Information
-
Patent Grant
-
6248971
-
Patent Number
6,248,971
-
Date Filed
Monday, April 19, 199925 years ago
-
Date Issued
Tuesday, June 19, 200123 years ago
-
Inventors
-
Original Assignees
-
Examiners
Agents
- Parkhurst & Wendel, L.L.P.
-
CPC
-
US Classifications
Field of Search
US
- 218 2
- 218 15
- 218 44
- 218 46
- 218 71
- 218 119
- 218 152
- 218 153
- 218 157
-
International Classifications
-
Abstract
A circuit breaker comprises a plurality of pole compartments juxtaposed inside an insulating case, in each of which compartments there are arranged an arc extinguishing chamber and at least one pair of separable contact parts comprising at least one movable contact part, at least two of said pole compartments being contiguous and separated from one another by a partition. The separating partition of the twinned poles comprises a communicating aperture of dimensions and location such that it is able to appreciably influence the distribution of the arcing energy between the two compartments when the latter are connected in parallel. A circuit breaker with a high breaking capacity is thus obtained from a standard multipole circuit breaker of lower breaking capacity.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The invention relates to a circuit breaker at least one phase of which is formed by several poles mounted in parallel.
The circuit breaker rating, i.e. the value of the rated current of the circuit breaker, is, for a case of predetermined size, determined by the choice of the poles, i.e. essentially by the dimensions of the copper parts associated to the pole.
It is desirable to be able to extend a circuit breaker range by associating circuit breakers comprising a certain number of standard poles so as to obtain, for a minimum additional cost, a circuit breaker of higher rating than that of the conventional poles which make up the circuit breaker. For this purpose, it has been proposed, in the document EP-A-0,320,412, to connect two adjacent poles of a standard circuit breaker in parallel. At least one phase of the circuit breaker is then constituted by two poles, each comprising a stationary contact extended by a contact strip protruding out from the case, a movable contact connected by a flexible conductor to a second contact strip protruding out from the frame, and an arc extinguishing chamber. One connecting strip is fixed to the contact strips of the stationary contacts of the two poles and another connecting strip is fixed to the contact strips of the movable contacts, thus achieving twinning of the two poles.
Experience however shows that when breaking occurs under these conditions, the arcing current does not divide uniformly between the two twinned poles. Very quickly, the arcing current in fact only persists in one of the two breaking chambers. If the ultimate short-circuit breaking capacity assigned to the circuit breaker remains identical to that of the original standard circuit breaker, this phenomenon does not have any drawbacks. If on the other hand a higher breaking capacity is sought for, the arcing energy becomes too great for a single chamber. The twinned pole construction of the state of the technique therefore proves unsuitable for manufacture of a circuit breaker whose breaking capacity is higher than that of the individual circuit breakers which make it up. This is why circuit breakers with high breaking capacity of the state of the technique do not use standard chambers mounted in parallel.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
One object of the invention is therefore to extend a circuit breaker range so as to form, from existing circuit breakers, a circuit breaker of higher rating and breaking capacity than the individual circuit breakers which make it up, with a minimum number of modifications. Another object is to increase the breaking capacity of a circuit breaker with twinned poles.
These objects are achieved according to a first feature of the invention by means of a circuit breaker comprising at least two contiguous pole compartments separated by a partition and juxtaposed inside an insulating case, in each compartment there are arranged an arc extinguishing chamber and a pair of separable contact parts, each contact part of one of the compartments being electrically connected in parallel with a corresponding contact part of the other compartment or able to be connected thereto, a circuit breaker which comprises means for distributing the arcing energy in the two compartments, comprising at least one communicating aperture between the two contiguous compartments, arranged in the partition. In other words, when the opening performances of the compartments connected in parallel with and without an aperture are compared, the distribution of the arcing energy between the two chambers is appreciably more balanced when the aperture exists than when it is absent.
