The present disclosure relates to radio frequency (RF) circulators and in particular to three-port circulators employed by RF front ends to route RF signals to and from antennas.
In radio frequency (RF) transceiver systems, a magnetic circulator is frequently used to enable simultaneous signal transmission and reception over a single antenna. The magnetic circulator routes the signals between a transmit (TX) port, an antenna port, and a receive (RX) port while providing isolation between the TX port and the RX port. The magnetic circulator includes a permanent magnet that causes signals to pass through its material along one direction, such that signals travel from the TX port to the antenna port and from the antenna port to the RX port. Practical circulators undesirably allow some transmitter power to leak from the TX port to the RX port. What is needed is a circulator system that reduces the undesired leakage of transmitter power into the RX port.
An apparatus is disclosed having a circulator having a transmit port, a receive port, and a tuner port with tuner circuitry coupled between the tuner port and an antenna port. At least one analog control branch is coupled between the receive port and at least one control input of the tuner circuitry to generate at least one control signal from a transmit leakage signal leaking into the receive port. The tuner circuitry is configured to respond to the at least one control signal by automatically electronically tuning such that a cancellation signal of substantially equal amplitude and opposite phase of that of the transmit leakage signal is reflected through the tuner port and into the receive port, thereby reducing the transmit leakage signal to a level corresponding to an isolation of at least −30 dB between the transmit port and the receive port.
Those skilled in the art will appreciate the scope of the present disclosure and realize additional aspects thereof after reading the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments in association with the accompanying drawing figures.
The accompanying drawing figures incorporated in and forming a part of this specification illustrate several aspects of the disclosure and, together with the description, serve to explain the principles of the disclosure.
The embodiments set forth below represent the necessary information to enable those skilled in the art to practice the embodiments and illustrate the best mode of practicing the embodiments. Upon reading the following description in light of the accompanying drawing figures, those skilled in the art will understand the concepts of the disclosure and will recognize applications of these concepts not particularly addressed herein. It should be understood that these concepts and applications fall within the scope of the disclosure and the accompanying claims.
It will be understood that, although the terms first, second, etc. may be used herein to describe various elements, these elements should not be limited by these terms. These terms are only used to distinguish one element from another. For example, a first element could be termed a second element, and, similarly, a second element could be termed a first element, without departing from the scope of the present disclosure. As used herein, the term “and/or” includes any and all combinations of one or more of the associated listed items.
It will be understood that when an element such as a layer, region, or substrate is referred to as being “on” or extending “onto” another element, it can be directly on or extend directly onto the other element or intervening elements may also be present. In contrast, when an element is referred to as being “directly on” or extending “directly onto” another element, there are no intervening elements present. Likewise, it will be understood that when an element such as a layer, region, or substrate is referred to as being “over” or extending “over” another element, it can be directly over or extend directly over the other element or intervening elements may also be present. In contrast, when an element is referred to as being “directly over” or extending “directly over” another element, there are no intervening elements present. It will also be understood that when an element is referred to as being “connected” or “coupled” to another element, it can be directly connected or coupled to the other element or intervening elements may be present. In contrast, when an element is referred to as being “directly connected” or “directly coupled” to another element, there are no intervening elements present.
Relative terms such as “below” or “above” or “upper” or “lower” or “horizontal” or “vertical” may be used herein to describe a relationship of one element, layer, or region to another element, layer, or region as illustrated in the Figures. It will be understood that these terms and those discussed above are intended to encompass different orientations of the device in addition to the orientation depicted in the Figures.
The terminology used herein is for the purpose of describing particular embodiments only and is not intended to be limiting of the disclosure. As used herein, the singular forms “a,” “an,” and “the” are intended to include the plural forms as well, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. It will be further understood that the terms “comprises,” “comprising,” “includes,” and/or “including” when used herein specify the presence of stated features, integers, steps, operations, elements, and/or components, but do not preclude the presence or addition of one or more other features, integers, steps, operations, elements, components, and/or groups thereof.
Unless otherwise defined, all terms (including technical and scientific terms) used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which this disclosure belongs. It will be further understood that terms used herein should be interpreted as having a meaning that is consistent with their meaning in the context of this specification and the relevant art and will not be interpreted in an idealized or overly formal sense unless expressly so defined herein. For the purpose of this disclosure a natural number is defined as a counting number that does not include infinity.
