The invention relates to multi-block isoporous structures resistant to non-aqueous and/or harsh chemical media, where the structures have at least one of high flux, high separation specificity, chemical resistance, and antifouling properties, and methods of manufacturing and use, as replacements or alternative to existing separation membrane technologies.
Membranes have been manufactured to be resistant to chemicals, heat, and radiation, by reacting fluorine containing monomers, e.g., tetrafluoroethylene, vinylidene fluoride to produce polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) or poly(vinylidene fluoride), which are hydrophilic or by providing a hydrophilic fluorine surface. These fluorine containing polymers are not isoporous, not produced by self-assembly, and do not self-assemble. Block copolymers containing fluorinated blocks have been used to create dense ion-conducting membranes, for liquid/liquid separations, or in gas/gas separations. Similarly, these fluorinated block copolymers are non-isoporous, and lack the pore tuning properties associated with self-assembled polymers and flow characteristics.
Fluoropolymer membranes are described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,130,024, where PTFE membranes are coated with hydrophilic fluorine containing copolymers on pores. Other examples of surface modified membrane are described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,928,792, where the porous membrane surface is modified with perfluorocarbon copolymer, and U.S. Pat. No. 6,354,443 where the membrane surface is coated with hydrophilic fluorinated copolymers.
In addition, fluorine-containing graft copolymers and adhesive composed essentially of the copolymer and a composite membrane of a support and the copolymer are taught in U.S. Pat. No. 4,666,991. In the U.S. Pat. No. 4,666,991, a fluorinated polymer is grafted to another polymer. Whereas other prior art techniques involve applying a fluorinated graft copolymer to existing membranes physically, e.g., dip coating, spin coating, etc.
Hollow fiber, porous membranes, with layers formed from polyethylene, polypropylene, poly (4-methylpentene-1), poly (vinylidene fluoride) or polyoxymethylene, are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,379,796. The porous layers are interposed with layers of a homogeneous thin film. The homogeneous film can include two material, where the first material is a polymer blend composed of a styrene-based thermoplastic elastomer and a polyolefin. Where the styrene-based thermoplastic elastomer and be “A block copolymer in which the hard segments comprise a styrene polymer and the soft segments comprise a polymer derived from at least one monomer selected from butadiene, ethylene-butylene isoprene and ethylene-propylene” or “A random copolymer composed of two or more types of constitutional units formed from styrene and at least one of butadiene, ethylene-butylene, isoprene and ethylene-propylene,” none of which includes a fluorinated component. The second material disclosed in the patent is a copolymer of (2, 2-bistrifluoromethyl-4, 5-difluoro-1, 3-dioxole) and tetrafluoroethylene, but is not a block copolymer.
Copolymers of fluorinated polydienes and sulfonated polystyrenes are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 7,619,036, where the block copolymers include sulfonated polystyrene blocks A along with fluorinated blocks B, having the general diblock structure AB, and triblock structure ABA.
Existing fluorinated porous membranes that contain block copolymer components include a coating of a fluorine-containing polymer/copolymer. In addition, some chemistries in these block copolymer have undesirable fouling characteristics (e.g. undesirable physical and chemical interactions) with components of the feed stream.
However, as described, the predominant technique for surface modification involves providing a coating of a fluorine containing material, which coated product can have imperfections, such as pin-holes in the coating, or be susceptible to separation or delamination. In addition, isoporous block copolymer membranes are typically formed from vinyl-derived polymers that are soluble or unstable in many organic solvents. These features typically limit their use of vinyl-derived polymers to aqueous solutions and thus their overall utility. Thus, a need exists for chemically resistant isoporous structures without the drawbacks and limitations of existing polymer membranes (e.g., chemically resistant without needing a coating), chemically resistant to harsh chemical materials, (e.g., organic materials, inorganic and organic acids and bases), and provides a structure that self-assembles to provide a pore tunable structure that is suitable for separation processes involving organic materials, inorganic and organic acids and bases.
Multiblock copolymers of the invention achieve self-assembled isoporous structures that permit high flux contemporaneously with solvent-resistance. The materials allow for multi-functionality of the isoporous materials, wherein at least one block can impart significant chemical resistance (if fluorinated, for example) while the other blocks provide other functionalities, e.g. mechanical integrity. These materials are particularly useful as chemically resistant and antifouling membranes for separations.
In the context of the invention, isoporous means having a substantially narrow pore diameter distribution. In the context of the invention, mesopores are defined as having a diameter of about 1 nm to about 200 nm. The isopores may also be mesoporous.
The invention relates to isoporous fluorinated block copolymer structures where at least one of the blocks is chemically modified to impart antifouling and/or chemical resistance properties to harsh solvent conditions from organic, acidic or basic materials, and other blocks provide mechanical integrity to the structure, to enhance its suitability for various environments. In an approach, at least one block is fluorinated prior to polymerization with other blocks. In an alternative approach, the multiblock polymer is chemically modified after the formation of the multiblock polymer.
