CHEMICALLY INERT ADDITIVES FOR ELECTROCHEMICAL CELLS

Information

  • Patent Application
  • 20240120543
  • Publication Number
    20240120543
  • Date Filed
    October 24, 2023
    6 months ago
  • Date Published
    April 11, 2024
    22 days ago
Abstract
A safe electrolyte which comprises a liquefied gas solvent that will transition from a liquid state to a gas state (“gas off”) at a pressure of 100 kPa and temperature of 293.15 K is further disclosed. A first mixture is formed from a first electrolyte component (one or more solvents) mixed with a second electrolyte component (one or more hydrocarbon co-solvents). The addition of the second electrolyte component (1) lowers the vapor pressure of the first mixture by at least 10% as compared to the vapor pressure of the first electrolyte component alone when measured at 293.15 K and (2) results in a vapor pressure of the first mixture above 100 kPa at a temperature of 293.15 K. The second electrolyte component may also be selected to lower the global warming potential (GWP) of the first mixture by at least 10% as compared to GWP of the first electrolyte component alone. The safe liquefied gas electrolyte is formed by mixing a third electrolyte component (one or more salts) to the first mixture. This safe liquefied gas electrolyte can then be used to manufacture an electrochemical energy storage device.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

Embodiments of the invention relate to compositions and chemical formulations of electrolytes for use in electrochemical energy devices, such as batteries and electrochemical capacitors. Devices using the compositions and methods of use of the compositions are also provided.


BACKGROUND

Electrochemical energy storage devices, such as batteries and double layer capacitors, utilize an ionic conducting electrolyte solution to carry charge between positive and negative electrodes. Typically, these electrolytes are a liquid at a standard room temperature of 293.15 K and standard pressure (approximately 1.01325 bar). The electrolyte solutions use a mixture of some amount of solvent, co-solvents, salt, and additional additives for improved device performance. There is often one primary solvent which is used to solubilize the salt and additional co-solvents which improve cell performance. For instance, a common electrolyte solvent might include ethylene carbonate for Li-ion battery cells, but additions of dimethyl carbonate, ethylene carbonate, propylene carbonate, acetonitrile, fluoroethylene carbonate, and vinyl carbonate among others might be used to improve conductivity of the electrolyte or cycle life of the cell. Liquefied gas electrolyte utilizes solvents and co-solvents which are gaseous at room temperature and room pressure but may be used as an electrolyte solvent in the liquid phase. Identifying performance enhancing co-solvents is important to improve the electrochemical performance of the liquefied gas electrolytes.


SUMMARY

Embodiments of the present disclosure relate to chemical formulations, electrolyte compositions, electrochemical devices using thereof, and methods of use thereof. Some disclosed embodiments relate to novel formulations for electrolytes comprising a liquefied gas solvent.


One embodiment relates to a rechargeable electrochemical device that includes: an ionically conducting electrolyte comprising one or more liquefied gas solvent, one or more salt, and one or more additives; a housing enclosing the ionically conducting electrolyte and structured to provide a pressurized condition to the liquefied gas solvent; and at least two conducting electrodes in contact with the ionically conducting electrolyte. The one or more solvents or co-solvents when combined may collectively also be referred to as the liquefied gas solvent. The one or more salts when combined may collectively also be referred to as the salt. The one or more additives when combined may collectively also be referred to as the additive. The solvent and the salt when combined may collectively also be referred to as the electrolyte. The solvent, the salt, and the additive, when combined may collectively also be referred to as the electrolyte.


In some embodiments, the liquefied gas solvent is capable of being placed under a compressive pressure equal to, or greater than, the liquefied gas solvent's vapor pressure at a temperature when the compressive pressure is applied, thereby keeping the liquefied gas solvent in a liquid phase. In some embodiments, the liquefied gas solvent has a vapor pressure above an atmospheric pressure of 100 kPa at a room temperature of 293.15 K— i.e., standard pressure and temperature.


In some embodiments, the liquefied gas solvent comprises one or more materials selected from the group consisting of dimethyl ether, methyl ethyl ether, fluoromethane, difluoromethane, trifluoromethane, fluoroethane, tetrafluoroethane, pentafluoroethane, 1,1-difluoroethane, 1,2-difluoroethane, 1,1,1-trifluoroethane, 1,1,2-trifluoroethane, 1,1,1,2-tetrafluoroethane, 1,1,2,2-tetrafluoroethane, pentafluoroethane, chloromethane, chloroethane, thionyl fluoride, thionyl chloride fluoride, phosphoryl fluoride, phosphoryl chloride fluoride, sulfuryl fluoride, sulfuryl chloride fluoride, 1-fluoropropane, 2-fluoropropane, 1,1-difluoropropane, 1,2-difluoropropane, 2,2-fluoropropane, 1,1,1-trifluoropropane, 1,1,2-trifluoropropane, 1,2,2-trifluoropropane, fluoroethylene, cis-1,2-fluoroethylene, 1,1-fluoroethylene, 1-fluoropropylene, 2-propylene, chlorine, chloromethane, bromine, iodine, ammonia, methyl amine, dimethyl amine, trimethyl amine, molecular oxygen, molecular nitrogen, carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, sulfur dioxide, methyl vinyl ether, difluoro ethylene, nitrous oxide, nitrogen dioxide, nitrogen oxide, carbon disulfide, hydrogen fluoride, hydrogen chloride, methane, ethane, propane, n-butane, iso-butane, cyclopropane, cyclopropane, ethene, propene, butene, cyclobutene, acetylene, isomers thereof, and a combination thereof. In some embodiments, the liquefied gas solvent comprises fluoromethane, carbon dioxide, and n-butane. In some embodiments, the liquefied gas solvent comprises fluoromethane, difluoromethane, and propane. In some embodiments, the liquefied gas solvent comprises fluoromethane, difluoromethane, carbon dioxide, and iso-butane. In some embodiments, the liquefied gas solvent comprises difluoromethane, carbon dioxide, and propene. In some embodiments, the liquefied gas solvent comprises fluoromethane, dimethyl ether, carbon dioxide, and methane. In some embodiments, the liquefied gas solvent comprises dimethyl ether and n-butane.


In some embodiments, a component of the solvent may be liquid at room temperature and atmospheric pressure such as pentane, hexane, heptane, octane, cyclopentane, cyclohexane, cycle heptane, cyclooctane, and isomers thereof.


Another embodiment relates to a rechargeable lithium battery. The rechargeable lithium battery may include an ionically conducting electrolyte. The ionically conducting electrolyte may comprise a liquefied gas solvent. The ionically conducting electrolyte may comprise one or more salt. In some embodiments, the ionically conducting electrolyte may further comprise one or more gas, liquid, or solid additives, selected from the group consisting of non-cyclic carbonate, cyclic carbonate, non-cyclic ether, cyclic ether, nitrile, phosphates, and combinations thereof. In some embodiments, the rechargeable lithium battery may also include a housing that encloses two conducting electrodes and the ionically conducting electrolyte. In some embodiments, the liquefied gas solvent has a vapor pressure above an atmospheric pressure of 100 kPa at a room temperature of 293.15 K. In some such embodiments, the liquefied gas solvent may be capable of being placed under a compressive pressure equal to, or greater than, the liquefied gas solvent's vapor pressure at a temperature when the compressive pressure is applied, thereby keeping the liquefied gas solvent in a liquid phase.


In an exemplary electrochemical device using a liquefied gas electrolyte composed of one or more liquefied gas components with any combination of one or more liquid components, one or more solid components, or one or more salt components, the electrodes are composed of any combination of two electrodes of intercalation type such as graphite, carbon, activated carbon, vanadium oxide, lithium titanate, titanium disulfide, molybdenum disulfide, lithium iron phosphate, lithium cobalt phosphate, lithium nickel phosphate, lithium cobalt oxide, lithium nickel manganese oxide, lithium nickel manganese cobalt oxide, lithium nickel cobalt aluminum oxide, carbon, or chemical reaction electrode such as with chemicals of sulfur, oxygen, carbon dioxide, nitrogen, nitrous oxide, sulfur dioxide, thionyl fluoride, thionyl chloride fluoride, sulfuryl fluoride, sulfuryl chloride fluoride, or electrostatic electrode using a high surface area electrically conducting material such as activated carbon, carbon black, carbon nanotubes, graphene, or of a metallic electrode with lithium, sodium, magnesium, tin, aluminum, calcium, titanium zinc metal or metal alloy including lithium, sodium, tin, magnesium, aluminum, calcium, titanium, zinc, or any combination thereof. These components may be combined with various binder polymer components, including polyvinylidene fluoride, carboxymethyl cellulose, styrene-butadiene rubber, or polytetrafluoroethylene in order to maintain structural integrity of the electrode.


In some embodiments, the additives are used in combination with a liquefied gas solvent and lithium, sodium, zinc, calcium, magnesium, aluminum, or titanium based salts. Further, the one or more liquefied gas solvent solution or electrolyte may be combined with one or more salts, including one or more of lithium bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide (LiTFSI), lithium hexafluorophosphate (LiPF6), lithium perchlorate (LiClO4), lithium hexafluoroarsenate (LiAsF6), lithium tetrachloroaluminate (LiAlCl4), lithium tetragaliumaluminate, lithium bis(oxalato)borate (LiBOB), lithium hexafluorostannate, lithium difluoro(oxalato)borate (LiDFOB), lithium bis(fluorosulfonyl)imide (LiFSI), lithium aluminum fluoride (LiAlF3), lithium nitrate (LiNO3), lithium chloroaluminate, lithium tetrafluoroborate (LiBF4), lithium tetrachloroaluminate, lithium difluorophosphate, lithium tetrafluoro(oxalato)phosphate, lithium difluorobis(oxalato)phosphate, lithium borate, lithium oxolate, lithium thiocyanate, lithium tetrachlorogallate, lithium chloride, lithium bromide, lithium iodide, lithium carbonate, lithium fluoride, lithium oxide, lithium hydroxide, lithium nitride, lithium super oxide, lithium azide, lithium deltate, di-lithium squarate, lithium croconate dihydrate, dilithium rhodizonate, lithium oxalate, di-lithium ketomalonate, lithium di-ketosuccinate or any corresponding salts with the positive charged lithium cation substituted for sodium or magnesium or any combinations thereof. Further useful salts include those with positively charged cations such as tetramethylammonium, tetraethylammonium, tetrapropylammonium, tetrabutylammonium, triethylmethylammonium ammonium, spiro-(1,1′)-bipyrrolidinium, 1,1-dimethylpyrrolidinium, and 1,1-diethylpyrrolidinium, N,N-diethyl-N-methyl-N(2-methoxyethyl)ammonium, N,N-Diethyl-N-methyl-N-propylammonium, N,N-dimethyl-N-ethyl-N-(3-methoxypropyl)ammonium, N,N-Dimethyl-N-ethyl-N-benzylAmmonium, N,N-Dimethyl-N-ethyl-N-phenylethylammonium, N-Ethyl-N,N-dimethyl-N-(2-methoxyethyl)ammonium, N-Tributyl-N-methylammonium, N-Trim ethyl-N-hexyl ammonium, N-Trimethyl-N-butyl ammonium, N-Trimethyl-N-propylammonium, 1,3-Dimethylimidazolium, 1-(4-Sulfobutyl)-3-methylimidazolium, 1-Allyl-3H-imidazolium, 1-Butyl-3-methylimidazolium, 1-Ethyl-3-methylimidazolium, 1-Hexyl-3-methylimidazolium, 1-Octyl-3-methylimidazolium, 3-Methyl-1-propylimidazolium, H-3-Methylimidazolium, Trihexyl(tetradecyl)phosphonium, N-Butyl-N-methylpiperidinium, N-Propyl-N-methylpiperidinium, 1-Butyl-1-Methylpyrrolidinium, 1-Methyl-1-(2-methoxyethyl)pyrrolidinium, 1-Methyl-1-(3-methoxypropyl)pyrrolidinium, 1-Methyl-1-octylpyrrolidinium, 1-Methyl-1-pentylpyrrolidinium, or N-methylpyrrolidinium paired with negatively charged anions such as acetate, bis(fluorosulfonyl)imide, bis(oxalate)borate, bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide, bromide, chloride, dicyanamide, diethyl phosphate, hexafluorophosphate, hydrogen sulfate, iodide, methanesulfonate, methyl-phophonate, tetrachloroaluminate, tetrafluoroborate, and trifluoromethanesulfonate. Alternative or additional embodiments described herein provide an electrolyte composition comprising one or more of the features of the foregoing description or of any description elsewhere herein.


