This application is a U.S. national stage entry under 35 U.S.C. § 371 of International Application No. PCT/162014/001960, filed Sep. 30, 2014, which claims priority to Application No. EP 13186724.4 filed on Sep. 30, 2013. The entire content of each of these applications is hereby incorporated herein by reference.
The present invention is related to a process of tanning hide to obtain leather. More specifically, it refers to an improvement introduced in the conventional process of tanning hide with chrome to obtain better quality leather. The advantages of the present invention are obtained with an additional acidification step after the chromium tanning step.
Hide tanning is a process in which the collagen protein present therein reacts with tanning agents, originating leather—the tanning process is therefore one of the essential steps in leather production process. It is a very old process, whose purpose is to avoid hide degradation and putrefaction, by means of a protein crosslinking phenomenon caused by the action of the employed tanning agent.
For chrome tanning producing “Wet Blue” (an intermediary stage prior to obtaining the final leather), traditionally used tanning agents are chrome III salts, such as chrome sulfate or basic chrome sulfate. Typically, leather has already been tanned when the hide incorporates about 3.5% by weight of chrome oxide, Cr203, dry basis, thus obtaining retraction test resistant leathers.
In the traditional processes of tanning hide, only 70% to 80% of chrome oxide available in the tanning bath is used. This means that the use of a large excess of salt is required, imposing additional costs to the process and generating an undesirable residue, potentially causing damaging impact to the environment and requiring storage and/or chemical treatment before disposal.
Despite the fact that chrome III compounds are not damaging to plants and animals, especially under neutral conditions, international rules impose low limits to the presence of chrome III and other heavy metals in water and air.
American patents U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,715,861 and 4,978,361 describe better hide absorption of chrome by hide by means of supplementary addition of chemical compounds. American patent U.S. Pat. No. 4,042,321 proposes recycling the tanning bath by a complex and costly process aiming the reduction of effluents treatment, being, however, complicated due to the accumulation of salts and fiber residues. European patents EP 822,263 and Brazilian patents BR 9603419-0 and BR 9702025-7 disclose larger exhaustion of the chrome bath by the use of aldehyde, which is very toxic. As a rule, the state of the art always proposes more steps and/or the use of more raw materials to deal with the problem.
The traditional Chromium process from the animal hide to the final leather comprises the following step:
The inventor has now found that a re-acidification of the bath after the tanning step, with particular organic acids can improve the up-taking of re-tanning products (at step 7) and improve the mechanical properties of the crust and finished leather.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,938,779 discloses a Chrome tanning process of hides. After tanning step 4), a preliminary neutralization is performed by the addition of a mixture containing glyoxylic acid and MgO. A pH 3.9 is obtained after this addition. A basification step is then performed with alkali aluminum silicate. A pH 4.5 is then obtained. In this process, the neutralization begins when the Chrome has not yet completely crossed the hide cross-section.
The object of the present invention is a process of tanning hides comprising:
This re-acidification step lasts for a time sufficient to enable all the Chrome to cross the hide cross-section. The basification step only begins after all the Chrome has crossed the hide cross-section.
Advantageous characteristics of the process can be found in the sub-claims and below.
In one preferred embodiment of the process according to the invention, the organic acids used in the re-acidification step comprise:
In another preferred embodiment of the process according to the invention, the organic acids used in the re-acidification step comprise a mixture of adipic, glutaric and succinic acid.
In this case, the organic acids composition used in the re-acidification step advantageously comprise:
In the process according to the invention, the amount of organic acids used in the re-acidification step is preferably comprised between 0.25% and 10% of the weight of the hide to be treated, more preferably between 0.5% and 5% of the weight of the hide to be treated and in particular between 0.7% and 3% of the weight of the hide to be treated.
It is particularly preferred that the pH obtained after the re-acidification step is comprised between 2.6 and 3.5, preferably between 2.6 and 3.
In the process according to the invention, the basifying step c) is preferably performed after the chrome has crossed the hide cross-section.
The re-acidification step is advantageously performed during a time comprised between 10 and 25 hours, in order to enable the chrome to cross the hide cross-section.
The pH obtained after the basifying step c) is preferably comprised between 3.6 and 4.2.
In the process according to the invention, the bath of the pickling step a) comprises, with regards to the weight of the hides to be treated:
100 kg of hide for which liming, unhairing and fleshing process are completed, is washed, in a tanning drum with the same weight of water for 10 minutes.
