Full-duplex communications, in which a transmitter and a receiver of a transceiver operate simultaneously on the same frequency band, is drawing significant interest for emerging 5G communication networks due to its potential to double network capacity compared to half-duplex communications. Additionally, there are several efforts underway to include simultaneous transmit and receive functionality in the next generation phased array radar systems, especially in commercial automotive radars which can be an enabler technology for future connected or driverless cars. However, one of the biggest challenges from an implementation perspective is the antenna interface.
One way in which an antenna interface for a full-duplex transceiver can be implemented is using a non-reciprocal circulator. Reciprocity in electronics is a fundamental property of linear systems and materials described by symmetric and time-independent permittivity and permeability tensors. Non-reciprocity causes signals to travel in only one direction. For example, non-reciprocity in a circulator causes signals to travel in only one direction through the circulator. This directional signal flow enables full-duplex wireless communications because signals from the transmitter are only directed toward the antenna (and not the receiver) and received signals at the antenna are only directed toward the receiver (and not the transmitter). Moreover, the receiver is isolated from signals from the transmitter, preventing desensitization and possible breakdown of the receiver due to the high-power transmitted signal.
Conventionally, non-reciprocal circulators have been implemented using ferrite materials, which are materials that lose their reciprocity under the application of an external magnetic field. However, ferrite materials cannot be integrated into CMOS IC technology. Furthermore, the need for an external magnet renders ferrite-based circulators bulky and expensive.
Accordingly, new mechanisms for implementing non-reciprocity in circuits is desirable.
Circuits and methods for circulators including a plurality of cancellation paths are provided. In some embodiments, circulators are provided, the circulators comprising: a gyrator having a first side and having a second side connected to a third port; a first transmission line section having a first side connected to the first side of the gyrator and a second side connected to a first port; a second transmission line section having a first side connected to the first port and having a second side connected to a second port; a third transmission line section having a first side connected to the second port and having a second side connected to the third port; a first cancellation path that is connected between the first port and the third port and that introduces a current that is 90 degrees out of phase with a first voltage at the first port; and a second cancellation path that is connected between the second port and the third port and that introduces a current that is orthogonal to the current introduces by the first cancellation path.
Turning to
As can be seen, the signals at ωin−2ωin and ωin+2Φm are 180° out of phase and thus cancel out. Also, the signals at ωin all have the same phase, and thus add up into a single signal with a phase shift of Φ−Φ1, or 90°−Φ1. This is shown in graph 104 of
Turning to
As can be seen, the signals at ωin−2ωm and ωin+2ωm are 180° out of phase and thus cancel out. Also, the signals at ωin all have the same phase, and thus add up into a single signal with a phase shift of −Φ−Φ1, or −90°−Φ1. This is shown in graph 114 of
As can be seen in graphs 104 and 114 of
The scattering parameter matrix of the configuration shown in
where: j is the square root of −1. The ϕ in the term on the top right corner and +ϕ in the term on the bottom left corner show that the phase is non-reciprocal.
Turning to
As can be seen, the signals at ωin−2ωin and ωin+2Φm are 180° out of phase and thus cancel out. Also, the signals at ωin all have the same phase, and thus add up into a single signal with a phase shift of Φ−Φ1, or 45°−Φ1. This is shown in graph 204 of
Turning to
As can be seen, the signals at ωin−2ωm, ωin, and ωin+2ωm are 180° out of phase and thus cancel out. This is shown in graph 214 of
As can be seen in graphs 204 and 214 of
Another use of the structures of
In
Turning to
As shown in
Each of the transmission lines in
Transmission lines 308, 310, 312, 322, and 324 can be implemented in any suitable manner. For example, in some embodiments, one or more of the transmission lines can be implemented as C-L-C pi-type lumped sections. In some other embodiments, they may be implemented as truly distributed transmission lines.
The passive mixers can be driven by signals as shown in
In some embodiments, mixers 314, 316, 318, and 320 shown in
The switches in the switch groups can be implemented in any suitable manner. For example, in some embodiments, the switches can be implemented using NMOS transistors, PMOS transistors, both NMOS and PMOS transistors, or any other suitable transistor or any other switch technology.
