The invention relates to a bit holder for an earth working machine, in particular a road milling machine, that comprises a bit receptacle in the region of a working side of a support member and that indirectly or directly carries an insertion projection on an insertion projection side of the support member, the support member comprising two stripping surfaces that form a stripping surface pair and are at an angle to one another.
U.S. Pat. No. 3,992,061 discloses a bit holder that forms a support member having an integrally shaped-on insertion projection. The support member is penetrated by a cylindrical bore embodied as a bit receptacle. A working tool, in the present case a round-shank bit, can be inserted into the bit receptacle. The support member comprises two stripping surfaces, at an angle to one another, that serve for bracing against corresponding support surfaces of a base part. The base part comprises an insertion receptacle into which the bit holder can be replaceably inserted with its insertion projection. In the installed state, the stripping surfaces of the bit holder abut against the support surfaces of the base part. A clamping screw that clamps the insertion projection in the insertion receptacle of the base part is used in order to maintain a fixed correlation of surfaces.
During working utilization, the working tool engages into the substrate to be worked, in which context large working forces are transferred and are dissipated from the bit holder in the base part. The direction and also the magnitude of forces varies, under otherwise identical conditions, simply because of the fact that the working tool forms a chip that becomes thicker from the entry point to the exit point (comma-shaped chip). In addition, the force direction and force magnitude vary as a function of different parameters such as, for example, the milling depth, advance, material being worked, etc.
The configuration of a bit holder shown in U.S. Pat. No. 3,992,061 cannot discharge the working forces with a sufficiently good service life, especially at high advance speeds. In particular, the stripping surfaces quickly become deflected. In addition, the insertion projection is also exposed to large flexural stresses, creating the risk that an insertion projection breakage will occur after component fatigue.
DE 34 11 602 A1 discloses a further bit holder. This comprises a support member that is braced via projections against a base part. Shaped onto the support member is a clamping part that can be secured to the base part via key connections.
A further bit holder is known from U.S. Pat. No. 4,828,327. Here the bit holder is configured as a solid block that is penetrated by a bit receptacle. The bit holder furthermore comprises a threaded receptacle that is in alignment with a screw receptacle of a base part. A fastening screw can be passed through the screw receptacle and screwed into the threaded receptacle of the bit holder. Upon tightening of the fastening screw, the bit holder is pulled into an L-shaped recess of the base part and braced there against bracing surfaces. The bit holders are usually arranged protrudingly on the surface of a tubular milling drum. During working utilization, transverse forces also occur that act transversely to the tool advance direction. These transverse forces acting in the direction of the longitudinal center axis of the tubular milling drum cannot always be absorbed in sufficiently stable fashion with the bit holders described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,828,327. In particular, these transverse forces are transferred into the fastening screw, which is then highly loaded in shear.
The object of the invention is to create a bit holder of the kind mentioned previously that is notable for an extended service life.
This object is achieved in that the support member comprises a further stripping surface that is at an angle to the two stripping surfaces of the stripping surface pair.
According to the present invention, three stripping surfaces that are used to discharge loads into the base part are made available on the bit holder. The three stripping surfaces are at an angle to one another and thus form a three-side bracing member similar to a pyramid having a triangular base surface. This bracing member ensures that the bit holder is fixedly seated on the base part even when the direction of the working force changes. In addition, the three stripping surfaces also act to reduce the load on the insertion projection.
In the context of the invention, one or more additional stripping surfaces can also be added in combination with the three stripping surfaces in order to adapt the bit holder to a specific operational task. For example, four stripping surfaces that are all at an angle to one another can be used.
According to a preferred configuration of the invention, provision can be made that the two stripping surfaces of the stripping surface pair are arranged at least locally in front of the insertion projection in the advance direction of the bit holder, and a further stripping surface is arranged at least locally behind the insertion projection oppositely to the advance direction. Alternatively, provision can also be made that the two stripping surfaces of the stripping surface pair are arranged at least locally behind the insertion projection oppositely to the advance direction, and a further stripping surface is arranged at least locally in front of the insertion projection in the advance direction. The distribution of the stripping surfaces and the further stripping surface onto the regions of the bit holder in front of and behind the insertion projection optimally takes into account the force situation during working engagement. As explained above, a chip that thickens from the entry point to the exit point of the working tool forms. The working forces at the beginning of tool utilization are, in terms of their direction, more such that a load on the bit holder in front of the insertion projection occurs. The direction of the working force then changes, so that the regions behind the insertion projection are also increasingly loaded. The above-described arrangement of the stripping surfaces optimally takes into account the resulting load situation.
