Patent Application
20230115956
The present invention relates to a sodium-ion conducting material that protects the high voltage oxide cathode/sulfide solid electrolyte interface in sodium all-solid-state batteries.
Batteries for grid storage ideally employ low-cost materials and have long cycle life while also still having good energy density. While conventional liquid electrolytes have demonstrated good performance, they contain toxic and flammable materials. Such liquid electrolyte batteries, when used for grid storage applications, can run the risk of causing widespread damage from catastrophic fires. All solid-state batteries (ASSBs) have garnered increased attention in view of their superior characteristics relative to commercially-available liquid electrolyte batteries. In an ASSB, a non-flammable solid electrolyte is used instead of the liquid, making the battery inherently safer. A few of their advantages are the potential for increased energy density, the use of metallic anodes, and the improved safety of the non-flammable and non-corrosive solid-state electrolytes (SSEs). Solid-state electrolytes are also known to be more resistant to high temperatures, further mitigating safety concerns. For these reasons, research interest has continued to grow with regards to making better solid-state batteries.
Although there have been many advances in lithium-based solid-state batteries, their sodium counterparts have seen modest progress over the years. One of the main hurdles to commercialization of solid-state batteries has been the poor chemical and electrochemical stability between the solid-state electrolytes, which are typically sulfide-based, and sodium transition metal-based cathodes, usually oxide-based.
Sodium-based all-solid-state batteries have the potential to fill the growing demand for ASSBs. A typical rechargeable sodium ion secondary battery includes three main components: a positive oxide-based, transition metal-containing cathode, a negative metallic sodium anode, and a liquid electrolyte that can conduct sodium ions between these two electrodes. Incorporating sodium metal can be a challenge since it reacts with all the known electrolytes.
Much research has been focused on increasing the conductivity of SSEs themselves. The discovery and testing of various sulfide SSEs have proliferated due to the relative ease of processing and facile cell fabrication via cold-pressing. In sulfide-based sodium ASSBs, the sodium cations have more affinity with the oxide anions from the cathode compared with sulfide anions in the electrolyte based on the hard-soft acid base (HSAB) principle. Thus, transfer of sodium ions from sulfides to oxides will continually occur until equilibrium is reached. This degradation of the electrolyte will result in an interfacial layer that acts to suppress any ionic conduction across the interface.
In order to realize a practical ASSB, the chemical and electrochemical stability of the SSE against electrodes must be evaluated. Two major problems arise with sulfide solid electrolytes: first, sulfide SSEs are known to have a narrow electrochemical window. Exceeding this window, which occurs when a high voltage oxide cathode is used, leads to oxidative electrochemical decomposition of the solid electrolyte. Second, as described above, sulfide SSEs are intrinsically unstable against high voltage oxide cathodes, as the two battery components react at room temperature to form an ionically-and electronically-insulating layer. This layer, typically occurring at the cathode-electrolyte interphase (CEI), results in a low Coulombic efficiency (CE) during the first cycle and consequently a gradual increase in cell impedance. While protective cathode coatings have been used to improve the stability of the electrode-electrolyte interface, the chemical/electrochemical stability of the coating layer during prolonged cycling along with the electrochemical decomposition of sulfide SSEs during the first cycle still remain unavoidable challenges for sulfide SSEs when paired with a high voltage oxide cathode.
The motivation to search other chemical spaces comes from a recent report by X. Li, et al. (Energy Environ. Sci. 12, 2665-2671 (2019)) on new lithium-conducting SSEs, namely the halide-based Li3YCl6 (LYC) and Li3YBr6 (LYB). The room temperature Li+ conductivity of these compounds is 0.5 mS/cm and 0.7 mS/cm, respectively, making them suitable as solid-state electrolytes in ASSBs. In this report, LYC or LYB was used as the electrolyte in a solid-state cell composed of a Li-In alloy anode and a LiCoO2 (LCO) cathode; notably, no protective coating was used on LCO, yet a first cycle Coulombic efficiency of ~94% was achieved with good capacity retention over 100 cycles. This stable cycling indicates that these halide-based SSEs have a much wider electrochemical window than sulfides, further evidenced by the lack of a protective coating.
