Chime-In Protocol For Channel Access

Abstract

A network of stations uses bandwidth assigned to primary users on a secondary user basis. The stations having a status of needing to send information indicate a need for transmission access by transmitting, simultaneously with transmissions indicating a need for transmission access from other stations of the network, an indication of status to a master station. Each station indicating need for transmission access transmits that indication of status on a respectively different frequency. The master station then grants access to the transmission bandwidth to the requesting stations.

Description

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Field of the Invention

The invention is directed to communication systems and, more particularly to a channel access protocol for communication systems operating as secondary users in a primary user frequency band.

2. Description of the Prior Art

Some radio spectrum licensees have a plurality of adjacent or disjoint radio channels or combinations thereof to support communication services such as, for example, analog voice services. Typically, user channel allocations will have standard bandwidths of 6.25, 12.5-, 25- or 50-kHz or multiples thereof. One concern of licensees is the efficient utilization of their aggregate bandwidth. In the example of analog push-to-talk voice services, some have chosen to use fixed-frequency or manual channelized radios. While these radios are inexpensive, they may offer poor utilization of the radio channels if they have a dedicated frequency or frequency pair; if the user only uses the radio ten-percent of the time, then ninety-percent of the user channels' bandwidth is wasted.

In another example, frequencies from different primary users are utilized harvested for use on a secondary use basis

In the above examples, additional radios could share the frequencies by using a “listen-before-talk” user discipline. This will improve the spectral efficiency but some users may have to wait until the frequency becomes clear or manually adjust the frequency if the radio has that capability and try again. Trunked radios offer an improvement over the mechanisms described above. Trunked radios signal a repeater station and the repeater will select a clear channel for the caller. There are several trunking protocols that can be selected, all of which share a disadvantage also shared by other push-to-talk mechanisms: the channelization of the radios is inflexible and efficiency of band usage may be low.

The radios described above and similar radios are inflexible in that they must be used only on a channel of fixed bandwidth (such as 12.5- or 25-kHz) and must remain on the same frequency throughout the duration of the session, making higher utilization of the bandwidth difficult. In addition, these radios do not easily allow additional services such as Ethernet and IP (Internet Protocol) digital services to co-exist and use the bandwidth when not used by the radios.

PROBLEMS OF THE PRIOR ART

A class of radios can receive multiple carriers simultaneously. In one example, a point-to-multipoint multicarrier master station radio can receive a data stream spread over the multiple carriers. A common problem in point-to-multipoint networks is how to share the band in the remote-to-master station direction (upstream). Various solutions for sharing the upstream bandwidth (“access method”) have been implemented, such as TDMA, Aloha, slotted Aloha, and many others.

All these access methods have some sort of implicit or explicit signaling. TDMA has implicit signaling in the fixed TDMA frame structure. The remote stations use the TDMA clock to identify which slots in the frame are available for each site, based on a slot-numbering scheme and a site-numbering scheme. In one form of slotted Aloha, the master station signals that a message was lost by sending ACK and NAK signals based on message sequence numbers. All such signaling schemes exact a cost on network throughput due to the signaling overhead and the effectiveness of the bandwidth-sharing scheme. The efficiency of the signaling scheme can be affected by many factors, including transit delay (especially satellite or low-speed networks), round-trip signaling delay, raw bandwidth overhead, interaction with higher-layer protocol timers and others. The cost of the sharing scheme comes in the form of some combination of throughput, jitter, delay and other factors.

BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention is directed to improvements in cognitive radios of the type described in published US Patent Application, Serial No. 2004/0142696 A1, which is the parent of this application, and more particularly to improvements in channel access through use of a chime-in protocol.

The channel access techniques of the present invention have very low overhead. The techniques' efficiency comes because they enables all remote stations to signal their need for upstream bandwidth simultaneously. After a fixed frame period and any time that the master station completes transmitting, it broadcasts a signal after which all remote sites may signal for a brief period simultaneously, each in a designated frequency. The transmission need not contain any information. It can be a simple unmodulated carrier, indicating that the site needs to make a transmission. Remote stations or sites that need not transmit at the moment do not signal. During this brief period, the master station scans all of the carriers substantially simultaneously, noting which remotes did transmit. The carriers are the same frequencies used for frequency-hopping data transmissions.

