundancy, as well as improved detection accuracy. The microwell array 107 may be integrated in the integrated circuit device 100, so that the microwell array 107 and the sensor array are part of a single device or chip.


In exemplary embodiments described below, groups of four chemical sensors are coupled to each of the reaction regions. Alternatively, the number of chemical sensors operationally associated with a single reaction region may be different than four. More generally, two or more chemical sensors may be operationally associated with a single reaction region.


The flow cell 101 may have a variety of configurations for controlling the path and flow rate of reagents 114 over the microwell array 107. The array controller 124 provides bias voltages and timing and control signals to the integrated circuit device 100 for reading the chemical sensors of the sensor array as described herein. The array controller 124 also provides a reference bias voltage to the reference electrode 108 to bias the reagents 114 flowing over the microwell array 107.


During an experiment, the array controller 124 collects and processes individual output signals from the chemical sensors of the sensor array through output ports on the integrated circuit device 100 via bus 127. As described in more detail below, this processing can include calculating a resultant output signal for a group of sensors as a function of the individual output signals from the chemical sensors in the group. The array controller 124 may be a computer or other computing means. The array controller 124 may include memory for storage of data and software applications, a processor for accessing data and executing applications, and components that facilitate communication with the various components of the system in FIG. 1.


In the illustrated embodiment, the array controller 124 is external to the integrated circuit device 100. In some alternative embodiments, some or all of the functions performed by the array controller 124 are carried out by a controller or other data processor on the integrated circuit device 100. In yet other embodiments, a combination of resources internal and external to the integrated circuit device 100 is used to obtain the individual output signals and calculate the resultant output signal for a group of sensors using the techniques described herein.


The value of a resultant output signal for a group of chemical sensors indicates physical and/or chemical characteristics of one or more reactions taking place in the corresponding reaction region. For example, in an exemplary embodiment, the values of the resultant output signals may be further processed using the techniques disclosed in Rearick et al., U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/339,846, filed Dec. 29, 2011, based on U.S. Prov. Pat. Appl. Nos. 61/428,743, filed Dec. 30, 2010, and 61/429,328, filed Jan. 3, 2011, and in Hubbell, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/339,753, filed Dec. 29, 2011, based on U.S. Prov. Pat. Appl. No 61/428,097, filed Dec. 29, 2010, each of which are incorporated by reference herein.


The user interface 128 may display information about the flow cell 101 and the output signals received from chemical sensors of the sensor array on the integrated circuit device 100. The user interface 128 may also display instrument settings and controls, and allow a user to enter or set instrument settings and controls.


The fluidics controller 118 may control delivery of the individual reagents 114 to the flow cell 101 and integrated circuit device 100 in a predetermined sequence, for predetermined durations, at predetermined flow rates. The array controller 124 can then collect and analyze the output signals of the chemical sensors indicating chemical reactions occurring in response to the delivery of the reagents 114.


During the experiment, the system may also monitor and control the temperature of the integrated circuit device 100, so that reactions take place and measurements are made at a known predetermined temperature.


The system may be configured to let a single fluid or reagent contact the reference electrode 108 throughout an entire multi-step reaction during operation. The valve 112 may be shut to prevent any wash solution 110 from flowing into passage 109 as the reagents 114 are flowing. Although the flow of wash solution may be stopped, there may still be uninterrupted fluid and electrical communication between the reference electrode 108, passage 109, and the microwell array 107. The distance between the reference electrode 108 and the junction between passages 109 and 111 may be selected so that little or no amount of the reagents flowing in passage 109 and possibly diffusing into passage 111 reach the reference electrode 108. In an exemplary embodiment, the wash solution 110 may be selected as being in continuous contact with the reference electrode 108, which may be especially useful for multi-step reactions using frequent wash steps.



FIG. 2 illustrates cross-sectional and expanded views of a portion of the integrated circuit device 100 and flow cell 101. The integrated circuit device 100 includes the microwell array 107 of reaction regions operationally associated with sensor array 205. During operation, the flow chamber 105 of the flow cell 101 confines a reagent flow 208 of delivered reagents across open ends of the reaction regions in the microwell array 107. The volume, shape, aspect ratio (such as base width-to-well depth ratio), and other dimensional characteristics of the reaction regions may be selected based on the nature of the reaction taking place, as well as the reagents, byproducts, or labeling techniques (if any) that are employed.


The chemical sensors of the sensor array 205 are responsive to (and generate output signals related to) chemical reactions within associated reaction regions in the microwell array 107 to detect an analyte of interest. The chemical sensors of the sensor array 205 may for example be chemically sensitive field-effect transistors (chemFETs), such as ion-sensitive field effect transistors (ISFETs). Examples of chemical sensors and array configurations that may be used in embodiments are described in U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2010/0300559, No. 2010/0197507, No. 2010/0301398, No. 2010/0300895, No. 2010/0137143, and No. 2009/0026082, and U.S. Pat. No. 7,575,865, each which are incorporated by reference herein.



FIG. 3 illustrates a schematic diagram of a portion of the integrated circuit device 100 including sensor array 205 having multiple chemical sensors coupled to the same reaction region. In the illustrated embodiment, sixteen chemical sensors and four reaction regions are illustrated, representing a small section of the sensor array 205 and microwell array 107 that can include millions of chemical sensors and reaction regions.


The integrated circuit device 100 includes an access circuit for accessing the chemical sensors of the sensor array 205. In the illustrated example, the access circuit includes a row select circuit 310 coupled to the sensor array 205 via row lines 311-314. The access circuit also includes column output circuit 320 coupled to the sensor array 205 via column lines 321-328.


The row select circuit 310 and the column output circuit 320 are responsive to timing and control signals provided by the array controller 124 in FIG. 1 to select the various chemical sensors and operate the sensor array 205 as described below. The array controller 124 also provides a reference bias voltage to the reference electrode (See, FIG. 1, reference numeral 108) to bias the reagents flowing across open ends of the reaction regions 380, 382, 384, 386 of the microwell array 107 during operation.


In the illustrated embodiment, groups of four chemical sensors are operationally associated with each of the reaction regions 380, 382, 384, 386. Alternatively, the number of chemical sensors operationally associated with a single reaction region may be different than four. More generally, two or more chemical sensors may be operationally associated with a single reaction region. In some embodiments, the number of chemical sensors operationally associated with a single reaction region may be greater than four, such as sixteen or more.


The group containing chemical sensors 331.1-331.4 is representative of the groups of sensors of the sensor array 205. In the illustrated embodiment, each chemical sensor 331.1-331.4 includes a chemically-sensitive field effect transistor 341.1-341.5 and a row select switch 351.1-351.4.


The chemically-sensitive field effect transistors 341.1-341.4 have a common floating gate 370 in communication with the reaction region 380. That is, the common floating gate 370 is coupled to channels of each of the chemically-sensitive field effect transistors 341.1-341.5. The chemically-sensitive field effect transistors 341.1-341.5 may each include multiple patterned layers of conductive elements within layers of dielectric material.


The common floating gate 370 may for example include an uppermost conductive element (referred to herein as a sensor plate) that defines a surface (e.g. a bottom surface) of the reaction region 380. That is, there is no intervening deposited material layer between the uppermost electrical conductor and the surface of the reaction region 380. In some alternative embodiments, the uppermost conductive element of the common floating gate 370 is separated from the reaction region 380 by a deposited sensing material (discussed in more detail below).


In operation, reactants, wash solutions, and other reagents may move in and out of the reaction region 380 by a diffusion mechanism. The chemical sensors 331.1-331.4 are each responsive to (and generate individual output signals related to) chemical reactions within the reaction region 380 to detect an analyte or reaction property of interest. Changes in the charge within the reaction region 380 cause changes in the voltage on the common floating gate 370, which in turn changes the individual threshold voltages of each of the chemically-sensitive field effect transistors 341.1-341.4 of the sensors 331.1-331.4.


In a read operation of a selected chemical sensor 331.1, the row select circuit 310 facilitates providing a bias voltage to row line 311 sufficient to turn on row select transistor 351.1. Turning on the row select transistor 351.1 couples the drain terminal of the chemically-sensitive transistor 341.1 to the column line 321. The column output circuit 320 facilitates providing a bias voltage to the column line 321, and providing a bias current on the column line 321 that flows through the chemically-sensitive transistor 341.1. This in turn establishes a voltage at the source terminal of the chemically-sensitive transistor 341.1, which is coupled to the column line 322. In doing so, the voltage on the column line 322 is based on the threshold voltage of the chemically-sensitive transistor 341.1, and thus based on the amount of charge within the reaction region 380. Alternatively, other techniques may be used to read the selected chemical sensor 331.1.


The column output circuit 320 produces an individual output signal for the chemically-sensitive transistor 341.1 based on the voltage on the column line 322. The column output circuit 320 may include switches, sample and hold capacitors, current sources, buffers, and other circuitry used to operate and read the chemical sensors, depending upon the array configuration and read out technique. In some embodiments, the column output circuit 320 may include circuits such as those described in U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2010/0300559, No. 2010/0197507, No. 2010/0301398, No. 2010/0300895, No. 2010/0137143, and No. 2009/0026082, and U.S. Pat. No. 7,575,865, which were incorporated by reference above.


The individual output signals of the other chemical sensors 331.2-331.4 coupled to the reaction region 380 can be read out in a similar fashion. In doing so, the column output circuit 320 produces individual output signals for each of the chemical sensors 331.1-331.4.


The individual output signals for each of the chemical sensors 331.1-331.4 can then be combined or otherwise processed by the array controller 124 (or other data processor) to calculate a resultant, low noise output signal for the group of chemical sensors 331.1-331.4. For example, the resultant output signal may be an average of the individual output signals. In such a case, the SNR of the resultant output signal can be increased by as much as the square root of the number of individual output signals. In addition, the resultant output signal can compensate for differences among the values of the individual output signals, caused by variations in performance of the chemical sensors 331.1-331.4 which could otherwise complicate the downstream signal processing.



FIG. 4 is a flow chart of an example process for calculating a resultant output signal for a group of chemical sensors coupled to a single reaction region. Other embodiments may perform different or additional steps than the ones illustrated in FIG. 4. For convenience, FIG. 4 will be described with reference to a system that performs a process. The system can be for example, the system of FIG. 1.


At step 400, a chemical reaction is initiated within a reaction region coupled to a group of two or more chemical sensors. The group of chemical sensors may for example include respective chemically-sensitive field effect transistors having a common floating gate in communication with the reaction region, as described above with respect to FIG. 3. The chemical reaction may be a sequencing reaction, as described above.


At step 410, individual output signals are obtained from the chemical sensors in the group. The individual output signals may for example be obtained by selecting and reading out the individual chemical sensors using the techniques described above. In some embodiments, flowing of reagent(s) causes chemical reactions within the reaction region that release hydrogen ions, and the amplitude of the individual output signals from the chemical sensors is related to the amount of hydrogen ions detected.


At step 420, a resultant output signal for the group is calculated based on one or more of the individual output signals. The resultant output signal may for example be an average of the individual output signals. Alternatively, other techniques may be used to calculate the resultant output signal.


At step 430, a characteristic of the chemical reaction is determined based on the resultant output signal. For example, the characteristic of the chemical reaction may be determined based on the value of the resultant output signal using the techniques disclosed in Rearick et al., U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/339,846, filed Dec. 29, 2011, based on U.S. Prov. Pat. Appl. Nos. 61/428,743, filed Dec. 30, 2010, and 61/429,328, filed Jan. 3, 2011, and in Hubbell, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/339,753, filed Dec. 29, 2011, based on U.S. Prov. Pat. Appl. No 61/428,097, filed Dec. 29, 2010, each of which were incorporated by reference above.



FIG. 5 illustrates a cross-sectional view of portions of two groups of chemical sensors and their corresponding reaction regions according to a first embodiment. In FIG. 5, the chemically-sensitive field effect transistors 341.1, 341.2 of the chemical sensors 331.1, 331.2 in the group of sensors 331.1-331.4 coupled to the reaction region 380 are visible. The chemically-sensitive field effect transistors 341.3, 341.4 of the other chemical sensors 331.3, 331.4 in the group lie behind this cross-section. Similarly, the cross-section of FIG. 5 shows the chemically-sensitive field effect transistors of two chemical sensors in the group of chemical sensors that is coupled to the adjacent reaction region 382. In this illustration, the select switches of the chemical sensors, access lines and other connections are omitted for simplicity.


The chemical sensor 331.1 is representative of the group of chemical sensors 331.1-331.4. In the illustrated example, the chemically-sensitive field effect transistor 341.1 of the chemical sensor 331.1 is a chemically-sensitive field effect transistor (chemFET), more specifically an ion-sensitive field effect transistor (ISFET) in this example.


The chemically-sensitive field effect transistor 341.1 includes common floating gate 370 having a conductive element 520 coupled to the reaction region 380. The conductive element 520 is the uppermost floating gate conductor (also referred to herein as a sensor plate) in the common floating gate 370. In the embodiment illustrated in FIG. 5, the common floating gate 370 includes multiple patterned layers of conductive material within layers of dielectric material 519.


In FIG. 5, the conductive element 520 electrically connects individual multi-layer floating gate structures that extend over the channel regions of each of the chemically-sensitive field effect transistors 341.1-341.4 of the group of chemical sensors 331.1-331.4. In doing so, the common floating gate 370 is shared among the chemical sensors 331.1-331.4.


The chemically-sensitive field effect transistor 341.1 includes a source region 521 and a drain region 522 within a semiconductor substrate 354. The source region 521 and the drain region 522 comprise doped semiconductor material having a conductivity type different from the conductivity type of the substrate 554. For example, the source region 521 and the drain region 522 may comprise doped P-type semiconductor material, and the substrate may comprise doped N-type semiconductor material.


