Circuit method for reducing parasitic bipolar effects during electrostatic discharges

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6373104
  • Patent Number
    6,373,104
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, April 27, 2000
    24 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, April 16, 2002
    22 years ago
Abstract
A semiconductor device include a current source having a first node coupled to a first voltage reference node, and a second node for extracting a current in response to an electrostatic discharge (ESD) on a terminal. The device further includes a transistor having a well and a control electrode, a first current electrode coupled to a second voltage reference node, and a second current electrode coupled to the second node of the current source, and includes a resistive element is coupled to the terminal and the second node of the current source. The transistor of the semiconductor device is biased by detecting a positive voltage event (such as an ESD) at the first current electrode of the transistor, and biasing the first current electrode of the transistor in response to detecting the positive voltage event, wherein the biasing of the first current electrode is for preventing a forward biasing of an n-p junction associated with the transistor.
Description




FIELD OF THE INVENTION




The present invention generally relates to circuits, and more particularly, to a circuit and method for reducing parasitic bipolar effects during electrostatic discharges.




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




An integrated circuit or semiconductor device can be damaged when subjected to a voltage that is higher than the design voltage of the integrated circuit. Electrostatic discharge (“ESD”), originating from such sources as a mechanical chip carrier, a plastic chip storage device, or even a human being can generate a voltage that is many times greater than the design voltage of the integrated circuit. For example, the typical human body can supply an electrostatic discharge in excess of 4 kilovolts. For integrated circuits that operate at voltages of less than, for example, 5 volts, an electrostatic discharge of such proportions can be devastating.




In order to protect the internal circuitry from electrical overstress (EOS), or ESD, events, protection circuits are utilized, generally between the internal circuitry and the input/output (“I/O”) pins of the integrated circuit. One mechanism that can cause circuit failures during ESD events is a phenomenon known as “bipolar snapback”.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS




A better understanding of the present invention can be obtained when the following detailed description of a preferred embodiment is considered in conjunction with the following drawings, in which:





FIG. 1

illustrates, in partial schematic diagram form and partial cross-sectional view, a P-channel MOS transistor and an inherent parasitic bipolar transistor.





FIG. 2

illustrates a diagram of the snapback drain current versus drain voltage characteristics of the P-channel MOS transistor of

FIG. 1

in response to a negative ESD event.





FIG. 3

illustrates, in partial schematic diagram form and partial cross-sectional view, a tracking well P-channel MOS transistor and an inherent parasitic bipolar transistor.





FIG. 4

illustrates a diagram of the snapback drain current versus drain voltage characteristics of the tracking well P-channel MOS transistor of

FIG. 3

in response to a positive ESD event.





FIG. 5

illustrates in partial block diagram, partial schematic diagram form, an output buffer circuit


100


during an ESD event in accordance with the present invention.





FIG. 6

illustrates, in schematic diagram form, the output buffer circuit


100


of FIG.


5


.





FIG. 7

illustrates in partial block diagram, partial schematic diagram form, an input/output (I/O) buffer circuit


150


during an ESD event in accordance with the present invention.





FIG. 8

illustrates, in schematic diagram form, the ESD current source


166


of the I/O buffer circuit illustrated in FIG.


7


.




It will be appreciated that for simplicity and clarity of illustration, elements illustrated in the drawings have not necessarily been drawn to scale. For example, the dimensions of some of the elements are exaggerated relative to other elements for purposes of clarity. Further, where considered appropriate, reference numerals have been repeated among the drawings to represent corresponding or analogous elements.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF A PREFERRED EMBODIMENT





FIG. 1

illustrates, in partial schematic diagram form and partial cross-sectional view, a P-channel metal-oxide semiconductor (MOS) transistor


108


and an inherent parasitic PNP transistor


110


, which is composed of a lateral PNP transistor


110




a


and vertical PNP transistor


110




b


. As

FIG. 1

illustrates, the lateral PNP transistor


110




a


is formed in the n-well and having an emitter coupled to the source, a collector coupled to the drain, and a base coupled to the n-well of P-channel MOS transistor


108


. As

FIG. 1

also illustrates, the vertical PNP transistor


110




b


is formed having an emitter coupled to a source, a collector coupled to the P-substrate and a base coupled to the n-well of P-channel transistor


108


. Under bipolar snapback conditions, current flow in the lateral PNP transistor


110




a


often exceeds that in the vertical PNP transistor


110




b


. For the purpose of FIG.


