Pulse radio ultra wide band (PR-UWB) communications can be used to facilitate low power, low data rate communications in a wide variety of applications, such as sensor networks. Such communications use periodically transmitted pulses of radio frequency energy to represent data. Power savings in such communications can be realized by turning the transmitter and receiver off between data pulses. In order to take advantage of the power savings of such communications, however, pulse radio receivers need to be able to precisely power off during times when no data pulses are being transmitted and power on when data pulses may be transmitted. However, current pulse radio receivers are lacking in their ability to perform this function.
Accordingly, new circuits and methods for pulse radio receivers are provided.
Circuits and methods for pulse radio receivers are provided. In some embodiments, circuits for a pulse radio receiver are provided, the circuits comprising: a radio frequency amplifier that powers off in response to an enable signal; a demodulator that outputs an RZ signal; an all-digital clock and data recovery circuit comprising: a phase detector that includes a tri-state phase frequency detector for use when in an acquisition mode and a Hogge phase detector for use when in a communication mode, that receives the RZ signal, and that outputs a phase detector output from the tri-state phase frequency detector when in the acquisition mode and from the Hogge phase detector when in the communication mode, a loop filter that receives the phase detector output from the phase detector and produces a loop filter output that is the sum of a proportional path of the loop filter and an integral path of the loop filter, and a numerical controlled oscillator that receives the loop filter output and produces the enable signal.
In some embodiments, methods of operating a pulse radio receiver are provided, the methods comprising: powering off a radio frequency amplifier in response to an enable signal; outputting an RZ signal from a demodulator; using an all-digital clock and data recovery circuit to: using a phase detector that includes a tri-state phase frequency detector for use when in an acquisition mode and a Hogge phase detector for use when in a communication mode to receive the RZ signal and output a phase detector output from the tri-state phase frequency detector when in the acquisition mode and from the Hogge phase detector when in the communication mode, using a loop filter to receive the phase detector output from the phase detector and produce a loop filter output that is the sum of a proportional path of the loop filter and an integral path of the loop filter, and using a numerical controlled oscillator to receive the loop filter output and produce the enable signal.
Various objects, features, and advantages of the disclosed subject matter can be more fully appreciated with reference to the following detailed description of the disclosed subject matter when considered in connection with the following drawings, in which like reference numerals identify like elements.
Circuits and methods for pulse radio receivers are provided.
In some embodiments, a receiver can be provided that includes three stages of RF gain and filtering, a self-mixer, a programmable gain amplifier, a demodulator, and an all-digital clock and data recovery (AD-CDR) circuit. During operation, the receiver can generally operate as follows. After being amplified and filtered in the three stages, a received signal can then be down-converted using the self-mixer, amplified using the programmable gain amplifier, and fed into the demodulator. In the demodulator, a threshold voltage recovery loop can be used to slice the analog pulses to obtain an RZ digital representation of the received signal. Finally, the AD-CDR can be used to recover the clock from the RZ pulses and self-duty-cycle the receiver and perform demodulation.
Turning to
As shown in
In accordance with some embodiment, On/Off Key (OOK) modulation can be used with receiver 100. Turning to
As illustrated in series of RF OOK symbols 202, the presence of an RF pulse at a given point in time can represent a ‘1’ OOK symbol and the absence of an RF pulse at a given point in time can represent a ‘0’ OOK symbol. In some embodiments, the RF pulses can have a width (tpulse) of approximately 3.5 ns and a bandwidth of approximately 500 MHz, and can have a frequency centered in the lower ultra-wide band (UWB) band (3.6-5 GHz). Additionally or alternatively, any other suitable width(s), bandwidth(s), and/or frequency center can be used in some embodiments.
In some embodiments, due to the highly localized nature of the symbols in time, the receiver can be powered down during inter-arrival times of the RF pulses and predictively turned on when a pulse is expected. The RX enable signal (also referred to herein as ENrec) illustrated in
Referring to
In some embodiments, as shown by merged coil 326, mutual inductance can be exploited by merging the source coil of source inductance 314 and the gate coil of gate inductance 310 into a single physical space.