According to a second feature of the invention, these objects are achieved with a circuit breaker comprising at least two contiguous pole compartments separated by a partition and juxtaposed inside an insulating case, in each compartment there are arranged an arc extinguishing chamber and a pair of separable contact parts. The circuit breaker also comprises an operating mechanism linked to the separable contact parts of the two compartments in such a way that their separation is either simultaneous or almost simultaneous. The corresponding contact parts in each compartment are electrically connected in parallel to form a single pole with an ultimate breaking capacity l
cu
for a given corresponding assigned voltage v
cu
and power factor k
cu
, wherein said partition comprises at least one communicating aperture between the two contiguous compartments, of dimensions and location such that, when a current of an intensity equal to 50% of the ultimate breaking capacity l
cu
of the pole for the voltage v
cu
and power factor k
cu
is flowing globally through the pole, the ratio between the arcing energy in the least solicited of the compartments and the arcing energy in the other compartment is greater than ⅙, the arcing energy being measured for each compartment by the integral
where
v(t) is the instantaneous value of the voltage at the terminals of the contact parts
i(t) is the instantaneous value of the current intensity flowing through the contact parts
t
0
is the time when separation of the contact parts begins
t
4
is the time when the current intensity flowing through the contact parts is finally cancelled.
The physical phenomena generated by the aperture in the partition separating the two compartments are complex. The presence of the aperture first of all has a thermodynamic aspect: the hot ionized gases at high pressure generated in the compartment whose arc is greater enter the other compartment. This particle movement has various effects some of which are positive and others of which are not. From an energy point of view, the hot gases which have migrated can use the separators of the cooler chamber to cool down, which is beneficial. From an electrical point of view, the presence of ionized gas in the compartment whose arc is weakening or extinguishing tends to revive this arc. From an aerodynamic point of view on the other hand, the gas movements and possible pressure waves from one compartment to the other can have an influence on the movement of the arc foot, and elongation of the arc in each compartment, with a risk of hindering movement of the arc to the arc extinguishing chamber due to the effect of the electrodynamic forces. However this electrodynamic phenomenon, called blowing, is of prime importance to achieve breaking and it is not desirable that its effect be reduced. Likewise, from the point of view of the variation of the pressures in the two compartments, the orifice also appears counter-productive. In fact a pressure decrease occurs in the compartment whose arc is greater and a pressure increase occurs in the other compartment. But theory indicates that a high pressure enhances a decrease of the straight cross-section of the arcing column, and therefore an increase of its electrical resistance and of the arcing voltage. This is moreover one of the main reasons for the existence of arc extinguishing chambers which, by performing a confinement of the arc, enable a considerable increase of the pressure in which the arc is located. Decreasing the pressure in the compartment whose arc is greater therefore means decreasing the arcing voltage and favoring maintenance of the arc.
Globally, in surprising and unpredictable manner, it proves possible to position and calibrate the aperture in such a way that mutual restrikings of the two arcs occur during breaking, which enables the arcing energy to be distributed over the two chambers in significant proportions and a greater absorption capacity to be achieved globally. Naturally the energy distribution is not perfectly balanced, but the important thing is that the energy dissipated in each compartment be of the same order of magnitude, i.e. in a proportion better than 1 for 10. In practice it is about ⅓ to ⅔. This is sufficient to relieve the pole which is more affected by the arc and to increase the breaking capacity of the assembly formed by the two compartments with respect to a single compartment.
Preferably the aperture is situated close to the zone where the arc is drawn in the separation phase of the contact parts. This arrangement provides the advantage of limiting the risk of damage of the contact parts as best as possible. It does in fact ensure that distribution of the arcing energy is effective very early in the opening phase of the contact parts. Furthermore, it should be emphasized that when expansion of the arc takes place in the breaking chamber, the deionization plates are subjected to high electromagnetic stresses perpendicularly to their main plane, which tends to deform them. This phenomenon is an obstacle to widening of the breaking chamber. In practice, the plates used for breaking chambers of large dimensions are more rigid—and therefore thicker for a given material—and are arranged at a larger distance from one another to prevent contact when deformations occur. This has the consequence of the height of the chamber increasing with its width. According to this preferred embodiment of the invention, i.e. by dimensioning the communication orifice in such a way that the separating partition keeps its support function, it becomes possible to widen the chamber without modifying its other dimensions.
