The present disclosure relates to sensors for chemical analysis, and to methods for manufacturing such sensors.
A variety of types of chemical sensors have been used in the detection of chemical processes. One type is a chemically-sensitive field effect transistor (chemFET). A chemFET includes a source and a drain separated by a channel region, and a chemically sensitive area coupled to the channel region. The operation of the chemFET is based on the modulation of channel conductance, caused by changes in charge at the sensitive area due to a chemical reaction occurring nearby. The modulation of the channel conductance changes the threshold voltage of the chemFET, which can be measured to detect and/or determine characteristics of the chemical reaction. The threshold voltage may for example be measured by applying appropriate bias voltages to the source and drain, and measuring a resulting current flowing through the chemFET. As another example, the threshold voltage may be measured by driving a known current through the chemFET, and measuring a resulting voltage at the source or drain.
An ion-sensitive field effect transistor (ISFET) is a type of chemFET that includes an ion-sensitive layer at the sensitive area. The presence of ions in an analyte solution alters the surface potential at the interface between the ion-sensitive layer and the analyte solution, due to the protonation or deprotonation of surface charge groups caused by the ions present in the analyte solution. The change in surface potential at the sensitive area of the ISFET affects the threshold voltage of the device, which can be measured to indicate the presence and/or concentration of ions within the solution.
Arrays of ISFETs may be used for monitoring chemical reactions, such as DNA sequencing reactions, based on the detection of ions present, generated, or used during the reactions. See, for example, U.S. Pat. No. 7,948,015 to Rothberg et al., which is incorporated by reference herein. More generally, large arrays of chemFETs or other types of chemical sensors may be employed to detect and measure static and/or dynamic amounts or concentrations of a variety of analytes (e.g. hydrogen ions, other ions, compounds, etc.) in a variety of processes. The processes may for example be biological or chemical reactions, cell or tissue cultures or monitoring neural activity, nucleic acid sequencing, etc.
An issue that arises in the operation of large scale chemical sensor arrays is the susceptibility of the sensor output signals to noise. Specifically, the noise affects the accuracy of the downstream signal processing used to determine the characteristics of the chemical and/or biological process being detected by the sensors. In addition, chemical sensor performance variation across the array results in undesirable differences in the sensor output signals, which further complicates the downstream signal processing.
It is therefore desirable to provide devices including low noise chemical sensors, and methods for manufacturing such devices.
In one embodiment, a chemical sensor is described. The chemical sensor includes a chemically-sensitive field effect transistor including a floating gate conductor having an upper surface. A material defines an opening extending to the upper surface of the floating gate conductor, the material comprising a first dielectric underlying a second dielectric. A conductive element contacts the upper surface of the floating gate conductor and extending a distance along a sidewall of the opening, the distance defined by a thickness of the first dielectric.
In another embodiment, a method for manufacturing a chemical sensor is described. The method includes forming a chemically-sensitive field effect transistor including a floating gate conductor having an upper surface. The method further includes forming a material defining an opening extending to the upper surface of the floating gate conductor, the material comprising a first dielectric underlying a second dielectric. The method further includes forming a conductive element contacting the upper surface of the floating gate conductor and extending a distance along a sidewall of the opening, the distance defined by a thickness of the first dielectric.
Particular aspects of one more embodiments of the subject matter described in this specification are set forth in the drawings and the description below. Other features, aspects, and advantages of the subject matter will become apparent from the description, the drawings, and the claims.
A chemical detection device is described that includes low noise chemical sensors, such as chemically-sensitive field effect transistors (chemFETs), for detecting chemical reactions within overlying, operationally associated reaction regions.
Reducing the plan or top view area (or footprint) of individual chemical sensors and the overlying reaction regions allows for higher density devices. However, as the dimensions of the chemical sensors are reduced, Applicants have found that a corresponding reduction in the sensing surface area of the sensors can significantly impact performance.
For example, for chemical sensors having sensing surfaces defined at the bottom of the reaction regions, reducing the plan view dimensions (e.g. the width or diameter) of the reaction regions results in a similar reduction in the sensing surface areas. Applicants have found that as the sensing surface area is reduced to technology limits, fluidic noise due to the random fluctuation of charge on the sensing surface contributes to an increasing proportion of the total variation in sensing surface potential. This can significantly reduce the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the sensor output signal, which affects the accuracy of the downstream signal processing used to determine the characteristics of the chemical and/or biological process being detected by the sensor.
Chemical sensors described herein have sensing surface areas which are not limited to a two-dimensional area at the bottom of the reaction regions. In embodiments described herein, the sensing surface of the chemical sensor includes a generally horizontal portion along the bottom surface of the reaction region, as well as a generally vertical portion extending along a sidewall of an opening containing the reaction region.
The distance that the generally vertical portion extends along the sidewall is defined by the thickness of a dielectric material that forms a lower portion of the opening. The dielectric material can be deposited using a process (e.g. thin film deposition) which results in very small thickness variation across the array. In doing so, the sensor surface areas of the chemical sensors can be very well controlled, resulting in uniform chemical sensor performance across the array and thus simplifying the downstream signal processing.
By extending the sensing surface in the generally vertical direction, the chemical sensor can have a small footprint, while also having a sufficiently large sensing surface area to avoid the noise issues associated with small sensing surfaces. The footprint of a chemical sensor is determined in part by the width (e.g. diameter) of the overlying reaction region and can be made small, allowing for a high density array. In addition, because the sensing surface extends a controlled distance up the sidewall, the sensing surface area can be relatively large. As a result, low noise chemical sensors can be provided in a high density array, such that the characteristics of reactions can be accurately detected.
The reference electrode 108 may be of any suitable type or shape, including a concentric cylinder with a fluid passage or a wire inserted into a lumen of passage 111. The reagents 114 may be driven through the fluid pathways, valves, and flow cell 101 by pumps, gas pressure, or other suitable methods, and may be discarded into the waste container 106 after exiting the outlet 103 of the flow cell 101. The fluidics controller 118 may control driving forces for the reagents 114 and the operation of valve 112 and valve block 116 with suitable software.
The microwell array 107 includes reaction regions, also referred to herein as microwells, which are operationally associated with corresponding chemical sensors in the sensor array. For example, each reaction region may be coupled to a chemical sensor suitable for detecting an analyte or reaction property of interest within that reaction region. The microwell array 107 may be integrated in the integrated circuit device 100, so that the microwell array 107 and the sensor array are part of a single device or chip.
The flow cell 101 may have a variety of configurations for controlling the path and flow rate of reagents 114 over the microwell array 107. The array controller 124 provides bias voltages and timing and control signals to the integrated circuit device 100 for reading the chemical sensors of the sensor array. The array controller 124 also provides a reference bias voltage to the reference electrode 108 to bias the reagents 114 flowing over the microwell array 107.
During an experiment, the array controller 124 collects and processes output signals from the chemical sensors of the sensor array through output ports on the integrated circuit device 100 via bus 127. The array controller 124 may be a computer or other computing means. The array controller 124 may include memory for storage of data and software applications, a processor for accessing data and executing applications, and components that facilitate communication with the various components of the system in
In the illustrated embodiment, the array controller 124 is external to the integrated circuit device 100. In some alternative embodiments, some or all of the functions performed by the array controller 124 are carried out by a controller or other data processor on the integrated circuit device 100.
The values of the output signals from the chemical sensors indicate physical and/or chemical parameters of one or more reactions taking place in the corresponding reaction regions in the microwell array 107. For example, in an exemplary embodiment, the values of the output signals may be processed using the techniques disclosed in Rearick et al., U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/339,846, filed Dec. 29, 2011, based on U.S. Prov. Pat. Appl. Nos. 61/428,743, filed Dec. 30, 2010, and 61/429,328, filed Jan. 3, 2011, and in Hubbell, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/339,753, filed Dec. 29, 2011, based on U.S. Prov. Pat. Appl. No. 61/428,097, filed Dec. 29, 2010, each of which are incorporated by reference herein.
The user interface 128 may display information about the flow cell 101 and the output signals received from chemical sensors in the sensor array on the integrated circuit device 100. The user interface 128 may also display instrument settings and controls, and allow a user to enter or set instrument settings and controls.
The fluidics controller 118 may control delivery of the individual reagents 114 to the flow cell 101 and integrated circuit device 100 in a predetermined sequence, for predetermined durations, at predetermined flow rates. The array controller 124 can then collect and analyze the output signals of the chemical sensors indicating chemical reactions occurring in response to the delivery of the reagents 114.
During the experiment, the system may also monitor and control the temperature of the integrated circuit device 100, so that reactions take place and measurements are made at a known predetermined temperature.
The system may be configured to let a single fluid or reagent contact the reference electrode 108 throughout an entire multi-step reaction during operation. The valve 112 may be shut to prevent any wash solution 110 from flowing into passage 109 as the reagents 114 are flowing. Although the flow of wash solution may be stopped, there may still be uninterrupted fluid and electrical communication between the reference electrode 108, passage 109, and the microwell array 107. The distance between the reference electrode 108 and the junction between passages 109 and 111 may be selected so that little or no amount of the reagents flowing in passage 109 and possibly diffusing into passage 111 reach the reference electrode 108. In an exemplary embodiment, the wash solution 110 may be selected as being in continuous contact with the reference electrode 108, which may be especially useful for multi-step reactions using frequent wash steps.