The efficiency of this scheme can be attributed to three factors: the signaling period can be quite short, on the order of a few milliseconds, for all remote radios in the network to signal; all remote radios signal simultaneously over that short period; and the master station can initiate a signaling period as frequently or infrequently as needed.

In a preferred embodiment, remote stations use the following mechanism to select their designated signaling carrier frequency: a site's assigned Site ID (assigned by the Network Management System) is used as an index into the current hopping sequence used. For example, the remote site with Site ID ‘3’ would signal in the third carrier in the present hopping sequence. To further amplify the example, if the hopping sequence happened to be hopping channels 7, 8, 11, 15, 22, 28, . . . and so on, then remote site 3 would use hopping channel 11 (assuming the site IDs started with ‘1’ rather than ‘0’).

As described earlier, in the present invention the network uses a dynamic frequency hopping sequence based on interference measurements. In one embodiment, a spectral reuse transceiver of the type described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/730,753 is used. A pseudo-random sequence is used to select hopping channels in the band that are not busy. If, for example, the network is using 20 hopping channels simultaneously to achieve the desired bandwidth, it will select twenty of the available hopping channels out of the available (non-busy) hopping channels and transmit in those hopping channels for a dwell period. It will then select another set of twenty available hopping channels out of the available hopping channels and use those during the next dwell period. This process continues until ongoing spectral analysis detects a change to the list of available hopping channels (new interference or formerly busy or blocked hopping channels become available). After that time, new hopping sequences are used in the network, to take into account the changes in interference caused by stations, not within the network, becoming active or inactive.

The selection of a signaling channel for a particular site, as described earlier, is based on the current hopping sequence. If there are more sites than hopping channels in the present sequence (due to the number of simultaneous hopping channels needed or restrictions due to interference), the signaling will, in the preferred embodiment, occur in cycles. For example, if 20 hopping channels are used in the hopping sequence and there are 32 remote sites, sites 1-20 will signal in the first signaling period; in the second signaling period, sites 21-32 will signal. In the preferred embodiment, the master station will signal for cycle 1 of the signaling period, and after that period has ended will signal immediately for cycle 2. By this method, large numbers of sites can signal, adding only a few milliseconds to the signaling period per twenty sites (in the present example).

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

A preferred embodiment of the invention will now be described with reference to the following figures.

FIG. 1 illustrates a network architecture in accordance with one aspect of the invention.

FIG. 2 illustrates mapping of bandwidth associated with a plurality of user channels into a plurality of frequency hopping channels.

FIG. 3A shows a first band plan in which user channels are overlaid with a plurality of hopping channels in one arrangement.

FIG. 3B shows a second band plan in which user channels are overlaid with a plurality of hopping channels in a different arrangement.

FIG. 4 is a timing diagram showing how a clear channel list is generated.

FIG. 5 shows how a beacon preamble message is organized.

FIG. 6 shows how an initialization burst is organized.

FIG. 7 shows how a data message burst is organized.

FIG. 8 shows generation of multicarrier ticklers.

FIG. 9 shows a channel access mechanism utilized in published US Patent Application, Serial No. 2004/0142696 A1.

FIG. 10 illustrates a high-level transmission protocol for use in carrying out communications between a master and remote units in accordance with one aspect of the invention.

FIG. 11 illustrates the components of the master station transmit portion of the FIG. 10 protocol.

FIG. 12 illustrates the remote transmit portion of the FIG. 10 protocol.

FIG. 13 illustrates how chime-in requests for channel access are generated and how chime-in frequencies are assigned to remote stations in accordance with one aspect of the invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

Before describing in detail the particular improved band utilization and improved interference avoidance mechanisms in accordance with the present invention, it should be observed that the present invention resides primarily in a novel operational situation, namely, aggregation of user channels or harvesting of unused bandwidth in one or more bands and not in the particular detailed configurations thereof. Accordingly, the structure, control and arrangement of these conventional improvements have been illustrated in the drawings by readily understandable diagrams which show only those specific details that are pertinent to the present invention, so as not to obscure the disclosure with structural details which will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art having the benefit of the description herein. Thus, the illustrations of the figures do not necessarily represent the mechanical structural arrangement of the exemplary system, but are primarily intended to illustrate the major structural and functional components of the system in a convenient functional grouping, whereby the present invention may be more readily understood.

