Circuits for efficient detection of vector signaling codes for chip-to-chip communication

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 10164809
  • Patent Number
    10,164,809
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, November 14, 2017
    7 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, December 25, 2018
    5 years ago
Abstract
In a detection circuit, inputs correspond to received indications of vector signaling code words received by a first integrated circuit from a second integrated circuit. With four inputs, the circuit compares a first pair to obtain a first difference result and compares a second pair, disjoint from the first pair, to obtain a second difference result. The first and second difference results are then summed to form an output function. A system might use a plurality of such detection circuits to arrive at an input word. The circuit can include amplification, equalization, and input selection with efficient code word detection. The vector signaling code can be a Hadamard matrix code encoding for three input bits. The circuit might also have frequency-dependent gain, a selection function that directs one of the summation function result or the first difference result to the output function, variable gain, and/or a slicer.
Description
REFERENCES

The following references are herein incorporated by reference in their entirety for all purposes:


U.S. Patent Publication No. 2011/0268225 of application Ser. No. 12/784,414, filed May 20, 2010, naming Harm Cronie and Amin Shokrollahi, entitled “Orthogonal Differential Vector Signaling” (hereinafter “Cronie I”);


U.S. Patent Publication No. 2011/0302478 of application Ser. No. 12/982,777, filed Dec. 30, 2010, naming Harm Cronie and Amin Shokrollahi, entitled “Power and Pin Efficient Chip-to-Chip Communications with Common-Mode Resilience and SSO Resilience” (hereinafter “Cronie II”);


U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/030,027, filed Feb. 17, 2011, naming Harm Cronie, Amin Shokrollahi and Armin Tajalli, entitled “Methods and Systems for Noise Resilient, Pin-Efficient and Low Power Communications with Sparse Signaling Codes” (hereinafter “Cronie III”).


U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/463,742, filed May 3, 2012, naming Harm Cronie and Amin Shokrollahi, entitled “Finite State Encoders and Decoders for Vector Signaling Codes” (hereinafter called “Cronie IV”).


U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/844,331, filed Mar. 15, 2013, naming Harm Cronie and Brian Holden, entitled “Sorting Decoder” (hereinafter called “Cronie V”.)


U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/603,107, filed Sep. 4, 2012, naming Brian Holden and Amin Shokrollahi, entitled “Methods and Systems for Selection of Unions of Vector Signaling Codes for Power and Pin Efficient Chip-to-Chip Communication” (hereinafter “Holden I”).


U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/842,740, filed Mar. 15, 2013, naming Brian Holden, Amin Shokrollahi, and Anant Singh, entitled “Methods and Systems for Skew Tolerance in and Advanced Detectors for Vector Signaling Codes for Chip-to-Chip Communication” (hereinafter “Holden II”).


TECHNICAL FIELD

The present invention relates to communications in general and in particular to the transmission of signals capable of conveying information and detection of those signals in chip-to-chip communication.


BACKGROUND

In communication systems, a goal is to transport information from one physical location to another. It is typically desirable that the transport of this information is reliable, is fast and consumes a minimal amount of resources. One common information transfer medium is the serial communications link, which may be based on a single wire circuit relative to ground or other common reference, multiple such circuits relative to ground or other common reference, or multiple circuits used in relation to each other. A common example of the latter uses differential signaling (“DS”). Differential signaling operates by sending a signal on one wire and the opposite of that signal on a matching wire. The signal information is represented by the difference between the wires, rather than their absolute values relative to ground or other fixed reference.


There are a number of signaling methods that maintain the desirable properties of DS while increasing pin efficiency over DS. Vector signaling is a method of signaling. With vector signaling, a plurality of signals on a plurality of wires is considered collectively although each of the plurality of signals might be independent. Each of the collective signals is referred to as a component and the number of plurality of wires is referred to as the “dimension” of the vector. In some embodiments, the signal on one wire is entirely dependent on the signal on another wire, as is the case with DS pairs, so in some cases the dimension of the vector might refer to the number of degrees of freedom of signals on the plurality of wires instead of exactly the number of wires in the plurality of wires.


With binary vector signaling, each component or “symbol” of the vector takes on one of two possible values. With non-binary vector signaling, each symbol has a value that is a selection from a set of more than two possible values. Any suitable subset of a vector signaling code denotes a “subcode” of that code. Such a subcode may itself be a vector signaling code.


Some vector signaling methods are described in Cronie I, Cronie II, Cronie III, Cronie IV, and Cronie V. While non-binary vector signaling methods can provide substantial improvements regarding the tradeoff of pin efficiency, power efficiency and noise resilience as compared to traditional signaling methods, there are some applications wherein additional improvements are possible, and sometimes necessary.


BRIEF SUMMARY

In a detection circuit, inputs correspond to received indications of vector signaling code words received by a first integrated circuit from a second integrated circuit. In a preferred embodiment, the number of inputs is four and the detection circuit compares a first pair of the inputs to obtain a first difference result and compares a second pair of inputs, disjoint from the first pair of inputs, to obtain a second difference result. The first difference result and the second difference result are then summed to form an output function. A system might use a plurality of such detection circuits to arrive at an input word.


In one embodiment, each input is from the set {−1, −⅓, ⅓, 1}, the vector signaling code comprises the union of all permutations of the symbol set {1, −⅓, −⅓, −⅓} and all permutations of the symbol set {−1, ⅓, ⅓, ⅓}, the system uses three of the detection circuits, and the eight possible vector signaling code words encode for three input bits.


In accordance with at least one embodiment of the invention, circuits and systems are described for the efficient reception and detection of vector signal coded data transmitted over physical channels such that the signals transmitted are resilient to common mode noise, do not require a common reference at the transmission and reception points, and can produce a higher pin efficiency than conventional differential signaling with relatively low power dissipation for encoding and decoding. In some embodiments, different voltage, current, etc. levels are used for signaling and more than two levels might be used, such as a ternary sparse signaling code wherein each wire signal has one of three values. The decoder can be a 4×4 Hadamard matrix decoder to decode a Hadamard matrix code with two differences/comparisons followed by a summation.


Hardware elements might be provided to provide storage for symbols of input information used for selecting code words, processing hardware to convert symbols to signals, parsing symbols into separate partitions, storing results, and providing the partitions in sequence as signals. Various embodiments are given with reference to specific hardware implementations of small area and low power dissipation. In hardware, a “function” might be implemented using specific circuit elements, active or passive, or might be implemented as a consequence of connections of a circuit interconnection. For example, a summation function might be implemented by wiring two current sources in parallel to form a three-wire junction such that the current on one wire of the connection is the sum (or inverse of the sum) of the currents on the other two wires. Alternatively, a particular circuit element could receive two physical values and output their sum.


This Brief Summary is provided to introduce a selection of concepts in a simplified form that are further described below in the Detailed Description. This Brief Summary is not intended to identify key or essential features of the claimed subject matter, nor is it intended to be used as an aid in determining the scope of the claimed subject matter. Other objects and/or advantages of the present invention will be apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art upon review of the Detailed Description and the included drawings.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Various embodiments in accordance with the present disclosure will be described with reference to the drawings. Same numbers are used throughout the disclosure and figures to reference like components and features.



FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram that depicts aspects of an example multiple wire communications channel utilizing encoding and decoding in accordance with at least one embodiment of the invention.



FIGS. 2A, 2B and 2C are schematic diagrams of example differential amplifier stage embodiments in accordance with the invention.



FIGS. 3A, 3B and 3C are schematic diagrams illustrating termination of receive inputs to a chip in accordance with at least one embodiment of the invention.



