Cigarette package coding system and associated method

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 8831764
  • Patent Number
    8,831,764
  • Date Filed
    Monday, October 17, 2011
    12 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, September 9, 2014
    9 years ago
Abstract
A package coding system for a cigarette manufacturing process is provided. An imprinting device imprints an alphanumeric code on each of a series of cigarette packages. A conveyor device conveys the cigarette packages in a feed direction. An inspection device is operably engaged with the conveyor device and inspects the alphanumeric code imprinted on each cigarette package conveyed by the conveyor device to determine whether any of the cigarette packages includes a defect in the imprinted alphanumeric code, and thus comprises a defective cigarette package. A removal device is operably engaged with the conveyor device and is configured to be in communication with the inspection device. The removal device is configured to remove the defective cigarette package from the series of cigarette packages conveyed by the conveyor device in response to identification thereof by the inspection device. An associated method is also provided.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE DISCLOSURE

1. Field of the Disclosure


Aspects of the present disclosure relate to a cigarette manufacturing process and, more particularly, to a cigarette package coding system and associated method.


2. Description of Related Art


Many mass-produced products are required to incorporate various coding schemes, for example, for regulatory purposes or for commercial tracking. Often, such coding must be marked directly on the product and/or on the package containing the product, and the accuracy and repeatability of the application of such coding is generally of high importance in forming a commercializable product. That is, if the coding is not applied in a particular manner, the product may be deemed to be “defective” and not suitable for sale. Accordingly, in a high speed manufacturing process, the application of the coding to the products/packages must be accomplished in an accurate and repeatable manner, and desirably at a high throughput speed.


However, such printing of the code on the product(s) in a high speed manufacturing process may be at risk of, for example, low print quality, uneven printing, misalignment of the code, a substantive error in the code (i.e., the wrong code), or other condition(s) deemed to comprise a defect. In such instances, it may be critical for such defects to be detected, wherein such defects may desirably be both qualitative as well as substantive, and for the product with the defectively-printed code to be removed from the manufacturing process, as soon as possible after the code is printed on the product, before the defective product can be further processed. It may also be desirable for the defective product to be removed from the manufacturing process without disturbing or affecting other non-defective products, and for the process to compensate or adjust for the absence of the defective product, once removed. It may also be desirable to have the capability of analyzing the defects, as well as patterns or trends in the defects, detected during the manufacturing process so as to, for example, allow root causes and remedial action to be determined, or to halt the process before too many defective products are produced. It may also be desirable for such a system and method to be installed in new manufacturing processes, or retrofitted into existing manufacturing processes, in a relatively simple and straightforward arrangement and configuration.


SUMMARY OF THE DISCLOSURE

The above and other needs are addressed by aspects of the present disclosure which, according to one particular aspect, provides a package coding system implemented in a cigarette manufacturing process. Such a system comprises an imprinting device configured to imprint an alphanumeric code on each of a series of cigarette packages. A conveyor device is configured to convey the cigarette packages in a feed direction. An inspection device is operably engaged with the conveyor device, and is configured to inspect the alphanumeric code imprinted on each cigarette package conveyed by the conveyor device to determine whether any of the cigarette packages includes a defect in the imprinted alphanumeric code, wherein any of the cigarette packages including the defect comprises a defective cigarette package. A removal device is operably engaged with the conveyor device and is configured to be in communication with the inspection device. The removal device is further configured to remove the defective cigarette package from the series of cigarette packages conveyed by the conveyor device in response to identification thereof by the inspection device, in some instances, without interacting with the cigarette packages preceding and subsequent to the defective cigarette package in the series of cigarette packages.


Another aspect of the present disclosure is directed to a method of verifying package coding in a cigarette manufacturing process. Such a method comprises imprinting an alphanumeric code on each of a series of cigarette packages, using an imprinting device, and conveying the cigarette packages in a feed direction using a conveyor device. The alphanumeric code imprinted on each cigarette package conveyed by the conveyor device is then inspected, using an inspection device operably engaged therewith, to determine whether any of the cigarette packages includes a defect in the imprinted alphanumeric code, wherein any of the cigarette packages including the defect comprises a defective cigarette package. The defective cigarette package is then removed from the series of cigarette packages conveyed by the conveyor device, using a removal device operably engaged with the conveyor device and configured to be in communication with the inspection device, in response to identification thereof by the inspection device, in some instances, without interacting with the cigarette packages preceding and subsequent to the defective cigarette package in the series of cigarette packages.