For all examples, all ingredients added thereafter are in weight pourcentage of the initial hide weight.
After the washing the water is discharged and the hides are submitted to deliming and bating with the use of ammonium sulfate and a commercial deliming agent based on di-carboxylic acids (Ex: Rhodiaeco Descal SD commercialized by Rhodia Poliamida e Especialidades Ltda.). After all, bating process takes place, adding 0.08% of a standard commercial proteolytic enzyme and the drum is run for 1 hour (pH=8.0). At the end of these operations the cross-section of the hide does not show a pink color with phenolphthalein indicator.
The hides are washed twice with 100% water, based on hide weight, and the washings are discharged.
With relation to the hide weight, it is added into the drum, 50% of water, 6% of sodium chloride (Bé (Baumé scale) 6 to 7) and 0.4% of a commercial bleaching (run 15 minutes). 0.6% of 85% formic acid diluted in water (1 to 10) is added (run 30 minutes) followed by the addition of 0.3% of sulfuric acid diluted in water (1 to 15) (run 15 minutes), 0.3% of sulfuric acid diluted in water (1 to 15) (run 15 minutes) followed by the addition of 0.4% of sulfuric acid diluted in water (1 to 15) and the drum is run for an additional 3 hours. After this time the pH of the bath is around 2 to 3.
At this point a 3% of commercial chromium sulphate salt (ex: basic chromium sulphate, which presents 33% alkalinity and 25 to 26% chrome III oxide) is added (run 30 minutes). A second addition of 3% of chromium sulphate salt is added and the drum is run for additional 30 minutes followed by the addition of 0.75% of a mixture of 2-methyl glutaric acid (MGA), 2-ethyl succinic acid (ESA) and adipic acid (AA). A pH of 2.6 to 2.8 is then obtained. After 17 hours, the chromium has completely crossed the hide cross-section.
After this time, 20% of water is added and 0.35% of a commercial basifying agent (ex: magnesium oxide) (run 90 minutes). A second portion of 0.23% of magnesium oxide is added and the drum is run for an additional 90 minutes. A pH of 3.6 to 4 is then obtained. The water bath is heated from 35° C. to 50° C. during 5 hours, the drum is drained, the wet blue is washed with 100% water (based on pelt weight), drained and washed again with 80% water.
The obtained Wet Blue was submitted to the analysis of total chromium content, chromium in layers and evaluation by Scanning Electron Microscope (EDS) (Table 1 and
500 kg of hide for which liming, unhairing and fleshing process are completed, is washed in a tanning drum with 100% water (based on pelt weight) for 10 minutes. After that, the hides were submitted to deliming and batting according to example 1.
With relation to the hide weight, it is added into the drum, 50% of water, 6% of sodium chloride (Bé 6 to 7) and 0.4% of a commercial bleaching (run 15 minutes). 0.6% of 85% formic acid diluted in water (1 to 10) is added (run 30 minutes) followed by the addition of 0.3% of sulfuric acid diluted in water (1 to 15) (run 15 minutes), 0.3% of sulfuric acid diluted in water (1 to 15) (run 15 minutes) followed by the addition of 0.4% of sulfuric acid diluted in water (1 to 15) and the drum is run for an additional 3 hours. After this time the pH of the bath is around 2 to 3.
At this point a 3% of commercial chromium sulphate salt (ex: basic chromium sulphate, which presents 33% alkalinity and 25 to 26% chrome III oxide) is added (run 30 minutes). A second addition of 3% of chromium sulphate salt is added and the drum is run for additional 30 minutes followed by the addition of 2.5% of an aqueous solution of a mixture of 2-methyl glutaric acid (MGA), 2-ethyl succinic acid (ESA) and adipic acid (AA). A pH of 2.6 to 2.8 is then obtained. After 17 hours, the chromium has completely crossed the hide cross-section.
After this time, 20% of water is added and 0.35% of a commercial basifying agent (ex: magnesium oxide) (run 90 minutes). A second portion of 0.23% of magnesium oxide is added and the drum is run for an additional 90 minutes. The water bath is heated from 35° C. to 50° C. during 5 hours, the drum is drained, the wet blue is washed with 100% water (based on pelt weight), drained and washed again with 80% water.
