The present disclosure relates to strain gages and more particularly, to strain gages including creep compensation.
Strain gage based transducers are used in a variety of applications to convert mechanical inputs (for example, weight, force, mass, torque, pressure, deflection/displacement) into an electrical output. The basis for all such devices is the same. Specifically, a mechanical reaction device (commonly called a spring or counterforce) is designed to respond to the specific input, transducing the input into a measurable surface strain, which changes proportionally with the applied input. Strain gages attached to the transducer counterforce sense and respond to this surface strain with a change in electrical resistance. The counterforce is normally machined from high-quality tool steel (e.g., 4340 or 4140), or highly processed (hardened/heat treated) stainless steel (e.g., 17-4 PH or 17-7 PH), or high-grade, heat treated aluminum (e.g., 2024-T351 or 2024-T81), or other excellent spring materials like beryllium copper or N-Span C. However, there are special cases where polymers are used (e.g., epoxy-glass laminate, or cast/injection molded plastics), and where ceramic materials are used (e.g., Al2O3 99+ percent). In fact, over the course of transducer history, practically every conceivable material has been used at one time or another as the basis for a counterforce. The present invention is not limited to any one material or even to a class of materials; it works well with any material selected for use as a counterforce.
In all cases, strain gage based transducers are used to convert physical loads or inputs into electrical outputs. Achieving the highest level of transducer accuracy requires compensating the device for certain accuracy-limiting effects; some of which are inherent to the strain gage/transducer system, like creep, and some of which are external effects, like changes in temperature, and some of which are a combination, like creep change with temperature, called creep TC. As an example, load cells are used in the weighing industry as transducers to convert a weight (mass/force) into a proportional electrical signal. The load cell is designed mechanically to provide repeatable and quasi-equal-magnitude surface strains at specific points, whereby two of the strains are tensile (positive) and two are compressive (negative). Electrical resistance strain gages bonded at these points convert the surface strains resulting from an applied weight into a proportional electrical signal. The strain gages are connected into an electrical circuit, typically a Wheatstone bridge, which optimizes the output signal.
In the Wheatstone bridge electrical circuit typically used in transducers, four strain gages, plus a power source, are wired together in the series/parallel circuit as depicted in
Within the weighing industry there is a class of load cells used in applications called legal-for-trade. These legal-for-trade load cells must pass stringent qualification tests from internationally recognized standards, such as OIML R60 (Organization Internationale de Metrologie Legal). Results from these tests classify the load cell over a specified temperature range (normally −10 to +40° C.) based upon achievable resolution of weight. The classification metric used is divisions of resolution. For example, a load cell having a maximum combined error of 0.033% is classified as 3000D (3000 divisions) accuracy.
Several factors conspire to affect the classification category of a load cell, including the mechanical design and production of the load cell body, and performance characteristics of the strain gage and its installation. Among the strain gage performance parameters, creep is critical to load cell classification. Ignoring all other error contributions, the allowable cord-slope creep within the example classification (3000D) is 0.0233% FS/min. (percent full-scale per minute).
Transducer creep is defined as a changing output with a stable physical condition or input (weight, in the case of the load cell example) under steady state environmental conditions. Strain gages are custom designed to compensate for the inherent material creep of specific transducer designs. A representative plot of creep for the load cell example is shown in
Several variables affect strain gage creep, including but not limited to, the resistive material (electrical conductor) from which the strain gage is produced, geometry (e.g., gage length, cross-section dimensions, end loop size, shape, and orientation), construction (materials used in building the gage, including insulating backing and insulating overlay, if present), and installation (thickness and type of cement, gage positioning). The most common type strain gage used in transducers is the thin, metal-foil variety, depicted schematically in
Prior methods allow for convenient control of transducer creep at room temperature to about 0.0175%/min of rated full-scale output; or, when calculating from OIML R60 for the load cell example, a little over 4000D. One prior method of achieving creep compensation is to select the strain gage end loops (K in
A subtle variation on the above mentioned prior method of creep compensation is to pick end loop lengths for the strain gages slightly different from one another. With this method, there may be three strain gages with equal end loop lengths and one different; or, two gages with equal end loop lengths and the other two equal, but different from the first two; or, all gages may have a slightly different end loop length. This minor difference of creeping characteristic is achieved using what might be referred to as nearly identical strain gages. This practice primarily evolved from the practical concern over what gages happened to be on-hand when building the transducer, and happen to combine for a low creep result; that is, the method evolved naturally because of inventory practicality. While achieving an excellent creep result at one temperature is possible using the method, it does not, however, necessarily provide any improvement in creep TC performance over the more commonly practiced use of identical strain gages.