Switch groups 414, 416, 418, and 420 can be controlled by local oscillator signals LO1, LO2, LO1Q, and LO2Q, respectively, as shown in
Turning to
The differential nature of the circulator can reduce the LO feedthrough and improve power handling. The fully-balanced I/Q quads can be designed using 2×16 μm/40 nm floating-body transistors. The placement of the gyrator in a symmetric fashion between the TX and RX ports can be used to enable switch parasitics to be absorbed into the lumped capacitance of the λ/8 sections on either side. Artificial (quasi-distributed) transmission lines with inductor Q of 20 can be used in the gyrator, using four stages of lumped it-type C-L-C sections with a Bragg frequency of 83.9 GHz. The ¼ transmission lines between the TX and ANT and ANT and RX ports can be implemented using differential conductor-backed coplanar waveguides. As shown, baluns can be included at the TX, ANT and RX ports to enable single-ended measurements, and separate test structures can be included to de-embed the response of the baluns.
Turning to
The circuits described herein can be implemented in any suitable technology in some embodiments. For example, in some embodiments, these circuits can be implemented in any semiconductor technology such as silicon, Gallium Nitride (GaN), Indium phosphide (InP), Gallium arsenide (GaAs), etc. More particularly, for example, in some embodiments, the circuits can be implemented in IBM 45 nm SOI CMOS process.
In
Turning to
where ν1+ and ν2− are the incident and transmitted signals at ports 1 and 2, respectively.
Alternatively, this structure can be modeled by multiplication, delay and multiplication as depicted in
which takes advantage of the fact that
for a binary (−1, +1) signal.
The signal propagation in the backward direction (from right to left) is shown in
where ν2+ and ν1− are the incident and transmitted signals at ports 1 and 2, respectively.
An analysis based on the signal flow diagram in
which takes advantage of m(t−Tm/2)m(t)=−1 for a binary (−1, +1) 50% duty-cycle signal.
From (1) and (2), the resultant S-parameters can be written as
where ωin and ωm are the signal and modulation frequencies, respectively. It should be noted S11=S22=0 since there is a pair of switches which connects the transmission line to the input and output at any instant in both half cycles. As can be seen from (3) and (4), this generalized spatio-temporal conductivity modulation technique is ideally lossless and breaks phase reciprocity over a theoretically infinite bandwidth. More importantly, it operates as an ideal passive lossless gyrator—a basic non-reciprocal component that provides a non-reciprocal phase difference of it and can be used as a building block to construct arbitrarily complex non-reciprocal networks—over theoretically infinite bandwidth. In practice, the insertion loss would be limited by ohmic losses in the switches and transmission line, and bandwidth by dispersion effects in the transmission line, particularly if it is implemented in a quasi-distributed fashion to absorb the capacitive parasitics of the switches.
In some embodiments, duty cycle impairment in the modulation clock can have an adverse effect on operation in the reverse direction. For example, let us assume a deviation from ideal 50% duty cycle by ΔTm. The forward direction remains unaffected, since m(t−Tm/4)m(t−Tm/4) continues to be +1, but in the reverse direction, m(t−Tm/2)m(t) will give a pulse train with a pulse width of ΔT and period of Tm/2 as depicted in
As shown in
A three-port circulator can be realized in some embodiments by introducing three ports λ/4 apart from each other as shown in
where TX is port 1, ANT is port 2, and RX is port 3.
Turning to
As shown in
At signal frequencies which are alternate odd multiples of the switching frequency (ωs) of the form (4n−1)ωs, the gyrator exhibits a +/−90-degree phase shift in forward/reverse directions, respectively. At frequencies of the form (4n+1)ωs, the gyrator exhibits a +/−90-degree phase shift in reverse/forward directions, respectively. This +/−90-degree phase shift creates a non-reciprocal ring with different transmission responses for clockwise and counterclockwise modes, Due to the −270-degree phase shift from the ring and −90-degree phase shift from the gyrator, wave propagation is supported in the clockwise direction. In the counterclockwise direction, however, the −270-degree phase shift from the transmission line and +90-degree phase shift from the gyrator result in a net phase shift of −180 degrees and suppression of the counterclockwise mode.