Channel region 523 separates the source region 521 and the drain region 522. The common floating gate 370 includes a conductive element 551 separated from the channel region 523 by a gate dielectric 552. The gate dielectric 552 may be for example silicon dioxide. Alternatively, other dielectrics may be used for the gate dielectric 552.


As shown in FIG. 5, the reaction region 380 is within an opening extending through dielectric material 510 to the upper surface of the conductive element 520. The dielectric material 510 may comprise one or more layers of material, such as silicon dioxide or silicon nitride. The opening in the dielectric material 510 may for example have a circular cross-section. Alternatively, the opening may be non-circular. For example, the cross-section may be square, rectangular, hexagonal, or irregularly shaped. The dimensions of the openings within the dielectric material 510, and their pitch, can vary from embodiment to embodiment.


In the illustrated embodiment, the upper surface 530 of the conductive element 520 is the bottom surface of the reaction region 380. That is, there is no intervening deposited material layer between the upper surface 530 of the conductive element 520 and the reaction region 380. As a result of this structure, the upper surface 530 of the conductive element 520 acts as the sensing surface for the group of chemical sensors 331.1-331.4. The conductive element 520 may comprise one or more of a variety of different materials to facilitate sensitivity to particular ions (e.g. hydrogen ions).


During manufacturing and/or operation of the device, a thin oxide of the electrically conductive material of the conductive element 520 may be grown on the upper surface 530 which acts as a sensing material (e.g. an ion-sensitive sensing material) for the group of chemical sensors 331.1-331.4. For example, in one embodiment the conductive element 520 may be titanium nitride, and titanium oxide or titanium oxynitride may be grown on the upper surface 530 during manufacturing and/or during exposure to solutions during use. Whether an oxide is formed depends on the conductive material, the manufacturing processes performed, and the conditions under which the device is operated.


In the illustrated example, the conductive element 520 is shown as a single layer of material. More generally, the conductive element 520 may comprise one or more layers of a variety of electrically conductive materials, such as metals or ceramics, depending upon the embodiment. The conductive material can be for example a metallic material or alloy thereof, or can be a ceramic material, or a combination thereof. An exemplary metallic material includes one of aluminum, copper, nickel, titanium, silver, gold, platinum, hafnium, lanthanum, tantalum, tungsten, iridium, zirconium, palladium, or a combination thereof. An exemplary ceramic material includes one of titanium nitride, titanium aluminum nitride, titanium oxynitride, tantalum nitride, or a combination thereof.


In some alternative embodiments, an additional conformal sensing material (not shown) is deposited on the sidewall of the opening in the dielectric material 510 and on the upper surface 530 of the sensor plate 520. In such a case, an inner surface of the deposited sensing material defines the reaction region 380. The sensing material may comprise one or more of a variety of different materials to facilitate sensitivity to particular ions. For example, silicon nitride or silicon oxynitride, as well as metal oxides such as silicon oxide, aluminum or tantalum oxides, generally provide sensitivity to hydrogen ions, whereas sensing materials comprising polyvinyl chloride containing valinomycin provide sensitivity to potassium ions. Materials sensitive to other ions such as sodium, silver, iron, bromine, iodine, calcium, and nitrate may also be used, depending upon the embodiment.


In operation, reactants, wash solutions, and other reagents may move in and out of the reaction region 580 by a diffusion mechanism 540. Each of the chemical sensors 331.1-331.4 are responsive to (and generates an output signal related to) the amount of charge 524 proximate to the conductive element 520. The presence of charge 524 in an analyte solution alters the surface potential at the interface between the analyte solution and the conductive element 520, due to the protonation or deprotonation of surface charge groups. Changes in the charge 524 cause changes in the voltage on the floating gate structure 518, which in turn changes in the threshold voltages of the chemically-sensitive transistors 341.1-341.4 of each of the chemical sensors 331.1-331.4. The respective changes in threshold voltages can be measured by measuring the current through the respective channel regions (e.g. channel region 523 of sensor 331.1). As a result, each of the chemical sensors 331.1-331.4 can be operated to provide individual current-based or voltage-based output signals on an array line connected to its corresponding source region or drain region.


In an embodiment, reactions carried out in the reaction region 380 can be analytical reactions to identify or determine characteristics or properties of an analyte of interest. Such reactions can directly or indirectly generate byproducts that affect the amount of charge 524 adjacent to the conductive element 520. If such byproducts are produced in small amounts or rapidly decay or react with other constituents, multiple copies of the same analyte may be analyzed in the reaction region 380 at the same time in order to increase the individual output signals generated by the group of chemical sensors 331.1-331.4. In an embodiment, multiple copies of an analyte may be attached to a solid phase support 512, either before or after deposition into the reaction region 380. The solid phase support 512 may be microparticles, nanoparticles, beads, solid or porous gels, or the like. For simplicity and ease of explanation, solid phase support 512 is also referred herein as a particle. For a nucleic acid analyte, multiple, connected copies may be made by rolling circle amplification (RCA), exponential RCA, Recombinase Polymerase Amplification (RPA), Polymerase Chain Reaction amplification (PCR), emulsion PCR amplification, or like techniques, to produce an amplicon without the need of a solid support.


In various exemplary embodiments, the methods, systems, and computer readable media described herein may advantageously be used to process and/or analyze data and signals obtained from electronic or charged-based nucleic acid sequencing. In electronic or charged-based sequencing (such as, pH-based sequencing), a nucleotide incorporation event may be determined by detecting ions (e.g., hydrogen ions) that are generated as natural by-products of polymerase-catalyzed nucleotide extension reactions. This may be used to sequence a sample or template nucleic acid, which may be a fragment of a nucleic acid sequence of interest, for example, and which may be directly or indirectly attached as a clonal population to a solid support, such as a particle, microparticle, bead, etc. The sample or template nucleic acid may be operably associated to a primer and polymerase and may be subjected to repeated cycles or “flows” of deoxynucleoside triphosphate (“dNTP”) addition (which may be referred to herein as “nucleotide flows” from which nucleotide incorporations may result) and washing. The primer may be annealed to the sample or template so that the primer's 3′ end can be extended by a polymerase whenever dNTPs complementary to the next base in the template are added. Then, based on the known sequence of nucleotide flows and on measured output signals from the chemical sensors indicative of ion concentration during each nucleotide flow, the identity of the type, sequence and number of nucleotide(s) associated with a sample nucleic acid present in a reaction region coupled to a group of chemical sensors can be determined.



FIGS. 6 to 10 illustrate stages in a manufacturing process for forming a device including multiple chemical sensors coupled to the same reaction region according to a first embodiment.



FIG. 6 illustrates a structure 600 formed in a first stage. The structure 600 includes partially completed floating gate structures for the field effect transistors of the chemical sensors. For example, the structure 600 includes partially completed floating gate structure 618 for the chemically-sensitive field effect transistor 341.1 of the chemical sensor 331.1.


The structure 600 can be formed by depositing a layer of gate dielectric material on the semiconductor substrate 554, and depositing a layer of polysilicon (or other electrically conductive material) on the layer of gate dielectric material. The layer of polysilicon and the layer gate dielectric material can then be etched using an etch mask to form the gate dielectric elements (e.g. gate dielectric 552) and the lowermost conductive material element (e.g. conductive element 551) of the floating gate structures. Following formation of an ion-implantation mask, ion implantation can then be performed to form the source and drain regions (e.g. source region 52 land a drain region 522) of the chemical sensors.


A first layer of the dielectric material 519 can then be deposited over the lowermost conductive material elements. Conductive plugs can then be formed within vias etched in the first layer of dielectric material 519 to contact the lowermost conductive material elements of the floating gate structures. A layer of conductive material can then be deposited on the first layer of the dielectric material 519 and patterned to form second conductive material elements electrically connected to the conductive plugs. This process can then be repeated multiple times to form the partially completed floating gate structures shown in FIG. 6. Alternatively, other and/or additional techniques may be performed to form the structure.


Forming the structure 600 in FIG. 6 can also include forming additional elements such as array lines (e.g. row lines, column lines, etc.) for accessing the chemical sensors, additional doped regions in the substrate 554, and other circuitry (e.g. select switches, access circuitry, bias circuitry etc.) used to operate the chemical sensors, depending upon the device and array configuration in which the chemical sensors are implemented.


Next, conductive material 700 is formed on the structure illustrated in FIG. 6 to contact the partially completed floating gate structures. An etch mask including mask elements 720, 722 is then formed on the conductive material 700, resulting in the structure illustrated in FIG. 7.


The conductive material 700 includes one or more layers of electrically conductive material. For example, the conductive material 700 may include a layer of titanium nitride formed on a layer of aluminum, or a layer of titanium nitride formed on a layer of copper. Alternatively, the number of layers may be different than two, and other and/or additional conductive materials may be used. Examples of conductive materials that can be used in some embodiments include tantalum, aluminum, lanthanum, titanium, zirconium, hafnium, tungsten, palladium, iridium, etc., and combinations thereof.


The locations of the mask elements 720, 722 define the locations of the sensor plates for the chemically-sensitive field effect transistors of the corresponding groups of chemical sensors. In the illustrated embodiment, the mask elements 720, 722 comprise photoresist material which has been patterned using a lithographic process. Alternatively, other techniques and materials may be used.


Next, the conductive material 700 is etched using the mask elements 700, 722 as a mask, resulting in the structure illustrated in FIG. 8. The etching process forms conductive elements 520, 810 in electrical contact with the partially completed floating gate structures of a corresponding group of sensors. The conductive element 520 electrically connects the partially completed floating gate structures for a group of sensors 331.1-331.4, to complete the common floating gate 370 for this group of sensors. Similarly, the conductive material element 810 completes the common floating gate for the adjacent group of sensors.


Next, the mask elements 700, 722 are removed and dielectric material 510 is formed, resulting in the structure illustrated in FIG. 9. The dielectric material 510 may comprise one or more layers of deposited dielectric material, such as silicon dioxide or silicon nitride.


Next, the dielectric material 510 is etched to form openings defining reaction regions 380, 382 extending to upper surfaces of the conductive material elements 520, 810, resulting in the structure illustrated in FIG. 10.



FIG. 11 illustrates a cross-sectional view of portions of two groups of chemical sensors and their corresponding reaction regions according to a second embodiment. In contrast to the embodiment shown in FIG. 5, the common floating gate for each group of chemical sensors includes a sensor plate that is smaller than the bottom surface of the corresponding reaction region.


In FIG. 11, the floating gate structure 1118 for the group of chemical sensors 331.1-331.4 includes conductive element 1120 coupled to the reaction region 380. The conductive element 1120 is coupled to the conductive element 520 by conductive plug 1130. The conductive element 1120 is the uppermost floating gate conductor in the floating gate structure 1118, and thus acts as the sensor plate for the group of chemical sensors 331.1-331.4.


In FIG. 11, an upper surface 1122 of the conductive element 1120 is a portion of the bottom surface of the reaction region 380. That is, there is no intervening deposited material layer between the upper surface 1122 of the conductive element 1120 and the reaction region 380. As a result of this structure, the upper surface 1122 of the conductive element 1120 acts as the sensing surface for the group of chemical sensors 331.1-331.4. In the illustrated embodiment, the conductive element 1120 is within the dielectric material 1160, such that the upper surface 1122 of the conductive element 1120 is co-planar with the upper surface of the dielectric material 1160. Alternatively, the conductive element 1120 may be formed on the upper surface of dielectric material 1160, and thus protrude slightly into the reaction region 380.


As shown in FIG. 11, the upper surface 1122 of the conductive element 1120 has a width 1125 that is the less than the width of the bottom surface of the reaction region 380. As described in more detail below, having a small conductive element 1120 as the sensor plate can enable the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the individual output signals of the chemical sensors 331.1-331.4 to be maximized.


The amplitude of the desired signal detected by the chemical sensors 331.1-331.4 in response to the charge 524 in an analyte solution is a superposition of the charge concentration along the interface between the conductive element 1120 and the analyte solution. Because the charge 524 is more highly concentrated at the bottom and middle of the reaction region 380, the width 1125 of the conductive element 1120 is a tradeoff between the amplitude of the desired signal detected in response to the charge 524, and the fluidic noise due to random fluctuation between the conductive element 1120 and the analyte solution. Increasing the width 1125 of the conductive element 1120 increases the fluidic interface area for the chemical sensors 331.1-331.4, which reduces fluidic noise. However, since the localized surface density of charge 524 decreases with distance from the middle of the reaction region 380, the conductive element 1120 detects a greater proportion of the signal from areas having lower charge concentration, which can reduce the overall amplitude of the detected signal. In contrast, decreasing the width 1122 of the conductive element 1120 reduces the sensing surface area and thus increases the fluidic noise, but also increases the overall amplitude of the detected signal.


For a very small sensing surface area, Applicants have found that the fluidic noise changes as a function of the sensing surface area differently than the amplitude of the desired signal. Because the SNR of an individual output signal is the ratio of these two quantities, there is an optimal width 1125 at which the SNR of the individual output signals from the chemical sensors 331.1-331.2 is maximum.


The optimal width 1125 can vary from embodiment to embodiment depending on the material characteristics of the conductive element 1120 and the dielectric materials 510, 1160, the volume, shape, aspect ratio (such as base width-to-well depth ratio), and other dimensional characteristics of the reaction regions, the nature of the reaction taking place, as well as the reagents, byproducts, or labeling techniques (if any) that are employed. The optimal width may for example be determined empirically.