A safe electrolyte which comprises a liquefied gas solvent that will transition from a liquid state to a gas state (“gas off”) at a pressure of 100 kPa and temperature of 293.15 K is further disclosed. A first mixture is formed from a first electrolyte component (one or more solvents) mixed with a second electrolyte component (one or more hydrocarbon co-solvents). The addition of the second electrolyte component (1) lowers the vapor pressure of the first mixture by at least 10% as compared to the vapor pressure of the first component alone when measured at 293.15 K; and (2) results in a vapor pressure of the first mixture above 100 kPa at a temperature of 293.15 K. The addition of the second electrolyte component may also lower the global warming potential (GWP) of the first mixture by at least 10% as compared to GWP of the first component alone. The safe liquefied gas electrolyte is formed by mixing a third electrolyte component (one or more salts) to the first mixture. This safe liquefied gas electrolyte can then be used to manufacture an electrochemical energy storage device.


Alternative or additional embodiments described herein provide a method of using the electrolyte composition or device comprising one or more of the features of the foregoing description or of any description elsewhere herein.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 compares the pressure of various liquefied gas electrolytes, Electrolyte 1: 1.0M LiTFSI and 2.0M trimethyl phosphate in 90 parts by mole fluoromethane and 10 parts by mole carbon dioxide (solid line), Electrolyte 2: 1.0M LiTFSI and 2.0M triethyl phosphate in 40 parts by mole fluoromethane, 50 parts by mole propane, and 10 parts by mole carbon dioxide (dashed line).



FIG. 2 compares the pressure of various liquefied gas electrolytes, Electrolyte 1: 1.0M LiTFSI and 2.0M trimethyl phosphate in 90 parts by mole difluoromethane and 10 parts by mole carbon dioxide (solid line), Electrolyte 2: 1.0M LiTFSI and 2.0M triethyl phosphate in 40 parts by mole difluoromethane, 50 parts by mole propane, and 10 part by mole carbon dioxide (dashed line).



FIG. 3 illustrates the performance of a battery coin cell using a lithium metal anode, stainless steel counter electrode, and an electrolyte composed of 1.0M LiTFSI and 2.0M trimethyl phosphate in 75 parts by mole fluoromethane, 15 parts by mole propane, and 10 parts by mole carbon dioxide.



FIG. 4 illustrates the performance of a battery coin cell using a lithium metal anode, stainless steel counter electrode, and an electrolyte composed of 1.0M LiTFSI and 2.0M trimethyl phosphate in 90 parts by mole fluoromethane, and 10 parts by mole carbon dioxide



FIG. 5 illustrates the electrolytic conductivity of various liquefied gas electrolytes, Electrolyte 1: 1.0M LiTFSI and 2.0M triethyl phosphate in 40 parts by mole fluoromethane, 50 parts by mole propane, and 10 parts by mole carbon dioxide, Electrolyte 2: 1.0M LiTFSI and 2.0M triethyl phosphate in 40 parts by mole difluoromethane, 50 parts by mole propane, and 10 parts by mole carbon dioxide, Electrolyte 3: 1.0M LiTFSI and 2.0M fluoroethylene carbonate in 45 parts by mole difluoromethane, 45 parts by mole fluoromethane, and 10 parts by mole carbon dioxide.



FIG. 6 illustrates the performance of a battery coin cell using a lithium metal anode, graphite cathode, and an electrolyte composed of 1.0M LiTFSI and 2.0M trimethyl phosphate in 40 parts by mole fluoromethane, 50 parts by mole propane, and 10 parts by mole carbon dioxide.



FIG. 7 illustrates the performance of a battery coin cell using a lithium metal anode, graphite cathode, and an electrolyte composed of 1.0M LiTFSI and 1.0M trimethyl phosphate in 45 parts by mole difluoromethane, 45 parts by mole fluoromethane, and 10 parts by mole carbon dioxide.



FIG. 8 illustrates the performance of a battery coin cell using a lithium metal anode, lithium-nickel-manganese oxide (NMC622) cathode, and an electrolyte composed of 1.0M LiTFSI and 2.0M trimethyl phosphate in 90 parts by mole fluoromethane, and 10 parts by mole carbon dioxide.



FIG. 9 illustrates the performance of a battery coin cell using a lithium metal anode, lithium-nickel-manganese oxide (NMC622) cathode, and an electrolyte composed of 1.0M LiTFSI and 2.0M trimethyl phosphate in 80 parts by mole fluoromethane, 10 parts by mole iso-butane, and 10 parts by mole carbon dioxide.



FIG. 10 illustrates the performance of a battery coin cell using a lithium metal anode, lithium-nickel-manganese oxide (NMC622) cathode, and an electrolyte composed of 1.0M LiTFSI and 2.0M trimethyl phosphate in 80 parts by mole fluoromethane, 10 parts by mole n-butane, and 10 parts by mole carbon dioxide.



FIG. 11 illustrates the performance of a battery coin cell using a lithium metal anode, lithium-nickel-manganese oxide (NMC622) cathode, and an electrolyte composed of 1.0M LiTFSI and 2.0M trimethyl phosphate in 70 parts by mole difluoromethane, 20 parts by mole n-butane, and 10 parts by mole carbon dioxide.



FIG. 12 illustrates the performance of a battery coin cell using a lithium metal anode, lithium-nickel-manganese oxide (NMC622) cathode, and an electrolyte composed of 1.0M LiTFSI and 2.0M triethyl phosphate in 40 parts by mole fluoromethane, 50 parts by mole propane, and 10 parts by mole carbon dioxide.



FIG. 13 illustrates the performance of a battery coin cell using a lithium metal anode, lithium-nickel-manganese oxide (NMC622) cathode, and an electrolyte composed of 1.0M LiTFSI and 2.0M triethyl phosphate in 40 parts by mole fluoromethane, 50 parts by mole propene, and 10 parts by mole carbon dioxide.



FIG. 14 illustrates the performance of a battery coin cell using a lithium metal anode, lithium-nickel-manganese oxide (NMC622) cathode, and an electrolyte composed of 1.0M LiTFSI and 2.0M triethyl phosphate in 35 parts by mole difluoromethane, 60 parts by mole propane, and 5 parts by mole carbon dioxide.



FIG. 15 illustrates the performance of two battery coin cells using a lithium metal anode, lithium-nickel-manganese oxide (NMC622) cathode, and varying electrolytes, Electrolyte 1: 1.0M LiTFSI and 2.0M trimethyl phosphate (TMP) in 90 parts by mole fluoromethane, and 10 parts by mole carbon dioxide, Electrolyte 2: 1.0M LiTFSI and 2.0M triethyl phosphate in 35 parts by mole difluoromethane, 60 parts by mole propane, and 5 parts by mole carbon dioxide.



FIG. 16 illustrates the vapor pressure of three electrolytes containing either 0.0, 0.1, 0.5, 1.0, or 1.5M LiTFSI salt, further demonstrating that the salt concentration shows no change in the vapor pressure of the electrolyte, or well within the uncertainty of the measurement.



FIG. 17 presents voltage and temperature data of a 2 Ah cell as the cell is heated.



FIG. 18 presents voltage and temperature data of a 2 Ah cell as the cell is overcharged.



FIG. 19 presents voltage and temperature data of a 2 Ah cell as the cell is crushed.



FIG. 20A presents a method for constructing an electrochemical energy storage device with a safe liquefied gas electrolyte.



FIG. 20B presents an alternate method for constructing an electrochemical energy storage device with a safe liquefied gas electrolyte.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Reference is made herein to some specific examples of the present invention, including any best modes contemplated by the inventor for carrying out the invention. Examples of these specific embodiments are illustrated in the accompanying figures. While the invention is described in conjunction with these specific embodiments, it will be understood that they are not intended to limit the invention to the described or illustrated embodiments. To the contrary, they are intended to cover alternatives, modifications, and equivalents as may be included within the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.


In the following description, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the present invention. Particular example embodiments of the present invention may be implemented without some or all of these specific details. In other instances, process operations well-known to persons of skill in the art have not been described in detail so as not to obscure unnecessarily the present invention. Various techniques and mechanisms of the present invention will sometimes be described in singular form for clarity. However, it should be noted that some embodiments include multiple iterations of a technique or multiple mechanisms, unless noted otherwise. Similarly, various steps of the methods shown and described herein are not necessarily performed in the order indicated, or performed at all, in certain embodiments. Accordingly, some implementations of the methods discussed herein may include more or fewer steps than those shown or described. Further, the techniques and mechanisms of the present invention will sometimes describe a connection, relationship or communication between two or more entities. It should be noted that a connection or relationship between entities does not necessarily mean a direct, unimpeded connection, as a variety of other entities or processes may reside or occur between any two entities. Consequently, an indicated connection does not necessarily mean a direct, unimpeded connection, unless otherwise noted.


Electrochemical energy storage devices, such as batteries and double layer capacitors, utilize an ionic conducting electrolyte solution to carry charge between positive and negative electrodes. Typically, these electrolytes are a liquid at a standard room temperature of 293.15 K and standard pressure (approximately 1.01325 bar). The electrolyte solutions use a mixture of some amount of solvent, co-solvents, one or more salts, and one or more additional additives for improved device performance. There is often one primary solvent which is used to solubilize the salt and additional co-solvents which improve cell performance. For instance, a common electrolyte solvent might include ethylene carbonate for Li-ion battery cells, but additions of dimethyl carbonate, ethylene carbonate, propylene carbonate, acetonitrile, fluoroethylene carbonate, and vinyl carbonate among others might be used to improve conductivity of the electrolyte or cycle life of the cell. Liquefied gas electrolytes utilize solvents and co-solvents which are gaseous at room temperature and room pressure but may be used as an electrolyte solvent in the liquid phase, either by decreasing the temperature or by holding the solvent under its own vapor pressure. Identifying performance enhancing co-solvents is important to improve the electrochemical performance of the liquefied gas electrolytes.


Liquefied gas electrolytes may use fluoromethane or difluoromethane as a primary solvent to solubilize salts in electrochemical devices such as lithium batteries or electrochemical capacitors. However, these solvents typically have high vapor pressures and high global warming potential (GWP). For instance, at a room temperature of 293.15 K, the vapor pressure of fluoromethane and difluoromethane is around 493 and 214 psi, respectively. The GWP (global warming potential, a multiple of carbon dioxides global warming potential) of fluoromethane and difluoromethane is around 92 and 675, respectively. It would be beneficial to operate an electrochemical device cell with a lower pressure, a lower GWP, or both. A lower pressure would lower the mechanical packaging burden by using thinner metal housings to place the cell and contain the liquefied gas electrolyte. A lower GWP would be more environmentally friendly.


