Patent Grant
10093939
The early development of viral vectors was aimed at the inexpensive production of high levels of specialty proteins that could be scaled up in the field. The first attempt at a plant viral vector utilized Cauliflower mosaic virus, a dsDNA virus (Brisson et al., 1984; Gronenborn et al., 1981). However, this vector was too unstable to be useful (Fütterer et al., 1990). The development of reverse genetics systems amenable for manipulation of RNA viruses made many more viruses candidates for vector development (Ahlquist et al., 1984).
Virus vectors are key ingredients in basic research and have great potential for commercial applications. Lack of stability of foreign inserts has been a major drawback for potential applications of virus vectors for commercial protein expression in field applications.
The present disclosure is based on multiple studies testing the vector limits of using CTV to express foreign genes ranging from 806 to 3480 nucleotides in size. In one embodiment, gene cassettes were introduced into the CTV genome as replacement of the p13 gene. In other embodiments, a gene was inserted at different locations (e.g., p13-p20, p20-p23 and p23-3′NTR (non-translated region)). In another embodiment, a fusion to p23 and protease processing were tested. In alternative embodiments, genes were inserted behind IRES sequences to create bi-cistronic messages.
Twenty seven expression vectors have been created and tested in Nicotinia benthamiana protoplasts and plants. Remarkably, most of the newly developed vector constructs disclosed herein replicated, spread systemically in plants, and produced their foreign gene(s). The highest expressing vectors tested include the “add a gene” constructs having an insertion between the p13 and p20 genes or between the p23 gene and the 3′NTR. Similarly, the vectors with the inserted gene replacing the p13 gene effectively expressed different reporter genes. However, optimal expression of the reporter gene depended both on the size and location of the insertion. Optimal expression of smaller genes are from positions nearer the 3′ terminus, whereas larger genes are optimally expressed from more internal positions.
Efficient expression of two genes simultaneously from the same vector has been accomplished in both N. benthamiana and citrus. The novel CTV constructs disclosed herein have genomes with unique elasticity capable of accommodating and expressing foreign gene/s by different strategies.
Engineering an effective vector requires a balance between different factors. The vector needs to be designed such that replication and systemic movement in the plant are reduced minimally while the level of expression of the foreign protein is maximal (Shivprasad et al., 1999). The final factor is the stability of the vector. In general, the vector's usefulness is directly correlated with its stability. Stability is a product of reduced recombination and increased competitiveness of the vector with the resulting recombinants that have lost part or all of the inserted sequences.
The early development of viral vectors was aimed at the inexpensive production of high levels of specialty proteins that could be scaled up in the field. The first attempt at a plant viral vector utilized Cauliflower mosaic virus, a dsDNA virus (Brisson et al., 1984; Gronenborn et al., 1981). However, this vector was too unstable to be useful (Fütterer et al., 1990). The development of reverse genetics systems amenable for manipulation of RNA viruses made many more viruses candidates for vector development (Ahlquist et al., 1984). There was considerable controversy concerning the value of RNA viruses for vectors (Siegel, 1983, 1985; Van Vluten-Dotting, 1983 Van Vluten-Dotting et al., 1985). It was argued that the lack of proof-reading of the RNA virus replicases would result in too rapid sequence drift to maintain foreign sequences during replication. However, subsequent development and use of RNA virus-based vectors demonstrated that this concern was overstated.
Ongoing efforts have been underway to create virus-based vectors for citrus trees based on Citrus tristeza virus (CTV). CTV has the largest reported RNA of a plant virus of approximately 20 kb (Karasev et al., 1995; Pappu et al., 1994). It has two conserved gene blocks associated with replication and virion formation (Karasev, 2000). The replication gene block occupies the 5′ half of the genome. Its proteins are expressed from the genomic RNA via a poly protein strategy with a +1 ribosomal frame shift to occasionally express the RNA dependent RNA polymerase (Karasev et al., 1995). The filamentous virions of CTV are encapsidated by two coat proteins, with the major coat protein (CP) encapsidating about 97% of the virion and the 5′ ˜700 nts encapsidated by the minor coat protein (CPm) (Satyanarayana et al., 2004). Virion formation is a complex process requiring two proteins (Hsp70h and p61) in addition to the coat proteins (Satyanarayana et al., 2000, 2004; Tatineni et al., 2010). These four genes as well as the 6 remaining genes are differentially expressed via a nested set of 3′ co-terminal sub genomic (sg) RNAs (Hilf et al., 1995). Upstream of each ORF there is a controller element (CE) that determines the transcription level (Gowda et al., 2001). Levels of transcription are also associated with the +1 transcription start site (Ayllón et al., 2003), the presence of a non-translated region upstream of the ORF (Gowda et al., 2001), and the closeness of the ORF to the 3′ terminus (Satyanarayana et al., 1999).
The first generations of CTV vector examined three different strategies that were fusion of the CP gene, insertion of an extra gene, and replacement of the p13 ORF (Folimonov et al., 2007). Replacement of the p13 ORF and fusion to the coat protein ORF did not result in effective vectors, but the addition of an extra gene resulted in viable vectors that produce relative large amounts of foreign gene and were stable in citrus trees for years. However, the first efforts in designing vectors based on CTV examined only a few of the many possibilities for expressing foreign genes in this large virus. In this work, the inventors attempted to examine the limitations of CTV to be manipulated into a vector. The inventors examined whether the virus allowed insertions in different positions within the genome and which resulted in maximal expression with different sizes of inserts. The inventors also examined whether different fusion strategies with different viral genes are viable and whether multiple foreign genes can be expressed. The CTV constructs disclosed herein are amazingly tolerant to manipulation at several positions within the genome giving a multitude of different vector strategies that are viable.
