The present disclosure relates to sensors for chemical analysis, and to methods for manufacturing such sensors.
A variety of types of chemical sensors have been used in the detection of chemical processes. One type is a chemically-sensitive field effect transistor (chemFET). A chemFET includes a source and a drain separated by a channel region, and a chemically sensitive area coupled to the channel region. The operation of the chemFET is based on the modulation of channel conductance, caused by changes in charge at the sensitive area due to a chemical reaction occurring nearby. The modulation of the channel conductance changes the threshold voltage of the chemFET, which can be measured to detect and/or determine characteristics of the chemical reaction. The threshold voltage may for example be measured by applying appropriate bias voltages to the source and drain, and measuring a resulting current flowing through the chemFET. As another example, the threshold voltage may be measured by driving a known current through the chemFET, and measuring a resulting voltage at the source or drain.
An ion-sensitive field effect transistor (ISFET) is a type of chemFET that includes an ion-sensitive layer at the sensitive area. The presence of ions in an analyte solution alters the surface potential at the interface between the ion-sensitive layer and the analyte solution, due to the protonation or deprotonation of surface charge groups caused by the ions present in the analyte solution. The change in surface potential at the sensitive area of the ISFET affects the threshold voltage of the device, which can be measured to indicate the presence and/or concentration of ions within the solution.
Arrays of ISFETs may be used for monitoring chemical reactions, such as DNA sequencing reactions, based on the detection of ions present, generated, or used during the reactions. See, for example, U.S. Pat. No. 7,948,015 to Rothberg et al., which is incorporated by reference herein. More generally, large arrays of chemFETs or other types of chemical sensors may be employed to detect and measure static and/or dynamic amounts or concentrations of a variety of analytes (e.g. hydrogen ions, other ions, compounds, etc.) in a variety of processes. The processes may for example be biological or chemical reactions, cell or tissue cultures or monitoring neural activity, nucleic acid sequencing, etc.
An issue that arises in the operation of large scale chemical sensor arrays is the susceptibility of the sensor output signals to noise. Specifically, the noise affects the accuracy of the downstream signal processing used to determine the characteristics of the chemical and/or biological process being detected by the sensors.
It is therefore desirable to provide devices including low noise chemical sensors, and methods for manufacturing such devices.
In one implementation, a chemical sensor is described. The chemical sensor includes a chemically-sensitive field effect transistor including a floating gate conductor having an upper surface. A dielectric material defines an opening extending to the upper surface of the floating gate conductor. A conductive sidewall spacer is on a sidewall of the opening and contacts the upper surface of the floating gate conductor.
In another implementation, a method for manufacturing a chemical sensor is described. The method includes forming a chemically-sensitive field effect transistor including a floating gate conductor having an upper surface. The method further includes forming a dielectric material defining an opening extending to the upper surface of the floating gate conductor. The method further includes forming a conductive sidewall spacer on a sidewall of the opening and contacting the floating gate conductor.
Particular aspects of one more implementations of the subject matter described in this specification are set forth in the drawings and the description below. Other features, aspects, and advantages of the subject matter will become apparent from the description, the drawings, and the claims.
A chemical detection device is described that includes low noise chemical sensors, such as chemically-sensitive field effect transistors (chemFETs), for detecting chemical reactions within overlying, operationally associated reaction regions.
Reducing the plan or top view area (or footprint) of individual chemical sensors and the overlying reaction regions allows for higher density devices. However, as the dimensions of the chemical sensors are reduced, Applicants have found that a corresponding reduction in the sensing surface area of the sensors can significantly impact performance.
For example, for chemical sensors having sensing surfaces defined at the bottom of the reaction regions, reducing the plan view dimensions (e.g. the width or diameter) of the reaction regions results in a similar reduction in the sensing surface areas. Applicants have found that as the sensing surface area is reduced to technology limits, fluidic noise due to the random fluctuation of charge on the sensing surface contributes to an increasing proportion of the total variation in sensing surface potential. This can significantly reduce the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the sensor output signal, which affects the accuracy of the downstream signal processing used to determine the characteristics of the chemical and/or biological process being detected by the sensor.
Chemical sensors described herein have sensing surface areas which are not limited to a two-dimensional area at the bottom of the reaction regions. In embodiments described herein, the sensing surface of the chemical sensor includes a generally horizontal portion along the bottom surface of the reaction region, as well as a generally vertical portion provided by a sidewall spacer on a sidewall of the reaction region.
By extending the sensing surface in a generally vertical direction, the chemical sensor can have a small footprint, while also having a sufficiently large sensing surface area to avoid the noise issues associated with small sensing surfaces. The footprint of a chemical sensor is determined in part by the width (e.g. diameter) of the overlying reaction region and can be made small, allowing for a high density array. In addition, because the sensing surface extends up the sidewall, the sensing surface area can be relatively large. As a result, low noise chemical sensors can be provided in a high density array, such that the characteristics of reactions can be accurately detected.
The reference electrode 108 may be of any suitable type or shape, including a concentric cylinder with a fluid passage or a wire inserted into a lumen of passage 111. The reagents 114 may be driven through the fluid pathways, valves, and flow cell 101 by pumps, gas pressure, or other suitable methods, and may be discarded into the waste container 106 after exiting the outlet 103 of the flow cell 101. The fluidics controller 118 may control driving forces for the reagents 114 and the operation of valve 112 and valve block 116 with suitable software.
The microwell array 107 includes an array of reaction regions as described herein, also referred to herein as microwells, which are operationally associated with corresponding chemical sensors in the sensor array. For example, each reaction region may be coupled to a chemical sensor suitable for detecting an analyte or reaction property of interest within that reaction region. The microwell array 107 may be integrated in the integrated circuit device 100, so that the microwell array 107 and the sensor array are part of a single device or chip.
The flow cell 101 may have a variety of configurations for controlling the path and flow rate of reagents 114 over the microwell array 107. The array controller 124 provides bias voltages and timing and control signals to the integrated circuit device 100 for reading the chemical sensors of the sensor array. The array controller 124 also provides a reference bias voltage to the reference electrode 108 to bias the reagents 114 flowing over the microwell array 107.
During an experiment, the array controller 124 collects and processes output signals from the chemical sensors of the sensor array through output ports on the integrated circuit device 100 via bus 127. The array controller 124 may be a computer or other computing means. The array controller 124 may include memory for storage of data and software applications, a processor for accessing data and executing applications, and components that facilitate communication with the various components of the system in
The values of the output signals of the chemical sensors indicate physical and/or chemical parameters of one or more reactions taking place in the corresponding reaction regions in the microwell array 107. For example, in an exemplary embodiment, the values of the output signals may be processed using the techniques disclosed in Rearick et al., U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/339,846, filed Dec. 29, 2011, based on U.S. Prov. Pat. Appl. Nos. 61/428,743, filed Dec. 30, 2010, and 61/429,328, filed Jan. 3, 2011, and in Hubbell, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/339,753, filed Dec. 29, 2011, based on U.S. Prov. Pat. Appl. No. 61/428,097, filed Dec. 29, 2010, which are all incorporated by reference herein in their entirety.
The user interface 128 may display information about the flow cell 101 and the output signals received from chemical sensors in the sensor array on the integrated circuit device 100. The user interface 128 may also display instrument settings and controls, and allow a user to enter or set instrument settings and controls.
In an exemplary embodiment, during the experiment the fluidics controller 118 may control delivery of the individual reagents 114 to the flow cell 101 and integrated circuit device 100 in a predetermined sequence, for predetermined durations, at predetermined flow rates. The array controller 124 can then collect and analyze the output signals of the chemical sensors indicating chemical reactions occurring in response to the delivery of the reagents 114.
During the experiment, the system may also monitor and control the temperature of the integrated circuit device 100, so that reactions take place and measurements are made at a known predetermined temperature.
The system may be configured to let a single fluid or reagent contact the reference electrode 108 throughout an entire multi-step reaction during operation. The valve 112 may be shut to prevent any wash solution 110 from flowing into passage 109 as the reagents 114 are flowing. Although the flow of wash solution may be stopped, there may still be uninterrupted fluid and electrical communication between the reference electrode 108, passage 109, and the microwell array 107. The distance between the reference electrode 108 and the junction between passages 109 and 111 may be selected so that little or no amount of the reagents flowing in passage 109 and possibly diffusing into passage 111 reach the reference electrode 108. In an exemplary embodiment, the wash solution 110 may be selected as being in continuous contact with the reference electrode 108, which may be especially useful for multi-step reactions using frequent wash steps.
The chemical sensors of the sensor array 205 are responsive to (and generate output signals) chemical reactions within associated reaction regions in the microwell array 107 to detect an analyte or reaction property of interest. The chemical sensors of the sensor array 205 may for example be chemically sensitive field-effect transistors (chemFETs), such as ion-sensitive field effect transistors (ISFETs). Examples of chemical sensors and array configurations that may be used in embodiments are described in U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2010/0300559, No. 2010/0197507, No. 2010/0301398, No. 2010/0300895, No. 2010/0137143, and No. 2009/0026082, and U.S. Pat. No. 7,575,865, each which are incorporated by reference herein.
Chemical sensor 350 is coupled to corresponding reaction region 301, and chemical sensor 351 is coupled to corresponding reaction region 302. Chemical sensor 350 is representative of the chemical sensors in the sensor array. In the illustrated example, the chemical sensor 350 is a chemically-sensitive field effect transistor (chemFET), more specifically an ion-sensitive field effect transistor (ISFET) in this example.
The chemical sensor 350 includes a floating gate structure 318 having a sensor plate 320 underlying the reaction region 301. As can be seen in
The chemical sensor 350 also includes a source region 321 and a drain region 322 within a semiconductor substrate 354. The source region 321 and the drain region 322 comprise doped semiconductor material have a conductivity type different from the conductivity type of the substrate 354. For example, the source region 321 and the drain region 322 may comprise doped P-type semiconductor material, and the substrate may comprise doped N-type semiconductor material.
Channel region 323 separates the source region 321 and the drain region 322. The floating gate structure 318 overlies the channel region 323, and is separated from the substrate 354 by a gate dielectric 352. The gate dielectric 352 may be for example silicon dioxide. Alternatively, other dielectrics may be used for the gate dielectric 352.
As shown in
The dimensions of the openings, and their pitch, can vary from implementation to implementation. In some embodiments, the openings can have a characteristic diameter, defined as the square root of 4 times the plan view cross-sectional area (A) divided by Pi (e.g., sqrt(4*A/π), of not greater than 5 micrometers, such as not greater than 3.5 micrometers, not greater than 2.0 micrometers, not greater than 1.6 micrometers, not greater than 1.0 micrometers, not greater than 0.8 micrometers, not greater than 0.6 micrometers, not greater than 0.4 micrometers, not greater than 0.2 micrometers or even not greater than 0.1 micrometers.
The chemical sensor 350 includes an electrically conductive sidewall spacer 370 on the sidewall 303 of the dielectric material 310. In the illustrated embodiment, the inner surface 371 of the conductive sidewall spacer 370 is an outer surface of the reaction region 301. In addition, the upper surface 331 of the sensor plate 320 is a bottom surface of the reaction region 301. That is, there is no intervening deposited material layer between the inner surface 371 of the conductive sidewall spacer 370 and the reaction region 301, or between the upper surface 331 of the sensor plate 320 and the reaction region 301. As a result of this structure, the upper surface 331 of the sensor plate 320 and the inner surface 371 of the conductive sidewall spacer 370 is cup-shaped and acts as the sensing surface of the chemical sensor 350. The sensor plate 320 and the sidewall spacer 370 may each comprise one or more of a variety of different materials to facilitate sensitivity to particular ions (e.g. hydrogen ions).
The cup-shaped sensing surface allows the chemical sensor 350 to have a small plan view area, while also having a sufficiently large surface area to avoid the noise issues associated with small sensing surfaces. The plan view area of the chemical sensor is determined in part by the width (or diameter) of the reaction region 301 and can be made small, allowing for a high density array. In addition, because the sensing surface extends up the sidewall 303, the sensing surface area depends upon the distance of this extension and the circumference of the reaction region 301, and can be relatively large. As a result, low noise chemical sensors 350, 351 can be provided in a high density array, such that the characteristics of reactions can be accurately detected.