1


and related figures, the lateral PNP transistor


110




a


can most influence the behavior or parasitic bipolar transistor


110


. Therefore, reference to the inherent PNP transistor


110


primarily refers to the lateral PNP transistor


110




a


. However, under other ESD conditions, the vertical PNP transistor


110




b


can play a significant role in conducting ESD current. In

FIG. 1

, the n-well tie and the source are illustrated coupled to a Vdd rail which becomes coupled to the ground during an ESD event, with the drain coupled to an I/O pad


102


. The I/O pad


102


is shown receiving a negative ESD event.




During bipolar snapback, the parasitic bipolar device formed by a p+ diffusion coupled to the bondpad (collector) and a p+ diffusion coupled to ground (emitter), can conduct large amounts of ESD discharge current by means of a self-biased mechanism through the inherent n-well resistance labeled “Rwell”. The self-biasing results from avalanche-breakdown at the collector/base (i.e. p+ pad to n-well) diffusion where avalanche-generated electron-hole pairs are created. The avalanche-generation source is shown schematically as current source I


GEN


in

FIG. 1

, which represents n-well (hole) current. The electrons generated from this effect migrate towards the n-well tie through the inherent n-well resistance, thereby producing a local reduction in the n-well potential near the transistor


108


. Once this potential falls below roughly negative 0.5V, for example, it is sufficient to forward bias the base-emitter junction (i.e. to n-well to p+) of the parasitic PNP device, thereby turning the device on. The drain-to-source voltage and drain current point at which parasitic bipolar action first occurs is called (V


T1


, I


T1


), where I


T1


is the current which is flowing due to the avalanche-generation at the drain/n-well junction. Usually, the bipolar device inherently contained in the P-channel MOS device of, for example, an output buffer is the most susceptible to snapback. This parasitic device is frequently the point of failure in a circuit subjected to an ESD event.





FIG. 2

illustrates a diagram of the snapback drain current versus drain-tosource voltage of the P-channel transistor of

FIG. 1

in response to a negative ESD event. When several PMOS transistors (or several fingers forming a single PMOS transistor) act as a parasitic bipolar device, the “snap-back” current-voltage characteristics of the inherent parasitic bipolar transistor is used. As stated above, a current begins to flow through the bipolar transistor at a certain collector-to-emitter voltage, V


T1


. Thereafter the magnitude collector-to- emitter voltage decreases as the magnitude of the current increases, “snapping back” from V


T1


. As the magnitude of the drain voltage increases, the trend reverses, causing the magnitude of the collector-to-emitter voltage to rise as the current also rises. Eventually, the bipolar transistor fails at another particular collector-to-emitter voltage V


T2


. The magnitude V


T2


is usually greater than the magnitude V


T1


since on-resistance exhibited by the transistor is quite high. The failure current is the second breakdown current, I


T2


, shown in FIG.


2


. The value of I


T2


must not be exceeded during an ESD event or else permanent damage will result in the device. In general, I


T2


depends on specific fabrication parameters of a particular technology, and varies from technology to technology.





FIG. 3

illustrates, in partial schematic diagram form and partial cross-sectional view, a tracking well P-channel metal-oxide semiconductor (MOS) transistor


156


and an inherent parasitic PNP transistor


160


, which is composed of a lateral PNP transistor


160




a


and a vertical PNP transistor


160




b


. As

FIG. 3

illustrates, the lateral PNP transistor


160




a


is formed in the n-well and having an emitter coupled to the drain, a collector coupled to the source, and a base coupled to the n-well of P-channel MOS transistor


156


. As

FIG. 3

also illustrates, the vertical PNP transistor


160




b


is formed having an emitter coupled to a drain, a collector coupled to the P-substrate and a base coupled to the n-well of P-channel transistor


156


. Under bipolar snapback conditions, current flow in the lateral PNP transistor


160




a


often exceeds that in the vertical PNP transistor


160




b


. For the purpose of FIG.


