The invention relates to a bit holder having an insertion projection and having a bore-shaped bit receptacle that has a longitudinal center axis, a convexly curved support surface being provided on a base part.
The invention further relates to a tool bottom part for reception of a bit holder.
DE 298 22 369 U1 discloses a tool combination made up of a tool bottom part and bit holder. Such tools are usually used on road milling machines, recyclers, earth stabilizers, etc. The tool bottom part is welded onto the circumferential surface of a tubular cutting drum. A plurality of tool bottom parts are associated with one another on the cutting drum surface in such a way that protruding cutting helices and transport helices are produced. The bit holders can be inserted replaceably into insertion receptacles of the tool bottom parts. The bit holders themselves receive, again replaceably, at least one bit, usually a round shank bit. During tool utilization, forces that are in some cases considerable are received by the bit and are transferred via the bit holder into the tool bottom part. Good bracing of the bit holder with respect to the tool bottom part is therefore of particular importance for a long service life of the tool system.
DE 298 22 369 U1 proposes a frustoconical connection between the tool bottom part and the bit holder. A base part of the tool bottom part has for this purpose a frustoconical projection that is inserted into a conical receptacle of the tool bottom part. A holding part is welded onto the base part, facing away from the frustoconical projection. This holding part is penetrated by a cylindrical bore into which the shank bit can be inserted with its shank. Under heavy tool loads, it can happen that while the conical connection reliably transfers the forces, the welded-on projection can nevertheless break away.
It is an object of the invention to make available a bit holder and a tool bottom part with which large tool loads can dependably be dissipated with a compact design.
The object relating to the bit holder is achieved in that the longitudinal center axis of the bit receptacle intersects the support surface. During tool utilization, the forces received via the bit are thus dissipated directly into the support surface. This makes possible a stable design that reliably withstands even large loads. A compact design is also achieved with this feature, so that the bit can be guided relatively close to the surface of the tubular milling drum. The torques that are acting can thereby be reduced.
According to a variant embodiment of the invention, provision can be made that the support surface has a spherical surface contour. By way of this spherical surface contour, a ball joint can be constituted between the bit holder and the tool bottom part. The cutting force profile varies during tool utilization. The large-area ball-joint-like connection always offers reliable bracing of the bit holder with respect to the tool bottom part for this varying force profile. As a result of the surface—relatively larger as compared with a flat area—offered by the spherical surface configuration, surface pressures can be reduced in the interest of a longer service life.
A compact design results in particular when provision is made that the base part is arranged in the attachment region onto the insertion projection.
It has been found that the radius of curvature of the support surface should be greater than or equal to 50 mm in order to correspond to the varying force profile. When the bit holder or tool bottom part is used for road milling machines, a radius of curvature in the range between 70 mm and 90 mm is suitable. Roadway surfaces are milled off in this application, and different milling depths are required. Both the forces and the force directions vary with the different milling depths. It has been found that with the aforesaid radius of curvature range, particularly good service lives are obtained for these different milling depths.
According to a preferred variant of the invention, provision can be made that the longitudinal center axis of the insertion projection with respect to the center point around which the support surface is curved is in the range between 1 mm and 20 mm.
The result is that the surface parts that are arranged respectively on either side of the insertion projection and are responsible for the support effect can be varied as the user desires, and the spacing causes formation of a lever arm by which torques can be intercepted.
One conceivable variant of the invention is such that the base part comprises a front-side skirt, and the support surface at least locally forms the underside of the skirt. Provision can further be made that side parts are laterally adjacent to the base part, and that the support surface at least locally forms the underside of the side parts. The skirt and the side parts thus form an enlargement of the support surface and contribute to reducing the surface pressures. The skirt and the side parts furthermore have a protective function, since they can be designed so that they cover the tool bottom part and protect it from the aggressive attack of the detached material.