During manufacturing and/or operation of the device, a thin oxide 390 of the material of the electrically conductive sidewall spacer 370 may be grown on the inner surface 371 which acts as a sensing material (e.g. an ion-sensitive sensing material) for the chemical sensor 350. Similarly, a thin oxide 392 of the material of the electrically conductive sensor plate 320 may be grown on the upper surface 331 which also acts as a sensing material. Whether an oxide is formed depends on the conductive materials, the manufacturing processes performed, and the conditions under which the device is operated.
In some embodiments, the sidewall spacer 370 and the upper layer of the sensor plate 320 may be the same material. For example, in one embodiment the sidewall spacer 370 and the upper layer of the sensor plate 320 may each be titanium nitride, and titanium oxide or titanium oxynitride may be grown on the inner surface 371 and the upper surface 331 during manufacturing and/or during exposure to solutions during use.
Alternatively, the sidewall spacer 370 and the upper layer of the sensor plate 320 may comprise different materials. In such a case, the upper layer of the sensor plate 320 may be a material that provides relatively high buffering of the particular ions of interest (e.g. hydrogen ions) compared to material of the sidewall spacer 370 for the given operating conditions. For example, in one embodiment in which the operational pH level of the solution is between 7 and 9, the upper layer of the sensor plate 320 is titanium nitride, while the sidewall spacer 320 is hafnium. As described in more detail below, the use of different materials for the sidewall spacer 370 and the upper layer of the sensor plate 320 can enable the SNR of the sensor output signal of the chemical sensor 350 to be maximized.
In the illustrated example, the sidewall spacer 370 and the sensor plate 320 are each shown as single layers of material. More generally, the sidewall spacer 370 and the sensor plate 320 may each comprise one or more layers of a variety of electrically conductive materials, such as metals or ceramics, depending upon the implementation. The conductive material can be for example a metallic material or alloy thereof, or can be a ceramic material, or a combination thereof. An exemplary metallic material includes one of aluminum, copper, nickel, titanium, silver, gold, platinum, hafnium, lanthanum, tantalum, tungsten, iridium, zirconium, palladium, or a combination thereof. An exemplary ceramic material includes one of titanium nitride, titanium aluminum nitride, titanium oxynitride, tantalum nitride, or a combination thereof.
In some alternative embodiments, an additional conformal sensing material (not shown) is deposited on the inner surface 371 of the conductive sidewall spacer 370 and on the upper surface 331 of the sensor plate 320. The sensing material may comprise one or more of a variety of different materials to facilitate sensitivity to particular ions. For example, silicon nitride or silicon oxynitride, as well as metal oxides such as silicon oxide, aluminum or tantalum oxides, generally provide sensitivity to hydrogen ions, whereas sensing materials comprising polyvinyl chloride containing valinomycin provide sensitivity to potassium ions. Materials sensitive to other ions such as sodium, silver, iron, bromine, iodine, calcium, and nitrate may also be used, depending upon the implementation.
As shown in the plan view of
Referring back to
The amplitude of the desired signal detected in response to the charge 324 is a superposition of the interface between the analyte solution and the sidewall spacer 370, and the interface between the analyte solution and the sensor plate 320. Because the charge is more highly concentrated near the bottom of the reaction region 301, in some embodiments the material for the sensor plate 320 is chosen which has a relatively high buffering capacity for the particular ions of interest (e.g. hydrogen ions) for the given operating conditions. In doing so, the sensor plate 320 can maximally detect signal from an area of high charge concentration.
The buffering capacity of the material of the sidewall spacer 370 is a tradeoff between the amplitude of the desired signal detected in response to the charge 324, and the fluidic noise due to random fluctuation of charge at the interface between the analyte solution and the sidewall spacer 370/sensor plate 320. A relatively high buffering material for the sidewall spacer 370 increases the effective fluidic interface area for the chemical sensor 350, which reduces the fluidic noise. However, since the surface density of the charge 324 decreases with distance from the bottom of the reaction region, the high buffering material detects a greater proportion of the signal from areas having lower charge concentration, which can reduce the overall amplitude of the desired signal detected by the sensor 350. In contrast, a relatively low buffering material for the sidewall spacer 370 reduces the effective sensing surface area and thus increases the fluidic noise, but also increases the overall amplitude of the desired signal detected by the sensor 350 due to a greater proportion of the signal being contributed by the sensor plate 320.
For a very small sensing surface area, Applicants have found that the fluidic noise changes as a function of the sensing surface area differently than the amplitude of the desired signal. Because the SNR of the sensor output signal is the ratio of these two quantities, there is an optimal material for the sidewall spacer 370 having buffering characteristics at which SNR is maximum.
The material having the optimal buffering capacity for the sidewall spacer 370 can vary from embodiment to embodiment depending on the material characteristics of the sensor plate 320, the volume, shape, aspect ratio (such as base width-to-well depth ratio), and other dimensional characteristics of the reaction regions, the nature of the reaction taking place, as well as the reagents, byproducts, or labeling techniques (if any) that are employed. The optimal material may for example be determined empirically.
In an embodiment, reactions carried out in the reaction region 301 can be analytical reactions to identify or determine characteristics or properties of an analyte of interest. Such reactions can generate directly or indirectly byproducts that affect the amount of charge adjacent to the sensor plate 320 and the sidewall spacer 370. If such byproducts are produced in small amounts or rapidly decay or react with other constituents, multiple copies of the same analyte may be analyzed in the reaction region 301 at the same time in order to increase the output signal generated. In an embodiment, multiple copies of an analyte may be attached to a solid phase support 312, either before or after deposition into the reaction region 301. The solid phase support 312 may be microparticles, nanoparticles, beads, solid or porous comprising gels, or the like. For simplicity and ease of explanation, solid phase support 312 is also referred herein as a particle. For a nucleic acid analyte, multiple, connected copies may be made by rolling circle amplification (RCA), exponential RCA, or like techniques, to produce an amplicon without the need of a solid support.
In various exemplary embodiments, the methods, systems, and computer readable media described herein may advantageously be used to process and/or analyze data and signals obtained from electronic or charged-based nucleic acid sequencing. In electronic or charged-based sequencing (such as, pH-based sequencing), a nucleotide incorporation event may be determined by detecting ions (e.g., hydrogen ions) that are generated as natural by-products of polymerase-catalyzed nucleotide extension reactions. This may be used to sequence a sample or template nucleic acid, which may be a fragment of a nucleic acid sequence of interest, for example, and which may be directly or indirectly attached as a clonal population to a solid support, such as a particle, microparticle, bead, etc. The sample or template nucleic acid may be operably associated to a primer and polymerase and may be subjected to repeated cycles or “flows” of deoxynucleoside triphosphate (“dNTP”) addition (which may be referred to herein as “nucleotide flows” from which nucleotide incorporations may result) and washing. The primer may be annealed to the sample or template so that the primer's 3′ end can be extended by a polymerase whenever dNTPs complementary to the next base in the template are added. Then, based on the known sequence of nucleotide flows and on measured output signals of the chemical sensors indicative of ion concentration during each nucleotide flow, the identity of the type, sequence and number of nucleotide(s) associated with a sample nucleic acid present in a reaction region coupled to a chemical sensor can be determined.
A first layer of the dielectric material 319 can then be deposited over the lowermost conductive material elements. Conductive plugs can then be formed within vias etched in the first layer of dielectric material 319 to contact the lowermost conductive material elements of the floating gate structures. A layer of conductive material can then be deposited on the first layer of the dielectric material 319 and patterned to form second conductive material elements electrically connected to the conductive plugs. This process can then be repeated multiple times to form the completed floating gate structure 318 shown in
Forming the structure in
Next, the dielectric material 310 of the structure in
The openings 500, 502 may for example be formed by using a lithographic process to pattern a layer of photoresist on the dielectric material 310 to define the locations of the openings 500, 502, and then anisotropically etching the dielectric material 310 using the patterned photoresist as an etch mask. The anisotropic etching of the dielectric material 310 may for example be a dry etch process, such as a fluorine based Reactive Ion Etching (RIE) process.
In the illustrated embodiment, the openings 500, 502 are separated by a distance that 530 that is equal to their width 520. Alternatively, the separation distance 530 between adjacent openings may be less than the width 520. For example, the separation distance 530 may be a minimum feature size for the process (e.g. a lithographic process) used to form the openings 500, 502. In such a case, the distance 530 may be significantly less than the width 520.
Next, a conformal layer of conductive material 600 is deposited on the structure illustrated in
The conductive material 600 may be deposited using various techniques, such as sputtering, reactive sputtering, atomic layer deposition (ALD), low pressure chemical vapor deposition (LPCVD), plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD), metal organic chemical vapor deposition (MOCVD) etc.
Next, an anisotropic etching process is performed on the conductive material 600 illustrated in
While the present invention is disclosed by reference to the preferred embodiments and examples detailed above, it is to be understood that these examples are intended in an illustrative rather than in a limiting sense. It is contemplated that modifications and combinations will readily occur to those skilled in the art, which modifications and combinations will be within the spirit of the invention and the scope of the following claims.