The multiblock isoporous structures are of particular use for stocks comprising non-aqueous and/or harsh chemical media having at least one of high separation specificity, chemical resistance, and antifouling properties as replacements or alternatives to existing separation membrane technologies.
The present invention relates to block copolymer structures where at least one of the blocks is chemically fluorinated to impart chemical resistance to harsh solvent conditions from organic, acidic or basic materials.
The present invention relates to fluorinated polymer material with at least two distinct polymer blocks, wherein at least one of the blocks contains at least one of macro, meso, or micro pores, at least some of which are isoporous, wherein at least a portion of at least one polymer block is fluorinated. The mesopores are of about 1-200 nm in size and macropores are at least 200 nm or greater in size. The material is asymmetric or symmetric. The material contains at least one of macroporous domains and mesoporous domains. The block copolymer may comprise fluorinated portions either before or after isoporous material formation, or any combination of fluorination before or after isoporous material formation.
The present invention provides methods of preparing fluorinated polymer material with at least two distinct polymer blocks, by forming an isoporous structure of a multiblock copolymer, and then fluorinating at least a portion of at least one unfluorinated block with a post functionalization reaction.
The present invention provides methods where the isoporous material is formed by dissolving a polymer in at least one chemical solvent; dispensing a polymer solution onto a substrate or mold, or through a die or template; removing at least a portion of chemical solvent during which at least a portion of the polymer self-assembles; exposing the self-assembled material to a nonsolvent causing precipitation of at least a portion of the polymer; and optionally, washing the treated material.
The invention also includes a process of maintaining the integrity of an isoporous block polymer structures by chemically modifying at least one of the blocks with a fluorochemical moiety, and then forming an isoporous multiblock polymer structure.
The invention also includes separating an analyte of interest with high permeability and excellent selectivity, the membrane has uniform porosity, by contacting a non-aqueous liquid containing an analyte of interest with an isoporous fluorinated block polymer structures with at least two distinct polymer blocks.
One or more polymer blocks, or the overall polymer or polymers, may comprise complex polymer architectures, so long as the block copolymer self-assembles to generate the isoporous material. In this context, a “complex” block structure or polymer architecture signifies more than one monomer, chemistry, configuration, or structure in at least one block, or adjacent to blocks. A combination of different block copolymer starting materials is another complex architecture.
The invention also includes separating an analyte of interest with high permeability and excellent selectivity from a harsh chemical mixture generated by organic, acidic or basic liquids and the analyte of interest, by contacting the mixture with an isoporous fluorinated block polymer structure.
The invention is an isoporous structure, e.g., a membrane, film, fabric, monolith, which comprises at least one multiblock polymer where at least one block comprises at least a portion that contains fluorine atoms (“fluorinated”). The incorporation of fluorine atoms imparts chemical resistance and antifouling properties to the isoporous block copolymer structure. This combination of fluorinated polymer blocks in a multiblock copolymer (e.g. A-B, A-B-C, A-B-C-D, or A-B-C-D-E) structure, produced by self-assembly, results in a high permeability and high selectivity isoporous structure for separations in non-aqueous liquid media, e.g., organic or harsh liquid media. Additionally, the fluorination adds antifouling behavior to the material.
Table 1 below provides non-limiting examples of block copolymer architectures.
Different letters denote different chemistries, where A, B, C, D and E are respectively polymer blocks formed from the same monomer, and -co- indicates a mixture of chemistries in a specific block. The distribution of mixtures of chemistries may be periodic (ordered), random/statistical, or graded within the block.
As shown in Table 1, at least two distinct polymer blocks are present. At least one of the blocks contains at least one of macro, meso, or micro pores, at least some of which are isoporous, wherein at least a portion of at least one polymer block is fluorinated.
Mesopores may be in the range of about 1 nm to about 200 nm. In an embodiment, the mesopores are in the range of 1 nm to 200 nm. In an embodiment, the mesopores are in the range of 3 nm to 200 nm. In an embodiment, the mesopores are in the range of 5 nm to 200 nm. In an embodiment, the mesopores are in the range of 5 nm to 100 nm. In an embodiment, the mesopores are in the range of 10 nm to 100 nm.
The fluorinated isoporous structures are asymmetric, symmetric, partially symmetric or partially asymmetric.
The fluorinated isoporous structures are supported by a porous support or are unsupported. The fluorinated isoporous structures are in the form of two-dimensional (e.g. films, flat sheets) or three-dimensional (e.g. monoliths, beads, hollow fibers, tubular) structures.