According to a preferred embodiment, the arc extinguishing chamber, in each of the contiguous compartments, has a mouth opening out on the side where the contact parts are situated, this mouth being confined on one of its edges by a lower arcing horn designed to receive the foot of the electrical arc at its entry into the chamber, the aperture being disposed and dimensioned in such a way that the lower arcing horns in the contiguous compartments are located directly facing one another on each side of the aperture. This arrangement gives very satisfactory results. According to a complementary arrangement, the mouth of the arc extinguishing chamber opening out on the side where the contact parts are located in each of the contiguous compartments is confined on an edge opposite the lower arcing horn by an upper arcing horn, the aperture being disposed and dimensioned in such a way that the zones situated between the lower arcing horn and the upper arcing horn of each compartment are located directly facing one another on each side of the aperture.
Likewise, the distribution is good when the opening of the aperture in each compartment is located close to the contact zone of the pairs of separable contact parts.
According to a preferred embodiment, the dimensions of the aperture are such that the part of the movable contact parts of each compartment on which the head of the electrical arc is located when separation of the contact parts takes place is facing the corresponding part of the movable contact part in the other compartment, both in the closed position and in the open position.
For circuit breakers whose pairs of separable contact parts comprise a stationary contact part, it may be advantageous for the opening of the aperture in each compartment to be situated close to the stationary contact part.
It is always preferable that the walls of the aperture have a high dielectric strength.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
Other advantages and features of the invention will become more clearly apparent from the following description of different embodiments of the invention, given as non-restrictive examples only and represented in the accompanying drawings.
FIG. 1
represents an exploded perspective view of a circuit breaker according to the invention.
FIG. 2
represents a longitudinal cross-section of the circuit breaker of
FIG. 1
, according to a mid-plane of a twinned pole of the circuit breaker.
FIG. 3
represents an exploded view of an arc extinguishing chamber of a pole of the circuit breaker according to the invention.
FIG. 4
represents a partially exploded perspective view of a rear compartment of the circuit breaker of
FIG. 1
, showing more particularly a communication orifice between two twinned poles according to the invention.
FIG. 5
represents a transverse cross section showing two twinned poles;
FIG. 6
represents an experimental device enabling an arcing energy to be evaluated when opening of the twinned poles takes place.
FIG. 7
represents different curves characteristic of breaking.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
With reference to
FIGS. 1 and 2
, a six-pole circuit breaker
10
comprises an insulating case formed by assembly of a rear base
12
, an intermediate frame
14
open at the front and rear, and a front panel
16
, which confine a rear compartment and a front compartment on each side of a front partition
18
of the intermediate frame
14
. An operating mechanism
20
of the circuit breaker
10
acting on a switching shaft
22
common to all the poles of the circuit breaker is housed in the front compartment. This mechanism
20
is fitted onto the front partition
18
of the intermediate frame
14
.
The rear compartment is itself sub-divided into elementary compartments by intermediate partitions
24
,
25
(cf.
FIG. 4
) of the intermediate frame
14
. Each elementary compartment houses a pole of the circuit breaker. Each pole comprises a separable contact device and an arc extinguishing chamber
26
.
The separable contact device comprises a stationary contact part
28
directly supported by a first connecting strip
30
of the circuit breaker passing through the base
12
of the insulating case, and a movable contact part
32
. The latter is provided with a plurality of contact fingers
34
in parallel pivotally mounted on a first transverse spindle
36
of a support carrier
38
. The heel of each finger is connected to a second connecting strip
40
passing through the base
12
by means of a braided strip
42
made of conducting material. The connecting strips
30
,
40
are designed to be connected to the line-side and load-side power system, for example via a busbar. The end of the carrier
38
situated close to the second connecting strip
40
is equipped with a spindle housed in a bearing securedly affixed to the insulating case, for allowing to allow pivoting of the carrier
38
between an open position and a closed position of the pole around a geometric axis
44
shown in
FIG. 2. A
contact pressure spring device
46
is arranged in a notch of the carrier
38
and urges the contact fingers
34
in counter-clockwise pivoting around the first spindle
36
. Each contact finger
34
comprises a contact pad
47
which, in the position represented in
FIG. 2
, is in contact with a single pad
49
arranged on the stationary contact part
28
. The carrier
38
is coupled to the switching shaft
22
by a transmission rod
48
in such a way that rotation of the shaft
22
induces pivoting of the carrier
38
around the axis
44
.
