Circuits for a low swing clocking scheme

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6657474
  • Patent Number
    6,657,474
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, February 27, 2002
    22 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, December 2, 2003
    21 years ago
Abstract
In a clocking network with clock distribution in the gigahertz frequencies, low voltage swings are generated and applied instead of full voltage swings. The low voltage swing circuits are differential low voltage swing circuits. True and complement signals are transmitted in the global path, enabling cancellation of common mode noise picked up along the path from the generation point to the destination local ends, where the noise is subtracted from the signals. The low voltage swing circuits include a differential translator/driver, differential repeaters and differential receivers/translators to enable centrally generated low voltage swing clock signals to be distributed throughout the chip and to be faithfully converted to full voltage swing clock signals at the local ends. The input sections of the translator/driver convert a full voltage swing clock signal to a differential pair of low voltage swing clock signals, the differential repeaters are provided to repeat the low voltage swing clock signals to cover the paths up to the respective differential receivers/translators, and the differential receivers/translators convert the low voltage swing clock signals to full voltage swing clock signals.
Description




FIELD OF THE INVENTION




The present invention relates to a system in which a low voltage swing differential global clock network is applied on an integrated circuit chip.




BACKGROUND




In integrated circuits, inverters may be used to drive clock signals from a generation point where the signals are generated to the various points on an integrated circuit chip. The inverters are distributed throughout the integrated circuit chip, and function as inverting amplifiers which amplify the signals to compensate for any loss of signal occurred during propagation from the generation point at a central location to the various points on the chip.





FIG. 1

shows one exemplary embodiment of a full voltage swing clocking network, where the signals are driven from a generation point at a central location to receiving points at the four corners of an integrated circuit chip. As shown in

FIG. 1

, signals generated at the central location are driven to the corners, or local ends, through a network. This network, or clock tree


10


, radiates from the phase locked loop (PLL) to the local ends, and includes a plurality of inverters


101


. Each inverter


101


provides full voltage swing signals from ground to the supply voltage.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS




The present invention is illustrated by way of example in the following drawings in which like references indicate similar elements. The following drawings disclose various embodiments of the present invention for purposes of illustration only and are not intended to limit the scope of the invention.





FIG. 1

illustrates an exemplary full voltage swing clocking network.





FIG. 2

illustrates an exemplary low voltage swing differential clocking network according to this invention.





FIG. 3

illustrates an exemplary conceptual diagram of a branch of the clocking network of FIG.


2


.





FIGS. 4A-4E

show the waveforms of the input signals at various points in the clocking network of FIG.


3


.





FIG. 5

illustrates an exemplary embodiment of a differential translator/driver of FIG.


3


.





FIG. 6

illustrates a schematic diagram of the differential translator/driver of FIG.


5


.





FIG. 7

illustrates an exemplary embodiment of a differential repeater of FIG.


3


.





FIG. 8

illustrates an exemplary embodiment of another differential repeater of FIG.


3


.





FIG. 9

illustrates an exemplary embodiment of a differential receiver/translator of FIG.


3


.





FIG. 10

illustrates a schematic diagram of the differential receiver/translator of FIG.


9


.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION




In the full voltage swing clocking network of

FIG. 1

, with clock distribution in the gigahertz frequencies, a variety of constraints may arise due to the small period of the clock cycle. Delays may vary in the various distribution paths from the generation point to receiving points at the local ends. Further, time and location variation of delays, i.e. jitter and skew respectively, usually caused by noise in the supply rails and noise picked up in the distribution paths may increase. Thus, a substantial portion of the clock cycle may become lost and unusable in synchronous system design and operation, and power dissipation may be increased.




In accordance with the various exemplary embodiments of this invention, low voltage swings are generated and applied instead of full voltage swings. In these various embodiments, by using devices which produce low voltage swings and which may not be driven as hard as devices producing full voltage swings, power savings may be significantly obtained. Moreover, low voltage swing circuits may also produce low supply rail noise since the peak currents are smaller than those producing high voltage swings.