The chemical sensors of the sensor array 205 are responsive to (and generate output signals related to) chemical reactions within associated reaction regions in the microwell array 107 to detect an analyte or reaction property of interest. The chemical sensors of the sensor array 205 may for example be chemically sensitive field-effect transistors (chemFETs), such as ion-sensitive field effect transistors (ISFETs). Examples of chemical sensors and array configurations that may be used in embodiments are described in U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2010/0300559, No. 2010/0197507, No. 2010/0301398, No. 2010/0300895, No. 2010/0137143, and No. 2009/0026082, and U.S. Pat. No. 7,575,865, each which are incorporated by reference herein.
Chemical sensor 350 is coupled to corresponding reaction region 301, and chemical sensor 351 is coupled to corresponding reaction region 302. Chemical sensor 350 is representative of the chemical sensors in the sensor array. In the illustrated example, the chemical sensor 350 is a chemically-sensitive field effect transistor (chemFET), more specifically an ion-sensitive field effect transistor (ISFET) in this example.
The chemical sensor 350 includes a floating gate structure 318 having a sensor plate 320 coupled to the reaction region 301 by an electrically conductive element 370. As can be seen in
The chemical sensor 350 also includes a source region 321 and a drain region 322 within a semiconductor substrate 354. The source region 321 and the drain region 322 comprise doped semiconductor material have a conductivity type different from the conductivity type of the substrate 354. For example, the source region 321 and the drain region 322 may comprise doped P-type semiconductor material, and the substrate may comprise doped N-type semiconductor material.
Channel region 323 separates the source region 321 and the drain region 322. The floating gate structure 318 overlies the channel region 323, and is separated from the substrate 354 by a gate dielectric 352. The gate dielectric 352 may be for example silicon dioxide. Alternatively, other dielectrics may be used for the gate dielectric 352.
As shown in
The opening includes a lower portion 314 within dielectric material 308 and proximate to the sensor plate 320. The opening also includes an upper portion 315 within the dielectric material 310 and extending from the lower portion 314 to the upper surface of the dielectric material 310. In the illustrated embodiment, the width of the upper portion 315 of the opening is greater than the width of the lower portion 314 of the opening.
The opening may for example have a circular cross-section. Alternatively, the opening may be non-circular. For example, the cross-section may be square, rectangular, hexagonal, or irregularly shaped. The dimensions of the openings, and their pitch, can vary from embodiment to embodiment. In some embodiments, the openings can have a characteristic diameter, defined as the square root of 4 times the plan view cross-sectional area (A) divided by Pi (e.g., sqrt(4*A/π)), of not greater than 5 micrometers, such as not greater than 3.5 micrometers, not greater than 2.0 micrometers, not greater than 1.6 micrometers, not greater than 1.0 micrometers, not greater than 0.8 micrometers, not greater than 0.6 micrometers, not greater than 0.4 micrometers, not greater than 0.2 micrometers or even not greater than 0.1 micrometers.
The lower portion 314 of the opening includes the electrically conductive element 370 on the sidewall 303 of the dielectric material 308. In the illustrated embodiment, the inner surface 371 of the electrically conductive element 370 defines a lower segment of the reaction region 301. That is, there is no intervening deposited material layer between the inner surface 371 of the electrically conductive element 370 and the reaction region 301 for the chemical sensor 350. As a result of this structure, the inner surface 371 of the electrically conductive element 370 is cup-shaped and acts as the sensing surface for the chemical sensor 350.
The electrically conductive element 370 is a conformal layer of material within the lower portion 314 of the opening, such that the electrically conductive element 370 extends across the upper surface of the sensor plate 320. In the illustrated embodiment, the electrically conductive element 370 protrudes out of the lower portion 314 of the opening and onto the upper surface of the dielectric material 308.
As shown in
The cup-shaped inner surface 371 of the electrically conductive element 370 allows the chemical sensor 350 to have a small plan view area, while also having a sufficiently large surface area to avoid the noise issues associated with small sensing surfaces. The plan view area of the chemical sensor 350 is determined in part by the width (or diameter) of the reaction region 301 and can be made small, allowing for a high density array. In addition, because the sensing surface extends up the sidewall 303, the sensing surface area depends upon the distance of this extension and the circumference of the reaction region 301, and can be relatively large. As a result, low noise chemical sensors 350, 351 can be provided in a high density array, such that the characteristics of reactions can be accurately detected.
During manufacturing and/or operation of the device, a thin oxide of the material of the electrically conductive element 370 may be grown which acts as a sensing material (e.g. an ion-sensitive sensing material) for the chemical sensor 350. Whether an oxide is formed depends on the conductive material, the manufacturing processes performed, and the conditions under which the device is operated. For example, in one embodiment the electrically conductive element 370 may be titanium nitride, and titanium oxide or titanium oxynitride may be grown on the inner surface 371 of the conductive element 370 during manufacturing and/or during exposure to solutions during use.
In the illustrated example, the electrically conductive element 370 is shown as a single layer of material. More generally, the electrically conductive element 370 may comprise one or more layers of a variety of electrically conductive materials, such as metals or ceramics, depending upon the embodiment. The conductive material can be for example a metallic material or alloy thereof, or can be a ceramic material, or a combination thereof. An exemplary metallic material includes one of aluminum, copper, nickel, titanium, silver, gold, platinum, hafnium, lanthanum, tantalum, tungsten, iridium, zirconium, palladium, or a combination thereof. An exemplary ceramic material includes one of titanium nitride, titanium aluminum nitride, titanium oxynitride, tantalum nitride or a combination thereof.
In some alternative embodiments, an additional conformal sensing material (not shown) is deposited on the conductive element 370 and within the openings. The sensing material may comprise one or more of a variety of different materials to facilitate sensitivity to particular ions. For example, silicon nitride or silicon oxynitride, as well as metal oxides such as silicon oxide, aluminum or tantalum oxides, generally provide sensitivity to hydrogen ions, whereas sensing materials comprising polyvinyl chloride containing valinomycin provide sensitivity to potassium ions. Materials sensitive to other ions such as sodium, silver, iron, bromine, iodine, calcium, and nitrate may also be used, depending upon the embodiment.
In operation, reactants, wash solutions, and other reagents may move in and out of the reaction region 301 by a diffusion mechanism 340. The chemical sensor 350 is responsive to (and generates an output signal related to) the amount of charge 324 proximate to the conductive element 370. The presence of charge 324 in an analyte solution alters the surface potential at the interface between the conductive element 370 and the analyte solution within the reaction region 301. Changes in the charge 324 cause changes in the voltage on the floating gate structure 318, which in turn changes in the threshold voltage of the transistor. This change in threshold voltage can be measured by measuring the current in the channel region 323 between the source region 321 and a drain region 322. As a result, the chemical sensor 350 can be used directly to provide a current-based output signal on an array line connected to the source region 321 or drain region 322, or indirectly with additional circuitry to provide a voltage-based output signal.
Because the charge 324 is more highly concentrated near the bottom of the reaction region 301, the distance that the conductive element 370 extends up the sidewall 303 of the opening is a tradeoff between the amplitude of the desired signal detected in response to the charge 324, and the fluidic noise due to random fluctuation of charge between the conductive element 370 and the analyte solution. Increasing the distance that the conductive element 370 extends up the sidewall 303 increases the fluidic interface area for the chemical sensor 350, which acts to reduce the fluidic noise. However, due to the diffusion of charge 324 out of the reaction region 310, the concentration of charge 324 decreases with distance from the bottom of the reaction region 301. As a result, upper sidewall segments of the conductive element 370 detect portions of the signal from areas having lower charge concentration, which can reduce the overall amplitude of the desired signal detected by the sensor 350. In contrast, decreasing the distance the conductive element 370 extends up the sidewall 303 reduces the sensing surface area and thus increases the fluidic noise, but also increases the overall amplitude of the desired signal detected by the sensor 350.
For a very small sensing surface area, Applicants have found that the fluidic noise changes as a function of the sensing surface area differently than the amplitude of the desired signal. Because the SNR of the sensor output signal is the ratio of these two quantities, there is an optimal distance the conductive element 370 extends along the sidewall 303 at which SNR is maximum.
The optimal distance can vary from embodiment to embodiment depending on the material characteristics of the conductive element 370 and the dielectric material 310, the volume, shape, aspect ratio (such as base width-to-well depth ratio), and other dimensional characteristics of the reaction regions, the nature of the reaction taking place, as well as the reagents, byproducts, or labeling techniques (if any) that are employed. The optimal distance may for example be determined empirically.
As described in more detail below with respect to
In an embodiment, reactions carried out in the reaction region 301 can be analytical reactions to identify or determine characteristics or properties of an analyte of interest. Such reactions can generate directly or indirectly byproducts that affect the amount of charge adjacent to the electrically conductive element 370. If such byproducts are produced in small amounts or rapidly decay or react with other constituents, multiple copies of the same analyte may be analyzed in the reaction region 301 at the same time in order to increase the output signal generated. In an embodiment, multiple copies of an analyte may be attached to a solid phase support 312, either before or after deposition into the reaction region 301. The solid phase support 312 may be microparticles, nanoparticles, beads, solid or porous gels, or the like. For simplicity and ease of explanation, solid phase support 312 is also referred herein as a particle. For a nucleic acid analyte, multiple, connected copies may be made by rolling circle amplification (RCA), exponential RCA, Recombinase Polymerase Amplification (RPA), Polymerase Chain Reaction amplification (PCR), emulsion PCR amplification, or like techniques, to produce an amplicon without the need of a solid support.