The above and other aspects thus address the identified needs and provide advantages as otherwise detailed herein.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Having thus described the disclosure in general terms, reference will now be made to the accompanying drawings, which are not necessarily drawn to scale, and wherein:



FIG. 1 is a schematic plan view of a package coding system in a cigarette manufacturing process, according to one aspect of the present disclosure;



FIG. 2 is a schematic of an exemplary cigarette package illustrating package coding, according to one aspect of the present disclosure;



FIG. 3 is a schematic of an imprinting device and an inspection device implemented in a package coding system of a cigarette manufacturing process, according to one aspect of the present disclosure;



FIG. 4 is a schematic of a removal device for a defective cigarette package, as implemented in a package coding system of a cigarette manufacturing process, according to one aspect of the present disclosure; and



FIG. 5 is a schematic plan view of a removal device for a defective cigarette package, and an associated handling device, as implemented in a package coding system of a cigarette manufacturing process, according to one aspect of the present disclosure.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE DISCLOSURE

The present disclosure now will be described more fully hereinafter with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which some, but not all aspects of the disclosure are shown. Indeed, this disclosure may be embodied in many different forms and should not be construed as limited to the aspects set forth herein; rather, these aspects are provided so that this disclosure will satisfy applicable legal requirements. Like numbers refer to like elements throughout.



FIG. 1 schematically illustrates a package coding system implemented in a cigarette manufacturing process, according to one aspect of the present disclosure, the system being generally indicated by the numeral 100. Such a cigarette manufacturing process often includes the transport or conveyance of multiple cigarette packages 200, by a conveyor device 300, in a feed direction 50, wherein each cigarette package may be a “soft pack” or a hard carton, and includes a plurality of cigarette smoking articles packaged therein. In so conveying the cigarette packages 200, a series of such cigarette packages 200 is defined, wherein the packages are all arranged in a particular orientation and are disposed adjacent to each other. That is, any selected cigarette package in the series will have a preceding cigarette package and a subsequent cigarette package disposed adjacent thereto, with no spacing therebetween, in the feed direction 50.


In particular aspects, the present disclosure may include an imprinting device 400 configured to imprint an alphanumeric code 500 on each of a series of cigarette packages 200 (see, e.g., FIG. 2). The alphanumeric code 500 may comprise, for example, a brand, a date, a lot number, a filter type, a tobacco rod type, a serial number, or any other type of code as necessary or desired. The imprinting device 400 may comprise, for example, an inkjet printing device, a laser printing device, a thermal printing device, or any other suitable type of printing device as necessary or desired. In one particular instance, such an imprinting device 400 may comprise, for example, a Model VideoJet UHS or 178I printing device manufactured by Videojet Technologies Inc. of Wood Dale, Ill. In some aspects, the imprinting device 400 may comprise or otherwise be in communication with a computer device 450 for communicating the alphanumeric code 500 to the imprinting device 400 for imprinting thereof on one or more of the cigarette packages 200 in the series.


An inspection device 600 may be operably engaged with the conveyor device 300, downstream in the feed direction with respect to the imprinting device 400, and configured to inspect the alphanumeric code 500 imprinted on each cigarette package 200 conveyed by the conveyor device 300 to determine whether any of the cigarette packages 200 includes a defect in the imprinted alphanumeric code 500. Any such cigarette packages including the defect may comprise, for example, a defective cigarette package 250. Such a defect in the imprinted alphanumeric code 500 may comprise, for example, low print quality, uneven printing, misalignment of the alphanumeric code 500, a substantive error in the alphanumeric code (i.e., the wrong code), or other condition deemed to comprise a defect. In some instances, the inspection device 600 may be disposed in proximity (and downstream in the feed direction) to the imprinting device 400. In other instances, the inspection device 600 and/or the imprinting device 400 may be adjustably supported and mounted so as to allow each component to be suitably aligned with the series of cigarette packages 200 to perform the respective functions. For example, the inspection device 600 and/or the imprinting device 400 may be supported and mounted so as to have adjustability along an x-, y-, and/or z-axis (shown, for example, in FIG. 3, as elements 410, 420, and 430, respectively, for the imprinting device 400) so as to be capable of being positioned, as necessary or desired to accomplish the functions of the package coding system 100 according to the present disclosure.


