The invention concerns a circuit breaker comprising two polarities each including two poles connected in parallel, each pole having a switch and a tripping device.
Some circuit breakers for direct current have poles in parallel, in order to increase the maximum use of current. Such a circuit breaker comprises two polarities each including two poles connected in parallel. Each pole has a tripping device, which can operate by overload and/or by short circuit, that is suited to detecting a current greater than half the total maximum current beyond which the circuit breaker is activated. Each pole likewise comprises a switch connected in series with the tripping device, this switch providing for the current to flow as a result of contact between conductive portions.
When two poles or more are connected in parallel, the current is distributed between these poles in a manner inversely proportional to the resistance of these poles. The resistance of a pole includes the resistance of all of the conductive portions and the contact resistance of the switch. The resistance of the conductive portions is very invariable, because it is dependent only on the resistivity of the materials, which has little scatter, and on the geometry of the portions, the tolerances of which are under control. The contact resistance, on the other hand, is subject to variations that may be substantial, owing to the electrical arcs that affect the surface of the fixed and mobile contacts both under continuous load and in the case of a short circuit. Therefore, the resistance of the two poles in parallel may be substantially different. A current of greater intensity will therefore naturally flow in the pole that has the lowest resistance, with the risk of causing the circuit breaker to trip for an excessively low total current value. The reason is that it is possible for the current flowing in the pole with the lowest resistance to exceed half the maximum current intensity, or the total current intensity is lower than the maximum current intensity. The circuit breaker therefore cannot perform its function satisfactorily and can cause untimely power cuts.
These are disadvantages that the invention aims to overcome by proposing a novel circuit breaker with poles connected in parallel, in which the distribution of the current in the poles is under better control and which avoids untimely tripping.
To this end, the invention concerns a circuit breaker comprising two polarities each including two poles connected in parallel, each pole having a switch and a tripping device. This circuit breaker is characterized in that each of the polarities has an equalizer electrically connecting the link between the switch and the tripping device of a first pole and the link between the switch and the tripping device of the second pole.
By virtue of the invention, the distribution of the current between the poles is affected in practice only by the difference in the resistance of the tripping devices. In point of fact, these tripping devices are made up of conductive portions of known resistance, and the resistance differences between the tripping elements are negligible in practice. The current imbalances between the poles connected in parallel are therefore small, which minimizes the risks of the circuit breaker tripping for excessively low total current values.
According to advantageous but non-obligatory aspects of the invention, such a circuit breaker can incorporate one or more of the following features, taken in any technically admissible combination:
The invention will be better understood and other advantages thereof will emerge more clearly in light of the description that follows for a circuit breaker in accordance with the principle thereof, which is provided with reference to the appended drawings, in which:
The object of the invention is to prevent variations in the contact resistances of the switches 9 from causing imbalances in the intensity of the current in the tripping devices 7 of two poles of one and the same polarity. To this end, the poles 3 and 5 are connected, between the tripping device 7 and the switch 9, by an equalizer 13 electrically connecting the link between the tripping device 7 and the switch 9 of the pole 3, and the link between the tripping device 7 and the switch 9 of the pole 5. The link between the switch 9 and the tripping device 7 of the pole 3 is represented by the point P1 in
The equalizer 13 allows the potentials of the points P1 and P2 to be made equal. Thus, the distribution of the current in the switches 9 does not affect the distribution of the currents in the tripping devices 7. Moreover, the resistances of the tripping devices 7 are equivalent to the resistances of the conductive portions making up the tripping devices 7, and the resistance of these portions is known and well under control. The distribution of the intensity of the current in the respective tripping devices 7 of the poles 3 and 5 is therefore substantially equal, which prevents the circuit breaker 1 from tripping for intensity current values below the maximum tripping current value.
In theory, the resistance of the equalizers 13 must be zero for the balance of the intensities in the tripping devices 7 of the poles 3 and 5 connected in parallel to be perfect, but this condition is impossible to produce. In practice, it suffices for the value of the resistance of the equalizer 13 to be no more than of the same order of magnitude as the resistance of the tripping devices 7 of the poles 3 and 5 connected in parallel in order for the balance of the currents to be significantly improved. Same order of magnitude is intended to be understood to mean that the value of the resistance of the equalizer 13 is less than approximately three times that of the resistance of the tripping devices 7. By way of example, if the resistance of the tripping devices 7 is 25 micro-Ohms, the resistance of the equalizers 13 must be less than 75 micro-Ohms. The lower the resistance of the equalizer 13 in comparison with the resistance of the tripping device 7, the better the balance of the currents will be. Preferably, the value of the resistance of the equalizer 13 must be lower than the value of the resistance of the tripping devices 7.
As shown in
In the embodiment of
A preferred embodiment of the invention is shown in
A second and a third embodiment of the invention are shown in
In the embodiment of
In the embodiment of
According to an embodiment that is not shown, the equalizers 13 can likewise be produced in the form of cables or of braids of conductive wires.
The features of the embodiments and variants described above can be combined in order to create new embodiments of the invention.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
14 58539 | Sep 2014 | FR | national |