This application claims the priority benefit of French Application for Patent No. 1756437, filed on Jul. 7, 2017, the content of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety to the maximum extent allowable by law.
The present description generally relates to electronic circuits and, more particularly, to a circuit for protecting a power switch from overloads. The present description applies more particularly to a power supply switch for switching the supply of power to a DC load.
Electronic power switches (for example, MOS power transistors) produced using semiconductor materials are widely used to control the supply of power to loads from a DC power supply source, for example a battery. In an electrical network supplied with power by a battery, for example the electrical network of an automotive vehicle, numerous power switches are found which serve to supply power to multiple loads. The power switches, associated with the loads that they control, are connected in parallel on one or more power lines conveying the DC current.
In order to protect the power switches from potential DC overloads, each switch or group of switches is generally associated with a circuit for protection from an overcurrent in the event that the load is shorted.
One embodiment overcomes drawbacks associated with circuits for protecting power switches from overloads.
One embodiment proposes an overload detection circuit.
One embodiment proposes a solution that is particularly suitable for protecting MOS power transistors.
One embodiment proposes a solution that is particularly simple and compatible with conventional overload detectors.
In an embodiment, a circuit for protecting at least one switch linked to a power supply rail comprises: a first circuit for detecting an overload across the terminals of the switch with respect to a first threshold; and a second circuit for adjusting the value of the first threshold according to variations in a supply voltage.
According to one embodiment, the second circuit includes: a comparator for comparing information representative of the supply voltage with at least a first level; and at least a first element for validating the result of the comparison over at least a first duration for a modulation of the first threshold.
According to one embodiment, said first duration is longer than the duration of transient variations in the supply voltage.
According to one embodiment, the second circuit additionally includes a second element for validating the result of the comparison over a second duration.
One embodiment provides a control module, comprising: at least one switch for controlling a load; and at least one protection circuit.
According to one embodiment, the protection circuit modulates a control signal for controlling the switch in order to regulate the current that flows therethrough in the on state.
According to one embodiment, the first circuit for detecting an overload includes an element for comparing information representative of the current in the switch with said first threshold.
These features and advantages, and others, will be described in detail in the following non-limiting description of particular embodiments, which is given with reference to the appended figures, in which:
The same elements have been referenced by the same references in the various figures which, in particular for the timing diagrams, have been drawn without attention to scale. In particular, the structural and/or functional elements common to the different embodiments may have the same references and may have identical structural, dimensional and material properties.
For the sake of clarity, only those steps and elements which are of use in understanding the described embodiments have been shown and will be described in detail. In particular, the circuits or the loads controlled by power switches, and protected by protection circuits such as described, have not been described in detail, the embodiments described being compatible with the conventional applications.
Unless otherwise indicated, when reference is made to two interconnected elements, this means directly connected with no intermediate element other than conductors, and when reference is made to two interlinked elements, this means that these two elements may be directly linked (connected) or linked via one or more other elements.
Throughout the following description, unless specified otherwise, the expressions “approximately”, “substantially” and “of the order of” signify to within 10%, preferably to within 5%.
Hereinafter, an exemplary application to the field of automotive vehicles and to the DC electrical networks thereof, supplied with DC power from one or more batteries, is considered. However, all that which is described hereinafter is more generally applicable to any electrical network in which similar problems arise.
In an automotive vehicle, one or more batteries 10 (BAT) are connected to power supply buses consisting of a bus 12 at a positive potential with respect to a reference potential, and a reference or ground bus 14 that is connected to the chassis of the vehicle. Various electrical loads 16 (LOAD) are linked, via control circuit modules 2, to the power supply buses 12 and 14. Each module 2 includes one or more power switches for controlling the corresponding load. The loads are, for example, starter circuits, engine management circuits (ignition, injection), various computers, lighting and signaling circuits, motor power supply circuits (windscreen wipers, windscreen washers, seats, etc.), comfort and accessory circuits (heating, ventilation, central locking, etc.), etc. The switches of the control circuit modules 2 are controlled manually or from a central control unit (CTRL) 18.
The assembly of the loads 16 and their respective switching operations lead to electrical disruptions on the power supply buses 12 and 14. In particular, the operations of switching the various loads lead to overvoltages at the level of the various modules and loads that are linked to the buses 12 and 14.
The control circuit modules 2 are generally provided with circuits for protection from potential overloads in the on state in order to prevent the destruction of the power switches as a result of overheating. Specifically, the overvoltages that are liable to occur on the power supply buses 12 and 14 may reach hundreds of volts while the nominal DC operating voltage is of the order of 12 or 15 V. Provision is made for limiting the current in the power switch of the module in order to decrease the power and prevent its destruction. In order to achieve this, each switch or group of switches is associated with a protection circuit, the function of which is to decrease the control voltage of the switch in order to decrease its current.