In attempts to mitigate the problems set forth above, existing methods for improving isolation between the TX port 14 and the RX port 16 generally sample some transmit power from the TX port 14 by coupling a signal representing the transmit power, adjusting the amplitude and phase of the signal, and injecting the signal into the RX port 16 to cancel leaks of transmit power that undesirably pass into the RX port 16. Thus, existing methods require very precise phase and amplitude adjustments, thereby reducing the effectiveness of digitally controlled components that do not have enough bits of resolution to provide a desired level of transmit power leakage cancellation. Moreover, there can be significant electrical length between TX port 14, RX port 16, and antenna port 22, which presents challenges to achieving a wide bandwidth response. Further still, a feedback cancellation loop between the TX port 14 and RX port 16 may not be able to compensate for unmatched antenna impedance. However, given the issue of non-ideal and potentially varying antenna impedance, the antenna tuner 20 is generally necessary and is adjusted to transform the impedance of the antenna 24 to a complex reflection coefficient γ. The antenna tuner 20 is assumed to be lossless for the following mathematical modeling.
A symmetric three-port circulator such as the circulator 12 has an s-parameter matrix of the form shown below where α, β and Γ are complex loss, isolation, and reflection coefficients, respectively, that characterize the circulator 12. As depicted in
Expanding this matrix results in the following set of three simultaneous equations:
b1=Γa1+βa2+αa3 EQ. 1a
b2=αa1+Γa2+βa3 EQ. 1b
b3=βa1+αa2+Γa3 EQ. 1c
Referring to
b2=αa1+Γa2 EQ. 2a
b3=βa1+αa2 EQ. 2b
As shown in
The complex isolation coefficient of the circulator 12 with the antenna tuner 20 is found by solving Eq. (3b).
The cancellation method of this disclosure is to set the tuner input reflection coefficient γ to a value that results in perfect isolation, that is, EQ. 4 being equal to zero. Setting EQ. 4 equal to zero and solving for γ produces the reflection coefficient required from the tuner to achieve perfect cancellation of the TX leakage signal. The result is shown below in EQ. 5.
To test the cancellation method of this disclosure, loss, isolation, and match data for a surface mount circulator were measured and are plotted in
Using the tuner gamma values from
This disclosure provides circuit architectures that implement the present method for simultaneously cancelling transmit leakage power at the RX port 16 of the circulator 12 and correcting for non-unity antenna voltage standing wave ratio (VSWR). As illustrated in
As further shown in
In the exemplary embodiment of
The sensitivity to tuner bias voltage, or alternatively tuner capacitance, is a consequence of cancelling signals to 45 dB or below. An acceptable level of tuning an antenna such as antenna 24 might be 20-25 dB, which can be accomplished with digitally controlled switched capacitor banks. Such components are readily available and widely used in mobile devices. However, the smallest capacitance step available in these components is far too large to consistently achieve the precise capacitance settings required for cancellation of TX leakage signal to a 45 dB or higher level. Furthermore, for embodiments of this disclosure to be practical, analog detection and control of the tuner bias voltages will likely be required. Continuously variable analog varactors, such as BST varactors, are more practical for demanding applications. However, it is to be understood that other components, such as electrically tunable radio frequency inductors with analog control in other impedance matching network topologies, may be substituted for variable analog varactors without deviating from the scope of the present disclosure.
A more detailed exemplary embodiment of the enhanced circulator system 26 is depicted in
Typically, voltage levels output from the amplifier output of the first operational amplifier 34-1 are too low to drive a typical 1-24 V bias range of the BST varactors, which in the embodiment of the tuner circuitry 28 are first varactor CV1 and the second varactor CV2 through the Nth varactor CVN. As such, a first BST driver 36-1 depicted in the exemplary embodiment of
The input stage 38 is coupled to the output stage 40 through a diode string 42. The input stage is made up of a first transistor M1 having a drain coupled to a high voltage node that in this exemplary case is fixed at 25 V. A gate of the first transistor M1 is coupled to a drain of a second transistor M2 with a source of the first transistor M1 being coupled to the drain of the second transistor M2 through a first resistor R1. A second resistor R2 is coupled between the input port VIN that couples to the output port of the operational amplifier 34-1 (
The output stage 40 includes a third transistor M3 having a drain coupled to the high voltage node that is fixed at 25 V. A gate of the third transistor M3 is coupled to a drain of a fourth transistor M4 with a source of the third transistor M3 being coupled to the drain of the fourth transistor M4 through a fourth resistor R4. The drain of the fourth transistor M4 functions as the output port VOUT that is coupled to the tuner bias port that receives the bias voltage VC2. A source of the fourth transistor M4 is coupled to a fixed voltage node such as ground. A fifth resistor R5 is coupled between a cathode of the last diode of the diode string 42 and the gate of the fourth transistor M4. The cathode of the last diode of the diode string 42 is also coupled to a negative voltage node through a sixth resistor R6. In the exemplary embodiment of
Returning to
Operation of the enhanced circulator system 26 shown in
A modified version of the enhanced circulator system 26 is depicted schematically in
Yet another modified version of the enhanced circulator system 26 is depicted in
The operating principle of this embodiment is as follows. A reset voltage is applied to the non-inverting inputs of the operational amplifiers 34-1 through 34-N. Provided the reset voltage is higher than a maximum detected output voltage level of an initial output voltage of each of the operational amplifiers 34-1 through 34-N, the output voltage of each of the operational amplifiers 34-1 through 34-N transitions to a maximum voltage level. In response, each of the BST drivers 36-1 through 36-N follows by transitioning to a maximum voltage, which in the exemplary case is 25 V. Therefore, tuner bias voltages VC1 through VCN are pinned to 25 V, and capacitors CD1 through CDN coupled between corresponding BST drivers 36-2 through 36-N and ground each charge to 25 V. The TX leakage is high in this reset state as the tuner circuitry 28 is not biased for TX leakage cancellation.
