The invention relates to a bit holder for an earth working machine, in particular a road milling machine, having a support member onto which an insertion projection is indirectly or directly attached on an insertion projection side, the insertion projection comprising at least one convex abutment surface and one pressure surface.
A bit holder of this kind is known from EP 0 771 911 A1, in which the bit holder comprises an insertion projection having a frustoconical external geometry. The bit holder can be inserted, with the insertion projection, into a base part that is fastened on the surface of a tubular milling drum. A compression screw that acts on the insertion projection is used to immobilize the bit holder. The insertion projection is secured with the compression screw in a receiving bore of a bit holder. During operational utilization, large working forces are dissipated via the bit holder into the base part. The round shank cross section of the insertion projection prevents forces from being transferred in a circumferential direction of the insertion projection.
Large alternating loads are, however, introduced into a working tool held in the bit holder, and transferred into the base part. These alternating stresses load the mating surfaces between the bit holder and base part. Especially when milling very hard substrate coverings, such as e.g. concrete surfaces, it may happen that the seating surfaces between the bit holder and base part become spread apart or deflected. Secure retention of the bit holder in the base part is then no longer guaranteed. In particular, the base part must then be replaced, which is associated with a large outlay in terms of parts and installation.
Bit holders that make possible a certain resetting of the bit holder in the base part even in the event of wear are therefore used in order thereby to achieve a long service life.
A bit holder of this kind is presented in DE 43 22 401 A1. Here a pentagonal insertion projection is inserted into a correspondingly configured insertion receptacle of a base part.
The bit holder is braced with a support surface of its supporting member against a counter-surface of the base part, so that a large portion of the stresses can thereby be dissipated. With the pentagonal cross section of the insertion projection, transverse forces occurring during working are introduced via the insertion projection into the base part. In addition to the desired tensile stresses and the unavoidable flexural stresses, however, torsional stresses also occur in the insertion projection. A multi-axis stress situation thus exists.
The object of the invention is to create a bit holder of the kind mentioned previously, with which the working forces during working utilization can be dissipated in stress-optimized fashion into a base part.
This object is achieved in that the insertion projection comprises two convex abutment surfaces that are arranged at a distance from one another. The use of two convex abutment surfaces creates two abutment regions that ensure reliable bracing. In addition, the two abutment surfaces make it possible to implement a statically determined stress system.
Even if surface wear occurs, the two abutment surfaces can reset against the corresponding counter-surfaces of the base part so that the bit holder can be re-clamped. In addition, replacement of a worn bit holder in an existing base part is then also possible.
According to a preferred embodiment of the invention, provision can be made that the abutment surfaces are arranged at a distance from one another by means of a recess of the insertion projection. This recess is easy to manufacture in terms of production engineering, so that the bit holder can be produced with little outlay.
The abutment surfaces preferably have the same radius of curvature or the same curvature geometry, thereby enabling a simple geometry for the counter-surfaces of the base part into which the insertion projection is inserted.
Particularly preferably, the two abutment surfaces are arranged symmetrically with respect to the longitudinal center axis of the insertion projection, thereby making possible symmetrical force dissipation.
Particularly preferably, the abutment surfaces are located on an identical reference circle. Provision can further be made that the abutment surfaces have the same curvature center point, so that production is further simplified. For example, the abutment surfaces can be surface-turned or otherwise machined in one clamping.
It has been found that the radius of curvature of the abutment surfaces should be in the range between 16 mm and 32 mm. With smaller radii of curvature there is a risk of excessive surface wear under large loads. If the radius of curvature that is selected is too large, reliable securing of the insertion projection against the pressure surface can become problematic. It is particularly advantageous if the radius is a constant radius over the length of the abutment surfaces, resulting in a partly-cylindrical geometry of the abutment surfaces. This feature makes possible simple configuration of the insertion receptacle of a base part into which the insertion projection is inserted.
It has been found that for the required application instances in earth working machines, the dimension of the abutment surfaces in the direction of the insertion projection should be in the range between 20 mm and 50 mm. The clamping forces are then transferred from the bit holder to the base part in a manner optimized in terms of surface pressure. The dimension of the abutment surfaces in the circumferential direction should then be respectively in the range between 30° and 80°.
A bit holder according to the present invention can be such that the abutment surfaces transition via a convex transition region into the at least locally concavely embodied recess. A stress-optimized insertion projection cross section is thereby configured.