This application is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/801,002 filed Mar. 13, 2013; the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3531258 | Merrifield | Sep 1970 | A |
4008736 | Wittmann-Liebold et al. | Feb 1977 | A |
4086642 | Yoshida et al. | Apr 1978 | A |
4411741 | Janata | Oct 1983 | A |
4437969 | Covington et al. | Mar 1984 | A |
4438354 | Haque et al. | Mar 1984 | A |
4444644 | Hiramoto | Apr 1984 | A |
4490678 | Kuisl et al. | Dec 1984 | A |
4558845 | Hunkapiller | Dec 1985 | A |
4641084 | Komatsu | Feb 1987 | A |
4660063 | Anthony | Apr 1987 | A |
4691167 | Vlekkert et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4701253 | Litenberg et al. | Oct 1987 | A |
4722830 | Urie et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
4743954 | Brown | May 1988 | A |
4764797 | Shaw et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
4777019 | Dandekar | Oct 1988 | A |
4822566 | Newman | Apr 1989 | A |
4863849 | Melamede | Sep 1989 | A |
4864229 | Lauks et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4874499 | Smith et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
4893088 | Myers et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4927736 | Mueller et al. | May 1990 | A |
4971903 | Hyman | Nov 1990 | A |
5009766 | Lauks | Apr 1991 | A |
5038192 | Bonneau | Aug 1991 | A |
5082788 | Farnsworth et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5110441 | Kinlen et al. | May 1992 | A |
5113870 | Rossenfeld | May 1992 | A |
5126022 | Soane et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5126759 | Small et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5132418 | Caruthers et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5138251 | Koshiishi et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5140393 | Hijikihigawa et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5142236 | Maloberti et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5151587 | Machida et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5151759 | Vinal | Sep 1992 | A |
5164319 | Hafeman et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5202576 | Liu et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5284566 | Cuomo et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5313984 | Garwood, Jr. et al. | May 1994 | A |
5317407 | Michon | May 1994 | A |
5319226 | Sohn et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5407854 | Baxter et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5436149 | Barnes | Jul 1995 | A |
5439839 | Jang | Aug 1995 | A |
5466348 | Holm-Kennedy | Nov 1995 | A |
5475337 | Tatsumi | Dec 1995 | A |
5490971 | Gifford et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5498392 | Wilding et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5520787 | Hanagan et al. | May 1996 | A |
5554339 | Cozzette et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5583462 | Grasshoff | Dec 1996 | A |
5587128 | Wilding et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5587894 | Naruo | Dec 1996 | A |
5593838 | Zanzucchi et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5600451 | Maki | Feb 1997 | A |
5627403 | Bacchetta et al. | May 1997 | A |
5631704 | Dickinson et al. | May 1997 | A |
5637469 | Wilding et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5646558 | Jamshidi et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5650649 | Tsukiji | Jul 1997 | A |
5702964 | Lee | Dec 1997 | A |
5793230 | Chu et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5830645 | Pinkel et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5846708 | Hollis et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5894284 | Garrity et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5907765 | Lescouzeres et al. | May 1999 | A |
5911873 | McCarron et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5912560 | Pasternak | Jun 1999 | A |
5922591 | Anderson et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5923421 | Rajic et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5944970 | Rosenblatt | Aug 1999 | A |
5958703 | Dower et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5965452 | Kovacs | Oct 1999 | A |
6001299 | Kawabe et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6002299 | Thomsen | Dec 1999 | A |
6010607 | Ramsey | Jan 2000 | A |
6021172 | Fossum et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6033546 | Ramsey | Mar 2000 | A |
6054034 | Soane et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6107032 | Kilger et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6191444 | Clampitt et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6195585 | Karunasiri et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6210891 | Nyren et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6255678 | Sawada et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6262568 | Komatsu et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6274320 | Rothberg et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6275061 | Tomita | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6280586 | Wolf et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6294133 | Sawada et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6327410 | Walt et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6353324 | Uber, III et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6355431 | Chee et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6361671 | Mathies et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6372291 | Hua et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6376256 | Dunnington et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6384684 | Redman-White | May 2002 | B1 |
6399952 | Maher et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6403957 | Fodor et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6406848 | Bridgham et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6413792 | Sauer et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6429027 | Chee et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6432360 | Church | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6433386 | Yun et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6459398 | Gureshnik et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6465178 | Chappa et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6475728 | Martin et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6482639 | Snow et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6485944 | Church et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6490220 | Merritt et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6499499 | Dantsker et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6511803 | Church et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6518024 | Choong et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6518146 | Singh et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6535824 | Mansky et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6537881 | Rangarajan et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6538593 | Yang et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6545620 | Groeneweg | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6571189 | Jensen et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6602702 | McDevitt et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6605428 | Kilger et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6613513 | Parce et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6613525 | Nelson et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6618083 | Chen et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6624637 | Pechstein | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6627154 | Goodman et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6654505 | Bridgham et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6657269 | Migliorato et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6671341 | Kinget et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6682899 | Bryan et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6682936 | Kovacs | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6686638 | Fischer et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6700814 | Nahas et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6703660 | Yitzchaik et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6716629 | Hess et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6762022 | Makarov et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6770472 | Manalis et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6780591 | Williams et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6787111 | Roach et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6795006 | Delight et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6806052 | Bridgham et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6828100 | Ronaghi | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6831994 | Bridgham et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6841128 | Kambara et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6859570 | Walt et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6878255 | Wang et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6888194 | Yoshino | May 2005 | B2 |
6898121 | Chien et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6906524 | Chung et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6919211 | Fodor et al. | Jul 2005 | B1 |
6926865 | Howard | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6927045 | Hadd et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6929944 | Matson | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6939451 | Zhao et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6953958 | Baxter et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6958216 | Kelley et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6960437 | Enzelberger et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6969488 | Bridgham et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6998274 | Chee et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7008550 | Li et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7019305 | Eversmann et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7022288 | Boss | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7033754 | Chee et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7037687 | Williams et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7045097 | Kovacs | May 2006 | B2 |
7049645 | Sawada et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7060431 | Chee et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7067886 | Bonges et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7084641 | Brederlow et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7085502 | Shushakob et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7087387 | Gerdes et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7090975 | Schultz et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7091059 | Rhodes | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7092757 | Larson et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7097973 | Zenhausern | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7105300 | Parce et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7106089 | Nakano et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7129554 | Lieber et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7169560 | Lapidus et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7173445 | Fujii et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7190026 | Lotfi et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7192745 | Jaeger | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7193453 | Wei et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7211390 | Rothberg | May 2007 | B2 |
7220550 | Keen | May 2007 | B2 |
7223371 | Hayenga et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7223540 | Pourmand et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7226734 | Chee et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7229799 | Williams | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7235389 | Lim et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7238323 | Knapp et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7239188 | Xu et al. | Jul 2007 | B1 |
7244559 | Rothberg et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7244567 | Chen | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7264929 | Rothberg et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7264934 | Fuller | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7265929 | Umeda et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7267751 | Gelbart et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7276749 | Martin et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7279588 | Hong et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7282370 | Bridgham et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7285384 | Fan et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7291496 | Holm-Kennedy | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7297518 | Quake et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7298475 | Gandhi et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7303875 | Bock et al. | Dec 2007 | B1 |
7317216 | Holm-Kennedy | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7317484 | Dosluoglu et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7323305 | Leamon et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7335526 | Peters et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7335762 | Rothberg et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7359058 | Kranz et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7361946 | Johnson et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7363717 | Ekseth et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7381936 | Tan et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7394263 | Pechstein et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7419636 | Aker et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7425431 | Church et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7455971 | Chee et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7462452 | Williams et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7462512 | Levon et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7462709 | Jaeger | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7465512 | Wright et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7466258 | Akopyan et al. | Dec 2008 | B1 |
7470352 | Eversmann et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7476504 | Turner | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7482153 | Okada et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7482677 | Lee et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7499513 | Tetzlaff et al. | Mar 2009 | B1 |
7515124 | Yaguma et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7534097 | Wong et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7538827 | Chou | May 2009 | B2 |
7575865 | Leamon et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7576037 | Engelhardt et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7595883 | El Gamal et al. | Sep 2009 | B1 |
7605650 | Forbes | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7608810 | Yamada | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7609093 | Sarig et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7609303 | Lee | Oct 2009 | B1 |