The sodium analogues of lithium-conducting SSEs have also been explored, as sodium is a more abundant material generally and often behaves similarly to lithium in electrochemical materials. Sodium, having the second-lowest electrochemical potential versus SHE (-2.70 V to Lithium’s -3.07 V), is commonly touted as a potential cost-effective option for batteries, especially those for large-scale grid storage applications, where operating cost is more strongly emphasized than energy density. See, e.g., Y. Wang, et al., Nano Mater. Sci. 1, 91-100 (2019). As such, the development of new sodium electrolytes, which involves an understanding of their operating mechanisms and compatibility with common sodium battery electrodes, remains of significant interest.
Atomic substitution of chloride-based sodium solid electrolytes has not previously been reported. Their lithium counterparts, which have been reported in literature, do not need such atomic substitution as their conductivity is high enough for use in batteries. Chloride-based sodium-ion (Na+) conductors, previously reported to have much wider electrochemical stability windows than their sulfide counterparts, are ripe for exploration and incorporation into sodium all-solid-state batteries.
Notwithstanding the aforementioned advancements, the need remains for materials to address the multitude of obstacles to the commercialization of efficient ASSBs. The present invention is directed to such a need.
In one aspect of the invention, a novel chlorine-based material is provided that can conduct sodium ions as well as having higher intrinsic chemical and electrochemical stability with high voltage cathodes, preventing unwanted reactions between the solid-state electrolyte and cathode, leading to the ability for more stable battery cycling.
A novel class of materials — chloride-based sodium-ion (Na+) conductors— is useful in a cathode composite in ASSBs that contain an oxide cathode in order to prevent decomposition of the sulfide electrolyte and unwanted interfacial chemical reactions that ultimately lead to degradation of solid-state battery performance. In one embodiment, the new class of Na+ conductors is based on the halide parent compound Na3YCl6, which, for brevity, will be referred to herein as “NYC”.
Na3-xY1-xZrxCl6 (with 0 < x < 1, herein referred to as “NYZC”) compounds were synthesized and their electrochemical performance evaluated. Given the wider electrochemical window of NYZC (upwards of 3.8 V) and superior chemical stability when in contact with oxide cathodes, the material could be incorporated into a sodium ASSB containing oxide cathode NaCrO2, notably without the use of any protective coatings on the cathode side. Such an ASSB can last several hundreds of cycles even at C/2, making it one of the best performing all solid-state Na-ion batteries reported to date.
Through the use of computational methods and ab initio molecular dynamics (AIMD) simulations, it was found that aliovalent substitution, namely substitution by Zr4+, Hf4+, or Ti4+ for Y3+, and by Ca2+ or Sr2+ for Na+, drastically improved the sodium diffusion properties of the material no matter the dopant element. Since it was found to be energetically favorable to substitute Zr4+ for Y3+ in the crystal, this substitution was experimentally demonstrated and tested. Substitution of Zr4+ for Y3+ leads to the chemical formula Na3-xY1-xZrxCl6 (NYZC), with 0 < x < 1. The electrochemical properties of a series of Na3-xY1-xZrxCl6 compounds, such as their reaction energy with electrodes, electrochemical window, and electrochemical performance, were computationally and experimentally evaluated. After the incorporation of NYZC in a model sodium ASSB (containing Na-Sn 2:1 alloy as the anode, Na3PS4 as the electrolyte, and NaCrO2 as the cathode), the first cycle Coulombic efficiency (CE) drastically increased from ~72% to ~95% and the ASSB displayed relatively stable electrochemical performance over hundreds of cycles without drastic capacity fade.
The novel materials described herein allow the fabrication of stable high voltage sodium all solid-state batteries for potential use in grid-scale energy storage applications. Batteries for grid storage ideally employ low-cost materials and have long cycle life while also still having good energy density. Sodium-based all-solid-state batteries have the potential to fill this need in order to enable commercialization of such batteries.
In one aspect of the invention, a composition for sodium-based all-solid-state batteries includes a halide compound comprising a chloride-based sodium solid electrolyte, wherein sodium diffusivity within the halide compound is enhanced through substitution of one or more of Zr, Ti, Hf, Ta, Ca, Sr, Mg, and Fe. In some embodiments, the electrolyte is based on a parent compound Na3YCl6. The electrolyte may be an engineered framework with Na-deficiency compared to the parent Na3YCl6. In some embodiments, the electrolyte is Na3-xY1-xZrxCl6 where 0 < x < 1, and further may be Na2.25Y0.25Zr0.75Cl6.