The structure of the arc extinguishing chamber
26
can be more particularly seen in FIG.
3
. The chamber comprises a stacking of metallic electrical arc deionization plates
50
assembled on an insulating support comprising two side cheeks
52
. The internal face of each cheek
52
is provided with notches operating in conjunction with complementary asperities of the plates for positioning of the latter. Positioning of an upper arcing horn
54
is performed in the same way. A composite external wall
56
is located appreciably perpendicularly to the side cheeks and to the deionization plates. This wall constitutes a frame for assembly of the side cheeks. It comprises outlet orifices for removal of the breaking gases and a stack of intermediate filters
58
designed to limit pollution of the external environment.
It can be seen in
FIG. 4
how the arc extinguishing chamber
26
is inserted in one of the elementary compartments of the circuit breaker, here a lateral compartment bounded by an intermediate partition
24
and one of the external side partitions
60
of the intermediate frame
14
. This construction enables the state of the circuit breaker poles to be checked and the arc extinguishing chamber
26
to be replaced with a reduced number of handling operations.
The extinguishing device is completed by a lower arc guiding horn
62
fixed to the base
12
and electrically connected to the stationary contact part
28
of the pole, which confines the inlet of the extinguishing chamber
26
in the downwards direction. The stationary contact
28
has, in the zone directly facing the front end of the fingers
34
of the movable contact part
32
, a profiled edge
64
approximately complementary to the profile of the fingers
34
, extending upwards to the protuberance of the lower horn
62
to provide globally with the latter a profile without a notable break in the slope. This zone of the stationary contact, called spark arrester, enables the risks of damage of the contact pads
47
and
49
to be eliminated. Indeed, when opening of the contact parts takes place, the initial pivoting movement of the carrier
38
around its axis
44
—clockwise in FIG.
2
—causes pivoting of the movable fingers
34
around their spindle
36
in the opposite direction. In this initial phase, this conjugate movement results in the front part of the fingers
34
and the spark arrester being moved towards one another and coming into contact before the contact pads
47
,
49
separate. When separation of the pads
47
,
49
takes place, the fingers
34
are in a position such that the distance between the pads
47
,
49
increases more quickly than the distance between the lower horn
62
and the fingers
34
of the movable contact
32
. The arc is consequently initially drawn between the spark arrester and the front end of the fingers
34
and immediately migrates to implant itself between the protuberance of the horn
62
and the front part of the fingers
34
, preventing any displacement of the arc towards the pads
47
,
49
or any striking at the level of the latter. When opening continues, the arc extends in front of the chamber and enters the latter in the usual manner.
The poles of the circuit breaker
10
are twinned in pairs so as to form three groups of two adjacent poles. By twinning we mean electrical connection in parallel of the stationary contact parts
28
of the two poles on the one hand and of the movable contact parts
32
of the two poles on the other hand. In practice, this twinning is performed outside the case at the level of the free ends of the connecting strips
30
,
40
of the contacts to be connected, by interposition of two connecting strips
66
visible for one of the poles in
FIG. 4
, these two strips being fixed via both ends to a corresponding part of each connecting strip
30
,
40
, extending outside the case.
The three intermediate partitions
24
separating two twinned compartments differ from the other two intermediate partitions
25
in that they comprise a communicating aperture
68
of appreciably rectangular cross-section, as can be seen in
FIGS. 2
,
4
and
5
. This aperture is situated near the contact zone, at the level of the inlet of the arc extinguishing chamber. It is arranged in such a way that the lower arcing horns
62
of the two twinned poles are facing one another on each side of the aperture. In the heightwise direction, measured according to an axis perpendicular to the base
12
, the aperture
68
extends appreciably up to the height of the upper horns
54
. In the lengthwise direction, measured according to an axis perpendicular to the previous axis and to the pivoting axis
44
of the movable contact part
32
, the aperture extends on each side of the inlet of the chamber
26
. The inlets of the two extinguishing chambers
26
are in fact not separated by the intermediate partition
24
. It is thus possible to define an inlet mouth common to the two extinguishing chambers
26
, which is materialized, in a straight cross-section perpendicular to the longitudinal axis, by an appreciably rectangular common orifice whose edge is defined according to the edge of the upper horn
54
of one of the poles, the edge of the upper horn
54
of this twinned pole, the protuberant upper edge of the lower horn
62
of the twinned pole, the corresponding edge of the lower horn
62
of the first pole and a part of the wall of the intermediate partition
25
with no aperture—or of the external side partition
60
, depending on the case—of the first pole. As can be seen particularly in
FIGS. 2
to
4
, the side cheeks
52
of the extinguishing chambers
26
have a cutout
70
corresponding to the aperture
68
of the intermediate partition
24
separating the twinned poles. The face of the side cheeks
52
of each extinguishing chamber
26
facing the adjacent intermediate partition
24
,
25
is adjoined over the whole surface of the partition.