FIG. 1 illustrates a network architecture in accordance with one aspect of the invention. As shown in FIG. 1, there is a master site transceiver 10 (also called a master or a master station) and a plurality of remote site transceivers 12 (also called remotes). In the embodiment shown, each remote site transceiver communicates only with the master site transceiver although other network arrangements are reflected in the invention in which remote sites may communicate with the master site through other site transceivers. Additionally, remote sites may communicate among themselves in other non-preferred embodiments of the invention.

Each of the transceivers 10 and 12 illustrated in FIG. 1 use multiple frequencies of a random access discrete address set for signalling sets of supervisory conditions. The particular frequencies utilized for communication using frequency hopping among the multiple frequencies of the random access discrete address set are described more hereinafter.

Referring now to FIG. 2, a diagram, generally indicated by 10, illustrates an exemplary overlaying of an aggregation of user channels with 6.25 kHz hopping channels. A radio band, generally indicated by 11, has a plurality of allocated user channels 14 to one or more licensees. (This differentiates herein allocated “user channels” from “hopping channels”; “hopping channels” are the overlay frequency hopping channels that a frequency hopping radio uses.) User channels 14 may include a mixture of bandwidths; in the non-limiting example of FIG. 2, the allocation of user channels includes 6.25, 12.5-, 25- and 50-kHz channels 14.

User channels 14 may be viewed as a channel space or aggregation, generally indicated by 15, comprising user channels 14 allocated to the licensee. Aggregation 15 may be viewed as a 6.25 kHz overlay, generally indicated by 16, wherein each 6.25 kHz user channel 25 is comprised of one 6.25 kHz frequency-hopping channel (“hopping channel”) 24 and each 12.5 kHz user channel 20 is comprised of two 6.25 kHz hopping channels 17. Similarly, each 25 kHz user channel 21 in aggregation 15 is comprised of two outer 6.25 hopping channels 18 and two inner 6.25 kHz hopping channels 19. Similarly, each 50 kHz user channel 22 in aggregation 15 is comprised of four outer 6.25 hopping channels 23 and four inner 6.25 kHz hopping channels 22.

The 6.25 kHz overlay 16 represents the set of 6.25 kHz hopping channels over which a radio comprising the present invention will frequency hop. However, the order of channel hopping can be modified from the order shown in the figure to lessen interference to silent receivers.

Aggregating a set of user channel allocations 14 or harvesting unused bandwidth form primary users provides many advantages if a selective frequency hopping radio, such as the present invention, is used rather than conventional fixed-frequency or manually agile radios. A frequency hopping radio can selectively hop over the entire allocation, gaining throughput efficiency due to the advantage of packet multiplexing, as will be understood by one skilled in the radio art. In the non-limiting example of voice applications, conventional analog push-to-talk radios can be blocked from completing a call if the correct type of allocation is not available. For example, if no 25-kHz user channel is available for a 25-kHz radio, the call will be blocked, even if there are two or more 12.5-kHz user channels available. By using a selective frequency-hopping digital radio, the entire pool of user channel allocations in the form of an aggregation 15 will be available to all radios. As will be known to one skilled in the radio art, digital radios can often provide voice, video and data services at adjustable or selectable quality of service and voice or image quality. In addition, spare capacity in the aggregated network may be used for a variety of data services, including Ethernet bridging and IP; this would not be readily available in conventional or trunked analog voice services.

A further advantage of the present invention is the optional application of interference detection to enable sharing of aggregation 15 by a mixture of conventional and digital radios, said digital radios comprising the present invention. While the interference-detection features of the present invention typically are used to avoid interfering with primary licensees or other secondary licensees, in an aggregation 15, the interference-detection features may be used to detect the activity of conventional radios that use user channels within aggregation 15 on an equal basis with other radios in the aggregation. Licensees may be motivated to allow a mixture of analog and digital radios due to the cost of complete equipment replacement; thus, some analog radios can continue to operate without change while the network enjoys the advantages of the present invention, improving spectral efficiency for new installations or replacement radios in a phased replacement program.