FIGS. 12 to 14 illustrate stages in a manufacturing process for forming a device including multiple chemical sensors coupled to the same reaction region according to a second embodiment.



FIG. 12 illustrates a first stage of forming conductive plugs 1210, 1220 extending through dielectric material 1200 to contact the conductive elements 520, 810 of the structure illustrated in FIG. 8. The structure in FIG. 12 can be formed by removing the mask elements 720, 722 in FIG. 8 and forming dielectric material 1200 on the resulting structure. Vias can then be etched through the dielectric material 1200, and metal deposited within the vias. A planarization process (e.g. chemical mechanical polishing) can then be performed to remove the deposited metal from the upper surface of the dielectric material 1200 and form the plugs 1210, 1220. Alternatively, other techniques may be used.


Next, conductive material 1300 is formed on the structure illustrated in FIG. 12. An etch mask including mask elements 1320, 1322 is then formed on the conductive material 1300, resulting in the structure illustrated in FIG. 13.


The conductive material 1300 may comprise one or more layers of conductive material, such as those described above with respect the conductive material 700 of FIG. 7. The locations of the mask elements 1320, 1322 define the locations of the sensor plates of the field effect transistors of the corresponding groups of chemical sensors. In the illustrated embodiment, the mask elements 1320, 1322 comprise photoresist material which has been patterned using a lithographic process. Alternatively, other techniques and materials may be used.


Next, the conductive material 1300 is etched using the mask elements 1320, 1322 as a mask to form the conductive elements 1120, 1400. Dielectric material 1160 is then formed between the conductive elements 1120, 1400, resulting in the structure illustrated in FIG. 14.


Next, dielectric material 510 is formed on the structure illustrated in FIG. 14. The dielectric material 510 is then be etched to form openings defining reaction regions 380, 382 extending to upper surfaces of the conductive elements 1120, 1400, resulting in the structure illustrated in FIG. 11. The dielectric material 1160 may comprise material different than that of dielectric material 510. For example, the dielectric material 510 may comprise material (e.g. silicon oxide) which can be selectively etched relative to the material (e.g. silicon nitride) of the dielectric material 1160 when subjected to a chosen etch process. In such a case, the dielectric material 1160 can act as an etch stop during the etching process used to form the reaction regions 380, 382. In doing so, the dielectric material 1160 can prevent etching past the conductive elements 1120, 1400, and thus can define and maintain the desired shape of the reaction regions 380, 382.



FIGS. 15 to 18 illustrate stages in a manufacturing process for forming a device including multiple chemical sensors coupled to the same reaction region according to a third embodiment.



FIG. 15 illustrates a first stage of forming dielectric material 1160 on the structure illustrated in FIG. 12. An etch mask including mask elements 1510, 1520, 1530 is then formed on the dielectric material 1160, resulting in the structure illustrated in FIG. 15. As described in more detail below, openings between the mask elements 1510, 1520, 1530 define the locations of the sensor plates of the field effect transistors of the corresponding groups of chemical sensors.


Next, the dielectric material 1160 is etched using the mask elements 1510, 1520, 1530 as an etch mask to form openings 1610, 1620 within the dielectric material 1160, resulting in the structure illustrated in FIG. 16. As shown in FIG. 16, the openings extend to the upper surfaces of the conductive plugs 1210, 1220.


Next, the mask elements 1510, 1520, 1530 are removed and conductive material 1800 is deposited on the structure illustrated in FIG. 16, resulting in the structure illustrated in FIG. 17. The conductive material 1800 may comprise one or more layers of conductive material, such as those described above with respect the conductive material 700 of FIG. 7.


Next, a planarization process (e.g. CMP) is performed to remove the conductive material 1800 from the upper surface of the dielectric material 1160, resulting in the structure illustrated in FIG. 18. The planarization process leaves remaining conductive material within the openings 1610, 1620 to form the conductive elements 1120, 1400.


Next, dielectric material 510 is formed on the structure illustrated in FIG. 18. The dielectric material 510 can then be etched to form openings defining reaction regions 380, 382 extending to upper surfaces of the conductive elements 1120, 1400, resulting in the structure illustrated in FIG. 11.



FIGS. 19 to 21 illustrate stages in a manufacturing process for forming a device including multiple chemical sensors coupled to the same reaction region according to a fourth embodiment.



FIG. 19 illustrates a first stage of forming conductive plugs 1210, 1220 extending through dielectric material 1900 to contact the conductive elements 520, 810 of the structure illustrated in FIG. 8. As described in more detail below, the dielectric material 1900, comprising one or more layers of dielectric material, acts an etch stop during the subsequent formation of the reaction regions 380, 382. The structure in FIG. 19 can be formed by removing the mask elements 720, 722 illustrated in FIG. 8 and forming the dielectric material 1900 on the resulting structure. The plugs 1210, 1220 can then be formed using the techniques described above with reference to FIG. 12. Alternatively, other techniques may be used.


Next, conductive elements 1120, 1400 are formed on the upper surface of the dielectric material 1900, resulting in the structure illustrated in FIG. 20. The conductive elements 1120, 1400 may be formed by depositing conductive material, forming an etch mask including mask elements defining the locations of the conductive elements 1120, 1400, and etching the conductive material using the mask elements as an etch mask.


Next, dielectric material 510 is formed on the structure illustrated in FIG. 20. The dielectric material 510 is then be etched to form openings defining reaction regions 380, 382 extending to upper surfaces of the conductive elements 1120, 1400, resulting in the structure illustrated in FIG. 21. As shown in FIG. 21, in this embodiment the reaction regions 380, 382 extend below the upper surfaces of the conductive elements 1120, 1400 to expose their side surfaces.


The dielectric material 1900 may comprise material different than that of dielectric material 510. For example, the dielectric material 510 may comprise material (e.g. silicon oxide) which can be selectively etched relative to the material (e.g. silicon nitride) of the dielectric material 1900 when subjected to a chosen etch process. In such a case, the dielectric material 1900 can act as an etch stop during the etching process used to form the reaction regions 380, 382. In doing so, the dielectric material 1900 can prevent etching below the conductive elements 1120, 1400, and thus can define and maintain the shape of the reaction regions 380, 382.


Various embodiments may be implemented using hardware elements, software elements, or a combination of both. Examples of hardware elements may include processors, microprocessors, circuits, circuit elements (e.g., transistors, resistors, capacitors, inductors, and so forth), integrated circuits, application specific integrated circuits (ASIC), programmable logic devices (PLD), digital signal processors (DSP), field programmable gate array (FPGA), logic gates, registers, semiconductor device, chips, microchips, chip sets, and so forth. Examples of software may include software components, programs, applications, computer programs, application programs, system programs, machine programs, operating system software, middleware, firmware, software modules, routines, subroutines, functions, methods, procedures, software interfaces, application program interfaces (API), instruction sets, computing code, computer code, code segments, computer code segments, words, values, symbols, or any combination thereof. Determining whether an embodiment is implemented using hardware elements and/or software elements may vary in accordance with any number of factors, such as desired computational rate, power levels, heat tolerances, processing cycle budget, input data rates, output data rates, memory resources, data bus speeds and other design or performance constraints.


Some embodiments may be implemented, for example, using a computer-readable medium or article which may store an instruction or a set of instructions that, if executed by a machine, may cause the machine to perform a method and/or operations in accordance with the embodiments. Such a machine may include, for example, any suitable processing platform, computing platform, computing device, processing device, computing system, processing system, computer, processor, or the like, and may be implemented using any suitable combination of hardware and/or software. The computer-readable medium or article may include, for example, any suitable type of memory unit, memory device, memory article, memory medium, storage device, storage article, storage medium and/or storage unit, for example, memory, removable or non-removable media, erasable or non-erasable media, writeable or re-writeable media, digital or analog media, hard disk, floppy disk, read-only memory compact disc (CD-ROM), recordable compact disc (CD-R), rewriteable compact disc (CD-RW), optical disk, magnetic media, magneto-optical media, removable memory cards or disks, various types of Digital Versatile Disc (DVD), a tape, a cassette, or the like. The instructions may include any suitable type of code, such as source code, compiled code, interpreted code, executable code, static code, dynamic code, encrypted code, and the like, implemented using any suitable high-level, low-level, object-oriented, visual, compiled and/or interpreted programming language.


While the present invention is disclosed by reference to the preferred embodiments and examples detailed above, it is to be understood that these examples are intended in an illustrative rather than in a limiting sense. It is contemplated that modifications and combinations will readily occur to those skilled in the art, which modifications and combinations will be within the spirit of the invention and the scope of the following claims.

Claims
  • 1. An apparatus, comprising: a chemically-sensitive field effect transistor (chemFET) sensor device comprising: an array of reaction regions;at least two chemFET sensors coupled to each reaction region of the array of reaction regions, wherein each chemFET sensor of the at least two chemFET sensors comprises a chemFET and a row select transistor; anda floating gate common to the at least two chemFET sensors and in communication with each respective reaction region;a row select circuit for biasing each row select transistor of each chemFET sensor of the at least two chemFET sensors for each reaction region in the array of reaction regions;a column output circuit for coupling each chemFET of the at the least two chemFET sensors for each reaction region in the array of reaction regions to a respective column line in response to biasing each respective row select transistor; andan array controller comprising memory for storage of data and software applications, and a processor for accessing data and executing applications.
  • 2. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the array controller is configured to: acquire an individual output signal from each chemFET sensor of the at least two chemFET sensors for each reaction region in the array of reaction regions; andcalculate a resultant output signal for each at least two chemFET sensors for each reaction region in the array of reaction regions based on one or more of the individual output signals.
  • 3. The apparatus of claim 1, further comprising a fluidics system including: a valve block for controllable fluid communication between a plurality of reagents and a flow cell housing the chemFET sensor device; anda reference electrode placed in fluid communication with the chemFET sensor device.
  • 4. The apparatus of claim 3, wherein the array controller provides a reference bias voltage to the reference electrode.
  • 5. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the chemFET sensor device is an ion-sensitive field effect transistor (ISFET) sensor device.
  • 6. The apparatus of claim 5, wherein the ISFET sensor device is sensitive to hydrogen.
  • 7. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein an upper surface of a conductive element of each floating gate common to the at least two chemFET sensors for each reaction region of the array of reaction regions comprises a sensing surface including one or more conductive elements.
  • 8. The apparatus of claim 7, wherein the conductive element of each floating gate comprises a metal or a ceramic.
  • 9. The apparatus of claim 8, wherein the metal comprises at least one of aluminum, copper, nickel, titanium, silver, gold, platinum, hafnium, lanthanum, tantalum, tungsten, iridium, zirconium, or palladium.
  • 10. The apparatus of claim 8, wherein the ceramic comprises at least one of titanium nitride, titanium aluminum nitride, titanium oxide, or tantalum nitride.
  • 11. The apparatus of claim 7, wherein the conductive element of the sensing surface comprises titanium nitride, titanium oxide, or titanium oxynitride.
  • 12. The apparatus of claim 7, wherein the sensing surface is sensitive to ions.
  • 13. The apparatus of claim 12, wherein the sensing surface is sensitive to hydrogen.
  • 14. A method for sequencing comprising: sequentially flowing a series of deoxynucleoside triphosphate (dNTP) solutions over an array of reaction regions, each reaction region coupled to at least two chemFET sensors having a common floating gate in communication with a respective reaction region;coupling column output circuitry to each chemFET of each respective at least two chemFET sensors of each reaction region of the array of reaction regions in response to biasing each respective row select transistor coupled to each chemFET of each respective at least two chemFET sensors;acquiring an individual output signal for each chemFET of the at least two chemFET sensors for each reaction region in the array of reaction regions in response to release of an analyte resulting from incorporation of a nucleotide to a template nucleic acid in a reaction region of the array of reaction regions; andcalculating a resultant output signal for each at least two chemFET sensors for each reaction region in the array of reaction regions based on one or more of the individual output signals.
  • 15. The method of claim 14, wherein the method further comprises: determining a sequence corresponding for each reaction region in the array of reaction regions loaded with a template nucleic acid-containing bead based on the resultant output signal for each at least two chemFET sensors for each reaction region in the array of reaction regions.
  • 16. The method of claim 14, wherein an upper surface of each floating gate common to the at least two chemFET sensors for each reaction region of the array of reaction regions comprises a sensing surface including one or more conductive elements.
  • 17. The method of claim 16, wherein the sensing surface is sensitive to ions.
  • 18. The method of claim 17, wherein the sensing surface is sensitive to hydrogen.
  • 19. The method of claim 14, wherein the at least two chemFET sensors for each reaction region in the array of reaction regions are ion-sensitive field effect (ISFET) sensors.
  • 20. The apparatus of claim 7, wherein the sensing surface is additionally formed on a sidewall of each corresponding reaction region of the array of reaction regions.
RELATED APPLICATION

This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 17/070,142, filed Oct. 14, 2020. U.S. application Ser. No. 17/070,142 is divisional of U.S. application Ser. No. 16/663,052, filed Oct. 24, 2019; which is issued as U.S. Pat. No. 10,816,504 on Oct. 27, 2020. U.S. Pat. No. 10,816,504 is a divisional of U.S. application Ser. No. 14/293,247 filed Jun. 2, 2014; which issued as U.S. Pat. No. 10,458,942 on Oct. 29, 2019. U.S. Pat. No. 10,458,942 claims benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/833,375 filed Jun. 10, 2013. The entire contents of the aforementioned applications are incorporated by reference herein, each in its entirety.