Ideally liquefied gas electrolytes would use co-solvents that, in addition to lowering pressure, lowering GWP, or both, would be chemically beneficial to the performance of the cell. Often co-solvents which are beneficial in forming solid electrolyte interphases (SEI) on either the anode or cathode are identified. However, chemically inert co-solvents would also be beneficial in that it lowers the chemical reactions within the cell between electrolyte and electrodes which may degrade cell performance.


Because of the high reactivity of lithium metal, it is difficult to use as an anode in high energy lithium battery cells. Though lithium metal has a high capacity to weight ratio, it suffers from a high rate of reactivity with the electrolyte. During cell cycling, the SEI layer on the surface of lithium metal may crack and expose fresh lithium metal which will react with the electrolyte, lowering the efficiency of the cell and lowering the cycle life. It would be beneficial to have an electrolyte whose solvent has lower reactivity with lithium metal to increase cell efficiency and cycle life. Similar to lithium batteries, sodium, zinc, magnesium, aluminum, and potassium or their alloys may all be used inside a battery as electrode and would benefit from a lower reacting electrolyte solvent.


Some chemically inert co-solvents may include hydrocarbon solvents. Hydrocarbon solvents have very low electrochemical reactivity and are stable. These hydrocarbon solvents may include methane, ethane, propane, n-butane, iso-butane, cyclopropane, cyclopropane, ethene, propene, butene, cyclobutene, cyclobutene, acetylene, pentane, hexane, heptane, octane, cyclopentane, cyclohexane, cycloheptane, cyclooctane, isomers thereof, and a combination thereof. In some embodiments, the liquefied gas solvent comprises fluoromethane, carbon dioxide, and n-butane. In some embodiments, the liquefied gas solvent comprises fluoromethane, difluoromethane, and propane. In some embodiments, the liquefied gas solvent comprises fluoromethane, difluoromethane, carbon dioxide, and iso-butane. In some embodiments, the liquefied gas solvent comprises difluoromethane, carbon dioxide, and propene. In some embodiments, the liquefied gas solvent comprises fluoromethane, dimethyl ether, carbon dioxide, and methane. In some embodiments, the liquefied gas solvent comprises dimethyl ether and n-butane.


Because of their low chemical reactivity, highly reactive alkali or alkaline metals, such as sodium and lithium metal are often transported in hydrocarbon solvents or mineral oil, which is a mixture of long chained hydrocarbon solvents. Other highly reactive compounds such as butyl lithium are also stored in hydrocarbon solvents such as hexanes.


Hydrocarbon solvents which may be used in liquefied gas electrolytes may include saturated or unsaturated hydrocarbons. This may include alkanes, alkenes, or alkylenes. This may further include hydrocarbons which are gaseous or non-gaseous at a standard room temperature of 293.15 K and standard pressure (approximately 1.01325 bar).


The use of hydrocarbon solvents in liquefied gas electrolytes may improve electrolyte properties such as lower vapor pressure, lower GWP, and higher chemical stability. This is because many of the hydrocarbon liquefied gas solvents have vapor pressures lower than other liquefied gas solvents (ex., fluoromethane, carbon dioxide). Further, hydrocarbon solvents have GWPs close to zero, which may substantially lower the GWP of the full electrolyte. Lastly, adding hydrocarbon solvents to the electrolyte will help improve chemical stability of the full electrolyte solution by lowering the amount of the more chemical active species in the electrolyte.


Lowering the pressure of the liquefied gas electrolyte can be beneficial from a mechanical design point of view. With an electrolyte with too high of a vapor pressure, the cell housing may need thicker walls to support the pressure since the thicker walls impart an added strength onto the cell housing. The cell housing will require the thicker walls to ensure good sealing and no leakage during the life of the cell. The thicker walls less desirable characteristics such as added volume, mass, and cost to the cell. Alternatively, stronger metals might be used with thinner walls, such as stainless steel, titanium, but at an added cost to the cell. Thus, lowering the vapor pressure of the electrolyte can have beneficial properties. The less stringent requirements on the mechanical cell housings may be achieved with a reduced vapor pressure of the liquefied gas electrolyte having a vapor pressure around 100 kPa, or more desirably, a vapor pressure between 100 kPa and 100 MPa, or more desirably 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5, 0.6, 0.7, 0.8, 0.9, 1, 1.2, 1.3, 1.4, 1.5, 1.6, 1.7, 1.8, 1.9, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 MPa at a room temperature of 293.15 K.


It has been found that having a pressurized electrolyte system can also be beneficial to the electrochemical device for several reasons. During standard manufacturing with a liquid based electrolyte, a cell is first put into a vacuum state followed by liquid electrolyte injection into the cell takes places and is followed by several hours of waiting for the cell to completely wet on all electrode and separator surfaces. Often the cell undergoes a first electrolyte injection step, followed by a wait time to allow for electrolyte wetting, followed by a second electrolyte injection step to ensure full wettability. Until full wetting takes place, the cell is not ready to be charged. Moreover, a cell that is not fully wetted is a leading cause of scrap rate in the manufacturing process, which necessitates a higher cost of cells. With a pressurized liquefied gas electrolyte, the cell is rapidly wetted due to the high pressure of the electrolyte penetrating all surfaces of the electrodes and separator. This wetting process takes place in seconds as opposed to hours, reducing manufacturing time and cost. Further, this allows for higher confidence in a fully wetted cell and reduces scrap rate, thus reducing overall cost of the cell manufacturing. The wetting process can be enhanced by using pressurized electrolytes having a vapor pressure around 100 kPa, or more desirably, a vapor pressure between 100 kPa and 100 MPa, or more desirably around 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5, 0.6, 0.7, 0.8, 0.9, 1, 1.2, 1.3, 1.4, 1.5, 1.6, 1.7, 1.8, 1.9, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 MPa at a room temperature of 293.15 K.


Another beneficial property to having a pressurized electrolyte is reduced risk of safety hazards from physical or electrical cell abuse. In common Li-ion battery cells, it is common to see thermal runaway reactions under physical or electrical abuse such as over temperature, over charge, crush, nail penetration, or short circuit event. This is due to exothermic reactions within the cell that may be triggered at relatively low temperatures, ex. around +100° C. This “thermal runaway onset temperature” triggers these additional exothermic reactions which can then drive a cell to catch fire and explode causing a serious safety and health concern. Moreover, the heat generated from one cell may also propagate to an adjacent cell and trigger that cell to also go into thermal runaway and create a thermal propagation event across the battery pack. The flammable liquid electrolyte is generally the critical component driving these thermal runaway reactions. Once the cell warms up to the auto-combustion temperature of the electrolyte, explosive reactions may occur. Moreover, a short-circuited cell requires both an electrical and ionic pathway between the anode and cathode. The electrolyte carries the ions within the cell, and thus contributes to cell short circuit.


In contrast, a pressurized liquefied gas electrolyte system carries the safety advantage in that under physical or electrical abuse, the cell may warm up to a pre-determined venting temperature at which time the cell is allowed to vent the pressurized liquefied gas solvent or liquefied gas electrolyte to atmosphere, leaving behind a “dry cell” without any flammable or ionically conducting electrolyte. Once vented, the cell is allowed to fail safely without any thermal runaway reactions occurring. For example, under over temperature conditions, the cell might be warmed up to +240° C. Before reaching the +200° C. temperature, the cell may cross a vent temperature at which point the vapor pressure of the liquefied gas electrolyte within the cell reaches a pressure high enough to cause a vent engineered on the cell to open and release pressure and the electrolyte material. A vent temperature, ex., +80° C., below the thermal runaway temperature, ex. +100° C. is ideal, so that the flammable electrolyte may vent away from the cell prior to any thermal runaway reactions occurring and allowing the cell to fail safely even at temperatures as high as +240 C. Similarly, a cell may be overcharged, and during the overcharge event warm up. When the cell reaches the vent temperature, the liquefied gas electrolyte will be released from the cell and the cell will fail safely. Similarly, during a short circuit event, the cell may warm up rapidly due to the high discharge current. When the cell warms to the vent temperature, the liquefied gas electrolyte may be allowed to vent from the cell and the cell can fail safely rather than go into thermal runaway. A cell using the liquefied gas electrolyte may also fail safely without a temperature triggered vent. For example, during a crush or a projectile penetration event, the cell housing may fracture and allow the pressurized liquefied gas electrolyte to vent from the cell to atmosphere through the fractured housing while maintaining a cell temperature close to a room temperature of about 293.15K. With a conventional liquid electrolyte being used in the cell, it is a high probability that the cell can short circuit during a crush or projectile penetration event and overheat causing the cell to go into thermal runaway. With the liquefied gas electrolyte (including those that have a vapor pressure over 100 kPa at a room temperature of about 293.15K), the venting or gassing off of the electrolyte to atmosphere through a fractured cell housing allows the cell to fail safely regardless of a potential short circuit event.


In all scenarios, it is highly desirable to have rapid venting of all the liquefied gas electrolyte from the cell under a physical or electrical abuse condition to minimize likely hood of any thermal runaway event. To lower the time it takes for the liquefied gas electrolyte to vent from the cell, a higher vapor pressure electrolyte is desirable. Too low of a vapor pressure electrolyte and the electrolyte may not vent from the cell rapidly enough to prevent thermal runaway or the electrolyte from reaching auto-ignition and ignite and cause a fire hazard. Further, upon venting, the cell may lower in temperature due to the heat of evaporation caused by the liquefied gas phase changing from a liquid to a gaseous state. If the cell drops in temperature sufficiently, it may lower the vapor pressure enough such that the venting of the electrolyte from the cell stops and can create an additional hazard. Thus, it is desirable that the liquefied gas electrolyte have a vapor pressure sufficient to vent from the cell rapidly. This vapor pressure of the electrolyte can thus be around 100 kPa, or more desirably, a vapor pressure between 100 kPa and 100 MPa, or more desirably around 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5, 0.6, 0.7, 0.8, 0.9, 1, 1.2, 1.3, 1.4, 1.5, 1.6, 1.7, 1.8, 1.9, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 MPa at a room temperature of 293.15 K. It should be understood that the cell may vent the entire contents of the liquefied gas electrolyte containing any gaseous, liquid, or solid components, or just the liquefied gas solvent and liquid components, or just the liquefied gas solvent components, or any combination of partial components from the cell. Even a partial venting of the electrolyte can results in a cell failing safely under physical or electrical abuse conditions.


There are benefits to both a reduced and increased vapor pressure electrolyte. A reduced vapor pressure liquefied gas electrolyte can lower mechanical housing requirements and allow for a lower mass, lower volume, and lower cost cell. A higher vapor pressure liquefied gas electrolyte improves cell wettability during manufacturing, reducing manufacturing time, cost, and scrap rate as well as improving cell safety under physical or electrical abuse such as during an over temperature, over charge, crush, nail penetration, or short circuit event. Thus, it is through careful experimentation that a liquefied gas electrolyte may be optimized to have an ideal vapor pressure which is not too high and not too low for optimized cell performance. This experimentation might start with a liquefied gas solvent such as dimethyl ether, methyl ethyl ether, fluoromethane, difluoromethane, trifluoromethane, fluoroethane, tetrafluoroethane, pentafluoroethane, 1,1-difluoroethane, 1,2-difluoroethane, 1,1,1-trifluoroethane, 1,1,2-trifluoroethane, 1,1,1,2-tetrafluoroethane, 1,1,2,2-tetrafluoroethane, pentafluoroethane, chloromethane, chloroethane, thionyl fluoride, thionyl chloride fluoride, phosphoryl fluoride, phosphoryl chloride fluoride, sulfuryl fluoride, sulfuryl chloride fluoride, 1-fluoropropane, 2-fluoropropane, 1,1-difluoropropane, 1,2-difluoropropane, 2,2-fluoropropane, 1,1,1-trifluoropropane, 1,1,2-trifluoropropane, 1,2,2-trifluoropropane, fluoroethylene, cis-1,2-fluoroethylene, 1,1-fluoroethylene, 1-fluoropropylene, 2-propylene, chlorine, chloromethane, bromine, iodine, ammonia, methyl amine, dimethyl amine, trimethyl amine, molecular oxygen, molecular nitrogen, carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, sulfur dioxide, methyl vinyl ether, difluoro ethylene, nitrous oxide, nitrogen dioxide, nitrogen oxide, carbon disulfide, hydrogen fluoride, hydrogen, and isomers thereof, and combinations thereof, and with the addition of a hydrocarbon solvent to lower or increase the vapor pressure to optimize the cell performance. The addition of the hydrocarbon solvent may modify the liquefied gas electrolyte vapor pressure to achieve a vapor pressure of around 100 kPa, or more desirably, a vapor pressure between 100 kPa and 100 MPa, or more desirably around 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5, 0.6, 0.7, 0.8, 0.9, 1, 1.2, 1.3, 1.4, 1.5, 1.6, 1.7, 1.8, 1.9, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 MPa at a room temperature of 293.15 K. This might equate to a vapor pressure increase or decrease of 0.1% to 99.9% at any temperature from 1 K to 1000 K of the liquefied gas electrolyte. More desirably, the increase or decrease of the liquefied electrolyte vapor pressure might be around 0.1, 1, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 55, 59, 60, 61, 65, 70, 75, 80, 90, 95, 99, or 99.9% at a room temperature of 293.15 K.