In another aspect of the invention, a sodium-based all-solid-state battery includes a sodium-based solid electrolyte, and a composite cathode including an oxide cathode and a chloride-based sodium solid electrolyte, wherein sodium diffusivity within the electrolyte is enhanced through substitution with one or more of Zr, Ti, Hf, Ta, Ca, Sr, Mg, and Fe. In some embodiments, the sodium-based solid electrolyte may be a sulfide and may be Na3PS4 and the oxide cathode is a transition metal oxide, NaCrO2. The battery may further include an anode comprising NaxSn, NaxSb, or NaxSbySn1-y alloys. In some embodiments, the sodium-based solid electrolyte in the battery is stable with the alloy anodes. The battery may have a capacity retention of greater than 80% after more than 200 cycles, preferably 80% after more than 500 cycles, and more preferably, more than 89% after 1000 cycles.
In still another aspect, a sodium-based all-solid-state battery having a sodium-based solid-state electrolyte and an oxide cathode is characterized in that one or more metallic elements M selected from Ca, Sr, Ti, Zr, Hf, Ta, Ca, Sr, Mg, and Fe are substituted into pristine Na3YCl6 at Na or Y sites to define a buffer layer between the sodium-based solid electrolyte and the cathode. In some embodiments, the sodium-based solid electrolyte may be a sulfide and may be Na3PS4 and the oxide cathode is a transition metal oxide, NaCrO2. The battery may further include an anode comprising NaxSn, NaxSb, or NaxSbySn1-y alloys. In some embodiments, the sodium-based solid electrolyte in the battery is stable with the alloy anodes. The buffer layer may be an engineered framework with Na-deficiency compared to the parent Na3YCl6 and in some embodiments is Na3-xY1-xZrxCl6, where 0 < x < 1, or is Na2.25Y0.25Zr0.75Cl6. The battery may have a capacity retention of greater than 80% after more than 200 cycles , preferably 80% after more than 500 cycles, and more preferably, more than 89% after 1000 cycles.
In yet other aspect, a composition comprises a sodium-ion conducting material configured for use as an interface between a high voltage oxide cathode and a sodium-based solid electrolyte in a sodium all-solid-state battery, wherein the material is based on a parent compound Na3YCl6. In some embodiments, the parent compound is substituted with one or more of Zr, Ti, Hf, Ta, Ca, Sr, Mg, and Fe. In other embodiments, the material is Na3-xY1-xZrxCl6, where 0 < x < 1, or Na2.25Y0.25Zr0.75Cl6. In some embodiments, the sodium-based solid electrolyte may be a sulfide and may be Na3PS4 and the oxide cathode may be a transition metal oxide, NaCrO2.
The inventive material starts with the Na3YCl6 parent compound. 4+ ions are preferentially found to take the place of yttrium, so that, upon elemental substitution, the empirical formula becomes Na3-xY1-xAxCl6, where A═Hf, Zr, Ti and 0<x<1. In addition, 2+ ions can take the place of the sodium atom, meaning the formula will become Na3-2xBxYCl6, where B═ Ca, Sr. Sodium vacancies are created in both cases to balance the charge.
Experimental synthesis of the parent Na3YCl6 (“NYC”) compound was carried out by mixing NaCl and YCl3 in stoichiometric amounts in a mortar and pestle. After ball milling for 2 hours at 500 rpm, the material was flame sealed in a quartz tube and heated at 500° C. for 24 hours. Afterwards, the material was ball milled again for 4 hours at 400 rpm to get the final powder. Characterization of the material was carried out via X-ray diffraction in a sealed boron-rich capillary tube. To incorporate zirconium, a third salt, ZrCl4, was introduced before the mixing and heating process. The compositions of Na3-xY1-xZrxCl6, made at every x=0.125 increment, were carried out using the appropriate ratio of NaCl to YCl3 to ZrCl4. For all samples, XRD was performed and the conductivity was measured in the same way, by pressing a pellet in a 10 mm-diameter PEEK mold using titanium plungers. Further details of the synthesis, fabrication and testing procedures are provided below.