It should be noted that a single band is used in the example. However, the present invention anticipates that an aggregation 15 could be comprised of a plurality of bands. In such a case, aggregation 15 would operate in the same manner as a single band. As one skilled in the radio art will understand, a radio must be able to hop in (operate in) all the bands in the aggregation in order to enjoy the advantages of a multi-band aggregation. The present invention also contemplates harvesting unused bandwidth from a plurality of primary users.

It should be noted also that the term band has a wide range of meanings in the radio art. It can refer broadly, for example, to the entire range of UHF frequencies (the UHF band). It can also refer to administrative or regulatory subdivisions of larger bands, such as the 420-450 MHz UHF band or the yet smaller police band within the 420-450 MHz band. The present invention anticipates all these and similar meanings. The aggregations can comprise user channels from the same band; similarly, the aggregations can comprise user channels from a plurality of bands. Similarly, bandwidth harvested from different primary users can be from one or more bands.

Referring now to FIG. 3A, a diagram illustrates a band plan, generally indicated by 20, in which 6.25, 12.5, 25 and 50-kHz user channels are overlaid, as might be prescribed by a radio spectrum regulatory agency such as the FCC (Federal Communications Commission). In the diagram, band 20 is comprised of a series of 6.25 kHz user channels 21. Overlaying band 20 is a series of 12.5 kHz user channels 23 in overlay 22. Note that in this example, the edges of 12.5 kHz user channels 23 align with an edge of two 6.25 kHz user channels 21 and the center of 12.5 kHz user channel 23 aligns with an edge of a 6.25 kHz user channel 21. Similarly, 25 kHz user channels 25 of overlay 24 align with an edge of two 12.5 kHz user channels 23. The center of 25 kHz user channel 25 is on an edge of a 12.5 kHz user channel 23. Similarly, 50 kHz user channels 27 of overlay 26 align with an edge of two 25 kHz user channels 25. The center of 50 kHz user channel 27 is on an edge of a 25 kHz user channel 25. Note that overlay 20 has a one-half user channel (3.125 kHz) guard band 29. Overlay 22 similarly has a guard band comprised of one-half of a 12.5 kHz user channel plus guard band 29 (6.25+3.125 kHz). Overlay 23 similarly has a guard band comprised of one-half of a 12.5 kHz user channel plus guard band 29 (6.25+3.125 kHz). Overlay 25 similarly has a guard band comprised of one-half of a 25 kHz user channel plus guard band 29 (12.5+3.125 kHz). Overlay 27 similarly has a guard band comprised of one-half of a 50 kHz user channel plus guard band 29 (25+3.125 kHz).

Referring now to FIG. 3B, which is similar to FIG. 3A, except that overlay user channels 63, 65 and 67 of FIG. 3B are shifted left 3.125 kHz compared to FIG. 3A. This shift to the left (lower frequency) has the effect, for example, that the left edge of 12.5 kHz user channel 63 is on the center of 6.25 kHz user channel 61, rather than on an edge of 6.25 kHz user channel 61 compared to FIG. 3A.

These band plans are representative of band plans that a radio spectrum regulatory agency such as the FCC might construct for VHF, UHF and other radio bands.

Note that one practical difference between the representative band plans of FIG. 3A and FIG. 3B is that, for example, in FIG. 3A, 25 kHz user channel 25 has two center overlay 6.25 kHz user channels 29 and two outer overlay 6.25 kHz user channels 29; whereas in FIG. 3B, 25 kHz user channel 65 has one center 6.25 kHz user channel 29, two interior 6.25 kHz user channels 29 and two half-6.25 kHz (3.125 kHz) outer user channels.

It will be shown below that this has some impact on selecting a hopping sequence to minimize interference to conventional or trunked radios in an aggregation or bandwidth used for harvesting since use of 6.25 kHz overlay user channels 21 and 61 in the center of a 25 kHz user channel 25 or 65, for example, has a greater interference effect than an outer overlay user channel 21 or 61, as will be understood by one skilled in the radio art.

FIG. 4 is a timing diagram showing how a clear channel list is generated.

Clear channel assessment is performed at both the master site and at each of the remote sites. Each remote site transmits information about clear channels that it senses in its area and transmits that information to the master site. The master site aggregates the information from each of the remote sites into a master clear channel list which identifies clear channels available at all sites throughout the network. The master list of clear channels is maintained at the master site and is transmitted to all remote sites in the network. By transmitting only on a clear channel, a respective site is insured that it will not interfere with any primary user of the spectrum of interest.

