The present disclosure relates generally to cutting systems and more particularly to circular saw blades such as circular saw blades for lumber mills and methods of making circular saw blades.
Circular saw systems for lumber mills are described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,285,302 and 3,623,520, incorporated herein by reference for background only. These patents describe gang saws having guide arms with wear pads formed of babbitt metal. The guide arms and wear pads improve the accuracy of the cut and reduce the size of the kerf by preventing the saw blade cutting edge from wandering laterally. The wear pads abut opposing sides of the blade radially inward from the outer margin of the blade where the cutting teeth are distributed. In conventional circular saw systems, sawdust spillage along the sides of the saw blade causes friction that tends to increase the temperature of its outer margin, which increases internal stresses that may cause the cutting edge to deviate laterally. Moreover, the gullets between the cutting teeth tend to wear over time, which increases sawdust spillage and exacerbates blade deviation. In some circumstances, an unacceptable amount of lateral deviation of the cutting edge occurs after only a few hours of operation.
According to one embodiment, a thermal barrier coating is applied to an outer margin of a circular saw blade to inhibit abrupt increases in temperature of the outer margin during cutting operation. The thermal barrier coating may be applied on opposing major surfaces of the circular saw blade in the outer margin. For example, the thermal barrier coating may cover opposing major surfaces of the cutting teeth. The thermal barrier coating may also cover the cutting edges of the cutting teeth and the blade tooth gullets that separate the cutting teeth. The thermal barrier coating may include a carbide and/or an oxide, and may be applied by using a plasma spray process or another coating process.
Additional aspects and advantages will be apparent from the following detailed description of preferred embodiments, which proceeds with reference to the accompanying drawings.
With reference to the above-listed drawings, this section describes particular embodiments and their detailed construction and operation. The embodiments described herein are set forth by way of illustration only and not limitation. Those skilled in the art will recognize in light of the teachings herein that there is a range of equivalents to the example embodiments described herein. Most notably, other embodiments are possible, variations can be made to the embodiments described herein, and there may be equivalents to the components, parts, or steps that make up the described embodiments.
For the sake of clarity and conciseness, certain aspects of components or steps of certain embodiments are presented without undue detail where such detail would be apparent to those skilled in the art in light of the teachings herein and/or where such detail would obfuscate an understanding of more pertinent aspects of the embodiments.
According to one embodiment, a thermal barrier coating is applied to selected areas of a circular saw blade to inhibit the areas from heating up during cutting operation. For example, the thermal barrier coating is applied on opposing major surfaces of the circular saw blade at its outer margin to inhibit abrupt increases in temperature of the outer margin during cutting operation, which, in turn, inhibits the outer margin from deviating laterally. The circular saw blade may be used in a number of different applications including gang saws for lumber mills.
Blade 100 includes multiple cutting teeth 104 and blade tooth gullets 106 located in an outer margin 108, which is outboard of a region of contact 110 (area between lines 112 and 114) of wear pads 116 of guide arms 118. Although guide arms 118 and wear pads 116 are depicted in
Thermal barrier coating 120 may be deposited in a ring, as shown in
Preferably, thermal barrier coating 120 includes a ceramic material. Suitable ceramic materials may include carbides, oxides, cermets, mullites, and combinations thereof. Examples of suitable carbides and/or cermets include WC—Co—Cr (example percentages 86/10/4), WC—Ni (example percentages 88/12), WC—CrC—Ni (example percentages 73/20/7), WC—Co (example percentages 88/12), Cr3C2—NiCr (example percentages 75/25), Mo2C, WC—Co—NiSF, TiC, and Cr3C2. Examples of suitable oxides include Cr2O3 (e.g., 99.5% pure), Cr2O3—TiO2 (example percentages 80/20), Cr2O3—TiO2—SiO2 (example percentages 92/3/5), Al2O3, Al2O3—TiO2 (example percentages 97/3), and ZrO2. In one example, thermal barrier coating 120 includes a spherical, hollow micro-balloon shaped mullite clad with nickel. Other ceramics such as nitrides, borides, and silicides may also be used for thermal barrier coating 120. In one example, thermal barrier coating 120 is relatively smooth and non-abrasive unlike coatings on tools used to grind and/or cut concrete, brick, metal, and other hard materials. Thermal barrier coating 120 may have a surface roughness in the range of about 0.2 to 10 μm Ra. In one example, thermal barrier coating 120 has a surface roughness below about 6 μm Ra. In another example, thermal barrier coating 120 has a surface roughness in a range from about 4 to 6 μm Ra. Surface roughness measurements are typically taken with a profilometer in accordance with a standard such as ISO 4287.