Methods: All density functional theory (DFT) calculations were performed using the Vienna Ab initio Simulation Package (VASP) package (University of Vienna) within the projector augmented wave (PAW) method. The Perdew-Burke-Emzerhof generalized-gradient approximation (GGA) was used to model the exchange-correlation for all chemistries. A plane-wave cut-off 520 eV was used for all cases to keep consistent with Pymatgen package settings. All input file generation and analysis of results were performed using Pymatgen and pymatgen-diffusion packages as are known in the art.
Generation of the set of structures and geometry analysis: The Materials Project (MP) open source library and the Inorganic Crystal Structure Database (ICSD) (FIZ Karlsruhe) are the source of crystallographic data in the computation. Additional precomputed crystalline data, such as the space group, the band gap, the energy above hull (Ehull) and the decomposition products, were also extracted from MP database using the Materials Project API.
The structures of Na3YCl6 and Na3YBr6 were extracted from MP database, which are indexed as mp-31362 (ICSD#59886) and mp-29080 (ICSD#82355), respectively. Aliovalent-doping or substitution of selected metallic elements M (M = Ca, Sr, Ti, Zr, Hf, Ta) into pristine Na3YCl6 at Na or Y sites were performed to identify the promising optimization strategies.
Identifying a new compound from experimental XRD data alone can be challenging. In this study, Na2ZrCl6, having a distinct crystal structure, was investigated in order to determine the structure. Three groups of theoretical structures were generated: (a) substituted Zr at Y sites using the 3 pristine Na3YCl6 structures (mp-675104, mp-31362 & mp-1111487); (b) substituted all structures in MP database matching the formula of A2MX6 to Na2ZrCl6; (c) utilized the compound prediction tool in Pymatgen package to generate all possible compounds in Na—Zr—Cl chemical space. All candidate structures were fully relaxed, and the experimental structure was successfully obtained from the pool.
Topological analysis of the framework chemistries was performed using Zeo++, an open-source topological analysis package. The quantity of interest is the largest included sphere radius along the free sphere path Rinc. This gives an estimate of the diffusion channel size which is associated with the ionic conductivity of the material.
To determine the reaction energy between two components, the phase diagram between the two reactants was constructed. The energy of the energetically most favored reaction is used to represent the reaction energy between the contacting interface (e.g., the selected electrolyte/cathode interface).
Kinetic simulations to study the diffusion properties of candidates: The diffusivity and conductivity of the selected compounds including NYC and NYC-derivatives were calculated using non-spin polarized Ab-initio Molecular Dynamics (AIMD) in NVT ensemble. A smaller plane-wave energy cutoff was selected as 280 eV. Supercells with the minimum dimension larger than 10 Å and a minimal Γ-centered 1×1×1 k-mesh are used. The time step was set to 2 fs. All AIMD calculations were performed using automated in-house AIMD workflow program. Diffusivities were obtained at the range of temperature between 400 K and 1200 K depending on the melting point of the material. Activation energy is obtained by plotting a converged Arrhenius plot at selected temperatures using the Nernst-Einstein relation. Selective dynamic scheme was also applied to Zr doped/substituted-NYC compositions to understand the effect of Cl motion on the Na diffusion mechanism. Climbing image nudged elastic band calculations (CI-NEB) calculations are applied to get the activation energy of a Na-ion migration path29 for NYC and NYC substituted by Zr at Y site.
Machine learning interatomic potential and molecular dynamic simulations: The moment tensor potential (MTP) for NYZC0.75 was developed using the open-source Materials Machine Learning (maml) Python package. The training data comprises 800 snapshots extracted at 400 fs intervals from AIMD NVT simulations at 600 K, 800 K, 1000 K, and 1200 K. Static DFT calculations were then performed to obtain accurate energies and forces. A training:test split of 90:10 was used to train the machine learning model. The MTP cutoff radius and the maximum level of basis functions, levmax were chosen to be 5.0 Å and 14, respectively. The mean absolute error (MAE) on the energies and forces were 1 meV atom-1 and 63.5 meV Å-1, respectively. NPT MD simulations using the MTP were carried out using LAMMPS.4 The simulation time was at a least amount of 10 ns with a 2 fs time step. A 4 × 4 × 4 supercell of the NYC0.75 with 592 atoms was used.