FIG. 4 is a sequence diagram of one methodology through which the master site maintains and distributes this aggregate list of clear channels to all the remote sites in the network. When not transmitting a message to the master, each remote user is sequentially stepping through and monitoring its current list of clear channels (that it has previously obtained from the master unit), in accordance with a pseudo random hopping sequence known a priori by all the users of the network from a message that may be transmitted to it by the master site transceiver.

During the preamble period of any message being transmitted by the master at step 331, each remote transceiver scans all 480-6.25 KHz frequency bins within the 217-220 MHz spectrum for the presence of energy at step 332. Any bin containing energy above a prescribed threshold is masked as a non-clear channel, while the remaining ones of the 480 possible channels are marked as clear channels. Similarly, the master checks for clear channels when a remote station is transmitting a preamble.

In one embodiment, with each remote site transceiver having generated a clear channel list as a result of preamble scanning step 332, the master transceiver then sequentially interrogates each remote in the network for its clear channel list via a clear channel request message in step 333. In response to receiving a clear channel request message, a respective remote site transceiver transmits back to the master channel at step 334 the clear channel list it obtained during the preamble portion of the master's message. The master site transceiver continues to sequentially interrogate each of the remote site transceivers, via subsequent clear channel list requests, until it has completed interrogation of the last remote site.

In another embodiment, a remote station reports new interference any time the remote is given a chance to transmit. Preferably this will occur when the remote has a chance to transmit using a single carrier transmission (which occurs from time to time) since the hopping sequence is suspect.

In step 335, the master site transceiver logically combines all of the clear channel lists from all the interrogated remote transceivers to produce an ‘aggregate’ clear channel list. This aggregate clear channel list is stored in the master transceiver and broadcast in step 336 to all of the remote transceivers. The aggregate clear channel list is broadcast to the remotes using a single carrier transmission since the hopping sequence is suspect. An initialization (beacon) message is transmitted on a single carrier. As the aggregate clear channel list is received at a respective remote site transceiver it is stored in memory.

Any type of message may be sent using a single carrier transmission.

FIG. 5 shows how beacon preamble messages are organized.

As noted above, in accordance with the present invention, all actions, including the assembly of the communication network itself, are initiated by the master site transceiver. When the master site transceiver first comes up, it is the only member of the network. An initial task of the master is to determine whether there are any remote sites who wish to join the network, and then grant permission and enable such remote sites to become active network participants, thereby assembling the network for its intended use (e.g., telemetry from a plurality of transducer sites). Once one or more remote site transceivers have joined the network, the master may transmit messages to those remote sites, and may grant permission to the remote sites to transmit messages back to the master site. To this end, the master site employs the four message formats shown in FIGS. 5-8.

More particularly, FIG. 5 shows the contents of a ‘beacon preamble’ burst, that is periodically transmitted by the master for the purpose of stimulating a response from any remote site who wishes to join the network. To this end, the beacon preamble comprises a single carrier burst, a first portion 281 of which is pure carrier on a frequency, which the master has determined after a scan of the spectrum of interest to be a clear channel. This clear channel carrier portion 281 is followed by a field 282 containing an alternating series of 1's and 0's, and terminated by a field 283, that contains a unique word specifically associated with a search for joining the network action. As will be described, in the course of scanning the (480) channels in (3 MHz) band of interest for the presence of activity, and detecting a beacon preamble, a remote site will proceed to transmit back to the master site a response burst containing only the carrier it has detected in the beacon preamble. The use of the carrier (which the master has previously determined to be a clear channel) in the beacon preamble ensures that the response by the remote site will not interfere with another user of the network.

FIG. 6 shows the contents of an initialization burst, which is transmitted by the master site to a remote site who is desirous of joining the network and has successfully responded to the master ‘beacon preamble’ shown in FIG. 5, described above. Because the remote site has no knowledge of any clear channel other than the channel on which the master's beacon preamble was transmitted, it continues to listen on that channel for a follow-up initialization message from the master site. The follow-up or initialization message of FIG. 6 is a single carrier message (the same clear channel which was detected by the remote site as the beacon of FIG. 5) containing a preamble 291 of pure carrier, which is followed by a field 292 of alternating 1's and 0's, and a unique word field 293, which is different from the unique word field 283. This is followed by a message field 294, which contains prescribed information that enables the remote site to join the network, including the clear channel map, the PN sequence used to hop through the clear channel map, the seed for the PN sequence and the preamble channel number. As the remote transceiver is not locked to the master site transceiver, this last item ensures that the remote will properly identify the number of the channel on which it has responded to the master, and thereby enable the remote site to properly use the clear channel map for messaging.