FIG. 4 is a schematic diagram of a circuit combining computation function, signal multiplexing, and adjustable gain and equalization or peaking, in accordance with at least one embodiment of the invention.



FIG. 5 is a block diagram showing use of the termination network of FIGS. 3A-3C and multiple instances of the circuit of FIG. 4 to provide a complete receive input system, in accordance with at least one embodiment of the invention.



FIG. 6 is a block diagram showing use of signal feedback in accordance with at least one embodiment of the invention.



FIG. 7 is a schematic diagram of another circuit combining computation function signal multiplexing, and adjustable gain and equalization or peaking, in accordance with at least one embodiment of the invention.



FIG. 8 is a table illustrating logical values that might appear at various points in a detector in accordance with at least one embodiment of the invention.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Conventional communications systems receivers operate on individual wires or communications channels (i.e., single-ended signaling) or on pairs of wires or communications channels (i.e., differential signaling). In either case, a received signal is detected by comparison of a received value against a reference; for single-ended signaling, the reference may be a known voltage level such as ground or a calculated or predetermined offset voltage, while a differential receiver detects the signal of one wire in the pair in comparison to the signal of the other wire in the pair.


Such communications channels may be extended to groups of wires carrying signals that collectively represent an encoded value. FIG. 1 is a block diagram showing communications channel 140 connecting transmitting device 110 to receiving device 150 using an example a group of four wires 145 to communicate source data 100 to destination 180 using a vector signaling code produced by encoder 120 and interpreted by decoder 170. Also shown are connectors 130, 131, line receiver 160 and connectors 165, 166.


Holden I describes an enhancement to the vector signaling code technique that makes use of the observation that the balance between complementary signals in a differential signaling channel need not be held exactly to zero. Thus, a vector signaling code may comprise the union of subcodes, each subcode being distinguishable by its unique nonzero code word sum.


Vector signaling code receivers may perform a first operation similar to that of a conventional receiver, by making a first determination of the symbol represented by the particular received signal of each wire or communications channel. However, complete detection of the vector signaling code can require identification not merely of the individual symbols of that code, but of the particular code word represented by the set of symbols communicated as a group. A vector signaling code receiver is said to “detect” vector signaling code C if for each code word c, the receiver produces a valid and unique result Sc, which may directly correspond to receive result R, or may produce R via a mapping operation.


Holden II describes the use of weighted multi-input comparators for detection of vector signaling codes. A weighted multi-input comparator with coefficients a0, a1, . . . , am−1 is a circuit that accepts as its input a vector (x0, x1, . . . , xm−1) and outputs the signals indicated in Equation 1, with the definition of the sign-function being sign(x)=+1 if x>0, sign(x)=−1 if x<0, and sign(x) is undefined if x=0.

Output=sign(a0*x0+ . . . +am−1*xm−1)   (Eqn. 1)


A collection of such comparators each having distinct sets of input weights may serve as a detector for a vector signaling code.


Efficient Computational Element


In a detection circuit, inputs correspond to received indications of vector signaling code words received by a first integrated circuit from a second integrated circuit. In a preferred embodiment, the number of inputs is four and the detection circuit compares a first pair of the inputs to obtain a first difference result and compares a second pair of inputs, disjoint from the first pair of inputs, to obtain a second difference result. The first difference result and the second difference result are then summed to form an output function. A system might use a plurality of such detection circuits to arrive at an input word.


In one embodiment, each input is from the set {−1, −⅓, ⅓, ⅓}, the vector signaling code comprises the union of all permutations of the symbol set {1, −⅓, −⅓, −⅓} and all permutations of the symbol set {−1, ⅓, ⅓, ⅓}, the system uses three of the detection circuits, and the eight possible vector signaling code words encode for three input bits.


With the detection circuit performing differences ahead of performing summation, it becomes possible to provide for lowered distributed impedance and better high frequency response. In part, this is a result of capacitance appearing at lower impedance points rather than higher impedance points.


In accordance with at least one embodiment of the invention, a code herein referred to as “H4” is described. H4 is a balanced, non-sparse vector signaling code of four symbols, comprising the union of all permutations of the symbol set {1, −⅓, −⅓, −⅓} and all permutations of the symbol set {−1, ⅓, ⅓, ⅓}.


An efficient component of a detector for H4 code performs calculations of the form shown in Equation 2 where J, K, L, M are variables representing the symbol values of the four input signals values.

R=(J+L)−(K+M)   (Eqn. 2)


It may be noted that applying three instances of Equation 2 with different permutations of receive signal input values to the four variables is sufficient to detect each code word of H4. As one example and without limitation, the input permutations producing the three results R0, R1, R2 based on Equations 3, 4 and 5 are sufficient to unambiguously identify each code word of vector signaling code H4 as represented by receive signal input values A, B, C, D.

R0=(A+C)−(B+D)   (Eqn. 3)
R1=(C+D)−(A+B)   (Eqn. 4)
R2=(C+B)−(D+A)   (Eqn. 5)


Architecturally, it is convenient to perform such detection operations at or near the receiver input, and high speed capability requires an efficient, high performance embodiment.



FIG. 2A is a schematic diagram of one example circuit performing the required calculation. It will be readily apparent to one familiar with the art that the difference of two sums function of Equation 2 may be regrouped using the associative rule into an equivalent form comprising a sum of two differences. These regrouped forms of Equations 3, 4, and 5 are shown as Equations 6, 7, and 8.

R0=(A−B)+(C−D)   (Eqn. 6)
R1=(C−A)+(D−B)   (Eqn. 7)
R2=(C−D)+(B−A)   (Eqn. 8)



FIG. 8 is a table illustrating logical values that might appear at various points in a detector in accordance with at least one embodiment of the invention as represented by the equations above. It should be understood that this is but one example of an implementation or a few variations thereof


The four circuit inputs of FIG. 2A are labeled J, K, L, M as at 201, and the inputs are gate inputs to differential transistor pairs 230 and 235, each transistor pair herein referred to as a differential amplifier. These differential amplifiers share load resistors 220 providing the necessary sum function, with the inherent differential function within each of differential amplifier 230 and 235 providing the necessary difference elements. Thus, the complimentary outputs labeled out and outb at 240 represent the result of Equation 6, as an example, based on inputs J, K, L, M. Splitting the conventional current sink per differential pair into individual per-transistor current sinks 238 allows introduction of resistors 236 and capacitors 237 that provide a frequency-dependent gain characteristic for line equalization or peaking.



FIG. 2B is a schematic diagram of another embodiment of the invention. In this design, resistors 256 and capacitors 257 connect from the source of each transistor to a common node 258, providing a desirable frequency-dependent gain characteristic for equalization or signal peaking.



FIG. 2C is a schematic diagram of a further embodiment of the invention, where the common node 278 is used as a common connection to single current sink 290, rather than the multiple current sinks of FIG. 2B. Capacitors 276 are shown connecting between each transistor drain to ground, with capacitors 276 and resistors 275 again providing a desirable frequency-dependent gain characteristic for equalization or peaking.


It will be apparent to one skilled in the art that the functional equivalent of Equation 2, including specific examples such as illustrated by Equations. 6, 7, and 8, may be embodied by any of the circuits of FIGS. 2A-2C, given an appropriate mapping of receive signal input values A, B, C, D to circuit inputs J, K, L, M. It will also be apparent that the described circuit topology may be applied to compute equivalent detection functions for codes other than the example H4 code.