The circuit breaker operates in the following manner: when a fault current occurs detected by a trip device, the operating mechanism
20
causes opening of the circuit breaker by pivoting of the switching shaft
22
which moves all the carriers
38
of the movable contact parts
32
to their open position. The initial pivoting of the carriers
38
causes rocking of the contact fingers
34
in the opposite direction. A fleeting contact is established between the front face of the fingers
34
and the spark arrester, before the contact pads
47
,
49
separate. This fleeting contact lasts for a sufficiently long time after separation of the pads
47
,
49
for the current to be established between the contact fingers
34
and the spark arrester. Continuation of the movement of the carrier
38
results in separation of the contact fingers
34
and of the spark arrester. An arc root arises on the spark arrester and migrates rapidly onto the lower horn
62
due to the effect of the electrodynamic forces, whereas the arc head is established on the front part of the fingers
34
. At the end of opening travel of the movable contact part
32
, the arc switches from the fingers
34
of the movable contact part onto the upper horn
54
; at this moment, an arc is latched between the lower horn
62
and the upper horn
54
. The same phenomenon does not occur at the same time on the twinned pole, which in fact does not immediately see establishment of an arc similar to that of the first pole. The whole of the current flows in the arc of one of the two compartments only. However, the presence of the communicating aperture
68
between the two compartments enables the arc to flash by breakdown and to develop with a slight delay in the deficient compartment. There is therefore distribution of the current and arcing energy between the two compartments.
Comparative tests, illustrated by
FIGS. 6 and 7
, have enabled the efficiency of the device according to the invention to be shown. A prospective current of an rms value of 130 kA (i.e. about 270 kA peak for closing of asymmetric type with a power factor 0.2) was delivered to two poles of 3200 A rating, having an ultimate breaking capacity of 100 kA, mounted in parallel. As illustrated by
FIG. 6
, the instantaneous intensity of the current flowing in each pole was measured by ammeters
72
,
74
, and the voltage at the terminals of the poles by a voltmeter
76
. The measured instantaneous values were transmitted to a processing unit
78
for computation of the energy integrals characteristic of each branch.
FIG. 7
represents the curves characteristic of breaking versus time t, i.e.: the total current i
a
+i
b
flowing in the two branches A and B of the circuit, the voltage v at the common terminals of the two twinned poles, the current intensity in each of the two branches and the distance d between the movable contact part and the stationary contact part. Before the time t
0
, the poles were closed. The current was distributed substantially one half in each pole, i.e. 135 kA peak per pole. Opening was triggered at the time t
0
. In the first pole A, the electrical arc occurred as from t
0
and continued after the time t
1
when the current passed 0. In the second pole B, the electrical arc occurred at t
0
but was extinguished when the current passed 0. Between the times t
0
and t
2
, the current was flowing through the pole A only. The time t
2
marks restriking of the electrical arc in the pole B, as witnessed by the reappearance of a current in this branch of the circuit. Between the times t
2
and t
3
, the arc exists simultaneously in the two poles which both have a current flowing through them. At t
2
, the arcing voltage has slightly decreased before starting to increase again in absolute value. The intensity of the current in the pole B has remained in absolute value always lower than that of the pole A. Cancelling of the current at the end of a time t
3
in the pole B witnesses that the arc has been extinguished in this compartment. At the time t
4
, the current has also been cancelled in the compartment A witnessing that the arc has been extinguished. The arcing voltage continued to increase in absolute value without the current reappearing. Breaking took place in less than a half-period. The arcing energy, evaluated by the integral W of the product of the current i(t) by the voltage v(t) between t
0
and t
4
in each of the two branches of the circuit shows that about ⅔ of the energy has been dissipated in the compartment A and ⅓ in compartment B. This result can moreover be read directly on the curves of
FIG. 7
, in which the areas bounded by the current intensity curves in the branches A and B are approximately representative of the arcing energies in each of the branches, if note is taken that the arcing voltage is common to the two branches and appreciably constant.