FIG. 7 shows the configuration of a standard data message burst used for the transmission of information between a master site and a remote site (other than initialization of the remote site, as described above with reference to FIGS. 5 and 6). In particular, a data message burst contains a single channel preamble, an initial portion 301 of which is pure carrier, followed by an alternating series of 1's and 0's (302), and being terminated by a unique word field 303, that is different from the unique word fields of the message formats of FIGS. 5 and 6. The preamble, which may typically be on the order of several tens (e.g., 48) of symbols, is followed by a multicarrier data field 304 of N symbols in length.

FIG. 8 shows at a high level how multi carrier ticklers are formed. Respectively different sets of clear channels are used as tickler tones sets by the master site transceiver to initiate a prescribed response in a remote site transceiver, and by the remote site transceiver to initiate a response in the master site transceiver. In particular, as will be described, the master site transceiver may transmit a ‘media open’ tickler tone set to indicate that the network is available for the transmission of messages from a remote site transceiver to the master site; an ‘access grant’ tickler tone set granting access to the network to the first in time, access-requesting remote site transceiver; and a ‘master access’ tickler tone set to indicated to the network that the master site transceiver is about to broadcast a message. In a less preferred embodiment a remote site transceiver may transmit an ‘access request’ tone set. This tone set is transmitted by a remote site having data to transmit to the master site transceiver, after the expiration of a random delay period following detection of the media open tickler tone set from the master site transceiver. Tickler tones may be comprised of sets of multiple frequencies (e.g., from three to five frequencies) extracted from the clear channel list and are transmitted simultaneously over a prescribed symbol span, e.g., on the order of four to five symbols.

FIG. 9 shows an exemplary implementation from the parent application of one form of how channel access is generated.

The communication routine for the case in which the remote site has data to transmit and is awaiting permission from the master site to transmit that data (to the master site transceiver), is now described. In order to indicate that the network media is ‘open’ for message requests, the master site transceiver transmits a ‘media open’ tickler 371.

As shown in the contention and backoff diagram of FIG. 9, each remote site transceiver with a pending message awaiting transmission will respond through a random slotted back off, before transmitting an access request. Thereafter, the requesting remote transceiver waits for the master site to transmit an ‘access grant’ tickler. Once a remote node has been granted access to the channel, the master node listens for a transmission from the remote node for a period of time known as an acquisition of signal (AOS) timeout period.

In the contention and backoff diagram of FIG. 9, it can be seen that remote transceiver RTU2 will not attempt to send a data message, since it will not detect an access grant, as the access grant 373 from the master is transmitted at the same time that remote transceiver RTU2 is transmitting an access request. Remote transceiver RTU3 never attempts to send an access request, because it sees an access grant being transmitted by the master prior to RTU 3 initiating an access request, so that RTU3 knows that the access grant from the master site is intended for another remote transceiver.

Where the master site transceiver transmits a data message to a remote site, it transmits a prescribed master access tickler. In response to this tickler, the remote site transceiver transitions to a receive state and receives the message. This is followed by the master site transceiver transmitting a message.

FIG. 10 illustrates a high level transmission protocol preferred for use in carrying out communications between a master and remote units in accordance with one aspect of the invention. At a high level, the protocol for communications includes three components. There is a first portion of a frame in which the master transceiver transmits; that section is designated 1000 in FIG. 10. It is followed by a section of time during which one or more remote stations will transmit (1010) to the master. In between the intervals 1000 and 1010, there is a period 1020 during which chime-in request for access from the remote terminals can be sent to the master.

FIG. 11 illustrates the components of the master station transmit portion of the FIG. 10 protocol. The master transmit interval 1000 is comprised of a start of frame component 1100, a reservation map 1120, and a master transmit component 1110. The start of frame component comprises a carrier portion 1101 and a symbol timing recovery portion 1102.