In at least one embodiment of the invention as represented in each schematic of FIGS. 2A-2C, one or both of the resistors and capacitors described as providing equalization or signal peaking are trimmable or variable, allowing the amplification and equalization or peaking characteristics to be adjusted. The initial value or adjusted value of the capacitors may include zero, without limitation. Load resistors 220 may be replaced by current sources, by current sources controlled by a common mode feedback, or by a combination of resistors and inductors to provide additional high-frequency peaking.


On-Chip Receive Signal Termination


At contemplated signal rates, conventional best practice might be to provide matched transmission line termination for current mode logic (CML) receive input signals. Examples in accordance with at least one embodiment of the invention are shown in FIGS. 3A-3C.


In FIG. 3A, signal inputs 301 labeled inputs a, b, c, and d are illustrated with external blocking capacitors 310, which optionally may be used to prevent DC current flow over the interconnection. The presence of impedance anomalies such as bond wires and bonding pads is suggested at 315, representing such known sources of signal degradation at high data rates.


In at least one embodiment, the same circuitry used for vector signaling code detection over example inputs a, b, c, d, also provides “legacy mode” support for, as an example, differential signal reception on the same inputs. Such selection of “legacy mode” may require support for greater signal level inputs (as those signals may be provided by different or earlier-generation components), and this extended-range input support may be obtained by attenuating large signal inputs before subsequent processing, as examples ah, bh, ch, dh at 335.


To provide this attenuation function, the termination resistance 320 is shown comprising components 321 and 322; as one example, they represent identical resistive values summing to the required termination impedance while also providing an attenuated output within allowable on-chip signal levels. Thus, signals 330 labeled a, b, c, d represent the full input signal level, while signals 335 labeled ah, bh, ch, dh represent, continuing the example, the same values attenuated to half amplitude. Subsequent processing circuits may select either full input signals or attenuated signals using, as an example, an analog multiplexer. The values of 321 and 322 need not be identical, and in some embodiments may be adjustable or trimmable, as illustrated by 322 of FIGS. 3A-3C.


Other embodiments in accordance with the invention utilize equivalent attenuator topologies known in the art, including so-called “T” and “PI” configurations, or eschew attenuation and combine elements 321 and 322 into a single resistive termination. One alternative embodiment of termination resistance 320 is shown in FIG. 3B, where components 321 and 322 provide the desired attenuation ratio, and component 323 is trimmed or adjusted to obtain the desired termination impedance.


In FIGS. 3A and 3B, all terminations 320 connect to common mode bias source 340 and common mode filter capacitor 345. The bias voltage provided by source 340 to subsequent active circuits can be circuit-and process-dependent; one typical value is 600 mV.


Another embodiment is illustrated in FIG. 3C, which provides level-shifting where blocking capacitor 310 is not used. Rather than utilizing a common bias source 340, the common termination node is coupled to ground via common mode filter capacitor 345, which may be shared across all terminations 320. The individual full-level and attenuated outputs are obtained through RF pass capacitors 385 and bias resistors 395, with the bias level of the receiver inputs set by current source 341 flow through the resistive path of 395 and 320.


Combined Multiplexer and Computation Element


A described computational circuit as in any of FIGS. 2A-2C may be integrated with the suggested multiplexer function, as shown in the example circuit of FIG. 4. This example comprises three components; the first selects between the difference of inputs J and K, or the difference of attenuated inputs Jh and Kh; the second performs the computation of Equation 2 on inputs J, K, L, M, or provides internal loopback of this chip's transmit signals; and the final element selects between the outputs of the first or of the second components.


This staged topology has been found to minimize loading effects, thus providing optimum performance for the given process technology. The results allow embodiment of legacy mode operation with either attenuated input signals or full level input signals, an internal signal test mode, and/or vector signaling code detection.


Selectively enabling or disabling pairs of current sinks using the control signals Enab1 through Enab6 controls the multiplexer. As examples, inputs a and b may be selected instead of inputs ah and bh by enabling current sinks using Enab1 and disabling current sinks using Enab2, and then further selected by enabling current sinks using Enab5 and disabling current sinks using Enab6 to, as an example, support a legacy mode differential receiver behavior. Conversely, selection of the computed function based on inputs a, b, c, d may be selected by enabling current sinks using Enab3 and Enab4, and further selected by disabling current sinks using Enab5 and enabling current sinks using Enab6.


One embodiment incorporates a test mode loopback of local transmit signals, which may be obtained by enabling pass transistors 470 using control signal Enab7. It will be apparent to a practitioner of the art that this multiplexer may also be used for other input selections, including alternative mappings of wire signals to computed function inputs and/or a different computed function.


Inputs to an element 400 of FIG. 4 are J, K, L, M, Jh, Lh, and the Tx signals for loopback. The final outputs of element 400 are the complimentary values muxoutp and muxoutm. Resistive and capacitive elements 450 and 460 may be incorporated as previously described to provide input gain and/or frequency-dependent equalization or peaking, and resistive elements 455 provide for controllable overall gain at the final output stage. One or more of elements 450, 455, and 460 may be trimmable or adjustable, and/or may include capacitive values of zero if no frequency dependency is desired. One or more of load resistors shown as 415, 416, and 417 may be replaced by current sources, by current sources controlled by a common mode feedback, or by a combination of a resistor and inductor to provide additional high-frequency peaking.


An alternative embodiment of 400 is shown in FIG. 7 with all input multiplexing taking place in a single stage, rather than in the cascaded stages of FIG. 4. Cascode transistors 790 are shown as an optional addition to provide additional isolation of the half-level inputs (and their associated circuit parasitic capacitance) when not enabled by control Enabl3. As with the previous example, resistors 750 and capacitors 760 may be utilized to adjust gain and/or high frequency peaking or compensation, and may be trimmable or adjustable. Load resistors 715 may also be replaced by current sources, by current sources controlled by a common mode feedback, or by a combination of resistors and inductors to provide additional high-frequency peaking.


Receive Input System for Vector Signaling Code


The previously described circuits may be combined to produce a complete receive input system, as shown in the block diagram of FIG. 5. As an example, four chip-to-chip interconnection wires labeled as inputs a, b, c, d may be terminated as previously described for FIGS. 3A-3C by termination network 300.


Three instances of combined multiplexer and computation element 400 are used, each operating as previously described, e.g., for FIG. 4. The three instances of element 400 shown in FIGS. 5 as 520, 530, and 540 respectively perform the computations associated with Equation 3, Equation 4, and Equation 5, based on the permutations of input signal connections shown. Under control of signals MuxSel (which within element 400 manipulate controls Enable1 through Enable7 of FIG. 4 as previously described) instance 520 may also alternatively provide a differential result of inputs a and b, a differential result of attenuated input signals ah and bh, or a loopback of internal signals Txa and Txb. Similarly, instance 540 may also alternatively provide a differential result of inputs c and d, a differential result of attenuated input signals ch and dh, or a loopback of internal signals Txc and Txd, and instance 530 may alternatively provide a loopback of internal signals Txe and Txf.


In one embodiment, the outputs of instance 530 are used only in non-legacy, non-loopback modes, thus the unused signal inputs of 530 are connected to a passive signal level such as ground. Although one familiar with the art would note that the instance of 530 could be simplified by removing unnecessary components associated with the unused functions, the amount of chip area wasted by not doing so is extremely small, while maintaining identical layouts for all instances provides consistent loading and delay characteristics throughout.


