This invention generally relates to a container made of polymer materials, such as polyethylene terephthalate (PET) or other similar polyester materials, having at least one circumferential stiffening rib. Moreover, this invention generally relates to a polymer container filled with a liquid at an elevated temperature and quickly sealed with a closure before cooling. As the liquid subsequently cools, the container is subjected to vacuum related forces.
Packagers, to ensure adequate sterilization, often fill bottles and containers with liquids or products at an elevated temperature of approximately 180° F. to 205° F. (82° C. to 96° C.) and seal with a closure before cooling. Manufacturers generally refer to this as a “hot-fill” container or as a “hot-filling” process. As the sealed container cools, a slight vacuum, or negative pressure, forms inside causing the container to slightly change shape, particularly when made of polymer materials and generally having a somewhat flexible nature.
Typically, although not always, manufacturers produce these hot-fill containers in polyester materials, such as polyethylene terephthalate (PET), using a “stretch blow-molding” process, well known in the art, that substantially biaxially orients material molecular structure within the container. While PET materials are typical, other polymer materials, such as polypropylene, polyethylene, polycarbonate, and other polyesters, such as polyethylene naphthalate, are feasible using a variety of container production processes, also well known in the art, which may or may not establish the biaxial oriented material molecular structure.
Container and bottle designers attempting to control the change-in-shape from hot-fill often incorporate a plurality of generally recessed vacuum panels within the sidewalls around the container's body. Those skilled in the art are well aware of a variety of vacuum panel configurations. The vacuum panels tend to focus the change-in-shape allowing the container to retain a pleasing generally uniform appearance. Retaining the pleasing generally uniform appearance is an important consideration to the packager and its customers. If the container should collapse in an un-uniform manner, the container appearance becomes less pleasing and the customer becomes reluctant to purchase, believing the product damaged.
Packagers attempting to reduce cost, require containers to have less material or to be lighter in weight. Accordingly, containers lighter in weight are more vulnerable to unwanted changes-in-shape.
Container and bottle designers further attempting to control unwanted changes-in-shape have added reinforcing grooves or ribs (not illustrated) at or near the shaded circular spots shown on
Accordingly, the inventors have discovered a new and novel rib configuration which is more adequate for controlling unwanted changes-in-shape of the polymer container, in particular of the polyester polymer container.
A polymer container includes a neck finish portion suitable for receiving a closure, a shoulder portion adjacent the neck finish portion, a body portion adjacent the shoulder portion, the body portion having a plurality of vacuum panels formed therein and a land area between any adjacent pair of vacuum panels, and a bottom portion adjacent the body portion. The polymer container further includes a circumferential rib adjacent to at least one of the shoulder portion and the bottom portion. The circumferential rib defined in part by a plurality of varying width regions. The varying width regions transition from and oscillate between a smaller dimension area, to a larger dimension area, to the smaller dimension area. The larger dimension area of the varying width regions of the circumferential rib is adjacent the land area. The circumferential rib has a depth at least equal to 25 percent of a width of the smaller dimension area.
In a preferred configuration, each region of the plurality of varying width regions of the circumferential rib is continuous, joining and transitioning into each adjacent region of the plurality of varying width regions. Also in the preferred configuration, each region of the plurality of varying width regions of the circumferential rib is substantially symmetrical on either side of an imaginary, horizontal plane located along a centerline extending through the circumferential rib.
In an alternative configuration, each region of the plurality of varying width regions of the circumferential rib is disconnected and separated from each adjacent region of the plurality of varying width regions. While the above-described symmetrical configuration is preferred, another alternative is for each region of the plurality of varying width regions of the circumferential rib to be asymmetrical to an imaginary, horizontal plane located along a centerline extending through the circumferential rib. In another alternative, the asymmetrical circumferential rib includes an edge which is substantially parallel to an imaginary, horizontal plane located along a centerline extending through the circumferential rib and an opposite edge which is in part non-parallel to the imaginary plane. In the case of the asymmetrical circumferential rib configuration, the location of the opposite edge being in part non-parallel to the imaginary plane is preferred to be adjacent to the land area between any two adjacent vacuum panels.
From the following description, the appended claims, and the accompanying drawings, additional benefits and advantages of the present invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art to which this invention relates.
The well-known stretch-molding heat-setting process for making the hot-fillable container 10 generally involves first manufacture of a preform (not illustrated) of a polyester material, such as polyethylene terephthalate, having a shape well known to those skilled in the art similar to a test-tube with a generally cylindrical cross-section with a length approximately 50 percent that of the container height. A machine (not illustrated) places the preform heated to a temperature between approximately 190° F. to 250° F. (88° C. to 121° C.) into a mold cavity (not illustrated) having a shape similar to the container 10 and at a temperature between approximately 250° F. to 350° F. (121° C. to 176° C.). A stretch rod apparatus (not illustrated) stretches or extends the heated preform within the mold cavity to a length approximately that of the container thereby molecularly orienting the polyester material in an axial direction generally corresponding with centerline 20. While the stretch rod is extending the preform, air having a pressure between 300 PSI to 600 PSI (2.068 MPa to 4.137 MPa) assists extending the preform in the axial direction while expanding the preform in a circumferential or hoop direction thereby substantially conforming the polyester material to the shape of the mold cavity and further molecularly orienting the polyester material in a direction generally perpendicular to the axial direction thus establishing the biaxial molecular orientation of the polyester material in most of the container. The pressurized air holds the mostly biaxially oriented polyester material against the mold cavity for a period of approximately 2 to 5 seconds before removal of the container from the mold cavity.