The master station transmit portion 1110 is comprised of one or more addressed messages 1111 and optionally 1112. A master station that may need to transmit to more than one station has the capability to expand the master station transmit interval to accommodate the number of addressed messages that are scheduled for transmission.

The reservation map 1120 contains the clear channel access map that is generated from the individual clear channel access maps transmitted by each remote to the central master station.

FIG. 12 illustrates the remote station transmit portion of the FIG. 10 protocol. The period 1010 shown in FIG. 10 during which remote stations transmit can contain, in the preferred embodiment, messages transmitted by the first remote to be granted access followed by, in an optional embodiment, transmissions from other nodes which have been granted access 1220.

FIG. 13 illustrates how chime-in requests for channel access are generated and how chime-in frequencies are assigned to remote stations in accordance with one aspect of the invention. The reservation map 1120, described in conjunction with FIG. 11 either explicitly or implicitly defines the end of frame constituting the period of time during which the master station transmits. Following the end of frame, the chime-in period 1020 begins.

The present invention has very low overhead. Its efficiency comes because it enables all remote stations to signal their need for upstream bandwidth simultaneously during a chime-in period. After a fixed frame period and any time that the master station completes transmitting all remote sites may signal for a brief period simultaneously, each in a designated frequency. The transmission need not contain any information. It can be a simple unmodulated carrier, indicating that the site needs make a transmission. Sites that need not transmit at the moment do not signal. During this brief period, the master station scans all of the carriers simultaneously, noting which sites transmitted. The carriers are the same frequencies used for frequency-hopping data transmissions. The chime-in period can be initiated implicitly by the expiration of time from a master station transmission or explicitly by receipt of a command signal from the master station.

The efficiency of this scheme can be attributed to three factors: the chime-in signaling period can be quite short, on the order of a few milliseconds, for all remote radios in the network to signal; all remote radios signal simultaneously over that short period; and the master station can initiate a signaling period as frequently or infrequently as needed.

In the preferred embodiment, the remote stations use the following mechanism to select their designated signaling carrier frequency: a site's assigned Site ID (assigned by the Network Management System) is used as an index into the current hopping sequence being used. For example, the remote site with Site ID ‘3’ would signal in the third carrier in the present hopping sequence. To further amplify the example, if the hopping sequence happened to be hopping channels 7, 8, 11, 15, 22, 28, . . . and so on, then remote site 3 would use hopping channel 11 (assuming the site IDs started with ‘1’ rather than ‘0’).

As described earlier, in the present invention, the network uses a dynamic hopping sequence based on interference measurements. A pseudo-random sequence is used to select hopping channels in the band that are not busy. If, for example, the network is using 20 hopping channels simultaneously to achieve the desired bandwidth, it will select twenty of the available hopping channels out of the available (non-busy) hopping channels and transmit in those hopping channels for a dwell period. It will then select another set of twenty available hopping channels out of the available hopping channels and use those during the next dwell period. This process continues until the continuing spectral analysis, described earlier, detects a change to the list of available hopping channels (new interference or formerly busy or blocked hopping channel becomes available). After that time, new hopping sequences are used in the network, to take into account the change in interference analysis.

The selection of a signaling channel for a particular site, described earlier is based on the current hopping sequence. If there are more sites than hopping channels in the present sequence (due to the number of simultaneous hopping channels needed or restrictions due to interference), the signaling will, in the preferred embodiment, occur in cycles. For example, if 20 hopping channels are used in the hopping sequence and there are 32 remote sites, sites 1-20 will signal in the first signaling period; in the second signaling period, sites 21-32 will signal. In the preferred embodiment, the master station will signal for cycle 1 of the signaling period, and after that period has ended will signal immediately for cycle 2. By this method, large numbers of sites can signal, adding only a few milliseconds to the signaling period per twenty sites (in the present example).

In the preferred embodiment, the master station uses the following basic process for managing the multiple access method:

a “frame” is dynamic in size (asynchronous); a new frame begins any time that the master station designates one through a signal.