In accordance with the various exemplary embodiments of this invention, the low voltage swing circuits are differential low voltage swing circuits. In these differential circuits, true and complement signals are transmitted in the global path, enabling cancellation of common mode noise picked up along the path from the generation point to the destination local ends, where the noise is subtracted from the signals.




In accordance with the various exemplary embodiments of this invention, a low voltage swing circuit includes a differential translator/driver, differential repeaters and differential receivers/translators to enable centrally generated low voltage swing clock signals to be distributed throughout the chip and to be faithfully converted to full voltage swing clock signals at the local ends. In these various embodiments, the input sections of the translator/driver convert a full voltage swing clock signal to a differential pair of low voltage swing clock signals, the differential repeaters are provided to repeat the low voltage swing clock signals to cover the paths up to the respective differential receivers/translators, and the differential receivers/translators convert the low voltage swing clock signals to full voltage swing clock signals. Accordingly, the low voltage swing differential networks of this invention address at least the requirements for high bandwidth and low skew with power and area efficiency. Further, in these various exemplary embodiments, the input sections of the differential translator/driver, repeaters and receivers/translators operate as current mode linear circuits.





FIG. 2

shows one exemplary embodiment of a low voltage swing differential clocking network with partitioned clocking regions in accordance with this invention. Due to possible clock propagation bandwidth degradation and within die variations, in the exemplary embodiment of

FIG. 2

, the clocking network


100


is partitioned into small clocking regions, with the skew within the clock regions tightly controlled.




As shown in

FIG. 2

, clocking network


100


includes a phase locked loop (PLL)


120


, a differential translator/driver


140


, first differential repeaters


160


, second differential repeaters


170


, differential-single-ended receivers/translators


180


, and final load driving inverters


190


. Full swing complementary clock signals generated at the phase locked loop (PLL)


120


enter the translator/driver


140


, and then pass via a corresponding one of the first differential repeaters


160


, to a corresponding one of the second differential repeaters


170


, followed by a corresponding one of the differential receivers/translators


180


, and then a corresponding one of final load driving inverters


190


at the local end.





FIG. 3

shows an exemplary conceptual view of the differential network of FIG.


2


. As shown in

FIG. 3

, a pair of full voltage swing differential clocks CK and CK_bar is fed from the phase locked loop (PLL)


120


to the translator/driver


140


. The translator/driver


140


converts the full voltage swing clocks CK and CK_bar from the phase locked loop (PLL)


120


to two complementary low voltage swing clock outputs CK


2


and CK


2


_bar, which proceed to a first differential repeater


160


. The first differential repeater


160


sends its outputs CK


3


and CK_bar to a second differential repeater


170


. The low voltage swing clocks CK


4


and CK


4


_bar then proceed to a differential receiver/translator


180


, where they are combined to form a single full voltage swing clock output CK


6


_bar. The full voltage swing clock CK


6


_bar from the differential single-ended receiver/translator


180


is subsequently fed to the final load driving inverter


190


. The output of the final load driving inverter


190


is a full voltage swing clock signal CK


7


ready for distribution in the local area.




In accordance with the various exemplary embodiments of this invention, each of the translator/driver, differential repeaters, and receiver/translator includes a differential input pair which reduces or eliminates common mode noise that may be generated in previous circuits or picked up by the wires of the complementary signals. Thus, in the exemplary embodiment set forth in

FIG. 3

, noise which is common to the complementary signal lines tends to cancel as the signals enter any of the translator/driver


140


, first and second differential repeaters


160


and


170


, or receivers/translators


180


.





FIGS. 4A-4E

show the waveforms of the input signals at various points in the clocking network of FIG.


3


. As shown in

FIG. 4A

, the signal output from the phase locked loop (PLL)


120


to the translator/driver


140


is a full voltage swing differential signal. As shown in

FIGS. 4B and 4C

, the inputs to the first differential repeater


160


the second differential repeater


170


are low voltage swing differential signals. As shown in

FIG. 4D

, the input to the differential receiver/translator


180


is maintained as a low voltage swing differential signal. As shown in

FIG. 4E

, the clock signal CLK in the local area is restored as a full voltage swing single-ended signal.