Blade 100, including the blade edges, may be stressed or tensioned so internal stresses at outer margin 108 are normally different than the internal stresses of the central regions (e.g., central portion 126, region of contact 110) of blade 100 when blade 100 is in a non-rotating state (i.e., when blade 100 is not spinning). For example, outer margin 108 may be put under tension by loosening or stretching the central regions of the blade 100 using hammering and/or rolling techniques (i.e., working the blade 100) prior to or after coating blade 100. Blade 100 may be tensioned to operate at a particular cutting speed. Blade 100 may be susceptible to temperature changes during use. For example, with an un-coated saw blade, sawdust chips that are smaller than the side clearance (e.g., (kerf size k−blade thickness w)/2) of the blade may spill out of the gullets onto opposing major surfaces of the outer margin causing it to heat up and deviate laterally due to expansion of the outer margin. In contrast, thermal barrier coating 120 provides a thermal barrier layer that inhibits abrupt increases in temperature of the metal blade core at outer margin 108 that may otherwise result in an imbalance in internal blade stresses leading to lateral deviation of the outer margin 108. Reduced deviation of outer margin 108 reduces the kerf size k cut by the blade 100 and/or helps to maintain a relatively straight cut, thereby improving cutting accuracy and reducing waste. Reduced deviation also reduces sawdust spillage from gullets 106, thereby reducing friction and blade wear, and associated blade changes and equipment downtime. In one example, thermal barrier coating 120 has a thermal conductivity below that of steel. In another example, thermal barrier coating 120 has a thermal conductivity below about 120 watts per meter-kelvin W/(mK). In another example, thermal barrier coating 120 has a thermal conductivity below about 85 W/(mK). In another example, thermal barrier coating 120 has a thermal conductivity below about 50 W/(mK). In another example, thermal barrier coating 120 has a thermal conductivity below about 30 W/(mK). In another example, thermal barrier coating 120 has a thermal conductivity below about 20 W/(mK). In another example, thermal barrier coating 120 has a thermal conductivity below about 10 W/(mK). In another example, thermal barrier coating 120 has a thermal conductivity in a range from about 0.35-1.0 W/(mK).
In addition to providing a thermal barrier, thermal barrier coating 120 may also provide a wear coating for cutting teeth 104 and gullet edges 106′. For example, thermal barrier coating 120 may inhibit gullet edges 106′ from wearing down over time to thereby reduce sawdust spillage and friction. Moreover, thermal barrier coating 120 may be sufficiently strong and well bonded to blade 100 to withstand wearing away from opposing major surfaces 122 and 124 over time so that blade 100 may continue to provide thermal protection for outer margin 108 even after extended use. For example, thermal barrier coating 120 may have a hardness in a range from about 1000 to 1500 in the Vickers hardness scale. In one example, thermal barrier coating 120 has a hardness in a range from about 1250 to 1350 in the Vickers hardness scale. In another example, thermal barrier coating 120 has a hardness in a range from about 1300 to 1400 in the Vickers hardness scale, and in another example thermal barrier coating 120 has a hardness in a range from about 1100 to 1200 in the Vickers hardness scale.
