Patent Grant
8735543
This invention pertains in general to the field of polypeptides capable of eliciting an immunological response that is protective against Chlamydia trachomatis. More particularly the invention relates the production of these polypeptides and to pharmaceutical compositions comprising them.
It is known that one of the proteins forming the outer membrane complex of Chlamydia trachomatis, the major outer membrane protein (MOMP), is able to induce both T-cell responses and neutralizing antibodies against chlamydial infection in mammals, such as humans. A schematic overview of the MOMP protein is shown in
Use of the total MOMP protein as a vaccine against Chlamydia trachomatis has been disclosed in WO 2008/040757 A1.
However, animal experiments have shown very limited success of anti-chlamydial MOMP subunit vaccines. Furthermore, the production of the whole MOMP protein is tedious and expensive, not to mention limited to certain specific production methods.
To overcome the abovementioned deficiency, it has been suggested to use synthetic peptides, which combine specific epitopes from Chlamydia trachomatis, which epitopes trigger an immune response.
However, such isolated epitopes may not be functional in a synthetic context and thus not provide the desired effect.
Hence, an improved polypeptide for producing an immune response which is protective against Chlamydia trachomatis would be advantageous and in particular a polypeptide allowing for increased flexibility, cost-effectiveness, simplicity of production and purification with retained or improved immunological effect would be advantageous.
Accordingly, the present invention preferably seeks to mitigate, alleviate or eliminate one or more of the above-identified deficiencies in the art and disadvantages singly or in any combination and solves at least the above mentioned problems by providing a polypeptide according to the appended patent claims.
The general solution according to the invention is to provide a polypeptide which is easy to produce and purify, but has retained capacity for producing an immune response against Chlamydia trachomatis.
Thus, according to a first aspect, a polypeptide is provided. Said polypeptide comprises a first amino acid sequence which has at least 90%, such as at least 95%, homology (% identity) with the amino acid sequence according to SEQ ID NO: 1, as measured with the BLAST algorithm with standard settings and a second amino acid sequence which has at least 90%, such as at least 95%, homology with the amino acid sequence according to SEQ ID NO: 2, as measured with the BLAST algorithm with standard settings, wherein said first and second amino acid sequences are separated by less than 30 amino acid residues. Said first and second amino acid sequences each comprises epitopes for producing an antigen-specific immune response which is protective against Chlamydia trachomatis, and a part of the membrane spanning part of the major outer membrane protein (MOMP) of Chlamydia trachomati. Together, the first and second amino acid sequences comprise about 25 epitopes, which may both stimulate T cell response (CD4+ and CD8+) as well as B cell response. An advantage with this is that the polypeptide is easier to produce in purified form compared to the whole MOMP protein, while still eliciting an acceptable immunological response. An advantage with the polypeptides, each comprising a part of the membrane spanning part of MOMP is that the three dimensional structure of the epitopes is conserved, since the two membrane spanning parts may interact to form a hydrophobic structure, as illustrated in
Taken together, the polypeptide provides an alternative synthetic peptide based on the MOMP protein that is antigenic and suitable for use as a vaccine.
Specifically, the polypeptide may enable retained or improved antigenicity compared to artificial, shorter sequences with only two linked epitopes, while being easy to produce and purify compared to wild-type MOMP.
In an embodiment, the polypeptide is between 107 and 132 amino acids long, such as between 107 and 112 amino acids long. An advantage with this is that the polypeptide is easier to express.
In an embodiment, the first amino acid sequence and the second amino acid sequence are separated by a linker according to SEQ ID NO: 20 or SEQ ID NO: 26.
This is advantageous, since the linker according to SEQ ID NO: 20 or SEQ ID NO: 26 is flexible, which means that it provides a possibility for interaction at random between the two parts of the chimera, increasing the probability for formation of three-dimensional structure that would be recognized by the immune system, without locking the protein in an unfavorable conformation.
Another advantage with a flexible linker is that it provides the opportunity for the two parts of the polypeptide to interact with different parts of the immune system at the same time, since they may move in relation to each other, as illustrated in
In an embodiment, the epitopes for producing an antigen-specific immune response which is protective against Chlamydia trachomatis are conserved in several serovars of Chlamydia trachomatis.
This is advantageous, since it enables a protective response against more than one serovar of Chlamydia trachomatis.
In an embodiment, the first and second amino acid sequence is a sequence according to SEQ ID NO: 21 and SEQ ID NO: 22, respectively (Chlamydia trachomatis, serovar E). In another embodiment, the first and second amino acid sequence is a sequence according to SEQ ID NO: 23 and SEQ ID NO: 24, respectively (Chlamydia trachomatis, serovar D). The first and second amino acid sequences may also be combined from different serovars.
This is advantageous, since it enables a protective response against more than one serovar of Chlamydia trachomatis.
In an embodiment, the polypeptide has at least 90%, such as at least 95%, homology with the amino acid sequence according to SEQ ID NO: 3, as measured with the BLAST algorithm with standard settings. In an embodiment, the polypeptide comprises an amino acid sequence according to SEQ ID NO: 3 and in another embodiment, the polypeptide has an amino acid sequence according to SEQ ID NO: 3.