3


and related figures, the lateral PNP transistor


160




a


can most influence the behavior or parasitic bipolar transistor


160


. Therefore, reference to the inherent PNP transistor


160


primarily refers to the lateral PNP transistor


160




a


. However, under other ESD conditions, the vertical PNP transistor


160




b


can play a significant role in conducting ESD current. In

FIG. 3

, the source is illustrated coupled to a Vdd rail which becomes coupled to the ground during an ESD event, with the drain coupled to an I/O pad


152


. The n-well tie is coupled through a well pump


162


to the I/O pad


152


, and the gate is coupled through a gate pump


164


to the I/O pad


152


. The I/O pad


152


is shown receiving a positive ESD event.




During bipolar snapback, the parasitic bipolar device formed by a p+ diffusion coupled to the bondpad (emitter) and a p+ diffusion coupled to ground (collector), can conduct large amounts of ESD discharge current by means of a self-biased mechanism through the inherent n-well resistance labeled “Rwell”. The self-biasing results from avalanche-breakdown at the collector/base (i.e. grounded p+ to n-well) diffusion where avalanche-generated electron-hole pairs are created. The avalanche-generation source is shown schematically as current source I


GEN


in

FIG. 3

, which represents n-well (hole) current. The electrons generated from this effect migrate towards the n-well tie (which is elevated to the pad potential by well pump


162


) through the inherent n-well resistance, thereby producing a local reduction in the n-well potential near the transistor


156


. Once this potential falls roughly 0.5V below the pad voltage, for example, it is sufficient to forward bias the base-emitter junction (i.e. n-well to p+ pad) of the parasitic device, thereby turning the device on. The drain-to-source voltage and drain current point at which parasitic bipolar action first occurs is called (V


T1


, I


T1


), where I


T1


is the current which is flowing due to the avalanche-generation at the source/n-well junction. Usually, the bipolar device inherently contained in the P-channel MOS device of, for example, an output buffer is the most susceptible to snapback. This parasitic device is frequently the point of failure in a circuit subjected to an ESD event.





FIG. 4

illustrates a diagram of the snapback drain current versus drain-tosource voltage of the tracking well P-channel transistor of

FIG. 3

in response to a positive ESD event. When several PMOS transistors (or several fingers forming a single PMOS transistor) act as a parasitic bipolar device, the “snapback” current-voltage characteristics of the inherent parasitic bipolar transistor is used, as stated above, and a current begins to flow through the bipolar transistor at a certain collector-to-emitter voltage, V


T1


. Thereafter the collector-to-emitter voltage decreases as the current increases, “snapping back” from V


T1


. As drain voltage increases, the trend reverses, causing the collector-to-emitter voltage to rise as the current also rises. Eventually, the bipolar transistor fails at another particular collector-to-emitter voltage V


T2


. V


T2


is usually greater than V


T1


since on-resistance exhibited by the transistor is quite high. The failure current is the second breakdown current, I


T2


, shown in FIG.


4


. The value of I


T2


must not be exceeded during an ESD event or else permanent damage will result in the device. In general, I


T2


depends on specific fabrication parameters of a particular technology, and varies from technology to technology.




In one embodiment, the method and circuit of the present invention lowers the voltage of the source and in another embodiment, lowers the voltage of the drain of the P-channel transistor in order to keep the base-emitter voltage of the parasitic bipolar device low enough to prevent conduction in the parasitic bipolar device. The present invention prevents bipolar snapback in advanced semiconductor technologies where an almost instantaneous destruction of the device occurs once V


T1


has been exceeded (i.e., V


T2


=V


T1


and I


T2


=I


T1


). For these devices, it is not sufficient to ameliorate the effects of bipolar snapback once it has occurred, since a very low value of failure current, I


T2


, is exhibited. Rather, it is desirable to avoid snapback altogether and care must be taken to increase the magnitude of V


T1


so that the output buffer PMOS device does not snapback during an ESD discharge.





FIG. 5

illustrates in partial block diagram, partial schematic diagram form, an output buffer circuit


100


during an ESD event in accordance with the present invention. Circuit


100


is illustrated having ESD protection during a negative ESD event


104


, and includes the P-channel transistor


108


and an inherent diode


111


as illustrated in

FIG. 1

, a resistive element such as resistor


106


coupled to the source of the transistor


108


, a pad


102


or terminal coupled to the drain of the transistor


108


, and a source injection current source


112


which will be described further in reference to FIG.