A bit holder according to the invention can be characterized in that the abutment surfaces are arranged at least locally in the region of the insertion projection front side facing in the tool advance direction, and the pressure surface is arranged in the region of the insertion projection back side.
In order to obtain a symmetrical force distribution, provision can be made that the abutment surfaces are arranged symmetrically with respect to the central transverse plane of the insertion projection extending in the direction of the longitudinal center axis of the insertion projection, and/or that the pressure surface is arranged symmetrically with respect to said central transverse plane. With the symmetrical arrangement of the abutment surfaces and the pressure surface, as well as the division of the abutment surface into a pair of distanced sub-surfaces, the reaction force to the contact pressure force that is introduced via the pressure surface is divided into a pair of forces, the vectors of the reaction force pair forming, with the vector of the contact pressure force, a system in which the vectors run toward one another in a star shape and meet at the center of the insertion projection.
To allow sufficient draw-in force to be exerted on the insertion projection via the pressure surface, provision can be made that the pressure surface is arranged at a distance of at least 20 mm (distance dimension A) from the attachment region of the insertion projection onto the support member. It is also conceivable for this purpose for the abutment surfaces to be arranged at a distance of at least 15 mm (distance dimension B) from the attachment region of the insertion projection on the support member.
Provision can also be made in the context of the invention that the surface centroid of at least one of the abutment surfaces is distant no more than 20 mm (distance dimension C), in the direction of the longitudinal center axis of the insertion projection, from the surface centroid of the pressure surface. Sufficiently large clamping forces can then be generated. This also creates a force relationship that enables smooth “sliding” between the insertion projection and base part, in which context the radial components of the clamping force are also absorbed via the abutment surfaces.
If provision is made that the abutment surfaces are formed by carrying segments that are elevated as compared with the actual insertion projection, then on the one hand a defined abutment geometry is created in the transition region to the base part. On the other hand, the abutment surfaces can then wear away on the carrying segments, while the defined abutment geometry is nevertheless maintained. Production is moreover also thereby simplified.
In order to generate a sufficiently large draw-in force in the direction of the longitudinal center axis of the insertion projection, and at the same time a clamping force acting perpendicular to the longitudinal center axis, provision is made according to the present invention that the line normal to the pressure surface is at an angle of between 30° and 70° to the longitudinal center axis of the insertion projection.
The invention will be further explained below with reference to an exemplifying embodiment depicted in the drawings, in which:
As
As is further evident from
As
As
It is evident from
The angle ε1 between first stripping surfaces 29.1 corresponds to the angle between first support surfaces 16.1 of base part 10.
It is evident from
Stripping surfaces 29.1 and 29.4 each form stripping surface pairs in the shape of a prism. These prisms have a longitudinal center axis MLL that is formed in the angle bisector plane between the two first stripping surfaces 29.1 and second stripping surfaces 29.4, respectively. These angle bisector planes are labeled “WE” in
The use of two stripping surface pairs having the respective first and second stripping surfaces 29.1 and 29.4 takes optimally into account the variation in working forces during tool engagement. A comma-shaped chip is produced during tool engagement.
Not only the force magnitude but also the force direction changes as this chip is formed. Correspondingly, at the beginning of tool engagement the working force acts in such a way that it is dissipated more via the stripping surface pair formed by first stripping surfaces 29.1. As tool engagement progresses, the direction of the working force rotates and it is then dissipated increasingly via the stripping surface pair formed by second stripping surfaces 29.4. The angle γ′ (see
The central transverse plane MQ of bit holder 20 is labeled in
The advance direction is characterized in
The working force acts, however, not only in the direction of the image plane according to
Abutment surfaces 31.1 are arranged at a distance equal to distance dimension B from the attachment region of insertion projection 30 onto support member 21. The surface centroid of abutment surfaces 31.1 is arranged at a distance equal to distance dimension C from the surface centroid of pressure surface 32.1.
For installation of bit holder 20 into base part 10, insertion projection 30 is inserted into insertion receptacle 16.7. The insertion motion is limited by the first and second stripping surfaces 29.1, 29.4 that come to a stop against first and second support surfaces 16.1, 16.2.