As shown in
Since the gyrator is externally LTI, the 3λ/4 ring around the gyrator (formed by transmission line sections 1412, 1414, and 1416) needs only to support the signal bandwidth, and hence, it can be designed to have a smaller bandwidth when compared to the transmission line in the gyrator.
The S-parameters of the circulator formed by gyrator 1402 and transmission line sections 1412, 1414, and 1416 can be calculated to be as shown in (6) above.
While the ports can be placed anywhere on the transmission line by maintaining the λ/4 separation, the placement of the RX port next to gyrator protects the modulating switches from the TX swing due to the inherent TX-RX isolation of the circulator in some embodiments. This technique greatly enhances the linearity and power handling at the TX port in some embodiments.
The gyrator architecture utilized here enables clocking at any odd sub-harmonic of the operating frequency, with the tradeoff that excessive lowering of the dock frequency requires a longer transmission line within the gyrator, thus increasing losses. In some embodiments, this feature can be exploited to enhance linearity and power handling, by using 333-MHz clocking for 1-GHz operation and using the thick-oxide transistors in a 180-nm SOI CMOS technology as the gyrator switches.
In some embodiments, leakage at RX port 1422 created by an impedance mismatch at ANT port 1420 can be nulled by cancellation paths 1424 and 1425 from TX port 1418 to RX port 1422 and from ANT port 1420 to RX port 1422, respectively, as shown in
As shown in
Cancellation path 1424 injects a current that is 90 degrees out of phase with the TX voltage due to its reactive nature, and is programmable in magnitude. Connection path 1425 introduces an orthogonal current to the one in path 1424 since the voltage at the ANT port is 90 degrees out of phase with respect to the TX voltage. A differential circulator implementation enables sign inversion in each of these paths, and therefore complete coverage of the complex plane is enabled without inductors and resistors (i.e., additional loss).
Along with the coverage for the antenna variations, the notch in TX-RX isolation can also be varied across frequency by choosing an appropriate value for the feed impedances.
The loading of the feed capacitors on the TX and ANT ports changes ΓANT, and, hence, TX-to-RX leakage, making the tuning for isolation a 2-D problem and increasing the time of search for finding the optimum setting for maximum TX-RX isolation. To compensate, differential tunable capacitors CANT 1702 and CTX 1704 can be implemented at both the TX and ANT ports, as shown in
CANT can also be used to compensate for the imaginary part of ΓANT similar to Cfeed,TX-RX. Hence, by using the tunability of CANT on top of the feed capacitors (Cfeed,TX-RX), the VSWR coverage of the balancing network can be increased even further or the tuning range of the feed capacitors can be reduced while achieving the same VSWR coverage. For instance, by using CA-NT along with the feed capacitors (Cfeed,TX-RX), the tuning range of Cfeed,TX-RX can be eliminated completely in an ideal circulator, while achieving the same VSWR coverage. In some embodiments, due to the presence of circulator non-idealities, Cfeed,TX-RX can be reduced by a factor of 2.
When an ideal circulator is terminated with an antenna with reflection coefficient of FANT [antenna impedance ZANT=ZO((1+ΓANT)/(1−ΓANT))], ΔCANT can be chosen such that it transforms ZANT to a real impedance Z′ANT with a corresponding reflection ΓANT, as expressed in
The leakage from this real reflection coefficient can be compensated using Cfeed,TX-RX from (8) and modifying CANT for loading of Cfeed,ANT-RX. The corresponding Zfeed,ANT-RX and ΔCANT are given by:
Transmission losses of an ideal circulator tuned to maximum isolation using CANT and Cfeed,ANT-RX are presented in (14) and (15) below.
In the absence of isolation tuning, the transmission loss of the ideal circulator across antenna VSWR can be expressed as S21,notuning=S32,notuning=|√{square root over (1−ΓANT2)}|. Due to isolation tuning, the increase in total link loss for small ΓANT is:
This is a second-order loss mechanism, although it does not represent dissipative losses but rather it represents loss due to mismatch. Tuning for larger PANT implies larger values of the feed capacitors, which results in larger mismatch.
In some embodiments, 4-bit single-ended capacitors, CSE1 and CSE2 1706, can be implemented at the ANT port to compensate for any differential bondwire mismatches.