The fluorinated isoporous structures are suitable as a separation media, and/or as a fabric with desirable protective properties (e.g. clothing, bandages). In the liquid-based separation application, the liquids being exposed to the fluorinated isoporous structures are not limited to purely aqueous solutions. The chemical stability imparted to the fluorinated isoporous structures from the fluorination allows solutions contacting the membrane to contain in part, or completely, non-aqueous liquids, as well as aqueous solutions that may otherwise degrade, decompose, or dissolve nonfluorinated structures. The harsh media in which the fluorinated isoporous structure may be used include, for example, highly acidic solutions, highly basic solutions, petrochemical products, organic solvents, and other organic small molecules. The fluorination of the block copolymers also imparts further heat resistance to the membranes, allowing operation at elevated temperatures.
The fluorinated isoporous structures may be achieved through several different approaches. In some approaches, at least a portion of the isoporous material is fluorinated before the formation of the isoporous structure. In some approaches, at least a portion of the isoporous material is fluorinated after the formation of the isoporous structure. In one approach, the structures are achieved by incorporating fluorinated monomer as at least a portion of the monomer feed, polymerizing the monomers to form a multiblock fluorinated polymer, and then forming an isoporous structure. In another approach, the structures are achieved by incorporating fluorinated monomer as at least a portion of the monomer feed, polymerizing the monomers to form a multiblock fluorinated copolymer, and then forming an isoporous structure, then fluorinating at least a portion of an unfluorinated block with a post functionalization reaction. In another approach, the structures are achieved by forming an isoporous structure from a multiblock copolymer, then fluorinating at least a portion of at least one unfluorinated block with a post functionalization reaction. In another approach, the structures are achieved by fluorinating at least a portion of at least one unfluorinated block of a block copolymer and then forming an isoporous structure.
In an approach, fluorine atoms are incorporated into at least a portion of at least one block of the copolymer which is used to fabricate the structure, by first fluorinating the monomer, and then polymerizing the fluorinated block with the other polymer blocks. Another approach is modifying at least a portion of at least one block of a multiblock polymer to be fluorinated, then forming the isoporous structure. Yet another approach is modifying an already fabricated isoporous structure to incorporate fluorine atoms into at least a portion of at least one block of the copolymer comprising the membrane.
The multiblock polymer must at least partially self-assemble when processed from a deposition solution comprising the multiblock polymer and a solvent system. During the process, at least a portion of the solvent system is removed; then, the material is exposed to a phase separation solvent system, such that at least a portion of the polymer material precipitates.
Suitable, non-limiting examples of fluorinated and unfluorinated polymer blocks include the following:
The invention also comprises separating and/or detecting and/or isolating an analyte of interest, comprising contacting an organic material and analyte containing fluid with the multiblock fluorinated isoporous polymer structure to obtain or detect the analyte of interest.
The multiblock polymer structures incorporate fluorine atoms through direct polymerization of fluorinated monomer and/or post-polymerization chemical functionalization, either before or after isoporous structure formation. Suitable fluorinated monomers/block chemistries include, but are not limited to, perfluorinated C3-C6 linear and cyclic compounds, fluorinated compounds such as, but not limited to, octafluoropropane (perfluoropropane), decafluorobutane (perfluorobutane), dodecafluoropentane (perfluoropentane), tetradecafluorohexane (perfluorohexane), dodecafluorocyclohexane (perfluorocyclohexane); fluorinated C6-C9 aromatic compounds; fluorinated acrylics such as, but not limited to, 2,2,3,3,4,4,5,5,6,6,7,7-dodecafluoroheptyl acrylate, 3,3,4,4,5,5,6,6,7,7,8,8,9,9,10,10,11,11,12,12,12-heneicosafluorododecyl acrylate, 3,3,4,4,5,5,6,6,7,7,8,8,9,9,10,10,10-heptadecafluorodecyl methacrylate, 2,2,3,3,4,4,4-heptafluorobutyl acrylate, 2,2,3,3,4,4,4-heptafluorobutyl methacrylate, 2,2,3,4,4,4-hexafluorobutyl acrylate, 2,2,3,4,4,4-hexafluorobutyl methacrylate, 1,1,1,3,3,3-hexafluoroisopropyl acrylate, 1,1,1,3,3,3-hexafluoroisopropyl methacrylate, 2,2,3,3,4,4,5,5-octafluoropentyl acrylate, 2,2,3,3,4,4,5,5-octafluoropentyl methacrylate, 2,2,3,3,3-pentafluoropropyl acrylate, 2,2,3,3,3-pentafluoropropyl methacrylate, 1H,1H,2H,2H-perfluorodecyl acrylate, 2,2,3,3-tetrafluoropropyl methacrylate, 3,3,4,4,5,5,6,6,7,7,8,8,8-tridecafluorooctyl acrylate, 3,3,4,4,5,5,6,6,7,7,8,8,8-tridecafluorooctyl methacrylate, 2,2,2-trifluoroethyl methacrylate, 1,1,1-trifluoro-2-(trifluoromethyl)-2-hydroxy-4-methyl-5-pentyl methacrylate, 2-[(1′,1′,1′-trifluoro-2′-(trifluoromethyl)-2′-hydroxy)propyl]-3-norbornyl methacrylate; fluorostyrenes such as, but not limited to 2-fluorostyrene, 3-fluorostyrene, 4-flourostyrene, 2,3,4,5,6-pentafluorostyrene; other fluorine containing monomers such as, but not limited to epifluorohydrin, glycidyl 2,2,3,3,4,4,5,5-octafluoropentyl ether, glycidyl 2,2,3,3-tetrafluoropropyl ether, perfluorohexylethylene, 3,3,4,4,5,5,6,6,6-nonafluoro-1-hexene, 3,3,4,4,5,5,6,6,7,7,8,8,9,9,10,10,10-heptadecafluoro-1-decene, and (2,2,3,3,4,4,5,5,6,6,7,7,8,8,9,9,9-heptadecafluorononyl)oxirane.