100 kg of hide for which liming, unhairing and fleshing process are completed, is washed in the tanning drum with 100% water (based on pelt weight) for 10 minutes. After that, the hides were submitted to deliming and batting according to example 1.
With relation to the hide weight, 60% of water, 6% of sodium chloride (Bé 6 to 7) and 0.4% of a commercial bleaching are added and the drum is run for 15 minutes. 0.6% of 85% formic acid diluted in water (1 to 10) is added (run 30 minutes) followed by the addition of 0.3% of sulfuric acid diluted in water (1 to 15) (run 15 minutes), 0.3% of sulfuric acid diluted in water (1 to 15) (run 15 minutes), followed by the addition of 0.4% of sulfuric acid diluted in water (1 to 15) and the drum is run for an additional 3 hours. After this time the pH of the bath is around 2.7 to 3.
At this point a 3% of commercial chromium sulphate salt (ex: basic chromium sulphate, which presents 33% alkalinity and 25 to 26% chrome III oxide) is added (run 30 minutes). A second addition of 3% of chromium sulphate salt is added and the drum is run for an additional 17 hours after which time the chromium has completely crossed the hide cross-section.
After this time, 20% of water is added and 0.35% of a commercial basifying agent (ex: magnesium oxide) (run 90 minutes). A second portion of 0.27% of magnesium oxide is added and the drum is run for an additional 90 minutes. The water bath is heated from 35° C. to 50° C. during 5 hours, the drum is drained, the wet blue is washed with 100% water (based on pelt weight), drained and washed again with 80% water.
The obtained Wet Blue was submitted to the analysis of the total chromium content, chromium in layers and evaluation by Scanning Electron Microscope (EDS) (Table 1 and
The Wet Blue obtained in the examples 1 and 3 are identified by different marks, combined and submitted to a standard re-tanning process. The Wet Blue hides are placed in the drum, and washed with 200% of water at 30° C. (based on Wet Blue weight) for 30 minutes and the washing is drained.
150% of water, 2% of sodium formiate and 0.3% of sodium bicarbonate are added and the drum is run for 60 minutes after which time the water bath shows a pH=4.4.
The water bath is drained and 60% of water at 30° C., 2% of a commercial polyacrylate (powder) are added and the drum is run for 60 minutes and the water bath is drained.
150% of water at 60° C., 2% of commercial sulfited synthetic oil, 2% of commercial sulfated emulsified vegetal oil are added, the drum is run for 45 minutes and the water bath is drained.
0.3% of 85% formic acid diluted in water (1 to 5) is added (run 20 minutes), the water bath is drained and the re-tanned hides are washed.
The re-tanned hides are left standing for 12 hours, stretched, naturally dried and softened.
The properties of the re-tanned hides are evaluated and compared concerning tensile strength, breaking strength, tear strength, progressive tensile strength, up-taking of re-tanning products based on a square foot weight of crust, light fastness, color appearance and comparative evaluation by Scanning Electron Microscope (EDS) (Tables 2 to 4 and
250 kg of hide for which liming, unhairing and fleshing process are completed, is washed in the tanning drum with 100% of water (based on pelt weight) for 10 minutes. After that, the hides are submitted to deliming and batting according to example 1.
With relation to the hide weight, 50% of water, 6% of sodium chloride (Bé 6 to 7) and 0.4% of a commercial bleaching are added and the drum is run for 15 minutes. 0.6% of 85% formic acid diluted in water (1 to 10) is added (run for 30 minutes) followed by the addition of 0.3% of sulfuric acid diluted in water (1 to 15) (run 15 minutes), 0.3% of sulfuric acid diluted in water (1 to 15) (run 15 minutes) followed by the addition 0.4% of sulfuric acid diluted in water (1 to 15) and the drum is run for 3 hours. After this time the pH of the bath is around 2 to 3.
At this point a 3% of commercial chromium sulphate salt (ex: basic chromium sulphate, which presents 33% alkalinity and 25 to 26% chrome III oxide) is added (run 30 minutes. A second addition of 3% of chromium sulphate salt is added (run 30 minutes) followed by the addition of 0.70% of Dioro (commercial product from Rhodia Poliamida e Especialidades Ltda. based on a mixture of di-carboxylic acids) and the drum is run for an additional 12 hours after which time the chromium has completely crossed the hide cross-section.