In an embodiment the polypeptide is fused to an amino acid sequence comprising a His tag according to SEQ ID NO: 5 and/or a V5 tag according to SEQ ID NO: 4.
An advantage with this is that the polypeptide is easier to purify.
In an embodiment the polypeptide has, i.e. consists of, an amino acid sequence according to SEQ ID NO: 6.
According to a second aspect, a compound comprising the amino acid sequence according to the first aspect is provided.
According to a third aspect, a nucleic acid is provided which encodes a polypeptide according to the first aspect.
In an embodiment, the nucleic acid has a first nucleic acid sequence which has at least 60%, or at least 70%, such as at least 80%, or preferably at least 90% homology, as measured with a BLAST algorithm with standard settings, with the nucleic acid sequence according to SEQ ID NO: 7 and a second nucleic acid sequence which has at least 60%, or at least 70%, such as at least 80%, or preferably at least 90% homology, as measured with a BLAST algorithm with standard settings, with the nucleic acid sequence according to SEQ ID NO: 8, wherein said first and second nucleic acid sequences are separated by less than 90 nucleic acid residues.
In an embodiment, the nucleic acid comprises a nucleic acid sequence according to SEQ ID NO: 9.
According to a fourth aspect, a plasmid is provided which comprises the nucleic acid according to the third aspect.
In an embodiment, the plasmid is used as an expression vector.
According to a fifth aspect, a cell transformed with an expression vector according to the fourth aspect is provided.
In an embodiment, the cell is chosen from the group consisting of a plant cell, a bacterium, a yeast cell, a fungi cell, an insect cell or a mammalian cell.
According to a sixth aspect, a process is provided for producing a polypeptide according to the first aspect, which process comprises culturing a cell according to the fifth aspect and recovering the polypeptide.
According to a seventh aspect, a composition is provided comprising a polypeptide according to the first aspect together with a pharmaceutically acceptable excipient.
In an embodiment, the composition further comprises an adjuvant, such as cholera toxin (CT) adjuvant.
According to an eight aspect, a polypeptide according to the first aspect, a compound according the second aspect, or a composition according to the seventh aspect for use as a medicament is provided.
According to a ninth aspect, a polypeptide according to the first aspect, a compound according the second aspect, or a composition according to the seventh aspect for use as a vaccine against Chlamydia trachomatis is provided.
According to a tenth aspect, a polypeptide according to the first aspect, a compound according the second aspect, or a composition according to the seventh aspect for use to prohibit infertility as a result of infection with Chlamydia trachomatis is provided.
According to an eleventh aspect, use is provided, wherein said polypeptide according to the first aspect, said compound according to the second aspect, or said composition according to the seventh aspect is administered orally, parenterally, by inhalation spray, topically, rectally, nasally, buccally, sublingually or vaginally.
In an embodiment, said administration is nasal administration. The nasal administration may be by nasal spray or nasal drops.
The present invention has the advantage over the prior art that it is easier to produce, with retained or improved immunological effect, which in turn allows for more flexible administrative routes.
The present invention also has the advantage that it is easier to purify in a soluble faun and has increased stability in solution.
These and other aspects, features and advantages of which the invention is capable of will be apparent and elucidated from the following description of embodiments of the present invention, reference being made to the accompanying drawings, in which
Several embodiments of the present invention will be described in more detail below with reference to the accompanying drawings in order for those skilled in the art to be able to carry out the invention. The invention may, however, be embodied in many different forms and should not be construed as limited to the embodiments set forth herein. Rather, these embodiments are provided so that this disclosure will be thorough and complete, and will fully convey the scope of the invention to those skilled in the art. The embodiments do not limit the invention, but the invention is only limited by the appended patent claims. Furthermore, the terminology used in the detailed description of the particular embodiments illustrated in the accompanying drawings is not intended to be limiting of the invention.
The following description focuses on an embodiment of the present invention applicable to a polypeptide for producing an immune response which is protective against Chlamydia trachomatis, and in particular to a chimeric polypeptide, based on the Chlamydia trachomatis serovar E polypeptide MOMP, for producing an immune response which is protective against Chlamydia trachomatis. However, it will be appreciated that the invention is not limited to this application but may be applied to many other serovars, including for example serovars A to K, Ba, Da, Ia, Ja, L1 to L3, and L2a.
The present inventors have found a chimeric polypeptide, based on the MOMP protein, which functions as an antigen for immunization against Chlamydia trachomatis, and yet is easy to purify, due to its relatively small size and reduced hydrophobicity in comparison to WT MOMP protein.
As will be shown in greater detail below, the polypeptide may be expressed in a variety of hosts, such as Escherichia coli, Ambidopsis thaliana and Daucus carota. However, any kind of host such as bacteria yeast, fungi, plant, insect or mammalian cells may be used for expression. The polypeptide or MOMP chimera, which comprises two loops of the WT MOMP protein, is more water soluble than the WT protein and is optimized regarding antigenicity since it includes T and B lymphocyte—stimulating epitopes, which is important for the immunological effect. Furthermore, it is easier to purify and more stable.