Under similar conditions, with a circuit breaker only differing from the previous one by the absence of aperture in the intermediate partition, the arc originated in both compartments, but was extinguished in one of the two the first time the current passed 0. Subsequently, it developed in one of the two compartments only. The arc was extinguished the second time the current passed 0 but restriking occurred almost instantaneously. Breaking was not successful and the test resulted in destruction of the pole where the arc developed. This stems from the fact that the current applied was greater than the ultimate breaking capacity of each compartment and that the energy distribution between the two compartments was very mediocre, in practice less than {fraction (1/10)}.
In test conditions with a current of an intensity lower than the ultimate breaking capacity of the circuit breaker without a communicating aperture, substantial difference of behavior is obtained. The following test was carried out. Taking as reference the assembly formed by the two pole compartments connected in parallel to globally constitute a single pole and comprising a communicating aperture, and in test conditions with a current of intensity l equal to 50% of the ultimate breaking capacity l
cu
of this pole, for the voltage v
cu
and power factor k
cu
used to define the ultimate breaking capacity l
cu
the ratio: of the arcing energy W
B
in the less solicited branch to the arcing energy W
A
in the more solicited branch (W
B≦
W
A
) between the time t
0
when opening begins and the time t
4
when the current is finally cancelled in the last compartment was measured. For a pole according to the invention, the ratio obtained when the tests were carried out was always greater than ⅙. For a pole constituted by similar compartments mounted in parallel but with no communicating aperture, the measured ratio was at best about 0.1. This means that in practice, although the arc arises in both compartments, it is extinguished in one of them at the latest the first time the current passes 0, and subsequently only persists in the other compartment. Given the favorable experimental conditions chosen, i.e. an applied current lower than the ultimate breaking capacity of a single compartment, breaking does take place, but it is very hard on the more solicited compartment.
Comparative tests were carried out with apertures of different sizes and apertures located at different places. The measurements were made for short-circuit values of 130, 150 and 180 kA single-phase under an AC voltage of 508 V with a power factor of about 0.15.
ratio
of the values of the arcing energy generated in each of the two compartments between the time t
0
when opening begins and the time t
4
when the current is finally cancelled in the last compartment was retained as the index of distribution of the arcing energy between the two compartments and of the efficiency of the device, the ideal value being 1.
Experience shows that the efficiency of the device depends on the location of the aperture in the chamber. The efficiency decreases when the aperture is located far from the contact zone. The best results were obtained with an aperture arranged in such a way that, in the opening phase of the contacts, i.e. between the time when the movable contact leaves the stationary contact and the time it reaches its up position, at least a part of the arc, preferably its root on the stationary contact side, is facing the opening of the aperture. It is believed that the pressure and the gas flow generated by the arc are the most liable to propagate into the other chamber. If the aperture is moved towards the inside of the chamber, the arc only reaches it late, and at a time when it is already cooled, so that the probabilities of breakdown in the twinned compartment are lower. In addition, this configuration is detrimental to the rigidity of the extinguishing chamber. If on the other hand the aperture is moved towards the pads, the breakdown in the twinned compartment is liable to take place at the level of the pads, which contributes to damaging the latter.