US Referenced Citations (552)
Number Name Date Kind
4086642 Yoshida et al. Apr 1978 A
4411741 Janata Oct 1983 A
4437969 Covington et al. Mar 1984 A
4438354 Haque et al. Mar 1984 A
4444644 Hiramoto et al. Apr 1984 A
4490678 Kuisl et al. Dec 1984 A
4641084 Komatsu Feb 1987 A
4660063 Anthony Apr 1987 A
4691167 V'd et al. Sep 1987 A
4701253 Ligtenberg et al. Oct 1987 A
4722830 Urie et al. Feb 1988 A
4743954 Brown May 1988 A
4764797 Shaw et al. Aug 1988 A
4777019 Dandekar Oct 1988 A
4822566 Newman Apr 1989 A
4863849 Melamede Sep 1989 A
4864229 Lauks et al. Sep 1989 A
4874499 Smith et al. Oct 1989 A
4893088 Myers et al. Jan 1990 A
4927736 Mueller et al. May 1990 A
4971903 Hyman Nov 1990 A
5009766 Lauks Apr 1991 A
5038192 Bonneau et al. Aug 1991 A
5110441 Kinlen et al. May 1992 A
5113870 Rossenfeld May 1992 A
5126759 Small et al. Jun 1992 A
5138251 Koshiishi et al. Aug 1992 A
5140393 Hijikihigawa et al. Aug 1992 A
5142236 Maloberti et al. Aug 1992 A
5151587 Machida et al. Sep 1992 A
5151759 Vinal Sep 1992 A
5164319 Hafeman et al. Nov 1992 A
5202576 Liu et al. Apr 1993 A
5284566 Cuomo et al. Feb 1994 A
5317407 Michon May 1994 A
5319226 Sohn et al. Jun 1994 A
5407854 Baxter et al. Apr 1995 A
5436149 Barnes Jul 1995 A
5439839 Jang Aug 1995 A
5466348 Holm-Kennedy Nov 1995 A
5475337 Tatsumi Dec 1995 A
5490971 Gifford et al. Feb 1996 A
5554339 Cozzette et al. Sep 1996 A
5583462 Grasshoff Dec 1996 A
5587894 Naruo Dec 1996 A
5593838 Zanzucchi et al. Jan 1997 A
5600451 Maki Feb 1997 A
5627403 Bacchetta et al. May 1997 A
5631704 Dickinson et al. May 1997 A
5637469 Wilding et al. Jun 1997 A
5646558 Jamshidi Jul 1997 A
5702964 Lee Dec 1997 A
5793230 Chu et al. Aug 1998 A
5846708 Hollis et al. Dec 1998 A
5894284 Garrity et al. Apr 1999 A
5907765 Lescouzeres et al. May 1999 A
5911873 McCarron et al. Jun 1999 A
5912560 Pasternak Jun 1999 A
5922591 Anderson et al. Jul 1999 A
5923421 Rajic et al. Jul 1999 A
5944970 Rosenblatt Aug 1999 A
5958703 Dower et al. Sep 1999 A
5965452 Kovacs Oct 1999 A
6002299 Thomsen Dec 1999 A
6021172 Fossum et al. Feb 2000 A
6107032 Kilger et al. Aug 2000 A
6191444 Clampitt et al. Feb 2001 B1
6195585 Karunasiri et al. Feb 2001 B1
6210891 Nyren et al. Apr 2001 B1
6255678 Sawada et al. Jul 2001 B1
6262568 Komatsu et al. Jul 2001 B1
6274320 Rothberg et al. Aug 2001 B1
6275061 Tomita Aug 2001 B1
6280586 Wolf et al. Aug 2001 B1
6294133 Sawada et al. Sep 2001 B1
6327410 Walt et al. Dec 2001 B1
6353324 Uber, III et al. Mar 2002 B1
6355431 Chee et al. Mar 2002 B1
6361671 Mathies et al. Mar 2002 B1
6372291 Hua et al. Apr 2002 B1
6376256 Dunnington et al. Apr 2002 B1
6384684 Redman-White May 2002 B1
6403957 Fodor et al. Jun 2002 B1
6406848 Bridgham et al. Jun 2002 B1
6413792 Sauer et al. Jul 2002 B1
6429027 Chee et al. Aug 2002 B1
6432360 Church Aug 2002 B1
6433386 Yun et al. Aug 2002 B1
6459398 Gureshnik et al. Oct 2002 B1
6465178 Chappa et al. Oct 2002 B2
6475728 Martin et al. Nov 2002 B1
6482639 Snow et al. Nov 2002 B2
6485944 Church et al. Nov 2002 B1
6490220 Merritt et al. Dec 2002 B1
6499499 Dantsker et al. Dec 2002 B2
6511803 Church et al. Jan 2003 B1
6518024 Choong et al. Feb 2003 B2
6518146 Singh et al. Feb 2003 B1
6535824 Mansky et al. Mar 2003 B1
6537881 Rangarajan et al. Mar 2003 B1
6538593 Yang et al. Mar 2003 B2
6545620 Groeneweg Apr 2003 B2
6571189 Jensen et al. May 2003 B2
6602702 McDevitt et al. Aug 2003 B1
6605428 Kilger et al. Aug 2003 B2
6613513 Parce et al. Sep 2003 B1
6618083 Chen et al. Sep 2003 B1
6624637 Pechstein Sep 2003 B1
6627154 Goodman et al. Sep 2003 B1
6654505 Bridgham et al. Nov 2003 B2
6657269 Migliorato et al. Dec 2003 B2
6671341 Kinget et al. Dec 2003 B1
6682899 Bryan et al. Jan 2004 B2
6682936 Kovacs Jan 2004 B2
6686638 Fischer et al. Feb 2004 B2
6700814 Nahas et al. Mar 2004 B1
6703660 Yitzchaik et al. Mar 2004 B2
6716629 Hess et al. Apr 2004 B2
6762022 Makarov et al. Jul 2004 B2
6770472 Manalis et al. Aug 2004 B2
6780591 Williams et al. Aug 2004 B2
6795006 Delight et al. Sep 2004 B1
6806052 Bridgham et al. Oct 2004 B2
6828100 Ronaghi Dec 2004 B1
6831994 Bridgham et al. Dec 2004 B2
6841128 Kambara et al. Jan 2005 B2
6859570 Walt et al. Feb 2005 B2
6878255 Wang et al. Apr 2005 B1
6888194 Yoshino May 2005 B2
6898121 Chien May 2005 B2
6906524 Chung et al. Jun 2005 B2
6919211 Fodor et al. Jul 2005 B1
6926865 Howard Aug 2005 B2
6927045 Hadd et al. Aug 2005 B2
6929944 Matson Aug 2005 B2
6939451 Zhao et al. Sep 2005 B2
6953958 Baxter et al. Oct 2005 B2
6958216 Kelley et al. Oct 2005 B2
6969488 Bridgham et al. Nov 2005 B2
6998274 Chee et al. Feb 2006 B2
7008550 Li et al. Mar 2006 B2
7019305 Eversmann et al. Mar 2006 B2
7022288 Boss Apr 2006 B1
7033754 Chee et al. Apr 2006 B2
7037687 Williams et al. May 2006 B2
7045097 Kovacs May 2006 B2
7049645 Sawada et al. May 2006 B2
7060431 Chee et al. Jun 2006 B2
7067886 Bonges, III et al. Jun 2006 B2
7084641 Brederlow et al. Aug 2006 B2
7085502 Shushakov et al. Aug 2006 B2
7087387 Gerdes et al. Aug 2006 B2
7090975 Shultz et al. Aug 2006 B2
7091059 Rhodes Aug 2006 B2
7092757 Larson et al. Aug 2006 B2
7097973 Zenhausern Aug 2006 B1
7105300 Parce et al. Sep 2006 B2
7106089 Nakano et al. Sep 2006 B2
7129554 Lieber et al. Oct 2006 B2
7169560 Lapidus et al. Jan 2007 B2
7173445 Fujii et al. Feb 2007 B2
7190026 Lotfi et al. Mar 2007 B2
7192745 Jaeger Mar 2007 B2
7193453 Wei et al. Mar 2007 B2
7211390 Rothberg et al. May 2007 B2
7220550 Keen May 2007 B2
7223540 Pourmand et al. May 2007 B2
7226734 Chee et al. Jun 2007 B2
7229799 Williams Jun 2007 B2
7235389 Lim et al. Jun 2007 B2
7238323 Knapp et al. Jul 2007 B2
7239188 Xu et al. Jul 2007 B1
7244559 Rothberg et al. Jul 2007 B2
7244567 Chen et al. Jul 2007 B2
7264929 Rothberg et al. Sep 2007 B2
7264934 Fuller Sep 2007 B2
7265929 Umeda et al. Sep 2007 B2
7267751 Gelbart et al. Sep 2007 B2
7276749 Martin et al. Oct 2007 B2
7279588 Hong et al. Oct 2007 B2
7282370 Bridgham et al. Oct 2007 B2
7285384 Fan et al. Oct 2007 B2
7291496 Holm-Kennedy Nov 2007 B2
7297518 Quake et al. Nov 2007 B2
7298475 Gandhi et al. Nov 2007 B2
7303875 Bock et al. Dec 2007 B1
7317216 Holm-Kennedy Jan 2008 B2
7317484 Dosluoglu et al. Jan 2008 B2
7323305 Leamon et al. Jan 2008 B2
7335526 Peters et al. Feb 2008 B2
7335762 Rothberg et al. Feb 2008 B2
7359058 Kranz et al. Apr 2008 B2
7361946 Johnson et al. Apr 2008 B2
7363717 Ekseth et al. Apr 2008 B2
7381936 Tan et al. Jun 2008 B2
7394263 Pechstein et al. Jul 2008 B2
7419636 Aker et al. Sep 2008 B2
7425431 Church et al. Sep 2008 B2
7455971 Chee et al. Nov 2008 B2
7462452 Williams et al. Dec 2008 B2
7462512 Levon et al. Dec 2008 B2
7462709 Jaeger Dec 2008 B2
7465512 Wright et al. Dec 2008 B2
7466258 Akopyan et al. Dec 2008 B1
7470352 Eversmann et al. Dec 2008 B2
7476504 Turner Jan 2009 B2
7482153 Okada et al. Jan 2009 B2
7482677 Lee et al. Jan 2009 B2
7499513 Tetzlaff et al. Mar 2009 B1
7515124 Yaguma et al. Apr 2009 B2
7534097 Wong et al. May 2009 B2
7538827 Chou May 2009 B2
7575865 Leamon et al. Aug 2009 B2
7576037 Engelhardt et al. Aug 2009 B2
7590211 Burney Sep 2009 B1
7595883 El Gamal et al. Sep 2009 B1
7605650 Forbes Oct 2009 B2
7608810 Yamada Oct 2009 B2
7609093 Sarig et al. Oct 2009 B2
7609303 Lee et al. Oct 2009 B1
7612369 Stasiak Nov 2009 B2
7612817 Tay Nov 2009 B2
7614135 Santini, Jr. et al. Nov 2009 B2
7622294 Walt et al. Nov 2009 B2
7645596 Williams et al. Jan 2010 B2
7649358 Toumazou et al. Jan 2010 B2
7667501 Surendranath et al. Feb 2010 B2
7686929 Toumazou et al. Mar 2010 B2
7695907 Miyahara et al. Apr 2010 B2
7733401 Takeda Jun 2010 B2
7772383 Chakrabarti et al. Aug 2010 B2
7785785 Pourmand et al. Aug 2010 B2
7785790 Church et al. Aug 2010 B1
7794584 Chodavarapu et al. Sep 2010 B2
7821806 Horiuchi Oct 2010 B2
7824900 Iwadate et al. Nov 2010 B2
7838226 Kamahori et al. Nov 2010 B2
7842377 Lanphere et al. Nov 2010 B2
7842457 Berka et al. Nov 2010 B2
7859029 Lee et al. Dec 2010 B2
7859291 Kim Dec 2010 B2
7875440 Williams et al. Jan 2011 B2
7884398 Levon et al. Feb 2011 B2
7885490 Heideman et al. Feb 2011 B2
7888013 Miyahara et al. Feb 2011 B2
7888015 Toumazou et al. Feb 2011 B2
7888708 Yazawa et al. Feb 2011 B2
7890891 Stuber et al. Feb 2011 B2
7898277 Weir Mar 2011 B2
7923240 Su Apr 2011 B2
7927797 Nobile et al. Apr 2011 B2
7932034 Esfandyarpour et al. Apr 2011 B2
7948015 Rothberg et al. May 2011 B2
7955995 Kakehata et al. Jun 2011 B2
7960776 Kim et al. Jun 2011 B2
7972828 Ward et al. Jul 2011 B2
7981362 Glezer et al. Jul 2011 B2
8012690 Berka et al. Sep 2011 B2
8017938 Gomez et al. Sep 2011 B2
8035175 Shim et al. Oct 2011 B2
8052863 Suzuki et al. Nov 2011 B2
8067731 Matyjaszczyk et al. Nov 2011 B2
8072188 Yorinobu et al. Dec 2011 B2
8114591 Toumazou et al. Feb 2012 B2
8124936 Lagna Feb 2012 B1
8133698 Silver Mar 2012 B2
8138496 Li et al. Mar 2012 B2
8154480 Shishido et al. Apr 2012 B2
8199859 Zerbe et al. Jun 2012 B2
8217433 Fife Jul 2012 B1
8227877 Lee et al. Jul 2012 B2
8231831 Hartzell et al. Jul 2012 B2
8232813 Burdett et al. Jul 2012 B2
8247849 Fife et al. Aug 2012 B2
8248356 Chen Aug 2012 B2
8262900 Rothberg et al. Sep 2012 B2
8263336 Rothberg et al. Sep 2012 B2
8264014 Rothberg et al. Sep 2012 B2
8269261 Rothberg et al. Sep 2012 B2
8277628 Ronaghi et al. Oct 2012 B2
8293082 Rothberg et al. Oct 2012 B2
8306757 Rothberg et al. Nov 2012 B2
8313625 Rothberg et al. Nov 2012 B2
8313639 Rothberg et al. Nov 2012 B2
8317999 Rothberg et al. Nov 2012 B2
8340914 Gatewood et al. Dec 2012 B2
8343856 Therrien et al. Jan 2013 B2
8349167 Rothberg et al. Jan 2013 B2
8357547 Lee et al. Jan 2013 B2
8361713 Bridgham et al. Jan 2013 B2
8383896 Floyd Feb 2013 B2
8415716 Rothberg et al. Apr 2013 B2
8421437 Levine Apr 2013 B2
8426898 Rothberg et al. Apr 2013 B2
8426899 Rothberg et al. Apr 2013 B2
8435395 Rothberg et al. May 2013 B2
8441044 Rothberg et al. May 2013 B2
8445194 Drmanac et al. May 2013 B2
8445945 Rothberg et al. May 2013 B2
8449824 Sun May 2013 B2
8450781 Rothberg et al. May 2013 B2
8470164 Rothberg et al. Jun 2013 B2
8487790 Fife et al. Jul 2013 B2
8492800 Rothberg et al. Jul 2013 B2
8496802 Rothberg et al. Jul 2013 B2
8502278 Rothberg et al. Aug 2013 B2
8519448 Rothberg et al. Aug 2013 B2
8524057 Rothberg et al. Sep 2013 B2
8530941 Rothberg et al. Sep 2013 B2
8535513 Rothberg et al. Sep 2013 B2
8552771 Jordan et al. Oct 2013 B1
8558288 Rothberg et al. Oct 2013 B2
8575664 Rothberg et al. Nov 2013 B2
8592154 Rearick Nov 2013 B2
8653567 Fife Feb 2014 B2
8658017 Rothberg et al. Feb 2014 B2
8673627 Nobile et al. Mar 2014 B2
8685230 Rothberg et al. Apr 2014 B2
8685298 Rockenschaub et al. Apr 2014 B2
8728844 Liu et al. May 2014 B1
8731847 Johnson et al. May 2014 B2
8742469 Milgrew Jun 2014 B2
8742472 Rothberg et al. Jun 2014 B2
8747748 Li et al. Jun 2014 B2
8748947 Milgrew Jun 2014 B2
8764969 Rothberg et al. Jul 2014 B2
8766327 Milgrew Jul 2014 B2
8766328 Rothberg et al. Jul 2014 B2
8776573 Rearick et al. Jul 2014 B2
8786331 Jordan et al. Jul 2014 B2
8796036 Fife et al. Aug 2014 B2
8821798 Bustillo et al. Sep 2014 B2
8823380 Levine et al. Sep 2014 B2
8841217 Fife et al. Sep 2014 B1
8847637 Guyton Sep 2014 B1
8912005 Fife et al. Dec 2014 B1
8945912 Bashir et al. Feb 2015 B2
8962366 Putnam et al. Feb 2015 B2
8963216 Fife et al. Feb 2015 B2
8983783 Johnson et al. Mar 2015 B2
9023674 Shen et al. May 2015 B2
9164070 Fife Oct 2015 B2
9201041 Dalton et al. Dec 2015 B2
9270264 Jordan et al. Feb 2016 B2
9389199 Cheng et al. Jul 2016 B2
9618475 Rothberg et al. Apr 2017 B2
9671363 Fife et al. Jun 2017 B2
20020012933 Rothberg et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020042388 Cooper et al. Apr 2002 A1
20020070791 Dabral Jun 2002 A1
20020081714 Jain et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020085136 Moon et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020150909 Stuelpnagel et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020168678 Williams et al. Nov 2002 A1
20030020334 Nozu Jan 2003 A1
20030044833 Benchikh et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030054396 Weiner Mar 2003 A1
20030064366 Hardin et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030068629 Rothberg et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030108867 Chee et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030119020 Stevens et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030124572 Umek et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030124599 Chen et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030141928 Lee Jul 2003 A1