The polypeptide may be administered to a subject by any means known to one of ordinary skill in the art. For example, administration to the human or animal may be local or systemic and accomplished orally, parenterally, by inhalation spray, topically, rectally, nasally, buccally, sublingually vaginally, or via an implanted reservoir. The term “parenteral” as used herein includes subcutaneous, intravenous, intraarterial, intramuscular, intradermal, intraperitoneal, intrathecal, intraventricular, intrasternal, intracranial, and intraosseous injection and infusion techniques.
In an embodiment, a pharmaceutical composition is also provided, said composition comprising an effective amount of at least one polypeptide according to some embodiments and a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier. The composition may be formulated into solid, liquid, gel or suspension form for: oral administration as, for example, tablet (for example, targeted for buccal, sublingual or systemic absorption), bolus, powder, granule, paste or gel for application to the tongue, hard gelatin capsule, soft gelatin capsule, mouth spray, emulsion and microemulsion; parenteral administration by subcutaneous, intramuscular, intravenous or epidural injection as, for example, a sterile solution or suspension; topical application as, for example, a cream, ointment, patch or spray applied to the skin; intravaginal or intrarectal administration as, for example, a pessary, cream or foam; sublingual administration; ocular administration; transdermal administration; or nasal administration, such as nasal spray, or nasal drops.
In an embodiment, the polypeptide may be administered orally to a subject, such as a mouse or a human. In another embodiment, the polypeptide may be administered nasally to a subject, such as a mouse or a human. The nasal administration may be by a spray or by drops. In yet another embodiment, the polypeptide may be administered parenterally to a subject, such as a mouse or a human.
The present inventors found a construct with epitopes according to an embodiment, important for CD4+ T lymphocytes, cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL) as well as neutralizing antibodies, which are necessary for the creation of a protective immune response against Chlamydia trachomatis. This new protein induced immunogenic response as well as a protective effect in mice.
The type and quantity of amino acid residues separating the epitopes, such as separating SEQ ID NO: 1 and SEQ ID NO: 2, may be selected such, as known in the art, that the polypeptide is easily purified, the corresponding nucleic acid sequence is conveniently expressed in the desired cell type and/or the polypeptide may be administered in a desirable formulation. Preferably, this selection is done such that capacity of the polypeptide for producing an immune response against Chlamydia trachomatis is kept high, or at least at an acceptable level.
The designed construct was successfully transferred into the Arabidopsis thaliana genome, and stable integration of the transgene was demonstrated over at least six generations which was proved by immunoblot analysis. This is advantageous, since stability of the transgene in the offspring is important for the future possibilities to scale up transgenic plant production. Since A. thaliana is eaten raw by mice, it may function as a model system in pre-clinical trials.
Further advantages of using edible transgenic plants for vaccinations include the simple delivery, cost efficiency and possibilities for local production. Moreover, vaccines produced in this way are safe and non-infectious and open up for a possibility to provide a high frequency of boosts. Improvement of administration protocols and use of adjuvants during oral vaccination may increase efficiency of edible vaccines.
Plant-based edible vaccines are good candidates for such immunization. They are safe, cheap, and could be grown locally. In addition, transgenic plants are capable of producing several different antigens by crossing plants producing different products. It is known that transgenic plants can stimulate a two-way immune response, both systemic and mucosal.
Furthermore, the designed construct was successfully transferred into Escherichia coli. This is advantageous, since E. coli is well known and a commonly used host for protein production.
In an embodiment, the polypeptide is linked to an expression tag, such as a V5 and/or a His tag. This is advantageous, because it simplifies production and purification of the polypeptide.
The following is a detailed description of embodiments. It is provided for illustrative purposes only, in order for a person skilled in the art to be able to make and use the invention. However, it shall not be construed as limiting in any way.
Chimeric MOMP Construction
Total genomic DNA was isolated from bacterial suspension (Örebro University Hospital, Sweden), emanating from an Chlamydia trachomatis serovar E infected patient, using QIAamp® DNA Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer's protocol. The initial amplification of two DNA fragments (as illustrated by the similar parts VS2 and VS4 in
The purified fragments, SEQ ID NOs: 1 and 2, comprises epitopes for producing an antigen-specific immune response which is protective against Chlamydia trachomatis, and parts of the membrane spanning part of the major outer membrane protein (MOMP) of Chlamydia trachomati. The membrane spanning part of SEQ ID NO: 1 is represented by amino acid number 22 to 27 and the membrane spanning parts of SEQ ID NO: 2 are represented by amino acid number 3 to 9 and 17 to 23, respectively. An advantage with using only fragments of MOMP is that the polypeptide is easier to produce in purified form compared to the whole MOMP protein. An advantage with the polypeptide comprising parts of the membrane spanning part of MOMP is that the three dimensional structure of the epitopes is conserved. Another advantage with the polypeptide comprising parts of the membrane spanning part of MOMP is that the epitopes are retained in the construct during production. A further advantage with this is that it provides the possibility for hydrophobic interaction between the two parts of the chimera, in turn providing a three dimensional domain that could mimic antigenic features of the whole MOMP protein.
It is believed that the membrane spanning part is a helical conformation.