Typically, the master or master station:

• • transmits one or more messages downstream
  • sends a start-of-frame signal
  • the first cycle of remote stations signal for upstream access
  • as needed, the master station signals for additional cycles of upstream access signaling
  • the master or master station then selects the next station to transmit from those stations that signaled for upstream access, using a round-robin algorithm for fair access.
  • in the first transmission from a thus-selected remote site, that site includes a metric of its dynamic need along with the data transmission (which could be user data or management data). In the present embodiment, the master station may, after the first transmission of the presently transmitting site, enable further transmissions according to the metric received or signal for the next site in it list of sites needing upstream bandwidth. The decision to enable another site to transmit before a previous site has exhausted its backlog of data can be based on a variety of network performance criteria well known to one skilled in the art, such as meeting a maximum jitter or delay criteria or meeting an application-determined priority. If a site will have no more data to send after its current transmission, its metric of need will indicate this condition so that the master station may select a new site to transmit.

In the present embodiment, the master station may end the downstream transmission at any time for updates to the hopping sequence and/or to transmit downstream data. Afterwards, the master station may begin a new frame (additional signaling) or continue enabling remote stations to transmit based on the previously collected signaling information. This choice will be based on the network performance criteria described above (jitter, delay, priority, etc.). As noted, many criteria will be apparent to one skilled in the art for determining the order in which upstream access is enabled and these are anticipated by the present invention, including simple round-robin schemes and application bandwidth requirements such as packet voice or video.

Thus, using the chime-in type request for channel access, substantial improvements in transmission efficiency and in the time required to gain channel access can be achieved.

While we have shown and described an embodiment in accordance with the present invention, it is to be understood that the same is not limited thereto but is susceptible to numerous changes and modifications as known to a person skilled in the art. We therefore do not wish to be limited to the details shown and described herein, but intend to cover all such changes and modifications as are obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art.

Claims

1. A method for allocating access to transmission bandwidth, comprising: causing each station of a network, having a status of needing to send information, to indicate that status on a different respective frequency of a group of frequencies used by stations of said network.

2. The method of claim 1 in which each station indicates that status by transmitting an unmodulated carrier.

3. The method of claim 1 in which each station indicates that status substantially simultaneously with other stations.

4. The method of claim 3 in which each stations indicates that status by responding to a signal from a master station.

5. The method of claim 3 in which stations are arranged in groups and stations of a group respond substantially simultaneously.

6. The method of claim 5 in which stations of the network are arranged in plural groups and stations of one group respond substantially simultaneously in one time interval and stations of different groups respond in respectively different time intervals.

7. The method of claim 1 in which the group of frequencies is selected from frequencies used for frequency hopping transmissions by stations of said network.

8. The method of claim 7 in which frequencies used for frequency hopping are those identified as clear by all stations of said network.

9. The method of claim 1 in which the different respective frequency is selected from a group of frequencies using a unique station identification to access a list of frequencies.

10. The method of claim 9 in which the group of frequencies are selected from a group of clear channels.

11. The method of claim 10 in which the group of clear channels are used for frequency hopping.

12. Apparatus for allocating access to transmission bandwidth comprising: a. a transmitter for sending a unique signal to all stations of a network; and b. a receiver for receiving substantially simultaneously from each station of said network having information to send on said transmission channel a response signal.

13. Apparatus of claim 12 in which one or more stations with information to send are sent an authorization to transmit.

14. Apparatus of claim 13 in which said one or more stations to which an authorization to transmit was sent transmit information to said apparatus after receiving said authorization.

15. Apparatus of claim 14 in which the one or more stations receiving an authorization to transmit, transmit in respectively different time intervals.

16. Apparatus for obtaining access to a transmission channel comprising: a. a receiver for receiving a unique signal from a master station; b. a table storing a list of frequencies; c. a selection mechanism for selecting a frequency from a list of frequencies using a unique network identification; and d. a transmitter for transmitting a response signal to said master station on the frequency selected by said selection mechanism, if said apparatus has information to send.

17. A system for allocating access to transmission bandwidth, comprising: a. a master stations for sending a unique signal; b. a plurality of remote stations, each of which responds to said unique signal substantially simultaneously on a respective frequency only if that remote stations has information to transmit.

18. A computer program product comprising: a. a computer readable medium; and b. instructions stored on said computer readable medium for causing a station of a network, having a status of needing to send information, to indicate that status on a different respective frequency of a group of frequencies used by stations of said network substantially simultaneously with indications of status from other stations.