The invention relates generally to the field of electromagnetic propagation, and more particularly to antennas.
Antennas are used in a variety of applications for transmission and receipt of information via electromagnetic waves. The direction at which an antenna radiates or receives power can be optimized by the shape and structure of the antenna, as well as the method of driving it. In some applications, a highly directional antenna is desired, while in others an omnidirectional antenna is desired. In the transmission mode, an input signal connects to a feed on the antenna and drives a radiator. The electrical signal of the input is converted to electromagnetic radiation that propagates from the radiator in accordance with its directivity. The process basically works in reverse when an antenna is receiving a signal.
In addition, for maximum efficiency, the load presented by the antenna itself, or more specifically, by the radiator of the antenna, should be matched to the input impedance of the feed. This minimizes loss due to reflections and standing waves created by impedance mismatching.
Space considerations also play a role in antenna design. For example, an elongated antenna (such as a traditional dipole) may provide an ideal power distribution pattern for a given application; however, the device or product of which the antenna is a part, or the application in which the antenna is used, may not permit the use of a long, somewhat fragile antenna such as a traditional dipole.
For terrestrially based applications, in which the device receiving signals from or transmitting to an antenna is positioned away from the antenna at relatively small angle from horizontal, it is desirable that the antenna's power distribution be directed primarily outward (or horizontally), rather than vertically. A traditional dipole antenna provides such a radiation pattern but often proves too large or fragile for a given application. One use of antennas includes transmitting from a location located at or near ground level to receivers located on power or telephone poles, or buildings, which may be located in any direction from the antenna. In such locations, the size of the antenna is a key consideration, as well as the likelihood that the antenna will inevitably come into contact with persons or objects.
When a dipole, ring, yagi, or similar type antenna is fed with a coax connection, the coaxial cable may act as a radiator, in addition to the radiator of the antenna itself. To isolate the antenna radiator from the coax feed cable, and prevent coax cable from radiating, a choke balun may be added between the antenna and the feed line. This is prior art. These types of antennas, however, do not have a ground plane. Some circular antennas include a ground plane having concentric circular grooves formed in it, effectively leaving a series of concentric circular walls. In these devices, the choke is “above” the ground plane, with respect to the feed line.
For antennas with a radiator positioned over a ground plane, such as a patch antenna, prior art designs assume that that the ground plane isolates the radiator from the feed line (which is connected from below the ground plane), such that the feed line does not affect or interfere with the radiation pattern of the antenna. It has been discovered, however, that the ground plane does not provide adequate isolation and a coaxial feed cable can interfere with radiation patterns of antenna, even where the antenna radiator is separated from the coaxial cable by the ground plane.
Thus, there is a need for a relatively compact antenna that provides a substantially omnidirectional power distribution oriented primarily horizontally, rather than vertically. There is also a need for an antenna that is structurally resistant to bumps and knocks that may be experienced in a terrestrial installation. There is also a need for further isolating the radiation patterns of an antenna in which the radiator is separated from a feed, such as coaxial feed line, by a ground plane.
Embodiments of the present invention satisfy these needs. One embodiment is an antenna comprising an annular radiator, a ground plane, a feed located in the center of said radiator, a plurality of radial microstrips, each microstrip having an inner end and an outer end, each outer end coupled to the radiator, each inner end coupled to the ground plane, where each microstrip is coupled to the feed between its inner and outer ends. The antenna has a resonant frequency defining a wavelength, and, in one embodiment, the outer end of each of the plurality of microstrips is coupled to the radiator within about one-fourth wavelength of the outer end of an adjacent one of the microstrips. The radiator has a load impedance and the feed has an input impedance, and, in another embodiment of the antenna, the ratio of the input impedance to the load impedance is a function of the ratio of the length of each microstrip from its first end to the feed, to the length of each microstrip from its first end to its second end. Another embodiment of the invention comprises an antenna having a radiator over a ground plane fed by a coaxial feed, in which a cylindrical choke approximately one-quarter wavelength in length is placed around the feed and connected to the underside of the ground plane.
The present invention will be explained, by way of example only, with reference to certain embodiments and the attached Figures, in which:
As shown in
The outer ends 52 of the microstrips 50 are coupled to the radiator 20 at drive points 25. The microstrips 50 are coupled to the ground plane 30 at their inner end 54. The microstrips 50 are preferably coplanar with the radiator 20 through a substantial portion of their length, from the outer end 52 to a bend 53, where the microstrip turns downward across the gap 15 to meet the ground plane 30 at proximal end 54. As shown, the microstrips 50 may be tapered such that they become progressively narrower from the area near the coupling with the feed 40 to outer end 52. As discussed below, in a preferred embodiment, the number of microstrips is determined according to the dimensions of the radiator 20 and resonant wavelength of the antenna in order to drive the radiator 20 substantially in phase. In one embodiment, the radiator 20 and microstrips 50 are stamped from a single sheet of metal, and the bend 53 is formed simply by bending or crimping the microstrip 50 a distance from its inner end 54 that corresponds to the desired width of the gap 15 separating the ground plane 30 from the radiator 20.
The feed 40 is preferably a standard connector allowing coupling of the antenna 10 to a standard coaxial cable. That is, the feed 40 comprises a central conductor 42 carrying the input signal, which is coupled to the microstrips 50 at feed point 55, and an outer sheath of conductors 44 for the return signal path coupled to the ground plane 30. The central and outer conductors are separated by an insulator and constructed as is known by those of ordinary skill in the art. While the feed 40 is shown as being a standard coaxial feed, any other connector suitable for carrying a signal from an input source to the antenna 10 may be used, including hard wired connections directly to the feed point 40 and ground plane 30.