As may be gathered from
Effective wear compensation can be implemented by the fact that bit holder 20 can reset into resetting spaces 16.3, 16.4, 16.5 in the event of wear; stripping surfaces 29.1, 29.4 extend beyond support surfaces 16.1, 16.2 at every point, so that in the event of erosion, support surfaces 16.1, 16.2 are in any case eroded uniformly without producing a “beard” or burr. This configuration is advantageous in particular when, as is usually required, base part 10 has a service life that extends over several life cycles of bit holders 20. Unworn bit holders 20 can then always be securely fastened and retained even on a base part 10 that is partly worn. It is thus also simple to repair a machine in which the tool system constituted by base part 10 and bit holder 20 is used. It is usual for a plurality of tool systems to be installed on such a machine, for example a road milling machine or surface miner, the base part usually being welded onto the surface of a tubular milling drum. When all or some of bit holders 20 are then worn, they can easily be replaced with new unworn or partly worn bit holders 20 (which can be used e.g. for rough clearing operations).
For replacement, firstly compression screw 40 is loosened. The worn bit holder 20 can then be pulled with its insertion projection 30 out of insertion receptacle 16.7 of base part 10, and removed. The new (or partly worn) bit holder 20 is then inserted with its insertion projection 30 into insertion receptacle 16.7 of base part 10. Compression screw 40 can then be replaced, if necessary, with a new one. It is then screwed into base part 10 and secured to bit holder 20 in the manner described.
It is evident from
The angular correlations of bit holder 20 according to the present invention will be discussed in further detail below.
It is evident from
In the same manner, the rear second stripping surfaces 29.4 are correspondingly also incident to one another at an angle ε2, as shown in
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2010 061 019 | Dec 2010 | DE | national |
10 2011 051 523 | Jul 2011 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2011/071587 | 12/2/2011 | WO | 00 | 6/20/2013 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2012/072785 | 6/7/2012 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2452081 | Sullinger | Oct 1948 | A |
3143177 | Galorneau et al. | Aug 1964 | A |
3498677 | Morrow | Mar 1970 | A |
3992061 | Rollins | Nov 1976 | A |
4180292 | Persson | Dec 1979 | A |
4240669 | Rollins | Dec 1980 | A |
4275929 | Krekeler | Jun 1981 | A |
4302055 | Persson | Nov 1981 | A |
4415208 | Goyarts | Nov 1983 | A |
4542943 | Montgomery, Jr. | Sep 1985 | A |
4650256 | Wetzinger | Mar 1987 | A |
4693518 | Sulosky et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4828327 | Wechner | May 1989 | A |
4915455 | O'Neill et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
5011229 | O'Neill et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5186575 | Wirtgen | Feb 1993 | A |
5322351 | Lent | Jun 1994 | A |
5378050 | Kammerer et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5529384 | Ojanen et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5573308 | Simons et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5683144 | Kammerer et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
6234579 | Montgomery, Jr. | May 2001 | B1 |
6244665 | Bise et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6619756 | Holl et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6619757 | Kammerer | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6644755 | Kammerer | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6685273 | Sollami | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6712431 | Bosch et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6764140 | Carson, Jr. et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6779850 | Schibeci et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6854810 | Montgomery, Jr. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6866343 | Holl et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
7086704 | Holl et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7300115 | Holl et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
D567270 | Chiang | Apr 2008 | S |
D574689 | Holl et al. | Aug 2008 | S |
D575610 | Holl et al. | Aug 2008 | S |
7461903 | Tewes et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
D585259 | Holl et al. | Jan 2009 | S |
7475949 | Helsel et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7537288 | Chiang | May 2009 | B2 |
7547075 | Tewes et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7597402 | Tewes et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7744164 | Hall et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7784875 | Holl et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7922256 | Kammerer et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7922257 | Kammerer | Apr 2011 | B2 |
D638453 | Buhr et al. | May 2011 | S |
8061783 | Keller et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
D657648 | Wachsmann | Apr 2012 | S |
D666226 | Buhr et al. | Aug 2012 | S |