Once citrus is infected with a CTV vector containing a foreign gene, it is easy to move the vector to other citrus trees by grafting. However, a limitation of the CTV vector system is the difficulty of initially getting citrus infected with new vector constructs. Directly inoculating citrus from the cDNA clones, either by agro-inoculation, particle bombardment, or mechanical inoculation with RNA transcripts is extremely difficult and unpredictable (Gowda et al., 2005; Satyanarayana et al., 2001). An alternative has been to inoculate with virions purified from Nicotiana benthamiana protoplasts (Folimonov et al., 2007; Robertson et al., 2005; Satyanarayana et al., 2001; Tatineni et al., 2008). However, infection of only approximately 0.01-0.1% of protoplasts with in vitro transcribed RNA has been achieved (Satyanarayana et al., 2001). Yet, since virions are much more infectious to the protoplasts than RNA (Navas-Castillo et al., 1997), the inventors were able to amplify the infection by sequential passage in protoplasts (Folimonov et al., 2007; Robertson et al., 2005; Satyanarayana et al., 2001; Tatineni et al., 2008). Although workable, this is an extremely difficult system. The inventors are now able to agro-inoculate N. benthaminana plants that result in systemic infection. This result allows analysis of the vector constructs more quickly in these plants and provides copious amounts of recombinant virus for inoculation of citrus. Thus, the inventors report the activity of the different vector constructs in N. benthamina and Citrus.
According to one embodiment, the invention pertains to a CTV viral vector engineered to comprise a gene cassette comprising a polynucleotide encoding a heterologous polypeptide. The gene cassette is located at a targeted position on the CTV genome. In a more specific embodiment, the CTV viral vector is engineered such that the gene cassette is positioned at CTV genome regions p13-p20, p20-p23 or p23-3′NTR. In other embodiments, the CTV viral vector is engineered to include multiple genes at one or multiple positions. It is shown herein that CTV viral vectors can successfully be engineered to include up to 3 or at least 4 genes that are expressible by the vector, while maintaining the proper function and infectivity of the vector.
In related embodiments, the invention pertains to a plant that includes at least one cell transfected with the CTV viral vector engineered to comprise a gene cassette comprising a polynucleotide encoding a heterologous polypeptide, the CTV viral vector engineered such that one or more gene cassettes are positioned at CTV genome regions p13-p20, p20-p23 or p23-3′NTR. Other related embodiments pertain to methods of expressing at least one heterologous polypeptide in a plant by infecting the plant with the specified vector.
In a further embodiment, the invention is directed to a CTV viral vector engineered to comprise at least one gene cassette that includes a polynucleotide encoding a heterologous polypeptide, wherein the CTV viral vector engineered such that the gene cassette is inserted in place of the CTV p13 gene. In related embodiments, the invention pertains to a plant that includes at least one cell transfected with the CTV viral vector or to methods of expressing the heterologous polypeptide in a plant by infecting the plant with the specified vector.
In another embodiment, the invention relates to a CTV viral vector engineered to comprise at least one gene cassette comprising a polynucleotide encoding heterologous polypeptide and IRES sequence conjugated thereto. In related embodiments, the invention pertains to a plant that includes at least one cell transfected with the CTV viral vector or to methods of expressing the heterologous polypeptide in a plant by infecting the plant with the specified vector.
In further embodiments, the invention relates to a CTV viral vector engineered to comprise a gene cassette comprising a polynucleotide sequence with continuous amino acid codons extending from the p23 ORF encoding a first heterologous polypeptide (protease) with cleavage sites on each side plus a second heterologous polypeptide. In related embodiments, the invention pertains to a plant that includes at least one cell transfected with the CTV viral vector or to methods of expressing the heterologous polypeptide in a plant by infecting the plant with the specified vector.
In further embodiments, the polynucleotide further comprises a sequence encoding a first control element upstream of said first heterologous polypeptide, a second sequence encoding a protease with cleavage sites engineered on each side, and a sequence encoding a second heterologous polypeptide.
According to another embodiment, the invention is directed to CTV viral vector engineered to comprise a first gene cassette comprising a polynucleotide sequence encoding a first heterologous polypeptide and a first controller element upstream of said first heterologous polypeptide encoding sequence; and a second gene cassette comprising a polynucleotide sequence encoding a second heterologous polypeptide and a second control element upstream of said second heterologous polypeptide encoding sequence. Optionally, the CTV viral vector further comprises a third gene cassette comprising a polynucleotide sequence encoding a third heterologous polypeptide and a third controller element upstream of said third heterologous polypeptide encoding sequence; and a fourth gene cassette comprising a polynucleotide sequence encoding a fourth heterologous polypeptide and a fourth controller element upstream of said fourth heterologous polypeptide encoding sequence. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that additional gene cassettes can be added to the vector so long as function and infectivity of the vector is maintained. In related embodiments, the invention pertains to a plant that includes at least one cell transfected with the CTV viral vector or to methods of expressing the heterologous polypeptide in a plant by infecting the plant with the specified vector.
Examples of controller elements (CE) useful in accordance with the teachings herein include but are not limited to controller elements homologous to CTV or heterologous control elements. Heterologous controller elements include, but are not limited to, coat protein controller elements (CP-CEs) of three closteroviruses: Beet yellows virus (BYV) (94 nts from 13547-13640 Genbank accession # AF190581) (Peremyslov et al., 1999), Beet yellow stunt virus (BYSV) (101 nts from 8516-8616 Genbank accession # U51931) (Karasev et al., 1996) and Grape vine leaf roll associated virus-2 (GLRaV-2) (198 nts from 9454-9651 Genbank accession # DQ286725). It will be evident to those skilled in the art, in view of the teachings herein, that other controller elements may be implemented, and in particular control elements having strong promoter like activity.