In some aspects of the disclosure, the inspection device 600 may be configured to execute an image processing procedure to analyze an image 650 of the imprinted alphanumeric code 500 on each of the cigarette packages 200 to determine whether any of the cigarette packages 200 includes the defect. Accordingly, the inspection device 600 may comprise or otherwise include an image capturing device 625 such as, for example, a digital camera or video imaging device. Further, the inspection device 600 may comprise or otherwise be in communication with a computer device, such as the computer device 450, wherein the computer device 450 may be configured to analyze the image(s) 650 captured by the image capturing device 625, using an image processing procedure. In some aspects, the image processing procedure may be configured to analyze, for example, a location of the imprinted alphanumeric code 500 on each of the cigarette packages 200 (as reflected in the images thereof), a print quality of the imprinted alphanumeric code 500 on each of the cigarette packages 200, and a substantive content of the imprinted alphanumeric code 500 on each of the cigarette packages 200. In other aspects, the inspection device 600 and/or image processing procedure may comprise or otherwise be configured to implement a machine vision system. Such a machine vision system may be available as a Model RJR Vision One [Cognex 5600] machine vision system manufactured by Integro of Salisbury, N.C. In some aspects, the inspection device 600 may thus be configured to determine, for example, based upon parameters pre-programmed by an operator or otherwise established in connection with the cigarette manufacturing process, whether the examined alphanumeric code 500 on any of the cigarette packages conveyed by the conveyor device 300 includes a defined defect. Further, in some instances, an image of the alphanumeric code imprinted on each of the cigarette packages in the series may be displayed on a display, while being analyzed by the inspection device 600 and/or during the image processing procedure, in a manner such that the evaluation can be monitored by an operator. For instance, the image of the alphanumeric code on the display may be overlaid with objective criteria (i.e., location, font, print quality, substantive content) to which the code is being compared, in order to provide for manual monitoring of the evaluation.


In the event that a defect is determined (i.e., a defective cigarette package 250 is determined based upon the examination and evaluation of the alphanumeric code 500 thereon by the inspection device 600), the package coding system 100 may further include a removal device 700 operably engaged with the conveyor device 300, downstream in the feed direction with respect to the inspection device 600, and configured to be in communication with the inspection device 600. In such instances, the removal device 700 may be further configured to remove the defective cigarette package 250, as determined by the inspection device 600, from the series of cigarette packages 200 conveyed by the conveyor device 300, in response to identification of the defective cigarette package 250 by the inspection device 600. That is, in some aspects, the inspection device 600 may be configured to identify the defective cigarette package 250 in the series of cigarette packages conveyed by the conveyor device 300, and to direct the removal device 700 (i.e., via the computer device 450) to interact with the defective cigarette package 250, when the defective cigarette package is in registration therewith, to remove the defective cigarette package 250 from the series of cigarette packages conveyed by the conveyor device 300. In particular instances, the removal device 700 may be configured, for example, to direct a pressurized air charge substantially perpendicularly to the feed direction of the conveyor device 300. In such instances, the pressurized air charge may be configured to interact with the defective cigarette package 250, so as to direct the defective cigarette package 250 out of the series of cigarette packages, without interacting with the cigarette packages preceding 225 and subsequent to 230 the defective cigarette package 250 in the series of cigarette packages. For example, a sufficient air charge at a suitably high pressure, released by the removal device 700 and directed toward the defective cigarette package 250 when the defective cigarette package 250 is in registration therewith, may be configured to urge the defective cigarette package 250 out of the series of cigarette packages without disturbing or otherwise affecting the adjacent cigarette packages 225, 230 in the series (see, e.g., FIGS. 1 and 5).