Hydrocarbons are an ideal material to use since they impart improved chemical stability to the electrolyte and are relatively cheap. However, it is noted that addition of any hydrocarbon to the liquefied gas electrolyte will always impart some flammability to the liquefied gas electrolyte system. This often leads to a less desirable lower flash point (lowest temperature which a material's vapor may ignite) of the electrolyte due to the generally low flash point of hydrocarbons. Even with the lower flash point with addition of these hydrocarbons to the liquefied gas electrolyte, the improved characteristics, such as improved safety, manufacturability, performance, lower GWP, etc., discussed above impart highly desirable aspects which are desired in the industry today.


The mass ratio of the hydrocarbon solvent the liquefied gas electrolyte solvent may be anywhere from 0.01 part in a hundred to 99.99 parts in a hundred by mass or by molar ratio when compared to the rest of the electrolyte. It is only found through considerable experimentation the ratio of solvent, hydrocarbon co-solvent, salt, and one or more additives in order to enhance solubility, minimize phase separation, maximize conductivity, and maximize cell performance. The addition of the hydrocarbon solvent may also benefit the electrolyte through a lower the vapor pressure or lower the GWP while maintaining the same cell performance as an electrolyte without the addition of a hydrocarbon solvent.


Adding a non-polar solvent, such as a hydrocarbon, into an electrolyte can lower the overall solubility of the electrolyte. Several studies were conducted to determine which hydrocarbons and in what percent can be added to an electrolyte to optimize salt solubility. Other parameters, such as phase separation (where there is clear separation in a high density and low density regions in the fluid), vapor pressure, and GWP are recorded in Table 1. Stainless steel cells with glass windows were assembled containing various electrolytes, allowing the study of salt solubility in various electrolyte formulations. Table 1 below presents the observed solubility for various electrolyte formulations at 293.15K. As expected, due to the non-polar nature of hydrocarbon solvents lithium salts have difficulty solubilizing even with enhancing additives. However, when used as a co-solvent in a mixture containing fluoromethane, difluoromethane, or both fluoromethane and difluoromethane salt solubility is enhanced. It has previously been noted that phase separation can occur in various combinations of liquefied gas electrolytes indicative of poor miscibility of the salt, additive, and solvent system. These solubility experiments highlight that carful control of the salt solvation structure is key to creating an electrolyte mixture with high salt solubility and no phase separation. In doing so, the ratio of hydrocarbon solvent can be tuned and demonstrated from 0.01 to 99.99 percent of the solvent mixture. Table 1 uses 1M of salt as standard for purposes of a fixed salt concentration, however, high or lower concentrations have been carefully explored and salt solubilities from 0.001 to 5M have been observed with varying results. However, it was noted that under no concentration of salt was salt seen to be soluble in any solvent comprised of only one or more hydrocarbon solvents. Further, with mixture of a solvent comprised of only one or more hydrocarbon-based solvents and liquid additives to improve salt solubility, it was consistently observed that there was no salt solubility or strong phase separation. Further, with mixture of a solvent comprised of only one or more hydrocarbon-based solvents and salt and with or without liquid additives to improve salt solubility, it was consistently observed there was no lowering of the vapor pressure relative to the pure solvent comprised of only one or more hydrocarbon solvent.
















TABLE 1











Pressure at
GWP


Salt

Additive

Solvent Mixture

293.15 K
(CO2


Concentration
Salt
Concentration
Additive
(Molar Ratio)
Solubility
(psi)
eq./kg)






















1.0M
LiTFSI
1.0M
Trimethyl
Fluoromethane (100)
Soluble, No Phase
531
105





phosphate

Separation


1.0M
LiTFSI
1.0M
Triethylene
Difluoromethane (100)
Soluble, No Phase
223
677





glycol

Separation





dimethyl





ether


1.0M
LiTFSI


Iso-Butane (100)
Not Soluble
45
<10


1.0M
LiTFSI


Methane (100)
Not Soluble
1000
<10


1.0M
LiTFSI


Ethane (100)
Not Soluble
540
<10


1.0M
LiTFSI


Propane (100)
Not Soluble
122
<10


1.0M
LiTFSI


n-Butane (100)
Not Soluble
16
<10


1.0M
LiTFSI


Ethene
Not Soluble
1000
<10


1.0M
LiTFSI


Propene
Not Soluble
145
<10


1.0M
LiTFSI


Acetylene
Not Soluble
635
<10


1.0M
LiPF6


Iso-Butane (100)
Not Soluble
45
<10


1.0M
LiPF6


Methane (100)
Not Soluble
1000
<10


1.0M
LiPF6


Ethane (100)
Not Soluble
540
<10


1.0M
LiPF6


Propane (100)
Not Soluble
122
<10


1.0M
LiPF6


n-Butane (100)
Not Soluble
16
<10


1.0M
LiPF6


Ethene
Not Soluble
1000
<10


1.0M
LiPF6


Propene
Not Soluble
145
<10


1.0M
LiPF6


Acetylene
Not Soluble
635
<10


1.0M
LiTFSI
1.0M
Trimethyl
Iso-Butane (100)
Not Soluble
45
3





phosphate


1.0M
LiTFSI
2.0M
Trimethyl
Iso-Butane (100)
Not Soluble
45
3





phosphate


1.0M
LiTFSI
2.0M
Trimethyl
Fluoromethane:Iso-
Soluble, No Phase
486
93





phosphate
Butane:Carbon Dioxide
Separation






(80:10:10)


1.0M
LiTFSI
2.0M
Trimethyl
Fluoromethane:n-
Soluble, Phase
438
82





phosphate
Butane:Carbon Dioxide
Separation






(70:20:10)


1.0M
LiTFSI
2.0M
Trimethyl
Difluoromethane:n-
Soluble, No Phase
246
475





phosphate
Butane:Carbon Dioxide
Separation






(70:20:10)


1.0M
LiTFSI
2.0M
Sulfolane
Fluoromethane:Pro-
Soluble, Phase
419
71






pane:Carbon Dioxide
Separation






(60:30:10)


1.0M
LiTFSI
2.0M
Ethylene
Fluoromethane:Pro-
Soluble, Phase
419
71





carbonate
pane:Carbon Dioxide
Separation






(60:30:10)


1.0M
LiTFSI
2.0M
Dimethyl
Fluoromethane:Pro-
Soluble, Phase
419
71





carbonate
pane:Carbon Dioxide
Separation






(60:30:10)


1.0M
LiTFSI
2.0M
Triethylene
Fluoromethane:Pro-
Soluble, Phase
419
71





glycol
pane:Carbon Dioxide
Separation





dimethyl
(60:30:10)





ether


1.0M
LiTFSI
2.0M
Triethyl
Fluoromethane:Pro-
Soluble, No Phase
419
71





phosphate
pane:Carbon Dioxide
Separation






(60:30:10)


1.0M
LiTFSI
2.0M
Triethyl
Fluoromethane:Pro-
Soluble, No Phase
345
48





phosphate
pane:Carbon Dioxide
Separation






(40:50:10)


1.0M
LiTFSI
2.0M
Triethyl
Fluoromethane:Pro-
Soluble, No Phase
358
47





phosphate
pene:Carbon Dioxide
Separation






(40:50:10)


1.0M
LiTFSI
2.0M
Triethyl
Difluoromethane:Pro-
Soluble, No Phase
195
238





phosphate
pane:Carbon Dioxide
Separation






(35:60:5)


1.0M
LiTFSI
2.0M
Triethyl
Difluoromethane:Pro-
Soluble, No Phase
211
237





phosphate
pene:Carbon Dioxide
Separation






(35:60:5)


1.0M
LiTFSI
2.0M
Triethyl
Fluoromethane:Pro-
Soluble, No Phase
288
23





phosphate
pene:Carbon Dioxide
Separation






(20:70:10)


1.0M
LiTFSI
2.0M
Triethyl
Difluoromethane:Pro-
Soluble, No Phase
188
34





phosphate
pene:Carbon Dioxide
Separation






(5:90:5)









Because of the high reactivity of lithium metal, it is difficult to use as an anode in high energy lithium battery cells. To demonstrate the advantage of including chemically inert co-solvents such as hydrocarbon solvents, Li metal was stored in various solvent and electrolyte mixtures for 24 hours and visually inspected for deleterious side reactions. Similar to liquid hydrocarbon analogues (i.e. hexane), lithium metal can be stored in liquefied gas hydrocarbon solvents and liquefied gas based electrolytes including hydrocarbons as a co-solvent without any deleterious side reactions. Observations of lithium metal after soaking in various solvents and electrolytes at 293.15K for 24 hours is shown in Table 2.














TABLE 2










Li Metal


Salt

Additive

Solvent Mixture
Observation After


Concentration
Salt
Concentration
Additive
(Molar Ratio)
Soaking











Fluoromethane (100)
Surface Reaction






Hexane
No Reaction






Propane
No Reaction






Propene
No Reaction


1.0M
LiTFSI
2.0M
Trimethyl
Difluoromethane:Fluoro-
No Reaction





phosphate
methane:Propane:Carbon






Dioxide (10:65:10:15)


1.0M
LiTFSI
2.0M
Triethyl
Fluoromethane:Pro-
No Reaction





phosphate
pane:Carbon Dioxide






(80:10:10)


1.0M
LiTFSI
2.0M
Triethyl
Fluoromethane:Pro-
No Reaction





phosphate
pane:Carbon Dioxide






(40:50:10)









In an exemplary electrochemical device using a liquefied gas electrolyte composed of one or more liquefied gas components with any combination of one or more liquid components, one or more solid components, or one or more salt components, the electrodes are composed of any combination of two electrodes of intercalation type such as graphite, carbon, activated carbon, lithium titanate, titanium disulfide, molybdenum disulfide, lithium iron phosphate, lithium cobalt phosphate, lithium nickel phosphate, lithium cobalt oxide, lithium nickel manganese oxide, lithium nickel manganese cobalt oxide, lithium nickel cobalt aluminum oxide or chemical reaction electrode such as with chemicals of sulfur, oxygen, carbon dioxide, nitrogen, nitrous oxide, sulfur dioxide, thionyl fluoride, thionyl chloride fluoride, sulfuryl fluoride, sulfuryl chloride fluoride or of a metallic electrode with lithium, sodium, magnesium, tin, aluminum, zinc metal or metal alloy including lithium, sodium, tin, magnesium, aluminum, zinc, or any combination thereof. These components may be combined with various binder polymer components, including polyvinylidene fluoride, carboxymethyl cellulose, styrene-butadiene rubber, or polytetrafluoroethylene in order to maintain structural integrity of the electrode.