As with any antenna, the antenna 10 according to embodiments of the present invention has a resonant frequency fr that is a function of the materials and structure of the device. Certain dimensions of antennas are often expressed in terms of wavelength λ at the resonant frequency; for example, a quarter-wave dipole antenna refers to a dipole antenna with a length that is one-fourth as long as the wavelength λ of the signal propagated at the resonant frequency fr. In a preferred embodiment, the length of each microstrip (from the inner end 54 to the bend 53 to the feed point 55, and on to the outer end 52) is approximately ¼ λ. The design of the antenna 10 allows for the microstrips 50 to extend through the feed point 55 at the center of the radiator 20 and then down to the ground plane 20. As a result, the distance from feed point 55 (at the center of the radiator 20, in a preferred embodiment) to the outer end 52 of the microstrip is less than ¼ λ, and thus the radiator has a radius less than ¼ λ while achieving the performance of a full ¼λ antenna. The size of the antenna is effectively reduced by the length of that portion of the microstrips 50 from the feed point 55 to the bend 53. Satisfactory performance characteristics are achieved with the gap 15 between the ground plane 30 and the radiator 20 being approximately 1/10 λ. Embodiments of the present invention provide the performance of a half-wave dipole at one-fifth the height.
According to one embodiment of the present invention, the placement of the feed point 55 relative to the length of microstrips 50 allows a lower input impedance of the feed 40 to be leveraged to match a higher load impedance of the radiator 20. Specifically, the ratio of the length of the microstrip 50 (from outer end 52 to the bend 53 and down to inner end 54, defined as L1) to the distance from inner end 54 up to the bend 53 and to feed point 55 (defined as L2) is directly proportional to the ratio of the load impedance of the radiator 20 (RL) to the input impedance at the feed point (RI):
Thus, if the feed point 55 is placed 1/10 of the length L1 from the inner end 54, then a 10Ω input impedance at feed 40 will be leveraged to match the impedance of a radiator 20 having a 100Ω load impedance. If, using a more typical example, the radiator has a load impedance of 250Ω and the input impedance is 50Ω (typical of co-ax connection), then the ratio of L1 to L2 should be 5:1. The tapering of the microstrips 50, discussed above, aids in matching the impedance of the feed 40 to the radiator 20.
As shown in
With the entirety of the radiator driven substantially in phase, an electromagnetic signal propagates uniformly from the radiator, with its power oriented primarily radially, rather than axially, with respect to the radiator, as shown in
Embodiments of the present invention therefore find application in antennas in which size and footprint are important, and in which the targeted receivers of the antenna's signal are displaced substantially horizontally, rather than vertically, from the antenna. The antenna is flat (about 1/10 λ thick) and less than ½ λ in diameter. One exemplary application is its use as a pit antenna in an automated water metering system. Water meters are often located in a small depression, or pit, in the yard of the premises. The meter may be equipped with a meter interface unit (MIU) that automatically records the meter readings and transmits them to a collecting device located on a telephone or power pole in the vicinity. One such collector may service thousands of MIUs. Because the MIUs are located at or near ground level, and the collector is located at a relatively low angle Φ relative to horizontal from the MIUs, and antenna having the power distribution characteristics of antenna 10, as shown in
In a preferred embodiment, the antenna 10 was designed to resonate at 460 Mhz. Four microstrips 50 were used, as shown in
Another embodiment of the present invention comprises a cylindrical choke approximately one-quarter wavelength in length, placed under the ground plane of an antenna having a radiator over a ground plane.
A quarter-wavelength choke of this embodiment of the present invention may be used with any antenna having a radiator over a ground plane, fed by a coax feed line, including the antenna 10 of
Although the present invention has been described and shown with reference to certain preferred embodiments thereof, other embodiments are possible. The foregoing description is therefore considered in all respects to be illustrative and not restrictive. Therefore, the present invention should be defined with reference to the claims and their equivalents, and the spirit and scope of the claims should not be limited to the description of the preferred embodiments contained herein.
This application is a continuation under 35 U.S.C. §120 of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/842,674, and claims priority thereto and the benefit thereof.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4382260 | Ranghelli | May 1983 | A |
4414550 | Tresselt | Nov 1983 | A |
4509056 | Ploussios | Apr 1985 | A |
4511900 | Deasy | Apr 1985 | A |
4525720 | Corzine | Jun 1985 | A |
4825222 | Butcher | Apr 1989 | A |
4987421 | Sunahara | Jan 1991 | A |
5099249 | Seavey | Mar 1992 | A |
5440317 | Jalloul | Aug 1995 | A |
5621422 | Wang | Apr 1997 | A |
5652598 | Campbell et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
6040805 | Huynh et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6054953 | Lindmark | Apr 2000 | A |
6133878 | Lee | Oct 2000 | A |
6377226 | Ha | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6414605 | Walden et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6597316 | Rao | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6812902 | Rossman | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6836247 | Soutiaguine et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6876327 | Collins | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6956529 | Chen | Oct 2005 | B1 |
7170463 | Seavey | Jan 2007 | B1 |
7190310 | Masutani | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7511669 | Maeda | Mar 2009 | B2 |
8193989 | Fujita | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8743005 | Stuart | Jun 2014 | B2 |
20080024382 | Uddin et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080158066 | Yu | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20100085264 | Du | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100315293 | Lehtola et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110115676 | Tatarnikov et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20130278473 | Bowers | Oct 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
101127415 | Feb 2008 | CN |
490760 | Jun 1992 | EP |
2000077930 | Mar 2000 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13842674 | Mar 2013 | US |
Child | 14600950 | US |