The invention relates generally to gradient mobile phase liquid chromatography. More particularly, the invention relates to a method and a device for enhancing the peak capacity of a liquid chromatography system.
In liquid chromatography, a sample containing a number of components to be separated is injected into a system flow and directed through a chromatographic column. The column separates the mixture by differential retention into its individual components. The components elute from the column as distinct bands separated in time.
A typical liquid chromatography system includes a pump for delivering a fluid (the “mobile phase”) at a controlled flow rate and composition, an injector to introduce a sample solution into the flowing mobile phase, a chromatographic column that contains a packing material or sorbent (the “stationary phase”), and a detector to detect the presence and amount of the sample components in the mobile phase leaving the column. When the mobile phase passes through the stationary phase, each component of the sample typically emerges from the column at a different time because different components in the sample typically have different affinities for the packing material. The presence of a particular component in the mobile phase exiting the column can be detected by measuring changes in a physical or chemical property of the eluent. By plotting the detector signal as a function of time, response “peaks” corresponding to the presence and quantities of the components of the sample can be observed.
Small quantities of a component exiting the column can be difficult to detect, especially if the width of the peak is significant relative to the amplitude of the peak. Moreover, peaks that occur closely in time can be difficult to detect, especially when there is no baseline separation between the peaks.
In one aspect, a chromatographic separation device includes a first chromatographic separation module and a second chromatographic separation module. The first chromatographic separation module comprises a first chromatographic sorbent having a first retentivity, a first length and a first chromatographic dispersion. The second chromatographic separation module is configured in serial communication with the first chromatographic separation module to receive a gradient mobile phase. The second chromatographic separation module comprises a chromatographic sorbent having a second retentivity that is greater than the first retentivity, a second length that is shorter than the first length, and a second chromatographic dispersion that is less than the first chromatographic dispersion. A width of a chromatographic peak in the gradient mobile phase eluted from the first chromatographic separation module is greater than the width of the chromatographic peak in the gradient mobile phase eluted from the second chromatographic separation module
In another aspect, a method for performing a chromatographic separation includes providing a flow of a gradient mobile phase through a first chromatographic separation module having a first retentivity, a first length and a first chromatographic dispersion. The method also includes providing a flow of the gradient mobile phase eluted from the first chromatographic separation module to a second chromatographic separation module having a second retentivity that is greater than the first retentivity, a second length that is shorter than the first length, and a second chromatographic dispersion that is less than the first chromatographic dispersion. A width of a chromatographic peak in the gradient mobile phase eluted from the first chromatographic separation module is greater than a width of the chromatographic peak in the gradient mobile phase eluted from the second chromatographic separation module.
The above and further advantages of this invention may be better understood by referring to the following description in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which like reference numerals indicate like elements and features in the various figures. For clarity, not every element may be labeled in every figure. The drawings are not necessarily to scale, emphasis instead being placed upon illustrating the principles of the invention.
Reference in the specification to “one embodiment” or “an embodiment” means that a particular, feature, structure or characteristic described in connection with the embodiment is included in at least one embodiment of the teaching. References to a particular embodiment within the specification do not necessarily all refer to the same embodiment.
The goal of chromatography is to separate different compounds from one another and elute them from chromatographic device in narrow peaks or “zones.” This is often accomplished using a gradient mobile phase in which the composition of the mobile phase changes with time. Two opposing effects are present for an injected zone in a gradient mobile phase. One effect is dispersion which causes the width of the zone traveling through a column to increase due to the inhomogeneity of the packed bed, molecular diffusion, and mass transfer resistance in the interacting mobile and stationary phases. The result is peak broadening which is more pronounced in long columns packed with large sorbent particles. The opposing effect is zone focusing, or peak compression, which occurs as a result of the gradient elution process. The peak compression effect is typically minor, especially for small molecules. Compression is generally not utilized to reduce peak widths, with the exception of step gradients in which a sample is focused on a head of a column using a weak mobile phase in conventional, capillary or nano-scale liquid chromatography, or for peak focusing in a second dimension column during two-dimensional gas chromatography or liquid chromatography.
An analyte zone has a physical width on the chromatographic column. Consequently, the sample molecules in the later (“rear”) portion of the zone are exposed to a slightly stronger solvent for elution then the sample molecules in the earlier (“front”) portion of the zone. As a result, the sample molecules in the rear portion are less retained than those in the front portion. The difference in the mobile phase composition between the front and rear portions is typically small. For example, the composition difference can be less than 0.01% to more than 1%. This small difference results in a peak compression of approximately 8% for small molecules (e.g., molecular weight less than 500 g/mol or 1,000 g/mol). In contrast, approximately 10% to 30% peak width compression should be achievable for peptides and large biopolymers such as proteins and nucleic acids.
If the physical limitation of column dispersion is eliminated, the width of each zone would reduce to zero; however, dispersion is always present and the peaks have finite widths determined, in part, by sorbent particle size and the gradient slope.