In various exemplary embodiments, the methods, systems, and computer readable media described herein may advantageously be used to process and/or analyze data and signals obtained from electronic or charged-based nucleic acid sequencing. In electronic or charged-based sequencing (such as, pH-based sequencing), a nucleotide incorporation event may be determined by detecting ions (e.g., hydrogen ions) that are generated as natural by-products of polymerase-catalyzed nucleotide extension reactions. This may be used to sequence a sample or template nucleic acid, which may be a fragment of a nucleic acid sequence of interest, for example, and which may be directly or indirectly attached as a clonal population to a solid support, such as a particle, microparticle, bead, etc. The sample or template nucleic acid may be operably associated to a primer and polymerase and may be subjected to repeated cycles or “flows” of deoxynucleoside triphosphate (“dNTP”) addition (which may be referred to herein as “nucleotide flows” from which nucleotide incorporations may result) and washing. The primer may be annealed to the sample or template so that the primer's 3′ end can be extended by a polymerase whenever dNTPs complementary to the next base in the template are added. Then, based on the known sequence of nucleotide flows and on measured output signals of the chemical sensors indicative of ion concentration during each nucleotide flow, the identity of the type, sequence and number of nucleotide(s) associated with a sample nucleic acid present in a reaction region coupled to a chemical sensor can be determined.
The structure 400 can be formed by depositing a layer of gate dielectric material on the semiconductor substrate 354, and depositing a layer of polysilicon (or other electrically conductive material) on the layer of gate dielectric material. The layer of polysilicon and the layer gate dielectric material can then be etched using an etch mask to form the gate dielectric elements (e.g. gate dielectric 352) and the lowermost conductive material element of the floating gate structures. Following formation of an ion-implantation mask, ion implantation can then be performed to form the source and drain regions (e.g. source region 321 and a drain region 322) of the chemical sensors.
A first layer of the dielectric material 319 can then be deposited over the lowermost conductive material elements. Conductive plugs can then be formed within vias etched in the first layer of dielectric material 319 to contact the lowermost conductive material elements of the floating gate structures. A layer of conductive material can then be deposited on the first layer of the dielectric material 319 and patterned to form second conductive material elements electrically connected to the conductive plugs. This process can then be repeated multiple times to form the completed floating gate structure 318 shown in
Forming the structure 400 in
Next, dielectric material 308 having thickness 309 is deposited on the structure 400 illustrated in
Next, the dielectric material 308 of the structure in
The cavities 600, 602 may for example be formed by using a lithographic process to pattern a layer of photoresist on the dielectric material 308 to define the locations of the cavities 600, 602, and then anisotropically etching the dielectric material 308 using the patterned photoreist as an etch mask. The anisotropic etching of the dielectric material 308 may for example be a dry etch process, such as a fluorine based Reactive Ion Etching (RIE) process.
Next, a conformal layer of conductive material 700 is deposited on the structure illustrated in
The conductive material 700 may be deposited using various techniques, such as sputtering, reactive sputtering, atomic layer deposition (ALD), low pressure chemical vapor deposition (LPCVD), plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD), metal organic chemical vapor deposition (MOCVD), etc.
Next, the conductive material 700 is etched to form the conductive elements 370, 800, resulting in the structure illustrated in
The conductive elements 370, 800 may be formed for example by first forming mask elements within the cavities 600, 602. The mask elements can have widths greater than that of the cavities 600, 602, such that the mask elements extend over a portion of the upper surface of the dielectric material 308. The mask elements may for example be formed by patterning a layer of photoresist using a lithographic process. Alternatively, other materials and processes may be used to form the mask elements.
The conductive material 700 can then be etched using the mask elements as an etch mask. The etching removes exposed conductive material 700 from the upper surface of the dielectric material 308 and leave remaining material forming the conductive elements 370, 800. The mask elements can then be removed using for example a photoresist stripping process.
Next, dielectric material 310 is formed on the structure illustrated in
Next, dielectric material 310 is etched to form openings defining reaction regions 301, 302 extending to the conductive elements 370, 800, resulting in the structure illustrated in
Next, the hard mask material layer 1100 can be etched to form hard mask material elements 1102, 1104, 1106 on the dielectric material 310. The dielectric material 310 can then be etched using the hard mask material elements 1102, 1104, 1106 as an etch mask to form openings defining reaction regions 301, 302 extending to the conductive elements 370, 800, resulting in the structure illustrated in
Next, dielectric material 310 is formed on the structure illustrated in
At least a portion of the conductive material 700 between adjacent cavities 600, 602 is then etched to form the conductive elements 370, 800. The conductive material 700 can be etched using the techniques described above with reference to
The dielectric material 310 is then deposited and etched to form upper portions of the openings extending to the sacrificial material 1500, resulting in the structure illustrated in
A second etch process can then be performed to selectively remove the sacrificial material 1500 and expose the conductive elements 370, 800, resulting in the structure illustrated in
While the present invention is disclosed by reference to the preferred embodiments and examples detailed above, it is to be understood that these examples are intended in an illustrative rather than in a limiting sense. It is contemplated that modifications and combinations will readily occur to those skilled in the art, which modifications and combinations will be within the spirit of the invention and the scope of the following claims.
This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/868,739 filed Aug. 22, 2013 and 61/790,866 filed Mar. 15, 2013, the entire contents of which are incorporated by reference herein in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4086642 | Yoshida et al. | Apr 1978 | A |
4411741 | Janata | Oct 1983 | A |
4437969 | Covington et al. | Mar 1984 | A |
4490678 | Kuisl et al. | Dec 1984 | A |
4641084 | Komatsu | Feb 1987 | A |
4660063 | Anthony | Apr 1987 | A |
4691167 | Vlekkert et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4701253 | Litenberg et al. | Oct 1987 | A |
4722830 | Urie et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
4743954 | Brown | May 1988 | A |
4764797 | Shaw et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
4777019 | Dandekar | Oct 1988 | A |
4822566 | Newman | Apr 1989 | A |
4863849 | Melamede | Sep 1989 | A |
4864229 | Lauks et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4874499 | Smith et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
4971903 | Hyman | Nov 1990 | A |
5009766 | Lauks | Apr 1991 | A |
5038192 | Bonneau | Aug 1991 | A |
5110441 | Kinlen et al. | May 1992 | A |
5113870 | Rossenfeld | May 1992 | A |
5138251 | Koshiishi et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5151759 | Vinal | Sep 1992 | A |
5164319 | Hafeman et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5284566 | Cuomo et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5317407 | Michon | May 1994 | A |
5319226 | Sohn et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5407854 | Baxter et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5436149 | Barnes | Jul 1995 | A |
5439839 | Jang | Aug 1995 | A |
5466348 | Holm-Kennedy | Nov 1995 | A |
5490971 | Gifford et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5554339 | Cozzette et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5583462 | Grasshoff | Dec 1996 | A |
5587894 | Naruo | Dec 1996 | A |
5593838 | Zanzucchi et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5600451 | Maki | Feb 1997 | A |
5631704 | Dickinson et al. | May 1997 | A |
5637469 | Wilding et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5702964 | Lee | Dec 1997 | A |
5793230 | Chu et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5846708 | Hollis et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5911873 | McCarron et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5912560 | Pasternak | Jun 1999 | A |
5922591 | Anderson et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5923421 | Rajic et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5958703 | Dower et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5965452 | Kovacs | Oct 1999 | A |
6002299 | Thomsen | Dec 1999 | A |
6107032 | Kilger et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6191444 | Clampitt et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6195585 | Karunasiri et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6210891 | Nyren et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6262568 | Komatsu et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6274320 | Rothberg et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6327410 | Walt et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6355431 | Chee et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6361671 | Mathies et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6384684 | Redman-White | May 2002 | B1 |