6


.

FIG. 5

also includes an output buffer N-channel transistor


140


with an inherent diode


142


and ESD rail clamp


144


. P-channel transistor


108


is illustrated with the inherent diode


111


coupled between the source of the transistor


108


and well. The current source


112


has a first node coupled to the terminal or pad


102


, and a second node for extracting a current in response to the ESD event


104


on the pad


102


. The resistor


106


includes a first node coupled to a voltage reference node, which, during normal operation of the output buffer circuit


100


, is Vdd, and which becomes grounded during the negative ESD event


104


. The resistor


106


also includes a second node coupled to the second node of the current source


112


. The transistor


108


includes a control electrode, a first current electrode coupled to the pad


102


, and a second current electrode coupled to the second node of the current source


112


. A negative voltage event such as the negative ESD event


104


is detected at the first current electrode of the transistor


108


coupled to the pad


102


. The second current electrode of the transistor


108


, coupled to the current source


112


, is biased in response to detecting the negative ESD event


104


to prevent a forward biasing of the inherent diode


111


, or p-n junction, associated with the transistor


108


.





FIG. 6

illustrates, in schematic diagram form, the output buffer circuit


100


of FIG.


5


and illustrates in further detail an embodiment of the source injection current source


112


which is further comprised of a source injection bias circuit


114


and a source injector transistor


120


. N-channel source injector transistor


120


has a source coupled to the pad


102


, a gate, and a drain coupled to one terminal of the resistor


106


. The gate of the N-channel source injector transistor


120


is biased by a source injection bias circuit


114


including a feedback circuit having an N-channel transistor


122


, a P-channel transistor


126


, and a resistor


128


, and including a pull-down circuit having an N-channel transistor


124


and a resistor


130


. N-channel transistor


122


has a gate coupled to a ground terminal labeled Vss, a source coupled to pad


102


, and a drain. Resistor


128


has a first terminal coupled to the gate of P-channel transistor


126


, and a second terminal coupled to a positive power supply voltage terminal labeled Vdd. N-channel transistor


124


has a gate coupled to Vdd, a source coupled to Vss, and a drain. Resistor


130


has a first terminal coupled to the drain of N-channel transistor


124


, and a second terminal. P-channel transistor


126


has a drain coupled to the second terminal of resistor


130


, a gate coupled to the drain of N-channel transistor


122


, and a source coupled to Vdd.




During normal operation of the output buffer circuit, the gate of transistor


108


is biased by internal circuitry which causes transistor


108


to conduct as necessary to drive pad


102


to the required voltage. Furthermore, the gate of source injector transistor


120


is held at Vss by the pull-down circuit consisting of transistor


124


and resistor


130


, which prevents transistor


120


from conducting. Similarly, the gate of transistor


126


is held at Vdd in normal operation by resistor


128


, which prevents transistor


126


from conducting. Transistor


122


is held in a non-conducting state during normal operation since the gate of the transistor


122


is coupled to Vss.




During a negative ESD event or other EOS event, source injector bias circuit


114


maintains source injector transistor


120


in a conductive state. N-channel source injector transistor


120


then functions as a current source. N-channel transistor


120


becomes conductive when the voltage at pad


102


falls one threshold drop below the Vss causing a reduced potential to appear at the gate of P-channel transistor


126


. P-channel transistor


126


then becomes conductive which causes the gate of source injector transistor


120


to be coupled to Vdd which causes the N-channel source injector transistor


120


to become strongly conductive, since Vdd is the highest potential during the negative ESD event. Some of the ESD current is then conducted from Vdd, through resistor


106


to pad


102


through N-channel source injector transistor


120


. The rest of the ESD current flows from Vdd through an ESD rail clamp


144


, to Vss and back to pad


102


through an inherent drain diode


142


of an output N-channel transistor


140


.