Turning to
As shown, after process 1800 begins, the process monitors S31 at 1802, tunes CANT at 1804, and determines whether the imaginary part of S31 is zero at 1806. Monitoring of S31 can be performed in any suitable manner such as by using a network analyzer in some embodiments. The tuning of CANT can be performed by controlling which switches in the banks of CANT are turned on to add any suitable number of capacitors to CANT. Process 1800 can continue to tune CANT until the imaginary part of S31 is zero. Once the imaginary part of S31 is zero, the imaginary part of the ΓANT has been compensated.
Next, at 1808 and 1810, process 1800 can tune Cfeed,ANT-RX and monitor the real part of S31 to determine whether it is zero. The tuning of Cfeed,ANT-RX can be performed by controlling which witches in the banks of Cfeed,ANT-RX are turned on to add any suitable number of capacitors to Cfeed,ANT-RX, Process 1800 can continue to tune Cfeed,ANT-RX until the real part of S31 is zero. Process 1800 can determine the sign of C feed,ANT-RX based on the sign of the real part of S31.
When TX-RX isolation is high, the RX node is equivalent to a ground for TX excitations. Hence, Cfeed,ANT-RX is equivalent to a capacitor from ANT port to ground. As mentioned above, this loading on the ANT port makes tuning for isolation a 2-D problem. This can be avoided by compensating the loading due to Cfeed,ANT-RX, which is achieved by modifying CANT with ΔCANT=−0.5ΔCfeed,ANT-RX.
The tuning of Cfeed,ANT-RX at 1808 may modify the imaginary part of S31 due to non-idealities in the circulator. Thus, at 1812, process can determine whether the imaginary part of S31 is zero, and, if not, can branch to 1814 to tune Cfeed,TX-RX to adjust the imaginary part of S31, and compensate for loading by modifying CTX with ΔCTX=−0.5ΔCfeed,TX-RX at. After tuning Cfeed,TX-RX at 1814, process 1800 can determine whether the imaginary part of S31 is zero at 1816, and, if not, loop back to 1814. Otherwise, process 1800 can branch to 1818 to check to make sure the real part of S31 is still zero. If not, process 1800 can loop back to 1808.
If process 1800 determines at 1812 that the imaginary part of S31 is zero or determines at 1818 that the real part of Saris zero, then, at 1820, process 1800 can save the capacitor settings and end.
As shown in
where Qind is the quality factor of the inductors in the 3λ/4 ring, Qsw=ZO/Rsw is an effective quality factor associated with switch-ON resistance, QNReffec≈2(1+kQ
In some embodiments, to improve the linearity and power handling of the passive transistor switches in the gyrator, a DC bias voltage of 0.7 V (or any other suitable value) can be provided to the gates of the transistor switches in some embodiments.
In some embodiments, as shown in
In some embodiments, the differential tunable capacitors CTX and CANT can use 4-stacked switches, and the drains of these switches can be biased to VDD (e.g., 2.5 V) during their OFF state. This can allow the switches to remain in the OFF state and handle an AC swing up to 2×VDD per switch without violating breakdown conditions in some embodiments. Thus, these differential capacitor banks with 4-stacked switches can handle up to 20 Vpp, i.e., 33 dBm in some embodiments.
In some embodiments, the differential feed capacitor banks can use two MIM capacitors with four sets of 3-stacked thick-oxide switches, as shown in
In some embodiments, to protect the circulator and any connected circuits from electrostatic discharge (ESD), ESD diodes can be placed at the the RX port, where the voltage swing is heavily suppressed for TX-port excitations. Since the RX port is shorted to the ANT and TX ports at DC, these diodes offer ESD protection at the TX and ANT ports as well.
In some embodiments, any suitable values of components can be used in the circulators described herein. For example, in some embodiments, the values of various components can be as described below:
1) The inductors used to for transmission line sections can each have a single-ended inductance of 8 nH or any other suitable value in some embodiments. These inductors can be differentially coupled resulting in a high-quality factor of 22 at 1 GHz with self-resonance frequency at 4.5 GHz in some embodiments.