6403957 | Fodor et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6406848 | Bridgham et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6429027 | Chee et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6432360 | Church | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6433386 | Yun et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6459398 | Gureshnik et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6465178 | Chappa et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6475728 | Martin et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6482639 | Snow et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6485944 | Church et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6490220 | Merritt et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6499499 | Dantsker et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6518024 | Choong et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6518146 | Singh et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6535824 | Mansky et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6537881 | Rangarajan et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6538593 | Yang et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6545620 | Groeneweg | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6571189 | Jensen et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6602702 | McDevitt et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6605428 | Kilger et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6613513 | Parce et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6624637 | Pechstein | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6627154 | Goodman et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6654505 | Bridgham et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6657269 | Migliorato et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6682899 | Bryan et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6682936 | Kovacs | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6700814 | Nahas et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6703660 | Yitzchaik et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6716629 | Hess et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6762022 | Makarov et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6770472 | Manalis et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6780591 | Williams et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6806052 | Bridgham et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6828100 | Ronaghi | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6831994 | Bridgham et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6841128 | Kambara et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6859570 | Walt et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6888194 | Yoshino | May 2005 | B2 |
6898121 | Chien et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6906524 | Chung et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6919211 | Fodor et al. | Jul 2005 | B1 |
6926865 | Howard | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6927045 | Hadd et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6929944 | Matson | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6939451 | Zhao et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6953958 | Baxter et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6958216 | Kelley et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6969488 | Bridgham et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6998274 | Chee et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7008550 | Li et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7019305 | Eversmann et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7022288 | Boss | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7033754 | Chee et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7037687 | Williams et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7045097 | Kovacs | May 2006 | B2 |
7049645 | Sawada et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7060431 | Chee et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7067886 | Bonges et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7084641 | Brederlow et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7085502 | Shushakov et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7087387 | Gerdes et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7090975 | Shultz et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7091059 | Rhodes | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7092757 | Larson et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7097973 | Zenhausern | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7105300 | Parce et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7129554 | Lieber et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7169560 | Lapidus et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7190026 | Lotfi et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7192745 | Jaeger | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7193453 | Wei et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7211390 | Rothberg et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7220550 | Keen | May 2007 | B2 |
7223540 | Pourmand et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7226734 | Chee et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7229799 | Williams et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7235389 | Lim et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7238323 | Knapp et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7244559 | Rothberg et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7244567 | Chen et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7264929 | Rothberg et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7264934 | Fuller | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7265929 | Umeda et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7267751 | Gelbart et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7276749 | Martin et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7279588 | Hong et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7282370 | Bridgham et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7285384 | Fan et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7291496 | Holm-Kennedy | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7297518 | Quake et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7298475 | Gandhi et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7303875 | Bock et al. | Dec 2007 | B1 |
7317216 | Holm-Kennedy | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7317484 | Dosluoglu et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7323305 | Leamon et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7335526 | Peters et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7335762 | Rothberg et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7359058 | Kranz et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7363717 | Ekseth et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7381936 | Tan et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7394263 | Pechstein et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7419636 | Aker et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7425431 | Church et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7455971 | Chee et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7462452 | Williams et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7462512 | Levon et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7462709 | Jaeger | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7465512 | Wright et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7466258 | Akopyan et al. | Dec 2008 | B1 |
7470352 | Eversmann et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7476504 | Turner | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7482153 | Okada et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7482677 | Lee et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7515124 | Yaguma et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7534097 | Wong et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7538827 | Chou | May 2009 | B2 |
7575865 | Leamon et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7576037 | Engelhardt et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7595883 | El Gamal et al. | Sep 2009 | B1 |
7605650 | Forbes | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7608810 | Yamada | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7609303 | Lee | Oct 2009 | B1 |
7612369 | Stasiak | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7612817 | Tay | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7622294 | Walt et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7645596 | Williams et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7649358 | Toumazou et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7667501 | Surendranath et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7686929 | Toumazou et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7695907 | Miyahara et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7733401 | Takeda | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7772383 | Chakrabarti et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7785785 | Pourmand et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7785790 | Church et al. | Aug 2010 | B1 |
7794584 | Chodavarapu et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7821806 | Horiuchi | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7838226 | Kamahori et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7842377 | Lanphere et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7842457 | Berka et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7859029 | Lee et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7859291 | Kim | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7875440 | Williams et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7884398 | Levon et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7885490 | Heideman et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7888013 | Miyahara et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7888015 | Toumazou et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7888708 | Yazawa et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7890891 | Stuber et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7898277 | Weir | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7923240 | Su | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7927797 | Nobile et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7932034 | Esfandyarpour et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7948015 | Rothberg et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7960776 | Kim et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7972828 | Ward et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7981362 | Glezer et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8012690 | Berka et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8017938 | Gomez et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8035175 | Shim et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8052863 | Suzuki et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8067731 | Matyjaszczyk et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8072188 | Yorinobu et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8114591 | Toumazou et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8124936 | Lagna | Feb 2012 | B1 |
8133698 | Silver et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8138496 | Li et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8199859 | Zerbe et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8217433 | Fife | Jul 2012 | B1 |
8231831 | Hartzell et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8232813 | Burdett et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8247849 | Fife et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8262900 | Rothberg et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8263336 | Rothberg et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8264014 | Rothberg et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8269261 | Rothberg et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8277628 | Ronaghi et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8293082 | Rothberg et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8306757 | Rothberg et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8313625 | Rothberg et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8313639 | Rothberg et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8317999 | Rothberg et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8343856 | Therrien et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8349167 | Rothberg et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8361713 | Bridgham et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8383396 | Kamahori et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8415716 | Rothberg et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8426898 | Rothberg et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8426899 | Rothberg et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8435395 | Rothberg et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8441044 | Rothberg et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8445194 | Drmanac et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8445945 | Rothberg et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8449824 | Sun | May 2013 | B2 |