The body portion of container 10 features an upper label panel edge or indent 26, a lower label panel edge or indent 28 and a plurality of vacuum panels 22. Typically, container designers use between four to eight vacuum panels with six vacuum panels being the most common. The vacuum panels 22 illustrated in
Container 10 is for hot-fill applications where bottlers fill the container 10 with a liquid or product at an elevated temperature between approximately 180° F. to 205° F. (82° C. to 96° C.) and seal with a closure before cooling (not illustrated). As the sealed container cools, a slight vacuum, or negative pressure, forms inside causing the container to slightly change shape (not illustrated), particularly, when made of lightweight polymer materials and thus generally having a somewhat flexible nature. Container and bottle designers attempting to control the change-in-shape from hot-fill incorporate vacuum panels 22 around the container's body portion 16 to focus the change-in-shape allowing the container 10 to retain a pleasing generally uniform appearance. Packagers and bottlers attempting to reduce cost, require containers to have less material or be lighter in weight. Accordingly, containers lighter in weight are more vulnerable to unwanted changes-in-shape or collapse. The area generally illustrated in
Otherwise similar to container 10 illustrated in
Those skilled in the art will be able to easily select an appropriate value for small inside radius dimension SIR permitting the small inside radius to be tangent with selected upper small outside radius dimension USOR and lower small outside radius dimension LSOR, and to smoothly accommodate selected small width dimension SW and small depth dimension SD. While the upper small outside radius dimension USOR and the lower small outside radius dimension LSOR preferably have the same value, except for previously stated embodiments, it is not a requirement that the upper small outside radius dimension USOR and the lower small outside radius dimension LSOR be the same value. By way of example, for container 10′ having a capacity of approximately one liter, small width dimension SW typically is approximately 0.150 inches (3.81 mm). Accordingly, small depth dimension SD is typically in a range from approximately 0.038 inches (0.97 mm) to approximately 0.075 inches (1.91 mm). Upper small outside radius dimension USOR and lower small outside radius dimension LSOR are preferably in a range from approximately 0.015 inches (0.38 mm) to approximately 0.045 inches (1.14 mm).
Those skilled in the art will be able to easily select appropriate values for upper large outside radius dimension ULOR, lower large outside radius dimension LLOR, and large inside radius dimension LIR to smoothly accommodate selected large width dimension LW and large depth dimension LD. While the upper large outside radius dimension ULOR and the lower large outside radius dimension LLOR preferably have the same value, except for previously stated embodiments, it is not a requirement that the upper large outside radius dimension ULOR and the lower large outside radius dimension LLOR be the same value. By way of example, for container 10′ having a capacity of approximately one liter and the small width dimension SW of 0.150 inches (3.81 mm), large width dimension LW is typically in a range from approximately 0.225 inches (5.72 mm) to approximately 0.300 inches (7.62 mm). Large depth dimension LD is as great as 0.150 inches (3.81 mm), but not less than the value of small depth dimension SD. Preferably upper large outside radius dimension ULOR and lower large outside radius dimension LLOR are as great as 0.090 inches (2.29 mm), but more preferably not less than the value of respective upper small outside radius dimension USOR and lower small outside radius dimension LSOR.
SP≧LW′−(UOR+LOR+UIR+LIR).
As appropriate, upper small outside radius dimension USOR, lower small outside radius dimension LSOR, upper large outside radius dimension ULOR, lower large outside radius dimension LLOR, upper outside radius dimension UOR and lower outside radius dimension LOR generally correspond to a first edge 33 or a second edge 35 of circumferential rib 34. The first edge 33 is adjacent to vacuum panels 22. The second edge 35 as appropriate is adjacent to either shoulder portion 14 or bottom portion 18. Between the first edge 33 and the second edge 35 is the imaginary, horizontal plane 40.
The foregoing describes certain preferred embodiments and alternatives, and one must understand that other variations are feasible that do not depart from the spirit and scope of the inventions as defined by the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4497855 | Agrawal et al. | Feb 1985 | A |
4805788 | Akiho | Feb 1989 | A |
5261543 | Ugarelli | Nov 1993 | A |
5337909 | Vailliencourt | Aug 1994 | A |
5341946 | Vailliencourt et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
D352238 | Vailliencourt et al. | Nov 1994 | S |
D366416 | Semersky | Jan 1996 | S |
D366831 | Semersky et al. | Feb 1996 | S |
5632397 | Fandeux et al. | May 1997 | A |
5704503 | Krishnakumar et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5704504 | Bueno | Jan 1998 | A |
6016932 | Gaydosh et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6036037 | Scheffer et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6062409 | Eberle | May 2000 | A |
6223920 | Lane et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6230912 | Rashid | May 2001 | B1 |
6296131 | Rashid | Oct 2001 | B2 |
6347717 | Eberle | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6497333 | Ellis et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
D491808 | Lane et al. | Jun 2004 | S |
D491812 | Eberle et al. | Jun 2004 | S |
6932230 | Pedmo et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2004026165 | Jan 2004 | JP |
WO9908945 | Feb 1999 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060186083 A1 | Aug 2006 | US |