The invention pertains to the manufacture of structural boards and, in particular, to a process and product utilizing a unique and plentiful source of raw material.
Oriented strand board (OSB) is a product used largely in the construction industry in place of plywood. Ordinarily, OSB sells for a price less than that of plywood. The economics are generally explained by the cost of raw material used to make these products. OSB is typically made from tree limbs sometimes called “round stock” that are too small in diameter and/or length to form lumber or plywood veneer. Supplies of round stock are limited both in volume and geography so that some price floor for this commodity necessarily exists. There remains, then, a need for a substitute material that can be at least competitive in price and availability with round wood for use in the manufacture of structural boards.
The invention provides a novel OSB construction that utilizes selected parts of oil palm tree frond cuttings as its raw material or base stock. This raw material is plentiful, low in cost, and, presently, can be a liability to growers and is largely going to waste. Frond cuttings are generated when oil palm fruit is harvested. Fronds are cut away to gain access to the fruit they naturally envelope. Currently, this harvesting is done manually, and the length of the frond cuttings is somewhat variable, but for reference purposes, may be roughly in the order of 1 to 2 meters with a woody section of a half meter with a cross-section of a frond roughly between 1/20 to 1/10 of a meter wide.
It has been discovered that a relatively high tensile strength shell part of an oil palm frond, when properly dried and separated from a low density frond core, such that it is in a strand-like form, can be processed into boards of commercial quality and strength.
The preferred strand forming process has the advantage of obtaining a relatively high yield of stranded shell material free or nearly free of the core material. As disclosed, the frond cut length or section is subjected to a planning operation in which cutting blades slice the frond length along lines that are generally parallel to the nominal length direction of the frond. This blade movement leaves the shell material in strand-like pieces that are severed away from the core. The core material is machine separated from the shell stock preferably by capitalizing on differences in density and fragment size of these two components. Typically, the cutting action is vigorous enough to knock loose large pieces of core material from the shell strands to which they may be attached that may have simultaneously sheared off with the shell material from the parent part of the frond cutting. In the disclosed board making process, the machined shell and core materials are separated from one another by impingement of an air stream directed against a flow of these mixed materials. The machine formed shell strands are thereafter generally aligned and coated with a binder and conveyed to a press. Typically, the binder is a thermoset resin. The press subjects the aligned and binder coated shell strands to heat and pressure sufficient to set the binder and produce a dense solid board.
The frond section or length 12 will characteristically have a modest bow or large radius of curvature and will typically be V-shaped in cross-section. Moreover, the frond length 12 has a relative hard and dense shell indicated generally at 13 associated with its exterior surfaces and a relatively soft core 14. When the frond section 12 is dry, the shell 13 is considerably harder than pine wood and the core 14 is nearly as soft as balsa wood. The volume of the core 14 substantially exceeds that of the shell 13.
In accordance with the invention, the frond section or length 12 can be processed to generate strands from the shell 13 and to separate the core material 14 from this stranded shell material.
At the lower end of the chute 16 is a rotary knife unit 17. The knife unit 17, power driven by a motor, not shown, has a cylindrical rotor 18 with a plurality of circumferentially spaced blades or knives 19 mounted in parallel alignment with the rotational axis of the rotor 18. The rotary knife unit 17 is oriented so that its axis of rotation is parallel to the preferred alignment of the frond sections 12 as determined by the lengthwise direction of the rectangular discharge area of chute 16. The blades 19 intercept and cut the frond sections 12 on lines parallel to their nominal longitudinal direction, first shearing off elongated strands of the shell 13 and, ultimately, shredding the core 14 into pieces. A gap between a restraining bar 21 at a side of the chute 16 where the blades 19 retire from the discharge area of the chute and the rise of the blades from an outer surface 22 of the rotor 18 is proportioned to assure that a frond section 12 will be cut into pieces of limited desired thickness.
The predominant lengths of strands 26 of the frond section 12 will be less than the full length of a frond section 12 owing to the natural bow of the section along its length and the straight character of the cutting edges of the blades 19. The strands 26, in general, will have aspect ratios of at least 2.