Further, the one or more liquefied gas solvent solution or electrolyte may be combined with one or more salts, including one or more of lithium bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide (LiTFSI), lithium hexafluorophosphate (LiPF6), lithium perchlorate (LiClO4), lithium hexafluoroarsenate (LiAsF6), lithium tetrachloroaluminate (LiAlC14), lithium tetragaliumaluminate, lithium bis(oxalato)borate (LiBOB), lithium hexafluorostannate, lithium difluoro(oxalato)borate (LiDFOB), lithium bis(fluorosulfonyl)imide (LiFSI), lithium aluminum fluoride (LiAlF3), lithium nitrate (LiNO3), lithium chloroaluminate, lithium tetrafluoroborate (LiBF4), lithium tetrachloroaluminate, lithium difluorophosphate, lithium tetrafluoro(oxalato)phosphate, lithium difluorobis(oxalato)phosphate, lithium borate, lithium oxolate, lithium thiocyanate, lithium tetrachlorogallate, lithium chloride, lithium bromide, lithium iodide, lithium carbonate, lithium fluoride, lithium oxide, lithium hydroxide, lithium nitride, lithium super oxide, lithium azide, lithium deltate, di-lithium squarate, lithium croconate dihydrate, dilithium rhodizonate, lithium oxalate, di-lithium ketomalonate, lithium di-ketosuccinate or any corresponding salts with the positive charged lithium cation substituted for sodium or magnesium or any combinations thereof. Further useful salts include those with positively charged cations such as tetramethylammonium, tetraethylammonium, tetrapropylammonium, tetrabutyl ammonium, triethylmethylammonium ammonium, spiro-(1,1′)-bipyrrolidinium, 1,1-dimethylpyrrolidinium, and 1,1-diethylpyrrolidinium, N,N-diethyl-N-methyl-N(2-methoxyethyl)ammonium, N,N-Diethyl-N-methyl-N-propylammonium, N,N-dimethyl-N-ethyl-N-(3-methoxypropyl)ammonium, N,N-Dimethyl-N-ethyl-N-benzylAmmonium, N,N-Dimethyl-N-ethyl-N-phenylethylammonium, N-Ethyl-N,N-dimethyl-N-(2-methoxyethyl)ammonium, N-Tributyl-N-methyl ammonium, N-Trimethyl-N-hexylammonium, N-Trimethyl-N-butylammonium, N-Trimethyl-N-propylammonium, 1,3-Dimethylimidazolium, 1-(4-Sulfobutyl)-3-methylimidazolium, 1-Allyl-3H-imidazolium, 1-Butyl-3-methylimidazolium, 1-Ethyl-3-methylimidazolium, 1-Hexyl-3-methylimidazolium, 1-Octyl-3-methylimidazolium, 3-Methyl-1-propylimidazolium, H-3-Methylimidazolium, Trihexyl(tetradecyl)phosphonium, N-Butyl-N-methylpiperidinium, N-Propyl-N-methylpiperidinium, 1-Butyl-1-Methylpyrrolidinium, 1-Methyl-1-(2-methoxyethyl)pyrrolidinium, 1-Methyl-1-(3-methoxypropyl)pyrrolidinium, 1-Methyl-1-octylpyrrolidinium, 1-Methyl-1-pentylpyrrolidinium, or N-methylpyrrolidinium paired with negatively charged anions such as acetate, bis(fluorosulfonyl)imide, bis(oxalate)borate, bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide, bromide, chloride, dicyanamide, diethyl phosphate, hexafluorophosphate, hydrogen sulfate, iodide, methanesulfonate, methyl-phophonate, tetrachloroaluminate, tetrafluoroborate, and trifluoromethanesulfonate.


Example 1

Replacing a portion of fluoromethane in a battery cell with a hydrocarbon co-solvent, such as propane, would have a beneficial effect on the cell such as having lower vapor pressure and GWP, as shown in FIG. 1 (fluoromethane) and FIG. 2 (difluoromethane). Pressure measurements were conducted on various electrolyte formulations. The electrolyte with the hydrocarbon solvent (propane) is shown to have a lower vapor pressure and lower GWP than fluoromethane without the hydrocarbon co-solvent. Specifically, the GWP of the electrolyte mixture was reduced by 54% compared to fluoromethane without the hydrocarbon co-solvent. Also, the vapor pressure of the electrolyte mixture was reduced by 40% (at 293.15K) and by 45% (at 313.15K) compared to fluoromethane without the hydrocarbon co-solvent. This is shown in FIG. 1. Similarly, the GWP of the electrolyte mixture was reduced by 44% compared to di-fluoromethane without the hydrocarbon co-solvent. Also, the vapor pressure of the electrolyte mixture was reduced by 15% (at 293.15K) and by 28% (at 313.15K) compared to di-fluoromethane without the hydrocarbon co-solvent. This is shown in FIG. 2.


GWP is measured as CO2 equivalents per mass (CO2 eq/kg). Addition of one or more hydrocarbon solvents with low or zero GWP to the first electrolyte mixture with a higher GWP will lower the over GWP of the final mixture by dilution of the GWP over a larger mass of final electrolyte. Lowering GWP effect can be fine-tuned by adjusting the amount of hydrocarbon co-solvent or by changing the type of hydrocarbon co-solvent used. Other hydrocarbon co-solvents that may be used include: methane, ethane, propane, n-butane, iso-butane, cyclopropane, cyclopropane, ethene, propene, butene, cyclobutane, cyclobutene, acetylene, pentane, hexane, heptane, octane, cyclopentane, cyclohexane, cycloheptane, cyclooctane, isomers thereof, and a combination thereof. Preferably the amount and type of hydrocarbon solvent used lowers the GWP of the mixture (i.e. solvent plus co-solvent) by at least 10% compared to the solvent without the hydrocarbon co-solvent.


The improvement in lowering the vapor pressure increases across the operational temperature range of the electrochemical energy storage device, which significantly reduces the pressure requirement for the cell housing. Thicker cell walls are less desirable because they add volume, mass, and cost to the cell. Alternatively, stronger metals might be used with thinner walls, such as stainless steel, titanium, but at an added cost to the cell. Thus, lowering the vapor pressure of the electrolyte across the operational temperatures, as shown in FIGS. 1 and 2, will have beneficial properties.


Example 2

The use of propane instead of fluoromethane improves stability of lithium metal in the electrolyte solution, as shown in Table 2. This is further shown in lithium metal plating-stripping tests conducted to determine the relative stability of the electrolyte with lithium metal. A battery coin cell composed of a lithium metal anode and stainless steel counter electrode were built and used to test lithium metal plating and stripping. The cell was used to plate 4.0 mAh/cm2 lithium metal onto the stainless steel working electrode at a current of 0.5 mA/cm2. Subsequently 0.5 mAh/cm2 of lithium metal was stripped and plated at a current of 0.5 mA/cm2 for 50 cycles. And finally, the remaining lithium metal was stripped to a high voltage cutoff of 1.0V to determine the average lithium plating and stripping cycle efficiency. These test results are shown in FIG. 3 (with hydrocarbon solvent) and FIG. 4 (without hydrocarbon solvent), showing the addition of the hydrocarbon solvent improves the coulombic efficiency (CE) of the cell. Minimal growth in overpotential and −99% coulombic efficiency is demonstrated in FIG. 3 as opposed to FIG. 4 with lowered coulombic efficiency of 97% when not using a hydrocarbon component in the electrolyte. This is indicative of minimal dendritic growth and favorable solid electrolyte interphase passivation products via lowering the electrolyte reactivity with the lithium metal anode with the use of a hydrocarbon solvent.


Example 3

Electrolytic conductivity measurements were conducted on various electrolytes with and without hydrocarbon solvents. The electrolyte solutions containing hydrocarbon co-solvents demonstrate similar electrolytic conductivity to the fluoromethane and difluoromethane dominant electrolyte as shown in FIG. 5. Slightly lower conductivity with hydrocarbon solvent would still be acceptable for a functional device, particularly one with a lower pressure and lower GWP.


Example 4

A battery coin cell composed of a lithium metal anode, graphite cathode, and varying electrolytes is compared in FIG. 6 and FIG. 7. The cells were cycled at a C/10 rate for 5 cycles showing the electrolyte's ability to form a stable solid electrolyte interphase with the graphite anode. FIG. 6 shows performance for a cell made with a hydrocarbon based electrolyte while FIG. 7 shows performance for a cell made with an electrolyte with no hydrocarbon solvent. This shows the hydrocarbon addition can lower the vapor pressure and GWP of the electrolyte without sacrificing cell performance.


Example 5

A battery coin cell using a lithium metal anode, lithium-nickel-manganese oxide (NMC622) cathode, and an electrolyte composed of 1.0M LiTFSI and 2.0M trimethyl phosphate in 90 parts by mole fluoromethane, and 10 parts by mole carbon dioxide was constructed. Performance is shown in FIG. 8. This electrolyte contains no hydrocarbon solvent.


Example 6

A battery coin cell composed of a lithium metal anode, lithium-nickel-manganese oxide (NMC622) cathode, and an electrolyte composed of 1.0M LiTFSI and 2.0M trimethyl phosphate in 80 parts by mole fluoromethane, 10 parts by mole iso-butane, and 10 parts by mole carbon dioxide. This electrolyte solution has a GWP of 93 and pressure of 486 psi at 293.15K. The cell was cycled to 4.2V at various rates of C/10, C/5, C/3, C/2, 1C, and 2C rate for 5 cycles at each rate. Cell performance is shown in FIG. 9. This cell shows similar performance compared to the similar cell with no hydrocarbon solvent in FIG. 8.


Example 8

A battery coin cell composed of a lithium metal anode, lithium-nickel-manganese oxide (NMC622) cathode, and an electrolyte composed of 1.0M LiTFSI and 2.0M trimethyl phosphate in 80 parts by mole fluoromethane, 10 parts by mole n-butane, and 10 parts by mole carbon dioxide. This electrolyte solution has a GWP of 93 and pressure of 484 psi at 293.15K. The cell was cycled to 4.2V at various rates of C/10, C/5, C/3, C/2, 1C, and 2C rate for 5 cycles at each rate. Cell performance is shown in FIG. 10. This cell shows similar performance compared to the similar cell with no hydrocarbon solvent in FIG. 8.


Example 9

A battery coin cell composed of a lithium metal anode, lithium-nickel-manganese oxide (NMC622) cathode, and an electrolyte composed of 1.0M LiTFSI and 2.0M trimethyl phosphate in 70 parts by mole difluoromethane, 20 parts by mole n-butane, and 10 parts by mole carbon dioxide. This electrolyte solution has a GWP of 475 and pressure of 246 psi at 293.15K. The cell was cycled to 4.2V at various rates of C/10, C/5, C/3, C/2, 1C, and 2C rate for 5 cycles at each rate. Cell performance is shown in FIG. 11. This cell shows similar performance compared to the similar cell with no hydrocarbon solvent in FIG. 8.


Example 10

A battery coin cell composed of a lithium metal anode, lithium-nickel-manganese oxide (NMC622) cathode, and an electrolyte composed of 1.0M LiTFSI and 2.0M triethyl phosphate in 40 parts by mole fluoromethane, 50 parts by mole propane, and 10 parts by mole carbon dioxide. This electrolyte solution has a GWP of 48 and pressure of 345 psi at 293.15K. The cell was cycled to 4.2V at various rates of C/10, C/5, C/3, C/2, 1C, and 2C rate for 5 cycles at each rate. Cell performance is shown in FIG. 12. This cell shows similar performance compared to the similar cell with no hydrocarbon solvent in FIG. 8.