These and other embodiments are further described below and encompassed within the appended claims.
pCTV9RΔp33 and pCTVΔCla 333R (Gowda et al., 2001; Satyanarayana et al., 1999, 2000, 2003; Tatineni et al., 2008) were used as base plasmids for developing all expression vectors that were used in the protoplast reverse genetics system. The numbering of the nucleotides (nts) is based on the full length T36 clone (Genbank Accession # AY170468) (Satyanarayana et al., 1999, 2003). CTVp333R-23-ITEV-GFP and CTVp333R-23-I3×ARC-GFP (
The expression vectors created in pCTV9RΔp33 were introduced into the CTV genome by digesting the plasmid with PstI (nts 17208-17213) and NotI or StuI (introduced behind 19,293 the final CTV nucleotide). Overlap extension PCR (Horton et al., 1989) was used to introduce the appropriate genes at the different locations. Replacement of the p13 gene was done by deletion of nts 17293-17581 in the p13 ORF and (CE) by overlap extension PCR (
The binary plasmid pCAMBIACTV9R (Gowda et al., 2005) was modified to eliminate the p33 gene by deleting nts 10858-11660 (Satyanarayana et al., 2000; Tatineni et al., 2008) and introducing a SwaI site behind the ribozyme engineered based on subterranean clover mottle virusoid (Turpen et al., 1993). PCR products amplified from the expression vectors in the pCTV9RΔp33 back-bone were introduced into the modified binary plasmid pCAMBIACTV9RΔp33 digested with PstI (Forward primer C-749) and SwaI (Reverse primer C-1894). When introducing the bimolecular fluorescence complementation (BiFC) genes into constructs CTV33-23-BYbJunN-GbFosC-59 (
TTC GTC CTT TAG
GGA CTC GTC AGT
GTA CTG ATATAA
GTA CAG ACT GGA
GAC ACT ATA G
TG
PCR was performed using diluted plasmids (1:50) as templates using Vent DNA polymerase (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, Ma.) according to the manufacturer recommendations.
Agro-inoculation of Nicotiana benthamiana was performed according to the procedure developed by Gowda et al., (2005) with minor modifications. Agrobacterium tumefaciens EHA 105 was transformed with the binary plasmid containing CTV, variants (expression vectors) and silencing suppressors (p19 of Tomato bushy stunt virus (Gowda et al., 2005); p24 of GLRaV-2 (Chiba et al., 2007), P1/HC-Pro of Turnip mosaic virus (Kasschau et al., 2003) and p22 of Tomato chlorosis virus (Cañizares et al., 2008) by heat shock method (37° C. for 5 minutes) and subsequently were grown at 28° C. for 48 hours (hrs) on luria burtani (LB) (Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, Mo.) plates supplemented with antibiotics (kanamycin (50 microgram (μg)/milliliter (ml)) and Rifampicilin ((50 μg/ml)). The colonies (two individual colonies per construct) were grown overnight as seed cultures in LB medium supplemented with antibiotics. On the next day 0.5 ml of the seed culture was used to inoculate 35 ml of LB medium supplemented with antibiotics for overnight growth. The bacterial culture was centrifuged at 6,000 rotation per minute (rpm) and resuspended in 10 milli molar (mM) MgCL2 and 10 mM MES. The pellet was washed with 10 mM MgCL2 and 10 mM MES and suspended in induction medium; 10 mM MgCL2 and 10 mM MES containing acetosyringone at a final concentration of 150 μM. The suspension was incubated in the induction medium for at least 5 hrs before injection into the stem or infiltration into the abaxial (lower) surface of N. benthamiana leaves.
N. benthmaiana plants maintained in a growth-room (21° C. with 16 hrs of light in a 24 hr period) were used for agro-injection/agro-infiltration four weeks after transplanting.
Recombinant virions of CTV for infection of citrus plants were obtained from infiltrated and/or systemic leaves of N. benthamiana. The virions were partially purified and enriched by concentration over a sucrose cushion in a TL 100 or SW41 rotor (Robertson et al., 2005). Virions of constructs expressing two foreign proteins were concentrated two times over a step gradient followed by a cushion gradient in SW28 and SW41 rotors, respectively (Garnsey and Henderson, 1982). Inoculation of citrus plants was carried out by bark flap inoculation into 1-1.5 year old Citrus macrophylla seedlings (Robertson et al., 2005) which were grown in a greenhouse with temperatures ranging between approximately 25-32° C.
N. benthamiana leaf mesopyhll protoplasts were prepared according to the procedure previously developed by Nava-Castillo et al., (1997). Surface sterilized leaves from three week old N. benthamiana plants were gently slashed on the lower side with a sterile blade and incubated overnight in the dark (16-20 hrs) in 0.7M MMC (0.7M mannitol, 5 mM MES, 10 mM CaCl2) supplemented with the 1% cellulose (Yakult Honsh, Tokyo, Japan) and 0.5% macerase pectinase enzymes (Calbiochem, La Jolla, Calif.).
Capped in vitro RNA transcripts from NotI or StuI linearized plasmid DNA were generated (Satyanarayana et al., 1999) using Sp6 RNA polymerase (Epicentre Technologies, WI) and were transfected into the protoplasts using PEG (poly ethylene glycol) as described by Satyanarayana et al., (1999). Four days after transfection, protoplasts were used for preparation of total RNA for northern blot hybridization analysis and isolation of virions. Protoplasts were pelleted in equal amounts in two 1.5 ml eppendorf tubes. The first tube was flash frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80° C. for isolation of virions to subsequently inoculate a new batch of protoplasts to amplify virions (Satyanarayana et al., 2000). The second tube was used for RNA isolation by the buffard buffer disruption of protoplasts followed by phenol:chloroform:isoamyl alcohol (25:24:1) extraction and ethanol precipitation as previously described by Navas-Castillo et al., (1997) and Robertson et al., (2005). Total RNA was resuspended in 20 μl DNAse/RNAase free water and used in Northern blot hybridization analysis as previously described by Lewandowski and Dawson (1998). In brief, isolated RNA was heat denatured in denaturing buffer (8.6% formaldehyde, 67% formamide in 1×MOPS (5 mM sodium acetate, 1 mM EDTA, 0.02M MOPS pH=7.0) separated in a 0.9% agarose gel in 1×MOPS containing 1.9% formaldehyde, and transferred onto a nylon membrane (Boehringer Mannheim, Germany) by electroblotting. Pre-hybridization (at least 1 hr) and hybridization (overnight) were carried out in a hybridization oven (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, Mo.) at 68° C. A 900 nts digoxigenin labeled RNA probe corresponding to the 3′ end of the CTV genome (plus strand specific CTV RNA probe) (Satyanarayana et al., 1999) was used for hybridization except when the insertion of the foreign genetic material was behind p23 in which case a digoxigenin labeled RNA probe was produced from PCR amplified DNA (reverse primer contain 3′NTR of CTV and SP6 phage promoter (C-1982) according to the manufacturer recommendation (Boehringer Mannheim, Germany) that is complimentary to the sequence inserted behind p23 in addition to the 3′NTR sequence of CTV.