After step 504 or step 506, thermal barrier coating 120 is applied on outer margin 108 (step 508). For example, a plasma spray process may be used in which a plasma gas such as argon, nitrogen, hydrogen or a mixture thereof that is inert to the materials that will form thermal barrier coating 120 is dissociated and accelerated in a nozzle of a plasma gun (also called a plasma arc or plasma torch) through expansion to thereby generate a plasma gas stream (also called a plasma flame). The plasma gas stream is directed toward a deposition site at outer margin 108. A powder (e.g., carbide powder, oxide powder, mullite powder) is introduced into the plasma gas stream and high temperatures (e.g., up to 20,000 K) of the plasma gas stream melt the powder, and the melted powder is propelled toward the deposition site. The melted powder impacts the deposition site to form thermal barrier coating 120. The nozzle of the plasma gun may be moveable (e.g., via a robotic control system) to provide an even coat on blade 100. Moreover, blade 100 may be rotated on the arbor in concert with movement of the plasma gun to evenly coat gullet edges 106′, opposing major surfaces 122 and 124, and cutting edges 104′. The plasma spray process provides good bond strength for thermal barrier coating 120 and allows a thin, even coat to be applied. For example, the ceramic coating 102 may have a thickness from about 10 μm to about 500 μm. In one example, the thermal barrier coating 120 has a thickness a range from about 35 to 255 μm. In another example, the thermal barrier coating 120 has a thickness of in a range from about 50 to 70 μm.
Thermal barrier coating 120 is capable of significantly reducing lateral deviation of the outer margin 108 during cutting operation. For example, a first gang of 10 un-coated saw blades and a second gang of 10 coated saw blades were used to cut Douglas fir wood. The saw blade specifications and operating conditions for each of the first and second gangs of saw blades are listed in the following table:
The thermal barrier coating 120 on the blades of the second gang included WC—Co—Cr (86/10/4) and was applied to outer margins 108 of the blades using a plasma spray process. The thermal barrier coating 120 was approximately 64 μm thick per side and covered the opposing major surfaces 122′ and 124′ of the blade teeth 104 from their outermost edges 104″ to approximately 0.64 cm radially inward from the gullet edges 106′. The thermal barrier coating 120 also covered the gullet edges 106′ and the cutting edges 104′ of the cutting teeth 104.
After approximately two hours of continuous run time, the outer margins of the blades of gang 1 deviated laterally or wobbled side-to-side by unacceptable amounts producing a wider kerf size k, a crooked cut, or both. In some applications, a kerf size k that increases by more than about 0.5 to 1.3 mm is unacceptable. Moreover, in some applications, cuts that deviated by more than about ±0.25 to 0.63 mm from their nominal positions are unacceptable. After two hours the blades of gang 1 needed to be changed, which required approximately 20 minutes of unscheduled equipment downtime, or approximately 80 minutes of downtime on average for a ten-hour shift. The blades also required extra maintenance work to re-level and re-tension them for future runs.
On the other hand, the coated blades of gang 2 operated continuously for a ten-hour shift, during which the kerf size k and lateral deviations of the cuts remained within acceptable ranges. Acceptable ranges for lateral deviation of a cut and an increase in kerf size k may depend on the type of application in which blade 100 is used. In some applications, lateral deviation of a cut of less than about ±0.25 mm from its nominal position may be acceptable. In one example, the lateral deviation of a cut from its nominal position may be less than about ±0.13 mm, and in another example, the lateral deviation may be less than about ±0.064 mm. Moreover, in some applications an increase in the kerf size k of less than about 0.5 mm may be acceptable. In one example, an increase in the kerf size k of less than about 0.25 mm may be acceptable, an in another example, an increase in the kerf size k of less than about 0.13 mm may be acceptable. After the shift, the coated blades needed no extra maintenance work aside from standard re-sharpening of the cutting edges 104′. Accordingly, the coated blades were able to prevent a substantial amount of unscheduled equipment downtime and blade repair time.
It will be obvious to skilled persons the art that many changes may be made to the details of the above-described embodiments without departing from the underlying principles of the invention. The scope of the present invention should, therefore, be determined only by the following claims.
This application claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. §119(e) of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/115,885, filed Nov. 18, 2008, which is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61115885 | Nov 2008 | US |