2) The switches in the doubly balanced switch sets can be implemented using 26×20 μm/0.32 μm thick-oxide floating body transistors in some embodiments. The device-level and layout-extracted ON-resistances of these transistors can be 1.5 and 1.8 ohms, respectively, in some embodiments.
3) The inductors in each of the differential hybrid-r sections of the gyrators can be implemented using two separate spiral inductors of inductance 7.5 nH each as shown in
4) The shunt capacitors at TX and ANT, CTX and CANT, can be implemented using differential 4-stacked switched capacitor banks in some embodiments. CTX and CANT can be implemented with 6-bit and 8-bit resolution and tuning range of 0.13-0.8 and 0.38-3.14 pF, respectively, in some embodiments. These capacitor banks can be designed for a Q of 40 in some embodiments.
5) The TX-ANT and ANT-RX feed capacitors (Cfeed,TX-RX and Cfeed,ANT-RX) can be implemented with 7-bit and 6-bit resolution and tuning range of −0.77-0.77 pF and −1.5-1.5 pF, respectively, as shown in
6) In some embodiment, two 3-stacked single ended switch capacitor banks can be implemented at ANT+ and ANT− to compensate for any differential mismatch between the bondwires.
7) In some embodiments, the clock path can include pseudo-differential buffers to convert an input 666-MHz sinusoid to a square wave, which can then be divided by 2 to generate differential I/Q modulation signals. These modulation signals can be buffered through an inverter chain with a fan-out of 2, and then the mixer switches can be driven by the final buffer with a fan-out of 1.5, in some embodiments.
In some embodiments, due to a differential implementation of the ANT port, a differential antenna has to be used. While a differential antenna can be implemented without any penalty, it must be noted that this would restrict the system to use certain antenna architectures, unlike single-ended electrical-balanced duplexers which are compatible with single-ended antennas. As an alternative, in some embodiments, a differential-to-single-ended balun can be implemented at the antenna port of the circulator.
Although single transmission lines are illustrated herein as having certain delays, such transmission lines can be implemented as two or more transmission lines having the same total delay.
Although the disclosed subject matter has been described and illustrated in the foregoing illustrative implementations, it is understood that the present disclosure has been made only by way of example, and that numerous changes in the details of implementation of the disclosed subject matter can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the disclosed subject matter, which is limited only by the claims that follow. Features of the disclosed implementations can be combined and rearranged in various ways.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/683,541, filed Jun. 11, 2018, which is hereby incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
This invention was made with government support under Grant No. HR0011-17-2-0007 awarded by the Department of Defense (DOD) and the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA). The government has certain rights in the invention.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2019/036628 | 6/11/2019 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2020/036669 | 2/20/2020 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4639622 | Goodwin et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
6559689 | Clark | May 2003 | B1 |
7671572 | Chung | Mar 2010 | B2 |
8339183 | Htoo et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8565701 | Sanchez et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8576752 | Sarca | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8963630 | Ceballos et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
9253875 | Lent et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9521023 | Martinez et al. | Dec 2016 | B2 |
9847865 | Moher | Dec 2017 | B2 |