By causing some of the ESD current to flow through resistor


106


and source injector transistor


120


, the voltage at the source or transistor


108


will be reduced, thus lowering the emitter potential of the inherent PNP transistor


110


(as illustrated in

FIG. 1

) preventing the inherent PNP transistor


110


from becoming conductive. This increases the magnitude of the negative voltage that can build up during an ESD event beyond that at which snapback would normally occur, which as discussed above, is particularly destructive to integrated circuits constructed using advanced, salicided technology.




The upper limit on the resistance of resistor


106


is determined by the length of the turn-on delay caused by resistor


106


to P-channel transistor


108


. Only a small voltage reduction on the source P-channel transistor


108


is needed to prevent conduction of the parasitic bipolar device because the well potential of transistor


108


cannot fall too far since the well is coupled to Vdd. If the source of P-channel transistor


108


is at least a diode drop below the well potential, bipolar snapback is prevented from occurring. In the illustrated embodiment, resistor


106


is implemented as having a resistance value of about 10 ohms or less.




In an alternate embodiment, instead of using source injection bias circuit


114


, the gate of N-channel source injector transistor


120


may be connected directly to Vss. However, an advantage to using source injection bias circuit


114


is that if Vss begins to move sympathetically with pad


102


, a gate-to-source voltage sufficient to keep n-channel source injector transistor


120


conductive is maintained because only a very small current in resistor


128


is enough to cause the voltage drop across resistor


128


to exceed the threshold voltage of P-channel transistor


126


. P-channel transistor


126


stays conductive, insuring that the gate voltage of source injector transistor


120


is high enough to cause source injector transistor


120


to remain highly conductive.




The use of resistor


106


with current source


112


formed by source injector transistor


120


and source injector bias circuit


114


can greatly extend the ESD range of the buffer circuit before breakdown occurs, which gives the ESD protection circuit more margin before failure of the device.





FIG. 7

illustrates in partial block diagram, partial schematic diagram form, an input/output buffer circuit


150


during an ESD event in accordance with the present invention. Circuit


150


is illustrated having ESD protection during a positive ESD event


154


, and includes a P-channel tracking well transistor


156


with an inherent diode


161


, a gate pump circuit


164


and well pump circuit


162


as illustrated in

FIG. 3

, and an ESD protection circuit


170


. A resistive element such as a resistor


158


is coupled to the drain of P-channel tracking well transistor


156


. Circuit


150


further includes an N-channel buffer transistor


168


and an ESD current source


166


which will be described further in reference to FIG.


8


. Tracking well P-channel transistor


156


is illustrated with the inherent diode


161


coupled between the drain of the transistor


156


and the well. The ESD current source


166


has a first node coupled to Vss and a second node coupled to the drain node of tracking well transistor


156


for extracting current from this node during a positive ESD event


154


. Resistor


158


includes a first node coupled to pad


152


and a second node coupled to the second node of the ESD current source and the drain of tracking well P-channel transistor


156


.




In normal operation input/output buffer circuit


150


either transmits internal signals to pad


152


(output buffer) or receives external signals from pad


152


(input buffer, not shown in FIG.


7


). Tracking well P-channel transistor


156


and N-channel buffer transistor


168


must remain in a non-conductive state when input/output buffer circuit


150


is used as an input buffer. Internal circuitry (not shown) is used to supply a high level signal (i.e. near Vdd) to the gate of tracking well P-channel transistor


156


and a low level signal (i.e. near Vss) to the gate of N-channel buffer transistor


168


when input/output buffer circuit


150


is used as in input buffer. Furthermore, it is a common requirement that, when input/output buffer circuit


150


is used as an input buffer, the circuit


150


have the ability to receive external signals which exceed the chip Vdd potential (HV-signal), which is known as high voltage tolerance. For example, a chip operating with a supply voltage of 2.5V may need to be able to receive input signals from other chips operating at 3.3V when both are placed in the same system. Tracking well P-channel transistor


156


includes a control electrode which is coupled to gate pump circuit


164


and a well electrode which is coupled to well pump circuit


162


. Tracking well P-Channel transistor


156


is coupled to gate pump


164


and well pump


162


so that when the HV-signal is received by pad


152


, the gate and well of tracking well P-channel transistor


156


can be elevated to the potential of pad


152


. The well potential of tracking well P-Channel transistor


156


is elevated to that of pad


152


, such that the inherent drain-to-well diode


161


of the transistor


156


does not forward bias in this situation. The gate potential of the tracking well P-channel transistor


156


is elevated to that of pad


152


such that the tracking well P-channel transistor


156


remains non-conductive since the transistor


156


would begin to conduct if the gate potential were a threshold drop below that of the (former) drain, which, in this situation, electrically acts as a new source.