After powdering the plant tissue in liquid nitrogen via grinding in a mortar and pestle, laemmli buffer (50 mM Tris-C1, pH 6.8, 2.5% 2-mercaptoethanol, 2% SDS, 0.1% bromophenol blue, 10% glycerol) was added (100 μl per 100 mg tissue). The sample was transferred to a 1.5 ml centrifuge tube and boiled in a water bath for 3 minutes followed by centrifugation at maximum speed for 2 minutes. The supernatant was transferred to a new tube and stored at −20° C. until further use. The electrophoresis was carried out in a 12% SDS-Polyacrylamide gel (Bio-Rad, Hercules, Calif.) followed by two hours of semi-dry blotting to transfer the protein onto a nitrocellulose membrane (Bio-Rad, Hercules, Calif.). The membrane was blocked for 1 hr at room temperature followed by incubation with the primary antibody of either CP (1:5000), GFP (1:100) (Clontech Laboratories, Palo Alto, Calif.) or GUS (1:1000) (Molecular probes, Eugene, Or.) for an hour followed incubation for 1 hr in horseradish peroxidase conjugated donkey anti-rabbit secondary antibody (1:10,000) (Amersham, Buckinghamshire, United Kingdom). Finally, the chemiluminescent system for western blot (Amersham, Buckinghamshire, United Kingdom) development on an X-ray film (Kodak, Rochester, N.Y.) was used according to the manufacturer recommendations.
Plant pictures under UV or white light were taken with a Canon Camera (Canon EOS Digital Rebel XTi 400D, Lake Success, New York). Close up fluorescent pictures of plant parts or protoplast were taken using a fluorescent dissecting microscope (Zeiss Stemi SV 11 UV-fluorescence dissecting microscope, Carl Zeiss Jena, GmbH., Jena, Germany). High resolution protoplast pictures were taken using a confocal scanning microscope (Leica TCS SL, Leica Microsystems, Inc., Exton, Pa.).
Double antibody sandwiched ELISA was used according to the procedure developed by Garnsey and Cambra (1991). A rabbit polyclonal antibody (1 μg/ml) was used for coating the ELISA plate. The plant tissue sample was diluted at a 1:20 in PBS-T (phosphate buffer saline-1% Tween 20) extraction buffer. The detection antibody used was Mab ECTV 172 (1:100K dilution).
Citrus bark pieces or systemic leaves from Agro-inoculated N. benthamiana plants that were surface sterilized in alcohol (70% ethanol) followed by Sodium hypo chloride (10% solution) and washing three times in sterile distilled water before staining for GUS. The samples were incubated overnight in an EDTA-phosphate buffer (0.1M Na2HPO4, 1 mM Na2EDTA) containing 1 mg/ml X-gluc (cyclohexylammounium salt: Gold Biotechnology, St Louis, Mo.). Fixing of the tissue was done in 95% ethanol:glacial acetic acid solution (3:1.
CTV-based expression vectors were examined in three systems, N. benthamiana mesophyll protoplasts as well as whole plants of N. benthaminia and Citrus macropylla. The full-length cDNA clone of CTV (pCTV9R) and a mutant with most of the p33 gene deleted (pCTV9RΔp33), which has a PstI restriction site removed making cloning easier and still retaining the ability to infect most citrus varieties (Tatineni et al., 2008), was used for building constructs to infect whole plants. Relatively quick assays were done in N. benthamiana protoplasts, which require constructs to be built in the SP6 transcription plasmid (Satyanarayana et al., 1999). A mini-replicon pCTVΔCla 333R (Gowda et al., 2001), with most of the 3′ genes removed, was convenient to use in protoplasts. The ultimate goal to obtain citrus trees infected with the different CTV expression vectors was much more difficult and time consuming. So far, agro-inoculate citrus trees has proven difficult. Thus, to avoid this difficulty virions are amplified and concentrated for inoculation of citrus trees by stem-slashing or bark-flap inoculation (Robertson et al., 2005; Satyanarayana et al., 2001). N. benthamiana protoplasts can be inoculated with in vitro produced transcripts of recombinant CTV constructs and the virus amplified by successively passaging virions in crude sap through a series of protoplasts (Folimonov et al., 2007; Satyanarayana et al., 2001; Tatineni et al., 2008). Also, recombinant CTV can be amplified in N. benthamiana plants after agro-inoculation (Gowda et al., 2005). The virus can infect mesophyll cells of agro-inoculated areas of leaves, but as the virus moves systemically into upper non-inoculated leaves, it is limited to vascular tissues and usually induces vein clearing and later vein necrosis. All of the vector constructs were examined during systemic infection of N. benthamiana plants. Since CTV virions do not resuspend after centrifugation to a pellet, virions have to be concentrated by centrifugation through a sucrose step gradient (Garnsey et al., 1977; Robertson et al., 2005). After inoculation, the tops of citrus plants were removed, and viral systemic infections were monitored in new growth after 2-3 months. Once trees were infected, inoculum (buds, leaf pieces, or shoots) from the first infected plants was then used to propagate new plants for experimentation. The whole process takes approximately one year. For this reason, the inventors chose to examine only the most promising vector constructs in citrus trees. Some of the later developed constructs are not yet in citrus.