In accomplishing the tracking of the defective cigarette package 250 conveyed by the conveyor device 300 between the inspection device 600 and the removal device 700, a synchronization device 800 may be operably engaged with the inspection device 600, the conveyor device 300, the removal device 700, and the computer device 450 (see, e.g., FIG. 1). Such a synchronization device 800 may be configured, for instance, to determine a position of the defective cigarette package 250 conveyed by the conveyor device 300, in response to the determination thereof by the inspection device 600, and to communicate the position to the removal device 700, so as to notify the removal device 700 of when the defective cigarette package 250 is in registration therewith. For example, the number of cigarette packages disposed between the inspection device 600 and the removal device 700 may be known. As such, upon determination of a defective cigarette package by the inspection device 600, the synchronization device 800 may be configured to notify the removal device 700 to remove the defective cigarette package 250 once the known number of packages has been conveyed past the removal device 700. One skilled in the art will appreciate, however, that the synchronization device 800 may be configured in many different manners, as necessary or desired.


In some aspects, the package coding system 100 may also include a collection device 750, as shown, for example, in FIG. 4, operably engaged with the removal device 700 and the conveyor device 300, and configured to collect the defective cigarette package 250 removed from the series of cigarette packages conveyed by the conveyor device 300. For example, the collection device 750 may comprise a deflector 760 configured to translate the lateral motion of the defective cigarette package 250 to a vertical motion, wherein a receptacle 770 may be disposed vertically adjacent to the deflector 760 to collect the defective cigarette packages 200 for disposal or rework.


In so removing the defective cigarette package(s) 200 from the series being conveyed by the conveyor 300, using the pressurized air charge delivered by the removal device 700, an open space 850 may remain in the series for each such removal (see, e.g., FIG. 5). Accordingly, in some instances, the package coding system 100 may further include a handling device 900 operably engaged with the conveyor device 300 downstream of the removal device 700. The handling device 900 may be configured, for example, to manipulate the series of cigarette packages so as to eliminate the open space therein due to removal of the defective cigarette package 250 by the removal device 700. For instance, such a handling device 900 may comprise a friction device configured and disposed to interact with the cigarette packages being conveyed by the conveyor device 300, wherein the friction device would retain a cigarette package (such that the cigarette package remains stationary while the conveyor device 300 continues to move in the feed direction 50) until dislodged by subsequent cigarette packages in the series. That is, the friction device may be configured to retain a cigarette package until it is dislodged by subsequent cigarette packages conveyed by the conveyor device 300, once the open space 850 caused by the removal of a defective cigarette package 250 is eliminated.


Since, some aspects of the package coding system 100 are directed toward determining defective products in a manufacturing process, it may be necessary or desirable to have the capability of eliminating or otherwise minimizing the occurrence of such defects in order to increase the final production yield. As such, in some instances, the package coding system 100 may also include an analysis device 1000 (see, e.g., FIG. 1) operably engaged with the inspection device 700 and/or the computer device 450, wherein the analysis device 1000 may be configured to analyze the defective cigarette package(s) 200 determined by the inspection device 700, so as to further determine, for example, a defect type associated with the defect and/or a cause of the defect. For example, the defect type may be incorrect substantive content caused by operator input error. In other instances, the defect type may be substandard print quality caused by a low ink level at a print head or a malfunctioning print head associated with the imprinting device 400. In a further example, the defect may comprise an unacceptable location of the alphanumeric code on the cigarette package due to misalignment of the imprinting device 400. Accordingly, the analysis device 1000 may be suitably configured to determine the type or class of the detected defects, ascertain the root cause leading to the defect, and allow the root cause to be addressed, before further defects are realized within the series of cigarette packages. In another aspect, it may be desirable for the inspection device 600 and/or the analysis device 1000 to determine patterns or trends in the detected defects, and to pause or halt the manufacturing process (i.e., to allow the cause of the defects to be corrected) when too many of the defects are detected or if the defects are detected too frequently, so as to minimize or otherwise prevent too many of the products from being deemed to be defective and thereby undesirably lowering process throughput.