In an embodiment each of the fragments, such as SEQ ID NOs: 1 and 2, comprises two helices.
This is advantageous, since it further enhances the advantages mentioned above.
Taken together, the polypeptide enables retained or improved antigenicity, while being easy to produce and purify.
In an embodiment, the epitopes for producing an antigen-specific immune response which is protective against Chlamydia trachomatis are conserved in several serovars of Chlamydia trachomatis.
This is advantageous, since it enables a protective response against more than one serovar of Chlamydia trachomatis.
Cloning and Expression of MOMP Chimera in E. coli
The purified MOMP chimera was cloned into pET101/D-TOPO® vector using Champion pET Directional TOPO® Expression Kit (Invitrogen, Groningen, The Netherlands) according to the manufacturer's protocol. The confirmation that our construct was in frame with the C-terminal V5 and 6× His fusion tags was done by sequencing (ABI PRISM 310 GeneticAnalyser, Applied Biosystems, Foster City, Calif.). The chimeric protein was expressed in BL21 Star™ (DE3) E. coli strain. A volume of 1000 ml of LB medium containing 50 μg/ml carbenicillin and 2.5 mM betaine (Sigma, Steinheim, Germany) was inoculated with 10 ml of a fresh overnight culture derived from a single colony of E. coli and grown at 37° C. to an optical density (OD) of 0.72 at 600 nm. Isopropyl β-D-thiogalactoside (IPTG, Invitrogen, Groningen, The Netherlands) was added to final concentration of 0.15 mM, and the culture was incubated for further 4 hours. Bacteria were harvested by centrifugation (5000×g, 15 min) and subjected to protein purification according to Sigma-Aldrich's protocol for their Ni-NTA resin.
Purification of MOMP Chimera
The bacterial pellet was resuspended in lysis buffer (50 mM potassium phosphate, pH 7.8, 400 mM NaCl, 100 mM KCl, 10% glycerol, 0.5% Triton X-100, 10 mM L-histidine, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF)), frozen in liquid nitrogen and then thawed at 42° C. Freezing and thawing were repeated 3 times followed by sonication on ice (35 W, 6×30 seconds) to facilitate lysis. After ultracentrifugation (45000×g, 45 min) two fractions were obtained—a soluble fraction and an insoluble fraction. The soluble fraction was subjected to purification under native conditions using HIS-Select Nickel Affinity Gel (Sigma, Saint Louis, Mo.) according to the manufacturer's protocol. The pellet was resuspended in 0.1 M sodium phosphate pH 8.0, 8M urea and sonicated as described above. Insoluble material was removed by ultracentrifugation (50000×g, 60 min). The supernatant was subjected to purification by immobilized metal-ion affinity chromatography under denaturing conditions according to the manufacturer's recommendations. The collected fractions of eluted protein were pooled together (separately for the native protein and for the denatured protein) and concentrated by Amicon Ultra centrifugal filter device with molecular weight cut off 10 KDa (Millipore, Billerica, Mass.).
DNA Construction for Plant Transformation
The chimeric MOMP was re-amplified from the previously obtained construct using primers SEQ ID NO: 14 and 18 (with introduced STOP codon into the primer according to SEQ ID NO: 18) and Pfx Taq-polymerase (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, Calif.) to produce blunt-end PCR product. PCR was carried out using the following conditions: 35 cycles at 94° C. 15 s, 55° C. 30 s, 72° C. 2 min followed by a single extension step at 72° C. for 30 min The PCR product was purified as described before and used for subcloning into plant expression vector.
As a plant expression vector we used pGreen0229 (www.pgreen.ac.uk) kindly provided by Dr. P. Mullineaux and Dr. R. Hellens, John Innes Centre and the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (Norwich Research Park, UK). The expression cassette contained CaMV35S promoter and CaMV polyA terminator sequences, separated by a multi-cloning site. The vector was linearized by SmaI enzyme at the multi-cloning site and used for cloning of the chimeric MOMP construct. The resulting plasmid was verified by sequencing to confirm correct orientation of the insert (ABI PRISM 310 GeneticAnalyser, Applied Biosystems, Foster City, Calif.).
Plant Transformation in Arabidopsis thaliana
The pGreen0229/chimeric MOMP was used to transform Agrobacterium tumefaciens (EHA105), kindly provided by E. E. Hood (Department of Biology, Utah State University), by electroporation.
Positive clones were selected on LB media supplemented with kanamycin (50 μg/ml) and tetracyclin (5 μg/ml).
Arabidopsis thaliana ecotype Columbia-0 (Col-0) (The European Arabidopsis Stock Centre, Loughborough, UK) was used as background for plant transformation. After sowing on a fertilized soil:Perlite:Vermiculite mixture (1:1:1), seeds were maintained for 5 days at 4° C. (darkness) and then transferred to a growth chamber (22° C., 16 h light, 8 h darkness, 70% humidity). The fluorescence rate of white light was 100 μmol photons m−2 s−1 (PAR). Transgenic plants were produced by the simplified floral dip method of four-week-old Arabidopsis plants as known within the art and selected by germination on Murashige and Skog (MS) medium containing glufosinate-ammonium (BASTA) (10 μg/ml) (Riedel-de Haën, Seelze, Germany) and sephatoxime (400 μg/ml) (Sigma, Steinheim, Germany). Resistant plants were transferred to potting mix for analysis, self-pollination and seed production. The seeds obtained from individual plants producing 100% BASTA-resistant progeny were used for further experiments.