20030141929 Casper et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030152994 Woudenberg et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030155942 Thewes Aug 2003 A1
20030175990 Hayenga et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030186262 Cailloux Oct 2003 A1
20030211502 Sauer et al. Nov 2003 A1
20030215791 Garini et al. Nov 2003 A1
20030215857 Kilger et al. Nov 2003 A1
20030224419 Corcoran et al. Dec 2003 A1
20030227296 Lee Dec 2003 A1
20040002470 Keith et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040023253 Kunwar et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040079636 Hsia et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040106211 Kauer et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040121354 Yazawa et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040130377 Takeda et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040136866 Pontis et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040146849 Huang et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040185484 Costa et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040185591 Hsiung et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040197803 Yaku et al. Oct 2004 A1
20050006234 Hassibi Jan 2005 A1
20050009022 Weiner et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050031490 Gumbrecht et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050032075 Yaku et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050058990 Guia et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050093645 Watanabe et al. May 2005 A1
20050106587 Klapproth et al. May 2005 A1
20050151181 Beintner et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050156207 Yazawa et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050156584 Feng Jul 2005 A1
20050181440 Chee et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050189960 Tajima Sep 2005 A1
20050191698 Chee et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050202582 Eversmann et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050206548 Muramatsu et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050212016 Brunner et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050221473 Dubin et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050230245 Morgenshtein et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050239132 Klapproth Oct 2005 A1
20050282224 Fouillet et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060000772 Sano et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060024711 Lapidus et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060035400 Wu et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060038601 Giguere et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060057025 Eversmann et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060057604 Chen et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060141474 Miyahara et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060154399 Sauer et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060166203 Tooke Jul 2006 A1
20060182664 Peck et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060197118 Migliorato et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060199193 Koo et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060199493 Hartmann et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060205061 Roukes Sep 2006 A1
20060219558 Hafeman et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060228721 Leamon et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060246497 Huang et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060266946 Defrise et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060269927 Lieber et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060289726 Paulus et al. Dec 2006 A1
20070031291 Piech et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070087401 Neilson et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070092872 Rothberg et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070095663 Chou et al. May 2007 A1
20070096164 Peters et al. May 2007 A1
20070099173 Spira et al. May 2007 A1
20070138132 Barth Jun 2007 A1
20070172865 Hardin et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070212681 Shapiro et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070217963 Elizarov et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070231824 Chee et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070233477 Halowani et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070247170 Barbaro et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070250274 Volkov et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070262363 Tao et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070278488 Hirabayashi et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080003142 Link et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080014589 Link et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080047836 Strand et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080063566 Matsumoto et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080085219 Beebe et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080096216 Quake Apr 2008 A1
20080111161 Sorge et al. May 2008 A1
20080121946 Youn et al. May 2008 A1
20080136933 Dosluoglu et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080164917 Floyd et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080178692 Jung et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080185616 Johnson et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080204048 Stasiak et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080205559 Iida Aug 2008 A1
20080210931 Truong et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080230386 Srinivasan et al. Sep 2008 A1
20090048124 Leamon et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090062132 Borner Mar 2009 A1
20090075383 Buschmann et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090079414 Levon et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090120905 Kohl et al. May 2009 A1
20090121258 Kumar May 2009 A1
20090127689 Ye et al. May 2009 A1
20090149607 Karim et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090156425 Walt et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090170728 Walt et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090194416 Hsiung et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090273386 Korobeynikov et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090299138 Mitsuhashi Dec 2009 A1
20100007326 Nakazato Jan 2010 A1
20100026814 Shimoda Feb 2010 A1
20100039146 Park et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100052765 Makino Mar 2010 A1
20100105373 Kanade Apr 2010 A1
20100133547 Kunze et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100137143 Rothberg Jun 2010 A1
20100176463 Koizumi et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100244106 Parker et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100273166 Garcia Oct 2010 A1
20100301398 Rothberg et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110037121 Lee et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110062972 Je et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110114827 Yamaoka et al. May 2011 A1
20110165557 Ah et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110169056 Wey et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110181253 Isham et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110236263 Sawada et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110262903 Davidson et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110263463 Rothberg et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110275522 Rothberg et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110281737 Rothberg et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110281741 Rothberg et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110287945 Rothberg et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110299337 Parris et al. Dec 2011 A1
20120000274 Fife Jan 2012 A1
20120001056 Fife et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120001236 Fife Jan 2012 A1
20120001237 Fife et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120001615 Levine Jan 2012 A1
20120001616 Fife Jan 2012 A1
20120001646 Bolander et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120013392 Rothberg et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120034607 Rothberg et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120045368 Hinz et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120045844 Rothberg et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120055811 Rothberg et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120055813 Rothberg et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120056248 Fife Mar 2012 A1
20120060587 Babcock et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120129703 Rothberg et al. May 2012 A1
20120129732 Rothberg et al. May 2012 A1
20120135870 Rothberg et al. May 2012 A1
20120143531 Davey et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120154018 Sugiura Jun 2012 A1
20120161207 Homyk et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120173159 Davey et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120249192 Matsushita Oct 2012 A1
20120261274 Rearick et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120286771 Rothberg et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120326213 Bustillo et al. Dec 2012 A1
20120326767 Milgrew Dec 2012 A1
20120329043 Milgrew Dec 2012 A1
20120329192 Bustillo et al. Dec 2012 A1
20130001653 Milgrew et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130009214 Bustillo et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130027594 Krymski Jan 2013 A1
20130056353 Nemirovsky et al. Mar 2013 A1
20130105868 Kalnitsky et al. May 2013 A1
20130135018 Kuo et al. May 2013 A1
20130189790 Li et al. Jul 2013 A1
20130210128 Rothberg et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130210182 Rothberg et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130210641 Rothberg et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130217004 Rothberg et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130217587 Rothberg et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130273664 Toumazou Oct 2013 A1
20130281307 Li et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130324421 Rothberg et al. Dec 2013 A1
20130341734 Merz Dec 2013 A1
20140075237 Ware Mar 2014 A1
20140080717 Li et al. Mar 2014 A1
20140148345 Li et al. May 2014 A1
20140234981 Zarkesh-Ha et al. Aug 2014 A1
20140235463 Rothberg et al. Aug 2014 A1
20140308752 Chang et al. Oct 2014 A1
20140367748 Dalton et al. Dec 2014 A1
20150097214 Chen et al. Apr 2015 A1
20160178568 Cheng et al. Jun 2016 A1
20170038334 Barbee et al. Feb 2017 A1
20170059514 Hoffman Mar 2017 A1
20170102356 Lin et al. Apr 2017 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (47)
Number Date Country
1582334 Feb 2005 CN
101676714 Mar 2010 CN
4232532 Apr 1994 DE
4430811 Sep 1995 DE
102004044299 Mar 2006 DE
102008012899 Sep 2009 DE
1243925 Sep 2002 EP
1371974 Dec 2003 EP
1542009 Jun 2005 EP
1669749 Jun 2006 EP
1870703 Dec 2007 EP
1975246 Oct 2008 EP
S5870155 Apr 1983 JP
S62237349 Oct 1987 JP
H02250331 Oct 1990 JP
H02310931 Dec 1990 JP
H0580115 Apr 1993 JP
H1078827 Mar 1998 JP
2000055874 Feb 2000 JP
2002221510 Aug 2002 JP
2002272463 Sep 2002 JP
2003279532 Oct 2003 JP
2003322633 Nov 2003 JP
2004500033 Jan 2004 JP
2004343441 Dec 2004 JP
2005515475 May 2005 JP
2006138846 Jun 2006 JP
2006284225 Oct 2006 JP
2007512810 May 2007 JP
2008215974 Sep 2008 JP
200946904 Nov 2009 TW
WO-2004040291 May 2004 WO
WO-2004048962 Jun 2004 WO
WO-2005015156 Feb 2005 WO
WO-2005054431 Jun 2005 WO
WO-2005062049 Jul 2005 WO
WO-2005084367 Sep 2005 WO
WO-2005090961 Sep 2005 WO
WO-2006056226 Jun 2006 WO
WO-2007002204 Jan 2007 WO
WO-2008058282 May 2008 WO
WO-2008107014 Sep 2008 WO
WO-2009041917 Apr 2009 WO
WO-2010047804 Apr 2010 WO
WO-2010138186 Dec 2010 WO
WO-2012046137 Apr 2012 WO
WO-2012152308 Nov 2012 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (241)
Entry
Ahmadian A., et al., “Single-Nucleotide Polymorphism Analysis by Pyrosequencing,” Analytical and Biochemistry, 2000, vol. 280, pp. 103-110.
Akiyama et al., “Ion-Sensitive Field-Effect Transistors with Inorganic Gate Oxide for pH Sensing”, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 29, No. 12, 1982, pp. 1936-1941.