D666641 | Buhr et al. | Sep 2012 | S |
D666642 | Buhr et al. | Sep 2012 | S |
D666643 | Buhr et al. | Sep 2012 | S |
D667854 | Kammerer et al. | Sep 2012 | S |
D667855 | Kammerer et al. | Sep 2012 | S |
D667856 | Kammerer et al. | Sep 2012 | S |
D671578 | Buhr et al. | Nov 2012 | S |
8622484 | Charlton | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8746807 | Lehnert et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
20020074850 | Montgomery, Jr. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20040051370 | Montgomery, Jr. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20060119165 | Holl et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20080093912 | Willoughby | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20090085396 | Chiang | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090160238 | Hall et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090289493 | Holl et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090293249 | Lehnert et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100045094 | Sollami | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100076697 | Wagner et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20110006588 | Monyak et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110148178 | Lehnert et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110148179 | Lehnert et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110266860 | Charlton | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20130241264 | Lehnert et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130241265 | Lehnert et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2742849 | May 2010 | CA |
1942655 | Apr 2007 | CN |
101018927 | Aug 2007 | CN |
101091037 | Dec 2007 | CN |
101175895 | May 2008 | CN |
202595605 | Dec 2012 | CN |
202788849 | Mar 2013 | CN |
2940288 | May 1980 | DE |
3411602 | Oct 1985 | DE |
4322401 | Jan 1995 | DE |
29510913 | Nov 1995 | DE |
29822369 | Mar 1999 | DE |
19908656 | Aug 2000 | DE |
10161009 | Nov 2002 | DE |
202005001311 | Mar 2005 | DE |
102005010678 | Sep 2006 | DE |
102005017760 | Oct 2006 | DE |
102005055544 | May 2007 | DE |
202007013350 | Mar 2008 | DE |
102004030691 | Dec 2008 | DE |
10261646 | Feb 2010 | DE |
202009014077 | Apr 2010 | DE |
102009059189 | Jun 2011 | DE |
001848938 | Apr 2011 | EM |
0706606 | Mar 1997 | EP |
0771911 | May 1997 | EP |
0997610 | May 2000 | EP |
4527043 | Oct 1970 | JP |
2008503669 | Feb 2008 | JP |
1020050091022 | Sep 2005 | KR |
407538 | Oct 2000 | TW |
I265836 | Nov 2006 | TW |
M326448 | Feb 2008 | TW |
M364551 | Sep 2009 | TW |
M378059 | Apr 2010 | TW |
2006056269 | Jun 2006 | WO |
2006119536 | Nov 2006 | WO |
2010051593 | May 2010 | WO |
2011004030 | Jan 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
DE 102010061019.4 “Examination Report” Oct. 20, 2011, 4 pp. |
EP 11172525.5 “European Search Report” Dec. 8, 2011, 5 pp. |
EP 11172527.1 “European Search Report” Dec. 8, 2011, 5 pp. |
English translation of Notification for the Opinion of Examination with translation of the search report, Taiwanese Application No. 100144345, mailing date Dec. 6, 2013, 4 pp. |
First Examination Report with English translation, Chinese Patent Application No. 201110395057.2, Applicant: Wirtgen GmbH, Mailing Date: Jan. 30, 2014, 11 pp. |
First Examination Report with English translation, Chinese Patent Application No. 201110394632.7, Applicant: Wirtgen GmbH, Mailing Date: Jan. 28, 2014, 19 pp. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/822,895, filed Mar. 13, 2013 to Lehnert et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/822,917, filed Mar. 13, 2013 to Lehnert et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/989,837, filed Dec. 2, 2011 to Kammerer et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 29/452,133, filed Apr. 12, 2013 to Buhr et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 29/452,136, filed Apr. 12, 2013 to Buhr et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 29/452,137, filed Apr. 12, 2013 to Buhr et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 29/452,139, filed Apr. 12, 2013 to Buhr et al. |
Office Action of Dec. 16, 2014 in co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/991,297. |
English translation of Notification for the Opinion of Examination issued for Taiwanese Application No. 100144345, mailed on Aug. 18, 2014, 3 pages. |
Written Opinion issued for Singapore parallel patent application 2013041637 mailed on Jun. 27, 2014, 13 pages. |
Written Opinion and Search Report issued for Singapore application No. 2013042320, dated on Jun. 5, 2014, 19 pages. |
First Office Action dated Jan. 28, 2014, in related Chinese patent application No. 201110394632.7, with English translation, 19 pages. |
English Translation of Notification for the opinion of Examination and search report from Taiwanese Patent Office mailed May 9, 2014, for related Taiwanese application No. 100144342, 6 pages. |
Notification of the First Office Action with English translation, Chinese Patent Application No. 201110395057.2, Applicant: WIRTGEN GMBH, Mailing Date: Jan. 30, 2014, 11 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130270891 A1 | Oct 2013 | US |