A load-optimized design results from the fact that the two stripping surfaces of the stripping surface pair and the at least one further stripping surface diverge from the insertion projection side toward the working side. The diverging stripping surfaces also form a prism-shaped bracing member in the region of the insertion projection side, and make possible here a reliable outward discharge of force.
To allow the bit holder to be installed on a tubular milling drum at different positions as both a left-hand and a right-hand part, a particularly preferred configuration of the invention provides that the at least one further stripping surface is embodied substantially symmetrically with respect to the center transverse plane extending in the direction of the longitudinal center axis of the insertion projection. Because the bit holder is configured symmetrically at its surface regions of the stripping surfaces that come into contact with the base part, identical load situations are achieved in the different installation positions.
Provision can preferably be made that a further stripping surface at least locally forms the underside of a front-side skirt of the bit holder. The front-side skirt usually covers a frontal region of the base part and thus protects it from wear. The fact that the front-side skirt is now also used to mount the stripping surfaces yields a compact design, and the bit holder is easy to produce.
Provision can also be made that a further stripping surface at least locally forms the underside of a rearward support projection. In certain utilization conditions, a large portion of the forces are transferred via the rearward support projection. The planar further stripping surface offers reliable bracing here.
As has already been mentioned above, the stripping surfaces of the stripping surface pair and the further stripping surface can form a three-surface bracing guide. The three stripping surfaces correspondingly form a pyramid having a triangular base surface as a bracing guide.
To allow reliable interception of the transverse forces occurring during working utilization, provision is made according to a variant of the invention that the lines normal to the stripping surfaces of the stripping surface pair point respectively to their bit holder side, viewed in the tool advance direction. The stripping surfaces of the stripping surface pair are thus correspondingly arranged, for example in the context of utilization of the bit holders on a tubular milling drum, with an inclination with respect to the rotation axis of the tubular milling drum. As a result of this arrangement, the transverse forces can reliably be intercepted. This arrangement may also be described as a configuration of the stripping surfaces so as to support the support member against forward and rearward forces and side to side forces orthogonal to the insertion direction.
Reliable installation of the bit holder in a base part is possible, even in austere construction-site service and at poorly visible locations, when provision is made that the stripping surfaces of the stripping surface pair enclose an obtuse angle, in particular in the range between 100° and 140°. This design moreover prevents jamming from occurring even after extended utilization when the stripping surfaces may wear away a little farther with respect to the support surfaces. The bit holder can thus always be replaced easily. In addition, this angled incidence of the stripping surfaces guarantees dependable discharge of working forces. In particular, the variation in working forces during tool engagement is taken into account.
A bit holder according to the present invention can be such that the stripping surfaces of the stripping surface pair and/or the at least one further stripping surface are connected to one another at least locally in the region of the insertion projection side via a transition segment. The stripping surfaces accordingly do not meet one another at the apex of the angle, so that a sharp-edged angular transition that can be damaged is not produced. In addition, a resetting region can also be created with the transition segment and in interaction with the base part. The bit holder can accordingly reset continuously into this resetting space when the stripping surfaces and/or support surfaces of the base part become worn, in which context the stripping surfaces always remain set against the support surfaces. In particular, planar abutment is maintained even if the bit holder needs to be exchanged for a new one, even repeatedly, on an existing base part.
Particularly preferably, the insertion projection is attached onto the insertion projection side at least partly in the region of the stripping surfaces of the stripping surface pair and/or of the at least one further stripping surface. A direct association between the stripping surfaces and the insertion projection thereby becomes possible, resulting in a smaller component size and moreover an optimized force path.
A bit holder according to the present invention can be characterized in that the longitudinal axis of the insertion projection and the longitudinal center axis of the prism formed by the stripping surfaces of the stripping surface pair enclose an angle in the range between 100° and 130°. Here as well, this configuration feature results in an optimized force path.
In a design that provides on the bit holder a bit receptacle, for example a bore, to receive a working tool, in particular a round-shank bit, provision is optimally made that the longitudinal center axis of the bit receptacle is arranged at least locally between the stripping surfaces of the stripping surface pair. The result is on the one hand that a good division of the working forces introduced via the working tool onto both stripping surfaces can be achieved. Furthermore, the bit holder can also be positioned in a different orientation with respect to a tubular milling drum, while reliable force transfer is still maintained.