During a positive ESD event


154


, a positive potential is detected on pad


152


which then causes current source


166


to extract some of the ESD current from the drain node of tracking well P-channel transistor


156


which in turn causes a potential drop across resistor


158


. The potential at the anode of inherent diode


161


is lowered. The well pump circuit


162


elevates the well of tracking well P-channel transistor


156


to a potential near that of the pad


152


. However, there is a finite time delay for this elevation to occur during which the well potential of tracking well P-channel transistor


156


may lag that of pad


152


, which would cause inherent diode


161


to forward bias thereby turning on the inherent PNP transistor


160


illustrated in FIG.


3


. Furthermore, under fast, extreme-potential ESD events, the well pump circuit


162


has a limited ability to drive the well of tracking well P-channel transistor


156


, which further allows the well to lag the pad


152


potential thereby turning on the inherent PNP transistor


160


illustrated in FIG.


3


. By lowering the potential at the anode of the inherent diode


161


, the inherent diode


161


is prevented from forward biasing which prevents the inherent PNP transistor


161


in

FIG. 3

from conducting. To prevent parasitic bipolar conduction, the drain of tracking well P-channel transistor


156


is at least one diode drop below the potential of the well of the transistor


156


. By extracting some of the ESD current during a positive event through resistor


158


, this reduction in potential can be achieved. The rest of the ESD current is conducted by ESD protection circuit


170


and ESD rail diode


172


.




The upper limit on the resistance of resistor


158


is determined by the length of the turn-on delay caused by resistor


158


to tracking well P-channel transistor


156


. Only a small voltage reduction on the drain of P-channel transistor


156


is needed to prevent conduction of the parasitic PNP device because the well potential of transistor


156


is elevated near the pad voltage by well pump


162


. If the drain of P-channel transistor


156


is at least a diode drop below the well potential of transistor


156


, bipolar snapback is prevented from occurring. In the illustrated embodiment, resistor


158


is implemented as having a resistance value of about 10 ohms or less.





FIG. 8

illustrates one embodiment of ESD current source circuit


166


. A diode string


192


is coupled to the drain terminal of ESD current source transistor


176


and P-channel transistor


174


to prevent the circuit


166


from responding to high voltage input signals in normal operation (i.e. high voltage tolerance). During normal operation, a pull-up circuit, consisting of P-channel transistor


178


and resistor


182


contained in current source bias circuit


186


, maintains transistor


176


in a non-conductive state by holding the gate of transistor


176


near Vdd. The transistor


176


must not conduct when HV signals are applied to the pad


152


. For example, the chip could operate at 2.5V and need to receive 3.3V input signals from external devices. If the diode string


192


were not present and the drain terminal of the transistor


176


directly coupled to pad


152


, transistor


176


would begin to conduct when the pad potential was greater that one threshold drop above Vdd, or approximately 0.5V+2.5V=3V, for example. However, when diode string


192


is present, a pad voltage of 3(V


d


)+|V


tp


|+Vdd, or approximately 3(0.5V)+0.5V+2.5V or 4.5V can safely be applied without causing current source transistor


176


to conduct. In general, the length of diode string


192


can be adjusted to accommodate any given input potential




During a positive ESD or EOS event, the P-channel transistor


176


functions as a current source. A feedback network consisting of P-channel transistor


174


, N-channel transistor


180


and resistor


184


contained in circuit


186


, maintains transistor


176


in a conductive state. The P-channel transistor


176


and the P-channel transistor


174


become conductive when the voltage at pad


152


exceeds one threshold voltage drop above Vdd, which is at ground potential during ESD event


154


. Current flow in P-channel transistor


174


flows through resistor


184


which causes a relatively high voltage to be supplied to the gate of N-channel transistor


180


. N-channel transistor


180


then becomes conductive causing the gate of P-channel transistor


176


to be pulled low, and causing current source P-channel transistor


176


to become strongly conductive. Some of the ESD current is conducted from pad


152


, through resistor


158


and P-channel current transistor


176


to Vss. The rest of the ESD event current flows through the ESD protection circuit


170


and the ESD rail diode


172


.