In brief overview, the invention relates to a chromatographic separation device and a method for performing a chromatographic separation. The chromatographic separation device includes two chromatographic separation modules configured in serial communication. The first chromatographic separation module is adapted to receive a gradient mobile phase that includes a sample for separation. The second chromatographic separation module receives the gradient mobile phase that exits from the first chromatographic separation module. The first and second chromatographic separation modules include chromatographic sorbents that differ in one or more of composition, particle size and sorbent temperature. The retentivity of the second chromatographic separation module is greater than the retentivity of the first chromatographic separation module and the chromatographic dispersion of the second chromatographic separation module is less than the chromatographic dispersion of the first chromatographic separation module. A width of a chromatographic peak in the gradient mobile phase eluted from the first chromatographic separation module is greater than a width of the same chromatographic peak after elution from the second chromatographic separation module. Thus the peak capacity of the chromatographic separation device is greater than the peak capacity of the first chromatographic separation module.
Advantageously, the device achieves improved chromatographic resolution in liquid chromatography systems and microfluidic liquid chromatography systems. For well focusing molecules such as peptides and biopolymers of large molecular weight, the device has high peak capacity without the need to pack a full column length with small sorbent particles. Thus the device can operate at lower pressure and with reduced frictional heating compared to conventional chromatographic columns and ultra performance liquid chromatography (UPLC®) columns.
The present teaching will now be described in more detail with reference to embodiments thereof as shown in the accompanying drawings. While the present teaching is described in conjunction with various embodiments and examples, it is not intended that the present teaching be limited to such embodiments. On the contrary, the present teaching encompasses various alternatives, modifications and equivalents, as will be appreciated by those of skill in the art. Those of ordinary skill having access to the teaching herein will recognize additional implementations, modifications and embodiments, as well as other fields of use, which are within the scope of the present disclosure as described herein.
If both separation modules 12 and 14 include sorbents having the same particle size, the same dispersion results and no substantial peak focusing occurs. In contrast, if the second separation module 14 is packed with a sorbent formed of smaller particles than the particles in the first separation module 12, band compression is achieved and a narrow peak is eluted. The peak width of the analyte zone eluted from the second separation module 14 is determined by the smaller particle size. Further, the length L2 of the second separation module 14 can be short, while a first separation module 12 of greater length L1 and having the larger sorbent particles determines the separation selectivity and resolution. When focusing is efficient, peak widths can be achieved that are similar to that of a single separation module having smaller sorbent particles with a combined lengths L1+L2 of the two modules 12 and 14. The smaller length L2 of the second separation module 14 avoids the use of a higher pressure which would be otherwise required if both separation modules 12 and 14 were formed with the sorbent having the smaller particle size.
As illustrated in
Differential temperature control of the chromatographic separation modules 12 and 14 can be used to achieve a difference in retentivity of the two separation modules 12 and 14. This differential temperature control can be used as the sole means to achieve differential retentivity.
In an alternative embodiment as shown in
An evaluation of techniques described above was performed using a 100 mm long, 2.1 mm diameter XBridge™ C8 5 μm column (available from Waters Corporation of Milford, Mass.) for the first chromatographic separation module and a 30 mm long, 2.1 diameter column packed with a more retentive HSS T3 1.8 μm sorbent for the second chromatographic separation module. A mobile phase gradient of 10% acetonitrile per minute was used and the peak widths at 13.4% of peak height were determined.
The bar graph display of
A comparison of
The evaluation measurement data confirm that peak capacity can be improved by using a chromatographic column having a larger particle size sorbent coupled to a shorter and more retentive chromatographic column packed with smaller particle size sorbent.
Configurations different from those described above for the evaluations can be used. For example, the first column can be packed with a sorbent having a particle size in a range of approximately 5 μm to approximately 10 μm and the second, shorter column packed with a substantially smaller sorbent that, for example, may have a particle size that is less than 0.5 μm to 1.8 μm or more. With a particle size of approximately 0.5 μm to approximately 1.5 μm for the second column, the total system pressure is within the operating range of current liquid chromatography pumps. The resulting peak capacity can be as large as a longer column packed with 0.5 μm to 1.5 μm particle size sorbent which would not be suitable for current liquid chromatography systems due to requirement for a much higher system pressure.
The evaluation results demonstrate that a temperature step gradient, achieved by maintaining different column temperatures, can be used independently or in combination with columns of different sized sorbent particles. Similarly, mobile phase dilution between the two columns can be used independently, or in combination with one or both of these two techniques.
The various embodiments described above can be adapted for use in microfluidic liquid chromatography systems. For example, the turns in a microfluidic chromatographic column can generate excessive band broadening. Implementing the embodiments described above for a microfluidic structure allows for improved performance by achieving peak compression prior to band elution. Embodiments described above can also be used to compress wide zones created by injection of large sample volumes.
While the invention has been shown and described with reference to specific embodiments, it should be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes in form and detail may be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as recited in the accompanying claims.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US15/58303 | 10/30/2015 | WO | 00 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62082774 | Nov 2014 | US |