20060186948 | Kelly et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20110299431 | Mikhemar et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20140194074 | Klomsdorf et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20150065065 | Rofougaran et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20170005696 | Sjoland | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170207532 | Wang | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170257136 | Gianvittorio et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170353210 | Pratt et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
WO 2006029286 | Mar 2006 | WO |
WO 2018052935 | Mar 2018 | WO |
WO 2018075113 | Apr 2018 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Abdelhalem, S.H., et al., “Tunable CMOS Integrated Duplexer with Antenna Impedance Tracking and High Isolation in the Transmit and Receive Bands”, In IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Techn., vol. 62, No. 9, Sep. 2014, pp. 2092-2104. |
Ahn, H.R., et al., “New Isolation Circuits of Compact Impedance-Transforming 3-dB Baluns for Theoretically Perfect Isolation and Matching”, In IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 58, No. 12, Nov. 2010, pp. 3892-3902. |
Allen, P., “The Turnstile Circulator”, In IRE Trans. Microw. Theory Techn., vol. 4, No. 4, Oct. 1956, pp. 223-227. |
Andrews, C. and Molnar, A.C., “A Passive Mixer-First Receiver with Digitally Controlled and Widely Tunable RF Interface”, In IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 45, No. 12, Dec. 2010, pp. 2696-2708. |
Baldwin, L., “Nonreciprocal Parametric Amplifier Circuits”, In Proc. of the Inst. Radio Eng., vol. 49, No. 6, Jan. 1961, p. 1075. |
Bharadia, D., et al., “Full Duplex Radios”, In Proc. of the ACM SIGCOMM Conf., Aug. 2013, pp. 375-386. |
Biedka, M.M., et al., “Ultra-Wide Band Nonreciprocity through Sequentially-Switched Delay Lines”, In Sci. Rep., vol. 7, art. No. 40014, Jan. 2017, pp. 1-16. |
Bosma, H., “On Stripline Y-Circulation at UHF”, In IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Techn., vol. 12, No. 1, Jan. 1964, pp. 61-72. |
Bult, K., “Analog Design in Deep Sub-Micron CMOS”, In Proceedings of the European Solid-State Circuits Conference, Sep. 2000, pp. 11-17. |
Carchon, G. and Nauwelaers, B., “Power and Noise Limitations of Active Circulators”, In IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Techn., vol. 48, No. 2, Feb. 2000, pp. 316-319. |
Chandrakasan, A.P., et al., “Low-Power CMOS Digital Design”, In IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 27, No. 4, Apr. 1992, pp. 1-12. |
Chang, D.Y. and Moon, U.K., “A 1.4-V 10-Bit25-MS/s Pipelined ADC Using Opamp-Reset Switching Technique”, In IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 38, No. 8, Jul. 2003, pp. 1401-1404. |
Choi, J.I., et al., “Achieving Single Channel, Full-Duplex Wireless Communication”, In Proc. of the 16th Annu. Int. Conf. Mobile Comput. Netw., Sep. 2010, pp. 1-12. |
Dastjerdi, M.B., et al., “Full Duplex Circulator-Receiver Phased Array Employing Self-Interference Cancellation via Beamforming”, In Proc. of the IEEE Radio Freq. Integr. Circuits Symp., Jun. 2018, pp. 108-111. |
Debaillie, B., et al., “Analog/RF Solutions Enabling Compact Full-Duplex Radios”, In IEEE J. of Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 32, No. 9, Sep. 2014, pp. 1662-1673. |
Desai, N.V., et al., “An Actively Detuned Wireless Power Receiver with Public Key Cryptographic Authentication and Dynamic Power Allocation”, In IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 53, No. 1, Sep. 2017, pp. 236-246. |
Dinc, T., et al., “A 60 GHz CMOS Full-Duplex Transceiver and Link with Polarization-Based Antenna and RF Cancellation”, In IEEE J. of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 51, No. 5, May 2016, pp. 1125-1140. |
Dinc, T., et al., “A Millimeter-Wave Non-Magnetic Passive SOI CMOS Circulator Based on Spatio-Temporal Conductivity Modulation”, In IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 52, No. 12, Dec. 2017, pp. 3276-3292. |
Dinc, T., et al., “Synchronized Conductivity Modulation to Realize Broadband Lossless Magnetic-Free Non-Reciprocity”, In Nature Commun., vol. 8, Oct. 2017, p. 765. |