Mixtures of chemistries within a single block are denoted with “-co-” and two structures bound by a single set of brackets, as shown in Table 1, above. The distribution of mixed chemistries in a block may be periodic (ordered), random/statistical, or graded within the block.
In some embodiments, the material is packaged as a device including: a pleated pack, flat sheets in a crossflow cassette, a spiral wound module, hollow fiber, a hollow fiber module, or as a sensor. In an embodiment, a device utilizes more than one different isoporous fluorinated material.
In one embodiment, the material or device comprising the material has a detectable response to a stimulus/stimuli.
In some embodiments, the material, or a device comprising the material, is used in a process wherein an analyte of interest is separated in a medium containing the analyte of interest contacting the material or device. In one such process, the analyte of interest is separated by binding and eluting. In another such process, solutes or suspended particles are separated by filtration. In another such process, both bind and elute and separation by filtration mechanisms are incorporated.
In some embodiments, the material, or a device comprising the material, is used in a process wherein an analyte of interest is detected in a medium containing the analyte of interest contacting the material or device. In one such process, the analyte of interest is detected by a response of the material/device to the presence of the analyte of interest.
In some embodiments, at least two different material are packaged together as a kit. In other embodiments, at least two devices comprising the material are packaged together as a kit.
In some embodiments, the material is immobilized to or integrated with a support or a textile.
A method for achieving the invention involves: dissolution of a block copolymer in at least one chemical solvent; dispensing the polymer solution onto a substrate or mold, or through a die or template; removal of at least a portion of the chemical solvent; exposure to a nonsolvent causing precipitation of at least a portion of the polymer, and optionally, a wash step.
Non-limiting examples of fluorination of polymer blocks after polymerization are provided below.
As shown above, step “A)” is the fluorination of poly(4-vinylpyridine) with 1,1,1,2,2,3,3,-heptafluoro-5-iodopentane wherein upon heating, the iodine on the 1,1,1,2,2,3,3,-heptafluoro-5-iodopentane is a leaving group for attachment to the nitrogen on the poly(4-vinlypyridine), resulting in a quaternized pyridine and fluorinated poly(4-vinylpyridine) block. Step “B)” is the fluorination of cis-1, 4 poly(isoprene) wherein upon heating 2,2,3-trifluoro-3-(trifluoromethyl)oxirane reacts to fluorinate the double bond of the poly(isoprene). In step “C)” the fluorination of 3, 4-poly (isoprene) in two steps: first, a hydroboration/oxidation reaction to introduce a hydroxyl group off the poly(isoprene) double bond, then an esterification reaction with heptafluorobutanoyl chloride wherein the chloride on heptafluorobutanoyl chloride is a leaving group, resulting the fluorinated poly(isoprene).
The first approach for producing the isoporous structures is the direct polymerization of fluorinated monomer units into the block copolymer. This is achieved with a partial or complete fraction of fluorine-containing monomer units polymerized directly in the polymer block(s). This approach directly incorporates the fluorinated atoms through chemical bonding into the polymer which is subsequently processed into the isoporous material. Another similar approach is initiating or terminating the polymerization with a fluorinated molecule or macromolecule to fluorinate the copolymer with a single unit.
Another approach is chemically modifying a block copolymer not containing fluorinated units to include fluorine atoms in at least one block. This fluorine-modified (fluorinated) copolymer is subsequently processed into the fluorinated isoporous material. The fluorinated units are introduced by reaction to the multiblock polymer with a compound, such as, but not limited to, fluorine-containing compounds wherein the compound contains another halide such as bromine, chlorine, or iodine which serves as a leaving group for attachment to the polymer (e.g. 1,1,1,2,2,3,3-heptafluoro-5-iodopentane, 1,1,1,2,2,3,3,4,4,5,5,6,6,7,7,8,8-heptadecafluoro-10-iododecane perfluoropropyliodide, heptafluorobutanoyl chloride); fluorine; hexafluoropropylene oxide; sulfur tetrafluoride; difluorocarbene; trifluoroacetic anhydride; and difluoroacetic anhydride.