In this regard, next assume that the reset signal is disabled, leaving the first log detector 32-1 that is coupled to the RX port 16 near its maximum output voltage due to a relatively high TX leakage level. The output voltage of the second log detector 32-2 coupled to the TX port 14 drops to the value associated with the desired leakage level, which is less than that of the first log detector 32-1. This response forces operational amplifiers 34-1 through 34-N to transition to their minimum output level. Tuner bias voltage VC2 transitions from 25 V to near 0 V. Tuner bias voltages VC1 through VCN excluding VC2 also decrease, but more slowly, as capacitors CD1 through CDN discharge. The discharging of capacitors CD1 through CDN mimics a manual ramping of the tuner bias voltages VC1 through VCN, excluding VC2. When the tuner bias voltages VC1 through VCN enter the solution space for the tuner circuitry 28, the operational amplifiers 34-1 through 34-N lock their inverting input voltages near the output voltage of the second log detector 32-2. The addition of the capacitors CD1 through CDN may be avoided by using different RC products for the operational amplifiers 34-1 through 34-N. The enhanced circulator system 26 of
The exemplary embodiment of
Those skilled in the art will recognize improvements and modifications to the preferred embodiments of the present disclosure. All such improvements and modifications are considered within the scope of the concepts disclosed herein and the claims that follow.
This application claims the benefit of provisional patent application Ser. No. 62/729,652, filed Sep. 11, 2018, and of provisional patent application Ser. No. 62/730,202, filed Sep. 12, 2018, the disclosures of which are hereby incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.
This disclosure was made with government funds under contract number HR0011-17-C-0017 awarded by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency Signal Processing at RF (DARPA SPAR) program through Rockwell Collins, Inc., Cedar Rapids, Iowa. The U.S. Government may have rights in this disclosure.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4430619 | Epsom | Feb 1984 | A |
8130054 | Martin | Mar 2012 | B1 |
10200026 | Shapiro | Feb 2019 | B1 |
20080272959 | Meharry | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20160105272 | Griffiths | Apr 2016 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
Boaventura, Alirio, et. al., “Perfect Isolation: Dealing with Self-Jamming in Passive RFID Systems,” IEEE Microwave Magazine, vol. 17, Issue 11, Nov. 2016, pp. 20-39. |
Chen, Po-Wen, et. al., “A High Isolation Quasi-Circulator with Self-Adjusting Technique”, Asia-Pacific Microwave Conference, Nov. 2014, IEEE, pp. 268-270. |
Debaillie, Bjorn, et. al., “Analog/RF Solutions Enabling Compact Full-Duplex Radios”, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 32, Issue 9, Jun. 2014, 13 pages. |
Huusari, Timo, et. al., “Wideband Self-Adaptive RF Cancellation Circuit for Full-Duplex Radio: Operating Principle and Measurements”, Vehicular Technology Conference, May 2015, IEEE, 7 pages. |
Kolodziej, K.E., et. al. “Single Antenna In-Band Full-Duplex Isolation-Improvement Techniques”, International Symposium on Antennas and Propagation, Oct. 2016, IEEE, pp. 1661-1662. |
Pochiraju, T., et. al., “Reflection/transmission tuner analysis and applications”, IET Microwaves, Antennas & Propagation, vol. 4, Issue 9, 2010, IET, pp. 1387-1396. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200083583 A1 | Mar 2020 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62729652 | Sep 2018 | US | |
62730202 | Sep 2018 | US |