It is assumed that the power switch 21 is an MOS power transistor. The transistor 21 is in series with the load 16 that it controls between the buses 12 and 14 applying a battery voltage Vbat (i.e., a DC supply voltage). The gate 23 of the transistor 21 is connected at the output of a control circuit 25 (DRIVER). Depending on the type of load 16, the circuit 25 controls the switch 21 in “all-or-nothing” mode or in a variable mode by adjusting the gate voltage of the transistor 21. The circuit 25 receives a manual or electrical setpoint from the circuit 18.
The role of the protection circuit 3 is to modulate the gate voltage 23 of the transistor 21 according to the drain-source voltage across the terminals of this transistor 21. In one simplified embodiment, this modulation is an “all-or-nothing” modulation, i.e. the circuit 3 forces the transistor 21 to turn off in the event of an overvoltage across its terminals. Preferably, the modulation of the gate voltage of the transistor 21 is analog or gradual (stepwise). In order to achieve this, the protection circuit 3 includes a switch 31, typically an MOS transistor, linking the gate 23 and source 27 of the transistor 21. The role of the transistor 31 is, when it is on, to decrease the gate-source voltage (Vgs) of the transistor 21 in order to decrease its drain-source current (Ids) and, thus decrease the power dissipated in its drain-source resistor in the on state. The transistor 31 is controlled, for example, by a comparator 33 (COMP) for comparing information representative of the drain-source current of the transistor 21 with a threshold TH. A first terminal of the comparator 33 is connected to the midpoint 35 of an association of an MOS transistor 36 in series with a resistor 37 in series between the drain and source of the transistor 21, i.e. between the bus 12 and the source 27. A second terminal of the comparator 33 receives the comparison threshold TH of the voltage of point 35. When the voltage of point 35 exceeds the threshold TH, the output of the comparator 33 switches so as to turn the transistor 31 on. The drain-source resistance when the transistor 31 is in the on state determines the decrease in the gate-source voltage of the transistor 21, hence of the current in the module 2.
The circuit of
Limiting or interrupting the current of the transistor 21 when an increase in the voltage is detected may prove to be problematic when the decrease in the current is dependent on the DC supply voltage. Specifically, if the current drawn by the module decreases, this causes, due to the non-negligible line inductance of the buses 12 and 14, an increase in the voltage Vbat. Consequently, this increase risks causes a new decrease in the current or interrupting other modules and so on in a snowball effect.
Furthermore, various phenomena may be the cause of an overvoltage. For example, in the event of a short circuit at the level of the load 16 controlled by the switch 21, the current in the switch 21 suddenly increases, as does the voltage across its terminals. Another possible situation is an overvoltage at the level of the bus 12. Such an overvoltage may be due to switching other loads connected to the network, in particular due to the inductive behavior of the aforementioned network.
The protection of a module on a heavily disrupted network, such as the electrical network of a vehicle, must adhere to multiple constraints. Besides not being sensitive to the oscillations of the DC supply voltage Vbat that are due to the operations of switching the various modules, the protection must not be triggered by transient phenomena such as, for example, sudden temporary increases linked to inrush currents when certain loads are powered up.
Typically, in the example of application to an electrical network of a vehicle supplied with power by a battery having a nominal DC voltage of 12 V, standards set operating ranges in which the loads must be able to be switched and acceptable durations of transient phenomena. For example, it must be possible to switch on a load under a voltage that may reach approximately 16 V. Moreover, it must be possible to switch on a load with inrush currents reaching around 10 times the value of the nominal current of the load.
According to one embodiment, provision is made for modifying the trigger threshold TH in order to take these constraints into account.
In the example of
The representation of
The circuit 4 of
In the example of
The output of the comparator 41 delivers a digital signal, having two levels in the example of
As a variant, the low-pass filter function 45 may be carried out by a timer at the output of the comparator 41. The output of this timer then switches only if the output of the comparator 41 indicates that the threshold REF has been exceeded for a duration that is longer than a reference duration TREF, the timer being reset as soon as the output of the comparator 41 switches to the rest state. The duration TREF is chosen according to the transient disruptions that are desired not to be taken into account. By way of particular exemplary embodiment, the duration TREF is of a few microseconds and the duration T48 is of the order of a few tens of microseconds.
In the presence of overvoltages of short duration (for example between times t1 and t2) above a nominal DC voltage of the battery, i.e. having a duration that is shorter than the time constant of the filter 45, nothing happens at the output of the comparator 41.