A still further approach for the fabrication of the isoporous material is post-modifying isoporous block copolymer materials to incorporate fluorine atoms. One such approach is the chemical modification of isoporous material to include fluorine atoms. This method involves directly chemically modifying the isoporous material, such that surfaces of the polymer block, including pore surfaces are modified. The aforementioned compounds are also suitable for this approach.
Combinations of these approaches are also used to achieve the isoporous material. For example, fluorinated monomer is polymerized to fluorinate one block of the copolymer, and subsequently another unfluorinated block is post-fluorinated.
The amount of fluorination and chemistry of the fluorinated material is controllable. This is controlled through varying the amount of fluorinated reagents relative to unfluorinated material during either polymerization or post-functionalization.
One variant is partially or completely fluorinating units of more than one block of the constituent copolymer. Which block(s) is/are fluorinated is not limited to the block that comprises the structure's major surface. Crosslinking with a fluorinated compound is another approach to imparting chemical resistance to membranes, through a combination of cross-linking and fluorination.
The pore size of the isoporous region of the membrane is also controllable. The pore size can be varied from ˜1-200 nm.
Isoporous block copolymer membranes incorporating fluorination in/on at least a portion of at least one block of the block copolymer. This imparts chemical resistance and antifouling properties to the membranes.
The polymers may be synthesized in any manner with the proviso that the polymer can self-assemble and form the isoporous material through the described methods.
The present application claims the benefit of priority to U.S. Provisional Patent application 62/505,589, filed May 12, 2017, the entirety of which is incorporated herein by reference.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2018/032118 | 5/10/2018 | WO |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2018/209121 | 11/15/2018 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3673272 | Dean | Jun 1972 | A |
4014798 | Rembaum | Mar 1977 | A |
4399035 | Nohmi et al. | Aug 1983 | A |
4666991 | Matsui et al. | May 1987 | A |
4720343 | Walch et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
4880441 | Kesting et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
5114585 | Kraus et al. | May 1992 | A |
5130024 | Fujimoto et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5158721 | Allegrezza et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5647989 | Hayashi et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5700902 | Hancock et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5700903 | Hancock et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5792227 | Kahlbaugh et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5805425 | Peterson | Sep 1998 | A |
5907017 | Ober | May 1999 | A |
5928792 | Moya | Jul 1999 | A |
6033370 | Reinbold et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6241886 | Kitagawa et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6354443 | Moya | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6379796 | Uenishi et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6503958 | Hughes et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6565782 | Wang et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6592764 | Stucky et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6592991 | Wiesner et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6663584 | Griesbach, III et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
7056455 | Matyjaszewski et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7438193 | Yang et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7927810 | Togawa et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
8025960 | Dubrow et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8147685 | Pritchard | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8206601 | Bosworth et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8294139 | Marsh et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8939294 | Moore et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
9162189 | Aamer et al. | Oct 2015 | B1 |
9169361 | Aamer | Oct 2015 | B1 |
9193835 | Aamer | Nov 2015 | B1 |
9441078 | Aamer | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9469733 | Aamer et al. | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9527041 | Wiesner et al. | Dec 2016 | B2 |
10711111 | Wiesner | Jul 2020 | B2 |
10912868 | Ushiro et al. | Feb 2021 | B2 |