Using the I-V relations of coupled inductors and eliminating vg, the input impedance presented by the LNA can be obtained as follows:
The total of the gate inductance, the source inductance, and their coupling (Lg+Ls+2M) in equation (3) can be realized with an equivalent, single five-turn, square spiral inductor. The outer three turns (the larger half) of the spiral can be used to realize the gate inductance, while the inner two turns of the spiral can be used to realize the source inductance. It can be understood that if Cgs→∞, the node G is AC shorted to S and the impedance between R and ground (Gd), ZRGd,∞→s(Lg+Ls+2M), which is the input impedance of the equivalent five turn inductor. Since the inductance seen from the source is the combination of the inner two turns and the mutual inductance, they both contribute to the real part of the input impedance.
Any suitable LC tank can be used for LC tank 320 in some embodiments. For example, in some embodiments, tank 320 can include drain inductance 322 and an accumulation/depletion varactor bank 324. The load formed by tank 320 is tunable by configuring varactor bank 324 to have a desired capacitance. In some embodiments, a capacitor bank can be used in addition to or as an alternative to varactor bank 324.
Cascode configured transistor 316 and switch 314 can be used to power-down the LNA between RF pulses and power-up the LNA when an RF pulse may be sent under the control of an RX Enable (EN) signal.
In some embodiments, in order to achieve a suitable conversion gain in self-mixer 116, the total gain from LNA 110, RF amplifier 112, and RF amplifier 114 may need to be greater than 50 dB. Two examples of RF amplifiers suitable for use as RF amplifiers 112 and 114 in some embodiments are described below.
As shown in
As illustrated in
Turning to
When implemented using example circuit 600, each signal transconductor is implemented as a pseudo-differential cascoded (transistor M3624 and transistor M2622) common-source stage (transistor M4628 and transistor M1618) with current re-use. In such transconductors, transistor M0614 (operating at the edge of saturation) is used to regulate the DC current in the transconductors via replica transconductor 612 to reduce sensitivity to the supply and process variations. Decoupling capacitor Cdecoup 616 is used to bypass transistor M0614 for signal frequencies. This ensures that the node labeled Vdd,int in circuit 600 behaves as a local, regulated Vdd for each of the transconductors. The gain of each stage is made tunable with a three-bit control by placing multiple such transconductors in parallel.
vcascn and vcascp are bias voltages and can be provided from any suitable source.
Referring to
In some embodiments, signal transconductors 808, 818, and 820 can be implemented using circuit 600 as described above in connection with
Circuit 1000 can also include an offset correction circuit between the output of mixer 1002 and the input of PGA 1004. This circuit can include transistors 1012, 1014, and 1018 and switch 1016. Under the control of a multi-bit digital signal D, multiple switches making up switch 1016 can change the current pumped in to the PGA and thus act as an offset correction circuit.
As shown in
The operation of the mixer is as follows: The voltage at the output of first RF amplifier 112 is converted into a current by signal transconductor 1004. The AC current generated by this transconductor is added to a DC bias current (transistor M01006 (and transistor M1, not shown)) before being fed into the “switching” differential pair (transistor M21008 (and transistor M3, not shown) and transistor M41010 (and transistor M5, not shown)). The switching pair is controlled by the output of second RF amplifier 114.
The output baseband current generated by the mixer is then converted to voltage by a trans-impedance amplifier (TIA) (formed from resistors 1020 and 1028 and operational transconductance amplifier 1022) and a tunable operational transconductance amplifier-resistance (OTA-R) amplifier (PGA) (formed from operational transconductance amplifier 1032, fixed resistors 1030 and 1034, and variable resistors 1024 and 1026). Variable resistors 1024 and 1026 can be digitally tunable in some embodiments.
As illustrated, PGA 1100 includes a diode pull down circuit 1146 formed from transistors 1148, 1150, 1152, and 1154, which operates to speed up the power on of the common mode of the OTAs, hence that of the OTAs and the power on of the overall receiver.