Many modifications and other aspects of the disclosure set forth herein will come to mind to one skilled in the art to which this disclosure pertains having the benefit of the teachings presented in the foregoing descriptions and the associated drawings. Therefore, it is to be understood that the disclosure is not to be limited to the specific aspects disclosed and that modifications and other aspects are intended to be included within the scope of the appended claims. Although specific terms are employed herein, they are used in a generic and descriptive sense only and not for purposes of limitation.

Claims
  • 1. A package coding system implemented in a cigarette manufacturing process, said system comprising: an imprinting device configured to imprint an alphanumeric code on each of a series of cigarette packages;a conveyor device configured to convey the cigarette packages, adjacent to and unspaced with respect to each other to form a continuous series and in a feed direction;an inspection device operably engaged with the conveyor device and configured to inspect the alphanumeric code imprinted on each cigarette package in the continuous series thereof conveyed by the conveyor device to determine whether any of the cigarette packages includes a defect in the imprinted alphanumeric code, any of the cigarette packages including the defect being a defective cigarette package;a removal device operably engaged with the conveyor device and configured to be in communication with the inspection device, the removal device being further configured to remove the defective cigarette package from the continuous series of cigarette packages conveyed by the conveyor device in response to identification thereof by the inspection device; anda synchronization device operably engaged with the inspection device, the conveyor device, and the removal device, the synchronization device being configured to determine a position of the defective cigarette package in the continuous series of cigarette packages conveyed by the conveyor device, in response to the determination thereof by the inspection device, and to communicate the position of the defective cigarette package in the continuous series to the removal device so as to notify the removal device of the defective cigarette package being in registration therewith for removal of the defective cigarette package from the continuous series.
  • 2. A system according to claim 1, wherein the inspection device is configured to identify the defective cigarette package in the continuous series of cigarette packages conveyed by the conveyor device, and to direct the removal device to interact with the defective cigarette package, when the defective cigarette package is in registration therewith, to remove the defective cigarette package from the continuous series of cigarette packages conveyed by the conveyor device.
  • 3. A system according to claim 1, wherein the removal device is configured to direct a pressurized air charge substantially perpendicularly to the feed direction of the conveyor device, the pressurized air charge being configured to interact with the defective cigarette package, so as to direct the defective cigarette package out of the continuous series of cigarette packages, without interacting with the cigarette packages preceding and subsequent to the defective cigarette package, and adjacent to and unspaced therewith, in the continuous series of cigarette packages.
  • 4. A system according to claim 3, further comprising a collection device operably engaged with the removal device and the conveyor device and configured to collect the defective cigarette package removed from the continuous series of cigarette packages.
  • 5. A system according to claim 1, wherein the inspection device is configured to execute an image processing procedure to analyze an image of the imprinted alphanumeric code on each of the cigarette packages to determine whether any of the cigarette packages includes the defect.
  • 6. A system according to claim 5, wherein the image processing procedure is configured to analyze one of a location of the imprinted alphanumeric code on each of the cigarette packages, a print quality of the imprinted alphanumeric code on each of the cigarette packages, and a substantive content of the imprinted alphanumeric code on each of the cigarette packages.
  • 7. A system according to claim 1, wherein the inspection device further comprises a machine vision system.