Example 11

A battery coin cell composed of a lithium metal anode, lithium-nickel-manganese oxide (NMC622) cathode, and an electrolyte composed of 1.0M LiTFSI and 2.0M triethyl phosphate in 40 parts by mole fluoromethane, 50 parts by mole propene, and 10 parts by mole carbon dioxide. This electrolyte solution has a GWP of 47 and pressure of 357 psi at 293.15K. The cell was cycled to 4.2V at various rates of C/10, C/5, C/3, C/2, 1C, and 2C rate for 5 cycles at each rate. Cell performance is shown in FIG. 13. This cell shows similar performance compared to the similar cell with no hydrocarbon solvent in FIG. 8.


Example 12

A battery coin cell composed of a lithium metal anode, lithium-nickel-manganese oxide (NMC622) cathode, and an electrolyte composed of 1.0M LiTFSI and 2.0M triethyl phosphate in 35 parts by mole difluoromethane, 60 parts by mole propane, and 5 parts by mole carbon dioxide. This electrolyte solution has a GWP of 239 and pressure of 195 psi at 293.15K. The cell was cycled to 4.2V at various rates of C/10, C/5, C/3, C/2, 1C, and 2C rate for 5 cycles at each rate. Cell performance is shown in FIG. 14. This cell shows similar performance compared to the similar cell with no hydrocarbon solvent in FIG. 8. Afterwards, the cell was cycled at 1 C rate to measure the lifetime degradation, shown in FIG. 15. Well over 1000 cycles is demonstrated for the electrolyte with the hydrocarbon solvent (electrolyte 2), which is improved over the electrolyte with no hydrocarbon solvent (electrolyte 1).


Example 13

The vapor pressure of several liquefied gas electrolytes were measured with varying amounts of salt. Three solvent systems were used: Solvent 1 (45 parts by mole difluoromethane, 45 parts by mole fluoromethane, and 10 parts by mole carbon dioxide), Solvent 2 (31.5 parts by mole difluoromethane, 31.5 parts by mole fluoromethane, 7 parts by mole carbon dioxide, and 30 parts by mole iso-butane), and Solvent 3 (31.5 parts by mole difluoromethane, 31.5 parts by mole fluoromethane, 7 parts by mole carbon dioxide, and 30 parts by mole acetylene). Other than the pure solvent with 0.0M salt, each electrolyte contained LiTFSI and trimethyl phosphate in a 1:2 molar ratio. Each electrolyte contained either 0.0, 0.1, 0.5, 1.0, or 1.5M LiTFSI salt. Vapor pressure curves of each electrolyte are shown in FIG. 16. It is observed that the salt concentration shows no change of the vapor pressure of the electrolyte, or well within the uncertainty of the measurement. Further, it is demonstrated that an the vapor pressure of a liquefied gas electrolyte containing no hydrocarbon (Solvent 1) may be tuned higher (Solvent 3) or lower (Solvent 2) with the addition of various hydrocarbon additives to tune the electrolyte vapor pressure to optimal performance. Again this is consistent with the finding shown in FIGS. 1 and 2.


Example 14

A cell was constructed with a graphite anode and a NMC622 cathode and tested under a thermal ramp test. Temperature was increased at a rate of 5° C. per minute. Voltage and temperature data of the cell are shown in FIG. 17. It is seen that a temperature of approximately +90° C., the liquefied gas electrolyte pressure reaches the vent pressure of the cell and the electrolyte is vented to atmosphere and the voltage immediately drops to zero. After the cell is vented and voltage drops to zero, the cell is continued to heat at the same rate with no reaction observed up to a temperature of +240° C. and shows the cell may fail safely. This remarkable result is in contrast to a typical cell which sees thermal runaway onset at temperatures as low as +100° C. and can reach temperatures as high as +800° C. during the thermal runaway reaction.


Example 15

A 2 Ah cell was constructed with a graphite anode and a NMC622 cathode and liquefied gas electrolyte and tested in an overcharge test. The cell was charged at a rate of 2 Amp and the voltage and temperature of the cell were observed, data shown in FIG. 18. It was seen that as the cell reached an overcharged state of 5.4 V (nominal voltage of cell was 4.2 V), the cell over heated and reached a temperature of +60° C. at which point the vapor pressure of the liquefied gas electrolyte was sufficiently high to open the cell vent and allow the liquefied gas electrolyte to rapidly vent to atmosphere and allowed the cell to fail safely. It was also noted that the vent opened at a temperature lower than expected due to the oxygen evolution from the cathode during the overcharge. This increased oxygen content increased the pressure of the liquefied gas electrolyte and allowed the cell to vent at a lower temperature, thus improving the safety of the cell before there could be a hazardous thermal runaway reaction or explosion with the oxygen containing electrolyte. This result is in stark contrast to conventional Li-ion cells in which an overcharge test will result in a thermal runaway reaction, cell explosion, and hazardous situation.


Example 16

A 2 Ah cell was constructed with a graphite anode and a NMC622 cathode and liquefied gas electrolyte and tested under a crush test while the cell was held at a full voltage of 4.2 V. The cell was crushed with a 18 mm diameter cylindrical impactor at a rate of 1 mm per minute into the center of the cell. The cell temperature and voltage were observed and data shown in FIG. 19. At approximately 9 minutes into the test, it was observed the can was fractured and the liquefied gas electrolyte was allowed to escape the cell. It was also observed that there was a cell internal short circuit, causing a small increase in cell temperature, but the electrolyte was allowed to vent off quickly enough to prevent any thermal runaway event from occurring and allowing the cell to fail safely. This is in stark contrast to a cell containing conventional liquid electrolyte which shows thermal runaway during a crush test due to the short circuiting of the cell.


Construction of an Electrochemical Energy Storage Device

A method of constructing a electrochemical energy storage device with a safe liquefied gas electrolyte that will gas off at 100 kPa at a temperature of 293.15 K is shown in FIG. 20A. In step 20-1, a first mixture is formed by mixing a first electrolyte component (one or more solvents) with a second electrolyte component (one or more hydrocarbon co-solvents). The addition of the second electrolyte component (1) lowers the vapor pressure of the first mixture by at least 10% as compared to the vapor pressure of the first electrolyte component alone when measured at 293.15 K; (2) results in a vapor pressure of the first mixture above 100 kPa at a temperature of 293.15 K. The second electrolyte component may also lower the global warming potential (GWP) of the first mixture by at least 10% as compared to GWP of the first component alone. The in step 20-2, the safe liquefied gas electrolyte is formed by mixing a third electrolyte component (one or more salts) to the first mixture. This safe liquefied gas electrolyte is then added to a cell housing with an anode and a cathode in step 20-3, such that the anode and the cathode are in contact with the safe liquefied gas electrolyte. Alternatively, as shown in FIG. 20B, the third electrolyte component (salt) may first be added to the cell housing, then the first mixture is added to the cell housing (step 20-3B), mixing with the third electrolyte component (salt) to form the safe liquefied gas electrolyte (step 20-2B). Finally, the cell housing is sealed in step 20-4.


In an exemplary electrochemical device constructed by this method, the electrodes are composed of any combination of two electrodes such as carbons like graphite, graphene, graphene oxide, carbon, activated carbon, or silicon, lithium titanate, titanium disulfide, molybdenum disulfide, lithium iron phosphate, lithium cobalt phosphate, lithium nickel phosphate, lithium cobalt oxide, lithium nickel manganese oxide, lithium nickel manganese cobalt oxide, lithium nickel cobalt aluminum oxide or chemical reaction electrodes such as with chemicals of sulfur, oxygen, carbon dioxide, nitrogen, sulfur dioxide, thionyl fluoride, thionyl chloride fluoride, sulfinyl fluoride, sulfuryl chloride fluoride, or of a metallic electrode with lithium, sodium, zinc, aluminum, magnesium, calcium metal or an alloy of these metals or any combination thereof. The electrodes may further include various binder polymer components including polyvinylidene fluoride, carboxymethyl cellulose, styrene-butadiene rubber, or polytetrafluoroethylene in order to maintain structural integrity of the electrode. This method can be used to manufacture a battery or a capacitor.


Although exemplary embodiments and applications of the invention have been described herein including as described above and shown in the included example Figures, there is no intention that the invention be limited to these exemplary embodiments and applications or to the manner in which the exemplary embodiments and applications operate or are described herein. Indeed, many variation and modifications to the exemplary embodiments are possible as would be apparent to a person of ordinary skill in the art. The invention may include any device, structure, method, or functionality, as long as the resulting device, system or method falls within the scope of one of the claims that are allowed by the patent office based on this or any related patent application.