Other Variations


In at least one embodiment, all active transistor stages (e.g., of the circuit of FIG. 4 or the system of FIG. 5) are biased to be substantially in linear amplification mode. Thus, as examples, the signal outputs muxout0p, muxout1p, muxout2p, etc. of FIG. 5 represent analog signals, albeit ones that uniquely identify code words of the vector signaling code. Subsequent reception steps may include additional frequency- or time-domain equalization, sampling to capture particular time intervals, and slicing to obtain digital results. However, the possibility of incorporating such subsequent steps is not limiting; a minimal embodiment may utilize, as examples, simple threshold (e.g., Schmidt trigger) gates or high gain nonlinear amplifier stages to convert the outputs to digital values.



FIG. 6 provides a block diagram of another embodiment, incorporating feedback around the multiplexer and VGA stages to extend frequency response and allow greater receive bandwidth.


For purposes of illustration, the previously-described components of the receive detection system are shown in FIG. 6 as representing input/computational element 610 acting on inputs 601 and 611 acting upon inputs 602, multiplexer element 620 selecting between the input/computational elements, and output amplifier 630 producing signal outputs 650. As examples suggested by the symbols on their icons, 610 and 611 may further incorporate frequency-dependent peaking or filtering action, and 630 may further incorporate adjustable gain. Portions of outputs 650 are passed through networks comprised of resistors 631 and capacitors 632 to amplifiers 640, creating a controlled negative feedback loop that extends the linearity and bandwidth of included elements 620 and 630. As suggested by 632, elements of the feedback network may be adjustable or trimmable.


Other embodiments in accordance with the invention may interface to voltage-mode or high-impedance unterminated signal inputs, and/or communicate internal signals as voltage rather than current levels. Such embodiments may incorporate the known practice of using transmission gates as multiplexing elements.


The examples illustrate the use of vector signaling codes for point-to-point wire communications. However, this should not been seen in any way as limiting the scope of the described invention. The methods disclosed in this application are equally applicable to other communication media including optical and wireless communications. Thus, descriptive terms such as “voltage” or “signal level” should be considered to include equivalents in other measurement systems, such as “optical intensity”, “RF modulation”, etc. Similarly, specific examples provided herein are for purposes of description, and do not imply a limitation.


As used herein, “physical signal” includes any suitable behavior and/or attribute of a physical phenomenon capable of conveying information. In accordance with at least one embodiment of the invention, physical signals may be tangible and non-transitory. In accordance with at least one embodiment of the invention, interpreting a set of signals as selecting an object (e.g., a data object) includes selecting the object based at least in part on the set of signals and/or one or more attributes of the set of signals. In accordance with at least one embodiment of the invention, interpreting a set of signals as representing an object (e.g., a data object) includes determining and/or selecting the object based at least in part on a representation corresponding to the set of signals. In accordance with at least one embodiment of the invention, a same set of signals may be used to select and/or determine multiple distinct objects (e.g., data objects).

Claims
  • 1. A method comprising: receiving a set of input signals via a corresponding set of wires of a multi-wire bus;generating a differential output signal on a pair of differential output nodes using, in a first mode of operation, a set of input transistors driven by the set of input signals, the set of input transistors connected to the pair of differential output nodes for driving a combined differential current through the pair of differential output nodes, the set of input transistors connected to the corresponding set of wires according to an input permutation selected from plurality of input permutations associated with a vector signaling code;generating, in a second mode of operation, the differential output signal using a pair of input transistors connected to a first pair of wires of the multi-wire bus, the pair of input transistors receiving a first pair of input signals of the sset of input signals via the first pair of wires of the multi-wire bus and responsively driving a differential current through the pair of differential output nodes; andproviding the differential output signal for use in determining an output bit.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the first pair of wires of the multi-wire bus are adjacent.
  • 3. The method of claim 1, further comprising attenuating the first pair of input signals in the second mode of operation.
  • 4. The method of claim 1, wherein the pair of input transistors is part of the set of input transistors, and wherein one or more of the set of input transistors is disabled in the second mode of operation.
  • 5. The method of claim 1, further comprising applying a bias to the set of input signals.
  • 6. The method of claim 1, wherein the set of input signals corresponds to symbols of a codeword of the vector signaling code in the first mode of operation.
  • 7. The method of claim 6, wherein the codeword is a permutation of ±[+1, −⅓ −⅓ −⅓].
  • 8. The method of claim 1, further comprising receiving a control signal to select between the first and second modes of operation.
  • 9. The method of claim 8, wherein the control signal comprises a plurality of enable signals for selectively enabling a plurality of current sources connected to the set of input transistors.
  • 10. The method of claim 1, wherein generating the differential output signal comprises drawing current through a differential pair of resistors connected to the pair of differential output nodes.
  • 11. An apparatus comprising: a set of input transistors configured to receive a set of input signals via a corresponding set of wires of a multi-wire bus and to responsively generate a differential output signal on a pair of differential output nodes, the set of input transistors configured to: generate, in a first mode of operation, the differential output signal by driving a combined differential current through the pair of differential output nodes, the set of input transistors connected to the corresponding set of wires according to an input permutation selected from plurality of input permutations associated with a vector signaling code; andgenerate, in a second mode of operation, the differential output signal by driving a differential current through a pair of the set of input transistors according to a first pair of input signals of the set of input signals received via a first pair of wires of the multi-wire bus; andthe pair of differential output nodes configured to provide the differential output signal for use in determining an output bit.
  • 12. The apparatus of claim 11, wherein the first pair of wires of the multi-wire bus are adjacent.
  • 13. The apparatus of claim 11, further comprising an attenuation circuit configured to attenuate the first pair of input signals in the second mode of operation.
  • 14. The apparatus of claim 11, wherein one or more of the set of input transistors is disabled in the second mode of operation.
  • 15. The apparatus of claim 11, further comprising a biasing circuit configured to apply a bias to the set of input signals.
  • 16. The apparatus of claim 11, wherein the set of input signals correspond to symbols of a codeword of the vector signaling code in the first mode of operation.
  • 17. The apparatus of claim 16, wherein the codeword is a permutation of ±[+1, −⅓ −⅓ −⅓].
  • 18. The apparatus of claim 11, wherein the set of input transistors is further configured to receive a control signal and to responsively select between the first and second modes of operation.
  • 19. The apparatus of claim 18, wherein the set of input transistors are connected to a plurality of current sources, and wherein the control signal comprises a plurality of enable signals configured to selectively enable each current source.
  • 20. The apparatus of claim 11, further comprising a differential pair of resistors connected to the pair of differential output nodes, the differential pair of resistors configured to generate the differential output signal as a differential voltage based on current drawn through the differential pair of resistors.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 15/271,065, filed Sep. 20, 2016, entitled “Circuits for Efficient Detection of Vector Signaling Codes for Chip-to-Chip Communication,” which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 15/070,911, filed Mar. 15, 2016, entitled “Circuits for Efficient Detection of Vector Signaling Codes For Chip-to-Chip Communication Using Sums of Differences,” which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/895,206 filed May 15, 2013, entitled “Circuits for Efficient Detection of Vector Signaling Codes For Chip-to-Chip Communication Using Sums of Differences”, all of which are hereby incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.