Plant Transformation in Daucus carota
In an alternative embodiment, the pGreen0229/chimeric MOMP was used to transform Agrobacterium tumefaciens (EHA105), kindly provided by E. E. Hood (Department of Biology, Utah State University), by electroporation.
Positive clones were selected on LB media supplemented with kanamycin (50 μg/ml) and tetracyclin (5 μg/ml).
Seeds of Daticus carota (carrot) (L.) ssp. sativus cv Napoli F1 (Weibulls tradgard AB, Hammenhög, Sweden) were sterilized in 25% [v/v] chlorine for 45 min and another 2 h in 2.5% [v/v] chlorine, 70% ethanol for 1 min, and, finally, washed three times in water during 1 h. Sterile D. carota seeds were germinated on MS medium without growth regulators and callus cells were initiated from excised hypocotyls by cultivation on MS medium with 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (1 mg/l). The callus cells were suspended in liquid medium of the same type and grown in darkness on a shaker (90 rpm) at 25° C. For production of somatic embryos, the cells were transferred to a growth regulator-free MS medium. For transformation, carrot cells were taken 10-14 days after addition of fresh growth medium. The carrot cells were packed by centrifugation (at 100 g for 1 min), 4-5 ml packed cells were diluted in liquid MS medium up to 20 ml and 600 μl of A. tumefaciens carrying the vector in LB medium (optical density 1.5 at 600 nm) was added. The cells and bacteria were co-cultivated for 3 days in darkness at 25° C. using a shaker (90 rpm). For selection of transgenic carrot cells, they were repeatedly washed three times by centrifugation in liquid MS medium to remove bacteria and were subsequently imbedded and further cultivated in growth regulator-free medium supplemented with BASTA (0, 1, 5, or 10 μg/ml) and cephotaxime (500 μg/ml) in dim light (1 μE/m2/s) at 25° C. The density of carrot cells was 0.1-0.9 ml packed cells/10 ml of medium. Growing aggregates, and in some cases plants, were transferred to growth regulator-free MS medium without BASTA. The in vitro plants were cultivated and acclimated in 1 l plastic cans (PhytoTechnology Laboratories, Terrace Lenexa, Kans., USA) in a mist-house for approximately 2 weeks giving 18 h/6 h light/darkness in dim light and, subsequently, cultivated in pots using the equal light period but with a light intensity of 50 μE/m2/s.
Immunoblotting
To prepare protein samples, Arabidopsis tissues were ground with a mortar and pestle in an extraction buffer containing 50 mM Tris, 8 M urea, 1% Triton X-100 and 1 mM DTT (pH 7.5). Protein extracts were separated by SDS-PAGE and blotted onto nitrocellulose membrane Hybond-C (Amersham Biosciences, Buckinghamshire, England). The membrane was blocked in 3% BSA (Sigma, Steinheim, Germany) in TBS (0.02 M Tris-HCl, 0.15 M NaCl, pH 7.4) for 1 h and probed with mouse monoclonal antibodies to Chlamydia trachomatis MOMP (Acris Antibodies Gmbh, Germany) diluted 1:2500 for 1 h. Chimeric MOMP was detected with alkaline phosphatase (AP) conjugated anti-mouse antibody (Promega, Madison, Wis.) and visualized with NBT and BCIP (Promega, Madison, Wis.).
Genomic DNA Extraction and Southern Blot Analysis
Plant genomic DNA was isolated using JETFLEX Genomic DNA Purification Kit (GENOMED GmbH, Lane, Germany), and 15 μg DNA was cleaved with either DraI, NdeI or NotI (Sigma). These enzymes do not cleave the chimeric MOMP sequence. The cleaved DNA was separated by electrophoresis on a 1% agarose gel and transferred to Hybond-N membrane (GE Healthcare). The membrane was probed with chimeric MOMP DNA labelled with 32P-dCTP using the random primers DNA labelling system (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, Calif.). The number of bands observed on the X-ray film corresponded to the number of T-DNA insertions in the plant genome.
Verification of the Constructed Immunogen
A pilot experiment was performed. Five mice (C57/b16) were immunized by the recombinant MOMP chimera by intranasal administration (i.n.) with 10 days between each priming. The administrated dose was 10 μg of the purified recombinant MOMP chimera. The mice were bled before immunization start, and after each priming, and analysed for serum anti-MOMP chimera IgG by ELISA. ELISA plates (Nunc Maxisorp, Odense, Denmark) were coated with recombinant MOMP chimeric protein (2 μg/ml). Sera were diluted in PBS. Anti-chimera antibodies (Abs) were followed by HRP-labeled rabbit anti mouse Ig Abs and visualized using O-phenylene diamine substrate/0.04% H2O2 in citrate buffer (pH4.5). The reactions were read spectrophotometrically at 450 nm. The anti-MOMP chimera serum titres log10 titers, showed promising results (data not shown).