After this time, 20% of water is added and 0.35% of a commercial basifying agent (ex: magnesium oxide) (run 90 minutes). A second portion of 0.35% of magnesium oxide is added and the drum is run for an additional 90 minutes. The water bath is heated from 35° C. to 50° C. during 5 hours, the drum is drained, the wet blue is washed with 100% of water (based on pelt weight), drained and washed again with 80% of water.
The obtained Wet Blue was submitted to the analysis of the total chromium content and chromium in layers (Table 1).
250 kg of hide for which liming, unhairing and fleshing process are completed, is washed in a tanning drum with 100% of water (based on pelt weight) for 10 minutes. After that, the hides are submitted to deliming and batting according to example 1.
With relation to the hide weight, 50% of water, 6% of sodium chloride (Bé 6 to 7) and 0.4% of a commercial bleaching are added and the drum is run for 15 minutes. 0.6% of 85% formic acid diluted in water (1 to 10) is added (run 30 minutes) followed by the addition of 0.3% of sulfuric acid diluted in water (1 to 15) (run 15 minutes), 0.3% of sulfuric acid diluted in water (1 to 15) (run 15 minutes), followed by the addition of 0.4% sulfuric acid diluted in water (1 to 15) and the drum is run for an additional 3 hours. After this time the pH of the bath is around 2.7 to 3.
At this point a 3% of commercial chromium sulphate salt (ex: basic chromium sulphate, which presents 33% alkalinity and 25 to 26% chrome III oxide) is added (run 30 minutes). A second addition of 3% of chromium sulphate salt is added and the drum rum for an additional 12 hours after which time the chromium has completely crossed the hide cross-section.
After this time, 20% of water is added and 0.35% of a commercial basifying agent (ex: magnesium oxide) (run 90 minutes). A second portion of 0.35% magnesium oxide is added and the drum is run for an additional 90 minutes. The water bath is heated from 35° C. to 50° C. during 5 hours, the drum is drained, the wet blue is washed with 100% of water (based on pelt weight), drained and washed again with 80% of water.
The Wet Blue obtained in the examples 5 and 6 are identified, combined and submitted to a standard re-tanning process according to example 4.
The properties of the re-tanned hides are evaluated and compared concerning tensile strength, breaking strength, tear strength, progressive tensile strength, up-taking of re-tanning products based on a square foot weight of crust, light fastness and color appearance (Tables 2 to 4).
After the test the specimens were kept at least 1 hour in the dark in a conditioned environment at 23+/−2° C. and air relative humidity of 50+/−5%.
The above results show the improvement brought with the present invention with regards to the up-taking of retanning products as well as the gain in mass of crust. The invention also enables better physical-mechanical properties of crust and final leather.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
13186724 | Sep 2013 | EP | regional |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/IB2014/001960 | 9/30/2014 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2015/044766 | 4/2/2015 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2693996 | Von Fuchs | Nov 1954 | A |
3996292 | Decor | Dec 1976 | A |
4042321 | Backer et al. | Aug 1977 | A |
4101271 | Bockelman | Jul 1978 | A |
4187074 | Traubel | Feb 1980 | A |
4715861 | Lotz et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
4938779 | Friese | Jul 1990 | A |
4978361 | Fuchs et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
5500020 | Bandino | Mar 1996 | A |
5885302 | Leuck | Mar 1999 | A |
20050268671 | Lourenco | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20090172890 | Huffer | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20100076124 | Yawata | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100119775 | Bustos | May 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
9603419-0 | Jun 1998 | BR |
9702025-7 | Jun 1998 | BR |
102517407 | Jun 2012 | CN |
102776300 | Nov 2012 | CN |
822263 | Oct 1999 | EP |
WO 9606878 | Mar 1996 | WO |
20040015148 | Feb 2004 | WO |
WO 2004015148 | Feb 2004 | WO |
Entry |
---|
First Office Action dated Feb. 27, 2017, issued by The State Intellectual Property Office of The Peoples Republic of China (SIPO) in corresponding Chinese Patent Application No. CN-201480054100.0, with USPTO Global Dossier English translation (12 pages). |
Second Office Action dated Oct. 31, 2017, issued by the State Intellectual Property Office of the Peoples Republic of China (SIPO) in corresponding Chinese Patent Application No. CN-201480054100.0, with USPTO Global Dossier English translation (10 pages). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160244853 A1 | Aug 2016 | US |