It has been found that an optimum division, into longitudinal and transverse forces, of the forces to be discharged can be achieved if provision is made that the angle between the longitudinal center axis of the prism formed by the stripping surfaces of the stripping surface pair and the longitudinal center axis of the bit receptacle is in the range between 40° and 90°, particularly preferably between 50° and 80°. These angular positions also ensure that because of the incidence of the stripping surfaces of the stripping surface pair, the overall width of the bit holder does not become too great, thus guaranteeing a material-optimized design.
According to a further variant embodiment of the invention, provision can be made that the bit receptacle transitions into a flushing conduit, and that the flushing conduit emerges at least locally in the region between the stripping surfaces of the stripping surface pair. The flushing conduit is thus arranged so that the stripping surfaces do not meet one another at a sharp point.
If provision is made, according to a variant of the invention, that a first stripping surface of the stripping surface pair and the at least one further stripping surface are respectively incident to one another at an angle preferably in the range between 100° and 140° and form a support region, the bit holder can then be inserted into a likewise correspondingly configured angled bit holder receptacle of the base part and braced in stable fashion therein. The opening angle reflects a wide spectrum of directions from which forces can act in the course of tool engagement and as a result of changes in other parameters.
A particularly preferred variant of the invention is such that a plane receiving the angle bisector is arranged between the stripping surfaces of the stripping surface pair, and that the longitudinal axis of the insertion projection is arranged symmetrically with respect to that plane. As a result of this symmetrical configuration, the bit holder can also be installed at different installation positions on a tubular milling drum or the like, and this has the advantage that only one variant is needed and it is not necessary to work with left and right bit holders.
Additionally or alternatively, provision can be made that the longitudinal center axis of the insertion projection is at an angle in the range from −10° to +10° with respect to the angle bisector that is formed between the longitudinal center axis of the stripping surface of the stripping surface pair and the further stripping surface. A uniform preload is thus applied when the bit holder is secured to the base part. Provision is particularly preferably made in this context that this angle is in the range from −2° to +2°.
The invention will be further explained below with reference to an exemplifying embodiment depicted in the drawings, in which:
As
As is further evident from
As
As
It is evident from
It is evident from
Stripping surfaces 29.1 and 29.4 each form stripping surface pairs in the shape of a prism. These prisms have a longitudinal center axis MLL that is formed in the angle bisector plane between the two first stripping surfaces 29.1 and second stripping surfaces 29.4, respectively. These angle bisector planes are labeled “WE” in
For purposes of the present invention, for example, the first stripping surfaces 29.1 can be interpreted as stripping surfaces of the stripping surface pair, and one or both of the second stripping surfaces 29.4 as (a) further stripping surface(s). Conversely, the two second stripping surfaces 29.4 can also form the stripping surfaces of the stripping surface pair, and one or both first stripping surfaces 29.1 then form the further stripping surface(s). The “first/second stripping surfaces 29.1/29.4” terminology will continue to be used hereinafter.
The use of two stripping surface pairs having the respective first and second stripping surfaces 29.1 and 29.4 takes optimally into account the variation in working forces during tool engagement. A comma-shaped chip is produced during tool engagement. Not only the force magnitude but also the force direction changes as this chip is formed. Correspondingly, at the beginning of tool engagement the working force acts in such a way that it is dissipated more via the stripping surface pair formed by first stripping surfaces 29.1. As tool engagement progresses, the direction of the working force rotates and it is then dissipated increasingly via the stripping surface pair formed by second stripping surfaces 29.4. The angle γ′ (see
The central transverse plane MQ of bit holder 20 is labeled in
The advance direction is characterized in
The working force acts, however, not only in the direction of the image plane according to
Abutment surfaces 31.1 are arranged at a distance equal to distance dimension B from the attachment region of insertion projection 30 onto support member 21. The surface centroid of abutment surfaces 31.1 is arranged at a distance equal to distance dimension C from the surface centroid of pressure surface 32.1.
For installation of bit holder 20 into base part 10, insertion projection 30 is inserted into insertion receptacle 16.7. The insertion motion is limited by the first and second stripping surfaces 29.1, 29.4 that come to a stop against first and second support surfaces 16.1, 16.2.