Insertions at the p13 Gene Site
The effective CTV vector developed previously (Folimonov et al., 2007) has the additional gene inserted between the two coat protein genes, positioning the foreign gene as the sixth gene from the 3′ terminus. Yet, the most highly expressed genes of CTV tend to be closer to the 3′ terminus. Thus, it appeared that positioning an inserted gene closer to the 3′ terminus could result in higher levels of expression. P13, the third gene from the 3′ terminus, is a relatively highly expressed gene that is not necessary for the infection of most of the CTV host range (Tatineni et al., 2008; Tatineni et al., in preparation). Yet, replacement of the p13 ORF with the GFP ORF was not successful in previous attempts (Folimonov et al., 2007). There were possible reasons for the failure. The previous construct was designed with the assumption that translation initiated at the first start codon, but the p13 ORF has a second in-frame AUG. Translation might normally start at the second AUG. However, fusion of the GFP ORF behind the second in frame AUG also did not express the reporter gene (Gowda et al., unpublished result). A second possibility is that the p13 controller element (CE) might extend into the p13 ORF or that ribosome recruitment is directed from within the ORF. Here, the inventors deleted the p13 CE and ORF and inserted a new ORF behind a heterologous CE in the p13 position. The GFP ORF controlled by the CP-CE from BYSV (101 nts from 8516-8616 accession # U51931), GLRaV-2 (198 nts from 9454-9651 accession # DQ286725) or BYV were engineered into pCTV9RΔp33 as a replacement for nts 17293-17581 (CTV33-Δ13-BY-GFP-57, CTV33-Δ13-G-GFP-65, CTV33-Δ13-B-GFP-66 respectively) (
CTV33-Δ13-G-GFP-65 and CTV33-Δ13-B-GFP-66 were amplified and used to inoculate Citrus macrophylla plants. The initially infected plants exhibited bright fluorescence in vascular tissue (
The GFP ORF (720 nts) was replaced with the GUS ORF (1812 nts) in the same position to examine the expression of a larger foreign gene. The BYSV CP-CE was selected to drive the GUS ORF in expression vector CTV33-Δ13-BY-GUS-61 (
Virions isolated from infiltrated leaves of N. benthamiana plants of CTV33-Δ13-BY-GUS-61 infected Citrus macrophylla plants as confirmed by ELISA (Data not presented) and the bioactivity of the GUS protein (
Technically, the above constructs replaced a gene (p13) rather than added an extra gene. To examine a vector with an extra gene between p13 and p20, the CP-CE of BYSV controlling the GFP ORF was inserted between nts 17685-17686 to yield CTV33-13-BY-GFP-69 (
Construct CTV33-13-BY-GFP-69 infected C. macrophylla plants as indicated by strong fluorescence throughout the vascular tissue (
Insertion Between p20 and p23
To examine expression of a foreign gene closer to the 3′ NTR of CTV, an extra gene was inserted between the p20 and p23 genes (nts 18312-18313). The BYV or BYSV CP-CE was used to drive the GFP mRNA in two vectors based on T36 CTV9RΔp33 (CTV33-20-B-GFP-49 and CTV33-20-BY-GFP-58) (
Insertion Between p23 and 3′NTR
The next position to be examined was to make the inserted gene the 3′-most gene. Since CTV gene expression tends to be highest for genes positions nearer the 3′ terminus, this position could be expected to result in the highest level of expression of a foreign gene (Navas-Castillo et al., 1997; Hilf et al., 1995). Although the 3′ NTR has been analyzed (Satyanarayana et al., 2002a), it was not known what effect an extra gene in this area would have on the efficiency of replication. The insertion of an extra gene between the CP gene and the 3′NTR in Tobacco mosaic virus (TMV) and Alfalfa mosaic virus (AMV) failed to produce viable vectors (Dawson et al., 1989; Sánchez-Navarro et al., 2001). The CP-CE of BYSV, GLRaV-2 or BYV in front of the GFP ORF was inserted between nucleotides 19020 and 19021 creating vectors CTV33-23-BY-GFP-37, CTV33-23-G-GFP-40 and CTV33-23-B-GFP-42, respectively (
Construct CTV33-23-BY-GFP-37 was amplified by passage through 12 protoplast sets before citrus inoculation. C macrophylla plants that were bark-flap inoculated with the concentrated virions became infected. The infection of citrus was confirmed by fluorescence of GFP (
To examine the ability of the vector to express a larger gene at this position, the GUS ORF behind the BYSV CP-CE was inserted 3′ of the p23 gene resulting in construct CTV33-23-BY-GUS-60 (
Concentrated virions from Construct CTV33-23-GUS-60 were used to inoculate C. macropyhlla plants, which became infected as confirmed by ELISA (Data not presented) and activity of the GUS gene (
Internal Ribosome Entry Site Strategy (IRES)
The Tobacco Etch Virus (TEV) IRES
The 5′NTR of TEV mediates cap independent translation of the viral mRNA. Studies on the 5′NTR of TEV demonstrate its ability to initiate translation at an internal ORF in a bi-cistronic mRNA (Gallie, 2001; Niepel and Gallie, 1999). The 5′NTR of TEV (nts 2-144 Genbank accession # DQ986288) was inserted into a CTV mini-replicon behind the p23 ORF (between nts 19020-19021) followed by the GFP ORF (CTVp333R-23-ITEV-GFP) (
Active ribosome complementary sequence (ARC) IRES
Insertion of an IRES consensus sequence obtained from analysis of host and viral mRNAs (the engineered 3×ARC-1 (86 nts) IRES (Akbergenov et al., 2004)) was next examined for activity in CTV. This IRES was fused behind the p23 ORF (nts 19020-19021) in both the CTV mini-replicon (CTVp333R-23-I3×ARC-GFP) and Δp33CTV9R (CTV33-23-I3×ARC-GFP-43) as described above (
Poly-Peptide Fusion
P23, the highest expressed gene of CTV, is a multifunctional protein that is essential for citrus infection. P23 is a silencing suppressor and controls plus to minus RNA ratio in infected cells via an RNA binding domain constituted of positive charged amino acid residues and Zn finger domain present between amino acid 50-86 (Lopez et al., 2000; Satyanarayana et al., 2002b; Lu et al., 2004). In order to create a gene fusion the HC-Pro or NIa protease motifs of TEV were selected to be fused at the C-terminus of p23 (between nts 19017 and 19018) (
Use of Single Controller Elements to Express Multiple Proteins
In order to exploit the polypeptide strategy to express multiple genes driven by the same controller element in a CTV based vector, a fusion polypeptide was created consisting of GFP/Protease (Pro)/GUS. Two different protease motifs were used in the different constructs, HC-Pro and NIa, with their proteolytic motifs and recognition sequences separating GFP ORF from the GUS ORF (
Replacement of p13 Gene
The two fusions of GFP/Pro/GUS described above were engineered into the p13 site of CTV in the agro-inoculation binary vector under the control of the BYSV CP-CE (CTV33-Δ13-BYGFP-HC-GUS-77 with HC-Pro protease motif and CTV33-Δ13-BYGFP-NIa-GUS-78 with NIa protease motif) (
Insertion Between p23 and 3′NTR
In an attempt to improve the expression level of GFP and GUS, the fusion polypeptide was moved closer to the 3′NTR. The fusion gene with either BYSV, GLRaV-2 or BYV CP-CE with the protease of HC-Pro was inserted between p23 and 3′NTR referred to as CTV33-23-BY-GFP-HC-GUS-51, CTV33-23-G-GFP-HC-GUS-53 and CTV33-23-BY-GFP-HC-GUS-55 whereas with the NIa protease constructs were named, CTV33-23-BY-GFP-NIa-GUS-52, CTV33-23-G-GFP-NIa-GUS-54 and CTV33-23-BY-GFP-NIa-GUS-56, respectively (
Bimolecular Fluorescence Complementation (BiFC) in CTV.