If the overvoltage (for example from a time t3) about the nominal DC voltage of the battery lasts for a sufficiently long time, i.e. more than the time constant TREF introduced by the filter 45, the S “set” input of the flip-flop 47 is activated (time t4) at the end of time TREF and its output OV switches (arbitrarily to the high state).
When the overvoltage ends (time t5), the timer 48 is triggered and, if the overvoltage does not reoccur before the timeout T48 has expired, the flip-flop 47 is reset (time t6).
The signal OV is used to adjust the value of the threshold TH (
According to another embodiment, the circuit 4 is used directly as a protection circuit for switching the transistor 31 of
According to another embodiment, provision is made for multiple voltage references to which various levels of decreasing the current in the transistor 21 are assigned. For example, the value of the current is divided by two between 16 and 20 V, then by four beyond 20 V. In order to achieve this, the transistor 31 is controlled in an analog manner.
One advantage of the embodiments described is that it is now possible:
Another advantage is that the overvoltage detection and protection circuit may be integrated with the transistor 21 in the switching module 2.
Another advantage is that the proposed solution may be implemented at the level of each module 2 (
Particular embodiments have been described. Diverse variants and modifications will be apparent to those skilled in the art. In particular, the choice of durations TREF and T48 depend on the application and may vary. These durations may even vary from one module to another. Furthermore, the described detection function may be implemented in an analogue, digital or mixed manner. Moreover, although a solution in which the control modules are directly connected to one of the power supply rails has been described, certain modules may be linked thereto via other elements, for example, between two loads connected to the power supply rails. Additionally, the case of a power switch connected to the positive power supply rail has been taken as an example, but all that has been described is easily transferable to modules having power switches that are connected to the negative or reference rail.
It should be noted that a person skilled in the art could combine various elements of these various embodiments and variants without exercising inventive skill. Lastly, the implementation of the embodiments that have been described is within the scope of a person skilled in the art on the basis of the functional information given above and by using circuits that are conventional per se.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1756437 | Jul 2017 | FR | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4745299 | Eng | May 1988 | A |
5055703 | Schornack | Oct 1991 | A |
5440441 | Ahuja | Aug 1995 | A |
5629542 | Sakamoto | May 1997 | A |
5629610 | Pedrazzini | May 1997 | A |
5898238 | Dombrowski | Apr 1999 | A |
5963439 | Wuidart | Oct 1999 | A |
6137267 | Kates | Oct 2000 | A |
6150802 | Andrews | Nov 2000 | A |
6242895 | Fujii | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6249409 | Bienvenu | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6483376 | Bienvenu | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6487059 | Bontempo | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6518731 | Thomas | Feb 2003 | B2 |
7230813 | Canova | Jun 2007 | B1 |
7825645 | Bailly | Nov 2010 | B2 |
8144444 | Horsky | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8537517 | Banak | Sep 2013 | B1 |
8547675 | Maier | Oct 2013 | B2 |
9866009 | Oka | Jan 2018 | B2 |
9954548 | Illing | Apr 2018 | B2 |
10164424 | Koh | Dec 2018 | B2 |
10170905 | Illing | Jan 2019 | B2 |
10298251 | Illing | May 2019 | B2 |
10734799 | Costa | Aug 2020 | B2 |
20020044463 | Bontempo | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020149415 | Bienvenu | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030179033 | Bienvenu | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040046614 | Pigott | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040150928 | Goodfellow | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20050270807 | Strijker | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060291258 | Zhu | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20080212248 | Zhu | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20090027020 | Qiu | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090058574 | Stiedl | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090147423 | Mulligan | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20120081092 | Pavlin | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20140055119 | Bienvenu | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20170288662 | Djelassi | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20180090924 | Djelassi | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20200067503 | Bienvenu | Feb 2020 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0678751 | Apr 1995 | EP |
2895115 | Jun 2007 | FR |
2014199100 | Dec 2014 | WO |
2017062715 | Apr 2017 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Office Action 1 for co-pending EP Appl. No. 18180160.6 dated Feb. 7, 2019 (5 pages). |
Office Action 2 for co-pending EP Appl. No. 18180160.6 dated Mar. 28, 2019 (3 pages). |
Office Action 3 for co-pending EP Appl. No. 18180160.6 dated Jun. 19, 2019 (7 pages). |
INPI Search Report and Written Opinion for FR 1756437 dated May 14, 2018 (10 pages). |
Fourth Office Action for co-pending EP Appl. No. 18180160.6 dated Jan. 30, 2020 (4 pages). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190013804 A1 | Jan 2019 | US |