As may be gathered from
Effective wear compensation can be implemented by the fact that bit holder 20 can reset into resetting spaces 16.3, 16.4, 16.5 in the event of wear; stripping surfaces 29.1, 29.4 extend beyond support surfaces 16.1, 16.2 at every point, so that in the event of erosion, support surfaces 16.1, 16.2 are in any case eroded uniformly without producing a “beard” or burr. This configuration is advantageous in particular when, as is usually required, base part 10 has a service life that extends over several life cycles of bit holders 20. Unworn bit holders 20 can then always be securely fastened and retained even on a base part 10 that is partly worn. It is thus also simple to repair a machine in which the tool system constituted by base part 10 and bit holder 20 is used. It is usual for a plurality of tool systems to be installed on such a machine, for example a road milling machine or surface miner, the base part usually being welded onto the surface of a tubular milling drum. When all or some of bit holders 20 are then worn, they can easily be replaced with new unworn or partly worn bit holders 20 (which can be used e.g. for rough clearing operations).
For replacement, firstly compression screw 40 is loosened. The worn bit holder 20 can then be pulled with its insertion projection 30 out of insertion receptacle 16.7 of base part 10, and removed. The new (or partly worn) bit holder 20 is then inserted with its insertion projection 30 into insertion receptacle 16.7 of base part 10. Compression screw 40 can then be replaced, if necessary, with a new one. It is then screwed into base part 10 and secured to bit holder 20 in the manner described.
It is evident from
The angular correlations of bit holder 20 according to the present invention will be discussed in further detail below.
It is evident from
In the same manner, the rear second stripping surfaces 29.4 are correspondingly also incident to one another at an angle ε2, as shown in
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2011 051 525 | Jul 2011 | DE | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2452081 | Sullinger | Oct 1948 | A |
3143177 | Galomeau et al. | Aug 1964 | A |
3498677 | Morrow | Mar 1970 | A |
3992061 | Rollins | Nov 1976 | A |
4180292 | Persson | Dec 1979 | A |
4240669 | Rollins | Dec 1980 | A |
4275929 | Krekeler | Jun 1981 | A |
4302055 | Persson | Nov 1981 | A |
4415208 | Goyarts | Nov 1983 | A |
4542943 | Montgomery, Jr. | Sep 1985 | A |
4650256 | Wetzinger | Mar 1987 | A |
4693518 | Sulosky et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4828327 | Wechner | May 1989 | A |
4915455 | O'Neill et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
5011229 | O'Neill et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5186575 | Wirtgen | Feb 1993 | A |
5322351 | Lent | Jun 1994 | A |
5378050 | Kammerer et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5529384 | Ojanen et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5573308 | Simons et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5683144 | Kammerer et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
6019434 | Emmerich | Feb 2000 | A |
6196636 | Mills | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6234579 | Montgomery, Jr. | May 2001 | B1 |
6244665 | Bise et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6619756 | Holl et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6619757 | Kammerer | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6644755 | Kammerer | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6685273 | Sollami | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6712431 | Bosch et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6764140 | Carson, Jr. et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6779850 | Schibeci et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6854810 | Montgomery, Jr. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6866343 | Holl et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
7086704 | Holl et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7300115 | Holl et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
D567270 | Chiang | Apr 2008 | S |
D574689 | Holl et al. | Aug 2008 | S |
D575610 | Holl et al. | Aug 2008 | S |
7461903 | Tewes et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
D585259 | Holl et al. | Jan 2009 | S |
7475949 | Helsel et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7537288 | Chiang | May 2009 | B2 |
7547075 | Tewes et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7597402 | Tewes et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7744164 | Hall et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7784875 | Holl et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7922256 | Kammerer et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7922257 | Kammerer | Apr 2011 | B2 |
D638453 | Buhr et al. | May 2011 | S |
8061783 | Keller et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
D657648 | Wachsmann | Apr 2012 | S |
D666226 | Buhr et al. | Aug 2012 | S |
D666641 | Buhr et al. | Sep 2012 | S |
D666642 | Buhr et al. | Sep 2012 | S |