  • 8. A system according to claim 1, further comprising an analysis device operably engaged with the inspection device, the analysis device being configured to analyze the defective cigarette packages determined by the inspection device to determine one of a defect type associated with the defect and a cause of the defect.
  • 9. A system according to claim 1, further comprising a handling device operably engaged with the conveyor device downstream of the removal device, the handling device being configured to manipulate the cigarette packages remaining on the conveyor device downstream of the removal device so as to eliminate any open spaces therebetween due to removal of defective cigarette packages from the continuous series by the removal device.
  • 10. A method of verifying package coding in a cigarette manufacturing process, said method comprising: imprinting an alphanumeric code on each of a series of cigarette packages using an imprinting device;conveying the cigarette packages, adjacent to and unspaced with respect to each other to form a continuous series and in a feed direction, using a conveyor device;inspecting the alphanumeric code imprinted on each cigarette package in the continuous series thereof conveyed by the conveyor device, using an inspection device operably engaged therewith, to determine whether any of the cigarette packages includes a defect in the imprinted alphanumeric code, any of the cigarette packages including the defect being a defective cigarette package;removing the defective cigarette package from the continuous series of cigarette packages conveyed by the conveyor device, using a removal device operably engaged with the conveyor device and configured to be in communication with the inspection device, in response to identification thereof by the inspection device; anddetermining a position of the defective cigarette package in the continuous series of cigarette packages conveyed by the conveyor device, in response to the determination thereof by the inspection device, using a synchronization device operably engaged with the inspection device, the conveyor device, and the removal device, and communicating the position of the defective cigarette package in the continuous series to the removal device so as to notify the removal device of the defective cigarette package being in registration therewith for removal of the defective cigarette package from the continuous series.
  • 11. A method according to claim 10, further comprising identifying the defective cigarette package in the continuous series of cigarette packages conveyed by the conveyor device, with the inspection device, and directing the removal device to interact with the defective cigarette package, when the defective cigarette package is in registration therewith, to remove the defective cigarette package from the continuous series of cigarette packages conveyed by the conveyor device.
  • 12. A method according to claim 10, further comprising directing a pressurized air charge substantially perpendicularly to the feed direction of the conveyor device, with the removal device, the pressurized air charge being configured to interact with the defective cigarette package, so as to direct the defective cigarette package out of the continuous series of cigarette packages, without interacting with the cigarette packages preceding and subsequent to the defective cigarette package, and adjacent to and unspaced therewith, in the continuous series of cigarette packages.
  • 13. A method according to claim 12, further comprising collecting the defective cigarette package removed from the continuous series of cigarette packages using a collection device operably engaged with the removal device and the conveyor device.
  • 14. A method according to claim 10, further comprising executing an image processing procedure, in association with the inspection device, to analyze an image of the imprinted alphanumeric code on each of the cigarette packages to determine whether any of the cigarette packages includes the defect.
  • 15. A method according to claim 14, wherein executing an image processing procedure further comprises analyzing one of a location of the imprinted alphanumeric code on each of the cigarette packages, a print quality of the imprinted alphanumeric code on each of the cigarette packages, and a substantive content of the imprinted alphanumeric code on each of the cigarette packages.
  • 16. A method according to claim 10, wherein inspecting the alphanumeric code further comprises inspecting the alphanumeric code imprinted on each cigarette package, using an inspection device comprising a machine vision system.