Chimeric MOMP Construct and its Over Expression in E. coli
The reverse and forward primers used in PCR to amplify the VS2 and VS4 variable regions of MOMP for assembling the chimera were designed from the nucleotide sequence data. The sequence according to SEQ ID NO: 19, encoding a common flexible linker, (Gly4Ser3)3, according to SEQ ID NO: 20, was introduced into the 5′-end of the primers according to SEQ ID NOs: 14 and 15, respectively. In an embodiment, the sequence according to SEQ ID NO: 25, encoding another common flexible linker, (Gly4Ser)2Gly4, according to SEQ ID NO: 26, was introduced into the 5′-end of the primers according to SEQ ID NOs: 14 and 15, respectively. The amplified VS2- and VS4-like fragments (SEQ ID NOs: 1 and 2, respectively) were then assembled in the following direction 5′-SEQ ID NOs: 1: linker: SEQ ID NOs: 2-3′. The produced chimera showed the expected size of 351 bp, as shown by the strong band in the L lane in
Analysis of Transgene Insertion and Chimera Production in Planta
The designed MOMP chimera was ligated into the SacI cloning site of the pGreen vector, and the sequence of the cloned fragment was verified. The recombinant expression vector was used to transform A. thaliana plants of the Col-0 ecotype. Forty transgenic plants were selected after initial seedling screening with bialaphos. Three selected transgenic lines number 9, 15 and 25 were used in further analysis, and stable integration of the transgene for up to sixth generation was demonstrated, as seen in
The Western blot detection of constitutively-expressed chimeric MOMP protein in unfractionated leaf extract is shown in
The chosen transgenic plants were subjected to Southern blot analysis in order to estimate the number of transgenes. Restriction enzymes Dra I, Nde I, and Mlu I were used for cleavage of plant genomic DNA. The results obtained with Dra I and Nde I are shown in
The results of the alternative embodiment, using Daucus carota, were analysed by grinding about 200 mg carrot root in liquid nitrogen with mortar and pestle. The frozen powder was thawed on ice and vortexed with 200 μl of 50 mM Tris-HCl buffer (pH 7.3) and then analysed as described above.
Immune Response Induced in Mice by Recombinant Chimeric MOMP Protein with His/V5 Tags
Four groups of ten mice were given constructed MOMP chimera according to SEQ ID NO: 6. Administration was conducted according to the following:
A first group was given a mixture of 10 μg purified MOMP chimera and 1 μg cholera toxin (CT) adjuvant, 20 μl intranasally (i.n.) three times with ten day intervals. Ten days after the last administration of MOMP chimera+CT adjuvant, the mice were given a subcutaneous (s.c.) injection with Depo-Provera (Pfizer). Seven days after the Depo-Provera injection, a follow-up administration (boost) of a mixture of 10 μg MOMP chimera+1 μg CT adjuvant, 40 μl was given intravaginally (i.vag).
A second group was given transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana, transformed according to above, orally three times with ten day intervals. Each time, mice were given an excess of fresh transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana in addition to the regular feed. Ten days after the last administration of transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana, the mice were given a subcutaneous (s.c.) injection with Depo-Provera (Pfizer). Seven days after the Depo-Provera (Pfizer) injection, a follow-up administration (boost) of a mixture of 10 μg MOMP chimera+1 μg CT adjuvant, 40 μl was given intravaginally (i.vag).
A third group was given transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana, transformed according to above, orally three times with ten day intervals. Each time, mice were given an excess of fresh transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana in addition to the regular feed. Ten days after the last administration of transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana, the mice were given a subcutaneous (s.c.) injection with Depo-Provera (Pfizer). Seven days after the Depo-Provera (Pfizer) injection, a follow-up administration (boost) of PBS buffer, 40 μl was given intravaginally (i.vag).
A fourth group was used as negative control, i.e. without any administration.
The immune response of the mice was analyzed with ELISA for antigen specific antibodies (IgG and IgA). Next, the strength of the immune response was tested by challenging the mice with Chlamydia trachomatis to see if protective immunity, or protective immune response, was obtained. Ten days after the last treatment, blood and vaginal samples were taken. The mice were again treated with Depo-Provera (Pfizer) during seven days and then challenged. Samples of blood and vaginal fluid were taken and analyzed with ELISA as described under “Verification of the constructed immunogene” above. When analyzing immune response in serum and vaginal secretion, immune response was strongest in the first group of mice. The second and third group showed a lower response (some mice were negative). Low levels of antibodies were detectable in vaginal secretion, primarily from mice in the first group.
The results are summarized in
As can be seen, the immunization clearly provides a protective effect. Mice from the first group were partially protected, with faster recovery than the control group.