For examination of the insertion of two CP-CE controlling different ORFs, the BiFC system, which produces visible fluorescence only when the two proteins accumulate in the same cell, was used. This system was developed using the bJun fused to N-terminus of EYFP (A.A. 1-154) (referred to as bJunN) and bFos ORF fused to C-terminus of EYFP (A.A. 155-238) (referred to as bFosC) (Hu et al., 2002).
Both proteins are transported to the nucleus where they directly interact enabling the EYFP protein to regain its wild type folding pattern and results in emission of fluorescence upon activation by a blue light source (Excitation wave length is 525 nm and emission wavelength is 575 nm) (Hu et al., 2002). One or both components of BiFC were introduced into the CTV mini-replicon 3′ of the p23 ORF (between nts #19020 and 19021 Genbank Accession # AY170468) referred to as CTVp333R-23-BYbJunN, CTVp333R-23-GbFosC and CTVp333R-23-BYbJunN-GbFosC (
As a control for the BiFC experiments, the inventors also introduced the genes individually into Δp33CTV9R behind p23 creating vectors CTV33-23-BYbJunN-97 and CTV33-23-GbFosC-98 so that only one component would be produced (
Expression of Multiple Foreign Genes Simultaneously at the Same Location
P13 Replacement.
Both genes were introduced into a Δp33CTV9R (Satyanarayana et al., 1999, 2000, 2003; Tatineni et al., 2008) as a replacement of the p13 gene (replacement of the nucleotides deleted between 17292 and 17581), resulting in CTV33-Δ13-BYbJunN-GbFosC-76 (
Insertion Between p23 and 3′NTR.
The next step was to examine expression of the two genes when positioned closer to the 3′ terminus. The two gene components of the BiFC system were introduced into CTVΔp33 behind p23 (between nts #19020 and 19021), CTV33-23-BYbJunN-GbFosC-59 (
To express multiple foreign genes from two different positions, the inventors elected to replace the p13 gene and insert a second gene behind p23. CTV33-Δ13-BYbJunN-23-GbFosC-67 (
In order to further study simultaneous multiple gene expression from the different locations as above, CTV33-Δ13-BYGUS-23-GGFP-71 was engineered such that the GUS ORF under the control of the BYSV CP-CE replaced the p13 gene(nts 17292-17582) and the GFP ORF under the control of the GLRaV-2 CP-CE was inserted between the p23 and 3′NTR (nts 19020 and 19021) (
It is difficult to directly compare foreign gene expression from the different vectors in citrus due to the differences in the times of infection, the ages of the tissue and the effects of the inserted foreign gene cassette on the replication of the virus. Yet, protein presence in citrus is the best measure of expression level. Thus, western blot analysis was used to compare the relative level of expression of the different GFP and GUS constructs in citrus to that of CP protein, a house keeping gene to determine the replication levels. Western blots using the GFP antibodies and the CP antibody revealed a trend which confirms the relative higher expression levels near the 3′ end of the genome and a lower expression level when the inserted gene is moved further away from the 3′ end with the exception for the insertion between p13 and p20 (
Plasmid Construction:
Three and four gene vectors were developed by introducing different combination of gene cassettes into the CTV genome at different locations. Three of the vectors were developed in CTV9RΔp33 in the pCAMBIA 1380 background (CTV33-BGFP-BYGUS-GTMVCP-79, CTV33-BGFP-GbFosC-BYbJunN-81 and CTV33-Δ13-BGFP-BYbJunN-GbFosC-82). The other three gene vectors (CTV-BASL-BYPTA-CP7-119, CTV-BASL-BYP10-CP7-131, CTV-BASL-BYPTA-CP10-120 and CTV-BRFP-BYGFP-CTMVCP-117) and one four gene vector (CTVΔ13-BRFP-GbFosC-BYbJunN-CTMVCP-118) were developed by modifying CTV9R in the background of pCAMBIA1380 altered by replacing the hygromycin ORF with the p22 ORF of Tomato chlorosis virus. For the ease of cloning the PstI restriction site in p33 ORF in full length CTV9R was eliminated by introducing a silent mutation using overlap extension PCR using primers 1749 and 1750 in combination with primer C-1436 and C-253 followed by digestion of both the overlap PCR product and CTV9R with XmaI and PmeI. Most of the gene cassettes were introduced into their locations by overlap extension PCR using the primers listed in table 1. The only exception was the insertion of green fluorescent protein cycle 3 in between the CPm and CP gene. Introducing the GFPC3 gene cassette into that location was done by restriction digestion of 9-47RGFP plasmid and point mutated CTV9R in pCAMBIA1380 with PmeI and PstI.