While the invention has been described in the context of a preferred embodiment, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that the present invention may be modified in numerous ways and may assume many embodiments other than that specifically set out and described above. For instance, the disclosed invention is described with respect to a particular set of transistor conductivity types. One skilled in the art, with the above description may change conductivity types under certain circumstances to tailor the invention to a particular process or embodiment. One skilled in the art may substitute other structures to accomplish the same purpose. Accordingly, it is intended by the appended claims to cover all modifications of the invention which fall within the true scope of the invention.



Claims
  • 1. A semiconductor device comprising:a terminal; a current source having a first node coupled to a first voltage reference node, and a second node for extracting a current in response to an electrostatic discharge (ESD) on the terminal; a first resistive element having a first node coupled to the terminal and a second node coupled to the second node of the current source; and a first transistor having a well, a control electrode, a first current electrode coupled to a second voltage reference node, and a second current electrode coupled to the second node of the current source.
  • 2. The semiconductor device of claim 1, wherein the first transistor is a P-channel transistor.
  • 3. The semiconductor device of claim 2, further comprising:a gate pump having a first node coupled to the terminal and a second node coupled to the control electrode of the first transistor; and a well pump having a first node coupled to the well of the first transistor and a second node coupled to the terminal.
  • 4. The semiconductor device of claim 2, wherein the first current electrode of the first transistor is a source electrode, and the second current electrode is a drain electrode.
  • 5. The semiconductor device of claim 1, wherein the current source further comprises a second transistor having a control gate, a first current electrode coupled to the first node of the current source, and a second current electrode coupled to the second node of the current source.
  • 6. The semiconductor device of claim 5, wherein the control gate of the second transistor is coupled to the second voltage reference node.
  • 7. The semiconductor device of claim 5, wherein the second transistor is a P-channel transistor.
  • 8. The semiconductor device of claim 5, wherein the current source further comprises a feedback circuit including a third transistor having a control electrode coupled to the second node of the current source, a first current electrode coupled to the first voltage reference node, and a second current electrode coupled to the control electrode of the second transistor.
  • 9. The semiconductor device of claim 8, further comprising:a fourth transistor having a control electrode, a first current electrode coupled to the second node of the current source, and a second current electrode coupled to the control electrode of the third transistor; and a second resistive element having a first node coupled to the control electrode of the third transistor, and a second node coupled to the first voltage reference node.
RELATED APPLICATION

This is a Continuation-In-Part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/201,392, filed Nov. 30, 1998 now U.S. Pat. No. 6,329,692 issued Dec. 11, 2001 and entitled “Circuit and Method For Reducing Parasitic Bipolar Effects During Electrostatic Discharges” (Smith), and is incorporated herein by reference and assigned to the current assignee hereof.

US Referenced Citations (7)
Number Name Date Kind
5019888 Scott et al. May 1991 A
5021853 Mistry Jun 1991 A
5157573 Lee et al. Oct 1992 A
5225702 Chatterjee Jul 1993 A
5440162 Worley et al. Aug 1995 A
5465189 Polgreen et al. Nov 1995 A
5903419 Smith May 1999 A
Non-Patent Literature Citations (4)
Entry
“Substrate Triggering and Salicide Effects on ESD Performance and Protection Circuit Design in Deep Submicron CMOS Processes,” Amerasekera, et al; IEEE; pp. 547-550 (1995).
“A Substrate Triggered Lateral Bipolar Circuit for High Voltage Tolerant ESD Protection Applications,” Smith.
“EOS/ESD Analysis of High-Density Logic Chips,” Ramaswamy, et al; EOS/ESD Symposium 96; pp. 6.4.1-6.4.6.
“Analysis of Snubber-Clamped Diode-String Mixed Voltage Interface ESD Protection Network for Advanced Microprocessors,” Voldman et al.; EOS/ESD Symposium 95; pp. 43-61.
Continuation in Parts (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 09/201392 Nov 1998 US
Child 09/559354 US