Another method of achieving transducer creep compensation has been suggested, whereby the overall stiffness of the strain gage is altered by varying the amount of reinforcing fibers mixed with the backing resin. This method is grounded in the relationship between creep and the relative stiffness difference between the counterforce and the strain gage. One obvious limitation with this technique is its applicability only to mixed-resin backing systems, which is not the dominant type used within the industry.
Achieving high resolution creep compensation over the entire −10 to +40° C. temperature range is a challenging aspect of these prior methods. In another method, various electrical configurations are designed into the strain gage circuit and are formed with the strain gage grids at the time of etching. These configurations are initially electrically inert, but when subsequently introduced into the circuit as active elements by cutting appropriate electrical shunts, the transducer can be creep compensated, including any variation in creeping caused by a change in temperature. This work is performed after the gage has been installed on the transducer. Disadvantages of this method are 1) more complex and costly strain gage design and production; and, 2) careful and selective ‘trimming’ of the creep characteristic in situ.
It is known that strain gage creep, as exhibited by transducer output, is a viscoelastic phenomenon, as illustrated in
Thus, the prior methods have embraced a common result, where creep compensation is achieved via physical cancelling (viz., the positive counterforce creep is countered by the combined negative tension/compression strain gage creep), but it has not addressed the problem through electrical cancelling as disclosed herein.
Disclosed herein is new methodology for selecting and properly placing foil strain gages on a transducer in the Wheatstone bridge, which provides a more consistent creep response, especially when the transducer temperature is changed. An especially advantageous transducer counterforce is the so called binocular or reverse-bending design, whereby two locations on the counterforce have small areas of concentrated tension strain and two locations have small areas of concentrated compression strain. Coincidentally, there is one each of the two opposite strains on the top and one each of the two opposite strains on the bottom of the counterforce. Strain gages with the appropriate creeping characteristic, as disclosed herein, are attached to the counterforce at these four locations; tension strain gages attached over the tension areas and compression strain gages attached over the compression areas. This counterforce design is particularly attractive because effects from temperature gradients along the length of the counterforce, not necessarily associated with creeping, are naturally compensated by the bridge circuit.
Prior methods for correction of transducer creep relied on precisely matching the inherent positive creep of deadweight loaded transducers to an equal negative creep by the strain gages; thus, a balance is struck between the two independent creeps [transducer creep+(combined creep of the four strain gages)=0], resulting in a steady transducer output with time. Intrinsic to this correction is that total creep from the four strain gages is matched to compensate the transducer creep, without concern for relative creep matching between the strain gages (all gages are chosen equal or nearly equal). By default, this requires that the combined strain gage creep be opposite in sign to the transducer creep.
The techniques disclosed herein use the electrical nature of the Wheatstone bridge circuit. Referring to
For example, it is only necessary to choose compression strain gages with significant positive creeping, and then match the tension strain gages with equal positive creeping. There is no further need to pick strain gages with creeping precisely matched, but opposite in sign, to the transducer counterforce.