A particularly preferred variant of the invention is such that a circumferential groove is arranged in the transition region from the insertion projection to the support surface. This groove can be designed so that it serves as a preset breaking point. In the event of an impermissible overload of the bit holder, the latter can then break off in defined fashion so that the expensive tool bottom part does not suffer any damage. Additionally or alternatively, the circumferential groove can also form a sealing element receptacle into which a sealing element is inserted. The sealing element thus seals off the entrance region into the insertion receptacle of the tool bottom part into which the insertion projection of the tool holder is inserted. This prevents fine particles of detached material from penetrating into the region of the insertion receptacle of the tool bottom part, where they might cause jamming of the insertion projection in the insertion receptacle.
The conformation of the bit holder can be such that the insertion projection comprises two regions having a cross section of different sizes, the region having the larger cross section being associated closer to the support surface than the region having the smaller cross section. This makes possible easier installation and removal.
A bit holder according to the present invention can also be such that the bit receptacle comprises a discharge opening, extending transversely to the longitudinal center axis, that opens up the bit receptacle laterally toward the environment; and that the discharge opening is open toward the support surface. The discharge opening is preferably provided on the back side of the bit holder, opened radially outward and oppositely to the tool advance direction V. During tool utilization, detached material that penetrates into the region between the shank bit and the bit holder can be expelled through the discharge opening.
Particularly simple production becomes possible when the insertion projection has a circular cross section; and that the insertion projection or the base part comprises a twist preventer in the form of a projection or a receptacle. The circular insertion projection can be manufactured, for example lathe-turned, in simple fashion.
Provision can be made in particular in this context that a projection or a receptacle, in particular a flattened area, is arranged at the region of the larger cross section and/or of the smaller cross section of the insertion projection. The projection or receptacle can serve as a twist preventer. These components can moreover also be used for improved energy transfer and to minimize surface pressures.
The object of the invention is also achieved with a tool bottom part that is embodied to receive a bit holder. In particular, the tool bottom part can also comprise a counter-surface that receives the support surface of the bit holder and forms a counter-contour corresponding to the support surface. The counter-surface can be embodied, in particular, spherically and concavely. Particularly preferably, the counter-surface is penetrated by the entrance opening of an insertion receptacle. The insertion projection of the bit holder can be slid into the insertion receptacle. If provision is made that the insertion receptacle transitions into the counter-surface via a seal receptacle embodied as a cross sectional enlargement, the entrance region of the insertion receptacle can then be sealed in simple fashion, such that the combination of the support surface with the counter-surface forms a mechanical shield for the seal. Provision can also be made that the counter-surface is breached by a rearward opening. This opening creates access to the bit receptacle in the bit holder, so that a correspondingly configured drift tool can be inserted and the shank bit can be driven out therewith. This opening can transition, facing away from the counter-surface, into a recess of enlarged cross section. The recess offers generous access to the opening. This has advantages in particular when detached material has collected in the region of the opening. It can then easily be cleaned off in order to reestablish access to the shank bit.
If provision is made that the opening or the recess is arranged at least in part in the region of the entrance of a threaded receptacle that opens into the insertion receptacle, easier access to the threaded receptacle is then also offered, and a fastening screw for immobilizing the bit holder in the tool bottom part can easily be screwed in and removed.
The invention will be explained in further detail below with reference to an exemplifying embodiment depicted in the drawings, in which:
As is evident from these depictions, tool bottom part 20 possesses a lower seating surface 21 that is embodied concavely and serves to position tool bottom part 20 on the outer contour of a tubular milling drum. Tool bottom part 20 can be connected to the tubular milling drum, by means of welded joins, in the side regions adjacent to seating surface 21.
It is apparent from
As is apparent from
The insertion projection 18 comprises two regions 18.3 and 18.4 having a cross-section of different sizes, the region 18.3 having the larger cross-section being associated closer to the support surface 10.1 than the region 18.4 having the smaller cross-section.
It is further evident from
In the assembled state, as is apparent from
Twist preventer 19 can be used to prevent the cylindrical insertion projection 18 from being twisted in insertion receptacle 26 of tool bottom part 20. Said preventer can, for example, abut against a shaped surface provided therefor in insertion receptacle 26 and can thus retain bit holder 10 in twistproof fashion.
In the present case, twist preventer 19 is made up of two flattened areas, abutting against one another, that are provided respectively on insertion projection 18 and in insertion receptacle 26.