US Referenced Citations (451)
Number Name Date Kind
668687 Mayer Feb 1901 A
780883 Hinchman Jan 1905 A
3196351 Slepian Jul 1965 A
3636463 Ongkiehong Jan 1972 A
3824494 Wilcox Jul 1974 A
3939468 Mastin Feb 1976 A
4163258 Ebihara Jul 1979 A
4181967 Nash Jan 1980 A
4206316 Burnsweig Jun 1980 A
4276543 Miller Jun 1981 A
4414512 Nelson Nov 1983 A
4486739 Franaszek Dec 1984 A
4499550 Ray, III Feb 1985 A
4722084 Morton Jan 1988 A
4772845 Scott Sep 1988 A
4774498 Traa Sep 1988 A
4864303 Ofek Sep 1989 A
4897657 Brubaker Jan 1990 A
4974211 Corl Nov 1990 A
5017924 Guiberteau May 1991 A
5053974 Penz Oct 1991 A
5166956 Baltus Nov 1992 A
5168509 Nakamura Dec 1992 A
5266907 Dacus Nov 1993 A
5283761 Gillingham Feb 1994 A
5287305 Yoshida Feb 1994 A
5311516 Kuznicki May 1994 A
5331320 Cideciyan Jul 1994 A
5412689 Chan May 1995 A
5449895 Hecht Sep 1995 A
5459465 Kagey Oct 1995 A
5461379 Weinman Oct 1995 A
5510736 Van De Plassche Apr 1996 A
5511119 Lechleider Apr 1996 A
5553097 Dagher Sep 1996 A
5566193 Cloonan Oct 1996 A
5599550 Kohlruss Feb 1997 A
5626651 Dullien May 1997 A
5629651 Mizuno May 1997 A
5659353 Kostreski Aug 1997 A
5727006 Dreyer Mar 1998 A
5748948 Yu May 1998 A
5802356 Gaskins Sep 1998 A
5825808 Hershey Oct 1998 A
5856935 Moy Jan 1999 A
5875202 Venters Feb 1999 A
5945935 Kusumoto Aug 1999 A
5949060 Schattschneider Sep 1999 A
5982954 Delen Nov 1999 A
5995016 Perino Nov 1999 A
6005895 Perino Dec 1999 A
6084883 Norrell Jul 2000 A
6119263 Mowbray Sep 2000 A
6172634 Leonowich Jan 2001 B1
6175230 Hamblin Jan 2001 B1
6232908 Nakaigawa May 2001 B1
6278740 Nordyke Aug 2001 B1
6316987 Dally Nov 2001 B1
6346907 Dacy Feb 2002 B1
6359931 Perino Mar 2002 B1
6378073 Davis Apr 2002 B1
6384758 Michalski May 2002 B1
6398359 Silverbrook Jun 2002 B1
6404820 Postol Jun 2002 B1
6417737 Moloudi Jul 2002 B1
6433800 Holtz Aug 2002 B1
6452420 Wong Sep 2002 B1
6473877 Sharma Oct 2002 B1
6483828 Balachandran Nov 2002 B1
6504875 Perino Jan 2003 B2
6509773 Buchwald Jan 2003 B2
6522699 Anderson Feb 2003 B1
6556628 Poulton Apr 2003 B1
6563382 Yang May 2003 B1
6621427 Greenstreet Sep 2003 B2
6624699 Yin Sep 2003 B2
6650638 Walker Nov 2003 B1
6661355 Cornelius Dec 2003 B2
6664355 Kim Dec 2003 B2
6686879 Shattil Feb 2004 B2
6690739 Mui Feb 2004 B1
6766342 Kechriotis Jul 2004 B2
6772351 Werner Aug 2004 B1
6839429 Gaikwad Jan 2005 B1
6839587 Yonce Jan 2005 B2
6854030 Perino Feb 2005 B2
6865234 Agazzi Mar 2005 B1
6865236 Terry Mar 2005 B1
6876317 Sankaran Apr 2005 B2
6898724 Chang May 2005 B2
6927709 Kiehl Aug 2005 B2
6954492 Williams Oct 2005 B1
6963622 Eroz Nov 2005 B2
6972701 Jansson Dec 2005 B2
6973613 Cypher Dec 2005 B2
6976194 Cypher Dec 2005 B2
6982954 Dhong Jan 2006 B2
6990138 Bejjani Jan 2006 B2
6993311 Li Jan 2006 B2
6999516 Rajan Feb 2006 B1
7023817 Kuffner Apr 2006 B2
7039136 Olson May 2006 B2
7053802 Cornelius May 2006 B2
7075996 Simon Jul 2006 B2
7080288 Ferraiolo Jul 2006 B2
7082557 Schauer Jul 2006 B2
7085153 Ferrant Aug 2006 B2
7085336 Lee Aug 2006 B2
7127003 Rajan Oct 2006 B2
7130944 Perino Oct 2006 B2
7142612 Horowitz Nov 2006 B2
7142865 Tsai Nov 2006 B2
7164631 Tateishi Jan 2007 B2
7167019 Broyde Jan 2007 B2
7176823 Zabroda Feb 2007 B2
7180949 Kleveland Feb 2007 B2
7184483 Rajan Feb 2007 B2
7199728 Dally Apr 2007 B2
7231558 Gentieu Jun 2007 B2
7269130 Pitio Sep 2007 B2
7269212 Chau Sep 2007 B1
7335976 Chen Feb 2008 B2
7336112 Sha Feb 2008 B1
7339990 Hidaka Mar 2008 B2
7346819 Bansal Mar 2008 B2
7348989 Stevens Mar 2008 B2
7349484 Stojanovic Mar 2008 B2
7356213 Cunningham Apr 2008 B1
7358869 Chiarulli Apr 2008 B1
7362130 Broyde Apr 2008 B2
7362697 Becker Apr 2008 B2
7366942 Lee Apr 2008 B2
7370264 Worley May 2008 B2
7372390 Yamada May 2008 B2
7389333 Moore Jun 2008 B2
7397302 Bardsley Jul 2008 B2
7400276 Sotiriadis Jul 2008 B1
7428273 Foster Sep 2008 B2
7456778 Werner Nov 2008 B2
7462956 Lan Dec 2008 B2
7496162 Srebranig Feb 2009 B2
7570704 Nagarajan Apr 2009 B2
7535957 Ozawa May 2009 B2
7539532 Tran May 2009 B2
7599390 Pamarti Oct 2009 B2
7613234 Raghavan Nov 2009 B2
7616075 Kushiyama Nov 2009 B2
7620116 Bessios Nov 2009 B2
7633850 Nagarajan Dec 2009 B2
7639596 Cioffi Dec 2009 B2
7643588 Visalli Jan 2010 B2
7650525 Chang Jan 2010 B1
7656321 Wang Feb 2010 B2
7694204 Schmidt Apr 2010 B2
7697915 Behzad Apr 2010 B2
7698088 Sul Apr 2010 B2
7706456 Laroia Apr 2010 B2
7706524 Zerbe Apr 2010 B2
7746764 Rawlins Jun 2010 B2
7768312 Hirose Aug 2010 B2
7787572 Scharf Aug 2010 B2
7804361 Lim Sep 2010 B2
7808456 Chen Oct 2010 B2
7808883 Green Oct 2010 B2
7841909 Murray Nov 2010 B2
7869497 Benvenuto Jan 2011 B2
7869546 Tsai Jan 2011 B2
7882413 Chen Feb 2011 B2
7899653 Hollis Mar 2011 B2
7907676 Stojanovic Mar 2011 B2
7933770 Kruger Apr 2011 B2
8000664 Khorram Aug 2011 B2
8030999 Chatterjee Oct 2011 B2
8036300 Evans Oct 2011 B2
8050332 Chung Nov 2011 B2
8055095 Palotai Nov 2011 B2
8064535 Wiley Nov 2011 B2
8085172 Li Dec 2011 B2
8091006 Prasad Jan 2012 B2
8106806 Toyomura Jan 2012 B2
8149906 Saito Apr 2012 B2
8159375 Abbasfar Apr 2012 B2
8159376 Abbasfar Apr 2012 B2
8180931 Lee May 2012 B2
8185807 Oh May 2012 B2
8199849 Oh Jun 2012 B2
8199863 Chen Jun 2012 B2
8218670 AbouRjeily Jul 2012 B2
8233544 Bao Jul 2012 B2
8245094 Jiang Aug 2012 B2
8253454 Lin Aug 2012 B2
8279094 Abbasfar Oct 2012 B2
8279745 Dent Oct 2012 B2
8289914 Li Oct 2012 B2
8295250 Gorokhov Oct 2012 B2
8295336 Lutz Oct 2012 B2
8305247 Pun Nov 2012 B2
8310389 Chui Nov 2012 B1
8341492 Shen Dec 2012 B2
8359445 Ware Jan 2013 B2
8365035 Hara Jan 2013 B2
8406315 Tsai Mar 2013 B2
8406316 Sugita Mar 2013 B2
8429492 Yoon Apr 2013 B2
8429495 Przybylski Apr 2013 B2
8437440 Zhang May 2013 B1