The output of the PGA (BB) is then fed into demodulator 120 (
Turning to
Resistors 1210, 1220, 1214, and 1224, OTAs 1226 and 1228, and capacitors 1212, 1222, and 1216 form a continuous time (CT) integrator with an auto-zero loop 1206. Capacitors 1230, 1236, 1238, 1244, inverter 1228, and switches 1232, 1234, 1240, and 1242 form an automatic threshold recovery (peak detector) circuit 1208.
Using circuit 1200, digitization of a baseband signal can be performed as follows. In a parallel path to the CT integrator, the signal from the PGA is compared by slicer 1202 with a coarse threshold voltage vthcoarse (which can be from a digitally adjustable source in some embodiments) to produce a digital signal outaux that represents the presence of a pulse in the channel when high. In some embodiments, slicer 1202 can be implemented as a continuous time differential difference comparator using a cascade of gain stages and inverters.
In some embodiments, the bit error ration (BER) can be adjusted by adjusting the threshold voltage labeled vthcoarse. However, it can be seen that the BER achieved using this method may be sensitive to the specific value of vthcoarse set by the user and the received signal power. To address this, in some embodiments, threshold recovery can be performed using automatic threshold recovery circuit 1208 as follows. The output of the CT integrator is tracked on capacitors C0 1230 and 1236 using switches 1232 and 1234 gated by outaux. Because outaux represents the duration of the pulse in the channel, the voltage sampled onto capacitors C0 1230 and 1236 is the peak of the integrator's output. outaux behaves like the integrator gating signal in a matched filtering approach. The voltage sampled on the capacitors is the integral of the received baseband pulse and therefore represents the symbol point in a constellation diagram of the receiver's output. The value sampled on capacitors C0 1230 and 1236 is accumulated on another pair of capacitors Cinf 1238 and 1244 during the hold phase (i.e., when outaux is low) through switches 1240 and 1242 as controlled by the output of inverter 1228. The voltage accumulated on capacitors Cinf over multiple symbols gives the noise averaged signal strength for the ‘1’ symbol. The output of the integrator is then sliced at half of this recovered threshold (differentially, vthp and the common mode voltage, vcm are used) using slicer 1204 (which can be implemented as a continuous time differential difference comparator using a cascade of gain stages). The demodulator outputs two digital RZ signals outRZ and outaux which can be used to recover the transmitted clock and convert the data into an NRZ stream.
Turning to
In some embodiments, the AD-CDR can be clocked by any suitable low-precision, low-power, fixed clock (fCLK). For example, in some embodiments, the clock can have a frequency of 100 MHz, 103 MHz, or any other suitable value.
Although the clock and data recovery circuit is described as being digital, in some embodiments, this circuit can be implemented using an analog CDR.
In the AD-CDR, the turn-ON edge from the NCO jitters over +/−10 ns (i.e., 1/fCLK) due to limit cycles when fCLK and fdata are unlocked. The timing precision of the recovered lock edge is inversely proportional to fCLK, so that the digital clock frequency would have to be increased to increase lock precision. Since clocking the digital backend with a higher frequency clock would translate to a higher power consumption in the backend and in the design of the oscillator, the clock frequency can be maximized just enough to meet the system level requirements on lock precision.
During operation of AD-CDR 1500, the AD-CDR operates in an acquisition mode and a communication mode. During the acquisition mode, such as following a cold start or when a pairing between a transmitter and a receiver is desired, a pilot pulse train of all ‘1’s is transmitted to the receiver. The receiver is continuously on during this mode and the CDR is configured to operate with a phase-frequency detector to obtain phase and frequency lock. Once the lock is achieved, the receiver enters the communication mode during which the receiver is powered on and off. In the communication mode, the CDR maintains phase lock with the incoming stream using Hogge phase detector 1514.