8450781 | Rothberg et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8470164 | Rothberg et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8492800 | Rothberg et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8496802 | Rothberg et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8502278 | Rothberg et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8519448 | Rothberg et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8524057 | Rothberg et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8530941 | Rothberg et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8535513 | Rothberg et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8552771 | Jordan et al. | Oct 2013 | B1 |
8558288 | Rothberg et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8575664 | Rothberg et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8592154 | Rearick et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8653567 | Fife | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8658017 | Rothberg et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8673627 | Nobile et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8685230 | Rothberg et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8692298 | Rothberg et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8742469 | Milgrew | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8742472 | Rothberg et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8747748 | Li et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8748947 | Milgrew | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8764969 | Rothberg et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8766327 | Milgrew | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8766328 | Rothberg et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8776573 | Rearick et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8786331 | Jordan et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8796036 | Fife et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8821798 | Bustillo et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8823380 | Levine et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
20020012933 | Rothberg et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020042388 | Cooper et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020150909 | Stuelpnagel et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020168678 | Williams et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020172963 | Kelley et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030020334 | Nozu | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030054396 | Weiner | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030068629 | Rothberg et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030108867 | Chee et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030119020 | Stevens et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030124572 | Umek et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030124599 | Chen et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030141928 | Lee et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030141929 | Casper et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030152929 | Howard | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030155942 | Thewes et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030186262 | Cailloux et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030211502 | Sauer et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030215857 | Kilger et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030224419 | Corcoran et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030231531 | Baxter et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040023253 | Kunwar et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040079636 | Hsia et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040106211 | Kauer et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040134798 | Toumazou et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040136866 | Pontis et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040185484 | Costa et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040197803 | Yaku et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050006234 | Hassibi | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050009022 | Weiner et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050031490 | Gumbrecht et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050032075 | Yaku et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050058990 | Guia et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050106587 | Klapproth | May 2005 | A1 |
20050142033 | Glezer et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050156207 | Yazawa et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050181440 | Chee et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050191698 | Chee et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050202582 | Eversmann et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050212016 | Brunner et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050221473 | Dubin et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050230245 | Morgenshtein et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050230271 | Levon et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050233318 | Chee et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050239132 | Klapproth | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050282224 | Fouillet et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060024711 | Lapidus et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060057025 | Eversmann et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060057604 | Chen et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060073513 | Chee et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060141474 | Miyahara et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060166203 | Tooke et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060197118 | Migliorato et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060199193 | Koo et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060199493 | Hartmann et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060219558 | Hafeman et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060228721 | Leamon et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060246497 | Huang et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060269927 | Lieber | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070069291 | Stuber et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070087401 | Neilson et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070092872 | Rothberg et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070095663 | Chou et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070212681 | Shapiro et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070231824 | Chee et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070233477 | Halowani et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070262363 | Tao et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070278488 | Hirabayashi et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080003142 | Link et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080012007 | Li et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080014589 | Link et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080094074 | Kim et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080096216 | Quake et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080111161 | Sorge et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080121946 | Youn et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080185616 | Johnson et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080197022 | Suzuki et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080205559 | Iida | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080210931 | Truong et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080230386 | Srinivasan et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080286762 | Miyahara et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090048124 | Leamon et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090062132 | Bortner | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090079414 | Levon et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090120905 | Kohl et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090127589 | Rothberg et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090127689 | Ye et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090156425 | Walt et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090170728 | Walt et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090194416 | Hsiung et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20100007326 | Nakazato | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100133547 | Kunze et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100137143 | Rothberg et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100244106 | Parker et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100273166 | Garcia | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100300895 | Nobile et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100301398 | Rothberg et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110037121 | Lee et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110062972 | Je et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110114827 | Yamaoka et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110165557 | Ah et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110181253 | Isham et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110217697 | Rothberg et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110262903 | Rothberg et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110263463 | Rothberg et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110275522 | Rothberg et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110281737 | Rothberg et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110281741 | Rothberg et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110287945 | Rothberg et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110299337 | Parris et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120000274 | Fife | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120001056 | Fife et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120001236 | Fife et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120001237 | Fife et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120001646 | Bolander et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120001779 | Fife et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120013392 | Rothberg et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120022795 | Johnson et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120034607 | Rothberg