FIGS. 5-8

show exemplary embodiments of the driver/translator, the first differential repeater and the second differential repeater of

FIG. 2

, respectively. In the exemplary embodiment of

FIG. 5

, the translator/driver


140


converts full voltage swing clock signals to a differential pair of low voltage swing clock signals and feeds the low voltage swing clock signals to the first differential repeater


160


.

FIG. 6

shows a schematic diagram of the translator/driver of FIG.


5


.




In the exemplary embodiments of

FIGS. 7 and 8

, the first and second differential repeaters


160


and


170


maintain low voltage swing clock signals throughout the differential network


100


to the differential receivers/translators


180


, where a full voltage swing clock signal is restored. That is, in the exemplary embodiments of

FIGS. 7

and


8


, the first and second differential repeaters


160


and


170


are buffered differential amplifiers used to amplify signals traveling on parallel distribution lines, and thus, they compensate for any attenuation of signals while cancelling common mode noise.




It should be appreciated that the translator/driver


140


and the first and second differential repeaters


160


and


170


used throughout the network in the various exemplary embodiments of this invention may be similar in form with possible minor variations at the beginning and end of the circuits. For example, as shown in

FIGS. 5-8

, the exemplary embodiment of the differential repeater


170


of

FIG. 8

contains a minor variation of the exemplary embodiment of the differential repeater


160


of FIG.


7


and the exemplary embodiment of the translator/driver


140


of FIG.


5


.




As shown in

FIG. 5

, the translator/driver


140


is a current mode amplifier which uses complementary input voltages CK and CK_bar, and a DC bias voltage vb. As shown in

FIG. 5

, the translator/driver


140


includes a first portion


142


and a second portion


144


. In this exemplary embodiment, the first portion


142


functions as a primary differential section which includes a differential pair of first transistors Q


1


and Q


2


and second transistors Q


3


and Q


4


, and a current source transistor Q


5


. The differential pair cancels out the common mode of the present stage to drive the next stage of the circuit. As shown in

FIG. 5

, first transistor Q


2


is provided with the input voltage CK, and second transistor Q


4


is provided with the complement input voltage CK_bar. First transistor Q


1


, second transistor Q


3


and current source transistor Q


5


are provided with the bias voltage vb, and act as current sources which ensure differential operation to cancel common mode noise present in the input voltages CK and CK_bar.




As shown in

FIG. 5

, the first portion


142


is connected to the second portion


144


via the drains of a pass transistor pair, first transistors Q


1


and Q


2


, and second transistors Q


3


and Q


4


. As shown in

FIG. 5

, the input of the second portion


144


appears as a virtual ground VG.




The second portion


144


includes a pair of first and second inverters


1442


and


1444


provided between the output and the input of the second portion


144


. The first inverter


1442


includes third transistors Q


6


and Q


7


, while second inverter


1444


includes fourth transistors Q


8


and Q


9


. Additionally, as shown in

FIG. 5

, a pass gate is provided between each of the first and second inverter outputs


1442


and


1444


and the output from the first portion


142


. That is, as shown in

FIG. 5

, pass gate


1446


is provided between the drains of first transistors Q


1


and Q


2


and the gates of third transistors Q


6


and Q


7


, while pass gate


1448


is provided between the drains of second transistors Q


3


and Q


4


and the gates of fourth transistors


98


and Q


9


. These pass gates


1446


and


1448


are provided as feedback devices for the inverters


1442


and


1444


.




In the exemplary embodiments of this invention, the second portion


144


is provided to behave as an op-amp which puts out a voltage equal to the current passing through the circuit multiplied by the resistance value of the feedback device pair


1446


and


1448


. By providing the feedback, a controlled gain and better bandwidth is obtained. That is, in the second portion


144


, the pass gate feedback reduces the output impedance of the two input voltages CK


1


and CK


1


_bar from the first portion


142


. Accordingly, the load capacitance of the circuit, for example, may be driven effectively in the second portion


144


, and a controlled gain and better bandwidth may be obtained. As shown in

FIG. 5

, a pair of complementary voltages CK


2


and CK


2


_bar is obtained from the second portion


144


.