More particularly, the outRZ pulse arrival is compared to CLKout, the output of NCO 1506 as delayed by delay element 1510, using tri-state PFD 1502 during acquisition mode and Hogge phase-detector 1514 during communication mode. The loop bandwidth can be configured to be a fraction of the RZ pilot pulse arrival rate. The AD-CDR can operate in acquisition mode for the first 32 pulses on startup. Following this, the AD-CDR acquires a frequency lock and switches to communication mode, when Hogge phase detector 1514 is used to maintain phase lock.
Multiplexer 1516 selects one of the outputs of detectors 1512 and 1514 based on the mode of the receiver and provides that output to loop filter 1504. As shown in
Accumulator 1524 takes the output from the loop filter and provides that to a three bit multiplexer, which selects a certain bit of the divider output based on a signal KVCO. KVCO is a digital control that can be fed into the AD-CDR. The selected bit is then used as an enable signal ENrec to control the powering on and powering off of components of the receiver. The rising edge of ENrec is also provided as a reset signal to D-Flip-Flop 1508, after which D-Flip-Flop 1508 is reset and is set high.
Turning to
During operation, this circuit receives an enable (EN) signal, which can be ENrec. Divider 1702 divides this signal to produce a bias duty-cycling control signal (ENbias) and a store bias control signal (STRbias). Bias duty-cycling control signal (ENbias) can be used to power on the bias circuits for every five pulses out of every 128 pulses. Store bias control signal (STRbias) can be used to control the storing of the bias signal. These signals may be generated in the manner shown by signals 1802, 1804, 1806, and 1808 in example illustration 1800 of
In some embodiment, the receiver described herein can be implemented in any suitable semiconductor technology. For example, in some embodiments, the receiver can be implemented in a 65 nm LP CMOS technology.
Although the invention has been described and illustrated in the foregoing illustrative embodiments, it is understood that the present disclosure has been made only by way of example, and that numerous changes in the details of implementation of the invention can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention, which is limited only by the claims which follow. Features of the disclosed embodiments can be combined and rearranged in various ways.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/865,112, filed Aug. 12, 2013, which is hereby incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6781530 | Moore | Aug 2004 | B2 |
7190722 | Lakkis et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
20010041548 | Bult et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20040218687 | Santhoff | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050100102 | Gazdzinski et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050213635 | Terada et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060018369 | Sanada et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060071718 | McCorquodale et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060098713 | Tian | May 2006 | A1 |
20060198474 | Sorrells et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20080056419 | Lee et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080069183 | Terada | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20110150044 | Berekovic et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20120063556 | Hoang | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20130195159 | Morohashi | Aug 2013 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
Balankutty, A., et al., “A 0.6-V Zero-If/Low-IF Receiver with Integrated Fractional-n. Synthesizer for 2.4-GHz ISM-Band Applications”, In IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 45, No. 3, Mar. 2010, pp. 538-553. |
