The invention relates to screw-on container closures. More particularly, the invention relates to child-resistant closures.
Among numerous examples of child-resistant closures for small over-the-counter (OTC) medications (e.g., pills, capsules, tablets) is U.S. Pat. No. 5,671,853 of Herr, issued Sep. 30, 1997.
One aspect of the disclosure involves a child-resistant container system comprising a container body and a cap. The container body has: a sidewall; a mouth; an externally-threaded neck between the mouth and the body; and a pair of engagement features. The cap has: an internally threaded inner sidewall matable to the externally-threaded neck in an installed condition and unscrewable from the externally-threaded neck to a removed condition. An outer sidewall surrounds the inner wall and has a cross-section normal to the axis characterized by an opposite first pair of ends compressable from a relaxed condition to a compressed condition and an opposite second pair of ends, a direction between the second pair of ends being normal to a direction between the first pair of ends. A pair of engagement features are carried by the outer wall and engagable with the container body engagement features to prevent an unscrewing rotation with the cap in the installed condition and the outer sidewall in the relaxed condition. Compression of the first ends from the relaxed condition to the compressed condition shifts the cap engagement features radially outward to permit the unscrewing rotation from the installed condition. The cross-section of the cap is longer in a direction between the first ends than in a direction between the second ends.
The details of one or more embodiments of the invention are set forth in the accompanying drawings and the description below. Other features, objects, and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the description and drawings, and from the claims.
Like reference numbers and designations in the various drawings indicate like elements.
The exemplary closure 24 is a one-piece closure. An exemplary closure piece is molded plastic (e.g., injection molded). Exemplary plastics are polyolefins such as polypropylenes and polyethylenes. The closure may comprise an additional member such as an elastomeric or paper seal or gasket, safety seal, or the like.
The closure further comprises an outer sidewall 70 (
The exemplary body 22 and closure 24 have transversely elongate footprints. The exemplary body footprint (
To define frames of reference, for such a generally symmetric container, the neck central longitudinal axis 500 defines central longitudinal axis of the body 22 which is vertical in a normal storage position. With the transverse elongate footprint, a plane 502 (
The exemplary closure 24 footprint is, however, not elliptical. Rather, along what would have been the major axis of the ellipse footprint, end portions of the footprint are concave outward rather than convex outward to form the portions 72. As is discussed below, this helps gripping. The concavity may mean that actual cross-section/footprint length at the centerplane 512 is about the same as that at the centerplane 514. Overall footprint or cross-section length LC1 (
The closure outer sidewall 70 extends from a lower rim 80 (
As is discussed further below, the body and closure have two pairs of engagement features 120, 122 (
The exemplary engagement features 120 (
As is discussed further below, the surfaces 123 are ramp surfaces and the surfaces 124 are stop surfaces. The surfaces 124 are relatively radial or over-radial so as to cooperate with complementary surfaces of the closure engagement features 122 to resist unscrewing motion absent the aforementioned manipulation. The surfaces 123 allow the closure engagement features to override in a screwing/installing rotation as is discussed further below.
The surfaces 144 and 124 are sufficiently complementary to provide an opposite cooperation. During an attempt at unscrewing engagement without proper actuation, the surfaces 124 and 144 of adjacent projections abut and do not override
However, for unscrewing, the portions 72 may be squeezed inward (i.e., compressed inwardly toward each other and toward the plane 514). This compressing and inward shift causes a corresponding flexing of the portions 74 radially outward and shifting the closure projections 122 radially outboard of the body projections 120. In this condition, while maintaining compression between the portions 72, the closure may be unscrewed via an unscrewing rotation about the axis 500 with the each of the features 122 passing radially outboard and circumferentially past the features 120.
The heights (parallel to axis 500) of the projections 120 may be merely sufficient to provide sufficient strength for a desired resistance to opening. In the exemplary embodiment, they only have potential engagement with the projections 122 for a small portion of a single turn. With the exemplary thread, full removal can occur in one full turn.
In an installing rotation, one need not squeeze the portions 72. Instead, the junction regions 146 will engage the ramping surface 123 (and/or a curving transition to the apex region 130). The angling of the meeting surfaces is sufficient to flex the closure (e.g., radially outwardly flex the portions 74) to permit an overriding return to the installed condition.
The elongate cross-section may provide one or more of several advantages in use. First, compressing the long direction may be counterintuitive for a child. Particularly, a small child with small hands would tend to grasp across the portions 74 and compress them toward each other preventing unscrewing. Larger adult hands may be more amenable to compressing the portions 72. This is particularly the case when there are written instructions on the closure or where the optional gripping features such as lands 88 are located along the end portions 72. Also, the concavity of the portions 72, however, assists in gripping by a user with sufficiently large hands. Accordingly, this may be regarded as particularly useful for users with arthritis or other grip-related disability. However, the elongate nature of the body footprint allows easy intuitive gripping with the off hand. Thus less grip strength is required of the off hand on the body than with a round footprint body. Also, the elongate nature of the footprint of the closure allows for a greater amount of compression between the portions 72 than what may be found with corresponding portions of a circular outer sidewall close to the inner sidewall. This greater possible stroke may allow for lower compression forces.
One or more embodiments of the present invention have been described. Nevertheless, it will be understood that various modifications may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. For example, desirability of reusing existing molding and/or capping equipment may influence particular implementations. Accordingly, other embodiments are within the scope of the following claims.
Benefit is claimed of U.S. Patent Application No. 62/145,202, filed Apr. 9, 2015, and entitled “Child-Resistant Closure”, the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety as if set forth at length.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5671853 | Herr | Sep 1997 | A |
5687863 | Kusz | Nov 1997 | A |
5865330 | Buono | Feb 1999 | A |
5908125 | Opresco | Jun 1999 | A |
5915576 | Robinson | Jun 1999 | A |
5921417 | Mull | Jul 1999 | A |
5927526 | Herr | Jul 1999 | A |
6112779 | Camilla | Sep 2000 | A |
6112921 | Robinson | Sep 2000 | A |
6161711 | Miceli et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6168035 | McLelland | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6296130 | Forsyth et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6357615 | Herr | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6783014 | Luker | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6866164 | Branson et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6988642 | Gallo et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7097058 | Wellman et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7111746 | Miceli et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7334694 | Suffa | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7628283 | Shingle | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7628298 | Dewig et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7641064 | Robinson | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7731048 | Alvares et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7815062 | Suffa | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7828166 | Sprick | Nov 2010 | B1 |
7861873 | Bragg et al. | Jan 2011 | B1 |
8051999 | Carmody et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8079483 | Brozell et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8123058 | Brozell et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8240491 | Beecroft et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8245867 | Allen | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8292101 | Bragg et al. | Oct 2012 | B1 |
8371463 | Beecroft | Feb 2013 | B2 |
20050205607 | Hierzer | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20090223985 | Carmody | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20100025355 | Beecroft | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20120000879 | McFarlane et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20130097973 | McCoy | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20150129531 | Gatton | May 2015 | A1 |
20160159533 | Piscopo | Jun 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1357049 | Oct 2003 | EP |
9716358 | May 1997 | WO |
9850157 | Nov 1998 | WO |
0006454 | Feb 2000 | WO |
2004103877 | Dec 2004 | WO |
2006044003 | Apr 2006 | WO |
2008141163 | Nov 2008 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Applicant Admitted Prior Art: photos of generic atorvastatin containers, Mar. 18, 2015. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160297579 A1 | Oct 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62145202 | Apr 2015 | US |