Expression of Three and Four Foreign Genes Simultaneously
After successfully expressing two genes in N. benthamiana and citrus with one and two different controller elements we are building vectors to express three and four foreign genes from three and four different controller elements, respectively. The reporter genes used in different combinations were the green fluorescent protein (cycle 3 GFP, GFPC3), red fluorescent protein (tag red fluorescent protein, RFP), Bimolecular fluorescence complementation using the bFos and bJun mammalian transcription factors (Hu et al., 2002), β-glucuronidase (GUS) gene from Escherichia coli and the Tobacco mosaic virus (TMV) coat protein gene (CP). Similarly, three gene vectors were built in different combinations to express two antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) from Tachypleus tridentatus and Sus scorfa, Allium sativum lectin (ASL) and Pinellia ternata agglutinin (PTA). The three gene vectors were either expressed from two or three locations within the CTV genome
Expression of Three Foreign Genes from Three Different Locations Simultaneously:
Six vectors were built to express three foreign genes from three different locations. The vectors were built to express the genes either from CTV9RΔp33 or full length CTV9R.
Vectors Built to Express Three Genes from Three Different Locations in CTV9RΔp33
Two vectors were built by inserting the three extra gene cassettes into CTV9RΔp33 creating expression vectors CTV33-BGFP-BYGUS-GTMVCP-79 (
Vectors Built to Express Three Genes from Three Different Locations in CTV9R
Four vectors were built to express three foreign genes from the same three different locations within the CTV genome. The three locations selected were insertion between CPm and CP, p13 and p20 and p23 and 3′UTR. For the ease of cloning into the full length CTV infectious clone a the PstI site within the p33 ORF was eliminated by introducing a silent point mutation by overlap extension PCR. Three of the four vectors were created by using different combinations of the two AMPs, ASL and PTA resulting in expression vectors CTV-BASL-BYPTA-CP7-119, CTV-BASL-BYP10-CP7-131 and CTV-BASL-BYPTA-CP10-120. The fourth vector named CTV-BRFP-BYGFP-CTMVCP-117 was created by inserting the ORFs of GFP, RFP and TMV CP under the control of BYV, BYSV and duplicated CP-CE of CTV. All the vectors were infiltrated into N. benthamiana to monitor the development of systemic infection. CTV-BASL-BYPTA-CP7-119 developed efficient systemic infection in 1 N. benthamiana plant. Plants infiltrated with vector CTV-BRFP-BYGFP-CTMVCP-117 revealed fluorescence in systemic leaves under hand held UV. Upon development of pronounced systemic infection, virions from CTV-BRFP-BYGFP-CTMVCP-117 will be concentrated over a sucrose step gradient and a sucrose cushion in order to inoculate citrus plants similar to the procedure recently followed for vector CTV-BASL-BYPTA-CP7-119
Expression of Three Foreign Genes from Two Different Locations Simultaneously:
Two vectors were created for the simultaneous expression of three genes from two different locations within the CTV genome. One vector was built in CTV9RΔp33 creating expression vector CTV33-BGFP-GbFosC-BYbJunN-81 whereas the other vector was built in full length CTV9R named CTVΔ13-GbFosC-BYbJunN-CTMVCP-129.
Vector Built to Express Three genes from Two different locations in CTV9RΔp33:
CTV33-BGFP-GbFosC-BYbJunN-81 (
Vector Built to Express Three genes from Two different locations in CTV9R:
CTV9R was modified by inserting a double gene cassette (bFosC ORF followed by bJunN ORF under the control of GLRaV-2 and BYSV CP-CE, respectively) as replacement of p13 and a gene cassette (TMV CP ORF under the control of the duplicated CP-CE) as an insertion between p23 and 3′UTR creating expression vector CTVΔ13-GbFosC-BYbJunN-CTMVCP-129 (
Expression of Four Foreign Genes from Three Different Locations Simultaneously:
In order to build the four gene vector we used four gene cassettes located at three different locations within the CTV genome. The RFP ORF was introduced between CPm and CP under the control of the BYV CP-CE, the two BiFC components bFosC and bJunN under the control of GLRaV-2 and BYSV respectively were introduced as a replacement of the p13 gene and the TMV ORF under the control of the duplicated CP-CE of CTV was introduced behind p23. The four gene vector named CTVΔ13-BRFP-GbFosC-BYbJunN-CTMVCP-118 was infiltrated into the N. benthamiana leaves for the development of systemic infection. Upon systemic infection virion concentration will be carried out over a sucrose step gradient and cushion for the infection of the citrus trees.
Discussion Related to Examples 1-8
In this work, CTV constructs that are extraordinarily permissive in allowing insertion of foreign sequences at different places in the 3′ portion of the genome are disclosed. Numerous different potential vector constructs to express foreign genes via additional subgenomic RNAs, di-cistronic mRNAs, or protease processing of fusion proteins were created and examined. Remarkably, most of these constructs functioned as vectors. Additionally, that the CTV constructs disclosed herein are capable of simultaneously producing large amounts of multiple foreign proteins or peptides.
The ultimate goal was to develop high expressing and stable vectors for the natural CTV host, citrus. Thus, virions were concentrated from N. benthamiana plants infected with 12 different constructs that spread and expressed moderate to high levels of the foreign protein(s) and used to inoculate citrus. C macrophylla plants became positive for infection between 6-60 weeks after inoculation depending on the insert length in the virus and the amount of virions concentrated from the N. benthamiana leaves that were used for inoculation. Most of the constructs that infected citrus produced moderate levels of the reporter gene/s.