et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120045368 | Hinz et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120055811 | Rothberg et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120055813 | Rothberg et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120056248 | Fife et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120129703 | Rothberg et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120129732 | Rothberg et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120135870 | Rothberg et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120143531 | Davey et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120161207 | Homyk et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120173159 | Davey et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120247977 | Rothberg et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120261274 | Rearick et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120286771 | Rothberg et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120326213 | Bustillo et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120326767 | Milgrew | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120329043 | Milgrew | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120329044 | Milgrew | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120329192 | Bustillo et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130001653 | Milgrew | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130004949 | Rearick et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130009214 | Bustillo et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130210128 | Rothberg et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130210182 | Rothberg et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130210641 | Rothberg et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130217004 | Rothberg et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130217587 | Rothberg et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130281307 | Li et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130324421 | Rothberg et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140080717 | Li et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140148345 | Li et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140235452 | Rothberg et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140235463 | Rothberg et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1582334 | Feb 2005 | CN |
1585896 | Feb 2005 | CN |
1826525 | Aug 2006 | CN |
102203282 | Sep 2011 | CN |
4430811 | Sep 1995 | DE |
19512117 | Oct 1996 | DE |
102008012899 | Sep 2009 | DE |
1975246 | Mar 1984 | EP |
0223618 | May 1987 | EP |
1371974 | Dec 2003 | EP |
1432818 | Jun 2004 | EP |
1542009 | Jun 2005 | EP |
1557884 | Jul 2005 | EP |
1870703 | Dec 2007 | EP |
2307577 | Apr 2011 | EP |
2457851 | Sep 2009 | GB |
2461127 | Jul 2010 | GB |
58070155 | Apr 1983 | JP |
2000055874 | Feb 2000 | JP |
2002272463 | Sep 2002 | JP |
2005218310 | Aug 2004 | JP |
2005077210 | Mar 2005 | JP |
2005518541 | Jun 2005 | JP |
2006138846 | Jun 2006 | JP |
2011525810 | Sep 2011 | JP |
100442838 | Jul 2004 | KR |
100455283 | Oct 2004 | KR |
WO8909283 | Oct 1989 | WO |
WO9813523 | Apr 1998 | WO |
WO9846797 | Oct 1998 | WO |
WO0120039 | Mar 2001 | WO |
WO0181896 | Nov 2001 | WO |
WO02077287 | Oct 2002 | WO |
WO02086162 | Oct 2002 | WO |
WO03073088 | Sep 2003 | WO |
WO2004040291 | May 2004 | WO |
WO2004048962 | Jun 2004 | WO |
WO2005015156 | Feb 2005 | WO |
WO2005043160 | May 2005 | WO |
WO2005047878 | May 2005 | WO |
WO2005054431 | Jun 2005 | WO |
WO2005062049 | Jul 2005 | WO |
WO2005084367 | Sep 2005 | WO |
WO2005090961 | Sep 2005 | WO |
WO2006005967 | Jan 2006 | WO |
WO2006022370 | Mar 2006 | WO |
WO2007002204 | Jan 2007 | WO |
WO2007086935 | Aug 2007 | WO |
WO2008007716 | Jan 2008 | WO |
WO2008058282 | May 2008 | WO |
WO2008076406 | Jun 2008 | WO |
WO2008107014 | Sep 2008 | WO |
WO2009012112 | Jan 2009 | WO |
WO2009041917 | Apr 2009 | WO |
WO2009074926 | Jun 2009 | WO |
WO2009081890 | Jul 2009 | WO |
WO2009158006 | Dec 2009 | WO |
WO2010008480 | Jan 2010 | WO |
WO2010047804 | Apr 2010 | WO |
WO2010138182 | Dec 2010 | WO |
WO2012003359 | Jan 2012 | WO |
WO2012003363 | Jan 2012 | WO |
WO2012003368 | Jan 2012 | WO |
WO2012003380 | Jan 2012 | WO |
WO2012006222 | Jan 2012 | WO |
WO2012152308 | Nov 2012 | WO |
Entry |
---|
[No Author Listed], “ISFET Wikipedia article”, Wikipedia, Last modified Nov. 7, 2006. |
Akiyama, T. et al., “Ion-Sensitive Field-Effect Transistors with Inorganic Gate Oxide for pH Sensing”, IEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. ED-29 (12), 1982, pp. 1936-1941. |
AU2011226767 Search Information Statement Mailed Oct. 26, 2011. |
Bandiera, L. et al., “A fully electronic sensor for the measurement of cDNA hybridization kinetics”, Biosens Bioelectron, vol. 22, 2007, pp. 2108-2114. |
Barbaro, M. et al., “A Charge-Modulated FET for Detection of Biomolecular Processes: Conception, Modeling, and Simulation”, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 53(1), 2006, pp. 158-166. |
Barbaro, M. et al., “A CMOS, Fully Integrated Sensor for Electronic Detection of DNA Hybridization”, IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 27(7), 2006, pp. 595-597. |
Barbaro, M. et al., “Fully electronic DNA hybridization detection by a standard CMOS biochip”, Sensors and Actuators B Chemical, vol. 118, 2006, pp. 41-46. |
Bashford, G. et al., “Automated bead-trapping apparatus and control system for single-molecule DNA sequencing”, Optics Express, vol. 16(5), 2008, pp. 3445-3455. |
Baumann, W. et al., “Microelectronic sensor system for microphysiological application on living cells”, Sensors and Actuators B, vol. 55(1), 1999, pp. 77-89. |
Bausells, J. et al., “Ion-sensitive field-effect transistors fabricated in a commercial CMOS technology”, Sensors and Actuators B Chemical, vol. 57(1-3), 1999, pp. 56-62. |
Bergveld, P., “ISFET, Theory and Practice”, IEEE Sensor Conference, Toronto, Oct. 2003, 2003, pp. 1-26. |
Bergveld, P., “Thirty years of ISFETOLOGY What happened in the past 30 years and what may happen in the next 30 years”, Sensors and Actuators B, vol. 88(1), 2003, pp. 1-20. |
Besselink, G. et al., “ISFET Affinity Sensor”, Methods in Biotechnology, vol. 7: Affinity Biosensors: Techniques and Protocols, 1998, pp. 173-185. |
Bobrov, P. et al., “Chemical sensitivity of an ISFET with Ta2O5 membrane in strong acid and alkaline solutions”, Sensors and Actuators B, vol. 3, 1991, pp. 75-81. |
Bockelmann, U. et al., “Detecting DNA by field effect transistor arrays”, Proceedings of the 2006 IFIP International Conference on Very Large Scale Integration, 2006, 164-168. |
Bousse, L. et al., “A process for the combined fabrication of ion sensors and CMOS circuits”, IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 9(1), 1988, pp. 44-46. |
Bousse, L. et al., “Zeta potential measurements of Ta2O5 and SiO2 thin films”, J. Colloid Interface Sci., vol. 147(1), 1991, pp. 22-32. |
Chan, Wai P. et al., “An Integrated ISFETs Instrumentation System in Standard CMOS Technology”, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 45, No. 9, 2010, pp. 1923-1934. |
Chen, Y. et al., “Nanoscale field effect transistor for biomolecular signal amplification”, App Phys Letter, vol. 91(24), 2007, pp. 243511-1-243511-3. |
Chen, Y. et al., “Silicon-based nanoelectronic field-effect pH sensor with local gate control”, App Phys Letter, vol. 89, 2006, pp. 223512-1-223512-3. |
Chou, J. et al., “Letter to the Editor on Simulation of Ta2O5 gate ISFET temperature characteristics”, Sensors and Actuators B, vol. 80, 2001, pp. 290-291. |
Chou, J. et al., “Simulation of Ta2O5 gate ISFET temperature characteristics”, Sensor and Actuators B, vol. 71, Letter to the Editor, 2000, pp. 73-76. |
Chung, W-Y. et al., “ISFET interface circuit embedded with noise rejection capability”, Electronics Letters, vol. 40(18), e-pub, 2004, 1115-1116. |
Chung, W-Y. et al., “ISFET performance enhancement by using the improved circuit techniques”, Sensors and Actuators B, vol. 113, 2006, pp. 555-562. |
Chung, W-Y. et al., “New ISFET Interface Circuit Design with Temperature Compensation”, Microelectronics Journal, vol. 37(10), 2006, pp. 1105-1114. |
Chung, W-Y. et al., “Temperature Compensation Electronics for ISFET Readout Applications”, Biomedical Circuits and Systems, IEEE International Workshop Singapore, 2004, pp. 305-308. |
Dazhong, Z. et al. “Research of CMOS Biosensor IC for Extracellular Electrophysiological Signal Recording and pH value Measuring” Solid-State and Integrated Circuit Technology, 9th International Conference, Oct. 20, 2008, pp. 2557-2560. |
Eijkel, J. et al., “Measuring Donnan-related phenomena using a solid-state ion sensor and a concentration-step method”, J. Membrane Sci., vol. 127, 1997, pp. 203-221. |
Eijkel, J., “Potentiometric detection and characterization of adsorbed protein using stimulus-response measurement techniques”, Thesis, Sep. 3, 1955, pp. 1-147; 160-192. |
Eltoukhy, H. et al., “A 0.18um CMOS 10-6 lux Bioluminescence Detection System-on-Chip”, ISSCC 2004/Session12/Biomicrosystems/12.3, 2004, pp. 1-3. |
Eltoukhy, H. et al., “A. 0.18-um CMOS Bioluminescence Detection Lab-on-Chip”, IEEE J Solid-State Circuits, vol. 41(3), 2006, pp. 651-662. |
EP09798251.6 EP Extended Search Report Aug. 27, 2013. |
EP11801437.2 EP Extended Search Report Jul. 25, 2013. |
EP11801437.2 EP Search Report Jul. 8, 2014. |
EP11801439.8 EP Extended Search Report Mar. 7, 2014. |
EP11804218.3 EP Extended Search Report Jul. 11, 2013. |
EP11827128.7 EP Search Report Aug. 1, 2013. |
EP13161312.7 EP Extended Search Report Oct. 15, 2013. |
EP13163995.7 EP Extended Search Report Aug. 20, 2013. |
EP13163995.7 EP Search Report Jul. 9, 2014. |
EP13164768.7 EP Extended Search Report Aug. 20, 2013. |
EP13174555.6 EP Extended Search Report Dec. 12, 2013. |
EP13174555.6 EP Search Report Nov. 21, 2013. |
EP13177039.8 EP Search Report Nov. 21, 2013. |
EP13177590.0 EP Search Report Nov. 20, 2013. |
EP14152861.2 EP Search Report Jul. 7, 2014. |
EP7867780.4 EP Examination Report Jul. 3, 2012. |
Eriksson, J. et al. “Pyrosequencing Technology at Elevated Temperature” Electrophoresis, vol. 25, 2004, pp. 20-27. |
Esfandyarpour, H. et al., “Gate-controlled microfluidic chamber with magnetic bead for DNA sequencing-by-synthesis technology”, Proc 5th Intl Conf Nanochannels, Microchannels and Minichannels, Puebla, Mexico, Jun. 18-20, 2007, pp. 1-5. |
Eversmann, B. et al., “A 128 x 128 CMOS Biosensor Array for Extracellular Recording of Neural Activity”, IEEE J. Solid-State Circ., vol. 38(12), 2003, pp. 2306-2317. |
Faramarzpour, N. et al., “CMOS-Based Active Pixel for Low-Light Level Detection: Analysis and Measurements”, IEEE Trans Electron Devices, vol. 54(12), 2007, pp. 3229-3237. |
Finn, A. et al., “Towards an Optimization of FET-Based Bio-Sensors”, European Cells and Materials, vol. 4, Sup 2, 2002, pp. 21-23. |
Fraden, J., “Handbook of Modern Sensors-Physics, Designs, and Applications”, 17.3.2 CHEMFET Sensors, 1996, pp. 499-501. |
Fritz, J. et al., “Electronic detection of DNA by its intrinsic molecular charge”, PNAS, vol. 99(22), 2002, pp. 14142-14146. |
GB0811656.8 Search and Examination Report Mar. 12, 2010. |
GB0811656.8 Search Report Sep. 21, 2009. |
GB0811657.6 Examination Report Jun. 30, 2010. |
GB0811657.6 Search Report under Section 17 Oct. 26, 2009. |
Gracia, I. et al., “Test Structures for ISFET Chemical Sensors”, Proc IEEE 1992 Intl Conf Microelec Test Struct, 1992, pp. 156-159. |