Bandettini et al., “Processing Strategies for Time-Course Data Sets in Functional MRI of the Human Brain,” MRM, vol. 30, 1993, pp. 161-172.
Bandiera et al., “A fully electronic sensor for the measurement of cDNA hybridization kinetics”, Biosensors & Bioelectronics, vol. 22, Nos. 9-10, Apr. 15, 2007, pp. 2108-2114.
Barbaro et al., “A Charge-Modulated FET for Detection of Biomolecular Processes: Conception, Modeling, and Simulation”, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 53, No. 1, 2006, pp. 158-166.
Barbaro et al., “A CMOS, Fully Integrated Sensor for Electronic Detection of DNA Hybridization”, IEEE Electronic Device Letters, vol. 27, No. 7, 2006, pp. 595-597.
Barbaro M., et al., “Fully Electronic DNA Hybridization Detection by a Standard CMOS Biochip,” Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, 2006, vol. 118, pp. 41-46.
Bashford et al., “Automated bead-trapping apparatus and control system for singlemolecule DNA sequencing”, Optics Express, vol. 16, No. 5, Mar. 3, 2008, pp. 3445-3455.
Baumann et al., “Microelectronic sensor system for microphysiological application on living cells”, Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, vol. 55, No. 1, Apr. 1999, pp. 77-89.
Bausells et al., “Ion-sensitive field-effect transistors fabricated in a commercial CMOS technology”, Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, vol. 57, Nos. 1-3, 1999, pp. 56-62.
Bergveld, “ISFET, Theory and Practice”, IEEE Sensor Conference, Toronto, Oct. 2003, pp. 1-26.
Bergveld P., “Thirty years of ISFETOLOGY What happened in the past 30 years and what may happen in the next 30 years,” Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, Jan. 2003, vol. 88, No. 1, pp. 1-20.
Besselink et al., “ISFET Affinity Sensor”, Chapter 12 in Methods in Biotechnology, Affinity Biosensors: Techniques and Protocols, vol. 7, 1998, pp. 173-185.
Bobrov et al., “Chemical sensitivity of an ISFET with Ta2O5 membrane in strong acid and alkaline solutions”, Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, vol. 3, No. 1, Jan. 1991, pp. 75-81.
Bockelmann et al., “Detecting DNA by field effect transistor arrays”, Proceedings of the 2006 IFIP International Conference on Very Large Scale Integration, 2006, pp. 164-168.
Bousse et al., “A process for the combined fabrication of ion sensors and CMOS circuits”, IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 9, No. 1, Jan. 1988, pp. 44-46.
Bousse et al., “Zeta potential measurements of Ta2O5 and SiO2 thin films” Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, vol. 147, No. 1, Nov. 1991, pp. 22-32.
Chan et al., “An Integrated ISFETs Instrumentation System in Standard CMOS Technology”, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 45, No. 9, Sep. 2010, pp. 1923-1934.
Chen et al., “Silicon-based nanoelectronic field-effect pH sensor with local gate control”, Applied Physics Letter, vol. 89, Nov. 2006, pp. 223512-1-223512-3.
Chen et al., “Nanoscale field effect transistor for biomolecular signal amplification”, Applied Physics Letter, vol. 91, No. 24, Nov. 2007, pp. 243511-1-243511-3.
Chin et al., “Titanium Nitride Membrane Application to Extended Gate Field Effect Transistor pH Sensor Using VLSI Technology”, Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 40, Part 1, No. 11, Nov. 2001, pp. 6311-6315.
Chou et al., “Simulation of Ta2O5-gate ISFET temperature characteristics”, Sensor and Actuators B: Chemical, vol. 71, Nos. 1-2, Nov. 2000, pp. 73-76.
Chou et al., “Letter to the Editor on Simulation of Ta2O5-gate ISFET temperature characteristics”, Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, vol. 80, 2001, pp. 290-291.
Chung et al., “ISFET interface circuit embedded with noise rejection capability”, Electronics Letters, vol. 40, No. 18, e-pub, 2 Pages, Sep. 2, 2004, pp. 1115-1116.
Chung et al., “ISFET performance enhancement by using the improved circuit techniques”, Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, vol. 113, No. 1, Jan. 2006, pp. 555-562.
Chung et al., “New ISFET interface circuit design with temperature Compensation”, CiteSeerx—URL: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.95.2321&rep=rep1-&type=pdf, 2006, pp. 1.
Chung et al., “New ISFET Interface Circuit Design with Temperature Compensation”, Microelectronics Journal, vol. 37, No. 10, Oct. 1, 2006, pp. 1105-1114.
Chung et al., “Temperature compensation electronics for ISFET readout applications”, Biomedical Circuits and Systems, IEEE International Workshop Singapore, Dec. 1, 2004, pp. 305-308.
Dahl et al., “Circle-to-circle amplification for precise and sensitive DNA analysis,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 101, No. 13, Mar. 2004, pp. 4548-4553.
Dazhong et al., “Research of CMOS Biosensor IC for Extracellular Electrophysiological Signal Recording and pH value Measuring”, Solid-State and Integrated-Circuit Technology, 9th International Conference, NJ USA, Oct. 20, 2008, pp. 2557-2560.
Dorf, “The Electrical Engineering Handbook”, University of California, Davis, CRC Press, 2 edition, Chapter 3—Linear Circuit Analysis, Jun. 25, 2004, pp. 3-1 to 3-66.
Eastman Kodak Company, “Image Sensor Solutions-Full-Frame CCD Image Sensor Performance Specification”, www.physics.csbsju.edu/370/photometry/manuals/kaf-1001e.pdf, Feb. 19, 2001.
Eijkel et al., “Measuring Donnan-related phenomena using a solid-state ion sensor and a concentration-step method”, Journal of Membrane Science, vol. 127, May 1997, pp. 203-221.
Eijkel, “Potentiometric detection and characterization of adsorbed protein using stimulus-response measurement techniques”, Thesis, Sep. 3, 1955, pp. 1-147; pp. 160-192.
Eltoukhy et al., “A 0.18um CMOS 10-6 lux bioluminescence detection system-on-chip”, 2004 IEEE Inti Solid States Conference. Digest of Technical Papers. Session 12, Microsystems/12.3, Feb. 17, 2004. pp. 1-3.
Eltoukhy et al., “A. 0.18-μm CMOS Bioluminescence Detection Lab-on-Chip”, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 41, No. 3, Apr. 2006, pp. 651-662.
EP Extended Search report dated May 27, 2015, to EP Patent Application No. 09822323.3.
EP Extended Search report dated Nov. 7, 2017, to EP Patent Application No. 17167536.5.
EP09798251.6, Extended Search Report, dated Aug. 27, 2013, 6 pages.
EP10780930.3, Search Report, dated Jun. 15, 2015, 3 pages.
EP10780935.2, Partial Search Report, dated Jun. 9, 2015, 5 pages.
EP10780935.2, Supplementary Search Report, dated Sep. 30, 2015.
EP10857377.5, Search Report, dated Jun. 26, 2015, 3 pages.
EP11801437.2, European Search Report, dated Jul. 8, 2014.
EP11801437.2, Extended Search Report, dated Jul. 25, 2013, 10 pages.
EP11801439.8, Extended Search Report, dated Mar. 7, 2014, 9 pages.
EP11804218.3, Extended Search Report, dated Jul. 11, 2013, 3 pages.
EP11827128.7, Search Report, dated Aug. 1, 2013, 5 pages.
EP13161312.7, Extended Search Report, dated Oct. 15, 2013, 8 pages.
EP13163995.7, Extended Search Report, dated Aug. 20, 2013, 6 pages.
EP13164768.7, Extended Search Report, dated Aug. 20, 2013, 6 pages.
EP13174555.6, Extended Search Report, dated Dec. 4, 2013, 8 pages.
EP13174555.6, Search Report, dated Nov. 21, 2013, 5 pages.
EP13177039.8, Search Report, dated Nov. 21, 2013, 9 pages.
EP13177590.0, Search Report, dated Nov. 20, 2013, 5 pages.
EP14152861.2, Search Report, dated Jul. 7, 2014, 5 pages.
EP15170247.9, Search Report, dated Nov. 10, 2015, 4 pages.
Eriksson et al., “Pyrosequencing™ Technology at Elevated Temperature” Electrophoresis, vol. 25, No. 1, Jan. 2004, pp. 20-27.
Esfandyarpour et al., “Gate-controlled microfluidic chamber with magnetic bead for DNA sequencing-by-synthesis technology”, Proc 5th Intl Conf Nanochannels, Microchannels and Minichannels, Puebla, Mexico, Jun. 18-20, 2007, pp. 1-5.
Faramarzpour et al., “CMOS-Based Active Pixel for Low-Light Level Detection: Analysis and Measurements”, IEEE Trans Electron Devices, vol. 54, No. 12, Dec. 2007, pp. 3229-3237.
Finn et al., “Towards an Optimization of FET-Based Bio-Sensors”, European Cells and Materials, vol. 4, Sup 2, 2002, pp. 21-23.
Fraden, “Handbook of Modern Sensors-Physics, Designs, and Applications”, 17.3.2 CHEMFET Sensors, 1996, pp. 499-501.
Fritz et al., “Electronic detection of DNA by its intrinsic molecular charge”, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 99, No. 22, Oct. 29, 2002, pp. 14142-14146.
Gardner et al., “Enhancing electronic nose performance by sensor selection using a new integer-based genetic algorithm approach”, Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, vol. 106, No. 1, Apr. 2005, pp. 114-121.
Gracia et al., “Test Structures for ISFET Chemical Sensors”, IEEE Proceedings of the 1992 International Conference on Microelectronic Test Structures, vol. 5, 1992, pp. 156-159.
Hammond et al., “A System-on-Chip Digital pH Meter for Use in a Wireless Diagnostic Capsule”, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 52, No. 4, May 2005, pp. 687-694.
Hammond et al., “Encapsulation of a liquid-sensing microchip using SU-8 photoresist”, MicroElectronic Engineering, vols. 73-74, Jun. 2004, pp. 893-897.
Hammond et al., “Genomic sequencing and analysis of a Chinese Hamster ovary cell line using Illumina sequencing technology”, BMC Genomics, vol. 12, No. 67, Jan. 2011, pp. 1-8.
HAMMOND P.A., et al., “Design of a Single-Chip pH Sensor Using a Conventional 0.6-μm CMOS Process,” IEEE Sensors Journal, Dec. 2004, vol. 4, No. 6, pp. 706-712.
HAMMOND P.A., et al., “Performance and System-on-Chip Integration of an Unmodified CMOS ISFET,” Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, Nov. 2005, vol. 111-112, pp. 254-258.
HAN “Label-free detection of biomolecules by a field-effect transistor microarray biosensor with bio-functionalized gate surfaces,” Masters Dissertation, RWTH Aachen University, 2006, pp. 1-63.
Hanshaw et al., “An indicator displacement system for fluorescent detection of phosphate oxyanions under physiological conditions”, Tetrahedron Letters, vol. 45, No. 47, Nov. 15, 2004, pp. 8721-8724.
Hara et al., “Dynamic response of a Ta2O5-gate pH-sensitive field-effect transistor”, Sensors Actuators B: Chemical, vol. 32, No. 2, May 1996, pp. 115-119.
Hermon et al., “Miniaturized bio-electronic hybrid for chemical sensing applications”, Tech Connect News, Apr. 22, 2008, pp. 1.
Hideshima et al., “Detection of tumor marker in blood serum using antibody-modified field effect transistor with optimized BSA blocking”, Sensors and Actuations B: Chemical, vol. 161, No. 1, Jan. 2012, pp. 146-150.
Hijikata et al., “Identification of a Single Nucleotide Polymorphism in the MXA Gene Promoter (T/T at nt-88) Correlated with the Response of Hepatitis C Patients to Interferon”, Intervirology, vol. 43, No. 2, 2000, pp. 124-127.
Hizawa et al., “32.times.32 pH Image Sensors for Real Time Observation of Biochemical Phenomena”, Transducers & Eurosensors '07, 14th Intl. Conf, on Solid-State, Actuators and Microsystems, Lyon, France, Jun. 10-14, 2007, pp. 1311-1312.
Hizawa, et al., “Sensing Characteristics of Charge Transfer Type pH Sensor by Accumulative Operation”, IEEE Sensors, EXCO, Daegu, Korea, Oct. 22-25, 2006, pp. 144-147.
Hizawa T., et al., “Fabrication of a Two-dimensional pH Image Sensor Using a Charge Transfer Technique,” Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, Oct. 2006, vol. 117, No. 2, pp. 509-515.
Ingebrandt et al., “Label-free Detection of DNA using Field-Effect Transistors”, Physica status solidi A, vol. 203, No. 14, Nov. 2006, pp. 3399-3411.
Izuru, “Kojien”, published by Owanami, Fourth Edition, 1991, pp. 2683.
Jakobson et al., “Low frequency noise and drift in Ion Sensitive Field Effect Transistors”, Sensors Actuators B: Chemical, vol. 68, Nos. 1-3, Aug. 2000, pp. 134-139.
Ji et al., “A CMOS contact imager for locating individual cells”, IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems, 2006, pp. 3357-3360.
Ji et al., “Contact Imaging: Simulation and Experiment”, IEEE Trans Circuits Systems-I: Regular Papers, vol. 54, No. 8, 2007, pp. 1698-1710.
Kim et al., “An FET-type charger sensor for highly sensitive detection of DNA sequence”, Biosensors & Bioelectronics, vol. 20, No. 1, Jul. 30, 2004, pp. 69-74.
Klein, “Time effects of ion-sensitive field-effect transistors”, Sensors and Actuators, vol. 17, Nos. 1-2, May 1989, pp. 203-208.