An advantageous embodiment of this structure is stable transducer creep performance when the transducer temperature is changed from that at which initial creep correction is accomplished (improved creep TC); for example, over the entire legal-for-trade temperature range of −10 to +40° C. When choosing tension strain gages with matching positive creep to the compression strain gages [by choosing tension strain gages with much shorter end loops than those used for compression strain gages—one-half the length (50%), for example], then the creep change with temperature can be made equal between tension and compression strain gages and the creep signal component at any temperature is cancelled in the Wheatstone bridge. This advantageous embodiment is made possible because of the similar creep TC characteristic obtained when strain gages are properly selected for positive tension and compression creeping, as opposed to the selection of identical or nearly identical strain gages using prior methodology, where the tension and compression strain gages exhibit different creep TC characteristics.
A more detailed understanding may be had from the following description, given by way of example in conjunction with the accompanying drawings:
FIG. 1′ is a graph showing typical transducer creep;
a is a graph showing a representative plot of creep for a load cell;
b is a graph showing physical creep cancellation action;
a is a drawing of a binocular transducer showing the location of the various electrical connections (1, 2, 3, 4);
b is Wheatstone bridge electrical circuit coupled to the transducer of
The strain gages are fixed to the counterforce, such as by an adhesive, direct lamination or some other process, and are wired into a Wheatstone bridge circuit as illustrated in
In the prior methods, creep compensation is effected by the physical relaxation of the strain gages countering the physical extension of the counterforce. Since the strain gages relax at the same rate as the counterforce is extending, there is no change in electrical resistance of the strain gages and no change in output signal from the Wheatstone bridge. This physical creep cancellation action is depicted in
In contrast to prior methods of physical creep correction, this disclosure is directed to the use of the summing characteristic of the Wheatstone bridge to achieve creep correction electrically. By adjusting the strain gage creeping characteristic such that the creep strain signal is equal in magnitude and of the same sign between the tension and compression strain gages, then when these equal creep signals are combined in the bridge (for strain gages 1 and 2), and for strain gages 3 and 4), the resultant is zero and the creep signal is electrically cancelled.
As previously indicated, an advantage of this matching of creep strain signal, and an important improvement is that by correctly accomplishing the strain gage creep matching, creep TC is also improved. In one example, the matching is accomplished by using a very long end loop configuration for the compression strain gages, relative to the tension strain gages. Specifically, when the web thickness, F, in
Using the above example, a plot of the resulting transducer creep TC, which by default includes room temperature creep, is shown in
The present invention has the additional benefit that is compatible with and can be combined in the same transducer with the prior methods to almost completely eliminate creep TC. Specifically, prior methods utilize strain gages so that the combined tension/compression strain gage creep cancels the physical creep of the transducer element and the present invention selects strain gages so that the positive and negative creeping characteristic cancel each other. By combining physical and electrical cancellation, the variation of creep with temperature is almost completely eliminated as illustrated in
It will be understood by those of skill in the art that the present invention cancels only the variable component know generally as creep and that the desired measurement the transducer is not cancelled.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/229,123 filed Jul. 28, 2009, which is incorporated by reference as if fully set forth.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3949603 | Laimins | Apr 1976 | A |
4951765 | Naito et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
5031463 | Hess | Jul 1991 | A |
5308931 | Griffen | May 1994 | A |
5629489 | Hipkiss et al. | May 1997 | A |
5847290 | Kim | Dec 1998 | A |
7024315 | Giurgiutiu | Apr 2006 | B2 |
20020050174 | Valdevit et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020083578 | Naito et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20050109124 | Greszczuk | May 2005 | A1 |
20050132820 | Eilersen | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050211003 | Yoshikuwa | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060248961 | Shachar et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060288795 | Kieffer et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070245840 | Wendelbo et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080236300 | Mueck et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080262774 | Fasig et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090057038 | Kusumoto | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20100313668 | Tao et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110023630 | Zandman et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2000-275116 | Oct 2000 | JP |
2003-322571 | Nov 2003 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110023630 A1 | Feb 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61229123 | Jul 2009 | US |