D666643 | Buhr et al. | Sep 2012 | S |
D667854 | Kammerer et al. | Sep 2012 | S |
D667855 | Kammerer et al. | Sep 2012 | S |
D667856 | Kammerer et al. | Sep 2012 | S |
D671578 | Buhr et al. | Nov 2012 | S |
D692037 | Buhr et al. | Oct 2013 | S |
D692038 | Buhr et al. | Oct 2013 | S |
D692039 | Buhr et al. | Oct 2013 | S |
D692040 | Buhr et al. | Oct 2013 | S |
8622484 | Charlton | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8746807 | Lehnert et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
9151157 | Lehnert et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9260965 | Lehnert et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9719378 | Kluge et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
20020074850 | Montgomery, Jr. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20040051370 | Montgomery et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20060119165 | Holl et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20080093912 | Willoughby | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20090085396 | Chiang | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090160238 | Hall et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090289493 | Holl et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090293249 | Lehnert et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100045094 | Sollami | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100076697 | Wagner et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20110006588 | Monyak et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110148178 | Lehnert et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110148179 | Lehnert et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110266860 | Charlton | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20130241264 | Lehnert et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130241265 | Lehnert et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2742849 | May 2010 | CA |
1942655 | Apr 2007 | CN |
101018927 | Aug 2007 | CN |
101091037 | Dec 2007 | CN |
101175895 | May 2008 | CN |
202595605 | Dec 2012 | CN |
202788849 | Mar 2013 | CN |
2940288 | May 1980 | DE |
3411602 | Oct 1985 | DE |
4322401 | Jan 1995 | DE |
29822369 | Mar 1999 | DE |
19908656 | Aug 2000 | DE |
10161009 | Nov 2002 | DE |
202005001311 | Mar 2005 | DE |
102005010678 | Sep 2006 | DE |
102005017760 | Oct 2006 | DE |
102005055544 | May 2007 | DE |
202007013350 | Mar 2008 | DE |
102004030691 | Dec 2008 | DE |
10261646 | Feb 2010 | DE |
202009014077 | Apr 2010 | DE |
102009059189 | Jun 2011 | DE |
001848938 | Apr 2011 | EM |
0706606 | Mar 1997 | EP |
0771911 | May 1997 | EP |
0997610 | May 2000 | EP |
4527043 | Oct 1970 | JP |
2008503669 | Feb 2008 | JP |
1020050091022 | Sep 2005 | KR |
407538 | Oct 2000 | TW |
I265836 | Nov 2006 | TW |
M326448 | Feb 2008 | TW |
M364551 | Sep 2009 | TW |
M378059 | Apr 2010 | TW |
2006056269 | Jun 2006 | WO |
2006119536 | Nov 2006 | WO |
2010051593 | May 2010 | WO |
2011004030 | Jan 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
U.S. Appl. No. 13/822,720, filed Mar. 13, 2013 to Lehnert et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/976,861, filed Dec. 21, 2015 to Lehnert et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/989,837, filed Dec. 2, 2011 to Kammerer et al. |
DE 102010061019.4 “Examination Report” dated Oct. 20, 2011, 4 pp. |
EP 11172525.5 “European Search Report” dated Dec. 8, 2011, 5 pp. |
EP 11172527.1 “European Search Report” dated Dec. 8, 2011, 5 pp. |
English translation of Notification for the Opinion of Examination with translation of the search report, Taiwanese Application No. 100144345, dated Dec. 6, 2013, 4 pp. |
First Examination Report with English translation, Chinese Patent Application No. 201110395057.2, Applicant: Wirtgen GmbH, dated Jan. 30, 2014, 11 pp. |
First Examination Report with English translation, Chinese Patent Application No. 201110394632.7, Applicant: Wirtgen GmbH, dated Jan. 28, 2014, 19 pp. |
Office Action dated Dec. 16, 2014 in co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/991,297. |
English translation of Notification for the Opinion of Examination issued for Taiwanese Application No. 100144345, dated Aug. 18, 2014, 3 pages. |
Written Opinion issued for Singapore parallel patent application 2013041637 dated Jun. 27, 2014, 13 pages. |
Written Opinion and Search Report issued for Singapore application No. 2013042320, dated Jun. 5, 2014, 19 pages. |
First Office Action dated Jan. 28, 2014, in related Chinese patent application No. 201110394632.7, with English translation, 19 pages. |
English Translation of Notification for the opinion of Examination and search report from Taiwanese Patent Office dated May 9, 2014, for related Taiwanese application No. 100144342, 6 pages. |
Notification of the First Office Action with English translation, Chinese Patent Application No. 201110395057.2, Applicant: Wirtgen GmbH, dated Jan. 30, 2014, 11 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180016898 A1 | Jan 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15007644 | Jan 2016 | US |
Child | 15664137 | US | |
Parent | 13822917 | US | |
Child | 15007644 | US |