8442099 Sederat May 2013 B1
8442210 Zerbe May 2013 B2
8443223 Abbasfar May 2013 B2
8451913 Oh May 2013 B2
8462891 Kizer Jun 2013 B2
8472513 Malipatil Jun 2013 B2
8620166 Dong Jun 2013 B2
8498344 Wilson Jul 2013 B2
8498368 Husted Jul 2013 B1
8520348 Dong Aug 2013 B2
8520493 Goulahsen Aug 2013 B2
8539318 Cronie Sep 2013 B2
8547272 Nestler Oct 2013 B2
8577284 Seo Nov 2013 B2
8578246 Mittelholzer Nov 2013 B2
8588254 Diab Nov 2013 B2
8588280 Oh Nov 2013 B2
8593305 Tajalli Nov 2013 B1
8602643 Gardiner Dec 2013 B2
8604879 Mourant Dec 2013 B2
8638241 Sudhakaran Jan 2014 B2
8643437 Chiu Feb 2014 B2
8649445 Cronie Feb 2014 B2
8649460 Ware Feb 2014 B2
8674861 Matsuno Mar 2014 B2
8687968 Nosaka Apr 2014 B2
8711919 Kumar Apr 2014 B2
8718184 Cronie May 2014 B1
8744012 Ding Jun 2014 B1
8755426 Cronie Jun 2014 B1
8773964 Hsueh Jul 2014 B2
8780687 Clausen Jul 2014 B2
8782578 Tell Jul 2014 B2
8791735 Shibasaki Jul 2014 B1
8831440 Yu Sep 2014 B2
8841936 Nakamura Sep 2014 B2
8879660 Peng Nov 2014 B1
8897134 Kern Nov 2014 B2
8898504 Baumgartner Nov 2014 B2
8938171 Tang Jan 2015 B2
8949693 Ordentlich Feb 2015 B2
8951072 Hashim Feb 2015 B2
8975948 GonzalezDiaz Mar 2015 B2
8989317 Holden Mar 2015 B1
9015566 Cronie Apr 2015 B2
9020049 Schwager Apr 2015 B2
9036764 Hossain May 2015 B1
9059816 Simpson Jun 2015 B1
9069995 Cronie Jun 2015 B1
9077386 Holden Jul 2015 B1
9083576 Hormati Jul 2015 B1
9093791 Liang Jul 2015 B2
9100232 Hormati Aug 2015 B1
9106465 Walter Aug 2015 B2
9124557 Fox Sep 2015 B2
9148087 Tajalli Sep 2015 B1
9152495 Losh Oct 2015 B2
9165615 Amirkhany Oct 2015 B2
9172412 Kim Oct 2015 B2
9178503 Hsieh Nov 2015 B2
9183085 Northcott Nov 2015 B1
9197470 Okunev Nov 2015 B2
9281785 Sjoland Mar 2016 B2
9288082 Ulrich Mar 2016 B1
9288089 Cronie Mar 2016 B2
9292716 Winoto Mar 2016 B2
9300503 Holden Mar 2016 B1
9306621 Zhang Apr 2016 B2
9331962 Lida May 2016 B2
9362974 Fox Jun 2016 B2
9363114 Shokrollahi Jun 2016 B2
9374250 Musah Jun 2016 B1
9401828 Cronie Jul 2016 B2
9432082 Ulrich Aug 2016 B2
9432298 Smith Aug 2016 B1
9444654 Hormati Sep 2016 B2
9455744 George Sep 2016 B2
9455765 Schumacher Sep 2016 B2
9461862 Holden Oct 2016 B2
9479369 Shokrollahi Oct 2016 B1
9509437 Shokrollahi Nov 2016 B2
9520883 Shibasaki Dec 2016 B2
9544015 Ulrich Jan 2017 B2
9634797 Benammar Apr 2017 B2
9667379 Cronie May 2017 B2
9917711 Ulrich Mar 2018 B2
20010006538 Simon Jul 2001 A1
20010055344 Lee Dec 2001 A1
20020034191 Shattil Mar 2002 A1
20020044316 Myers Apr 2002 A1
20020057592 Robb May 2002 A1
20020149508 Hamashita Oct 2002 A1
20020154633 Shin Oct 2002 A1
20020158789 Yoshioka Oct 2002 A1
20020163881 Dhong Nov 2002 A1
20020167339 Chang Nov 2002 A1
20020174373 Chang Nov 2002 A1
20020181607 Izumi Dec 2002 A1
20030016763 Doi Jan 2003 A1
20030016770 Trans Jan 2003 A1
20030046618 Collins Mar 2003 A1
20030085763 Schrodinger May 2003 A1
20030146783 Bandy Aug 2003 A1
20030160749 Tsuchi Aug 2003 A1
20030174023 Miyasita Sep 2003 A1
20030185310 Ketchum Oct 2003 A1
20030218558 Mulder Nov 2003 A1
20040027185 Fiedler Feb 2004 A1
20040146117 Subramaniam Jul 2004 A1
20040155802 Lamy Aug 2004 A1
20040161019 Raghavan Aug 2004 A1
20040169529 Afghahi Sep 2004 A1
20040170231 Bessios Sep 2004 A1
20050057379 Jansson Mar 2005 A1
20050063493 Foster Mar 2005 A1
20050134380 Nairn Jun 2005 A1
20050149833 Worley Jul 2005 A1
20050174841 Ho Aug 2005 A1
20050195000 Parker Sep 2005 A1
20050201491 Wei Sep 2005 A1
20050213686 Love Sep 2005 A1
20050220182 Kuwata Oct 2005 A1
20050270098 Zhang Dec 2005 A1
20060036668 Jaussi Feb 2006 A1
20060097786 Su May 2006 A1
20060103463 Lee May 2006 A1
20060120486 Visalli Jun 2006 A1
20060126751 Bessios Jun 2006 A1
20060133538 Stojanovic Jun 2006 A1
20060140324 Casper Jun 2006 A1
20060159005 Rawlins Jul 2006 A1
20060232461 Felder Oct 2006 A1
20060233291 Garlepp Oct 2006 A1
20060291589 Eliezer Dec 2006 A1
20070001723 Lin Jan 2007 A1
20070002954 Cornelius Jan 2007 A1
20070030796 Green Feb 2007 A1
20070076871 Renes Apr 2007 A1
20070103338 Teo May 2007 A1
20070121716 Nagarajan May 2007 A1
20070176708 Otsuka Aug 2007 A1
20070182487 Ozasa Aug 2007 A1
20070188367 Yamada Aug 2007 A1
20070201546 Lee Aug 2007 A1
20070201597 He Aug 2007 A1
20070204205 Niu Aug 2007 A1
20070263711 Kramer Nov 2007 A1
20070283210 Prasad Dec 2007 A1
20080007367 Kim Jan 2008 A1
20080012598 Mayer Jan 2008 A1
20080104374 Mohamed May 2008 A1
20080159448 Anim-Appiah Jul 2008 A1
20080187037 Bulzacchelli Aug 2008 A1
20080192621 Suehiro Aug 2008 A1
20080317188 Staszewski Dec 2008 A1
20090059782 Cole Mar 2009 A1
20090090333 Spadafora Apr 2009 A1
20090115523 Akizuki May 2009 A1
20090154604 Lee Jun 2009 A1
20090193159 Li Jul 2009 A1
20090195281 Tamura Aug 2009 A1
20090262876 Arima Oct 2009 A1
20090316730 Feng Dec 2009 A1
20090323864 Tired Dec 2009 A1
20100046644 Mazet Feb 2010 A1
20100081451 Mueck Apr 2010 A1
20100148819 Bae Jun 2010 A1
20100156691 Taft Jun 2010 A1
20100180143 Ware Jul 2010 A1
20100215087 Tsai Aug 2010 A1
20100215112 Tsai Aug 2010 A1
20100235673 Abbasfar Sep 2010 A1
20100271107 Tran Oct 2010 A1
20100283894 Horan Nov 2010 A1
20100296556 Rave Nov 2010 A1
20100309964 Oh Dec 2010 A1
20100329325 Mobin Dec 2010 A1
20110014865 Seo Jan 2011 A1
20110028089 Komori Feb 2011 A1
20110032977 Hsiao Feb 2011 A1
20110051854 Kizer Mar 2011 A1
20110072330 Kolze Mar 2011 A1
20110074488 Broyde Mar 2011 A1
20110084737 Oh Apr 2011 A1
20110103508 Mu May 2011 A1
20110127990 Wilson Jun 2011 A1
20110228864 Aryanfar Sep 2011 A1
20110235501 Goulahsen Sep 2011 A1
20110268225 Cronie Nov 2011 A1
20110299555 Cronie Dec 2011 A1
20110302478 Cronie Dec 2011 A1
20110317559 Kern Dec 2011 A1
20120044021 Yeh Feb 2012 A1