7612369 | Stasiak | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7612817 | Tay | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7614135 | Santini, Jr. et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7622294 | Walt et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7645596 | Williams et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7649358 | Toumazou et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7667501 | Surendranath et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7686929 | Toumazou et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7695907 | Miyahara et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7733401 | Takeda | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7772383 | Chakrabarti et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7785785 | Pourmand et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7785790 | Church et al. | Aug 2010 | B1 |
7794584 | Chodavarapu et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7821806 | Horiuchi | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7824900 | Iwadate et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7838226 | Kamahori et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7842377 | Lanphere et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7842457 | Berka et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7859029 | Lee et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7859291 | Kim | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7875440 | Williams et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7884398 | Levon et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7885490 | Heideman et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7888013 | Miyahara et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7888015 | Toumazou et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7888708 | Yazawa et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7890891 | Stuber et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7898277 | Weir | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7923240 | Su | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7927797 | Nobile et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7932034 | Esfandyarpour et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7948015 | Rothberg et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7955995 | Kakehata et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7960776 | Kim et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7972828 | Ward et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7981362 | Glezer et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8012690 | Berka et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8017938 | Gomez et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8035175 | Shim et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8052863 | Suzuki et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8067731 | Matyjaszczyk et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8072188 | Yorinobu et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8114591 | Toumazou et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8124936 | Lagna | Feb 2012 | B1 |
8133698 | Silver | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8138496 | Li et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8154480 | Shishido et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8199859 | Zerbe et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8217433 | Fife | Jul 2012 | B1 |
8227877 | Lee et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8231831 | Hartzell et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8232813 | Burdett et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8247849 | Fife et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8248356 | Chen | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8262900 | Rothberg et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8263336 | Rothberg et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8264014 | Rothberg et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8269261 | Rothberg | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8277628 | Ronaghi et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8293082 | Rothberg et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8306757 | Rothberg et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8313625 | Rothberg et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8313639 | Rothberg et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8317999 | Rothberg et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8340914 | Gatewood et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8343856 | Therrien et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8349167 | Rothberg et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8357547 | Lee et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8361713 | Bridgham et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8383396 | Kamahori et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8415716 | Rothberg et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8421437 | Levine | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8426898 | Rothberg et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8426899 | Rothberg et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8435395 | Rothberg et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8441044 | Rothberg et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8445194 | Drmanac et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8445945 | Rothberg et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8449824 | Sun | May 2013 | B2 |
8450781 | Rothberg et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8470164 | Rothberg et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8487790 | Fife et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8492800 | Rothberg et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8496802 | Rothberg et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8502278 | Rothberg et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8519448 | Rothberg et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8524057 | Rothberg et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8530941 | Rothberg et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8535513 | Rothberg et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8552771 | Jordan et al. | Oct 2013 | B1 |
8558288 | Rothberg et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8575664 | Rothberg et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8592154 | Rearick | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8653567 | Fife | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8658017 | Rothberg et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8673627 | Nobile et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8685230 | Rothberg et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8685298 | Rothberg et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8728844 | Liu et al. | May 2014 | B1 |
8731847 | Johnson et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8742469 | Milgrew | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8742472 | Rothberg et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8747748 | Li et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8748947 | Milgrew et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8764969 | Rothberg et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8766327 | Milgrew | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8766328 | Rothberg et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8776573 | Rearick et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8786331 | Jordan et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8796036 | Fife et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8821798 | Bustillo et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8823380 | Levine et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8841217 | Fife et al. | Sep 2014 | B1 |
8847637 | Guyton | Sep 2014 | B1 |
8912005 | Fife et al. | Dec 2014 | B1 |
8945912 | Bashir et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8962366 | Putnam et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8963216 | Fife et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8983783 | Johnson et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9023674 | Shen et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9164070 | Fife | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9201041 | Dalton et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9270264 | Jordan et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9389199 | Cheng et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
20010024790 | Kambara et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20020001801 | Fan et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020012930 | Rothberg et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020012933 | Rothberg et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020012937 | Tender et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020029971 | Kovacs | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020042059 | Makarov et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020042388 | Cooper et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020050611 | Yitzchaik et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020061529 | Bridgham et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020081714 | Jain et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020085136 | Moon et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020086318 | Manalis et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020094533 | Hess et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020117694 | Migliorato et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020132221 | Chee et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020150909 | Stuelpnagel et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020168678 | Williams et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020187515 | Chee et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030020334 | Nozu et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030044799 | Matson | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030044833 | Benchikh et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030054396 | Weiner | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030064366 | Hardin et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030068629 | Rothberg et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030077615 | Bridgham et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030100102 | Rothberg et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030102510 | Lim et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030108867 | Chee et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030119020 | Stevens et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030124572 | Umek et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030124599 | Chen et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030141928 | Lee | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030141929 | Casper et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030148301 | Aono et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030148344 | Rothberg et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030152929 | Howard | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030152994 | Woudenberg et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030155942 | Thewes | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030157504 | Chee et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030175990 | Hayenga et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030186262 | Cailloux | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030211502 | Sauer et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030215791 | Garini et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030215857 | Kilger et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030224419 | Corcoran et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030231531 | Baxter et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040002470 | Keith et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040012998 | Chien et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040023253 | Kunwar et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040038420 | Gelbart et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040079636 | Hsia et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040106211 | Kauer et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040121354 | Yazawa et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040130377 | Takeda et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040136866 | Pontis et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040146849 | Huang et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040185484 | Costa et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040185591 | Hsiung et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040197803 | Yaku et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040207384 | Brederlow et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040235216 | Rhodes | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040248161 | Rothberg et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050006234 | Hassibi | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050009022 | Weiner et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050017190 | Eversmann et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050031490 | Gumbrecht et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050032075 | Yaku et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050058990 | Guia et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050062093 | Sawada et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050079510 | Berka et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050093072 | Bonges et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050093645 | Watanabe et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050095602 | West et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050100939 | Namsaraev et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050106587 | Klapproth et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050130173 | Leamon et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050142033 | Glezer et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050151181 | Beintner | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050156207 | Yazawa et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050156584 | Feng | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050181440 | Chee et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050189960 | Tajima | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050191698 | Chee et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050202582 | Eversmann et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050206548 | Muramatsu et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050212016 | Brunner et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050221473 | Dubin et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050224346 | Holm-Kennedy | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050230245 | Morgenshtein et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050230271 | Levon et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050233318 | Chee et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050239132 | Klapprith | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050266456 | Williams et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050282224 | Fouillet et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050285155 | Johnson et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060000772 | Sano et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060035400 | Wu et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060040297 | Leamon et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060051807 | Fuller | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060057025 | Eversmann et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060057604 | Chen et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060073513 | Chee et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060134633 | Chen et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060141474 | Miyahara et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060154399 | Sauer et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060166203 | Tooke et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060182664 | Peck et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060197118 | Migliorato et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060199193 | Koo et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060199493 | Hartmann, Jr. et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060205061 | Roukes | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060216812 | Okada et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060219558 | Hafeman et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060228721 | Leamon et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060244147 | Lee et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060246497 | Huang et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060269927 | Lieber | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060289726 | Paulus et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070059741 | Kamahori et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070087362 | Church et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070087401 | Neilson et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070092872 | Rothberg et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070095663 | Chou et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070096164 | Peters et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070099173 | Spira et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070099208 | Drmanac et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070117099 | Engelhardt et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070138132 | Barth | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070172865 | Hardin et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070212681 | Shapiro et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070217963 | Elizarov et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070231824 | Chee et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070233477 | Halowani et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070247170 | Barbaro et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070250274 | Volkov et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070252176 | Shim et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070262363 | Tao et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070278488 | Hirabayashi et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080003142 | Link et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080012007 | Li et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080014589 | Link et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080035494 | Gomez et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080047836 | Strand et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080063566 | Matsumoto et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080077607 | Gatawood et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080085219 | Beebe et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080094074 | Kim et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080096216 | Quake | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080111161 | Sorge et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080115361 | Santini et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080121946 | Youn et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080132693 | Berka et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080136933 | Dosluoglu et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080164917 | Floyd et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080166727 | Esfandyarpour et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080176271 | Silver et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080185616 | Johnson et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080186093 | Forbes | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080204048 | Stasiak et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080205559 | Iida | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080210931 | Truong et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080230386 | Srinivasan et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20090026082 | Rothberg et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090030117 | Lanphere et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090033370 | Sarig et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090048124 | Leamon et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090062132 | Borner | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090075383 | El Gamal et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090079414 | Levon et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090120905 | Kohl et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090121258 | Kumar | May 2009 | A1 |
20090127589 | Rothberg | May 2009 | A1 |
20090127689 | Ye et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090143244 | Bridgham et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090149607 | Karim et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090156425 | Walt et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090170728 | Walt et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090194416 | Hsiung et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090201032 | Burdett et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090273386 | Korobeynikov et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100007326 | Nakazato | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100026814 | Shimoda | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100039146 | Park et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100052765 | Makino | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100133547 | Kunze et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100137143 | Rothberg et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100176463 | Koizumi et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100188073 | Rothberg et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100197507 | Rothberg et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100244106 | Parker et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100273166 | Garcia | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100282617 | Rothberg et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100300895 | Nobile et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100301398 | Rothberg et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110037121 | Lee et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110062972 | Je et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110114827 | Yamaoka et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110165557 | Ah et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110169056 | Wey et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110181253 | Isham et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110217697 | Rothberg et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110230375 | Rothberg et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110236263 | Sawada et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110247933 | Rothberg et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110248320 | Rothberg et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110262903 | Davidson et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110263463 | Rothberg et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110275522 | Rothberg et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110281737 | Rothberg | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110281741 | Rothberg et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110287945 | Rothberg et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110299337 | Parris et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120000274 | Fife | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120001056 | Fife et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120001235 | Fife | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120001236 | Fife et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120001237 | Fife et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120001615 | Levine et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120001646 | Bolander et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120001779 | Fife et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120012900 | Lee et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120013392 | Rothberg et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120022795 | Johnson et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120034607 | Rothberg et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120037961 | Rothberg et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120040844 | Rothberg et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120045368 | Hinz et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120045844 | Rothberg et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120055811 | Rothberg et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120055813 | Rothberg et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120056248 | Fife | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120060587 | Babcock et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120074956 | Fife et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120129703 | Rothberg et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120129728 | Rothberg et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120129732 | Rothberg et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120135870 | Rothberg et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120143531 | Davey et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120154018 | Sugiura | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120161207 | Homyk et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120168307 | Fife | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120168784 | Fife et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120173159 | Davey et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120228136 | Levine | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120247977 | Rothberg et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120249192 | Matsushita et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120261274 | Rearick et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120279859 | Rothberg et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120280285 | Rothberg et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120280286 | Rothberg et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120283146 | Rothberg et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120286332 | Rothberg et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120286333 | Rothberg et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120286771 | Rothberg et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120288853 | Rothberg et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120288976 | Rothberg et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120289413 | Rothberg et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120293158 | Rothberg et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120295795 | Rothberg et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120322054 | Rothberg et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120325683 | Milgrew | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120326213 | Bustillo et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120326767 | Milgrew | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120329043 | Milgrew | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120329044 | Milgrew | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120329192 | Bustillo et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130001653 | Milgrew et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130004949 | Rearick et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130009214 | Bustillo et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130015505 | Rothberg et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130015506 | Rothberg et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130017959 | Rothberg et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130056353 | Nemirovsky et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130105868 | Kalnitsky et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130135018 | Kuo et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130210128 | Rothberg et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130210182 | Rothberg et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130210641 | Rothberg et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130217004 | Rothberg et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130217587 | Rothberg et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130281307 | Li et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130324421 | Rothberg et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130341734 | Merz | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140080717 | Li et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140148345 | Li et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140234981 | Zarkesh-Ha et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140235452 | Rothberg et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140235463 | Rothberg et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140308752 | Chang et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20150097214 | Cheng et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20160178568 | Cheng et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1582334 | Feb 2005 | CN |
1585896 | Feb 2005 | CN |
1703623 | Nov 2005 | CN |
1826525 | Aug 2006 | CN |
101669026 | Mar 2010 | CN |
101676714 | Mar 2010 | CN |
102203282 | Sep 2011 | CN |
102301228 | Dec 2011 | CN |
102484267 | May 2012 | CN |
4232532 | Apr 1994 | DE |
4430811 | Sep 1995 | DE |
19512117 | Oct 1996 | DE |
102004044299 | Mar 2006 | DE |
102008012899 | Sep 2009 | DE |
0223618 | May 1987 | EP |
1243925 | Sep 2002 | EP |
1243925 | Mar 2003 | EP |
1371974 | Dec 2003 | EP |
1432818 | Jun 2004 | EP |
1542009 | Jun 2005 | EP |
1557884 | Jul 2005 | EP |
1669749 | Jun 2006 | EP |
1975246 | Mar 2007 | EP |
1870703 | Dec 2007 | EP |
2307577 | Apr 2011 | EP |
2457851 | Sep 2009 | GB |
2461127 | Dec 2009 | GB |
2461127 | Jul 2010 | GB |
58070155 | Apr 1983 | JP |
62-237349 | Oct 1987 | JP |
02-250331 | Oct 1990 | JP |
02-310931 | Dec 1990 | JP |
H05-080115 | Apr 1993 | JP |
2000055874 | Feb 2000 | JP |
2002-221510 | Aug 2002 | JP |
2002272463 | Sep 2002 | JP |
PCTJP200304697 | Apr 2003 | JP |
2003-279532 | Oct 2003 | JP |
2003-322633 | Nov 2003 | JP |
2004-510125 | Apr 2004 | JP |
2005218310 | Aug 2004 | JP |
2004-271384 | Sep 2004 | JP |
2005077210 | Mar 2005 | JP |
2005077210 | Mar 2005 | JP |
2005-515475 | May 2005 | JP |
2005-518541 | Jun 2005 | JP |
2005518541 | Jun 2005 | JP |
2005-207797 | Aug 2005 | JP |
2006138846 | Jun 2006 | JP |
2006-284225 | Oct 2006 | JP |
2007243003 | Sep 2007 | JP |
2008-215974 | Sep 2008 | JP |
2010513869 | Apr 2010 | JP |
2011-525810 | Sep 2011 | JP |
2011525810 | Sep 2011 | JP |