Koch et al., “Protein detection with a novel ISFET-based zeta potential analyzer”, Biosensors & Bioelectronics, vol. 14, No. 4, Apr. 1999, pp. 413-421.
Krause et al., “Extended Gate Electrode Arrays for Extracellular Signal Recordings”, Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, vol. 70, Nos. 1-3, Nov. 2000, pp. 101-107.
Kruise et al., “Detection of protein concentrations using a pH-step titration method”, Sensors Actuators B: Chemical, vol. 44, Nos. 1-3, Oct. 1997, pp. 297-303.
Leamon et al., “A Massively Parallel PicoTiterPlate Based Platform for Discrete Picoliter-Scale Polymerase Chain Reactions”, Electrophoresis, vol. 24, No. 21, Nov. 24, 2003, pp. 3769-3777.
Leamon J.H., et al., “Cramming More Sequencing Reactions onto Microreactor Chips,” Chemical Reviews, Aug. 2007, vol. 107, No. 8, pp. 3367-3376.
Lee et al. “An Enhanced Glucose Biosensor Using Charge Transfer Techniques” Biosensors & Bioelectronics, vol. 24, No. 4, Dec. 2008, pp. 650-656.
Lee et al., “Ion-sensitive Field-Effect Transistor for Biological Sensing”, Sensors, vol. 9, No. 9, 2009, pp. 7111-7131.
Li et al., “Sequence-Specific Label-Free DNA Sensors based on Silico Nanowires”, Nano Letters, vol. 4, No. 2, Jan. 2004, pp. 245-247.
Ligler et al., “Array biosensor for detection of toxins”, Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, vol. 377, No. 3, Oct. 2003, pp. 469-477.
Lin et al., “Practicing the Novolacdeep-UV portable conformable masking technique”, Journal of Vacuum Science and Technology, vol. 19, No. 4, 1981, pp. 1313-1319.
Liu et al., “An ISFET based sensing array with sensor offset compensation and pH sensitivity enhancement”, IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems, Jun. 2, 2010, pp. 2283-2286.
Lohrengel et al., “A new microcell or microreactor for material surface investigations at large current densities”, Electrochimica Acta, vol. 49, Nos. 17-18, Jul. 2004, pp. 2863-2870.
Lui et al., “A Test Chip for ISFET/CMNOS Technology Development”, IEEE International Conference on Microelectronic Test Structures, vol. 9, 1996, pp. 123-128.
Maki et al., “Nanowire-transistor based ultra-sensitive DNA methylation detection”, Biosensors & Bioelectronics, vol. 23, No. 6, Jan. 2008, pp. 780-787.
Margulies M., et al., “Genome Sequencing in Microfabricated High-Density Picolitre Reactors,” Nature, 2005, vol. 437, No. 7057, pp. 376-380.
Marshall et al., “DNA chips: an array of possibilities”, Nature Biotechnology, vol. 16, No. 1, Jan. 1998, pp. 27-31.
Martinoia et al., “A behavioral macromodel of the ISFET in SPICE”, Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, vol. 62, No. 3, Mar. 2000, pp. 182-189.
Martinoia S., et al., “Development of ISFET Array-Based Microsystems for Bioelectrochemical Measurements of Cell Populations,” Biosensors & Bioelectronics, Dec. 2001, vol. 16, Nos. 9-12, pp. 1043-1050.
Matsuo et al. “Charge Transfer Type pH Sensor with Super High Sensitivity” 14th International Conference on Solid-State Sensors Actuators and Microsystems, France, Jun. 10-14, 2007, pp. 1881-1884.
Matula, “Electrical Resistivity of Copper, Gold, Palladium, and Silver”, Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data, vol. 8, No. 4, 1979, pp. 1147-1298.
Medoro et al., “A Lab-on-Chip for Cell Detection and Manipulation”, IEEE Sensors Journal, vol. 3, No. 3, 2003, pp. 317-325.
Meyburg et al., “N-Channel field-effect transistors with floating gates for extracellular recordings”, Biosensors and Bioelectronics, vol. 21, No. 7, Jan. 15, 2006, pp. 1037-1044.
Milgrew et al., “A 16x16 CMOS proton camera array for direct extracellular imaging of hydrogen-ion activity”, IEEE Inti Solid-State Circuits Conference, Session 32:24, 2008, pp. 590-591, 638.
Milgrew et al., “A Proton Camera Array Technology for Direct Extracellular Ion Imaging”, IEEE International Symposium on Industrial Electronics, 2008, pp. 2051-2055.
Milgrew et al., “Matching the transconductance characteristics of CMOS ISFET arrays by removing trapped charge”, IEEE Transactions on Electronic Devices, vol. 55, No. 4, 2008, pp. 1074-1079.
Milgrew et al., “Microsensor Array Technology for Direct Extracellular Imaging”, Dept Electronic and EE, University of Glasgow, Apr. 5, 2006, pp. 1-23.
Milgrew et al., “The fabrication of scalable multi-sensor arrays using standard CMOS technology”, IEEE Custom Integrated Circuits Conference, 2003, pp. 513-516.
Milgrew M.J., et al., “A Large Transistor-based Sensor Array Chip for Direct Extracellular Imaging,” Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, 2005, vol. 111-112, pp. 347-353.
Milgrew M.J., et al., “The Development of Scalable Sensor Arrays Using Standard CMOS Technology,” Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, Sep. 2004, vol. 103, Nos. 1-2, pp. 37-42.
Miyahara et al., “Biochip Using Micromachining Technology”, Journal of Institute of Electrostatics, Japan, vol. 27, No. 6, 2003, pp. 268-272.
Miyahara et al., “Direct Transduction of Primer Extension into Electrical Signal Using Genetic Field Effect Transistor”, Micro Total Analysis Systems, vol. 1, Proceedings of UTAS 2004, 8th International Conference on Miniaturized Systems for Chemistry and Life Sciences, Malmo, Sweden, Sep. 26-30, 2004, pp. 303-305.
Miyahara et al., “Potentiometric Detection of DNA Molecules Using Field Effect Transistor”, The Japan Society of Applied Physics, No. 3, 2003, pp. 1180, 30A-S2.
Morgenshtein et al., “Wheatstone-Bridge readout interface for ISFET/REFET applications”, Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, vol. 98, No. 1, Mar. 2004, pp. 18-27.
Moriizumi, “Biosensors”, Oyo Buturi (monthly publication of the Japan Society of Applied Physics), vol. 54, No. 2, Feb. 10, 1985, pp. 98-114.
Naidu et al., “Introduction to Electrical Engineering”, Chapter 1—Fundamental Concepts of Electricity, McGraw Hill Education (India) Private Limited, 1995, pp. 1-10.
Nakazato, “An Integrated ISFET Sensor Array”, Sensors, Nov. 2009, vol. 9, No. 11, ISSN:1424-8220, [online], Internet, URL, http://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/9/11/8831/pdf, Nov. 2009, pp. 8831-8851.
Nakazato et al., “28p-Y-7 ISFET sensor array integrated circuits based on the standard CMOS process”, The 55th annual meeting of the Japan Society of Applied Physics, Book of Abstracts, Mar. 27, 2008, p. 70.
Neaman, “Electronic Circuit Analysis and Design”, McGraw Hill Higher Education, 2nd Edition, Chapter 6—Basic FET Amplifiers, (reference will be uploaded in 2 parts due to size) part 1 of 2, Dec. 1, 2000, pp. 313-345.
Neaman, “Electronic Circuit Analysis and Design”, McGraw Hill Higher Education, 2nd Edition, Chapter 6—Basic FET Amplifiers, (reference will be uploaded in 2 parts due to size) part 2 of 2, Dec. 1, 2000, pp. 346-381.
Nishiguchi et al., “Si nanowire ion-sensitive field-effect transistors with a shared floating gate”, Applied Physics Letters, vol. 94, Apr. 2009, pp. 163106-1 to 163106-3.
Nyren et al., “Enzymatic Method for Continuous Monitoring of Inorganic Pyrophosphate Synthesis”, Analytical Biochemistry, vol. 151, No. 2, Dec. 1985, pp. 504-509.
Oelßner et al., “Encapsulation of ISFET sensor chips”, Sensors Actuators B: Chemical, vol. 105, No. 1, Feb. 2005, pp. 104-117.
Oelßner et al., “Investigation of the dynamic response behavior of ISFET pH sensors by means of laser Doppler velocimetry (LDV)”, Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, vol. 27, Nos. 1-3, Jun. 1995, pp. 345-348.
Offenhausser et al., “Field-Effect transistor array for monitoring electrical activity from mammalian neurons in culture”, Biosensors & Bioelectronics, vol. 12, No. 8, Jan. 1997, pp. 819-826.
Ohno et al., “Electrolyte-Gated Graphene Field-Effect Transistors for Detecting pH and Protein Adsorption”, Nano Letters, vol. 9, No. 9, Jul. 28, 2009, pp. 3318-3322.
Palan et al., “New ISFET sensor interface circuit for biomedical applications”, Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, vol. 57, Nos. 1-3, Sep. 1999, pp. 63-68.
Park et al., “ISFET glucose sensor system with fast recovery characteristics by employing electrolysis”, Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, vol. 83, Nos. 1-3, Mar. 15, 2002, pp. 90-97.
Patolsky et al., “Nanowire-Based Biosensors”, Analytical Chemistry, vol. 78, No. 13, Jul. 1, 2006, pp. 4261-4269.
PCT/JP2005/001987, Search Report, dated Apr. 5, 2005.
PCT/JP2005/015522, Search Report, dated Sep. 27, 2005.
PCT/US2007/025721, Declaration of Non-Establishment of International Search Report, dated Jul. 15, 2008.
PCT/US2007/025721, Preliminary Report and Written Opinion on Patentability, dated Jun. 16, 2009.
PCT/US2009/003766, Search Report and Written Opinion, dated Apr. 8, 2010.
PCT/US2009/003797, Search Report and Written Opinion, dated Mar. 12, 2010.
PCT/US2009/005745, Search Report and Written Opinion, dated Dec. 11, 2009.
PCT/US2010/001543, Search Report and Written Opinion, dated Oct. 13, 2010.
PCT/US2010/001553, Search Report and Written Opinion, dated Jul. 28, 2010.
PCT/US2010/048835, Search Report and Written Opinion, dated Dec. 16, 2010.
PCT/US2011/042655, Search Report and Written Opinion, dated Oct. 21, 2011.
PCT/US2011/042660, Search Report and Written Opinion, dated Nov. 2, 2011.
PCT/US2011/042665, Search Report and Written Opinion, dated Nov. 2, 2011.
PCT/US2011/042668, Search Report and Written Opinion, dated Oct. 28, 2011.
PCT/US2011/042669, Search Report and Written Opinion, dated Jan. 9, 2012.
PCT/US2011/042683, Search Report and Written Opinion, dated Feb. 16, 2012.
PCT/US2012/058996, Search Report and Written Opinion, dated Jan. 22, 2013.
PCT/US2012/071471, Search Report and Written Opinion, dated Apr. 24, 2013.
PCT/US2012/071482, Search Report and Written Opinion, dated May 23, 2013.
PCT/US2013/022129, Search Report and Written Opinion, dated Aug. 9, 2013.
PCT/US2013/022140, Search Report and Written Opinion, dated May 2, 2013.
PCT/US2014/020887, Search Report and Written Opinion, dated May 30, 2014.
PCT/US2014/020892, Search Report and Written Opinion, dated Jun. 3, 2014.
PCT/US2014/040923, Search Report and Written Opinion, dated Sep. 1, 2014.
PCT/US2015/066052, Search Report and Written Opinion, dated Apr. 7, 2016.
Poghossian et al., “Functional testing and characterization of ISFETs on wafer level by means of a micro-droplet cell”, Sensors, vol. 6, No. 4, Apr. 2006, pp. 397-404.
Pollack et al., “Genome-wide analysis of DNA copy-number changes using cDNA microarrays”, Nature Genetics, vol. 23, No. 1, Sep. 1999, pp. 41-46.
Pourmand N., et al., “Direct Electrical Detection of DNA Synthesis,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Apr. 25, 2006, vol. 103, No. 17, pp. 6466-6470.
Pouthas et al., “Spatially resolved electronic detection of biopolymers”, Physical Review, vol. 70, No. 3, Sep. 2004, p. 031906-1-031906-8.
Premanode et al., “A composite ISFET readout circuit employing current feedback”, Sensors Actuators B: Chemical, vol. 127, No. 2, Nov. 2007, pp. 486-490.
Premanode et al., “A novel, low power biosensor for real time monitoring of creatinine and urea in peritoneal dialysis”, Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, vol. 120, No. 2, Jan. 2007, pp. 732-735.
Premanode et al., “Drift Reduction in Ion-Sensitive FETs using correlated double sampling”, Electronics Letters, vol. 43, No. 16, Aug. 2, 2007, pp. 857-859.
Premanode et al., “Ultra-low power precision ISFET readout using global current feedback”, Electronic Letters, vol. 42, No. 22, Oct. 26, 2006, pp. 1264-1265.
Purushothaman et al., “Protons and single nucleotide polymorphism detection: A simple use for the Ion Sensitive Field Effect Transistor”, Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, vol. 114, No. 2, Apr. 2006, pp. 964-968.
Purushothaman S., et al., “Towards Fast Solid State DNA Sequencing,” IEEE ISCAS Proceedings, Circuits and Systems, 2002, vol. 4, pp. IV-169-IV-172.
Rodriguez-Villegas, “Solution to trapped charge in FGMOS transistors”, Electronics Letters, vol. 39, No. 19, Oct. 2003, pp. 1416-1417.
Ronaghi M., et al., “A Sequencing Method Based on Real-Time Pyrophosphate,” Science, Jul. 17, 1998, vol. 281, pp. 363-365.
Rothberg J.M., et al., “An Integrated Semiconductor Device Enabling Non-optical Genome Sequencing,” Nature, Jul. 20, 2011, vol. 475, pp. 348-352.
Rowe et al., “An Array Immunosensor for Simultaneous Detection of Clinical Analytes”, Analytical Chemistry, vol. 71, No. 2, 1999, pp. 433-439.