Cook, B.W., et al., “An Ultra-Low Power 2.4 GHz RF Transceiver for Wireless Sensor Networks in 0.13 μm CMOS with 400mV Supply and an Integrated Passive RX Front-End”, In Proceedings of the IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference (ISSCC '06), San Francisco, CA, US, Feb. 6-9, 2006, pp. 1-3. |
Crepaldi, M., et al., “An Ultra-Low Power Interference Robust IR-UWB Transceiver Chipset Using Self-Synchronizing OOK Modulation”, In Proceedings of the International Solid-State Circuits Conference (ISSCC '10), San Francisco, CA, US, Feb. 7-11, 2010, pp. 226-227. |
Crepaldi, M., et al., “An Ultra-Wideband Impulse-Radio Transceiver Chipset Using Synchronized-OOK Modulation”, In IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 46, No. 10, Aug. 11, 2011, pp. 2284-2299. |
Daly, D.C. and Chandrakasan, A.P., “An Energy-Efficient OOK Transceiver for Wireless Sensor Networks”, In IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 42, No. 5, May 2007, pp. 1003-1011. |
Daly, D.C. et al., “A Pulsed UWB Receiver SoC for Insect Motion Control,” In Proceedings of the IEEE Solid State Circuits Conference (ISSCC '09), vol. 45, No. 1, Feb. 8-12, 2009, San Francisco, CA, US, pp. 153-166. |
Darabi, H., et al., “A 2.4-GHz CMOS 563 Transceiver for Bluetooth”, In IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 36, No. 12, Dec. 2001, pp. 2016-2024. |
Diao, S., et al., “A CMOS Ultra Low-Power and Highly Efficient UWB-IR Transmitter for WPAN Applications”, In IEEE Transaction on Circuits and Systems—Part II: Express Briefs, vol. 56, No. 3, Mar. 2009, pp. 200-204. |
Dokania, R.K., “A Low Power Impulse Radio Design for Body-Area-Networks”, In IEEE Transactions on Circuits Syst. I: Regular Papers, vol. 58, No. 7, Apr. 25, 2011, pp. 1458-1469. |
Dong, Y., et al., “A 9mW High Band FM-UWB Receiver Front-End”, In Proceedings of the European Solid-State Circuits Conference, Edinburgh, GB, Sep. 15-19, 2008, pp. 302-305. |
Drago, S., et al., “A 2.4 GHz 830pJ/bit Duty-Cycled Wake-Up Receiver with -82dBm Sensitivity for Crystal-Less Wireless Sensor Nodes”, In Proceedings of the IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference (ISSCC '10), San Francisco, CA, US, Feb. 7-11, 2010, pp. 224-225. |
Federal Communications Commission, “First Report and Order,” FCC 02-48, Feb. 2002, pp. 1-118, available at: https://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering—Technology/Orders/2002/fcc02048.pdf. |
Fernandes, J.R. and Wentzloff, D., “Recent Advances in IR-UWB Transceivers: An Overview”, In Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems, Paris, FR, May 30-Jun. 2, 2010, pp. 3284-3287. |
Foerster, J.R., et al., “A Channel Model for Ultra Wideband Indoor Communication”, Technical Report, TR-2004-074, Mitsubishi Electric Research Laboratory, Inc, Oct. 2003, pp. 1-7. |
Gambini, S., et al., “A Fully Integrated, 290 pJ/bit UWB Dual-Mode Transceiver for cm-Range Wireless Interconnects”, In IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 47, No. 3, Jan. 3, 2012, pp. 586-598. |
Gerrits, J.F., et al., “FM-UWB: A Low-Complexity Constant Envelope LDR UWB Approach”, In the 13th IEEE International Conference on Electronics, Circuits and Systems (ICECS'06), Nice, FR, Dec. 10-13, 2006, pp. 797-801. |
Ghassemzadeh, S. and Tarokh, V., “The Ultra-wideband Indoor Path Loss Model”, In IEEE P802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs), Technical Report, Jul. 4, 2002, pp. 1-19. |
Gorlatova, M., et al., “Energy Harvesting Active Networked Tags (EnHANTs) for Ubiquitous Object Networking”, In IEEE Wireless Communications, vol. 17, No. 6, Dec. 2010, pp. 18-25. |
Gupta, B., et al., “FM-UWB for Radar and Communications in Medical Applications”, In the First International Symposium on Applied Sciences on Biomedical and Communication Technologies (ISABEL '08), Aalborg, DK, Oct. 25-28, 2008, pp. 1-5. |