Hammond, et al., “Performance and System-On-Chip Integration of an Unmodified CMOS ISFET”, Science Direct, Sensors and Actuators vol. 111-112, 2005, pp. 254-258. |
Hammond, P. et al., “A System-on-Chip Digital pH Meter for Use in a Wireless Diagnostic Capsule”, IEEE Trans Biomedical Eng., vol. 52(4), 2005, pp. 687-694. |
Hammond, P. et al., “Design of a Single-Chip pH Sensor Using a Conventional 0.6-μm CMOS Process”, IEEE Sensors Journal, vol. 4(6), 2004, pp. 706-712. |
Hammond, P. et al., “Encapsulation of a liquid-sensing microchip using SU-8 photoresist”, MicoElectronic Engineering, vol. 73-74, 2004, pp. 893-897. |
Hammond, S. et al., “Genomic sequencing and analysis of a Chinese Hamster ovary cell line using Illumina sequencing technology”, BMC Genomics, vol. 12:67, 2011, pp. 1-8. |
Han, Y., “Label-free detection of biomolecules by a field-effect transistor microarray biosensor with bio-functionalized gate surfaces”, Aachen, Techn. Hochsch., Diss., 2006, pp. 1-63. |
Hanshaw, R. et al., “An indicator displacement system for fluorescent detection of phosphate oxyanions under physiological conditions” Science Direct, Tetrahedron Ltrs., vol. 45, 2004, pp. 8721-8724. |
Hara, H. et al., “Dynamic response of a Ta2O5-gate pH-sensitive field-effect transistor”, Sensors Actuators B, vol. 32, 1996, pp. 115-119. |
Hermon, Z. et al., “Miniaturized bio-electronic hybrid for chemical sensing applications”, Tech Connect News, 2008, p. 1. |
Hideshima, S. et al., “Detection of tumor marker in blood serum using antibody-modified field effect transistor with optimized BSA blocking”, Sensors and Actuations B: Chemical, vol. 161, 2012, pp. 146-150. |
Hizawa, et al. “Sensing Characteristics of Charge Transfer Type pH Sensor by Accumulative Operation” IEEE Sensors, EXCO, Daegu, Korea, 2006, pp. 144-147. |
Hizawa, T. et al., “32×32 pH Image Sensors for Real Time Observation of Biochemical Phenomena”, Solid-State Sensors, Actuators and Microsystems Conference, 2007, Transducers 2007. International, 2007, pp. 1311-1312. |
Hizawa, T. et al., “Fabrication of a two-dimensional pH image sensor using a charge transfer technique”, Sensors and Actuators B Chemical, vol. 117, 2006, pp. 509-515. |
Ingebrandt, Sven et al., “Label-free Detection of DNA using Field-Effect Transistors”, Phys. stat. sol. (a) 203, No. 14, 2006, pp. 3399-3411. |
Jakobson, C. et al., “Low frequency noise and drift in Ion Sensitive Field Effect Transistors”, Sensors Actuators B, vol. 68, 2000, pp. 134-139. |
Ji, H. et al., “A CMOS contact imager for locating individual cells”, ISCAS, 2006, pp. 3357-3360. |
Ji, H. et al., “Contact Imaging: Simulation and Experiment”, IEEE Trans Circuits Systems-I: Regular Papers, vol. 54(8), 2007, pp. 1698-1710. |
Kim, D. et al., “An FET-type charger sensor for highly sensitive detection of DNA sequence”, Biosens Bioelectron, vol. 20(1), 2004, pp. 69-74. |
Klein, M., “Time effects of ion-sensitive field-effect transistors”, Sensors and Actuators B, vol. 17(1-2), 1989, pp. 203-208. |
Koch, S. et al., “Protein detection with a novel ISFET-based zeta potential analyzer”, Biosensors & Bioelectronics, vol. 14, 1999, pp. 413-421. |
Krause, M. et al., “Extended Gate Electrode Arrays for Extracellular Signal Recordings”, Sensors and Actuators B, vol. 70, 2000, pp. 101-107. |
Kruise, J. et al., “Detection of protein concentrations using a pH-step titration method”, Sensors Actuators B, vol. 44, 1997, pp. 297-303. |
Leamon, J. et al., “A Massively Parallel PicoTiterPlate Based Platform for Discrete Picoliter-Scale Polymerase Chain Reactions”, Electrophoresis, vol. 24, 2003, pp. 3769-3777. |
Leamon, J. et al., “Cramming More Sequencing Reactions onto Microreactor Chips”, Chemical Reviews, vol. 107, 2007, pp. 3367-3376. |
Lee, C-S. et al., “Ion-sensitive Field-Effect Transistor for Biological Sensing”, Sensors, vol. 9, 2009, pp. 7111-7131. |
Lee, S. et al. “An Enhanced Glucose Biosensor Using Charge Transfer Techniques” Biosensors and Bioelectronics, vol. 24, 2008, pp. 650-656. |
Lohrengel, M. et al., “A new microcell or microreactor for material surface investigations at large current densities”, Electrochimica Acta, vol. 49, 2004, pp. 2863-2870. |
Lui, A. et al., “A Test Chip for ISFET/CMNOS Technology Development”, Proc. of the 1996 IEEE Intl. Conf. on Microelectronic Test Structures, vol. 9, 1996, pp. 123-128. |
Maki, W et al., “Nanowire-transistor based ultra-sensitive DNA methylation detection”, Biosensors & Bioelectronics, vol. 23, 2008, pp. 780-787. |
Margulies, M. et al., “Genome sequencing in microfabricated high-density picolitre reactors”, Nature, vol. 437(7057), 2005, pp. 376-380. |
Marshall, A. et al., “DNA chips: an array of possibilities”, Nature Biotechnology, vol. 16, 1998, pp. 27-31. |
Martinoia, S. et al., “A behavioral macromodel of the ISFET in SPICE”, Sensors Actuators B, vol. 62, 2000, pp. 182-189. |
Martinoia, S. et al., “Development of ISFET Array-Based Microsystems for Bioelectrochemical measurements of cell populations”, Biosensors & Bioelectronics, vol. 16, 2001, pp. 1043-1050. |
Matsuo, J. et al. “Charge Transfer Type pH Sensor with Super High Sensitivity” 14th International Conference on Solid-State Sensors Actuators and Microsystems, France, Jun. 10-14, 2007, pp. 1881-1884. |
Medoro, G. et al., “A Lab-on-a-Chip for Cell Detection and Manipulation”, IEEE Sensors J, vol. 3(3), 2003, pp. 317-325. |
Meyburg, S. et al., “N-Channel field-effect transistors with floating gates for extracellular recordings”, Biosens Bioelectron, vol. 21(7), 2006, pp. 1037-1044. |
Milgrew, M. et al. “A Proton Camera Array Technology for Direct Extracellular Ion Imaging” IEEE International Symposium on Industrial Electronics, 2008, pp. 2051-255. |
Milgrew, M. et al., “A 16×16 CMOS proton camera array for direct extracellular imaging of hydrogen-ion activity”, IEEE Intl Solid-State Circuits Conf, Session 32:24, 2008, pp. 590-638. |
Milgrew, M. et al., “A large transistor based sensor array chip for direct extracellular imaging”, Sensors and Actuators B Chemical, vol. 111-112, 2005, pp. 347-353. |
Milgrew, M. et al., “Matching the transconductance characteristics of CMOS ESFET arrays by removing trapped charge”, IEEE Trans Electron Devices, vol. 55(4), 2008, pp. 1074-1079. |
Milgrew, M. et al., “Microsensor Array Technology for Direct Extracellular Imaging”, Dept Electronic and EE, University of Glasgow, 2006, pp. 1-23. |
Milgrew, M. et al., “The development of scalable sensor arrays using standard CMOS technology”, Sensors and Actuators B, vol. 103, 2004, pp. 37-42. |
Milgrew, M. et al., “The fabrication of scalable multi-sensor arrays using standard CMOS technology”, 2003 IEEE Custom Integrated Circuits Conference, 2003, pp. 513-516. |
Miyahara, Y. et al., “Biochip Using Micromachining Technology”, J. Institute of Electrostatics, Japan, vol. 27(6), (Translation Included), 2003, pp. 268-272. |
Miyahara, Y. et al., “Direct Transduction of Primer Extension into Electrical Signal Using Genetic Field Effect Transistor”, Micro Total Analysis Systems 2004, vol. 1, 2004, pp. 303-305. |
Miyahara, Y. et al., “Potentiometric Detection of DNA Molecules Using Field Effect Transistor”, The Japan Society of Applied Physics, No. 3 (Translation included), 2003, pp. 1180. |
Nishiguchi, K. et al. “Si nanowire ion-sensitive field-effect transistors with a shared floating gate” Applied Physics Letters vol. 94, 2009 pp. 163106-1 to 163106-3. |
Nyren, P. et al., “Enzymatic Method for Continuous Monitoring of Inorganic Pyrophosphate Synthesis”, Analytical Biochemistry, vol. 151, 1985, pp. 504-509. |
Oelbner, W. et al., “Encapsulation of ESFET sensor chips”, Sensors Actuators B, vol. 105, 2005, pp. 104-117. |
Oelbner, W. et al., “Investigation of the dynamic response behaviour of ISFET pH sensors by means of laser Doppler velocimetry (LDV)”, Sensors Actuators B, vol. 26-27, 1995, pp. 345-348. |
Offenhausser, A. et al., “Field-Effect transistor array for monitoring electrical activity from mammalian neurons in culture”, Biosensors & Bioelectronics, vol. 12(8), 1997, pp. 819-826. |
Ohno, Y. et al., “Electrolyte-Gated Graphene Field-Effect Transistors for Detecting pH and Protein Adsorption”, Nano Letters, vol. 9(9), Jul. 28, 2009, pp. 3318-3322. |
Palan, B. et al., “New ISFET sensor interface circuit for biomedical applications”, Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical: International Journal Devoted to Research and Development of Physical and Chemical Transducers, Elsevier S.A. Ch., vol. 57, No. 1-3, 1999, pp. 63-68. |
Park, K-Y. et al., “ISFET Glucose Sensor System With Fast Recovery Characteristics by Employing Electrolysis”, Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, vol. 83 (1-3), 2002, pp. 90-97. |
Patolsky, F. et al., “Nanowire-Based Biosensors”, Analyt Chem 1, vol. 78(13), 2006, pp. 4261-4269. |
PCT/US2007/025721 International Preliminary Report and Written Opinion on Patentability Jun. 16, 2009. |
PCT/US2009/003766 International Preliminary Report on Patentability Jan. 5, 2011. |
PCT/US2009/003766 International Search Report and Written Opinion Apr. 8, 2010. |
PCT/US2009/003797 International Search Report and Written Opinion Mar. 12, 2010. |
PCT/US2009/005745 International Preliminary Report on Patentability Apr. 26, 2011. |
PCT/US2009/005745 International Search Report and Written Opinion Dec. 11, 2009. |
PCT/US2010/001543 International Preliminary Report on Patentability Nov. 29, 2011. |
PCT/US2010/001543 International Search Report and Written Opinion Oct. 13, 2010. |
PCT/US2010/048835 International Preliminary Report on Patentability Mar. 19, 2013. |
PCT/US2010/048835 International Search Report and Written Opinion Dec. 16, 2010. |
PCT/US2011/042655 International Search Report and Written Opinion Oct. 21, 2011. |
PCT/US2011/042660 International Search Report and Written Opinion Nov. 2, 2011. |
PCT/US2011/042665 International Search Report and Written Opinion Nov. 2, 2011. |
PCT/US2011/042668 International Preliminary Report on Patentability Mar. 26, 2013. |
PCT/US2011/042668 International Search Report and Written Opinion Oct. 28, 2011. |
PCT/US2011/042669 International Search Report and Written Opinion Jan. 9, 2012. |
PCT/US2011/042683 International Preliminary Report on Patentability Jun. 4, 2013. |
PCT/US2011/042683 International Search Report and Written Opinion Feb. 16, 2012. |
PCT/US2012/058996 International Search Report and Written Opinion Jan. 22, 2013. |
PCT/US2012/071471 International Preliminary Report on Patentability Jun. 24, 2014. |
PCT/US2012/071471 International Search Report and Written Opinion Apr. 24, 2013. |
PCT/US2012/071482 International Search Report and Written Opinion May 23, 2013. |
PCT/US2013/022129 International Preliminary Report on Patentability Jul. 22, 2014. |
PCT/US2013/022129 International Search Report and Written Opinion Aug. 9, 2013. |
PCT/US2013/022140 International Preliminary Report on Patentability Jul. 22, 2014. |
PCT/US2013/022140 International Search Report and Written Opinion May 2, 2013. |
PCT/US2014/020887 International Search Report and Written Opinion May 30, 2014. |
PCT/US2014/020892 International Search Report and Written Opinion Jun. 3, 2014. |
PCT/US2014/040923 International Search Report and Written Opinion Sep. 1, 2014. |
Poghossian, A. et al., “Functional testing and characterization of ISFETs on wafer level by means of a micro-droplet cell”, Sensors, vol. 6, 2006, pp. 397-404. |
Pollack, J. et al., “Genome-Wide Analysis of DNA copy-number changes using cDNA Microarrays”, Nature Genetics, vol. 23, 1999, pp. 41-46. |