Claims
  • 1. A method of forming a safe liquefied gas electrolyte that will gas off at 100 kPa at a temperature of 293.15 K, the method comprising: (a) forming a first mixture from a first electrolyte component mixed with a second electrolyte component to achieve (1) a lower the vapor pressure of the first mixture by at least 10% as compared to the vapor pressure of the first electrolyte component alone when measured at 293.15 K; and (2) a vapor pressure of the first mixture above 100 kPa at a temperature of 293.15 K;(b) following step (a), forming the safe liquefied gas electrolyte by mixing a third electrolyte component to the first mixture;wherein the first electrolyte component is selected from the group consisting of dimethyl ether, methyl ethyl ether, fluoromethane, difluoromethane, trifluoromethane, fluoroethane, tetrafluoroethane, pentafluoroethane, 1,1-difluoroethane, 1,2-difluoroethane, 1,1,1-trifluoroethane, 1,1,2-trifluoroethane, 1,1,1,2-tetrafluoroethane, 1,1,2,2-tetrafluoroethane, pentafluoroethane, chloromethane, chloroethane, thionyl fluoride, thionyl chloride fluoride, phosphoryl fluoride, phosphoryl chloride fluoride, sulfuryl fluoride, sulfuryl chloride fluoride, 1-fluoropropane, 2-fluoropropane, 1,1-difluoropropane, 1,2-difluoropropane, 2,2-fluoropropane, 1,1,1-trifluoropropane, 1,1,2-trifluoropropane, 1,2,2-trifluoropropane, fluoroethylene, cis-1,2-fluoroethylene, 1,1-fluoroethyl ene, 1-fluoropropylene, 2-propylene, chlorine, chloromethane, bromine, iodine, ammonia, methyl amine, dimethyl amine, trimethyl amine, molecular oxygen, molecular nitrogen, carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, sulfur dioxide, methyl vinyl ether, difluoro ethylene, nitrous oxide, nitrogen dioxide, nitrogen oxide, carbon disulfide, hydrogen fluoride, hydrogen, isomers thereof, or a combination thereof;wherein the second component is selected from the group consisting of methane, ethane, propane, n-butane, iso-butane, cyclopropane, cyclopropane, ethene, propene, butene, cyclobutane, cyclobutene, acetylene, pentane, hexane, heptane, octane, cyclopentane, cyclohexane, cycloheptane, cyclooctane, isomers thereof, or a combination thereof;wherein the third component is selected from the group consisting of lithium bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide (LiTFSI), lithium hexafluorophosphate (LiPF6), lithium perchlorate (LiClO4), lithium hexafluoroarsenate (LiAsF6), lithium tetrachloroaluminate (LiAlCl4), lithium tetragaliumaluminate, lithium bis(oxalato)borate (LiBOB), lithium hexafluorostannate, lithium difluoro(oxalato)borate (LiDFOB), lithium bis(fluorosulfonyl)imide (LiFSI), lithium aluminum fluoride (LiAlF3), lithium nitrate (LiNO3), lithium chloroaluminate, lithium tetrafluoroborate (LiBF4), lithium tetrachloroaluminate, lithium difluorophosphate, lithium tetrafluoro(oxalato)phosphate, lithium difluorobis(oxalato)phosphate, lithium borate, lithium oxolate, lithium thiocyanate, lithium tetrachlorogallate, lithium chloride, lithium bromide, lithium iodide, lithium carbonate, lithium fluoride, lithium oxide, lithium hydroxide, lithium nitride, lithium super oxide, lithium azide, lithium deltate, di-lithium squarate, lithium croconate dihydrate, dilithium rhodizonate, lithium oxalate, di-lithium ketomalonate, lithium di-ketosuccinate or any corresponding salts with the positive charged lithium cation substituted for sodium or magnesium or any combinations thereof. Further useful salts include those with positively charged cations such as tetramethylammonium, tetraethylammonium, tetrapropylammonium, tetrabutylammonium, triethylmethylammonium ammonium, spiro-(1,1′)-bipyrrolidinium, 1,1-dimethylpyrrolidinium, and 1,1-diethylpyrrolidinium, N,N-diethyl-N-methyl-N(2methoxyethyl)ammonium, N,N-Diethyl-N-methyl-N-propylammonium, N,N-dimethyl-N-ethyl-N-(3-methoxypropyl)ammonium, N,N-Dimethyl-N-ethyl-N-benzylAmmonium, N,N-Dimethyl-N-ethyl-N-phenylethylammonium, N-Ethyl-N,N-dimethyl-N-(2-methoxyethyl)ammonium, N-Tributyl-N-methylammonium, N-Trimethyl-N-hexyl ammonium, N-Trimethyl-N-butylammonium, N-Trimethyl-N-propylammonium, 1,3-Dimethylimidazolium, 1-(4-Sulfobutyl)-3-methylimidazolium, 1-Allyl-3H-imidazolium, 1-Butyl-3-methylimidazolium, 1-Ethyl-3-methylimidazolium, 1-Hexyl-3-methylimidazolium, 1-Octyl-3-methylimidazolium, 3-Methyl-1-propylimidazolium, H-3-Methylimidazolium, Trihexyl(tetradecyl)phosphonium, N-Butyl-N-methylpiperidinium, N-Propyl-N-methylpiperidinium, 1-Butyl-1-Methylpyrrolidinium, 1-Methyl-1-(2-methoxyethyl)pyrrolidinium, 1-Methyl-1-(3-methoxypropyl)pyrrolidinium, 1-Methyl-1-octylpyrrolidinium, 1-Methyl-1-pentylpyrrolidinium, or N-methylpyrrolidinium paired with negatively charged anions such as acetate, bis(fluorosulfonyl)imide, bis(oxalate)borate, bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide, bromide, chloride, dicyanamide, diethyl phosphate, hexafluorophosphate, hydrogen sulfate, iodide, methanesulfonate, methyl-phophonate, tetrachloroaluminate, tetrafluoroborate, trifluoromethanesulfonate, or a combination thereof.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the second electrolyte component lowers the global warming potential (GWP) of the first mixture by at least 10% as compared to the GWP of the first electrolyte component alone.
  • 3. The method of claim 1, wherein step (a) achieves a lower the vapor pressure of the first mixture by at least 20% as compared to the vapor pressure of the first electrolyte component alone when measured at 313.15 K.
  • 4. The method of claim 1, wherein step (b) further comprises mixing a fourth electrolyte component, wherein the forth component is selected from the group consisting of a linear ether, cyclic ether, linear carbonate, cyclic carbonate, nitrile, phosphate, or a combination thereof.
  • 5. A method of constructing a electrochemical energy storage device with a safe liquefied gas electrolyte that will gas off at 100 kPa at a temperature of 293.15 K, the method comprising: (a) forming a first mixture from a first electrolyte component mixed with a second electrolyte component to achieve (1) a lower the vapor pressure of the first mixture by at least 10% as compared to the vapor pressure of the first electrolyte component alone when measured at 293.15 K and (2) a vapor pressure of the first mixture above 100 kPa at a temperature of 293.15 K;(b) following step (a), forming the safe liquefied gas electrolyte by mixing a third electrolyte component to the first mixture;(c) providing a cell housing with two electrodes;(d) adding the safe liquefied gas electrolyte to the cell housing, such that the two electrodes are in contact with the safe liquefied gas electrolyte;(e) sealing the cell housing;wherein the first electrolyte component is selected from the group consisting of dimethyl ether, methyl ethyl ether, fluoromethane, difluoromethane, trifluoromethane, fluoroethane, tetrafluoroethane, pentafluoroethane, 1,1-difluoroethane, 1,2-difluoroethane, 1,1,1-trifluoroethane, 1,1,2-trifluoroethane, 1,1,1,2-tetrafluoroethane, 1,1,2,2-tetrafluoroethane, pentafluoroethane, chloromethane, chloroethane, thionyl fluoride, thionyl chloride fluoride, phosphoryl fluoride, phosphoryl chloride fluoride, sulfuryl fluoride, sulfuryl chloride fluoride, 1-fluoropropane, 2-fluoropropane, 1,1-difluoropropane, 1,2-difluoropropane, 2,2-fluoropropane, 1,1,1-trifluoropropane, 1,1,2-trifluoropropane, 1,2,2-trifluoropropane, fluoroethylene, cis-1,2-fluoroethylene, 1,1-fluoroethylene, 1-fluoropropylene, 2-propylene, chlorine, chloromethane, bromine, iodine, ammonia, methyl amine, dimethyl amine, trimethyl amine, molecular oxygen, molecular nitrogen, carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, sulfur dioxide, methyl vinyl ether, difluoro ethylene, nitrous oxide, nitrogen dioxide, nitrogen oxide, carbon disulfide, hydrogen fluoride, hydrogen, isomers thereof, or a combination thereof;wherein the second component is selected from the group consisting of methane, ethane, propane, n-butane, iso-butane, cyclopropane, cyclopropane, ethene, propene, butene, cyclobutane, cyclobutene, acetylene, pentane, hexane, heptane, octane, cyclopentane, cyclohexane, cycloheptane, cyclooctane, isomers thereof, or a combination thereof;wherein the third component is selected from the group consisting of lithium bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide (LiTFSI), lithium hexafluorophosphate (LiPF6), lithium perchlorate (LiClO4), lithium hexafluoroarsenate (LiAsF6), lithium tetrachloroaluminate (LiAlCl4), lithium tetragaliumaluminate, lithium bis(oxalato)borate (LiBOB), lithium hexafluorostannate, lithium difluoro(oxalato)borate (LiDFOB), lithium bis(fluorosulfonyl)imide (LiFSI), lithium aluminum fluoride (LiAlF3), lithium nitrate (LiNO3), lithium chloroaluminate, lithium tetrafluoroborate (LiBF4), lithium tetrachloroaluminate, lithium difluorophosphate, lithium tetrafluoro(oxalato)phosphate, lithium difluorobis(oxalato)phosphate, lithium borate, lithium oxolate, lithium thiocyanate, lithium tetrachlorogallate, lithium chloride, lithium bromide, lithium iodide, lithium carbonate, lithium fluoride, lithium oxide, lithium hydroxide, lithium nitride, lithium super oxide, lithium azide, lithium deltate, di-lithium squarate, lithium croconate dihydrate, dilithium rhodizonate, lithium oxalate, di-lithium ketomalonate, lithium di-ketosuccinate or any corresponding salts with the positive charged lithium cation substituted for sodium or magnesium or any combinations thereof. Further useful salts include those with positively charged cations such as tetramethylammonium, tetraethylammonium, tetrapropylammonium, tetrabutylammonium, triethylmethylammonium ammonium, spiro-(1,1′)-bipyrrolidinium, 1,1-dimethylpyrrolidinium, and 1,1-diethylpyrrolidinium, N,N-diethyl-N-methyl-N(2methoxyethyl)ammonium, N,N-Diethyl-N-methyl-N-propylammonium, N,N-dim ethyl-N-ethyl-N-(3-methoxypropyl)ammonium, N,N-Dimethyl-N-ethyl-N-benzylAmmonium, N,N-Dimethyl-N-ethyl-N-phenylethylammonium, N-Ethyl-N,N-dim ethyl-N-(2-methoxyethyl)ammonium, N-Tributyl-N-methyl ammonium, N-Trim ethyl-N-hexyl ammonium, N-Trimethyl-N-butylammonium, N-Trim ethyl-N-propylammonium, 1,3-Dimethylimidazolium, 1-(4-Sulfobutyl)-3-methylimidazolium, 1-Allyl-3H-imidazolium, 1-Butyl-3-methylimidazolium, 1-Ethyl-3-methylimidazolium, 1-Hexyl-3-methylimidazolium, 1-Octyl-3-methylimidazolium, 3-Methyl-1-propylimidazolium, H-3-Methylimidazolium, Trihexyl(tetradecyl)phosphonium, N-Butyl-N-methylpiperidinium, N-Propyl-N-methylpiperidinium, 1-Butyl-1-Methylpyrrolidinium, 1-Methyl-1-(2-methoxyethyl)pyrrolidinium, 1-Methyl-1-(3-methoxypropyl)pyrrolidinium, 1-Methyl-1-octylpyrrolidinium, 1-Methyl-1-pentylpyrrolidinium, or N-methylpyrrolidinium paired with negatively charged anions such as acetate, bis(fluorosulfonyl)imide, bis(oxalate)borate, bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide, bromide, chloride, dicyanamide, diethyl phosphate, hexafluorophosphate, hydrogen sulfate, iodide, methanesulfonate, methyl-phophonate, tetrachloroaluminate, tetrafluoroborate, trifluoromethanesulfonate, or a combination thereof.
  • 6. The method of claim 5, wherein the second electrolyte component lowers the global warming potential (GWP) of the first mixture by at least 10% as compared to GWP of the first electrolyte component alone.
  • 7. The method of claim 5, wherein step (a) achieves a lower the vapor pressure of the first mixture by at least 20% as compared to the vapor pressure of the first electrolyte component alone when measured at 313.15 K.
  • 8. The method of claim 5, wherein step (c) further comprises mixing a fourth electrolyte component, wherein the forth component is selected from the group consisting of a linear ether, cyclic ether, linear carbonate, cyclic carbonate, nitrile, phosphate, or a combination thereof.