Hu, C., et al., “A 90 nm-CMOS, 500 Mbps, 3-5 GHz Fully-Integrated IR-UWB Transceiver with Multipath Equalization using Pulse Injection-Locking for Receiver Phase Synchronization”, In IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 46, No. 5, Mar. 24, 2011, pp. 1076-1088. |
International Patent Application No. PCT/US2010/050595, filed Sep. 28, 2010. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Apr. 12, 2012 in International Patent Application No. PCT/US2010/050595. |
International Search Report dated Nov. 24, 2010 in International Patent Application No. PCT/US2010/050595. |
Kluge, W., et al., “A Fully Integrated 2.4-GHz IEEE 802.15. 4-compliant Transceiver for ZigBee Applications”, In IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 41, No. 12, Dec. 2006, pp. 2767-2775. |
Lachartre, D., et al., “A 1.1nJ/b 802.15.4a-Compliant Fully Integrated UWB Transceiver in 0.13 μm CMOS”, In Proceedings of the IEEE International Solid State Circuit Conference (ISSCC '09), Digest of Technical Papers, San Francisco, CA, US, Feb. 8-12, 2009, pp. 312-313. |
Lee, F.S. and Chandrakasan, A.P., “A 2.5 nJ/bit 0.65 V Pulsed UWB Receiver in 90 nm CMOS”, in IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 42, No. 12, Dec. 2007, pp. 2851-2859. |
Luecken, H., et al., “Synchronization scheme for low duty cycle UWB impulse radio receiver”, In IEEE International Symposium on Wireless Communication Systems, Reykjavik, IS, Oct. 21-24, 2008, pp. 503-507. |
Molnar, A., et al., “An Ultra-Low Power 900 MHz RF Transceiver for Wireless Sensor Networks”, In Proceedings of the IEEE Custom Integrated Circuits Conference, Orlando, FL, US, Oct. 3-6, 2004, pp. 401-404. |
Nejad, M.B., “Ultra Wideband Impulse Radio for Wireless Sensing and Identification”, Doctoral Thesis, KTH—Royal Institute of Technology, Dec. 2008, pp. 1-72. |
Norimatsu, T., et al., “A UWB-IR Transmitter with Digitally Controlled Pulse Generator”, In IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 42, No. 6, Jun. 2007, pp. 1300-1309. |
Office Action dated Apr. 24, 2013 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/498,801. |
Otis, B., et al., “A 400 μW-Rx, 1.6 mW-TX Super-Regenerative Transceiver for Wireless Sensor Networks”, In Proceedings of the IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference (ISSCC '05), San Francisco, CA, US, Feb. 10, 2005, pp. 396-606. |
Pletcher, N.M, et al., “A 52 μW Wake-Up Receiver With -72 dBm Sensitivity Using an Uncertain-IF Architecture”, In IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 44, No. 1, Jan. 2009, pp. 269-280. |
Smaini, L., et al., “Single-Chip CMOS Pulse Generator for UWB Systems”, In IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 41, No. 7, Jul. 2006, pp. 1551-1561. |
Solda, S., et al., “A 5 Mb/s UWB-IR Transceiver Front-End for Wireless Sensor Networks in 0.13 μm CMOS”, In IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 46, No. 7, May 27, 2011, pp. 1636-1647. |
Tamtrakarn, a., et al., “A 1-V 299 μW Flashing UWB Transceiver Based on Double Thresholding Scheme”, In Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on VLSI Circuits, Digest of Technical Papers, Honolulu, HI, US, Jun. 15-17, 2006, pp. 202-203. |
Terada, T., et al., “A CMOS Ultra-Wideband Impulse Radio Transceiver for 1-Mb/s Data Communications and ±2.5-cm Range Finding”, In IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 41, No. 4, Apr. 2006, pp. 891-898. |
Ugajin, M., et al., “Design Techniques for a 1-V Operation BLUETOOTH Rf Transceiver”, In Proceedings of the IEEE Custom Integrated Circuits Conference, Orlando, FL, US, Oct. 3-6, 2004, pp. 393-400. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/498,801, filed Mar. 22, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 61/246,529, filed Sep. 28, 2009. |
