The present invention is directed to child-resistant packages, to closures and containers for such packages, and to methods of making such packages, closures and containers.
Child-resistant packages are conventionally employed for prescription vials, vitamin bottles, and a number of other applications including containers for caustic or hazardous materials. The present invention pertains particularly to those types of child-resistant packages that involve application of axial pressure and simultaneous turning of the closure with respect to the container in order to remove the closure from the container. The present invention involves a number of features or aspects in a child-resistant closure, container or package, which may be implemented separately from, or more preferably, in combination with each other.
A child-resistant package includes a container having a finish with an open end, at least one external thread, at least one stop lug projecting radially outwardly from the finish, and a closure having a base wall, a skirt with at least one internal thread for engagement with the thread on the container finish, at least one spring element and at least one pair of internal lugs on the skirt. Each pair of lugs on the skirt includes a first lug that cooperates with the stop lug on the container finish to prevent unthreading of the closure from the finish absent pressure on the closure against the spring element to push the first lug on the skirt beneath the corresponding stop lug on the container finish. Each pair of lugs on the skirt also preferably includes a second lug circumferentially spaced from the first lug that cooperates with the stop lug on the container finish to prevent “over-threading” or over tightening of the closure on the finish. Accordingly, the first lug provides a child-resistant feature requiring the closure to be pressed and turned in order to remove it from the container finish. The second lug provides a thread-stop feature which limits the extent to which the closure can be threaded onto the container finish, to prevent damage to the lugs, threads and spring.
In one exemplary embodiment of a child-resistant package, the stop lug on the container finish and the first lug on the closure skirt have circumferentially extending and axially inclined cam surfaces. During the range of engagement of the first lug with the stop lug as the closure is threaded or rotated onto the container, the closure is increasingly displaced toward the container against the bias of the spring element, until the first lug on the closure passes the stop lug on the container finish whereupon the spring element biases the closure away from the container. Accordingly, in this arrangement, the first lug on the closure skirt slides or cams under the stop lug on the container finish. In another exemplary embodiment of a child-resistant container package, the first lug on the closure skirt has a radially inclined cam surface that engages the stop lug and causes the first lug on the closure skirt to cam radially outwardly over the stop lug on the container finish. In both embodiments, after the first lug on the closure skirt passes the stop lug on the container finish, reverse rotation of the closure is prevented by engagement of the first lug with the stop lug, unless a sufficient axial force is provided on the closure, against the spring element, to move the first lug beneath the stop lug on the container finish.
In another exemplary embodiment of a child-resistant packages a flange is provided on the container finish. The flange is constructed and arranged to overlie the first lug on the container finish when it is rotated past the stop lug as the closure is threaded onto the container. The flange preferably extends from the stop lug and closely overlies the first lug on the closure skirt to inhibit or prevent the closure from being partially axially displaced or cocked relative to the container, to avoid damage to the threads and lugs, and to prevent the closure from being removed from the container without application of the required push and turn forces on the closure.
These and other objects, features, advantages and aspects of the present invention will be apparent from the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments and best mode, appended claims and accompanying drawings in which:
Referring in more detail to the drawings, FIGS. 1 and 3-5 illustrate a child-resistant package 30 that includes a container 32 and a closure 34 received on the container 32. When the closure 34 is fully received on the container 32, interfering lugs on both the closure 34 and the container 32 prevent the closure 34 from being simply rotated off of a container finish 36. Rather, to remove the closure 34 from the container 32, the closure 34 must be pushed down until lugs on the closure 34 clear lugs on the container 32 so that the closure 34 may be rotated relative to the container 32. Preferably, the lugs on the closure 34 and container 32 also interfere axially to prevent the closure 34 from being cocked or partially removed without rotating the closure relative to the container 32. (Directional words such as “down” are employed by way of description and not limitation with respect to the upright orientation of the package illustrated, for example, in
The container 32 includes a body 40 defining an interior volume in which a product is stored, and a generally cylindrical finish 36 with an open end 42. On the finish 36 are provided at least one external thread 44 and at least one stop lug 46 separate from the thread 44 and projecting radially outwardly from the finish 36. As shown in
In the preferred embodiment, each stop lug 46 is preferably located adjacent to but circumferentially spaced from a second end 50 of a separate one of the threads 44. As best shown in
As best shown in
Carried by and preferably attached to one or both of the base wall 70 and the skirt 72 is at least one spring element 76 that yieldably axially biases the closure 34 in a direction moving the base wall 70 away from the finish 36. The spring element 76 is preferably integrally formed as a single component with the closure 34 that extends axially away from the base wall 70 and radially inwardly terminating at a free edge 78 so that the spring element 76 is flexible and resilient. Each spring element 76, which are identical, preferably tapers in thickness toward the free edge of the spring element to provide differential flexing of the spring element. That is, the free edge of the spring element initially will flex as shown in
To prevent over-flexing or plastic deformation of the spring element 76, circumferentially spaced and axially extending spring stops 80 are preferably provided on the base wall 70 of the closure 34 to limit the flexing or axial displacement of the spring element 76. In the preferred embodiment, as best shown in
Adjacent its axially lower end, the skirt 72 may include a radially outwardly extending portion 84 providing a larger inner diameter than in the remainder of the skirt 72. The larger inner diameter may be provided to accommodate a plurality of lugs on the closure 34 which cooperate with the stop lugs 46 on the container finish 36 as set forth in more detail below. The skirt 72 has a stepped profile that includes a first portion on which the at least one thread 74 is disposed, and the radially outwardly extending portion, or second portion, 84 being connected to the first portion by inner and outer shoulders. The second portion 84 terminates at an open end of the skirt opposite of the base wall 70 and is stepped to extend radially outwardly from the first portion. The second portion 84 includes an outer diameter larger than that of the first portion, and an inner diameter larger than that of the first portion.