2012-506557 | Mar 2012 | JP |
2015-506557 | Mar 2012 | JP |
10-0442838 | Jul 2004 | KR |
100442838 | Aug 2004 | KR |
10-0455283 | Oct 2004 | KR |
100455283 | Nov 2004 | KR |
200946904 | Nov 2009 | TW |
8909283 | Oct 1989 | WO |
198909283 | Oct 1989 | WO |
1990005910 | May 1990 | WO |
9813523 | Apr 1998 | WO |
199813523 | Apr 1998 | WO |
1998046797 | Oct 1998 | WO |
199919717 | Apr 1999 | WO |
200120039 | Mar 2001 | WO |
2001020039 | Mar 2001 | WO |
200142498 | Jun 2001 | WO |
2001047804 | Jul 2001 | WO |
01081896 | Nov 2001 | WO |
0181896 | Nov 2001 | WO |
200224322 | Mar 2002 | WO |
02077287 | Oct 2002 | WO |
02086162 | Oct 2002 | WO |
2002077287 | Oct 2002 | WO |
2002086162 | Oct 2002 | WO |
03073088 | Sep 2003 | WO |
2003073088 | Sep 2003 | WO |
2004017068 | Feb 2004 | WO |
2004040291 | May 2004 | WO |
2004048962 | Jun 2004 | WO |
WO-2004081234 | Sep 2004 | WO |
2005015156 | Feb 2005 | WO |
2005022142 | Mar 2005 | WO |
2005043160 | May 2005 | WO |
2005047878 | May 2005 | WO |
2005054431 | Jun 2005 | WO |
2005062049 | Jul 2005 | WO |
2005062049 | Jul 2005 | WO |
2005084367 | Sep 2005 | WO |
2005090961 | Sep 2005 | WO |
2005090961 | Sep 2005 | WO |
2006005967 | Jan 2006 | WO |
2006022370 | Mar 2006 | WO |
2006056226 | Jun 2006 | WO |
2007002204 | Jan 2007 | WO |
2007002204 | Jan 2007 | WO |
2007086935 | Aug 2007 | WO |
2008007716 | Jan 2008 | WO |
2008058282 | May 2008 | WO |
2008076406 | Jun 2008 | WO |
2008076406 | Jun 2008 | WO |
2008107014 | Sep 2008 | WO |
2009012112 | Jan 2009 | WO |
WO-2009014155 | Jan 2009 | WO |
2009041917 | Apr 2009 | WO |
2009074926 | Jun 2009 | WO |
2009081890 | Jul 2009 | WO |
2009158006 | Dec 2009 | WO |
2009158006 | Dec 2009 | WO |
2010008480 | Jan 2010 | WO |
2010008480 | Jan 2010 | WO |
2010047804 | Apr 2010 | WO |
2010047804 | Apr 2010 | WO |
2010138182 | Dec 2010 | WO |
2010138186 | Dec 2010 | WO |
2010138188 | Dec 2010 | WO |
2010138182 | Jan 2011 | WO |
2012003359 | Jan 2012 | WO |
2012003363 | Jan 2012 | WO |
2012003368 | Jan 2012 | WO |
2012003380 | Jan 2012 | WO |
2012006222 | Jan 2012 | WO |
2012046137 | Apr 2012 | WO |
2012152308 | Nov 2012 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Chin, Yuan-Lung et al., “Titanium Nitride Membrane Application to Extended Gate Field Effect Transistor pH Sensor Using VLSI Technology”, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. vol. 40, Part 1, No. 11, Nov. 2001, pp. 6311-6315. |
International Preliminary Amendment on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/US2014/020887 dated Sep. 15, 2015, 8 pages. |
EP09822323.3, “European Extended Search Report”, dated May 27, 2015, 8 pages. |
Lin, B.J. et al., “Practicing the Novolac deep-UV portable conformable masking technique”, Journal of Vacuum Science and Technology, Vo. 19, No. 4, 1981, 1313-1319. |
PCT/US2014/020892, “International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jun. 3, 2014”. |
Van Kerkhof, “The Development of an ISFET based heparin sensor using the ion-step measuring method”, Biosensors and Bioelectronics, vol. 9, Nos. 9-10, 1993, 463-472. |
European Search Report for European Application No. EP10780935 dated Jun. 9, 2015, 5 pages. |
Supplementary European Search Report for European Application No. EP10780935 dated Sep. 30, 2015, 6 pages. |
Ligler, Frances S. et al., “Array biosensor for detection of toxins”, Anal. Bioanal Chem vol. 377, 2003, pp. 469-477. |
Rowe, Chris A. et al., “An Array Immunosensor for Simultaneous Detection of Clinical Analytes”, Anal. Chem. vol. 71, 1999, pp. 433-439. |
European Search Report for European Application No. EP15170247.9 dated Nov. 10, 2015, 4 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/US2014/040923 dated Dec. 15, 2015, 8 pages. |
Matula, Richard A. , “Electrical Resistivity of Copper, Gold, Palladium, and Silver”, Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data, vol. 8.4. 1979, pp. 1147-1298. |
[No Author Listed], , “ISFET Wikipedia article”, 2006, Wikipedia, Last modified Nov. 7, 2006, 2006. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/002,781, , “Methods and apparatus for measuring analytes using large scale FET arrays”, filed Dec. 17, 2007, Publication No. US20090026082. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/474,897, , “Methods and Apparatus for Measuring Analytes”, filed May 29, 2009, Publication number is US20100137143. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/001,182, , “Methods and Apparatus for Measuring Analytes Using Large Scale FET Arrays”, filed May 23, 2011, Publication Number is US20110217697. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/033,147, , “Methods and Apparatus for Measuring Analytes Using Large Scale FET Arrays”, filed Feb. 23, 2011, Publication Number is US20110287945. |
U.S. Appl. No. 60/301,932, , “US Provisional Application”, Assay Plates, Reader Systems and Methods for Luminescence Test Measurements, Jun. 29, 2001, 245 pages. |
Ahmadian, A. et al., “Single-nucleotide polymorphism analysis by pyrosequencing”, Anal. Biochem. vol. 280, 2000, pp. 103-110. |
Akiyama, T et al., “Ion-Sensitive Field-Effect Transistors with Inorganic Gate Oxide for pH Sensing”, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. ED-29(12), 1982, pp. 1936-1941. |
Akiyama, T et al., “Ion-Sensitive Field-Effect Transistors with Inorganic Gate Oxide for pH Sensing”, IEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. EE-20(12), 1982, pp. 1936-1941. |
Anderson, E. et al., “A system for multiplexed direct electrical detection of DNA synthesis”, Sensors and Actuators B Chem., vol. 129, 2008, 79-86. |
AU2011226767, , “Search Information Statement”, Oct. 26, 2011, pp. 1-3. |
Bandiera, L. et al., “A fully electronic sensor for the measurement of cDNA hybridization kinetics”, Biosens Bioelectron, vol. 22, 2007, pp. 2108-2114. |
Barbaro, M et al., “A CMOS, Fully Integrated Sensor for Electronic Detection of DNA Hybridization”, IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 27(7), 2006, pp. 595-597. |
Barbaro, M. et al., “A Charge-Modulated FET for Detection of Biomolecular Processes: Conception, Modeling, and Simulation”, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 53(1), 2006, pp. 158-166. |
Barbaro, M. et al., “Fully electronic DNA hybridization detection by a standard CMOS biochip”, Sensors and Actuators B Chemical, vol. 118, 2006, 41-46. |
Bashford, G. et al., “Automated bead-trapping apparatus and control system for single-molecule DNA sequencing”, Optics Express, vol. 16(5), Mar. 3, 2008, pp. 3445-3455. |
Baumann, W. et al., “Microelectronic sensor system for microphysiological application on living cells”, Sensors Actuators B, vol. 55, 1999, pp. 77-89. |
Bausells, J. et al., “Ion-sensitive field-effect transistors fabricated in a commercial CMOS technology”, Sensors and Actuators B Chemical, vol. 57, 1999, pp. 56-62. |
Beer, et al., “Anion Recognition and Sensing: The State of the Art and Future Perspectives”, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., vol. 40, 2001, pp. 487-516. |
Bergveld, P , “ISFET, Theory and Practice”, IEEE Sensor Conference, Toronto, Oct. 2003, 2003, pp. 1-26. |
Bergveld, P. , “Thirty years of ISFETOLOGY What happened in the past 30 years and what may happen in the next 30 years”, Sensors and Actuators B, vol. 88, 2003, pp. 1-20. |
Besselink, G et al., “ISFET Affinity Sensor”, Methods in Biotechnology, vol. 7: Affinity Biosensors: Techniques and Protocols, 1998, pp. 173-185. |
Bobrov, P. et al., “Chemical sensitivity of an ISFET with Ta2O5 membrane in strong acid and alkaline solutions”, Sensors and Actuators B, vol. 3, 1991, pp. 75-81. |
Bockelmann, U. et al., “Detecting DNA by field effect transistor arrays”, Proceedings of the 2006 IFIP International Conference on Very Large Scale Integration, 2006, 164-168. |
Bousse, L. et al., “A process for the combined fabrication of ion sensors and CMOS circuits”, IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 9(1), 1988, pp. 44-46. |
Bousse, L. et al., “Zeta potential measurements of Ta2O5 and SiO2 thin films”, J. Colloid Interface Sci., vol. 147(1), 1991, pp. 22-32. |
Brenner, et al., “Gene expression analysis by massively parallel signature sequencing (MPSS) on microbead arrays”, Nature Biotechnology, vol. 18, No. 6, Jun. 2000, 630-634. |
Brzozka, Z. et al., “Enhanced performance of potassium CHEMFETs by optimization of a polysiloxane membrane”, Sensors and Actuators B. Chemical, 18-19, 1994, 38-41. |
Chan, Wai P. et al., “An Integrated ISFETs Instrumentation System in Standard CMOS Technology”, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 45, No. 9, Sep. 2010, pp. 1923-1934. |
Chen, Y. et al., “Nanoscale field effect transistor for biomolecular signal amplification”, App Phys Letter, vol. 91, 2007, pp. 243511-1-243511-3. |
Chen, Y. et al., “Silicon-based nanoelectronic field-effect pH sensor with local gate control”, App Phys Letter, vol. 89, 2006, pp. 223512-1-223512-3. |
Chou, J. et al., “Letter to the Editor on Simulation of Ta2O5 gate ISFET temperature characteristics”, Sensors and Actuators B, vol. 80, 2001, pp. 290-291. |
Chou, J. et al., “Simulation of Ta2O5 gate ISFET temperature characteristics”, Sensor and Actuators B, vol. 71, Letter to the Editor, 2000, pp. 73-76. |
Chung, W-Y et al., “ISFET interface circuit embedded with noise rejection capability”, Electronics Letters, vol. 40(18), e-pub; 2 pages, 2004. |
Chung, W-Y et al., “ISFET performance enhancement by using the improved circuit techniques”, Sensors and Actuators B, vol. 113, 2006, pp. 555-562. |
Chung, W-Y et al., “New ISFET interface circuit design with temperature compensation”, Microelectronics Journal, vol. 37(10), Oct. 1, 2006, pp. 1105-1114. |
Chung, W-Y et al., “Temperature compensation electronics for ISFET readout applications”, Biomedical Circuits and Systems, IEEE International Workshop Singapore, Dec. 1, 2004, pp. 305-308. |
CN200780051353.2, , “Second Office Action”, [English Translation of Office Action], dated Mar. 5, 2013, 7 pages. |
CN201080029374.6, , “First Office Action”, English Translation, dated Jan. 6, 2014, 25 pages. |
Cobben, Peter et al., “Transduction of Selective Recognition of Heavy Metal Ions by Chemically Modified Field Effect Transistors (CHEMFETs)”, J. Am. Chem. Soc., vol. 114, No. 26, 1992, 10573-10582. |
Dazhong, Z. et al., “Research of CMOS Biosensor IC for Extracellular Electrophysiological Signal Recording and pH value Measuring”, Solid-State and Integrated-Circuit Technology, 9th International Conference, NJ USA, Oct. 20, 2008, pp. 2557-2560. |
Dorf, Richard C. , “The Electrical Engineering Handbook”, University of California, Davis, CRC Press, 2 edition, Chapter 3—Linear Circuit Analysis, Jun. 25, 2004, pp. 3-1 to 3-66. |
Eijkel, J. et al., “Measuring Donnan-related phenomena using a solid-state ion sensor and a concentration-step method”, J. Membrane Sci., vol. 127, 1997, pp. 203-221. |
Eijkel, J. , “Potentiometric detection and characterization of adsorbed protein using stimulus-response measurement techniques”, Thesis, Sep. 3, 1955, pp. 1-147; 160-192. |
Eltoukhy, H et al., “A 0.18um CMOS 10-6 lux Bioluminescence Detection System-on-Chip”, ISSCC 2004/Session12/Biomicrosystems/12.3, 2004, pp. 1-3. |
Eltoukhy, H. et al., “A. 0.18-um CMOS Bioluminescence Detection Lab-on-Chip”, IEEE J Solid-State Circuits, vol. 41(3), 2006, pp. 651-662. |
EP07867780.4, , “Office Action”, dated Jan. 28, 2014, 7 pages. |
EP09798251.6, , “Extend European Search Report”, dated Aug. 27, 2013, 6 pages. |
EP09798251.6, , “Office Action—Article 94(3)”, dated Apr. 8, 2014, 5 pages. |
EP11801437.2, , “EP Office Action dated Jul. 8, 2014”. |
EP11801437.2, , “European Extended Search Report”, dated Jul. 25, 2013, 10 pages. |
EP11801437.2, , “LT00349EP Examination Notification”, dated Feb. 12, 2015, 8 pages. |
EP11801439.8, , “Extended Search Report”, dated Mar. 7, 2014, 9 pages. |
EP11804218.3, , “European Extended Search Report”, dated Jul. 11, 2013, 3 pages. |
EP11804218.3, , “First Office Action”, dated Jul. 29, 2013, 8 pages. |
EP11827128.7, , “European Search Report”, dated Aug. 1, 2013, 5 pages. |
EP13161312.7, , “Extend European Search Report”, dated Oct. 15, 2013, 8 pages. |
EP13163995.4, , “EP Office Action dated Jul. 9, 2014”. |
EP13163995.7, , “Extend European Search Report”, dated Aug. 20, 2013, 6 pages. |
EP13163995.7, , “Office Action”, dated Aug. 30, 2013, 7 pages. |
EP13164768.7, , “European Search Report”, dated Aug. 20, 2013, 6 pages. |
EP13164768.7, , “Office Action”, dated Aug. 30, 2013, 7 pages. |
EP13174555.6, , “EP Extended Search Report”, dated Dec. 12, 2013, 8 pages. |
EP13174555.6, , “EP Search Report”, dated Nov. 21, 2013, 5 pages. |
EP13177039.8, , “EP Search Report”, dated Nov. 21, 2013, 9 pages. |
EP13177590.0, , “EP Search Report”, dated Nov. 20, 2013, 5 pages. |
EP13177590.0, , “European Examination Notification”, dated Sep. 8, 2014, 9 pages. |
EP14152861.2, , “EP Search Report”, dated Jul. 7, 2014, 5 pages. |
EP7867780.4, , “Examination Report dated Jul. 3, 2012”. |
Eriksson, J. et al., “Pyrosequencing technology at elevated temperature”, Electrophoresis, vol. 25, 2004, pp. 20-27. |
Esfandyarpour, H. et al., “Gate-controlled microfluidic chamber with magnetic bead for DNA sequencing-by-synthesis technology”, Proc 5th Intl Conf Nanochannels, Microchannels, Minnichannels, Puebla, Mexico (Jun. 18-20, 2007), Jun. 18, 2007, pp. 1-5. |
Eversmann, B. et al., “A 128×128 CMOS Biosensor Array for Extracellular Recording of Neural Activity”, IEEE J. Solid-State Circ., vol. 38(12), Dec. 12, 2003, pp. 2306-2317. |
Faramarzpour, N. et al., “CMOS-Based Active Pixel for Low-Light Level Detection: Analysis and Measurements”, IEEE Trans Electron Devices, vol. 54(12), Dec. 2007, pp. 3229-3237. |
Finn, A et al., “Towards an Optimization of FET-Based Bio-Sensors”, European Cells and Materials, vol. 4, Sup 2, 2002, pp. 21-23. |
Fraden, J. , “Handbook of Modern Sensors—Physics, Designs, and Applications . . . ”, 17.3.2 CHEMFET Sensors, 1996, pp. 499-501. |
Fritz, J. et al., “Electronic detection of DNA by its intrinsic molecular charge”, PNAS, vol. 99, No. 22, Oct. 2002, 14142-14146. |
Gardner, J.W. et al., “Enhancing electronic nose performance by sensor selection using a new integer-based genetic algorithm approach”, Science Direct, Sensors and Actuators B, vol. 106, 2005, pp. 114-121. |
GB0811656.8, , “Search and Examination Report”, dated Mar. 12, 2010. |
GB0811656.8, , “Search Report”, dated Sep. 21, 2009. |
GB0811657.6, , “Examination Report”, dated Jun. 30, 2010. |
GB0811657.6, , “Search Report under Section 17”, dated Oct. 26, 2009. |
Gracia, I. et al., “Test Structures for ISFET Chemical Sensors”, Proc IEEE 1992 Intl Conf Microelec Test Struct, vol. 5, 1992, pp. 156-159. |
Hammond, et al., “Performance and system-on-chip integration of an unmodified CMOS ISFET”, Science Direct, Sensors and Actuators vol. 111-112, 2005, pp. 254-258. |
Hammond, P. et al., “A System-on-Chip Digital pH Meter for Use in a Wireless Diagnostic Capsule”, IEEE Transactons on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 52(4), 2005, pp. 687-694. |
Hammond, P. et al., “Design of a Single-Chip pH Sensor Using a Conventional 0.6- μm CMOS Process”, IEEE Sensors Journal, vol. 4(6), 2004, 706-712. |
Hammond, P. et al., “Encapsulation of a liquid-sensing microchip using SU-8 photoresist”, MicoElectronic Engineering, vol. 73-74, 2004, pp. 893-897. |
Hammond, S. et al., “Genomic sequencing and analysis of a Chinese Hamster ovary cell line using Illumina sequencing technology”, BMC Genomics, vol. 12:67, 2011, pp. 1-8. |
Han, Y , “Label-free detection of biomolecules by a field-effect transistor microarray biosensor with bio-functionalized gate surfaces”, Masters Dissertation, 2006, pp. 1-63. |