Pourmand, N. et al., “Direct electrical detection of DNA synthesis”, PNAS, vol. 103(17), 2006, pp. 6466-6470. |
Pouthas, F. et al., “Spatially resolved electronic detection of biopolymers”, Phys Rev, vol. 70, 2004, pp. 031906-1-031906-8. |
Premanode, B. et al. “Drift Reduction in Ion-Sensitive FETs Using Correlated Double Sampling”, Electronics Letters, IEEE Stevenage, GB, vol. 43 (16) Aug. 2, 2007. |
Premanode, B. et al., “A composite ISFED readout circuit employing current feedback”, Sensors Actuators B, vol. 127, 2007, pp. 486-490. |
Premanode, B. et al., “A novel, low power biosensor for real time monitoring of creatine and urea in peritoneal dialysis”, Sensors Actuators B, vol. 120, 2007, pp. 732-735. |
Premanode, B. et al., “Ultra-low power precision ISFET readout using global current feedback”, Electronic Let, vol. 42(22), 2006, pp. 1264-1265. |
Purushothaman, S. et al., “Protons and single nucleotide polymorphism detection: A simple use for the Ion Sensitive Field Effect Transistor”, Sensors and Actuators B Chemical, vol. 114(2), 2006, pp. 964-968. |
Purushothaman, S. et al., “Towards Fast Solid State DNA Sequencing”, IEEE ISCAS 2002 Proceedings, Circuits and Systems, vol. 4, 2002, pp. IV-169-IV-172. |
Rodriguez-Villegas, E., “Solution to trapped charge in FGMOS transistors”, Electronics Letters, vol. 39(19), 2003. |
Rothberg, J. et al., “An integrated semiconductor device enabling non-optical genome sequencing” Nature, vol. 475, No. 7356, 2011, pp. 348-352. |
Sakata, T. et al., “Cell-based field effect devices for cell adhesion analysis”, Intl. Conf. on Microtechnologies in Medicine and Biology, May 9-12, 2006, Okinawa, Japan, pp. 177-179. |
Sakata, T. et al., “Detection of DNA recognition events using multi-well field effect transistor”, Biosensors and Bioelectronics vol. 21, 2005, pp. 827-832. |
Sakata, T. et al., “Detection sensitivity of genetic field effect transistor combined with charged nanoparticle-DNA conjugate”, Proc. of 2006 Intl. Conf. on Microtechnologies in Medicine and Biology, May 9-12, 2006, Okinawa, Japan, pp. 97-100. |
Sakata, T. et al., “Direct detection of single nucleotide polymorphism using genetic field effect transistor”, Digest of Papers Microprocesses and Nanotechnology 2004, Osaka, Japan, 2004 International Microprocesses and Nanotechnology Conference, 2004, pp. 226-227. |
Sakata, T. et al., “Direct Detection of Single-Base Extension Reaction Using Genetic Field Effect Transistor”, Proc. of 3rd Ann. Intl. IEEE EMBS Special Topic Conf. on Microtechnologies in Medicine and Biology, Kahuku, Oahu, HI, May 12-15, 2005, pp. 219-222. |
Sakata, T. et al., “Direct transduction of allele-specific primer extension into electrical signal using genetic field effect transistor”, Biosensors and Bioelectronics, vol. 22, 2007, pp. 1311-1316. |
Sakata, T. et al., “DNA Analysis Chip Based on Field-Effect Transistors”, Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 44(4B), 2005, pp. 2854-2859. |
Sakata, T. et al., “DNA Sequencing Based on Intrinsic Molecular Charges”, Angewandte Chemie International Edition 2006, vol. 45, 2006, pp. 2225-2228. |
Sakata, T. et al., “DNA Sequencing Using Genetic Field Effect Transistor”, Solid-State Sensors, Actuators and Microsystems, vol. 2, 2005, pp. 1676-1679. |
Sakata, T. et al., “Immobilization of oligonucleotide probes on Si3N4 surface and its application to genetic field effect transistor”, Materials Science and Engineering: C, vol. 24, 2004, pp. 827-832. |
Sakata, T. et al., “Potential Behavior of Biochemically Modified Gold Electrode for Extended-Gate Field-Effect Transistor”, Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 44(4B), 2005, pp. 2860-2863. |
Sakata, T. et al., “Potential Response of Genetic Field Effect Transistor to Charged Nanoparticle-DNA Conjugate”, Digest of Papers Microprocesses and Nanotechnology 2005, Tokyo, Japan, 2005 Intl Microprocesses and Nanotech Conf., Hotel Bellclassic, 2005, pp. 42-43. |
Sakata, T. et al., “Potentiometric Detection of Allele Specific Oligonucleotide Hybridization Using Genetic Field Effect Transistor”, Micro Total Analysis Systems, 8th Intl. Conf. on Miniaturized Systems for Chemistry and Life Sciences, 2004, pp. 300-302. |
Sakata, T. et al., “Potentiometric detection of DNA molecules hybridization using gene field effect transistor and intercalator” Materials Research Society Symposium Proceedings, vol. 782, 2004, pp. 393-400. |
Sakata, T. et al., “Potentiometric Detection of DNA Using Genetic Transistor”, Denki Gakkai Kenkyukai Shiryo Chemical Sensor Kenkyukai, CHS-03-51-55, 2003, pp. 1-5. |
Sakata, T. et al., “Potentiometric Detection of Single Nucleotide Polymorphism by Using a Genetic Field-effect transistor”, ChemBioChem, vol. 6, 2005, pp. 703-710. |
Sakurai, T. et al., “Real-Time Monitoring of DNA Polymerase Reactions by a Micro ISFET pH Sensor”, Anal Chem, vol. 64(17), 1992, pp. 1996-1997. |
Salama, K., “CMOS luminescence detection lab-on-chip: modeling, design, and characterization”, Thesis, Presented at Stanford University, 2005, pp. ii-78. |
Salama, K., “Modeling and simulation of luminescence detection platforms”, Biosensors & Bioelectronics, 2004, pp. 1377-1386. |
Sawada, K. et al., “A novel fused sensor for photo- and ion-sensing”, Sensors Actuators B, vol. 106, 2005, pp. 614-618. |
Sawada, K. et al., “Highly sensitive ion sensors using charge transfer technique”, Sensors Actuators B, vol. 98, 2004, pp. 69-72. |
Schasfoort, R. et al., “A new approach to immunoFET operation”, Biosensors & Bioelectronics, vol. 5, 1990, pp. 103-124. |
Schasfoort, R. et al., “Field-effect flow control for microfabricated fluidic networks”, Science, vol. 286(5441), 1999, pp. 942-945. |
Schoning, M. et al., “Bio FEDs (Field-Effect Devices): State-of-the-Art and New Directions”, Electroanalysis, vol. 18(19-20), 2006, pp. 1893-1900. |
Seong-Jin, K. et al. “Label-Free CMOS DNA Quantification With On-Chip Noise Reduction Schemes” Solid-State Sensors, Actuators and Microsystems Conference, IEEE, Jun. 10, 2013, pp. 947-950. |
SG200903992-6 Search and Examination Report Jan. 20, 2011. |
Shah, N., “Microfabrication of a parallel-array DNA pyrosequencing chip”, NNIN REU Research Accomplishments, 2005, pp. 130-131. |
Shepherd, L. et al., “A biochemical translinear principle with weak inversion ISFETs”, IEEE Trans Circuits Syst-I, vol. 52(12), 2005, pp. 2614-2619. |
Shepherd, L. et al., “A novel voltage-clamped CMOS ISFET sensor interface”, IEEE, 2007, pp. 3331-3334. |
Shepherd, L. et al., “Towards direct biochemical analysis with weak inversion ISFETS”, Intl Workshop on Biomedical, 2004, S1.5-5-S1.5-8. |
Shepherd, L. et al., “Weak inversion ISFETs for ultra-low power biochemical sensing and real-time analysis”, Sensors Actuators B, vol. 107, 2005, pp. 468-473. |
Shi, Y. et al., “Radical Capillary Array Electrophoresis Microplace and Scanner for High-Performance Nucleic Acid Analysis”, Anal. Chem., vol. 71(23), 1999, pp. 5354-5361. |
Simonian, A. L. et al., “FET based biosensors for the direct detection of organophosphate neurotoxins”, Electroanalysis, vol. 16(22), 2004, pp. 1896-1906. |
Souteyrand, E. et al., “Direct detection of the hybridization of synthetic homo-oligomer DNA sequences by field effect”, J Phys Chem B, vol. 101(15), 1997, pp. 2980-2985. |
Starodub, N. et al., “Immunosensor for the determination of the herbicide simazine based on an ion-selective field-effect transistor”, Analytica Chimica Acta, vol. 424, 2000, pp. 37-43. |
Takenaka, S. et al., “DNA Sensing on a DNA Probe-Modified Electrode Using Ferrocenylnaphthalene Dimide as the Electrochemically Active Ligand”, Anal. Chem., vol. 72(6), 2000, pp. 1334-1341. |
Tokuda, T. et al., “A CMOS image sensor with optical and potential dual imaging function for on-chip bioscientific applications”, Sensors and Actuators A, vol. 125, No. 2, 2006, 273-280. |
Tomaszewski, D. et al., “Electrical characterization of ISFETs”, J Telecomm Info Technol, 2007, pp. 55-60. |
Toumazou, C. et al., “Using transistors to linearase biochemistry”, Elect Let, vol. 43(2), 2007, p. 3. |
Truman, P. et al. “Monitoring liquid transport and chemical composition in lab on a chip systems using ion sensitive FET devices”, Lab on a Chip, vol. 6, 2006, pp. 1220-1228. |
Uslu, F. et al., “Label free fully electronic nucleic acid detection system based on a field-effect transistor device”, Biosens & Bioelectron, vol. 19(12), 2004, pp. 1723-1731. |
Van Der Wouden, E. et al., “Directional flow induced by synchronized longitudinal and zeta-potential controlling AC-electrical fields”, Lab Chip, vol. 6(10), 2006, pp. 1300-1305. |
Van Hal, R.E.G. et al., “A general model to describe the electrostatic potential at electrolyte oxide interfaces”, Advances in Colloid and Interface Science, vol. 69, 1996, pp. 31-62. |
Van Kerkhof, J. et al., “ISFET Responses on a stepwise change in electrolyte concentration at constant pH”, Sensors Actuators B: Chemical, vol. 18-19, 1994, pp. 56-59. |
Van Kerkhof, J. et al., “The ISFET based heparin sensor with a monolayer of protamine as affinity ligand”, Biosensors & Bioelectronics, vol. 10(3), 1995, pp. 269-282. |
Van Kerkhof, J., “The Development of an ISFET based heparin sensor using the ion-step measuring method”, Biosensors and Bioelectronics, 8 (9-10). pp. 463-472. |
Voigt, H. et al. “Diamond-like carbon-gate pH-ISFET” Sensors and Actuators B., vol. 44, 1997, pp. 441-445. |
Wagner, T. et al., “All-in-one solid-state device based on a light-addressable potentiometric sensor platform”, Sensors and Actuators B, vol. 117, 2006, pp. 472-479. |
Wang, W. et al., “Label-free detection of small-molecule-protein interactions by using nanowire nanosensors”, Proc. of the Natl. Acad. of Sciences (PNAS), vol. 102(9), 2005, pp. 3208-3212. |
Woias, P. et al., “Slow pH response effects of silicon nitride ISFET sensors”, Sensors and Actuators B, vol. 48, 1998, pp. 501-504. |
Woias, P., “Modeling the short time response of ISFET sensors”, Sensors and Actuators B, vol. 24-25, 1995, pp. 211-217. |
Wood, et al. “Base composition-independent hybridization in tetramethylammonium chloride: a method for oligonucleotide screening of highly complex gene libraries” Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., 1985, pp. 1585-1588. |
Wu, P. et al., “DNA and protein microarray printing on silicon nitride waveguide surfaces”, Biosensens Bioelectron, vol. 21(7), 2006, pp. 1252-1263. |
Xu, J. et al., “Analytical Aspects of FET-Based Biosensors”, Frontiers in Bioscience, vol. 10, 2005, pp. 420-430. |
Yeow, T.C.W. et al., “A very large integrated pH-ISFET sensor array chip compatible with standard CMOS processes”, Sensor and Actuators B, vol. 44, 1997, pp. 434-440. |
Yuqing, M. et al., “Ion sensitive field effect transducer-based biosensors”, Biotechnology Advances, vol. 21, 2003, pp. 527-534. |
Zhang, X. et al., “32-Channel Full Customized CMOS Biosensor Chip for Extracellular neural Signal Recording”, Proc. of the 2nd Intl. IEEE EMBs Conf. on Neural Engineering, Arlington, Virginia, 2005, pp. v-viii. |
Zhao, B. et al., “Floating-Gate Ion Sensitive Field-Effect Transistor for Chemical and Biological Sensing”, MRS Proceedings, vol. 828, 2004, pp. 349-354. |
Zhou, G. et al., “Quantitative detection of single nucleotide polymorphisms for a pooled sample by a bioluminometric assay coupled with modified primer extension reactions (BAMPER)”, Nuc. Acids Res., vol. 29(19), e93, 2001, pp. 1-11. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140264470 A1 | Sep 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61868739 | Aug 2013 | US | |
61790866 | Mar 2013 | US |