Electrolyte Synthesis: All fabrication processes were conducted in an Ar-filled glovebox (mBraun 200B, H2O ppm <0.5, O2 ppm < 1), unless otherwise noted. Stoichiometric amounts of the precursors NaCl (>99%, Sigma Aldrich), YCl3, (99.9%, Sigma Aldrich) were hand-mixed in a mortar and pestle for 10 minutes and the powder mixture was placed in a 50 mL ZrO2 ball mill jar (Retsch Emax) with eleven 10 mm-diameter Y—ZrO2 milling balls. The mixture was milled for 2 hours at 500 rpm. The material was extracted from the jars in the glovebox, pelletized at a pressure of 370 MPa with a 13 mm pellet die (Carver), loaded into a quartz tube, flame sealed, and heated in a box furnace (Lindberg Blue M) at 500° C. for 24 hours. For uniformity, the material was ball milled again after heat treatment using 88 5 mm diameter Y-ZrO2 milling balls for a duration of 4 hours. The material was extracted and stored in the glovebox for further testing.
For the Zr substitutions, the aforementioned procedure was conducted, except with the introduction of ZrCl4 (99.99%, Sigma Aldrich) as a third precursor and the reagent ratios adjusted accordingly.
Characterization - XRD: Powder samples were loaded into 0.5 mm-diameter boron-rich capillary tubes (Charles Supper). The tube opening was capped with clay and wrapped in paraffin film before it was brought outside of the glovebox to be flame-sealed with a butane torch. The samples were measured on a Bruker Kappa goniometer equipped with a Bruker Vantec 500 detector. The sample was placed in the Bragg-Brentano θ-θ configuration and the Debye-Scherrer method was used for measurements. XRD data was collected using Cu Kα radiation at 45 kV and 50 mA, over a 2θ range of 5-90° with a step size of 0.01°.
For Synchrotron XRD, the samples were prepared by loading the powders into polyimide tubes in the glovebox and were subsequently sealed with epoxy.
Electrochemical Characterization: The powder was pressed at 370 MPa into a 10 mm polyether ether ketone (PEEK die) using two titanium plungers. On both sides of the pellet, acetylene black (AB) was added for better contact with the current collectors; once added, the AB was pressed at 370 MPa using the titanium plungers. The cell configuration was secured into a cell holder and connected to a Solartron 1260 impedance analyzer. Impedance measurements were taken with an applied AC potential of 30 mV over a frequency range of 1 MHz to 1 Hz. Temperature-dependent EIS measurements were also conducted within the glovebox; the sample was heated from 20° C. to 100° C. and EIS measurements were recorded at every 20° C. increment. Measurements were taken only after the sample was held at the target temperature for over an hour to allow for equilibration. The heating rate was 2° C./min. The activation energy (Ea) was calculated from the slope of the resulting Arrhenius plot.
The model all solid-state battery contains the NaCrO2 positive electrode, a Na-Sn (2:1) negative electrode, and Na3PS4. The positive electrode is then mixed into a composite with a weight ratio of 11:16:1 of NaCrO2:solid electrolyte:vapor-grown carbon fibers (VGCF, Sigma Aldrich) The all solid-state battery is manufactured through mechanical pressing; 75 mg of Na3PS4 powder is pressed first at 370 MPa, then about 12 mg of the composite NaCrO2 powder is placed on one side of the Na3PS4 pellet and pressed at the same pressure, and then on the opposite side of the Na3PS4, an excess of Na—Sn 2:1 alloy (35 mg) is pressed at the same pressure. After securing the cell in a cell holder, the electrical leads were connected to the electrochemical cycler (Landhe). The current used was 50 µA which corresponded to a rate of C/10.
To incorporate the NYZC material into the model ASSB, the NYZC would take the place of Na3PS4 in the composite cathode (still hand-mixed with the same 11:16:1 ratio). 15 mg of NYZC would either be pressed on top of Na3PS4 before pressing the composite cathode to make a “bilayer cell”, or simply the NYZC-containing composite cathode would be pressed onto Na3PS4 to make the “monolayer” cell. For cells cycled at 40° C., the cell assemblies were placed into a compact muffle furnace (MTI KSI-1100X) within the Ar-filled glovebox. After cycling, the cell was disassembled to characterize any material changes.