FIG. 7

shows an exemplary embodiment of a differential repeater of FIG.


3


. The first repeater


160


of

FIG. 7

is similar to the translator/driver


140


of

FIG. 5

, and thus, can be represented by the schematic diagram of FIG.


6


. That is, as shown in

FIG. 7

, the first repeater


160


also includes a first portion


162


which functions as a high frequency compensating device to compensate for high frequency, and a second portion


164


provided as an op-amp which outputs a voltage equal to the current passing through the circuit multiplied by the resistance value of the feedback device pair.




In the differential repeater


160


of

FIG. 7

, the first portion


162


is a differential stage which may be small size to present a low capacitance on the input line, whereas the second portion


164


uses much larger devices to be able to drive the load consisting of interconnections and next portion input gate load. Thus, the differential repeater


160


may be provided with low impedance because of the size of the second portion


164


and the feedback devices. Accordingly, in these exemplary embodiments, the differential repeater


160


is provided as a loss compensating impedance converter to maintain a constant size low voltage swing signal to the output. As shown in

FIG. 7

, complementary voltages CK


3


and CK


3


_bar are obtained from the differential repeater


160


.





FIG. 8

shows another exemplary embodiment of another repeater of FIG.


3


. The second repeater


170


of

FIG. 8

is similar to the first repeater


160


of

FIG. 7

, with a minor variation. That is, as shown in

FIG. 8

, the second repeater


170


also includes a first portion


162


which functions as the input differential pair, and a second portion


164


provided as an op-amp which outputs a voltage equal to the current,passing through the circuit multiplied by the resistance value of the feedback device pair. However, the second repeater


170


differs from the first repeater


160


of

FIG. 7

in that an additional transistor Q


10


is provided in the first portion


162


as an additional compensating device. This provides better amplification at higher frequencies by acting as a bypass capacitor to ground at the drain of current source transistor Q


5


. As shown in

FIG. 8

, complementary voltages CK


4


and CK


4


_bar are obtained from the second repeater


170


.





FIG. 9

shows an exemplary embodiment of the differential receiver/translator of this invention, and

FIG. 10

shows the schematic diagram of the differential receiver/translator of FIG.


9


. As shown in

FIG. 9

, the differential receiver/translator


180


includes a first portion


182


, a second portion


184


and a third portion


186


. As shown in

FIG. 9

, the first portion


182


is a differential pair that accepts the true and complement signal inputs CK


4


and CK


4


_bar. The second portion


184


comprises an inverter


1844


with a pass gate


1842


as feedback, to produce a large signal with a process-supply voltage-temperature (PVT) tolerant swing at its output. By including the feedback device, the duty cycle may be controllable as the drive to the third portion


186


may be better balanced in the lower and upper half cycles, compensating PVT effects. The third portion


186


is a buffer that generates a near full voltage swing signal CK


6


_bar, to be buffered by the final load driving inverters


190


to restore the full voltage swing clock signal CK


7


to drive local circuits.




As shown in

FIG. 9

, the first portion


182


includes five transistors Q


1


-Q


5


forming a differential amplifier. The differential clock signals CK


4


and CK


4


_bar are fed to the gate of first transistors Q


2


and Q


4


, respectively. As shown in

FIG. 9

, the output from the first portion


182


is a single-ended signal CK_bar available at the drains of the transistors Q


1


and Q


2


. As shown in

FIG. 9

, transistor Q


3


is a diode-connected, single-ended drain-to-gate shorted PMOS device that provides automatic bias to transistor Q


1


. Transistor Q


1


behaves as a load current source for this differential amplifier. Transistor Q


5


is a current source transistor provided with bias voltage vb.




As shown in

FIG. 9

, the single-ended signal CK


5


_bar from the first portion


182


is fed to the second portion


184


. As shown in

FIG. 9

, the second portion


184


includes a pass gate


1842


and an inverter


1844


, wherein the pass gate


1842


is provided between the output of the first portion


182


and the inverter


1844


to function as a feedback device for the inverter


1844


. As shown in

FIG. 9

, the inverter


1844


includes third transistors Q


15


and Q


16


. The output from the second portion


184


goes from the drains of the third transistors Q


15


and Q


16


to the third portion


186


as a single-ended signal CK


6


.