  • 17. A method according to claim 10, further comprising analyzing the defective cigarette packages determined by the inspection device, using an analysis device operably engaged with the inspection device, to determine one of a defect type associated with the defect and a cause of the defect.
  • 18. A method according to claim 10, further comprising manipulating the cigarette packages remaining on the conveyor device downstream of the removal device, using a handling device operably engaged with the conveyor device downstream of the removal device, so as to eliminate any open spaces therebetween due to removal of defective cigarette packages from the continuous series by the removal device.
US Referenced Citations (183)
Number Name Date Kind
3288147 Molins et al. Nov 1966 A
3301454 Wayne et al. Jan 1967 A
3308600 Erdmann et al. Mar 1967 A
3366121 Carty Jan 1968 A
3398675 Potter et al. Aug 1968 A
3424172 Neurath Jan 1969 A
3428049 Leake et al. Feb 1969 A
3444517 Rabinow May 1969 A
3550508 Wartman, Jr. Dec 1970 A
3550598 McGlumphy et al. Dec 1970 A
3575276 Rupert Apr 1971 A
3602231 Dock Aug 1971 A
3685521 Dock Aug 1972 A
3818223 Gibson et al. Jun 1974 A
3884246 Walker May 1975 A
3915176 Heitmann et al. Oct 1975 A
4053056 Day Oct 1977 A
4083460 Venturi Apr 1978 A
4171739 Yamato Oct 1979 A
4174719 Martin et al. Nov 1979 A
4238993 Brand et al. Dec 1980 A
4280187 Reuland et al. Jul 1981 A
4281670 Heitmann et al. Aug 1981 A
4281671 Bynre et al. Aug 1981 A
4284088 Brand et al. Aug 1981 A
4291713 Frank Sep 1981 A
4294353 Focke et al. Oct 1981 A
RE30964 Butner et al. Jun 1982 E
4403620 Joseph et al. Sep 1983 A
4445520 Knight et al. May 1984 A
4474190 Brand Oct 1984 A
4534463 Bouchard Aug 1985 A
4574816 Rudszinat Mar 1986 A
4715497 Focke et al. Dec 1987 A
4736754 Heitmann et al. Apr 1988 A
4781203 La Hue Nov 1988 A
4807809 Pryor et al. Feb 1989 A
4811745 Cohen et al. Mar 1989 A
4844100 Holznagel Jul 1989 A
4850301 Greene, Jr. et al. Jul 1989 A
4852734 Allen et al. Aug 1989 A
4862905 Green, Jr. et al. Sep 1989 A
4878506 Pinck et al. Nov 1989 A
4889144 Tateno et al. Dec 1989 A
4920990 Lawrence et al. May 1990 A
4925602 Hill et al. May 1990 A
5012823 Keritsis et al. May 1991 A
5012829 Thesing et al. May 1991 A
5025814 Raker Jun 1991 A
5060664 Siems et al. Oct 1991 A
5060665 Heitmann Oct 1991 A
5074320 Jones, Jr. et al. Dec 1991 A
5101609 Cook Apr 1992 A
5101839 Jakob et al. Apr 1992 A
5105838 White et al. Apr 1992 A
5131416 Gentry Jul 1992 A
5139140 Burrows et al. Aug 1992 A
5156169 Holmes et al. Oct 1992 A
5159944 Arzonico et al. Nov 1992 A
5167244 Kjerstad Dec 1992 A
5191906 Myracle, Jr. Mar 1993 A
5220930 Gentry Jun 1993 A
5225277 Takegawa et al. Jul 1993 A
5240117 Focke et al. Aug 1993 A
5271419 Arzonico et al. Dec 1993 A
5333729 Wolfe Aug 1994 A
5353357 Longest et al. Oct 1994 A
5360023 Blakley et al. Nov 1994 A
5387285 Rivers Feb 1995 A
5396909 Gentry et al. Mar 1995 A
5432600 Grollimund et al. Jul 1995 A
5472002 Covarrubias Dec 1995 A
5476108 Dominguez et al. Dec 1995 A
5515159 Sites et al. May 1996 A
5660382 Meier Aug 1997 A
5718250 Banerjee et al. Feb 1998 A
5740902 Spatafora Apr 1998 A
5898104 Rohrssen et al. Apr 1999 A
5938018 Keaveney et al. Aug 1999 A
5977780 Herrmann Nov 1999 A
6020969 Struckhoff et al. Feb 2000 A
6054665 Focke et al. Apr 2000 A
6117455 Takada et al. Sep 2000 A
6158193 Focke et al. Dec 2000 A
6213128 Smith et al. Apr 2001 B1
6229115 Voss et al. May 2001 B1
6246778 Moore Jun 2001 B1
6360751 Fagg et al. Mar 2002 B1
6384359 Belcastro et al. May 2002 B1
6385333 Puckett et al. May 2002 B1
6537186 Veluz Mar 2003 B1
6612429 Dennen Sep 2003 B2
6647878 Blau et al. Nov 2003 B2
6726006 Funderburk et al. Apr 2004 B1
6736261 Thomas et al. May 2004 B1
6761174 Jupe et al. Jul 2004 B2
6779530 Kraker Aug 2004 B2
6813961 Stiller et al. Nov 2004 B2
6848449 Kitao et al. Feb 2005 B2
6904917 Kitao et al. Jun 2005 B2
7074170 Lanier, Jr. et al. Jul 2006 B2
7115085 Deal Oct 2006 B2
7210486 Hartmann May 2007 B2
7234471 Fitzgerald et al. Jun 2007 B2
7237559 Ashcraft et al. Jul 2007 B2
7240678 Crooks et al. Jul 2007 B2
7275548 Hancock et al. Oct 2007 B2
7281540 Barnes et al. Oct 2007 B2
7296578 Read, Jr. Nov 2007 B2
7325382 Nelson et al. Feb 2008 B2
7434585 Holmes Oct 2008 B2
7479098 Thomas et al. Jan 2009 B2
7565818 Thomas et al. Jul 2009 B2
7578298 Karles et al. Aug 2009 B2
7654945 Deal Feb 2010 B2
7740019 Nelson et al. Jun 2010 B2
7744922 Mane et al. Jun 2010 B2