X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS): The powders were adhered onto a small metallic sample stub (Shimadzu Corporation, Kyoto, Japan) with carbon tape. The stub was placed into a custom 3-D printed holder inside a 30 mL LDPE bottle and the lid secured with paraffin film. The bottle was placed into a metallic tube and sealed inside the glovebox with clamps.
The metallic canister was placed into a N2 glovebox that is attached to the XPS tool (Kratos Axis Supra from Kratos Analytical Ltd., Manchester, UK), where the sample can be transferred into the analysis chamber without any exposure to ambient air. All measurements were taken using 15 kV Al Kα radiation at a chamber pressure less than 5 × 10-8 torr. For the wide survey scans, a pass energy of 160 eV and a dwell time of 100 ms was used, but for specific element regions, a pass energy of 20 eV, a dwell time of 300 ms, and a step size of 0.05 eV was used. The charge neutralizer was enabled during all the measurements. Data calibration and analysis were conducted by the CasaXPS software (Casa Software Ltd.), and all region spectra were calibrated using the C 1s peak.
Results and Discussion: Na3YCl6 was first synthesized using a combination of NaCl and YCl3 precursors. To verify its synthesis, air-sensitive capillary X-ray diffraction (XRD) was conducted on NYC. Rietveld Refinement was conducted using the FullProf software suite; the crystal structure of this compound was found to be monoclinic, with space group P21/n. The XRD pattern is shown in
To computationally evaluate the Na+ diffusion properties of these compounds, the Na mean-squared displacement (MSD) was obtained through AIMD simulations for all NYC compounds (and for isostructural bromine, Na3YBr6). The results are provided in
To modify such a compound in order to increase its ionic conductivity, aliovalent doping is a promising avenue. Starting from a defect-free crystal where all sites are occupied and there are no channels for ions to migrate, aliovalent doping introduces interstitials or vacancies in the SSE structure which can enhance Li+ or Na+ diffusion. To explore this, elements that can substitute into NYC were identified by computational methods.
Na3PS4 (NPS) as a reference.
To illustrate that Zr was experimentally incorporated, XPS was conducted on NYC and NYZC0.5. The region scans of the Na 1s, Y 3d, Cl 2p, and Zr 3d binding energy regions are shown, respectively, for NYC (
To elucidate the structure of NZC, Rietveld refinement was carried out on synchrotron XRD data (λ = 0.1668 Å).
As previous studies have shown, the ionic conductivity is not the only metric that determines the overall performance of an SSE for ASSB applications. Finding chemically compatible electrodes is of vital importance for stable, long-term cycling of an ASSB. Chemical and electrochemical stability between the solid electrolyte and electrodes are required for an efficient solid-state battery. Thus, we evaluated the electrochemical and chemical stability of the highest conductive composition, Na2.25Y0.25Zr0.75Cl6, before testing it in an ASSB.
Electrochemical stability windows were determined for Na2.25Y0.25Zr0.75Cl6 as well as the end-member compound NYC and Na3PS4 (NPS). The results are shown in Table 4 with the computed reaction Energies (with NaCrO2 and Na metal) and the electrochemical windows of NYC, Na2.25Y0.25Zr0.75Cl6, and Na3PS4.