Immune Response Induced in Mice by Recombinant Chimeric MOMP Protein without His/VS Tags
Three groups of ten age-controlled mice were given constructed MOMP chimera according to SEQ ID NO: 3, i.e. without His/V5 tags. Administration was conducted according to the following:
A first group was given a mixture of 10 μg purified MOMP chimera+1 μg CT adjuvant, 20 μl intranasally (i.n.) three times with ten day intervals. Ten days after the last administration of MOMP chimera+CT adjuvant, the mice were given a subcutaneous (s.c.) injection with Depo-Provera (Pfizer). Seven days after the Depo-Provera (Pfizer) injection, a follow-up administration (boost) of a mixture of 10 μg MOMP chimera+1 μg CT adjuvant, 40 μl was given intravaginally (i.vag).
A second group was given PBS buffer 20 μl intranasally (i.n.) three times with ten day intervals. Ten days after the last administration of PBS buffer, the mice were given a subcutaneous (s.c.) injection with Depo-Provera (Pfizer). Seven days after the Depo-Provera (Pfizer) injection, a follow-up administration (boost) of a mixture of 10 μg MOMP chimera+1 μg CT adjuvant, 40 μl was given intravaginally (i.vag).
A third group was used as negative control, i.e. without any administration.
The immune response of the mice was measured by challenging the mice with Chlamydia trachomatis. Ten days after the last treatment, blood and vaginal samples were taken. The mice were again treated with Depo-Provera (Pfizer) during seven days and then challenged. Samples of blood and vaginal fluid were taken and analyzed with ELISA as described under “Verification of the constructed immunogen” above.
The protective effect caused by immunization with the constructed MOMP chimera was studied in mice, infected by Chlamydia trachomatis, serovar D. The results, which are shown in
As can be seen, the immunization clearly provides a protective effect.
Fertility Study of Mice Induced with Recombinant Chimeric MOMP Protein without His/V5 Tags
In parallel with the immunization study discussed above, a fertility study was performed. Female mice previously immunized by recombinant chimeric MOMP protein according to SEQ ID NO: 3, i.e. without His/V5 tags were further studied in four groups of ten mice in each of the following groups:
A first group was unimmunized and healthy mice.
A second group was unimmunized mice, but infected with Chlamydia trachomatis, serovar D.
A third group was mice given a mixture of 10 μg purified MOMP chimera+1 μg CT adjuvant, 20 μl intranasally (in.) three times with ten day intervals. Ten days after the last administration of MOMP chimera+CT adjuvant, the mice were given a subcutaneous (s.c.) injection with Depo-Provera (Pfizer). Seven days after the Depo-Provera (Pfizer) injection, a follow-up administration (boost) of a mixture of 10 μg MOMP chimera+1 μg CT adjuvant, 40 μl was given intravaginally (i.vag). The mice were then challenged with Chlamydia trachomatis.
A fourth group was mice given a subcutaneous (s.c.) injection with Depo-Provera (Pfizer). Seven days after the Depo-Provera (Pfizer) injection, a follow-up administration (boost) of a mixture of 10 μg MOMP chimera+1 μg CT adjuvant, 40 μl was given intravaginally (i.vag). The mice were then challenged with Chlamydia trachomatis.
All mice were mated and thereafter weighed to identify pregnancy. The pregnant mice were put to death and the number of embryos was countered.
The purpose of the study was to investigate the constructed MOMP antigen's impact on fertility in mice. The numbers of embryos in immunized and non immunized mice challenged with Chlamydia trachomatis were compared.
The effect is registered as number of mice that produce offspring after they have been infected with Chlamydia trachomatis, serovar D and after that mated. As can be seen in
Thus, this study showed that Chlamydia trachomatis leads to infertility in 40% of the infected female mice while uninfected mice and mice that have been infected after administration of constructed MOMP chimera according to SEQ ID NO: 3 is 100% fertile. In an embodiment, a method is provided for inducing an immune response protective against Chlamydia trachomatis in a mammal, said method comprising administering to said mammal a therapeutically effective amount of the polypeptide according to the first aspect or the compound according to the second aspect or the composition according to the seventh aspect.
In an embodiment, said mammal is a human.
Although the present invention has been described above with reference to specific embodiments, it is not intended to be limited to the specific form set forth herein. Rather, the invention is limited only by the accompanying claims and, other embodiments than the specific above are equally possible within the scope of these appended claims.
In the claims, the term “comprises/comprising” does not exclude the presence of other elements or steps. Furthermore, although individually listed, a plurality of means, elements or method steps may be implemented by e.g. a single unit. Additionally, although individual features may be included in different claims, these may possibly advantageously be combined, and the inclusion in different claims does not imply that a combination of features is not feasible and/or advantageous. In addition, singular references do not exclude a plurality. The terms “a”, “an”, “first”, “second” etc do not preclude a plurality. Reference signs in the claims are provided merely as a clarifying example and shall not be construed as limiting the scope of the claims in any way.