The efficiency also varies with the size of the cross section of the aperture. A sufficient height of the aperture may be about a half of the distance between the root and the head of the arc at the end of opening, i.e., with the structure of the poles adopted for the experiment, half of the distance between the lower horn and the upper horn. However, this arrangement is only suitable for circuit breakers with relatively slow opening and relatively weak currents (less than 150 kA). For circuit breakers with faster opening and higher currents, the aperture has to be sufficiently high for the root and head of the arc to be facing the aperture at the time when the movable contact reaches its up position. In other words, the result is better when the part of the movable contacts where the head of the arc is located is facing the corresponding part of the movable contact of the twinned compartment throughout the ascending opening movement of the movable contacts. It is in fact only when the energy developed by the arc is sufficiently great, with corresponding temperature and pressure increases, that breakdown giving rise to an arc in the twinned compartment can take place. However, for extreme test parameters, and in particular a very high opening speed, these conditions are not present before the end of the ascending movement of the movable contacts. It should be underlined that the desired effect is not decreased if the height of the aperture is increased beyond the maximum height of the arc. In practice, the height of the aperture is limited by the presence of the upper horn, for which lateral securings are necessary.
As far as the width of the aperture is concerned, it should be considered that the arc, due to the electrodynamic blowing effect, tends to move towards the chamber. The results are therefore better when the aperture is wide enough for the whole of the arc to be facing it throughout the opening phase. As an indication, the width should not be less than one third of the height. Satisfactory results are obtained when the width is about a half the height. A larger width does not in itself reduce the effect sought for. However, with the previously described pole structure, the width of the aperture is limited on one side by the presence of the chamber which requires lateral support cheeks and on the other side by the presence of the contact pads which have to be preserved from the risks of rebreakdown of the electrical arc.
Naturally, a different arrangement of the poles can result in a slightly different location. Notably, if the pole is dimensioned so that the arc arises at the level of the contact pads before being blown towards the chamber, it becomes useful for the stationary contact pads to be facing one another through the aperture.
Naturally, various modifications can be made for the purpose of improving the distribution of the arcing energy even further. For example, it can be envisaged to connect the movable contact of each twinned pole with the stationary contact of the other twinned pole. It can also be envisaged to provide the orifice with a check valve allowing communication between chambers only when a certain pressure difference is exceeded. The orifice can be shaped as a neck flared at its ends to enhance the gas flow. It may also be useful to coat the edges of the aperture with a coating having a high dielectric strength, so as not to hinder development of the arc. The rectangular shape of the cross-section of the aperture used in the example described can be replaced by a different shape, provided that the dimensional criteria retained are respected. An aperture of oblong or elliptic cross section can for example be envisaged, one of whose axes has a dimension corresponding to the width in the above example and the other of whose axes has a dimension corresponding to the height in the example.
Claims
- 1. A circuit breaker comprising: an insulating case;at least one pair of contiguous pole compartments, the contiguous compartments of said pair of pole compartments being separated from one another by a partition wall and juxtaposed inside said insulating case; an arc extinguishing chamber located in each of the compartments of said pair of pole compartments; a pair of separable contact parts located in each of said pair of pole compartments; means for electrically connecting in parallel each contact part of the pair of separable contact parts located in one of the pole compartments with a corresponding contact part of the pair of separable contact parts located in the other pole compartment; at least one communicating aperture located in the partition wall distributing arcing energy between the two contiguous compartments of said pair of pole compartments; a lower arcing horn located in each contiguous compartment of said pair of pole compartments; the arc extinguishing chamber of each of the contiguous compartments of said pair of pole compartments including an inlet opening outwardly from a side of the compartment where the contact parts are located, the inlet being confined in one direction by said lower arcing horn, said lower arcing horn being located to receive a foot of an electrical arc at its entry into the chamber; and wherein the aperture is located and has dimensions such that the lower arcing horns in the contiguous compartments of said pair of pole compartments are located facing one another on each side of the aperture.
