1. Field of the Invention
The present invention generally relates to the control of a bidirectional switch by a control circuit, such as a microprocessor, in the case where the control circuit is not referenced to the same reference voltage as the bidirectional switch control terminal.
2. Discussion of the Related Art
As illustrated in
Although galvanic isolation circuit 1 is illustrated in
Generally, a galvanic isolation circuit is an expensive circuit and often impossible to integrate.
An object of the present invention thus is to provide control of a bidirectional switch, and more specifically a bidirectional switch controllable with a current, by a control circuit not referenced to the same reference voltage as the switch to be controlled, without it being necessary to use a galvanic isolation circuit.
A more specific object of the present invention is to provide a circuit for controlling an electromagnetic relay.
To achieve these and other objects, the present invention provides a circuit for controlling a bidirectional switch referenced to a first reference voltage with a control circuit supplied by a first voltage and referenced to a second reference voltage. The supply voltage of the control circuit is connected by a diode to a coupling circuit comprising a node, this node being connected:
According to an embodiment of the present invention, the collector of the second transistor is connected to the control terminal of the bidirectional switch via a control current limiting resistor.
The present invention also aims at a circuit for controlling an electromagnetic relay of control of a load with an A.C. voltage, comprising a transformer which supplies, on the one hand, a control coil in series with a current-controlled bidirectional switch and, on the other hand, via a rectifier, a circuit for controlling said switch, in which the coupling between the control circuit and the bidirectional switch is such as mentioned hereabove.
The foregoing objects, features and advantages of the present invention will be discussed in detail in the following non-limiting description of specific embodiments in connection with the accompanying drawings.
The present invention provides a coupling circuit 10 comprising an NPN transistor T1, the base of which receives the output of microprocessor μP, having its emitter connected to ground G1 and having its collector connected to supply voltage V1 via a resistor R1. A diode D1 is interposed between resistor R1 and supply voltage V1. The connection point of diode D1 and of resistor R1 forms a node 11 of the circuit. The collector of transistor T1 is connected via a resistor R2 to the base of a PNP transistor T2 having its emitter connected to a node 11. To this node 11 is also connected a first terminal of a capacitor C having its second terminal connected to second reference voltage G2. The collector of transistor T2 is connected, preferably via a small resistor R3, to the gate of triac TR.
The operation of coupling circuit 10 is the following. When the microprocessor sends a turn-on order to triac TR, transistor T1 turns on, which causes the turning-on of transistor T2. Capacitor C, which has previously been charged, then discharges through transistor T2, resistor R3, and the gate circuit of triac TR towards second reference voltage G2, which turns on the triac. Resistor R3 is used to limit the control current, and is selected for the discharge duration of capacitor C to be sufficient, for example, so that the triac triggers even if the turn-on order arrives close to a zero crossing of the A.C. voltage applied to the load.
As illustrated in
The present invention is particularly advantageous in the case where a load is desired to be controlled via a relay.
Thus, conventionally, coil 23 is controlled in D.C. mode. This results in various disadvantages. Indeed, under a D.C. power supply, the coil impedance is as a first approximation reduced to its sole real part, that is, its resistance. Now, this resistance is generally small. The current necessary to obtain the required magnetic power required for an activation of relay 11 is then high, on the order of from 20 to 200 mA.
The higher the current intended to flow through the coil, the greater the dimensions of transformer T, which makes its integration difficult. This is enhanced by the fact that the power factor of a diode bridge conventionally is 0.5, whereby the apparent current is twice the active current.
Further, with a high coil current, losses by Joule effect in the windings are high.
Moreover, the higher the necessary current, the higher the capacitance of capacitor C2 must be to limit voltage variations. This leads to using a capacitance on the order of some hundred microfarads and thus a bulky capacitor.
Another disadvantage of such a control of a relay 21 with a D.C. current is the fact that, upon flowing of the D.C. current through coil 23, a magnetic field is created between coil 23 and switch 22 that it controls, which field disappears little after the turning-on with the current's stabilization. A specific device (not shown) for blocking switch 22 in the on position must then be provided.
The present invention provides modifying the conventional circuit of
Thus, the present invention provides, as shown in
Thus, the disadvantages of the state of the art are solved by means of a simple circuit. Indeed, coil 23 being supplied by an A.C. current, its impedance is higher than in the case where it is supplied by a D.C. current. To obtain the electromagnetic power required for a relay activation, the current in the coil may be lower. In practice, this current is reduced by a factor from 3 to 5. This enables reducing the dimension of transformer T and the capacitance of capacitor C2. The necessity of providing an additional device enabling blocking of the relay switch is thus eliminated.
The present invention has been generally discussed in relation with
The present invention also applies to the control of a voltage-controlled bidirectional switch.
Of course, the present invention is likely to have various alterations, modifications, and improvements which will readily occur to those skilled in the art. Such alterations, modifications, and improvements are intended to be part of this disclosure, and are intended to be within the spirit and the scope of the present invention. Accordingly, the foregoing description is by way of example only and is not intended to be limiting. The present invention is limited only as defined in the following claims and the equivalents thereto.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
02 16802 | Dec 2002 | FR | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3526809 | Obenhaus | Sep 1970 | A |
3547348 | Kruper | Dec 1970 | A |
3798462 | Rizzo | Mar 1974 | A |
3848140 | Guermeur et al. | Nov 1974 | A |
4336464 | Weber | Jun 1982 | A |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
31 48 115 | Sep 1982 | DE |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040160267 A1 | Aug 2004 | US |