The incorporation of Zr narrows the electrochemical window on the anode side while the upper limit (cathode side) is maintained. This is mainly due to the higher thermodynamic reduction potential of Zr4+ compared to Y3+ (the oxidation potential contribution is independent of the metal oxidation state as both Y and Zr are in their highest oxidation state). Compared to the upper voltage stability limit of 2.5 V for NPS, the limit for Na2.25Y0.25Zr0.75Cl6 is 3.8 V, much more promising for high-voltage Na ASSB applications. In addition, the reaction energies with the NaCrO2 cathode and with metallic Na were also computed; in each case, the values were found to be less negative than for NPS. This suggests that NYZC is a promising SSE candidate for its superior electrochemical and chemical stability when in contact with common electrode materials. In addition, the grand potential phase diagram of Na2.25Y0.25Zr0.75Cl6 was computed to evaluate the stability window and the reaction products at different voltages (
Experimentally, two test cells composed of a Na—Sn 2:1 alloy anode, a Na3PS4 electrolyte, and Na2.25Y0.25Zr0.75Cl6 mixed with carbon (acetylene black, or AB, in a 70:30 NYZC:AB ratio) cathode were fabricated to determine the lower and upper potential values at which the Na2.25Y0.25Zr0.75Cl6 SSE is stable; one cell was discharged to 0 V (
Given the results for the electrochemical window of Na2.25Y0.25Zr0.75Cl6, to electrochemically evaluate it in an ASSB, the following model system was used: Na—Sn alloy (2:1) for the anode, Na3PS4 for the electrolyte, and NaCrO2 for the cathode. NaCrO2 was chosen due to its operating voltage of 2-3.6 V, which is within the stability window of Na2.25Y0.25Zr0.75Cl6. The cathode was mixed into a composite cathode according to the Methods section.
In each case, the capacity retention and the observed CE values are very high, the CE values being the highest among all of those reported for Na ASSBs that use a NaCrO2 cathode. This is a result of negligible oxidative decomposition of Na2.25Y0.25Zr0.75Cl6 as well as its superior chemical stability against NaCrO2. It is important to note that NaCrO2 does not have any protective coating layer, eliminating an additional step in the ASSB fabrication process. The result is similar the one observed in the previously mentioned report of the lithium analog Li3YCl6. These cycling results highlight the superior stability obtained by adding Na2.25Y0.25Zr0.75Cl6 on the cathode side, further corroborating the computational findings.
To characterize any changes in Na2.25Y0.25Zr0.75Cl6 after cycling, ASSBs were disassembled to recover the composite cathodes and XPS measurements were conducted.
As described in the foregoing disclosure, Na3YCl6 was computationally and experimentally evaluated for its electrochemical properties and performance. Through aliovalent substitution of Y3+ by Zr4+, yielding Na3-xY1-xZrxCl6, it was found that the Na diffusivity drastically increased, reflected in the ionic conductivity increase by two orders of magnitude (for compositions with x<1). Furthermore, the electrochemical window, especially on the cathode side, was retained even with the incorporation of Zr, and the upper limit of 3.8 V proved to be significantly beneficial especially when using NaCrO2 as the cathode in a Na ASSB. Through electrochemical results and characterization techniques such as XPS, no significant degradation of NYZC was observed with prolonged cycling.
1. Bachman, J. C. et al. Inorganic Solid-State Electrolytes for Lithium Batteries: Mechanisms and Properties Governing Ion Conduction. Chem. Rev. 116, 140-162 (2016).
2. Lau, J. et al. Sulfide Solid Electrolytes for Lithium Battery Applications. Adv. Energy Mater. 8, 1800933 (2018).
3. Richards, W. D., Miara, L. J., Wang, Y., Kim, J. C. & Ceder, G. Interface Stability in Solid-State Batteries. Chem. Mater. 28, 266-273 (2016).
4. Tan, D. H. S. et al. Elucidating Reversible Electrochemical Redox of Li6PS5Cl Solid Electrolyte. ACS Energy Lett. 4, 2418-2427 (2019).
5. Banerjee, A. et al. Revealing Nanoscale Solid-Solid Interfacial Phenomena for Long-Life and High-Energy All-Solid-State Batteries. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 11, 43138-43145 (2019).
6. Tang, H. et al. Probing Solid-Solid Interfacial Reactions in All-Solid-State Sodium-Ion Batteries with First-Principles Calculations. Chem. Mater. 30, 163-173 (2018).
7. Asano, T. et al. Solid Halide Electrolytes with High Lithium-Ion Conductivity for Application in 4 V Class Bulk-Type All-Solid-State Batteries. Adv. Mater. 30, 1803075 (2018).
8. Li, X. et al. Air-stable Li 3 InCl 6 electrolyte with high voltage compatibility for all-solid-state batteries. Energy Environ. Sci. 12, 2665-2671 (2019).