An alternative variant configuration of a twist preventer 19 is shown in
Bit holders 10 depicted in the drawings are designed in a manner particularly favorable for manufacture. The contour that forms support surface 10.1 and the cylindrical external geometry of insertion projection 18 can thus be lathe-turned in one clamping, so that time-consuming reclamping operations are not necessary.
In the exemplifying embodiment, support surface 10.1 is provided on base part 11 and connects the latter integrally to insertion projection 18.
Alternatively in the context of the invention, support surface 10.1 can also be provided on a base part 11 of bit holder 10 which is arranged separately from insertion projection 18 and/or from projection 12.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2010 061 019 | Dec 2010 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2011/071585 | 12/2/2011 | WO | 00 | 8/8/2013 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2012/072783 | 6/7/2012 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2452081 | Sullinger | Oct 1948 | A |
3143177 | Galorneau et al. | Aug 1964 | A |
3498677 | Morrow | Mar 1970 | A |
3992061 | Rollins | Nov 1976 | A |
4240669 | Rollins | Dec 1980 | A |
4275929 | Krekeler | Jun 1981 | A |
4302055 | Persson | Nov 1981 | A |
4415208 | Goyarts | Nov 1983 | A |
4542943 | Montgomery, Jr. | Sep 1985 | A |
4650256 | Wetzinger | Mar 1987 | A |
4693518 | Sulosky et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4709614 | Klumpp | Dec 1987 | A |
4828327 | Wechner | May 1989 | A |
4915455 | O'Neill et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
5011229 | O'Neill et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5070609 | Teramachi | Dec 1991 | A |
5186575 | Wirtgen | Feb 1993 | A |
5322351 | Lent | Jun 1994 | A |
5378050 | Kammerer et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5529384 | Ojanen et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5573308 | Simons et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5683144 | Kammerer et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
6234579 | Montgomery, Jr. | May 2001 | B1 |
6244665 | Bise et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6619756 | Holl et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6619757 | Kammerer | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6644755 | Kammerer | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6685273 | Sollami | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6712431 | Bosch et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6764140 | Carson, Jr. et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6779850 | Schibeci et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6854810 | Montgomery, Jr. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6866343 | Holl et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
7086704 | Holl et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7300115 | Holl et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
D567270 | Chiang | Apr 2008 | S |
D574689 | Holl et al. | Aug 2008 | S |
D575610 | Holl et al. | Aug 2008 | S |
7461903 | Tewes et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
D585259 | Holl et al. | Jan 2009 | S |
7475949 | Helsel et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7537288 | Chiang | May 2009 | B2 |
7547075 | Tewes et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7597402 | Tewes et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7744164 | Hall et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7784875 | Holl et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7922256 | Kammerer et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7922257 | Kammerer | Apr 2011 | B2 |
D638453 | Buhr et al. | May 2011 | S |
8061783 | Keller et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
D657648 | Wachsmann | Apr 2012 | S |
D666226 | Buhr et al. | Aug 2012 | S |
D666641 | Buhr et al. | Sep 2012 | S |
D666642 | Buhr et al. | Sep 2012 | S |
D666643 | Buhr et al. | Sep 2012 | S |
D667854 | Kammerer et al. | Sep 2012 | S |
D667855 | Kammerer et al. | Sep 2012 | S |
D667856 | Kammerer et al. | Sep 2012 | S |
D671578 | Buhr et al. | Nov 2012 | S |
8622484 | Charlton | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8746807 | Lehnert et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