Sakata et al., “Cell-based field effect devices for cell adhesion analysis”, Intl. Conf. on Microtechnologies in Medicine and Biology, May 9-12, 2006, Okinawa, Japan, 2006, pp. 177-179.
Sakata et al., “Detection of DNA recognition events using multi-well field effect transistor”, Biosensors & Bioelectronics, vol. 21, 2005, pp. 827-832.
Sakata et al., “Detection sensitivity of genetic field effect transistor combined with charged nanoparticle-DNA conjugate”, Intl. Conf. on Microtechnologies in Medicine and Biology, May 9-12, 2005, Okinawa, Japan, 2006, pp. 97-100.
Sakata et al., “Direct detection of single nucleotide polymorphism using genetic field effect transistor”, International Microprocesses and Nanotechnology Conference. Oct. 26-29, 2004. Osaka, Japan. Digest of Papers Microprocesses and Nanotechnology 2004. pp. 226-227.
Sakata et al., “Direct Detection of Single-Base Extension Reaction Using Genetic Field Effect Transistor”, Proc. of 3rd Ann. Intl. IEEE EMBS Special Topic Conf. on Microtechnologies in Medicine and Biology, Kahuku, Oahu, HI, May 12-15, 2005, pp. 219-222.
Sakata et al., “Direct transduction of allele-specific primer extension into electrical signal using genetic field effect transistor”, Biosensors & Bioelectronics, vol. 22, 2007, pp. 1311-1316.
Sakata et al., “DNA Analysis Chip Based on Field-Effect Transistors”, Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 44, No. 4B, 2005, pp. 2854-2859.
Sakata et al., “DNA Sequencing Using Genetic Field Effect Transistor”, 13th International Conference on Solid-State sensors, Actuators and Microsystems, vol. 2, Jun. 5-9, 2005, Seoul, Korea, pp. 1676-1679.
Sakata et al., “Immobilization of oligonucleotide probes on Si3N4 surface and its application to genetic field effect transistor”, Materials Science and Engineering: C, vol. 24, Nos. 6-8, Dec. 2004, pp. 827-832.
Sakata et al., “Potential Behavior of Biochemically Modified Gold Electrode for Extended-Gate Field-Effect Transistor”, Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 44, Part 1, No. 4S, Apr. 2005, pp. 2860-2863.
Sakata et al., “Potential response of genetic field effect transistor to charged nanoparticle-DNA conjugate”, International Microprocesses and Nanotechnology Conference. Oct. 25-28, 2005. Tokyo, Japan. Digest of Papers Microprocesses and Nanotechnology 2005. pp. 42-43.
Sakata et al., “Potentiometric Detection of Allele Specific Oligonucleotide Hybridization Using Genetic Field Effect Transistor”, Micro Total Analysis Systems, vol. 1,8th Intl. Conf. on Miniaturized Systems for Chemistry and Life Sciences, Sep. 26-30, 2004, Malmo, Sweden, pp. 300-302.
Sakata et al., “Potentiometric Detection of DNA Molecules Hybridization Using Gene Field Effect Transistor and Intercalator”, Materials Research Society Symposium Proceedings, vol. 782, Micro- and Nanosystems, Boston, Massachusetts, Jan. 2003, pp. 393-398.
Sakata et al., “Potentiometric Detection of DNA Using Genetic Transistor”, Denki Gakkai Kenkyukai Shiryo Chemical Sensor Kenkyukai, CHS-03-51-55, 2003, pp. 1-5.
Sakata et al., “Potentiometric Detection of Single Nucleotide Polymorphism by Using a Genetic Field-effect transistor”, ChemBioChem, vol. 6, No. 4, Apr. 2005, pp. 703-710.
Sakata T., et al., “DNA Sequencing Based on Intrinsic Molecular Charges,” Angewandte Chemie International, Mar. 27, 2006, vol. 45, No. 14, pp. 2225-2228.
Sakurai T., et al., “Real-Time Monitoring of DNA Polymerase Reactions by a Micro ISFET pH Sensor,” Analytical Chemistry, Sep. 1992, vol. 64, No. 17, pp. 1996-1997.
Salama, “CMOS luminescence detection lab-on-chip: modeling, design, and characterization”, Thesis, Presented at Stanford University, 2005, pp. ii-78.
Salama, “Modeling and simulation of luminescence detection platforms”, Biosensors & Bioelectronics, vol. 19, No. 11, Jun. 15, 2004, pp. 1377-1386.
Sawada et al., “A novel fused sensor for photo- and ion-sensing”, Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, vol. 106, No. 2, May 2005, pp. 614-618.
Sawada et al., “Highly sensitive ion sensors using charge transfer technique”, Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, vol. 98, No. 1, Mar. 2004, pp. 69-72.
Schasfoort et al., “A new approach to ImmunoFET operation”, Biosensors & Bioelectronics, vol. 5, No. 2, 1990, pp. 103-124.
Schasfoort et al., “Field-effect flow control for microfabricated fluidic networks”, Science, vol. 286. No. 5441, Oct. 29, 1999, pp. 942-945.
Schoning et al., “Bio FEDs (Field-Effect Devices): State-of-the-Art and New Directions”, Electroanalysis, vol. 18, Nos. 19-20, Sep. 2006, pp. 1893-1900.
Schroder, “6. Oxide and Interface Trapped Charges, Oxide Thickness”, Semiconductor Material and Device Characterization, John Wiley & Sons, ISBN: 978-0-471-73906-7, Feb. 2006, pp. 319-387.
Seong-Jin et al. “Label-Free CMOS DNA Quantification With On-Chip Noise Reduction Schemes” Solid-State Sensors, Actuators and Microsystems Conference, IEEE, Jun. 10, 2013, pp. 947-950.
Shah, “Microfabrication of a parellelrray DNA pyrosequencing chip”, NNIN REU Research Accomplishments, 2005, pp. 130-131.
Shepherd et al., “A biochemical translinear principle with weak inversion ISFETs”, IEEE Trans Circuits Syst-I, vol. 52, No. 12, Dec. 2005, pp. 2614-2619.
Shepherd et al., “A novel voltage-clamped CMOS ISFET sensor interface”, IEEE, 2007, pp. 3331-3334.
Shepherd et al., “Towards direct biochemical analysis with weak inversion ISFETS”, Intl Workshop on Biomedical, 2004, pp. S1.5-5-S1.5-8.
Shepherd et al., “Weak inversion ISFETs for ultra-low power biochemical sensing and real-time analysis”, Sensors Actuators B, vol. 107, 2005, pp. 468-473.
Shi et al., “Radical Capillary Array Electrophoresis Microplace and Scanner for High-Performance Nucleic Acid Analysis”, Analytical Chemistry, vol. 71, No. 23, 1999, pp. 5354-5361.
Simonian et al., “FET based biosensors for the direct detection of organophosphate neurotoxins”, Electroanalysis, vol. 16, No. 22, 2004, pp. 1896-1906.
Souteyrand et al., “Direct detection of the hybridization of synthetic homo-oligomer DNA sequences by field effect”, Journal of Physical Chemistry B, vol. 101, No. 15, 1997, pp. 2980-2985.
Starodub et al., “Immunosensor for the determination of the herbicide simazine based on an ion-selective field-effect transistor”, Analytica Chimica Acta, vol. 424, No. 1, Nov. 2000, pp. 37-43.
Takenaka et al., “DNA Sensing on a DNA Probe-Modified Electrode Using Ferrocenylnaphthalene Dimide as the Electrochemically Active Ligand”, Analytical Chemistry, vol. 72. No. 6, 2000, pp. 1334-1341.
Temes et al., “A Tutorial Discussion of the Oversampling Method for A/D and D/A Conversion”, IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems, vols. 2 of 4, 1990, 5 pages.
Thewes et al., “CMOS-based Biosensor Arrays”, Proceedings of the Design, Automation and Test in Europe Conference and Exhibition, 2005, 2 pages.
Tokuda et al., “A CMOS image sensor with optical and potential dual imaging function for on-chip bioscientific applications”, Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, vol. 125, No. 2, Jan. 2006, pp. 273-280.
Tomaszewski et al., “Electrical characterization of ISFETs”, Journal of Telecommunications and Information Technology, Mar. 2007, pp. 55-60.
Toumazou et al., “Using transistors to linearise biochemistry,” Electronics Letters, vol. 43, No. 2, Jan. 18, 2007, 3 pages.
Truman et al. “Monitoring liquid transport and chemical composition in lab on a chip systems using ion sensitive FET devices”, Lab on a Chip, vol. 6, No. 9, Jul. 2006, pp. 1220-1228.
Unknown, “ISFET Wikipedia article”, Wikipedia, Last modified Nov. 7, 2006.
Unknown, “OV5640 Datasheet Product Specification”, 1/4″ color CMOS QSXGA (5 megapixel) image sensor with OmniBSI technology. May 1, 2011, p. 1, line 9 and pp. 2-7, paragraph 1.
Uslu et al., “Labelfree fully electronic nucleic acid detection system based on a fieldeffect transistor device”, Biosensors and Bioelectronics, vol. 19. No. 12, Jul. 2004, pp. 1723-1731.
Van Der Schoot et al., “The Use of a Multi-ISFET Sensor Fabricated in a Single Substrate”, Sensors and Actuators, vol. 12, No. 4, Nove.-Dec. 1987, pp. 463-468.
Van Der Wouden et al., “Directional flow induced by synchronized longitudinal and zeta-potential controlling AC-electrical fields”, Lab Chip, vol. 6, No. 10, Oct. 2006, pp. 1300-1305.
Van Hal et al., “A general model to describe the electrostatic potential at electrolyte oxide interfaces”, Advances in Colloid and Interface Science, vol. 69, Nos. 1-3, Dec. 1996, pp. 31-62.
Van Kerkhof, “Development of an ISFET based heparin sensor using the ion-step measuring method”, Biosensors & Bioelectronics, vol. 8, Nos. 9-10, 1993, pp. 463-472.
Van Kerkhof et al., “ISFET Responses on a stepwise change in electrolyte concentration at constant pH”, Sensors Actuators B: Chemical, vol. 18-19, Mar. 1994, pp. 56-59.
Van Kerkhof et al., “The development of an ISFET-based heparin sensor,” Thesis 1994. Published Aug. 10, 1965.
Van Kerkhof et al., “The ISFET based heparin sensor with a monolayer of protamine as affinity ligand”, Biosensors & Bioelectronics, vol. 10, Nos. 3-4, 1995, pp. 269-282.
Vardalas, “Twists and Turns in the Development of the Transistor”, IEEE—USA Today's Engineer Online, May 2003, 6 pages.
Voigt et al., “Diamond-like carbon-gate pH-ISFET”, Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, vol. 44, Nos. 1-3, Oct. 1997, pp. 441-445.
Wagner et al., “All-in-one solid-state device based on a light-addressable potentiometric sensor platform”, Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, vol. 117, No. 2, Oct. 2006, pp. 472-479.
Wang et al., “Label-free detection of small-molecule-protein interactions by using nanowire nanosensors”, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 102, No. 9, Mar. 2005, pp. 3208-3212.
Wilhelm et al., “pH Sensor Based on Differential Measurements on One pH-FET Chip”, Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, vol. 4, Nos. 1-2, May 1991, pp. 145-149.
Woias et al., “Slow pH response effects of silicon nitride ISFET sensors”, Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, vol. 48, Nos. 1-3, May 1998, pp. 501-504.
Woias P., et al., “Modelling the Short-Time Response of ISFET Sensors,” Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, Mar. 1995, vol. 24, Nos. 1-3, pp. 211-217.
Wood et al., “Base composition-independent hybridization in tetramethylammonium chloride: a method for oligonucleotide screening of highly complex gene libraries”, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 82, No. 6, Mar. 1985, pp. 1585-1588.
Wu et al., “DNA and protein microarray printing on silicon nitride waveguide surfaces”, Biosensensors & Bioelectronics, vol. 21, No. 7, Jan. 2006, pp. 1252-1263.
Xu et al., “Analytical Aspects of FET-Based Biosensors”, Frontiers in Bioscience, vol. 10, Jan. 2005, pp. 420-430.
Yeowt.C.W., et al., “A Very Large Integrated pH-ISFET Sensor Array Chip Compatible with Standard CMOS Processes,” Sensor and Actuators B: Chemical, Oct. 1997, vol. 44, Nos. 1-3, pp. 434-440.
Yoshida et al., “Development of a Wide Range pH Sensor based on Electrolyte-Insulator-Semiconductor Structure with Corrosion-Resistant Al2O3—Ta2O5 and Al2O3—ZrO2”, Journal of the Electrochemical Society, vol. 151, No. 3, 2004, pp. H53-H58.
Yuqing et al., “Ion sensitive field effect transducer-based biosensors”, Biotechnology Advances, vol. 21, No. 6, Sep. 2003, pp. 527-534.
Zhang et al., “32-Channel Full Customized CMOS Biosensor Chip for Extracellular neural Signal Recording”, Proc. of the 2nd Intl. IEEE EMBs Conf. on Neural Engineering, Arlington, Virginia, Mar. 16-19, 2005, pp. v-viii.
Zhao et al., “Floating-Gate Ion Sensitive Field-Effect Transistor for Chemical and Biological Sensing”, MRS Proceedings, vol. 828, 2005, pp. 349-354.
Zhou et al., “Quantitative detection of single nucleotide polymorphisms for a pooled sample by a bioluminometric assay coupled with modified primer extension reactions (BAMPER)”, Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 29, No. 19, Oct. 2001, (e93), 1-11.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20230125333 A1 Apr 2023 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
61833375 Jun 2013 US
Divisions (2)
Number Date Country
Parent 16663052 Oct 2019 US
Child 17070142 US
Parent 14293247 Jun 2014 US
Child 16663052 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 17070142 Oct 2020 US
Child 18045106 US