20120082203 Zerbe Apr 2012 A1
20120133438 Tsuchi May 2012 A1
20120152901 Nagorny Jun 2012 A1
20120161945 Single Jun 2012 A1
20120213299 Cronie Aug 2012 A1
20120257683 Schwager Oct 2012 A1
20130010892 Cronie Jan 2013 A1
20130013870 Cronie Jan 2013 A1
20130088274 Gu Apr 2013 A1
20130106513 Cyrusian May 2013 A1
20130114519 Gaal May 2013 A1
20130114663 Ding May 2013 A1
20130129019 Sorrells May 2013 A1
20130147553 Iwamoto Jun 2013 A1
20130188656 Ferraiolo Jul 2013 A1
20130195155 Pan Aug 2013 A1
20130202065 Chmelar Aug 2013 A1
20130215954 Beukema Aug 2013 A1
20130259113 Kumar Oct 2013 A1
20130271194 Pellerano Oct 2013 A1
20130307614 Dai Nov 2013 A1
20130314142 Tamura Nov 2013 A1
20130315501 Atanassov Nov 2013 A1
20130346830 Ordentlich Dec 2013 A1
20140159769 Hong Jun 2014 A1
20140177645 Cronie Jun 2014 A1
20140177696 Hwang Jun 2014 A1
20140254642 Fox Sep 2014 A1
20140266440 Itagaki Sep 2014 A1
20140269130 Maeng Sep 2014 A1
20140286381 Shibasaki Sep 2014 A1
20150049798 Hossein Feb 2015 A1
20150070201 Dedic Mar 2015 A1
20150078479 Whitby-Strevens Mar 2015 A1
20150117579 Shibasaki Apr 2015 A1
20150146771 Walter May 2015 A1
20150198647 Atwood Jul 2015 A1
20150222458 Hormati Aug 2015 A1
20150249559 Shokrollahi Sep 2015 A1
20150256326 Simpson Sep 2015 A1
20150333940 Shokrollahi Nov 2015 A1
20150349835 Fox Dec 2015 A1
20150380087 Mittelholzer Dec 2015 A1
20150381232 Ulrich Dec 2015 A1
20160020796 Hormati Jan 2016 A1
20160020824 Ulrich Jan 2016 A1
20160036616 Holden Feb 2016 A1
20160197747 Ulrich Jul 2016 A1
20160261435 Musah Sep 2016 A1
20170310456 Tajalli Oct 2017 A1
20170317449 Shokrollahi Nov 2017 A1
20170317855 Shokrollahi Nov 2017 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (10)
Number Date Country
1671092 Sep 2005 CN
1864346 Nov 2006 CN
101478286 Jul 2009 CN
1926267 May 2008 EP
2039221 Feb 2013 EP
2003163612 Jun 2003 JP
2005002162 Jan 2005 WO
2009084121 Jul 2009 WO
2010031824 Mar 2010 WO
2011119359 Sep 2011 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (58)
Entry
Oh et al., Pseudo-Differential Vector Signaling for Noise Reduction in Single-Ended Signaling, DesignCon 2009, pg.
Schneider, J. et al., “ELEC301 Project: Building an Analog Computer”, Dec. 19, 1999, http://www.clear.rice.edu/elec301/Projects99/anlgcomp/, pp. 1-9.
“Introduction to: Analog Computers and the DSPACE System,” Course Material ECE 5230 Spring 2008, Utah State University, www.coursehero.com, 12 pages.
Abbasfar, A., “Generalized Differential Vector Signaling”, IEEE International Conference on Communications, ICC '09, (Jun. 14, 2009), pp. 1-5.
Brown, L., et al., “V.92: The Last Dial-Up Modem?”, IEEE Transactions on Communications, IEEE Service Center, Piscataway, NJ., USA, vol. 52, No. 1, Jan. 1, 2004, pp. 54-61. XP011106836, ISSN: 0090-6779, DOI: 10.1109/tcomm.2003.822168, pp. 55-59.
Burr, “Spherical Codes for M-ARY Code Shift Keying”, University of York, Apr. 2, 1989, pp. 67-72, United Kingdom.
Cheng, W., “Memory Bus Encoding for Low Power: A Tutorial”, Quality Electronic Design, IEEE, International Symposium on Mar. 26-28, 2001, pp. 199-204, Piscataway, NJ.
Clayton, P., “Introduction to Electromagnetic Compatibility”, Wiley-Interscience, 2006.
Counts, L., et al., “One-Chip Slide Rule Works with Logs, Antilogs for Real-Time Processing,” Analog Devices Computational Products 6, Reprinted from Electronic Design, May 2, 1985, 7 pages.
Dasilva et al., “Multicarrier Orthogonal CDMA Signals for Quasi-Synchronous Communication Systems”, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 12, No. 5 (Jun. 1, 1994), pp. 842-852.
Design Brief 208 Using the Anadigm Multiplier CAM, Copyright 2002 Anadigm, 6 pages.
Ericson, T., et al., “Spherical Codes Generated by Binary Partitions of Symmetric Pointsets”, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol. 41, No. 1, Jan. 1995, pp. 107-129.
Farzan, K., et al., “Coding Schemes for Chip-to-Chip Interconnect Applications”, IEEE Transactions on Very Large Scale Integration (VLSI) Systems, vol. 14, No. 4, Apr. 2006, pp. 393-406.
Grahame, J., “Vintage Analog Computer Kits,” posted on Aug. 25, 2006 in Classic Computing, 2 pages, http.//www.retrothing.com/2006/08/classic_analog_.html.
Healey, A., et al., “A Comparison of 25 Gbps NRZ & PAM-4 Modulation used in Legacy & Premium Backplane Channels”, DesignCon 2012, 16 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/EP2011/059279 dated Sep. 22, 2011.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/EP2011/074219 dated Jul. 4, 2012.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/EP2012/052767 dated May 11, 2012.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US14/052986 dated Nov. 24, 2014.
International Search Report and Written Opinion from PCT/US2014/034220 dated Aug. 21, 2014.
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, dated Jul. 14, 2011 in International Patent Application S.N. PCT/EP2011/002170, 10 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, dated Nov. 5, 2012, in International Patent Application S.N. PCT/EP2012/052767, 7 pages.
International Search Report for PCT/US2014/053563, dated Nov. 11, 2014, 2 pages.
Jiang, A., et al., “Rank Modulation for Flash Memories”, IEEE Transactions of Information Theory, Jun. 2006, vol. 55, No. 6, pp. 2659-2673.
Loh, M., et al., “A 3×9 Gb/s Shared, All-Digital CDR for High-Speed, High-Density I/O”, Matthew Loh, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 47, No. 3, Mar. 2012.
Notification of Transmittal of International Search Report and The Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, for PCT/US2015/018363, dated Jun. 18, 2015, 13 pages.