20020074850 | Montgomery, Jr. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20030146355 | Burr | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20040051370 | Montgomery, Jr. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20060119165 | Holl et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20080093912 | Willoughby | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20090085396 | Chiang | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090160238 | Hall et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090289493 | Holl et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090293249 | Lehnert et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100045094 | Sollami | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100076697 | Wagner et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20110006588 | Monyak et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110148178 | Lehnert et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110148179 | Lehnert et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110266860 | Charlton | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20130241264 | Lehnert et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130241265 | Lehnert et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2742849 | May 2010 | CA |
1942655 | Apr 2007 | CN |
101018927 | Aug 2007 | CN |
101091037 | Dec 2007 | CN |
101175895 | May 2008 | CN |
202595605 | Dec 2012 | CN |
202788849 | Mar 2013 | CN |
2940288 | May 1980 | DE |
3411602 | Oct 1985 | DE |
4322401 | Jan 1995 | DE |
29822369 | Mar 1999 | DE |
19908656 | Aug 2000 | DE |
10161009 | Nov 2002 | DE |
202005001311 | Mar 2005 | DE |
102005010678 | Sep 2006 | DE |
102005017760 | Oct 2006 | DE |
102005055544 | May 2007 | DE |
202007013350 | Feb 2008 | DE |
202007013350 | Mar 2008 | DE |
102004030691 | Dec 2008 | DE |
10261646 | Feb 2010 | DE |
202009014077 | Apr 2010 | DE |
102009059189 | Jun 2011 | DE |
001848938 | Apr 2011 | EM |
0706606 | Mar 1997 | EP |
0771911 | May 1997 | EP |
0997610 | May 2000 | EP |
4527043 | Oct 1970 | JP |
2008503669 | Feb 2008 | JP |
1020050091022 | Sep 2005 | KR |
407538 | Oct 2000 | TW |
I265836 | Nov 2006 | TW |
M326448 | Feb 2008 | TW |
M364551 | Sep 2009 | TW |
M378059 | Apr 2010 | TW |
2006056269 | Jun 2006 | WO |
2006119536 | Nov 2006 | WO |
2010051593 | May 2010 | WO |
2011004030 | Jan 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
U.S. Appl. No. 13/822,895, filed Mar. 13, 2013 to Lehnert et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/822,917, filed Mar. 13, 2013 to Lehnert et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/822,720, filed Mar. 13, 2013 to Lehnert et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 29/452,133, filed Apr. 12, 2013 to Buhr et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 29/452,136, filed Apr. 12, 2013 to Buhr et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 29/452,137, filed Apr. 12, 2013 to Buhr et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 29/452,139, filed Apr. 12, 2013 to Buhr et al. |
DE 102010061019.4 “Examination Report” Oct. 20, 2011, 4 pp. |
EP 11172525.5 “European Search Report” Dec. 8, 2011, 5 pp. |
EP 11172527.1 “European Search Report” Dec. 8, 2011, 5 pp. |
Co-pending U.S. Patent Application Publication No. US 2013/0241264 A1 published Sep. 19, 2013 to Lehnert et al. |
Co-pending U.S. Patent Application Publication No. US 2013/0241265 Al published Sep. 19, 2013 to Lehnert et al. |
English translation of Notification for the Opinion of Examination with translation of the search report, Taiwanese Application No. 100144345, mailing date Dec. 6, 2013, 4 pp. |
First Examination Report with English translation, Chinese Patent Application No. 201110395057.2, Applicant: Wirtgen GmbH, Mailing Date: Jan. 30, 2014, 11 pp. |
First Examination Report with English translation, Chinese Patent Application No. 201110394632.7, Applicant: Wirtgen GmbH, Mailing Date: Jan. 28, 2014, 19 pp. |
Office Action of Dec. 16, 2014 in co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/991,297. |
English translation of Notification for the Opinion of Examination issued for Taiwanese Application No. 100144345, mailed on Aug. 18, 2014, 3 pages. |
Written Opinion issued for Singapore parallel patent application 2013041637 mailed on Jun. 27, 2014, 13 pages. |
Written Opinion and Search Report issued for Singapore application No. 2013042320, dated on Jun. 5, 2014, 19 pages. |
First Office Action dated Jan. 28, 2014, in related Chinese patent application No. 201110394632.7, with English translation, 19 pages. |
English Translation of Notification for the opinion of Examination and search report from Taiwanese Patent Office mailed May 9, 2014, for related Taiwanese application No. 100144342, 6 pages. |
Notification of the First Office Action with English translation, Chinese Patent Application No. 201110395057.2, Applicant: Wirtgen Gmbh, Mailing Date: Jan. 30, 2014, 11 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130307318 A1 | Nov 2013 | US |