20030073158 | Ma | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030171560 | Peters | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030226818 | Dunbar | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040065607 | Wang et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040122388 | McCormack et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040126778 | Lemmens et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040129678 | Crowley et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040138323 | Stenzel-Rosebaum et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040242822 | Gawrisch et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20060014902 | Mays et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060085062 | Lee et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060094598 | Simon | May 2006 | A1 |
20060151374 | Wu et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060283092 | Chinone | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070029256 | Nakano et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070265174 | Schlenoff | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070287241 | Takahashi et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080097271 | Lo et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080193818 | Mays | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080261255 | Tolosa et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090173694 | Peinemann et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090181315 | Spatz et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090208726 | Yang et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090209726 | Matsumoto et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090239381 | Nishimi et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20100051546 | Vuong et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100108599 | Vizvardi et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100167271 | Ryan | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100181288 | Tang et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100219383 | Eklund | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100224555 | Hoek et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20110130478 | Warren et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110240550 | Moore et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110275077 | James et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120048799 | Na et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120318741 | Peinemann et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130053748 | Cotton | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130112613 | Kang et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130129972 | Xu | May 2013 | A1 |
20130193075 | Liang et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130344375 | Brant et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140005364 | Gottschall et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140217012 | Wiesner | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140363572 | Moll et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140371698 | Chang et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150151256 | Abetz | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150343395 | Aamer et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150343398 | Aamer et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160023171 | Phillip et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160229969 | Wiesner et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160288062 | Ait-Haddou et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160319158 | Fleury et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160375409 | Stasiak et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170022337 | Wiesner et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170105877 | Buteux et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170327649 | Wiesner et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20180043314 | Onyemauwa et al. | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180043656 | Song et al. | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20190233307 | Fujimura et al. | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20200238227 | Dorin | Jul 2020 | A1 |
20200339770 | Wiesner | Oct 2020 | A1 |
20210040281 | Dorin | Feb 2021 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2886437 | May 2014 | CA |
3022510 | Nov 2017 | CA |
201211329 | Mar 2009 | CN |
101460203 | Jun 2009 | CN |
101516481 | Aug 2009 | CN |
101969902 | Feb 2011 | CN |
102224163 | Oct 2011 | CN |
102892486 | Jan 2013 | CN |
103797053 | May 2014 | CN |
104159657 | Nov 2014 | CN |
104768506 | Jul 2015 | CN |
105273211 | Jan 2016 | CN |
105536580 | May 2016 | CN |
106344539 | Jan 2017 | CN |
102012207338 | Nov 2013 | DE |
102014213027 | Jan 2016 | DE |
2160946 | Mar 2010 | EP |
2703016 | Mar 2014 | EP |
2705077 | Mar 2014 | EP |
2977101 | Jan 2016 | EP |
3056260 | Aug 2016 | EP |
3 284 529 | Feb 2018 | EP |
3541500 | Sep 2019 | EP |
3544720 | Oct 2019 | EP |
3658262 | Jun 2020 | EP |
3037071 | Dec 2016 | FR |
54-145766 | Nov 1979 | JP |
04-022428 | Jan 1992 | JP |
09-048861 | Feb 1997 | JP |
2002-537422 | Nov 2002 | JP |
2005-500132 | Jan 2005 | JP |
2006-175207 | Jul 2006 | JP |
2011-117956 | Jun 2011 | JP |