Dokic, B.L., et al., “Low-Voltage Low-Power CMOS Design”, In Proceedings of the 2016 Symposium on Industrial Electronics, Nov. 2016, pp. 1-6. |
Elkholy, M., et al., “Low-Loss Integrated Passive CMOS Electrical Balance Duplexers with Single-Ended LNA”, In IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Techn., vol. 64, No. 5, May 2016, pp. 1544-1559. |
Esser, D., et al., “Improved Antenna Isolation in Transmit/Receive Applications”, In Proceedings of the German Microwave Conference, Mar. 2006, pp. 1-5. |
Estep, N.A., et al., “Magnetic-Free Non-Reciprocity and Isolation Based on Parametrically Modulated Coupled-Resonator Loops”, In Nature Phys., vol. 10, No. 12, Nov. 2014, pp. 923-927. |
Estep, N.A., et al., “Magnetless Microwave Circulators Based on Spatiotemporally Modulated Rings of Coupled Resonators”, In IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Techn., vol. 64, No. 2, Feb. 2016, pp. 502-518. |
Fan, L., et al., “An All-Silicon Passive Optical Diode”, In Science, vol. 335, Jan. 2012, pp. 447-450. |
Fayomi, C.J.B. and Roberts, G.W., “Design and Characterization of Low-Voltage Analog Switch Without the Need for Clock Boosting”, In Proceedings of the 47th Midwest Symposium on Circuits and Systems, Jul. 2004, pp. 1-4. |
Gallo, K., et al., “All-Optical Diode in a Periodically Poled Lithium Niobate Waveguide”, In Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 79, No. 3, Jul. 2001, pp. 314-316. |
Hamasaki, J., “A Theory of a Unilateral Parametric Amplifier Using Two Diodes”, In Bell Syst. Tech. J., vol. 43, No. 3, May 1964, pp. 1123-1147. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Dec. 15, 2020 in International Patent Application No. PCT/US2019/036628, pp. 1-6. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jan. 30, 2020 in International Patent Application No. PCT/US2019/036628, pp. 1-11. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Apr. 8, 2020 in International Patent Application No. PCT/US2020/014487, pp. 1-12. |
Kamal, A.K., “A Parametric Device as a Nonreciprocal Element”, In Proc, of the IRE, vol. 48, No. 8, Aug. 1960, pp. 1424-1430. |
Keskin, M., “A Low-Voltage CMOS Switch with a Novel Clock Boosting Scheme”, In IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems II: Express Briefs, vol. 54, No. 4, Jul. 2005, pp. 185-188. |
Koochakzadeh, M. and Abbaspour-Tamijani, A., “Miniaturized Transmission Lines Based on Hybrid Lattice-Ladder Topology”, In IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Techn., vol. 58, No. 4, Apr. 2010, pp. 949-955. |
Kord, A., et al., “Broadband Cyclic-Symmetric Magnetless Circulators and Theoretical Bounds on their Bandwidth”, In IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Techn., vol. 66, No. 12, Dec. 2018, pp. 5472-5481. |
Kord, A., et al., “Low-Loss Broadband Magnetless Circulators for Full-Duplex Radios”, In IEEE/MTT-S Int. Microw. Symp. Tech. Dig., Jun. 2018, pp. 506-509. |
Korpi, D., et al., “Full-Duplex Mobile Device: Pushing the Limits”, In IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 54, No. 9, Sep. 2016, pp. 80-87. |
Kumar, S., et al., “An Ultra-Low Power CMOS DC-DC Buck Converter with Double-Chain Digital PWM Technique”, In Journal of Analog Integrated Circuits and Signal Processing, vol. 92, No. 1, Jul. 2017, pp. 141-149. |
Lim, W.G., et al., “Transmitter and Receiver Isolation by Concentric Antenna Structure”, In IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 58, No. 10, Jul. 2010, pp. 3182-3188. |
Mikhemar, M., et al., “A Multiband RF Antenna Duplexer on CMOS: Design and Performance”, In IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 48, No. 9, Sep. 2013, pp. 2067-2077. |
Nagulu, A., et al., “Fully-Integrated Nonmagnetic 180 nm SOI Circulator with > 1W P1 dB, > +50 dBm IIP3 and High Isolation Across 1.85 VSWR”, In Proc. of the IEEE Radio Freq. Integr. Circuits Symp. (RFIC), Jun. 2018, p. 104-107. |
Nagulu, A., et al., “Nonreciprocal Components based on Switched Transmission Lines”, In IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Techn., vol. 66, No. 11, Nov. 2018, pp. 4706-4725. |