In the preferred embodiment of the package 30, the closure 34 includes at least one pair of internal lugs 86, 88 extending radially inwardly from the skirt 72. More specifically, the lugs 86, 88 are disposed on the second portion 84 of the skirt 72, and include a first lug 86 positioned proximate and just axially above the open end of the skirt, and a second lug 88 circumferentially spaced from the first lug 86 and positioned proximate and just axially below the inner shoulder of the closure skirt 72. As best shown in
As shown in
As shown in
To put the closure 34 on the container 32, the closure skirt 72 is aligned with and disposed over a portion of the container finish 36. The closure 34 is then rotated clockwise with the internal threads 74 on the closure skirt 72 engaging the external threads 44 on the container finish 36 to axially advance the closure 34 on the finish 36. Rotation of the closure 34 continues until, as shown in
As shown in FIGS. 1 and 3-5, this disposes the first lug 86 on the closure skirt 72 in the pocket 64 of a corresponding stop lug 46 with the upper surface 96 of the first lug 86 adjacent to and preferably engaged with the flange 58 of the stop lug 46. As shown in
With the closure 34 fully received on the container 32, simple counterclockwise rotation of the closure 34 will engage the stop surface 98 of the first lug 86 with the axial surface 62 of the stop lug 46 that defines in part the pocket 64 thus preventing further counterclockwise rotation of the closure 34 as best shown in
Since simple counterclockwise rotation of the closure 34 to remove it from the container finish 36 is prevented by engagement of the first lug 86 and the stop lug 46, the closure 34 must be displaced axially downwardly against the force of the spring element 76 a sufficient distance so that the first lugs 86 are axially beneath and clear of the stop lug 46 on the container finish 36. Then, the closure 34 can be rotated counterclockwise passing the first lugs 86 beneath their associated stop lugs 46 and backing the closure 34 off of the container finish 36 through action of the cooperating threads 44, 74 on the finish 36 and skirt 72.
Desirably, the axially inclined cam surfaces 52, 90 of both the stop lugs 46 and the first lugs 86 displace or flex the spring element 76 as the first lugs 86 cam beneath the stop lugs 46, and do not cause any distortion of the container finish 36 or closure skirt 72 due to the forces required to slide the cam surfaces 52, 90 relative to each other. And to prevent damage to the spring element 76 or individual spring segments 82 of the spring element 76, the spring stops 80 limit the extent to which each spring segment 82 can be displaced or flexed.