2011-131208 | Jul 2011 | JP |
2011-189229 | Sep 2011 | JP |
2012-246162 | Dec 2012 | JP |
2015-083299 | Apr 2015 | JP |
2015-167914 | Sep 2015 | JP |
2016-514049 | May 2016 | JP |
2016-526089 | Sep 2016 | JP |
2017-153616 | Sep 2017 | JP |
2018-500401 | Jan 2018 | JP |
2019-514687 | Jun 2019 | JP |
10-2009-0088124 | Aug 2009 | KR |
10-2012-0047269 | May 2012 | KR |
10-2012-0124412 | Nov 2012 | KR |
2012-0124412 | Nov 2012 | KR |
10-2016-0020404 | Feb 2016 | KR |
10-2018-0019059 | Feb 2018 | KR |
10201706492 | Mar 2018 | SG |
11201904425 | Jun 2019 | SG |
11202000664 | Feb 2020 | SG |
2005082501 | Sep 2005 | WO |
WO 2005091755 | Oct 2005 | WO |
2008034487 | Mar 2008 | WO |
2010051150 | May 2010 | WO |
2011098851 | Aug 2011 | WO |
2011111679 | Sep 2011 | WO |
2011123033 | Oct 2011 | WO |
2012151482 | Nov 2012 | WO |
2014164793 | Oct 2014 | WO |
2015048244 | Apr 2015 | WO |
2015168409 | Nov 2015 | WO |
2015188225 | Dec 2015 | WO |
2016023765 | Feb 2016 | WO |
2016031834 | Mar 2016 | WO |
2016066661 | May 2016 | WO |
2017189697 | Nov 2017 | WO |
2018043209 | Mar 2018 | WO |
2018055801 | Mar 2018 | WO |
2018093714 | May 2018 | WO |
2018097988 | May 2018 | WO |
2019023135 | Jan 2019 | WO |
2019178045 | Sep 2019 | WO |
2019178077 | Sep 2019 | WO |
2019195396 | Oct 2019 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Radjabian, Polymer, 55 (2014), 2986-2997 (Year: 2014). |
Ren et al, J. Am. Chem. Soc, 1998, 120, 6830-6831 (Year: 1998). |
VolKer Abetz, “Isoporous Block Copolymer Membranes,” Macromolecular Rapid Communications, vol. 36, pp. 10-22, 2015. |
Kharitonov et al., “Surface modification of polymers by direct fluorination: A convenient approach to improve commercial properties of polymeric articles,” Pure Appl. Chem., vol. 81, No. 3, pp. 451-471, 2009. |
Shahkaramipour et al., “Membranes with Surface-Enhanced Antifouling Properties for Water Purification,” Membranes, vol. 7, pp. 13, 2017. |
Lu{acute over (b)}omir et al., “Deposition of polymeric perfluored thin films in proton ionic membranes by plasma processes,” Applied Surface Science, vol. 254, pp. 173-176, 2007. |
A Bruil et al., “The Mechanisms of Leukocyte Removal by Filtration.” Transfusion Medicine Reviews vol. IX No. 2, pp. 145-166, Apr. 1995. |
A. A. Shukla et al., “Recent Advances in Large-Scale Production of Monoclonal Antibodies and Related Proteins.” Trends in Biotechnology, vol. 28, No. 5, pp. 253-261, 2010. |
A.S. Devonshire et al., “Towards Standardisation of Cell-Free DNA Measurement in Plasma: Controls for Extraction Efficiency, Fragment Size Bias and Quantification.” Anal. Bioanal. Chem., vol. 406, pp. 6499-6512, 2014. |
Behler, Ansgar (Edited by), “Poren,” Rompp Verlag, Rompp online 4.0, Aug. 2005, retrieved from Internet: URL: https://roempp.thieme.de/roempp4.0/do/data/RD-16-03734. |
Breiner et al, “Structural Characterization of the “Knitting Pattern” in Polystyrene-block-poly(ethylene-co-butylene)-block-poly(methyl methacrylate) Triblock Copolymers”, Macromolecules 1998, 31, 135-141. |
Clodt et al., “Performance study of isoporous membranes with tailored pore sizes”, Journal of Membrane Science, vol. 495, Jul. 29, 2015, pp. 334-340. |
D. Keskin, et al., “Postmodification of PS-b-P4VP Diblock Copolymer Membranes by ARGET ATRP.” Langmuir, vol. 30, pp. 8907-8914, Jun. 19, 2014. |
Dai et al., “Fabrication of 2D ordered structure of self-assembled block copolymers containing gold nanoparticles,” Journal of Crystal Growth, vol. 288, No. 1, pp. 128-136, Feb. 2, 2006. |
Doan Minh Y Nhi, “Investigation of the Effects of UV-Crosslinking on Isoporous Membrane Stability.” KTH Chemical Science and Engineering, pp. 1-46, 2011. |
E. Gifford et al., “Sensitivity Control of Optical Fiber Biosensors Utilizing Turnaround Point Long Period Gratings with Self-Assembled Polymer Coatings.” Proceedings of the SPIE, vol. 6659 pp. 66590D-1-66590D-9 Sep. 30, 2007. |
F. A. Carey, Ornanic Chemistry, Fifth Edition, pp. 859-860, 2003. |
Fink, Johannes Karl. Handbook of Engineering and Specialty Thermoplastics. 2011. vol. 2, Water Soluble Polymers. Chapter 7. p. 189-192. (Year: 2011). |
H. Ahlbrecht et al., “Stereoselective synthesis. Methods of Organic Chemistry.” Houben-Weyl, vol. E 21 a, 4th Edition Supplement, 1995. |
H. Sai et al., “Hierarchical Porous Polymer Scaffolds from Block Copolymers.” Science, vol. 341, pp. 530-533, Aug. 2, 2013. |
Hanselmann, Blockcopolymere, ROMPP Online, Version 3.37, Dokumentkennung RD-02-02007. Jul. 1, 2009. |
Hilke et al., “Block copolymer/homopolymer dual-layer hollow fiber membranes”, Journal of Membrane Science, vol. 472, Aug. 23, 2014, pp. 39-44. |
Hoek et al., Physical-chemical properties, separation performance, and fouling resistance of mixed-matrix ultrafiltration member, Desalination, Elsevier, vol. 283, pp. 89-99. May 4, 2011. |
Huang Yan et al: “Highly Ordered Mesoporous Carbonaceous Frameworks from a Template of a Mixed Amphiphilic Triblock-Copolymer System of PEO-PPO-PEO and Reverse PPO-PEO-PPO”, Chemistry—An Asian Journal, vol. 2, No. 10, Oct. 1, 2007 (Oct. 1, 2007), pp. 1282-1289. |