Notification of Transmittal of The International Search Report and The Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration for PCT/EP2013/002681, dated Feb. 25, 2014, 15 pages.
Notification of Transmittal of The International Search Report and The Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration, dated Mar. 3, 2015, for PCT/US2014/066893, 9 pages.
Notification of Transmittal of The International Search Report and The Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration, for PCT/US2014/015840, dated May 20, 2014. 11 pages.
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration, for PCT/US2014/043965, dated Oct. 22, 2014, 10 pages.
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration, for PCT/US2015/037466, dated Nov. 19, 2015.
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and The Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration, for PCT/US2015/039952, dated Sep. 23, 2015, 8 pages.
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration, for PCT/US2015/041161, dated Oct. 7, 2015, 8 pages.
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration, for PCT/US2015/043463, dated Oct. 16, 2015, 8 pages.
Oh, et al., Pseudo-Differential Vector Signaling for Noise Reduction in Single-Ended Signaling, DesignCon 2009.
Poulton, et al., “Multiwire Differential Signaling”, UNC-CH Department of Computer Science Version 1.1, Aug. 6, 2003.
Schneider, J., et al., “ELEC301 Project: Building an Analog Computer,” Dec. 19, 1999, 8 pages, http://www.clear.rice.edu/elec301/Projects99/anlgcomp/.
She et al., “A Framework of Cross-Layer Superposition Coded Multicast for Robust IPTV Services over WiMAX,” IEEE Communications Society subject matter experts for publication in the WCNC 2008 proceedings, Mar. 31, 2008-Apr. 3, 2008, pp. 3139-3144.
Skliar et al., A Method for the Analysis of Signals: The Square-Wave Method, Mar. 2008, Revista de Matematica: Teoria y Aplicationes, pp. 109-129.
Slepian, D., “Prennutation Modulation”, IEEE, vol. 52, No. 3, Mar. 1965, pp. 228-236.
Stan, M., et al., “Bus-Invert Coding for Low-Power I/O, IEEE Transactions on Very Large Scale Integration (VLSI) Systems”, vol. 3, No. 1, Mar. 1995, pp. 49-58.
Tallini, L., et al., “Transmission Time Analysis for the Parallel Asynchronous Communication Scheme”, IEEE Transactions on Computers, vol. 52, No. 5, May 2003, pp. 558-571.
Tierney, J., et al., “A digital frequency synthesizer,” Audio and Electroacoustics, IEEE Transactions, Mar. 1971, pp. 48-57, vol. 19, Issue 1, 1 page Abstract from http://ieeexplore.
Wang et al., “Applying CDMA Technique to Network-on-Chip”, IEEE Transactions on Very Large Scale Integration (VLSI) Systems, vol. 15, No. 10 (Oct. 1, 2007), pp. 1091-1100.
Zouhair Ben-Neticha et al, “The 'streTched”-Golay and other codes for high-SNR fnite-delay quantization of the Gaussian source at 1/2 Bit per sample, IEEE Transactions on Communications, vol. 38, No. 12 Dec. 1, 1990, pp. 2089-2093, XP000203339, ISSN: 0090-6678, DOI: 10.1109/26.64647.
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and The Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration, dated Feb. 15, 2017, 10 pages.
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration., for PCT/US17/14997, dated Apr. 7, 2017.
Holden, B., “Simulation results for NRZ, ENRZ & PAM-4 on 16-wire full-sized 400GE backplanes”, IEEE 802.3 400GE Study Group, Sep. 2, 2013, 19 pages, www.ieee802.0rg/3/400GSG/publiv/13_09/holden_400_01_0913.pdf.
Holden, B., “An exploration of the technical feasibility of the major technology options for 400GE backplanes”, IEEE 802.3 400GE Study Group, Jul. 16, 2013, 18 pages, http://ieee802.org/3/400GSG/public/13_07/holden_400_01_0713.pdf.
Holden, B., “Using Ensemble NRZ Coding for 400GE Electrical Interfaces”, IEEE 802.3 400GE Study Group, May 17, 2013, 24 pages, http://www.ieee802.org/3/400GSG/public/13_05/holden_400_01_0513.pdf.
Reza Navid et al, “A 40 Gb/s Serial Link Transceiver in 28 nm CMOS Technology”, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 50, No. 4. Apr. 2015, pp. 814-827.
Linten, D. et al, “T-Diodes—A Novel Plus-and-Play Wideband RF Circuit ESD Protection Methodology” EOS/ESD Symposium 07, pp. 242-249.
Hyosup Won et al, “A 28-Gb/s Receiver With Self-contained Adaptive Equalization and Sampling Point Control Using Stochastic Sigma-Tracking Eye-Opening Monitor”, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems-I: Regular Papers, vol. 64, No. 3, Mar. 2017. pp. 664-674.
Giovaneli, et al., “Space-frequency coded OFDM system for multi-wire power line communications”, Power Line Communications and Its Applications, 20015 International Symposium on Vancouver, BC, Canada, Apr. 6-8, 2005, Piscataway, NJ, pp. 191-195.
Farzan, et al., “Coding Schemes for Chip-to-Chip Interconnect Applications”, IEEE Transactions on Very Large Scale Integration (VLSI) Systems, vol. 14, pp. 393-406, Apr. 2006.
Anonymous, “Constant-weight code”, Wikipedia.org, retrieved on Jun. 2, 2017.
Shibasaki, et al., “A 56-Gb/s Receiver Front-End with a CTLE and 1-Tap DFE in 20-nm CMOS”, IEEE 2014 Symposium on VLSI Circuits Digest of Technical Papers, 2 pgs.
Hidaka, et al., “A 4-Channel 1.25-10.3 Gb/s Backplane Transceiver Macro With35 dB Equalizer and Sign-Based Zero-Forcing Adaptive Control”, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 44 No. 12, Dec. 2009, pp. 3547-3559.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20180069733 A1 Mar 2018 US
Continuations (3)
Number Date Country
Parent 15271065 Sep 2016 US
Child 15812917 US
Parent 15070911 Mar 2016 US
Child 15271065 US
Parent 13895206 May 2013 US
Child 15070911 US