  • 9. The method of claim 5, wherein the electrodes are comprised of graphite, graphene, grapheme oxide, carbon, activated carbon, silicon, lithium titanate, titanium disulfide, molybdenum disulfide, lithium iron phosphate, lithium cobalt phosphate, lithium nickel phosphate, lithium cobalt oxide, lithium nickel manganese oxide, lithium nickel manganese cobalt oxide, lithium nickel cobalt aluminum oxide or chemical reaction electrodes such as with chemicals of sulfur, oxygen, carbon dioxide, nitrogen, sulfur dioxide, thionyl fluoride, thionyl chloride fluoride, sulfuryl fluoride, sulfuryl chloride fluoride, or of a metallic electrode with lithium, sodium, zinc, aluminum, magnesium, calcium metal or an alloy of these metals or any combination thereof.
  • 10. The method of claim 5, wherein the electrochemical energy storage device is a battery.
  • 11. The method of claim 5, wherein the electrochemical energy storage device is a capacitor.
  • 12. A method of constructing a electrochemical energy storage device with a safe liquefied gas electrolyte that will gas off at 100 kPa at a temperature of 293.15 K, the method comprising: (a) forming a first mixture from a first electrolyte component mixed with a second electrolyte component to achieve (1) a lower the vapor pressure of the first mixture by at least 10% as compared to the vapor pressure of the first electrolyte component alone when measured at 293.15 K and (2) a vapor pressure of the first mixture above 100 kPa at a temperature of 293.15 K;(b) providing a cell housing with two electrodes and a third electrolyte component;(c) adding the first mixture to the cell housing such that (1) the safe liquefied gas electrolyte is formed by mixing the first mixture with the third electrolyte component and (2) the two electrodes are in contact with the safe liquefied gas electrolyte;(d) sealing the cell housing;wherein the first electrolyte component is selected from the group consisting of dimethyl ether, methyl ethyl ether, fluoromethane, difluoromethane, trifluoromethane, fluoroethane, tetrafluoroethane, pentafluoroethane, 1,1-difluoroethane, 1,2-difluoroethane, 1,1,1-trifluoroethane, 1,1,2-trifluoroethane, 1,1,1,2-tetrafluoroethane, 1,1,2,2-tetrafluoroethane, pentafluoroethane, chloromethane, chloroethane, thionyl fluoride, thionyl chloride fluoride, phosphoryl fluoride, phosphoryl chloride fluoride, sulfuryl fluoride, sulfuryl chloride fluoride, 1-fluoropropane, 2-fluoropropane, 1,1-difluoropropane, 1,2-difluoropropane, 2,2-fluoropropane, 1,1,1-trifluoropropane, 1,1,2-trifluoropropane, 1,2,2-trifluoropropane, fluoroethylene, cis-1,2-fluoroethylene, 1,1-fluoroethylene, 1-fluoropropylene, 2-propylene, chlorine, chloromethane, bromine, iodine, ammonia, methyl amine, dimethyl amine, trimethyl amine, molecular oxygen, molecular nitrogen, carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, sulfur dioxide, methyl vinyl ether, difluoro ethylene, nitrous oxide, nitrogen dioxide, nitrogen oxide, carbon disulfide, hydrogen fluoride, hydrogen, isomers thereof, or a combination thereof;wherein the second component is selected from the group consisting of methane, ethane, propane, n-butane, iso-butane, cyclopropane, cyclopropane, ethene, propene, butene, cyclobutane, cyclobutene, acetylene, pentane, hexane, heptane, octane, cyclopentane, cyclohexane, cycloheptane, cyclooctane, isomers thereof, or a combination thereof;wherein the third component is selected from the group consisting of lithium bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide (LiTFSI), lithium hexafluorophosphate (LiPF6), lithium perchlorate (LiClO4), lithium hexafluoroarsenate (LiAsF6), lithium tetrachloroaluminate (LiAlCl4), lithium tetragaliumaluminate, lithium bis(oxalato)borate (LiBOB), lithium hexafluorostannate, lithium difluoro(oxalato)borate (LiDFOB), lithium bis(fluorosulfonyl)imide (LiFSI), lithium aluminum fluoride (LiAlF3), lithium nitrate (LiNO3), lithium chloroaluminate, lithium tetrafluoroborate (LiBF4), lithium tetrachloroaluminate, lithium difluorophosphate, lithium tetrafluoro(oxalato)phosphate, lithium difluorobis(oxalato)phosphate, lithium borate, lithium oxolate, lithium thiocyanate, lithium tetrachlorogallate, lithium chloride, lithium bromide, lithium iodide, lithium carbonate, lithium fluoride, lithium oxide, lithium hydroxide, lithium nitride, lithium super oxide, lithium azide, lithium deltate, di-lithium squarate, lithium croconate dihydrate, dilithium rhodizonate, lithium oxalate, di-lithium ketomalonate, lithium di-ketosuccinate or any corresponding salts with the positive charged lithium cation substituted for sodium or magnesium or any combinations thereof. Further useful salts include those with positively charged cations such as tetramethylammonium, tetraethylammonium, tetrapropylammonium, tetrabutylammonium, triethylmethylammonium ammonium, spiro-(1,1′)-bipyrrolidinium, 1,1-dimethylpyrrolidinium, and 1,1-diethylpyrrolidinium, N,N-diethyl-N-methyl-N(2methoxyethyl)ammonium, N,N-Diethyl-N-methyl-N-propylammonium, N,N-dimethyl-N-ethyl-N-(3-methoxypropyl)ammonium, N,N-Dimethyl-N-ethyl-N-benzylAmmonium, N,N-Dimethyl-N-ethyl-N-phenylethylammonium, N-Ethyl-N,N-dimethyl-N-(2-methoxyethyl)ammonium, N-Tributyl-N-methyl ammonium, N-Trim ethyl-N-hexyl ammonium, N-Trimethyl-N-butylammonium, N-Trimethyl-N-propylammonium, 1,3-Dimethylimidazolium, 1-(4-Sulfobutyl)-3-methylimidazolium, 1-Allyl-3H-imidazolium, 1-Butyl-3-methylimidazolium, 1-Ethyl-3-methylimidazolium, 1-Hexyl-3-methylimidazolium, 1-Octyl-3-methylimidazolium, 3-Methyl-1-propylimidazolium, H-3-Methylimidazolium, Trihexyl(tetradecyl)phosphonium, N-Butyl-N-methylpiperidinium, N-Propyl-N-methylpiperidinium, 1-Butyl-1-Methylpyrrolidinium, 1-Methyl-1-(2-methoxyethyl)pyrrolidinium, 1-Methyl-1-(3-methoxypropyl)pyrrolidinium, 1-Methyl-1-octylpyrrolidinium, 1-Methyl-1-pentylpyrrolidinium, or N-methylpyrrolidinium paired with negatively charged anions such as acetate, bis(fluorosulfonyl)imide, bis(oxalate)borate, bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide, bromide, chloride, dicyanamide, diethyl phosphate, hexafluorophosphate, hydrogen sulfate, iodide, methanesulfonate, methyl-phophonate, tetrachloroaluminate, tetrafluoroborate, trifluoromethanesulfonate, or a combination thereof.
  • 13. An energy storage device, comprising: an ionically conducting electrolyte comprising a mixture of a compressed gas solvent and a salt, wherein the compressed gas solvent is selected from the group consisting of dimethyl ether, methyl ethyl ether, fluoromethane, difluoromethane, trifluoromethane, fluoroethane, tetrafluoroethane, pentafluoroethane, 1,1-difluoroethane, 1,2-difluoroethane, 1,1,1-trifluoroethane, 1,1,2-trifluoroethane, 1,1,1,2-tetrafluoroethane, 1,1,2,2-tetrafluoroethane, pentafluoroethane, chloromethane, chloroethane, thionyl fluoride, thionyl chloride fluoride, phosphoryl fluoride, phosphoryl chloride fluoride, sulfuryl fluoride, sulfuryl chloride fluoride, 1-fluoropropane, 2-fluoropropane, 1,1-difluoropropane, 1,2-difluoropropane, 2,2-fluoropropane, 1,1,1-trifluoropropane, 1,1,2-trifluoropropane, 1,2,2-trifluoropropane, fluoroethylene, cis-1,2-fluoroethylene, 1,1-fluoroethylene, 1-fluoropropylene, 2-propylene, chlorine, chloromethane, bromine, iodine, ammonia, methyl amine, dimethyl amine, trimethyl amine, molecular oxygen, molecular nitrogen, carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, sulfur dioxide, methyl vinyl ether, difluoro ethylene, nitrous oxide, nitrogen dioxide, nitrogen oxide, carbon disulfide, hydrogen fluoride, hydrogen, and isomers thereof;a housing enclosing the ionically conducting electrolyte under a pressurized condition to maintain the compressed gas solvent at a pressure higher than 100 kPa at a room temperature of 293.15 K;two electrodes in contact with the ionically conducting electrolyte; anda hydrocarbon solvent added to the ionically conducting electrolyte, the hydrocarbon solvent (1) lowers the vapor pressure of the ionically conducting electrolyte by at least 10% as compared to the vapor pressure of the compressed gas solvent alone when measured at 293.15 K and (2) achieves a pressure of the combined ionically conducting electrolyte and hydrocarbon solvent above 100 kPa at a temperature of 293.15 K.
  • 14. The energy storage device of claim 13, wherein the hydrocarbon solvent lowers the global warming potential (GWP) of the ionically conducting electrolyte by at least 10% as compared to the GWP of the compressed gas solvent alone.
  • 15. The energy storage device of claim 13, wherein the hydrocarbon solvent lowers the vapor pressure of the ionically conducting electrolyte by at least 20% as compared to the vapor pressure of the compressed gas solvent alone when measured at 313.15 K.
  • 16. The energy storage device of claim 13, further comprising an additional component added to the ionically conducting electrolyte, wherein the additional component is selected from the group consisting of a linear ether, cyclic ether, linear carbonate, cyclic carbonate, nitrile, phosphate, or a combination thereof.
  • 17. The energy storage device of claim 13, wherein the hydrocarbon solvent is an alkane, alkene, or alkylene.
  • 18. The energy storage device of claim 13 wherein the hydrocarbon solvent is selected from the group consisting of methane, ethane, propane, n-butane, iso-butane, cyclopropane, cyclopropane, ethene, propene, butene, cyclobutane, cyclobutene, acetylene, pentane, hexane, heptane, octane, cyclopentane, cyclohexane, cycloheptane, cyclooctane, isomers thereof, and a combination thereof.
  • 19. The energy storage device of claim 13, wherein the hydrocarbon co-solvent is used in a ratio between 0.01 in a hundred and 99.99 in a hundred by mass or by molar ratio.
  • 20. The energy storage device of claim 13, wherein the electrodes are comprised of graphite, graphene, graphene oxide, carbon, activated carbon, silicon, lithium titanate, titanium disulfide, molybdenum disulfide, lithium iron phosphate, lithium cobalt phosphate, lithium nickel phosphate, lithium cobalt oxide, lithium nickel manganese oxide, lithium nickel manganese cobalt oxide, lithium nickel cobalt aluminum oxide or chemical reaction electrodes such as with chemicals of sulfur, oxygen, carbon dioxide, nitrogen, sulfur dioxide, thionyl fluoride, thionyl chloride fluoride, sulfuryl fluoride, sulfuryl chloride fluoride, or of a metallic electrode with lithium, sodium, zinc, aluminum, magnesium, calcium metal or an alloy of these metals or any combination thereof.
  • 21. The energy storage device of claim 13, wherein the energy storage device is a battery.
  • 22. The energy storage device of claim 13, energy storage device is a capacitor.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claim priority as a continuation of PCT US22/31594 filed on May 31, 1922 which claims priority to U.S. application 63/195,592 filed on Jun. 1, 1921. The entire contents of these applications are incorporated herein by reference. This application is also related to the applications and patents, each of which is hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety: U.S. Pat. No. 10,608,284 issued on Mar. 31, 1920; U.S. Pat. No. 10,988,143 issued on May 4, 1921; U.S. Pat. No. 10,784,532 issued on Sep. 22, 1920; PCT/US19/032413 filed on May 15, 2019; PCT/US20/26086 filed on Apr. 1, 1920; U.S. Pat. No. 11,088,396 issued on Aug. 10, 1921; U.S. Pat. No. 11,049,668 issued on Jun. 29, 1921; U.S. Pat. No. 10,873,070 issued on Dec. 22, 1920; U.S. application Ser. No. 16/666,155 filed on Oct. 28, 2019; U.S. application Ser. No. 17/326,093 filed on May 20, 1921; U.S. Application 63/306,396 filed on Feb. 3, 1922; and U.S. Application 63/328,480 filed on Apr. 7, 1922.

STATEMENT REGARDING FEDERALLY SPONSORED R&D

This invention was made with U.S. government support under grant 1831087 awarded by the U.S. National Science Foundation (NSF). The U.S. government has certain rights in the invention.

Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
63195592 Jun 2021 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent PCT/US22/31594 May 2022 US
Child 18383255 US