Han, Y. et al., “Detection of DNA hybridization by a field-effect transistor with covalently attached catcher molecules”, Surface and Interface Analysis, 38:, 2006, 176-181. |
Hanshaw, R. et al., “An indicator displacement system for fluorescent detection of phosphate oxyanions under physiological conditions”, Science Direct, Tetrahedron Letters, vol. 45, Nov. 15, 2004, pp. 8721-8724. |
Hara, H. et al., “Dynamic response of a Ta205-gate pH-sensitive field-effect transistor”, Sensors Actuators B, vol. 32, 1996, pp. 115-119. |
Hermon, Z. et al., “Miniaturized bio-electronic hybrid for chemical sensing applications”, Tech Connect News, Apr. 22, 2008, pp. 1. |
Hideshima, S. et al., “Detection of tumor marker in blood serum using antibody-modified field effect transistor with optimized BSA blocking”, Sensors and Actuations B: Chemical, vol. 161, 2012, pp. 146-150. |
Hijikata, M. et al., “Identification of a Single Nucleotide Polymorphism in the MXA Gene Promoter (T/T at nt-88) Correlated with the Response of Hepatitis C Patients to Interferon”, Intervirology, vol. 43, 2000, pp. 124-127. |
Hizawa, et al., “Sensing Characteristics of Charge Transfer Type pH Sensor by Accumulative Operation”, IEEE Sensors. EXCO, Daegu, Korea, Oct. 22-25, 2006, pp. 144-147. |
Hizawa, T et al., “Fabrication of a two-dimensional pH image sensor using a charge transfer technique”, Sensors and Actuators B Chemical, vol. 117, 2006, 509-515. |
Hizawa, T. et al., “32×32 pH Image Sensors for Real Time Observation of Biochemical Phenomena”, Transducers & Eurosensors '07, 14th Intl. Conf. on Solid-State, Actuators and Microsystems, Lyon, France, Jun. 10-14, 2007, 2007, pp. 1311-1312. |
Ingebrandt, Sven et al., “Label-free detection of DNA using field-effect transistors”, Phys. stat. sol. (a) 203, No. 14, 2006, pp. 3399-3411. |
Jakobson, C. et al., “Low frequency noise and drift in Ion Senstive Field Effect Transistors”, Sensors Actuators B, vol. 68, 2000, pp. 134-139. |
Ji, H. et al., “A CMOS contact imager for locating individual cells”, ISCAS, 2006, pp. 3357-3360. |
Ji, H. et al., “Contact Imaging: Simulation and Experiment”, IEEE Trans Circuits Systems—I: Regular Papers, vol. 54(8), 2007, pp. 1698-1710. |
JP 2012-246414, , “Final Office Action—No English Translation”, dated Jan. 7, 2014, 3 pages. |
JP2012-246413, , “First Office Action”, dated Jun. 28, 2013, 4 pages. |
Kim, D. et al., “An FET-type charger sensor for highly sensitive detection of DNA sequence”, Biosens Bioelectron, vol. 20(1), 2004, pp. 69-74. |
Klein, M. , “Time effects of ion-sensitive field-effect transistors”, Sens Act B, vol. 17, 1989, pp. 203-208. |
Koch, S et al., “Protein detection with a novel ISFET-based zeta potential analyzer”, Biosensors & Bioelectronics, vol. 14, 1999, pp. 413-421. |
Koch, Sabine et al., “Protein Detection With a Novel SFET-based Zeta Potential Analyzer”, Biosensors & Bioelectronics, 14, 1999, 413-421. |
Krause, M. et al., “Extended gate electrode arrays for extracellular signal recordings”, Sensors and Actuators B, vol. 70, 2000, pp. 101-107. |
Kruise, J. et al., “Detection of protein concentrations using a pH-step titration method”, Sensors Actuators B, vol. 44, 1997, pp. 297-303. |
Leamon, J. et al., “A Massively Parallel PicoTiterPlate Based Platform for Discrete Picoliter-Scale Polymerase Chain Reactions”, Electrophoresis, vol. 24, 2003, pp. 3769-3777. |
Leamon, J. et al., “Cramming More Sequencing Reactions onto Microreactor Chips”, Chemical Reviews, vol. 107, 2007, pp. 3367-3376. |
Lee, C-S et al., “Ion-sensitive Field-Effect Transistor for Biological Sensing”, Sensors, vol. 9, 2009, pp. 7111-7131. |
Lee, S. et al., “An Enhanced Glucose Biosensor Using Charge Transfer Techniques”, Biosensors and Bioelectronics, vol. 24, 2008, pp. 650-656. |
Li, et al., “Sequence-Specific Label-Free DNA Sensors Based on Silico Nanowires”, Nano Letters,, vol. 4(2), 2004, pp. 245-247. |
Lohrengel, M. et al., “A new microcell or microreactor for material surface investigations at large current densities”, Electrochimica Acta, vol. 49, 2004, pp. 2863-2870. |
Lui, A. et al., “A Test Chip for ISFET/CMNOS Technology Development”, Proc. of the 1996 IEEE Intl. Conf. on Microelectronic Test Structures, vol. 9, 1996, pp. 123-128. |
Maki, W et al., “Nanowire-transistor based ultra-sensitive DNA methylation detection”, Biosensors & Bioelectronics, 23, 2008, pp. 780-787. |
Margulies, et al., “Genome sequencing in microfabricated high-density picolitre reactors”, Nature, vol. 437 (15), Jul. 31, 2005, 376-380. |
Marshall, A. et al., “DNA chips: an array of possibilities”, Nature Biotechnology, vol. 16, 1998, pp. 27-31. |
Martel, R. et al., “Single-and multi-wall carbon nanotube field-effect transistors”, Applied Physics Letters, vol. 73, No. 17, 1998, 2447-2449. |
Martinoia, S. et al., “A behavioral macromodel of the ISFET in Spice”, Sensors Actuators B, vol. 62, 2000, pp. 182-189. |
Martinoia, S. et al., “Development of ISFET Array-Based Microsystems for Bioelectrochemical measurements of cell populations”, Biosensors & Bioelectronics, vol. 16, 2001, pp. 1043-1050. |
Matsuo, J. et al., “Charge Transfer Type pH Sensor with Super High Sensitivity”, The 14th international conference on solid-state sensors actuators and microsystems, France, Jun. 10-14, 2007, pp. 1881-1884. |
Medoro, G. et al., “A Lab-on-a-Chip for Cell Detection and Manipulation”, IEEE Sensors J, vol. 3(3), 2003, pp. 317-325. |
Meyburg, S. et al., “N-Channel field-effect transistors with floating gates for extracellular recordings”, Biosens Bioelectron, vol. 21(7), 2006, pp. 1037-1044. |
Milgrew, M. et al., “A 16×16 CMOS proton camera array for direct extracellular imaging of hydrogen-ion activity”, IEEE Intl Solid-State Circuits Conf, Session 32:24, 2008, pp. 590-591; 638. |
Milgrew, M. et al., “A large transistor based sensor array chip for direct extracellular imaging”, Sensors and Actuators B Chemical, vol. 111-112, 2005, 347-353. |
Milgrew, M. et al., “Matching the transconductance characteristics of CMOS ESFET arrays by removing trapped charge”, IEEE Trans Electron Devices, vol. 55(4), 2008, pp. 1074-1079. |
Milgrew, M. et al., “Microsensor Array Technology for Direct Extracellular Imaging”, Apr. 5, 2006, pp. 1-23. |
Milgrew, M. et al., “The development of scalable sensor arrays using standard CMOS technology”, Sensors and Actuators B, vol. 103, 2004, 37-42. |
Milgrew, M. et al., “The fabrication of scalable multi-sensor arrays using standard CMOS technology”, 2003 IEEE Custom Integrated Circuits Conference, 2003, pp. 513-516. |
Milgrew, M.J. et al., “The development of scalable sensor arrays using standard CMOS technology”, ScienceDirect, Sensors and Actuators, vol. 103, 2004, pp. 37-42. |
Milgrew, Mark J. et al., “A Proton Camera Array Technology for Direct Extracellular Ion Imaging”, IEEE International Symposium on Industrial Electronics, 2008, 2051-2055. |
Miyahara, Y. et al., “Biochip Using Micromachining Technology”, J. Institute of Electrostatics, Japan, vol. 27(6), 2003, pp. 268-272. |
Miyahara, Y. et al., “Direct Transduction of Primer Extension into Electrical Signal Using Genetic Field Effect Transistor”, Micro Total Analysis Systems 2004, vol. 1, 2004, pp. 303-305. |
Miyahara, Y. et al., “Potentiometric Detection of DNA Molecules Using Field Effect Transistor”, The Japan Society of Applied Physics, No. 3 (Translation included), 2003, pp. 1180, 30A-S2. |
Naidu, M. S. et al., “Introduction to Electrical Engineering”, Chapter 1—Fundamental Concepts of Electricity, McGraw Hill Education (India) Private Limited, 1995, pp. 1-10. |
Neaman, Donald A. , “Electronic Circuit Analysis and Design”, McGraw Hill Higher Education, 2nd edition, Chapter 6—Basic FET Amplifiers, (reference will be uploaded in 2 parts due to size) part 1 of 2, Dec. 1, 2000, pp. 313-345. |
Neaman, Donald A. , “Electronic Circuit Analysis and Design”, McGraw Hill Higher Education, 2nd edition, Chapter 6—Basic FET Amplifiers, (reference will be uploaded in 2 parts due to size) part 2 of 2, Dec. 1, 2000, pp. 346-381. |
Nishiguchi, K. et al., “Si nanowire ion-sensitive field-effect transistors with a shared floating gate”, Applied Physics Letters vol. 94, 2009, pp. 163106-1 to 163106-3. |
Nyren, P. et al., “Enzymatic Method for Continuous Monitoring of Inorganic Pyrophosphate Synthesis”, Analytical Biochemistry, vol. 151, 1985, pp. 504-509. |
Oelbner, W. et al., “Encapsulation of ESFET sensor chips”, Sensors Actuators B, vol. 105, 2005, pp. 104-117. |
Oelbner, W. et al., “Investigation of the dynamic response behaviour of ISFET pH sensors by means of laser Doppler velocimetry (LDV)”, Sensors Actuators B, vol. 26-27, 1995, pp. 345-348. |
Offenhausser, A. et al., “Field-Effect transistor array for monitoring electrical activity from mammalian neurons in culture”, Biosensors & Bioelectronics, vol. 12(8), 1997, pp. 819-826. |
Ohno, Y. et al., “Electrolyte-Gated Graphene Field-Effect Transistors for Detecting pH and Protein Adsorption”, Nano Letters, vol. 9(9), Jul. 28, 2009, pp. 3318-3322. |
Palan, B. et al., “New ISFET sensor interface circuit for biomedical applications”, Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical: International Journal Devoted to Research and Development of Physical and Chemical Transducers, Elsevier S.A. Ch., vol. 57, No. 1-3, 1999, pp. 63-68. |
Park, K-Y et al., “ISFET glucose sensor system with fast recovery characteristics by employing electrolysis”, Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, vol. 83 (1-3), Mar. 15, 2002, pp. 90-97. |
Patolsky, F. et al., “Nanowire-Based Biosensors”, Analyt Chem 1, vol. 78(13), 2006, pp. 4261-4269. |
PCT/JP2005/001987, , “International Search Report”, dated Apr. 5, 2005. |
PCT/JP2005/015522, , “International Preliminary Report on Patentability”, dated Mar. 19, 2007, Jul. 25, 2006. |
PCT/JP2005/015522, , “International Search Report”, (includes English translation), dated Sep. 27, 2005. |
PCT/US/2009/05745, , “International Preliminary Report on Patentability”, dated Apr. 26, 2011, 2009. |
PCT/US/2009/05745, , “International Search Report”, dated Dec. 11, 2009, 2009. |
PCT/US/2009/05745, , “Written Opinion”, dated Dec. 11, 2009, 2009. |
PCT/US10/01547, , “International Search Report”, dated Aug. 5, 2010. |
PCT/US10/01547, , “International Search Report and Written Opinion”, dated Aug. 5, 2010. |
PCT/US2007/025721, , “Declaration of Non-Establishment of International Search Report”, dated Jul. 15, 2008. |
PCT/US2007/025721, , “International Preliminary Report on Patentability”, dated Jun. 16, 2009. |
PCT/US2007/025721, , “Written Opinion”, dated Jun. 16, 2009. |
PCT/US2009/003766, , “International Preliminary Report on Patentability”, dated Jan. 5, 2011. |
PCT/US2009/003766, , “International Search Report”, dated Apr. 8, 2010. |
PCT/US2009/003766, , “Written Opinion”, dated Apr. 8, 2010. |
PCT/US2009/003797, , “International Search Report”, dated Mar. 12, 2010. |
PCT/US2009/003797, , “Written Opinion”, dated Mar. 12, 2010. |
PCT/US2010/001543, , “International Preliminary Report on Patentability”, dated Nov. 29, 2011, pp. 1-8. |
PCT/US2010/001543, , “International Search Report and Written Opinion”, dated Oct. 13, 2010, pp. 1-12. |
PCT/US2010/001553, , “International Preliminary Report on Patentability”, dated Dec. 8, 2011, pp. 1-10. |
PCT/US2010/001553, , “International Search Report”, dated Jul. 28, 2010, pp. 1-2. |
PCT/US2010/001553, , “Written Opinion”, dated Jul. 14, 2010, pp. 1-6. |
PCT/US2010/01547, , “International Preliminary Report on Patentability”, dated Nov. 29, 2011, 2011, pp. 1-8. |
PCT/US2010/048835, , “International Preliminary Report on Patentability”, dated Mar. 19, 2013, 7 pages. |
PCT/US2010/48835, , “International Search Report and Written Opinion”, dated Dec. 16, 2010, 2010, pp. 1-12. |
PCT/US2011/042655, , “International Search Report”, dated Oct. 21, 2011, 2011, pp. 1-2. |
PCT/US2011/042660, , “International Search Report”, dated Nov. 2, 2011. |
PCT/US2011/042665, , “International Search Report”, dated Nov. 2, 2011, Nov. 2, 2011. |
PCT/US2011/042668, , “International Preliminary Report on Patentability”, dated Mar. 26, 2013, 11 pages. |
PCT/US2011/042668, , “International Search Report”, dated Oct. 28, 2011. |
PCT/US2011/042669, , “International Search Report”, dated Jan. 9, 2012, pp. 1-5. |
PCT/US2011/042669, , “Written Opinion”, dated Jan. 9, 2012, pp. 1-5. |
PCT/US2011/042683, , “International Preliminary Report on Patentability”, dated Jun. 4, 2013, 5 pages. |
PCT/US2011/042683, , “International Search Report”, dated Feb. 16, 2012. |
PCT/US2011/042683, , “Written Opinon”, dated Feb. 16, 2012. |
PCT/US2012/058996, , “International Search Report and Written Opinion”, dated Jan. 22, 2013, pp. 1-11. |
PCT/US2012/071471, , “International Preliminary Report on Patentability”, dated Jun. 24, 2014, 8 pages. |
PCT/US2012/071471, , “International Search Report of the International Searching Authority and Written Opinion”, dated Apr. 24, 2013, 14 pages. |
PCT/US2012/071482, , “International Preliminary Amendment”, dated Jun. 24, 2014, 7 pages. |
PCT/US2012/071482, , “International Search Report of the International Searching Authority and Written Opinion”, dated May 23, 2013, 11 pages. |
PCT/US2013/022129, , “International Preliminary Report on Patentability”, dated Jul. 22, 2014, 11 pages. |
PCT/US2013/022129, , “International Search Report of the International Searching Authority and Written Opinion”, dated Aug. 9, 2013, 18 pages. |
PCT/US2013/022140, , “International Preliminary Report on Patentability”, dated Jul. 22, 2014, 9 pages. |
PCT/US2013/022140, , “International Search Report of the International Searching Authority and Written Opinion”, dated May 2, 2013, 15 pages. |
PCT/US2014/020887, , “International Search Report and Written Opinion”, dated May 30, 2014, 12 pages. |
PCT/US2014/020892, , “International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jun. 3, 2014”. |
PCT/US2014/040923, , “International Search Report and Written Opinion”, dated Sep. 1, 2014, 14 pages. |
Poghossian, A. et al., “Functional testing and characterization of ISFETs on wafer level by means of a micro-droplet cell”, Sensors, vol. 6, 2006, pp. 397-404. |
Pollack, J. et al., “Genome-wide analysis of DNA copy-numbe changes using cDNA microarrays”, Nature Genetics, Nature America Inc., vol. 23, Sep. 1999, pp. 41-46. |
Pourmand, N et al., “Direct electrical detection of DNA synthesis”, PNAS, vol. 103(17), 2006, pp. 6466-6470. |
Pouthas, F. et al., “Spatially resolved electronic detection of biopolymers”, Phys Rev, vol. 70, 2004, pp. 031906-1-031906-8. |
Premanode, B. et al., “A composite ISFED readout circuit employing current feedback”, Sensors Actuators B, vol. 127, 2007, pp. 486-490. |
Premanode, B. et al., “A novel, low power biosensor for real time monitoring of creatine and urea in peritoneal dialysis”, Sensors Actuators B, vol. 120, 2007, pp. 732-735. |
Premanode, B. et al., “Drift Reduction in Ion-Sensitive FETs using correlated double sampling”, Electronics Letters, IEEE Stevenage, GB, vol. 43, No. 16, Aug. 2, 2007, Aug. 2, 2007. |
Premanode, B. et al., “Ultra-low power precision ISFET readout using global current feedback”, Electronic Lett, vol. 42(22), 2006, 2 pages. |
Purushothaman, S. et al., “Protons and single nucleotide polymorphism detection: A simple use for the Ion Sensitive Field Effect Transistor”, Sensors and Actuators B Chemical, vol. 114(2), 2006, pp. 964-968. |
Purushothaman, S. et al., “Towards Fast Solid State DNA Sequencing”, IEEE ISCAS 2002 Proceeding, Circuits and Systems, vol. 4, 2002, pp. IV-169-IV-172. |
Rodriguez-Villegas, E. , “Solution to trapped charge in FGMOS transistors”, Electronics Letters, vol. 39(19), 2003. |
Ronaghi, M. et al., “A Sequencing Method Based on Real-Time Pyrophosphate”, Science, vol. 281, 1998, 363-365. |