Oh, T., et al., “A Low-Power CMOS Piezoelectric Transducer Based Energy Harvesting Circuit for Wearable Sensors for Medical Applications”, In Journal of Low Power Electronics and Applications, vol. 7, No. 33, Dec. 2017, pp. 1-11. |
Peng, B., et al., “Parity—Time-Symmetric Whispering-Gallery Microcavities”, In Nature Phys., vol. 10, Apr. 6, 2014, pp. 394-398. |
Qi, G., et al., “A SAW-Less Tunable RF Front End for FDD and IBFD Combining an Electrical-Balance Duplexer and a Switched-LCN-Path LNA”, In IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 53, No. 5, May 2018, pp. 1431-1442. |
Qin, S., et al., “Nonreciprocal Components with Distributedly Modulated Capacitors”, In IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Techn., vol. 62, No. 10, Oct. 2014, pp. 2260-2272. |
Reiskarimian, N. and Krishnaswamy, H., “Magnetic-Free Non-Reciprocity based on Staggered Commutation”, In Nature Commun., vol. 7, art. No. 11217, Apr. 2016, pp. 1-10. |
Reiskarimian, N., et al., “A CMOS Passive LPTV Nonmagnetic Circulator and its Application in a Full-Duplex Receiver”, In IEEE J. of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 52, No. 5, May 2017, pp. 1358-1372. |
Reiskarimian, N., et al., “Analysis and Design of Commutation-Based Circulator-Receivers for Integrated Full-Duplex Wireless”, In IEEE J. of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 53, No. 8, Aug. 2018, pp. 2190-2201. |
Reiskarimian, N., et al., “Integrated Conductivity-Modulation-Based RF Magnetic-Free Nonreciprocal Components: Recent Results and Benchmarking”, In IEEE Antennas Wireless Propag. Lett., vol. 17, No. 11, Nov. 2018, pp. 1978-1982. |
Sabharwal, A., et al., “In-Band Full-Duplex Wireless: Challenges and Opportunities”, In IEEE J. of Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 32, No. 9, Sep. 2014, pp. 1637-1652. |
Sounas, D., et al., “Broadband Passive Isolators Based on Coupled Nonlinear Resonances”, In Nature Electron., vol. 1, Feb. 2008, pp. 113-119. |
Tanaka, S., et al., “Active Circulators—The Realization of Circulators Using Transistors”, In Proc. of the IEEE, vol. 53, No. 3, Mar. 1965, pp. 260-267. |
Tellegen, B.D.H., “The Gyrator, a New Electric Network Element”, In Philips Res. Rep., vol. 3, No. 2, Apr. 1948, pp. 81-101. |
Tyagi, S., et al., “An Advanced Low Power, High Performance, Strained Channel 65nm Technology”, In IEDM Tech. Dig., Dec. 2005, pp. 245-247. |
van den Broek, D.J., et al., “An In-Band Full-Duplex Radio Receiver with a Passive Vector Modulator Downmixer for Self-Interference Cancellation”, In IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 50, No. 12, Dec. 2015, pp. 3003-3014. |
van Liempd, B., et al., “2.2 A +70 dBm IIP3 Single-Ended Electrical-Balance Duplexer in 0.18 μm SOI CMOS”, In IEEE ISSCC Dig. Tech. Papers, San Francisco, CA, US, Feb. 22-26, 2015, pp. 1-3. |
van Liempd, B., et al., “Adaptive RF Front-Ends Using Electrical-Balance Duplexers and Tuned Saw Resonators”, In IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Techn., vol. 65, No. 11, Nov. 2017, pp. 4621-4628. |
van Liempd, B., et al., “An Electrical-Balance Duplexer for In-Band Full-Duplex with <-85 dBm In-Band Distortion at +10 dBm TX-Power”, In Proceedings of the 41st European Solid-State Circuits Conference, Sep. 2015, pp. 176-179. |
Wang, S., et al., “Fully Integrated 10-GHz Active Circulator and Quasi-Circulator Using Bridged-T Networks in Standard CMOS”, In IEEE Trans. Very Large Scale Integr. Syst., vol. 24, No. 10, Oct. 2016, pp. 3184-3192. |
Yang, D., et al., “A Wideband Highly Integrated and Widely Tunable Transceiver for In-Band Full-Duplex Communication”, In IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 50, No. 5, May 2015, pp. 1189-1202. |
Zhang, T., et al., “Wideband Dual-Injection Path Self-Interference Cancellation Architecture for Full-Duplex Transceivers”, In IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 53, No. 5, Jun. 2018, pp. 1563-1576. |
Zhou, J., et al., “Integrated Full Duplex Radios”, In IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 55, No. 4, Apr. 2017, pp. 142-151. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20210242552 A1 | Aug 2021 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62683541 | Jun 2018 | US |