As shown in

FIG. 9

, the third portion


186


includes a single inverter. The third portion


186


receives the output CK


6


from the second portion


184


and provides the inverted output CK


6


_bar.




The receiver circuit


180


translates back the incoming low voltage swing signal pair CK


4


and CK


4


_bar to a single-ended full voltage swing signal CK


6


_bar. This signal CK


6


_bar, after being amplified and inverted by one of the final load driving inverters


190


, is distributed as the last global clock signal CK


7


.




From the above description and drawings, it will be understood by those of ordinary skill in the art that the particular embodiments shown and described are for purposes of illustration only and are not intended to limit the scope of the invention. Those of ordinary skill in the art will recognize that the invention may be embodied in other specific forms without departing from its spirit or essential characteristics. References to details of particular embodiments are not intended to limit the scope of the claims.



Claims
  • 1. A system, comprising:a current mode translator/driver that converts a full voltage swing clock signal to a pair of differential low voltage swing clock signals; and a plurality of current mode differential receivers/translators that convert the low voltage swing clock signals to full voltage swing clock signals; wherein the translator/driver comprises a first portion that cancels common mode noise and includes a current source, and a second portion connected to the first portion that reduces output impedance as an op-amp and includes a pair of inverters and a passgate as a feedback device for each of the inverters.
  • 2. The system of claim 1, the first portion comprising a differential pair.
  • 3. The system of claim 1, the second portion comprising inputs which appear as virtual ground.
  • 4. The system of claim 1, further comprising a plurality of current mode differential repeaters that repeat the converted low voltage swing clock signals from the translator/driver to cover paths up to a respective one of the plurality of differential receiver/translators.
  • 5. The system of claim 4, each of the plurality of repeaters being a buffered differential amplifier that amplifies signals traveling on parallel distribution lines to compensate for attenuation of the signals while canceling common mode noise.
  • 6. The system of claim 4, each of the plurality of repeaters comprising a first portion that cancels common mode noise, and a second portion connected to the first portion that reduces output impedance as an op-amp.
  • 7. The system of claim 6, the first portion comprising a differential pair.
  • 8. The system of claim 6, the first portion further comprising a current source.
  • 9. The system of claim 6, the second portion comprising:a pair of inverters; and a passgate as a feedback device for each of the inverters.
  • 10. The system of claim 1, further comprising a plurality of load-driving inverters provided at local ends of the system, each load-driving inverters receiving a full voltage swing clock signal from a respective one of the plurality of differential receivers/translators.
  • 11. The system of claim 1, further comprising a phase locked loop that feeds the full voltage swing clock signal to the translator/driver.
  • 12. The system of claim 1, each of the plurality of receivers/translators comprising:a first portion that outputs a single-ended signal; a second portion comprising a feedback device connected to the first portion; and a third portion connected to the second portion that provides an inverted output signal.
  • 13. The system of claim 12, the first portion comprising a plurality of transistors configured as a differential amplifier.
  • 14. The system of claim 12, the second portion comprising:an inverter; and a passgate as a feedback device for the inverter.
  • 15. The system of claim 12, the third portion comprising an inverter.
US Referenced Citations (4)
Number Name Date Kind
5774007 Soneda Jun 1998 A
6323714 Naffziger et al. Nov 2001 B1
6433606 Arai Aug 2002 B1
6466074 Vakil et al. Oct 2002 B2
Non-Patent Literature Citations (2)
Entry
Varadarajan, Hemmige; Kumar, Sudarshan; Reitsma, Mike; Madhyastha, Sadhana; Design Comparison: Differential and Single-ended Clock Networks; Intel Design and Test Technology Conference; p. 1-5; 2000.
Varadarajan; Advanced Circuit Design; Food for Thought on Lowering Power and/or Raising uP Performance; Chapter 8; p. 81-8-10, Sep. 19, 2000.