7784356 Spiers et al. Aug 2010 B2
7833146 Deal Nov 2010 B2
7836895 Dube et al. Nov 2010 B2
7861728 Holton, Jr. et al. Jan 2011 B2
7972254 Stokes et al. Jul 2011 B2
8142339 Deal Mar 2012 B2
8186359 Ademe et al. May 2012 B2
8262550 Barnes et al. Sep 2012 B2
8308623 Nelson et al. Nov 2012 B2
20010032932 Focke et al. Oct 2001 A1
20020185141 Heide Dec 2002 A1
20030136419 Muller Jul 2003 A1
20030137312 Cerati et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030145866 Hartmann Aug 2003 A1
20030178036 Demmer et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030206023 Herrmann Nov 2003 A1
20040129281 Hancock et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040141174 Focke et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040217023 Fagg et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040256253 Henson et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040261807 Dube et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050016556 Ashcraft et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050039764 Barnes et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050066986 Nestor et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050075754 Zeitler et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050076929 Fitzgerald et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050112228 Smith et al. May 2005 A1
20050150786 Mitten et al. Jul 2005 A1
20060169295 Draghetti Aug 2006 A1
20060207616 Hapke et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060243611 Wu Nov 2006 A1
20060272655 Thomas et al. Dec 2006 A1
20070056600 Coleman, III et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070102015 Villarinho May 2007 A1
20070144542 Bencivenni et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070215167 Crooks et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070246055 Oglesby Oct 2007 A1
20080093234 Jones et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080099353 Parsons et al. May 2008 A1
20080142028 Fagg Jun 2008 A1
20080179204 Lutzig Jul 2008 A1
20080202540 Carter et al. Aug 2008 A1
20090050163 Hartmann et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090066948 Karpowicz et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090090372 Thomas et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090120449 Tindall May 2009 A1
20100059074 Brantley et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100101589 Nelson et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100184576 Prestia et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100236561 Barnes et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100293106 Rhoads et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100294290 Zhang Nov 2010 A1
20110053745 Iliev et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110067976 Pelagatti Mar 2011 A1
20110162662 Nikolov et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110162665 Burov et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110169942 Brantley et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110230320 Stokes et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110271968 Carpenter et al. Nov 2011 A1
20120037546 Dixon et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120055493 Novak, III et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120077658 Nikolov et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120080043 Naenen et al. Apr 2012 A1
20120120229 Brantley et al. May 2012 A1
20120245006 Henley et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120245007 Henley et al. Sep 2012 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (25)
Number Date Country
10238906 Mar 2004 DE
10 2008 062 370 Jun 2010 DE
0 292 949 Nov 1988 EP
0 704 172 Apr 1996 EP
1 669 755 Jun 2006 EP
1 754 419 Feb 2007 EP
1 767 107 Mar 2007 EP
1 916 188 Apr 2008 EP
2 243 384 Oct 2010 EP
1058343 Feb 1967 GB
2 020 158 Nov 1979 GB
1042000 Sep 1996 GB
9325123 Dec 1997 JP
2001-190262 Jul 2001 JP
2003-219855 Aug 2003 JP
2004-504825 Feb 2004 JP
WO 0179092 Oct 2001 WO
WO 03009711 Feb 2003 WO
WO 03047836 Jun 2003 WO
WO 03082558 Oct 2003 WO
WO 2005113386 Dec 2005 WO
WO 2006064371 Jun 2006 WO
WO 2006092962 Sep 2006 WO
WO 2007028957 Mar 2007 WO
WO 2007038053 Apr 2007 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (2)
Entry
Davis et al., Tobacco Production, Chemistry and Technology, 1999, pp. 440-460, Blackwell Science, Inc., Malden, MA.
Johnson, Development of Cigarette Components to Meet Industry Needs, 52nd T.S.R.C., Sep. 1998.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20130096711 A1 Apr 2013 US