- 2. A circuit breaker comprising: an insulating case;at least one pair of contiguous pole compartments, the contiguous compartments of said pair of pole compartments being separated from one another by a partition wall and juxtaposed inside said insulating case; an arc extinguishing chamber located in each of the contiguous compartments of said pair of pole compartments; a first pair of separable contact parts located in one of the contiguous compartments of said pair of pole compartments; a second pair of separable contact parts located in the other of the contiguous compartments of said pair of pole compartments; an operating mechanism linked to the first and second pairs of separable contact parts to cause the first and second pairs of contact parts to separate simultaneously; means for electrically connecting in parallel each contact part of the first pair of separable contact parts with a corresponding contact part of the second pair of separable contact parts, and forming a single pole of ultimate breaking capacity lcu for a voltage vcu and power factor kcu; a lower arcing horn located in each contiguous compartment of said pair of pole compartments; the arc extinguishing chamber of each of the contiguous compartments of said pair of pole compartments including an inlet opening outwardly from a side of the compartment where the contact parts are located, the inlet being confined in one direction by said lower arcing horn, said lower arcing horn being located to receive a foot of an electrical arc at its entry into the chamber; and at least one communicating aperture located in the partition wall, said aperture having dimensions and a location such that, when a current of an intensity equal to 50% of the ultimate breaking capacity lcu of the pole for a voltage vcu and power factor kcu flows through the pole, the ratio of the arcing energy in one of the contiguous compartments of said pair of pole compartments to the other of the contiguous compartments of said pair of pole compartments is greater than ⅙, the arcing energy being measured for each compartment by the integral W=∫to14v(t).i(t)dt where: W is the integral measuring the arcing energy, v(t) is the instantaneous value of the voltage at the terminals of the contact parts, i(t) is the instantaneous value of the current intensity flowing through the contact parts, t0 is the time when separation of the contact parts begins, t4 is the time when the current intensity flowing through the contact parts ceases; and wherein the aperture is located and has dimensions such that the lower arcing horns in the contiguous compartments of said pair of pole compartments are located facing one another on each side of the aperture.
- 3. The circuit breaker according to claim 1 or 2, wherein the aperture is located close to a zone of each compartment of said pair of compartments where an arc is drawn when the contact parts separate.
- 4. The circuit break according to claim 1 or 2, whereinan upper arcing horn is arranged in each of the contiguous compartments of said pair of compartments, said upper arcing horn facing the lower arcing horn so that the inlet of the extinguishing chamber is confined between the lower and upper arcing horns, said upper arcing horn being designed to receive a head of the electrical arc at its entry into the chamber; and the aperture is located and has dimensions such that a zone situated between the lower arcing horn and the upper arcing horn of one of said compartments, is facing a zone located between the lower arcing horn and the upper arcing horn of the other one of said compartments on each side of the aperture.
- 5. The circuit breaker according to claim 1, wherein the opening of the aperture in each compartment is located close to a contact zone of the pairs of separable contact parts, where the separable contact parts contact each other.
- 6. The circuit breaker according to claim 1, whereinone contact part of each pair of contact parts is movable between a closed position, in which the contact part is in contact with the other contact part of the same pair of contact parts, and an open position, and comprises a front end on which the head of an electrical arc is located when separation of the contact parts takes place; and the dimensions of the aperture are such that the front end of the movable contact part in one of the compartments of said pair of compartments is facing the front end of the movable contact part in the other compartment of said pair of compartments, in both the closed position and in the open position.
- 7. The circuit breaker according to claim 1, wherein each pair of separable contact parts comprises a stationary contact part, the aperture being located close to the stationary contact part in each compartment.
- 8. The circuit breaker according to claim 1 or 2, wherein the partition wall has a high dielectric strength.
- 9. The circuit breaker according to claim 2, wherein the opening of the aperture in each compartment is located close to a contact zone of the first and second pairs of separable contact parts, where the separable contact parts contact each other.
- 10. The circuit breaker according to claim 2, whereinone contact part of each of said first and second pairs of contact parts is movable between a closed position, in which the contact part is in contact with the other contact part of the same pair of contact parts, and an open position, and comprises a front end at which the head of an electrical arc is located when separation of the contact parts takes place; and the dimensions of the aperture are such that the front end of the movable contact part in one of the contiguous compartments of said pair of compartments is facing the front end of the movable contact part in the other compartment of said pair of compartments, in both the closed position and in the open position.
- 11. The circuit breaker according to claim 2, wherein each of said first and second pairs of separable contact parts comprises a stationary contact part, the aperture being located close to the stationary contact part in each compartment.
Priority Claims (1)
Number |
Date |
Country |
Kind |
98 06206 |
May 1998 |
FR |
|
US Referenced Citations (6)
Foreign Referenced Citations (3)
Number |
Date |
Country |
0322321 |
Jun 1989 |
EP |
0320412 |
Jun 1989 |
EP |
0437151 |
Jul 1991 |
EP |