Van Helleputte, N., et al., “A Reconfigurable, 130 nm CMOS 108 pJ/pulse, Fully Integrated IR-UWB Receiver for Communication and Precise Ranging”, In IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 45, No. 1, Jan. 2010, pp. 69-83. |
Verhelst, M., et al., “A Reconfigurable 0.13 μm CMOS 110pJ/pulse, Fully Integrated IR-UWB Receiver for Communication and Sub-cm Ranging”, In Proceedings of the IEEE Int. Solid-State Circuits Conference (ISSCC '09), Digest of Technical Papers, San Francisco, CA, US, Feb. 8-12, 2009, pp. 250-251. |
Vigraham, B. and Kinget, P., “A Self-Duty-Cycled and Synchronized UWB Pulse-Radio Receiver SoC With Automatic Threshold-Recovery Based Demodulation”, In IEEE Journal of Solid State Circuits, vol. 49, No. 3, Mar. 2014, pp. 581-594. |
Vigraham, B. and Kinget, P., “A Self-Duty-Cycled and Synchronized UWB Receiver SoC Consuming 375pJ/b for -76.5dBm Sensitivity at 2Mb/s”, In Proceedings of the IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference (ISSCC '13), San Francisco, CA, US, Feb. 17-23, 2013, pp. 444-446. |
Vigraham, B. and Kinget, P., “An Ultra Low Power, Compact UWB Receiver with Automatic Threshold Recovery in 65 nm CMOS”, In Proceedings of the IEEE Radio Frequency Integrated Circuits Symposium, Montreal, QC, CA, Jun. 17-18, 2012, pp. 251-254. |
Wang, X., et al., “A Crystal-Less Self-Synchronized Bit-Level Duty-Cycled IR-UWB Transceiver System”, In IEEE Transactions on Circuits Syst. I, Apr. 9, 2013, pp. 2488-2501. |
Wang, X., et al., “A Meter-Range UWB Transceiver Chipset for Around-the-Head Audio Streaming”, In Proceedings of the IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference (ISSCC '12), San Francisco, CA, US, Feb. 19-23, 2012, pp. 450-452. |
Wang, X.Y., et al., “A Self-Synchronized, Crystal-Less, 86 μW, Dual-Band Impulse Radio for Ad-Hoc Wireless Networks”, In Proceedings of the IEEE Radio Frequency Integrated Circuits Symposium (RFIC '11), Baltimore, MD, US, Jun. 5-7, 2011, pp. 1-4. |
Wentzloff, D.D. and Chandrakasan, A.P., “A 47 pJ/pulse 3.1-to-5 GHz All-Digital UWB Transmitter in 90nm CMOS”, In Proceedings of the IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference (ISSCC '07), San Francisco, CA, US, Feb. 11-15, 2007, pp. 118-119. |
Wentzloff. D. D. and Chandrakasan, A. P., “Gaussian Pulse Generators for Subbanded Ultra-Wideband Transmitters” In IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 54, No. 4, Jun. 2006, pp. 1647-1655. |
Win, M.Z., et al., “Ultra-Wide Bandwidth Signal Propagation for Indoor Wireless Communications”, In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Communications, vol. 1, Montreal, QC, CA, Jun. 8-12, 1997, pp. 56-60. |
Wong, A., et al., “A 1V 5mA Multimode IEEE 802.15. 6/Bluetooth Low-Energy WBAN Transceiver for Biotelemetry Applications”, In Proceedings of the IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference (ISSCC '12), San Francisco, CA, US, Feb. 19-23, 2012, pp. 300-302. |
Wong, A.-W., et al., “A 1V, Micropower System-on-Chip for Vital-Sign Monitoring in Wireless Body Sensor Networks”, In Proceedings of the IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference (ISSCC '08), San Fancisco, CA, US, Feb. 3-7, 2008, pp. 138-602. |
Written Opinion dated Nov. 24, 2010 in International Patent Application No. PCT/US2010/050595. |
Xia, L., et al., “0.15-nJ/b 3-5-GHz IR-UWB System with Spectrum Tunable Transmitter and Merged-Correlator Noncoherent Receiver”, In IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 59, No. 4, Mar. 10, 2011, pp. 1147-1156. |
Zarifi, M. H. and Frounchi, J., “Design of an Input Matching Network for RF CMOS LNAs using Stack Inductors”, In Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer and Communication Engineering (ICCCE '08), Kuala Lumpur, MY, May 13-15, 2008, pp. 672-676. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150043616 A1 | Feb 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61865112 | Aug 2013 | US |