9. Wang, Y. et al. Development of solid-state electrolytes for sodium-ion battery-A short review. Nano Mater. Sci. 1, 91-100 (2019).
10. Banerjee, A. et al. Na3SbS4: A Solution Processable Sodium Superionic Conductor for All-Solid-State Sodium-Ion Batteries. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 55, 9634-9638 (2016).
11. Nguyen, H. et al. Experimental and Computational Evaluation of a Sodium-Rich Anti-Perovskite for Solid State Electrolytes. J. Electrochem. Soc. 163, A2165-A2171 (2016).
12. Richards, W. D. et al. Design and synthesis of the superionic conductor Na10SnP2S12. Nat. Commun. 7, 1-8 (2016).
13. Park, K. H. et al. Solution-derived glass-ceramic NaI·Na3SbS4 superionic conductors for all-solid-state Na-ion batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A 6, 17192-17200 (2018).
14. Hayashi, A. et al. A sodium-ion sulfide solid electrolyte with unprecedented conductivity at room temperature. Nat. Commun. 10, 1-6 (2019).
15. Deng, Z., Wang, Z., Chu, I.-H., Luo, J. & Ong, S. P. Elastic Properties of Alkali Superionic Conductor Electrolytes from First Principles Calculations. J. Electrochem. Soc. 163, A67-A74 (2016).
16. Chu, I.-H. et al. Room-Temperature All-solid-state Rechargeable Sodium-ion Batteries with a Cl-doped Na 3 PS 4 Superionic Conductor. Sci. Rep. 6, 1-10 (2016).
17. Lacivita, V., et al.,. Ab initio investigation of the stability of electrolyte/electrode interfaces in all-solid-state Na batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A 7, 8144-8155 (2019).
18. Kresse, G. & Furthmüller, J. Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169-11186 (1996).
19. Blochl, P. E. Projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B 50, 17953-17979 (1994).
20. Perdew, J. P., et al., Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865-3868 (1996).
21. Ong, S. P. et al. Python Materials Genomics (pymatgen): A robust, open-source python library for materials analysis. Comput. Mater. Sci. 68, 314-319 (2013).
22. Deng, Z., et al., Data-Driven First-Principles Methods for the Study and Design of Alkali Superionic Conductors. Chem. Mater. 29, 281-288 (2017).
23. Jain, A. et al. Commentary: The Materials Project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation. APL Mater. 1, 011002 (2013).
24. Ong, S. P. et al. The Materials Application Programming Interface (API): A simple, flexible and efficient API for materials data based on REpresentational State Transfer (REST) principles. Comput. Mater. Sci. 97, 209-215 (2015).
25. Bergerhoff, G., et al., The inorganic crystal structure data base. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 23, 66-69 (1983).
26. Hautier, G., et al., Data Mined Ionic Substitutions for the Discovery of New Compounds. Inorg. Chem. 50, 656-663 (2011).
27. Jain, A. et al. A high-throughput infrastructure for density functional theory calculations. Comput. Mater. Sci. 50, 2295-2310 (2011).
28. Willems, T. F., et al., Algorithms and tools for high-throughput geometry-based analysis of crystalline porous materials. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 149, 134-141 (2012).
29. Jónsson, H., et al., Nudged Elastic Band Method for Finding Minimum Energy Paths of Transitions. in (1998). doi:10.1142/9789812839664_0016.
30. Shapeev, A. V., Moment Tensor Potentials: A Class of Systematically Improvable Interatomic Potentials. Multiscale Model. Simul. 14, 1153-1173 (2016).
31. Podryabinkin, E. V. & Shapeev, A. V. Active learning of linearly parametrized interatomic potentials. Comput. Mater. Sci. 140, 171-180 (2017).
32. Gubaev, K., et al., Accelerating high-throughput searches for new alloys with active learning of interatomic potentials. Comput. Mater. Sci. 156, 148-156 (2019).
33. Plimpton, S. Fast parallel algorithms for short-range molecular dynamics. https://www.osti.gov/biblio/10176421 (1993) doi:10.2172/10176421.
This application claims the benefit of the priority of U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/989,336, filed Mar. 13, 2020, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/US2021/022197 | 3/12/2021 | WO |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 62989336 | Mar 2020 | US |