J. I. Clodt et al., “Carbohydrates as Additives for the Formation of Isoporous PS-b-P4VP Diblock Copolymer Membranes.” Macromolecular Rapid Communications, vol. 34, 190-194, 2013. |
J. Suzuki et al., “Morphology of ABC Triblock Copolymer/Homopolymer Blend Systems.” Journal of Polymer Science Part B: Polymer Physics vol. 40 pp. 1135-1141 Apr. 22, 2002. |
Julie N.L. Albert et al. “Self-assembly of block copolymer thin films”, Materialstoday, vol. 13, is. 6, Jun. 2010, pp. 24-33. |
Jung et al., Structure Formation of Integral Asymmetric Composite Membranes of Polystyrene-block-Poly(2-vinylpuridine) on a Nonwoven, Macromolecular Materials and Engineering, vol. 297, No. 8, pp. 790-798. Feb. 9, 2012. |
Kanegsberg, “Washing, Rinsing, and Drying: Items to Consider for the Optimization of Your Cleaning Process,” https://www.materialstoday.com/metal-finishing/features/washing-rinsing-and-drying-items-to-consider-for/, Sep. 1, 2005. p. 2, paragraph 6. |
Karunakaran et al. “IsoporousIPS-b-PEO ultrafiltration membranes via self-assembly and water-induced phase separatioln” Journal of Membrane Science, vol. 453 Issue 1 (Nov. 16, 2013): pp. 471-477. |
Khademi, M. Application of Tubular Crssflow Microfiltration in Harvesting Microalgae. LSU Master's Theses. 2014, pp. 39-43. |
Laboratory-Equipment.com, “Applications for Laboratory Ovens Across the Sciences.” https://www.laboratory-equipment.com/blog/all-laboratory-equipment-blogs/applications-for-laboratory-ovens-across-the-sciences/, Oct. 15, 2015, p. 1, section “Standard and Specialized Lab Oven Applications”. |
Lawrence E. Nielsen, “Cross-Linking-Effect on Physical Properties of Polymers.” Journal of Marcomolecular Science Part C, vol. 3(1 ), pp. 69-103, 2008. |
Li Yuk Mun et al: “Asymmetric Membranes from Two Chemically Distinct Triblock Terpolymers Blended during Standard Membrane Fabrication”, Macromolecular Rapid Communications, vol. 37, No. 20, Oct. 1, 2016 (Oct. 1, 2016), pp. 1689-1693. |
Mu X. et al., Nano-porous Nitrocellulose Liquid Bandage Modulates Cell and Cytokine Response and Accelerates Cutaneous Wound Healing in a Mouse Model. Carbohydr Polym., Sep. 25, 2015, vol. 136, pp. 618-629. |
N. Lefevre et al., “Self-Assembly in Thin Films of Mixtures of Block Copolymers and Homopolymers Interacting by Hydrogen Bonds.” Macromolecules, vol. 43, No. 18, pp. 7734-7743 Aug. 17, 2010. |
Parul Jain et.al., “Protein purification with polymeric affinity membranes containing functionalized poly (acid) brushes”, Biomacromolecules, 2010, vol. 11, No. 4, 1019-1026. |
Peinemann et al, “Asymmetric superstructure formed in a block copolymer via phase separation”, Nature Materials, V6, Dec. 2007, pp. 992-996. |
Phillip, W., et al., Tuning Structure and Properties of Graded Triblock Terpolymer-Based Mesoporous and Hybrid Films, Nano Letters, Jun. 7, 2011, Nov. 11, pp. 2892-2900. |
Qiu et al. “Selective Separation of Similarly Sized Proteins with Tunable Nanoporous Block Copolymer Membranes.” ACS Nano. vol. 7, No. 1, 2013. p. 768-776 (Year: 2013). |
R. van Reis et al., “High Performance Tangential Flow Filtration.” Biotechnology and Bioengineering, vol. 56, No. 1, pp. 71-82, Oct. 5, 1997. |
Roland et al., “Supplementary Information Block Copolymer/Homopolymer Dual-Layer Hollow Fiber Membranes Imaging and Characterization Lab and c Water Desalination”, Aug. 23, 2014, pp. 1-3. |
S. Breitbach et al., “Direct Quantification of Cell-Free, Circulating DNA from Unpurified Plasma.” PLOS One, vol. 9, Issue 3, e87838. pp. 1-11. |
S. P. Nunes et al., “From Micelle Supramolecular Assemblies in Selective Solvents to Isoporous Membranes.” Langmuir, DOI 10.1021/la201439P, Jun. 28, 2011. |
S. Rangou et al., “Self-Organized Isoporous Membranes with Tailored Pore Sizes.” Journal of Membrane Science, vol. 451, pp. 266-275, 2014. |
Tiraferri et al., Binding Silver and Silica Nanoparticles to Polymeric Membrane Surfaces for Novel Anti-Biofouling Properties, ACS Division Proceedings, Division of Polymer Chemistry, Meeting 242, Aug. 28-Sep. 1, 2011, Denver, CO, USA. Sep. 1, 2011. |
Wang Zhaogen et al: “Isoporous membranes with gradient porosity by selective swelling of UV-crosslinked block copolymers”, Journal of Membrane Science, vol. 476, Feb. 1, 2015 (Feb. 1, 2015), pp. 449-456. |
Y Nhi et al., “Investigation of the Effect of UV-Crosslin King on Isoporous Membrane Stability”, Chemical Science and Engineering, vol. 46, Dec. 12, 2011. |
Yizhou Zhang et al: “Nanoporous membranes generated from self-assembled block polymer precursors: Quo Vadis?”, Journal of Applied Polymer Science, vol. 132, No. 21, Jun. 5, 2015. |
Yizhou Zhang, et al., “Microfiltration and Ultrafiltration Membrane Science and Technology”. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, app. 41683, on. 1-17, 2015. |
Young et al., Robert J., Introduction to Polymers, Third Edition, CRC Press 2011, pp. 6-9 and 456-457. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200199264 A1 | Jun 2020 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62505589 | May 2017 | US |