All of the material of the frond sections 12 being sheared by the rotary cutter 17 falls by gravity away from the cutting area at the bottom of the chute 16. A fan or blower 27 directs a strong air current transversely through a path of the falling shredded frond material. The velocity and volume of the air current is regulated to separate the strands designated 30 of the shell 13 from the shredded core material designated 28. This air separation works on the difference in bulk density between the relatively dense shell material 13 and relatively less dense core material 28. The core material 28 is deflected by the air stream to a chute 29 that directs it to a conveyor 31 which carries it to a collection point (not shown). The stranded shell material 30, owing to its greater density than that of the core material 28, is deflected by the air stream to a lesser extent and, consequently, falls into a chute 32 that directs it to a conveyor 33.
The stranded shell material 30, carried off by the conveyor 33 is ultimately processed into oriented strand board (OSB).
After being oriented, the shell strands 30 are coated for example, by spraying, with a binder as depicted in
The shell strands 30 conveyed to the press 41 are laying loosely on one another in a non-compacted state with a controlled thickness that can be received in the space between retracted platens as shown in
The platens 42 are internally heated to an elevated temperature sufficient to cure the binder while the shell strands 30 remain under pressure. The mats of shell strands 30, as depicted in
It should be evident that this disclosure is by way of example and that various changes may be made by adding, modifying or eliminating details without departing from the fair scope of the teaching contained in this disclosure. For example, OSB boards can be produced in a single platen press or in a continuous processing line using a series of pressing rollers. The invention is therefore not limited to particular details of this disclosure except to the extent that the following claims are necessarily so limited.
This application is a divisional of Ser. No. 12/102,050 filed Apr. 14, 2008, pending.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2986782 | Elmendorf | Dec 1956 | A |
3164511 | Elmendorf | Jan 1965 | A |
3202743 | Elmendorf | Aug 1965 | A |
3563844 | Brown | Feb 1971 | A |
3670791 | Johnson | Jun 1972 | A |
3793125 | Kunz | Feb 1974 | A |
4035120 | Eriksson | Jul 1977 | A |
4058201 | Etzold | Nov 1977 | A |
4096796 | Saunders et al. | Jun 1978 | A |
4112162 | Casselbrant | Sep 1978 | A |
4241133 | Lund et al. | Dec 1980 | A |
4246310 | Hunt et al. | Jan 1981 | A |
4339478 | Greten et al. | Jul 1982 | A |
4610913 | Barnes | Sep 1986 | A |
4751131 | Barnes | Jun 1988 | A |
5002713 | Palardy et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5017319 | Shen | May 1991 | A |
RE34283 | Barnes | Jun 1993 | E |
5274899 | Sentagnes et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5425976 | Clarke et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5435054 | Tonder et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5470631 | Lindquist et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5506026 | Iwata et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5539027 | Deaner et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5554429 | Iwata et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5585155 | Heikkila et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5736218 | Iwata et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5988537 | Marra | Nov 1999 | A |
6136408 | Radcliffe et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6383652 | Templeton et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6390161 | Freitag et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6451153 | Symons | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6461472 | Fujii | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6461743 | Tanzer et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6479127 | Kornicer et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6562479 | Smalley et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6589660 | Templeton et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6605245 | Dubelsten et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6620459 | Colvin et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6641909 | Wasylciw | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6756105 | Haataja | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6761798 | Altheimer et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6767490 | Sean et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6800352 | Hejna et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6818317 | Hejna et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6830784 | Gutowski et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6830797 | Haataja | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6846553 | Haataja et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6916523 | Haataja | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6926785 | Tanzer et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
20030026942 | Hejna et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030035921 | Kornicer et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030124305 | Haataja | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030180506 | Haataja | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040003984 | Bossler | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040063891 | Colvin et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040229010 | Clark et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050037202 | Hejna et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050126726 | Altheimer | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050142328 | Haataja | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050171313 | Colvin et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100316839 A1 | Dec 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12102050 | Apr 2008 | US |
Child | 12860878 | US |