Each stop lug 162 on the container finish 174, as best shown in
As shown in
There have thus been disclosed a child-resistant package, a closure, a container, and a method of making a child-resistant package. Two presently preferred embodiments of the invention have been disclosed, and a number of modifications and variations have been discussed. Those skilled in the art will readily recognize that the description of the presently preferred embodiments and the suggested modifications and variations have been set forth in terms of description, and not limitation. Other embodiments, modifications and variations will readily suggest themselves to persons of ordinary skill in the art. The invention is intended to embrace all such embodiments, modifications and variations that fall within the sprit and broad scope of the appended claims. Further, descriptive adjectives used in the specification, such as for example, beneath, above, clockwise, counterclockwise and the like, are used with reference to the package, closure and container as shown in the accompanying drawings, and generally provide the container in an upright position with the closure positioned on and over the open end of the container finish.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3297185 | Plymale | Jan 1967 | A |
3335923 | Healy | Aug 1967 | A |
3339770 | Weigand | Sep 1967 | A |
3485403 | Hedgewick et al. | Dec 1969 | A |
3608763 | Smith et al. | Sep 1971 | A |
3610454 | Malick | Oct 1971 | A |
3720342 | Vercillo | Mar 1973 | A |
3809276 | Landen | May 1974 | A |
3880313 | Akers | Apr 1975 | A |
3880314 | Akers | Apr 1975 | A |
3917096 | Hedgewick | Nov 1975 | A |
3944102 | Grau | Mar 1976 | A |
3951289 | Landen | Apr 1976 | A |
3952899 | Cooke | Apr 1976 | A |
3979001 | Bogert | Sep 1976 | A |
4032028 | Reiss et al. | Jun 1977 | A |
4053077 | DeFelice | Oct 1977 | A |
4084716 | Bogert | Apr 1978 | A |
4090629 | Hedgewick | May 1978 | A |
4091948 | Northup | May 1978 | A |
4128184 | Northup | Dec 1978 | A |
4139112 | Cooke | Feb 1979 | A |
4159779 | Hedgewick | Jul 1979 | A |
RE30625 | Akers | May 1981 | E |
4270664 | Buono | Jun 1981 | A |
4346809 | Kusz | Aug 1982 | A |
4353475 | Kachur et al. | Oct 1982 | A |
4360113 | Luker | Nov 1982 | A |
4375858 | Shah et al. | Mar 1983 | A |
4387817 | Wiles et al. | Jun 1983 | A |
4399920 | Swartzbaugh et al. | Aug 1983 | A |
4410097 | Kusz | Oct 1983 | A |
4434903 | Cooke | Mar 1984 | A |
4523688 | Puresevic et al. | Jun 1985 | A |
4553678 | Thorsbakken | Nov 1985 | A |
4560077 | Dutt | Dec 1985 | A |
4579238 | Herr | Apr 1986 | A |
4579239 | Hart | Apr 1986 | A |
4598835 | Brownbill | Jul 1986 | A |
4620640 | Swartzbaugh | Nov 1986 | A |
4627547 | Cooke | Dec 1986 | A |
4664273 | Simon | May 1987 | A |
4669624 | Wiles et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4674643 | Wilde et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4682700 | Montgomery et al. | Jul 1987 | A |
4739890 | Cooke | Apr 1988 | A |
4823967 | Thompson | Apr 1989 | A |
5020682 | Dutt | Jun 1991 | A |
5105960 | Crisci et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5133471 | Pujol Almirall | Jul 1992 | A |
5135124 | Wobser | Aug 1992 | A |
5147053 | Friedenthal | Sep 1992 | A |
5161706 | Weinstein | Nov 1992 | A |
5186344 | Cook | Feb 1993 | A |
5279434 | Aguirrezabal | Jan 1994 | A |
5317796 | Hunter | Jun 1994 | A |
5449078 | Akers | Sep 1995 | A |
5462186 | Ladina et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5687863 | Kusz | Nov 1997 | A |
5769268 | Kuzma et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5785195 | Zwemer et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5803287 | Kusz | Sep 1998 | A |
5836466 | Briere | Nov 1998 | A |
5915576 | Robinson | Jun 1999 | A |
6056143 | Stolzman | May 2000 | A |
6109466 | Carrier | Aug 2000 | A |
6152315 | Montgomery | Nov 2000 | A |
6327770 | Konefal et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6343705 | Minnette | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6378713 | Montgomery | Apr 2002 | B2 |
6446823 | Miceli et al. | Sep 2002 | B2 |
6450352 | DeJonge | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6503373 | Eerden et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6523709 | Miceli et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6983859 | Azzarello | Jan 2006 | B2 |
20010035388 | Miceli | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020062626 | Gregory | May 2002 | A1 |
20020162817 | Vassallo | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020166834 | Branson et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020195412 | Miceli | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030075519 | Miceli | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030098285 | Gregory | May 2003 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0042603 | Dec 1981 | EP |
0281284 | Sep 1988 | EP |
0528561 | Feb 1993 | EP |
1302406 | Aug 2003 | EP |
2108095 | May 1983 | GB |
2195620 | Apr 1988 | GB |
2203136 | Oct 1988 | GB |
2222821 | Mar 1990 | GB |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050121406 A1 | Jun 2005 | US |