Rothberg, J. et al., “An integrated semiconductor device enabling non-optical genome sequencing”, Nature, vol. 475, No. 7356, Jul. 21, 2011, pp. 348-352. |
Sakata, T. et al., “Cell-based field effect devices fo cell adhesion analysis”, Intl. Conf. on Microtechnologies in Medicine and Biology, May 9-12, 2006, Okinawa, Japan, 2006, pp. 177-179. |
Sakata, T. et al., “Detection of DNA recognition events using multi-well field effect transistor”, Biosensors and Bioelectronics vol. 21, 2005, pp. 827-832. |
Sakata, T. et al., “Detection sensitivity of genetic field effect transistor combined with charged nanoparticle-DNA conjugate”, Proc. of 2006 Intl. Conf. on Microtechnologies in Medicine and Biology, May 9-12, 2005, Okinawa, Japan, 2006, pp. 97-100. |
Sakata, T. et al., “Direct detection of single nucleotide polymorphism using genetic field effect transistor”, Digest of Papers Microprocesses and Nanotechnology 2004, Osaka, Japan, 2004 International Microprocesses and Nanotechnology Conference, 2004, pp. 226-227. |
Sakata, T. et al., “Direct Detection of Single-Base Extension Reaction Using Genetic Field Effect Transistor”, Proc. of 3rd Ann. Intl. IEEE EMBS Special Topic Conf. on Microtechnologies in Medicine and Biology, Kahuku, Oahu, HI, May 12-15, 2005, 2005, pp. 219-222. |
Sakata, T. et al., “Direct transduction of allele-specific primer extension into electrical signal using genetic field effect transistor”, Biosensors and Bioelectronics, vol. 22, 2007, pp. 1311-1316. |
Sakata, T. et al., “DNA Analysis Chip Based on Field-Effect Transistors”, Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 44(4B), 2005, pp. 2854-2859. |
Sakata, T. et al., “DNA Sequencing Based on Intrinsic Molecular Charges”, Angewandte Chemie International Edition 2006, vol. 118, 2006, pp. 2283-2286. |
Sakata, T. et al., “DNA Sequencing Based on Intrinsic Molecular Charges”, Angewandte Chemie International Edition 2006, vol. 45, 2006, pp. 2225-2228. |
Sakata, T. et al., “DNA Sequencing Using Genetic Field Effect Transistor”, 13th Intl. Conf. on Solid-State Sensors, Actuators and Microsystems, Jun. 5-9, 2005, Seoul, Korea, 2005, pp. 1676-1679. |
Sakata, T. et al., “Immobilization of oligonucleotide probes on Si3N4 surface and its application to genetic field effect transistor”, Materials Science and Engineering: C, vol. 24, 2004, pp. 827-832. |
Sakata, T. et al., “Potential Behavior of Biochemically Modified Gold Electrode for Extended-Gate Field-Effect Transistor”, Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 44(4B), 2005, pp. 2860-2863. |
Sakata, T. et al., “Potential Response of Genetic Field Effect Transistor to Charged Nanoparticle-DNA Conjugate”, Digest of Papers Microprocesses and Nanotechnology 2005, Tokyo, Japan, 2005 Intl Microprocesses and Nanotech Conference, Hotel Bellclassic, 2005, pp. 42-43. |
Sakata, T. et al., “Potentiometric Detection of Allele Specific Oligonucleotide Hybridization Using Genetic Field Effect Transistor”, Micro Total Analysis Systems 2004, 8th Intl. Conf. on Miniaturized Systems for Chemistry and Life Sciences, Sep. 26-30, 2004, Malmo, Sweden, 2004, pp. 300-302. |
Sakata, T. et al., “Potentiometric Detection of DNA Molecules Hybridization Using Gene Field Effect Transistor and Intercalator”, Materials Research Society Symposium Proceedings, vol. 782, Micro- and Nanosystems, Dec. 1-3, 2003, Boston, Massachusetts, 2004, pp. 393-398. |
Sakata, T. et al., “Potentiometric Detection of DNA Using Genetic Transistor”, Denki Gakkai Kenkyukai Shiryo Chemical Sensor Kenkyukai, CHS-03-51-55, 2003, pp. 1-5. |
Sakata, T. et al., “Potentiometric Detection of Single Nucleotide Polymorphism by Using a Genetic Field-effect transistor”, ChemBioChem, vol. 6, 2005, pp. 703-710. |
Sakurai, T. et al., “Real-Time Monitoring of DNA Polymerase Reactions by a Micro ISFET pH Sensor”, Anal Chem, vol. 64(17), 1992, pp. 1996-1997. |
Salama, K. , “CMOS luminescence detection lab-on-chip: modeling, design, and characterization”, Thesis, Presented at Stanford University, 2005, pp. ii-78. |
Salama, K. , “Modeling and simulation of luminescence detection platforms”, Biosensors & Bioelectronics, 2004, pp. 1377-1386. |
Sawada, K. et al., “A novel fused sensor for photo- and ion-sensing”, Sensors Actuators B, vol. 106, 2005, pp. 614-618. |
Sawada, K. et al., “Highly sensitive ion sensors using charge transfer technique”, Sensors Actuators B, vol. 98, 2004, pp. 69-72. |
Schasfoort, R. et al., “A new approach to immunoFET operation”, Biosensors & Bioelectronics, vol. 5, 1990, pp. 103-124. |
Schasfoort, R. et al., “Field-effect flow control for microfabricated fluidic networks”, Science, vol. 286(5441), 1999, pp. 942-945. |
Schoning, M. et al., “Bio FEDs (Field-Effect Devices): State-of-the-Art and New Directions”, Electroanalysis, vol. 18(19-20), 2006, pp. 1893-1900. |
Schoning, Michael et al., “Recent advances in biologically sensitive field-effect transistors (BioFETs)”, Analyst, vol. 127(9), 2002, pp. 1137-1151. |
Seong-Jin, K. et al., “Label-Free CMOS DNA Quantification With On-Chip Noise Reduction Schemes”, Solid-State Sensors, Actuators and Microsystems Conference, IEEE, Jun. 10, 2013, pp. 947-950. |
SG200903992-6, , “Search and Examination Report (Favourable) dated Jan. 20, 2011”, 12. |
Shah, N. , “Microfabrication of a parellel-array DNA pyrosequencing chip”, NNIN REU Research Accomplishments, 2005, pp. 130-131. |
Shepherd, L et al., “Towards Direct Biochemical Analysis with Weak Inversion ISFETS”, IEEE International Workshop on Biomedical Circuits & Systems, 2004, pp. S1.5-5-S1.5.8. |
Shepherd, L. et al., “A biochemical translinear principle with weak inversion ISFETs”, IEEE Trans Circuits Syst—I, vol. 52(12), Dec. 2005, pp. 2614-2619. |
Shepherd, L. et al., “A novel voltage-clamped CMOS ISFET sensor interface”, IEEE 2007, pp. 3331-3334. |
Shepherd, L. et al., “Towards direct biochemical analysis with weak inversion ISFETS”, Intl Workshop on Biomedical . . . , 2004, S1.5-5-S1.5-8. |
Shepherd, L. et al., “Weak inversion ISFETs for ultra-low power biochemical sensing and real-time analysis”, Sensors Actuators B, vol. 107, 2005, pp. 468-473. |
Shi, Y. et al., “Radical Capillary Array Electrophoresis Microplace and Scanner for High-Performance Nucleic Acid Analysis”, Anal. Chem., vol. 71(23), 1999, pp. 5354-5361. |
Sia, S et al., “Microfluidic devices fabricated in poly(dimethylsiloxane) for biological studies”, Electrophoresis, 24:, 2003, 3563-3576. |
Sibbald, A. et al., “A miniature flowthrough cell with a four-function ChemFET integrated circuit for simultaneous measurements of potassium, hydrogen, calcium and sodium ions”, Analytica chimica acta., 159, 1984, 47-62. |
Simonian, A. L. et al., “FET based biosensors for the direct detection of organophosphate neurotoxins”, Electroanalysis, vol. 16(22), 2004, pp. 1896-1906. |
Souteyrand, E. et al., “Direct detection of the hybridization of synthetic homo-oligomer DNA sequences by field effect”, J Phys Chem B, vol. 101(15), 1997, pp. 2980-2985. |
Starodub, N. et al., “Immunosensor for the determination of the herbicide simazine based on an ion-selective field-effect transistor”, Analytica Chimica Acta, vol. 424, 2000, pp. 37-43. |
Takenaka, S. et al., “DNA Sensing on a DNA Probe-Modified Electrode Using Ferrocenylnaphthalene Dimide as the Electrochemically Active Ligand”, Anal. Chem., vol. 72(6), 2000, pp. 1334-1341. |
Tokuda, T. et al., “A CMOS image sensor with optical and potential dual imaging function for on-chip bioscientific applications”, Sensors and Actuators A, vol. 125, No. 2, 2006, 273-280. |
Tomaszewski, D. et al., “Electrical characterization of ISFETs”, J Telecomm Info Technol, Mar. 2007, pp. 55-60. |
Toumazou, C. et al., “Using transistors to linearase biochemistry”, Electronics Letters, vol. 43(2), Jan. 18, 2007, 3 pages. |
Truman, P. , “Monitoring liquid transport and chemical composition in lab on . . . ”, Lab on a Chip, vol. 6, 2006, pp. 1220-1228. |
Unger, M et al., “Monolithic Microfabricated Valves and Pumps by Multilayer Soft Lithography”, Science, 288:, 2000, 113-116. |
Uslu, F. et al., “Labelfree fully electronic nucleic acid detection system based on a field-effect transistor device”, Biosens & Bioelectron, vol. 19(12), 2004, pp. 1723-1731. |
Van Der Schoot, Bart et al., “The Use of a Multi-ISFET Sensor Fabricated in a Single Substrate”, Letter to the Editors, Sensors and Actuators, vol. 12, 1987, pp. 463-468. |
Van Der Wouden, E. et al., “Directional flow induced by synchronized longitudinal and zeta-potential controlling AC-electrical fields”, Lab Chip, vol. 6(10), 2006, pp. 1300-1305. |
Van Der Wouden, E.J. et al., “Directional flow induced by synchronized longitudinal and zeta . . . ”, www.rsc.og/loc, 2006, 1300-1305. |
Van Hal, R.E.G. et al., “A general model to describe the electrostatic potential at electrolyte oxide interfaces”, Advances in Colloid and Interface Science, vol. 69, 1996, pp. 31-62. |
Van Kerkhof, J et al., “The ISFET based heparin sensor with a monolayer of protamine as affinity ligand”, Biosensors & Bioelectronics, vol. 10(3), 1995, pp. 269-282. |
Van Kerkhof, J. et al., “ISFET Responses on a stepwise change in electrolyte concentration at constant pH”, Sensors Actuators B: Chemical, vol. 18-19, 1994, pp. 56-59. |
Van Kerkhof, J. , “The Development of an ISFET-based Heparin Sensor”, Thesis, 1994. |
Vardalas, John , “Twists and Turns in the Development of the Transistor”, IEEE-USA Today's Engineer Online, May 2003, 6 pages. |
Voigt, H. et al., “Diamond-like carbon-gate pH-ISFET”, Sensors and Actuators B., vol. 44, 1997, pp. 441-445. |
Wagner, T et al., “‘All-in-one’ solid-state device based on a light-addressable potentiometric sensor platform”, Sensors and Actuators B, vol. 117, 2006, pp. 472-479. |
Wang, W. et al., “Label-free detection of small-molecule-protein interactions by using nanowire nanosensors”, Proc. of the Natl. Acad.of Sciences (PNAS), vol. 102(9), 2005, pp. 3208-3212. |
Wilhelm, D. et al., “pH Sensor Based on Differential Measurements on One pH-FET Chip”, Sensors and Actuators B, vol. 4, 1991, pp. 145-149. |
Woias, P , “Modelling the short time response of ISFET sensors”,Sensors and Actuators B, vol. 24-25, 1995, pp. 211-217. |
Woias, P. et al., “Slow pH response effects of silicon nitride ISFET sensors”, Sensors and Actuators B, vol. 48, 1998, pp. 501-504. |
Wood, et al., “Base composition-independent hybridization in tetramethylammonium chloride: a method for oligonucleotide screening of highly complex gene libraries”, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 82, 1985, 1585-1588. |
Wu, P. et al., “DNA and protein microarray printing on silicon nitride waveguide surfaces”, Biosensens Bioelectron, vol. 21(7), 2006, pp. 1252-1263. |
Xu, J-J et al., “Analytical Aspects of FET-Based Biosensors”, Frontiers in Bioscience, vol. 10, 2005, pp. 420-430. |
Yeow, T.C.W. et al., “A very large integrated pH-ISFET sensor array chip compatible with standard CMOS processes”, Sensor and Actuators B, vol. 44, 1997, 434-440. |
Yuqing, M. et al., “Ion sensitive field effect trnasducer-based biosensors”, Biotechnology Advances, vol. 21, 2003, pp. 527-534. |
Zhang, X. et al., “32-Channel Full Customized CMOS Biosensor Chip for Extracellular neural Signal Recording”, Proc. of the 2nd Intl. IEEE EMBs Conf. on Neural Engineering, Arlington, Virginia, 2005, pp. v-viii. |
Zhao, B. et al., “Floating-Gate Ion Sensitive Field-Effect Transistor for Chemical and Biological Sensing”, MRS Proceedings, vol. 828, 2005, pp. 349-354. |
Zhou, G. et al., “Quantitative detection of single nucleotide polymorphisms for a pooled sample by a bioluminometric assay coupled with modified primer extension reactions (BAMPER)”, Nuc. Acids Res., vol. 29(19), e93, 2001, pp. 1-11. |
European Search Report for European Application No. EP10780930 dated Jun. 15, 2015, 3 pages. |
European Search Report for European Application No. EP10857377 dated Jun. 26, 2015, 3 pages. |
Temes, G.C. et al., “A Tutorial Discussion of the Oversampling Method for A/D and D/A Conversion”, 1990 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems, vol. 2 of 4, 1990, 5 pages. |
Thewes, R. et al., “CMOS-based Biosencor Arrays”, Proceedings of the Design, Automation and Test in Euroge Conference and Exhibition, 2005, 2 pages. |
Yoshida, Shoji et al., “Development of a Wide Range pH Sensor based on Electrolyte-Insulator-Semiconductor Structure with Corrosion-Resistant Al2O3—Ta2O5 and Al2O3—ZrO2”, Journal of the Electrochemical Society vol. 151(3), 2004, pp. H53-H58. |
0V5640 Datasheet Product Specification, ¼″ color CMOS QSXGA (5 megapixel) image sensor with OmniBSI technology, May 1, 2011, p. 1, line 9 and pp. 2-7, paragraph 1. |
Izuru, Shinmura, “Kojien”, published by Owanami, Fourth Edition, 1991, 2683. |
Liu, Yan et al., “An ISFET based sensing array with sensor offset compensation and pH sensitivity enhancement”, Proc. of 2010 IEEE Int. Symp. on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS), ISBN:978-1-4244-5308-5, Jun. 2, 2010, pp. 2283-2286. |
Morgenshtein, Arkadiy et al., “Wheatstone-Bridge readout interface for ISFET/REFET applications”, Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, vol. 98, No. 1, Mar. 2004, pp. 18-27. |
Moriizumi, Toyosaka, “Biosensors”, Oyo Buturi (monthly publication of the Japan Society of Applied Physics), vol. 54, No. 2, Feb. 10, 1985, pp. 98-114. |
Nakazato, Kazuo , “An Integrated ISFET Sensor Array”, Sensors, vol. 9, No. 11, 2009, 8831-8851. |
Nakazato, Kazuro et al., “28p-Y-7 ISFET sensor array integrated circuits based on the standard CMOS process”, The 55th annual meeting of the Japan Society of Applied Physics, book of Abstracts, ISBN:978-4-903968-44-5, Mar. 27, 2008, p. 70. |
Nakazato, Kazuro, “An Integrated ISFET Sensor Array”, Sensors, Nov. 2009, vol. 9, No. 11, ISSN:1424-8220, [online], Internet, URL, http://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/9/11/8831/pdf, Nov. 2009, pp. 8831-8851. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for International Application No. PCT/US2015/066052 dated Apr. 7, 2016, 19 pages. |
Wen-Yaw, Chung A. et al., “New ISFET interface circuit design with temperature Compensation” CiteSeerx—URL: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.95.2321&rep=rep1&type=pdf, Jan. 2006. |
“0V5640 Datasheet Product Specification”, ¼″ color CMOS QSXGA (5 megapixel) image sensor with OmniBSI technology, May 1, 2011, p. 1, line 9 and pp. 2-7, paragraph 1. |
Izuru, Shinmura , “Kojien”, published by Owanami, Fourth Edition, 1991, p. 2683. |
Moriizumi, Toyosaka , “Biosensors”, Oyo Buturi (monthly publication of The Japan Society of Applied Physics), vol. 54, No. 2, Feb. 10, 1985, pp. 98-114. |
Nakazato, Kazuo, “An Integrated ISFET Sensor Array”, Sensors, vol. 9, No. 11, 2009, 8831-8851. |
Nakazato, Kazuro et al., “28p-Y-7 ISFET sensor array integrated circuits based on CMOS process”, The 55th annual meeting of the Japan Society of Applied Physics, Abstracts, ISBN:978-4-903968-44-5, Mar. 27, 2008, p. 70. |
PCT/US2015/066052, “International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority” dated Apr. 7, 2016, 19 pages. |
Wen-Yaw, Chung A. et al., “New ISFET interface circuit design with temperature Compensation”, CiteSeerx—URL: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.95.2321&rep=rep1&type=pdf, 2006, 1 page. |
Eastman Kodak Company, “Image Sensor Solutions-Full-Frame CCD Image Sensor Performance Specification”, www.physics.csbsju.edu/370/photometry/manuals/kaf-1001e.pdf, Feb. 19, 2001. |
EP17167536.6, European Search Report, dated Nov. 7, 2017, 1-13. |
PCT/US2015/066052, International Preliminary Reporrt on Patentability dated Jun. 29, 2017, 1-16. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150064829 A1 | Mar 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13801002 | Mar 2013 | US |
Child | 14543551 | US |