Sequence Listing Free Text
In the sequence listing, the following artificial sequences have free text information:
SEQ ID NO: 4 V5 tag
SEQ ID NO: 5 His tag
SEQ ID NO: 10 VS2 primer, forward 1
SEQ ID NO: 11 VS2 primer, back 1
SEQ ID NO: 12 VS4 primer, forward 1
SEQ ID NO: 13 VS4 primer, back 1
SEQ ID NO: 14 VS2 primer, forward 2&3
SEQ ID NO: 15 VS2 primer, back 2
SEQ ID NO: 16 VS4 primer, forward 2
SEQ ID NO: 17 VS4 primer, back 2&3
SEQ ID NO: 18 VS4 primer, back, STOP
SEQ ID NO: 19 Linker sequence
SEQ ID NO: 20 Linker sequence
SEQ ID NO: 25 Linker sequence
SEQ ID NO: 26 Linker sequence
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1050535 | May 2010 | SE | national |
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/EP2011/058755 | 5/27/2011 | WO | 00 | 11/28/2012 |
| Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| WO2011/147975 | 12/1/2011 | WO | A |
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6235290 | Brunham | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6344202 | Brunham | Feb 2002 | B1 |
| 6696421 | Brunham | Feb 2004 | B2 |
| 6838085 | Brunham | Jan 2005 | B2 |
| 7063853 | Brunham | Jun 2006 | B1 |
| 7220423 | Brunham | May 2007 | B2 |
| 20010041788 | DeMars et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
| 20050232941 | Bhatia et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20080075717 | Tranchand-Bunel | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20090022755 | Barth et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 0915978 | May 1999 | EP |
| 1587825 | Oct 2005 | EP |
| 1868641 | Dec 2007 | EP |
| 2850384 | Jul 2004 | FR |
| 10-234395 | Sep 1998 | JP |
| 4249279 | Feb 2009 | JP |
| 9406827 | Mar 1994 | WO |
| 9511998 | May 1995 | WO |
| 9512411 | May 1995 | WO |
| 9631236 | Oct 1996 | WO |
| 9706263 | Feb 1997 | WO |
| 9802546 | Jan 1998 | WO |
| 9810789 | Mar 1998 | WO |
| 9828005 | Jul 1998 | WO |
| 9951745 | Oct 1999 | WO |
| 2004069140 | Aug 2004 | WO |
| 2006045308 | May 2006 | WO |
| 2006104890 | Oct 2006 | WO |
| 2007027954 | Mar 2007 | WO |
| 2007134385 | Nov 2007 | WO |
| 2008040757 | Apr 2008 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Ortiz et al., “T-cell epitopes in variable segments of Chlamydia trachomatis major outer membrane protein elicit serovar-specific immune responses in infected humans,” Infection and Immunity, 2001, vol. 68, No. 3,pp. 1719-1723. |
| Klein et al., “Detection of Chlamydia pneumoniae-specific antibodies binding to the VD2 and VD3 regions of the major outer membrane protein,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 2003, vol. 41, No. 5, pp. 1957-1962. |
| Murdin et al., “Poliovirus hybrids expressing neutralization epitopes from variable domains I and IV of the major outer membrane protein of Chlamydia trachomatis elicit broadly cross-reactive C. trachomatis-neutralizing antibodies,” Infection and Immunity, 1995, vol. 63, No. 3, p. 1116-1121. |
| Kalbina et al., “A novel chimeric MOMP antigen expressed in Escherichia coli, Arabidopsis thaliana, and Daucus carota as a potenial Chlamydia trachomatis vaccine candidate,” Protein Expression and Purification, 2001, vol. 80, pp. 194-202. |
| Findlay et al., “Surface expression, single-channel analysis and membrane topology of recombinant Chlamydia trachomatis major outer membrane protein,” BMC Microbiology, 2005, vol. 5, No. 5, doi:10.1186/1471-2180/5/5, 15 pages total. |
| Faros et al., “CD4+ T cells and antibody are required for optimal major outer membrane protein vaccine-induced immunity to Chlamydia muridarum genital infection,” Infection and Immunity, 2010, vol. 78, No. 10, pp. 4374-4383. |
| Farris et al., “Vaccination against Chlamydia genital infection utilizing the Murine C. muridarum Model,” Infection and Immunity, 2011, vol. 79, No. 3, pp. 986-996. |
| Schautteet et al., “Protection of pigs against gentital Chlamydia trachomatis challenge by parenteral or mucosal DNA immunization,” Vaccine, 2012, vol. 30, pp. 2869-2881. |
| Schautteet et al., “Protection of pigs against Chlamydia trachomatis challenge by administration of a MOMP-based DNA vaccine in the vaginal mucosa,” Vaccine, 2011, vol. 29, pp. 1399-1407. |
| Schautteet et al., “Chlamydia trachmatis vaccine research through the years,” Infectious Diseases in Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 2011, Article ID 963513, 9 pages total. |
| Xu et al., “Protective immunity against Chlamydia trachomatis genital infection induced by a vaccine based on the major outer membrane multi-epitope human papillomavirus major capsid protein L1,” Vaccine, 2011, vol. 29, pp. 2672-2678. |
| Zhu et al., “Identification of immunodominant linear B-cell epitopes within the major outer membrane protein of Chlamydia trachomatis,” Acta Biochim Biophys Sin, 2010, vol. 42, issue 11, pp. 771-778. |
| O'Meara et al., “Immunization with a MOMP-based vaccine protects mice against a pulmonary Chlamydia challenge and identifies a disconnection between infection and pathology—Manuscript Draft—” PLOS ONE, presented 2012, 40 pages total. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20130156805 A1 | Jun 2013 | US |