Several approaches were examined for expression of foreign genes from CTV. The first approach was the “add-a-gene” strategy that involved the addition or duplication of a controller element and an additional ORF, which resulted in an additional subgenomic RNA. The “add-a-gene” approach was developed initially in TMV via duplicating the CP subgenomic promoter controlling a foreign gene (Dawson et al., 1989; Donson et al., 1991; Shivprasad et al., 1999). An advantage of this strategy is that it expresses the exact protein with no additional amino acids added to the N or/and C terminus which could affect its biological activity, at relatively high levels. However, there are limitations of this strategy that should be considered. Duplication of the controller element can lead to homologous recombination resulting in the loss of the gene of interest (Chapman et al., 1992; Dawson et al., 1989). Although this made the TMV insert unstable, it appeared to have little effect on the stability in CTV (Folimonov et al., 2007). The use of a heterologous controller element from related viruses stabilized the TMV insertions. However, heterologous controller elements usually are differentially recognized by the replicase complex of the virus (Folimonov et al., 2007; Shivprasad et al., 1999). This observation can be utilized to regulate the levels of desired gene expression (Shivprasad et al., 1999). An important consideration is that there can be competition between the different subgenomic RNAs of a virus. With TMV, the extra gene competed with the coat protein gene and the movement gene. There appeared to be a maximal capacity for production of subgenomic RNAs that was divided among the three RNAs. Manipulations that resulted in increases in one resulted in decreases in the others. One solution was to reduce coat protein production to allow optimal foreign gene and movement gene expression (Shivprasad et al., 1999; Girdishivelli et al., 2000). Yet, CTV subgenomic mRNAs appeared to be much less competitive (Folimonov et al., 2007; Ayllón et al., 2003).
In previous work, a CTV vector was created that expressed an extra gene between the CP and CPm genes that was an effective and stable vector in citrus trees. The foreign gene was in position 6 from the 3′ terminus (Folimonov et al., 2007). The position of the extra gene was chosen arbitrarily. Here the inventors continued vector design in an attempt to define the limits of manipulation of the CTV genome in producing extra proteins or peptides. The virus expresses its ten 3′ genes via sg mRNAs (Hilf et al., 1995). One rule of CTV gene expression is that genes nearer the 3′ terminus are transcribed higher than internal genes. For example, transcription of the p33 gene, which is at position 10 from the 3′ terminus, is very low in its native position, but transcription became very high when the p33 gene was moved near the 3′ terminus (Satyanarayana et al., 1999). Thus, expression of foreign genes from positions nearer the 3′ terminus might result in higher levels than from the position 6 arbitrarily chosen in the first vector (Folimonov et al., 2007). Yet, based on results from other viruses, only certain positions within the viral genome are likely to tolerate extra gene insertions. For example, with TMV or Alfalfa mosaic virus the location between CP and 3′NTR did not accommodate an insert (Dawson et al., 1989; Lehto and Dawson, 1990; Sanchez-Navarro et al., 2001). Remarkably, almost all of the constructs with insertions in CTV within the p13 deletion, between p13 and p20, and between p23 and the 3′ NTR were viable. In contrast, it was found that the only position the virus did not tolerate insertions was between the p20 and p23 genes. It is possible that these insertions interfered with the transcription of either of the adjacent genes.
Another strategy to express foreign genes in a viral vector consists of in-frame fusion of an ORF of interest to a viral ORF at either the N or C terminus. The two proteins can be released by engineering a protease and processing sites between the two proteins (Dolja et al., 1997; Gopinath et al., 2000). It was first adapted in the potyviridae, tobacco etch virus (Dolja et al., 1992). The major advantage of polyprotein fusion strategy is that the foreign protein is expressed in 1:1 ratio with the viral protein. A major limitation is that this process adds extra amino acids at the N and/or C termini of both proteins, which may affect their biological activities.
A series of constructs utilizing the HC-Pro or NIa proteases from potyviruses to enable post translational processing of the engineered polyprotein to release free GFP, protease, and the p23 protein were created. These vectors were able to systemically infect N. benthamiana. The systemic movement of these constructs was slower than the expression vector constructs containing only the GFP ORF as an extra gene. The slower systemic movement and the lower levels of GFP expression in the systemic leaves partially could be attributed to the extra C-terminal amino acids of p23 reduced its activity in RNA silencing suppression or amplification of viral RNAs or the protease processing delayed its activity. Although these constructs did not produce the maximal levels of foreign protein, they were viable vectors expressing substantial amounts of GFP.
Upon identifying the locations within the CTV genome that could accommodate foreign gene inserts, strategies were designed to construct viral vectors that express multiple genes. The first strategy depended on the use of a single controller element driving the transcription of a polypeptide gene. The fusion gene that consisted of GFP/Pro/GUS, ranged in size from 3127 nts to 3480 nts. Other strategies utilized two extra CEs to produce two extra sg RNAs simultaneously. This strategy gave the flexibility to insert the two genes in tandem in the same location or in two different locations. Both strategies worked.
Heterologous protein expression in whole plant is usually accomplished by development of transgenic plants by insertion of foreign DNA into the plastid or nuclear genome. Plastid transformation has been successful for only a few annual crops. Time and success of nuclear transformation varies among the different crops. Certain plants are more recalcitrant to transformation and subsequent regeneration than others. There are other disadvantages, particularly in perennial crops. For example, citrus has a long juvenile stage after regeneration that prolongs the time necessary to evaluate the horticultural characteristics and delays the time to commercial use. Another major disadvantage is that transformation is limited to the next generation of plants.
The inventors have now developed a series of different CTV vectors, each with different characteristics that are more effective under specific conditions. For example, with the “add-a-gene” vectors, the inventors would advocate the expression of a small gene in 3′ of the p23 gene in CTV for maximal expression. A medium gene could be more efficiently expressed from within the p13 area. A large gene probably would be better accommodated as an insertion between CP and CPm where it would disrupt the viral subgenomic RNAs less and result in better systemic invasion of the plant. For expression of smaller proteins, peptides, or RNAs to target RNA silencing, it is possible that the virus could accommodate 3 or 4 different genes. Different combinations of extra sg RNAs and protease processing can be chosen. Although two foreign proteins have been produced from other viruses, CTV is unique in usefulness because of its stability. The original vector has been continuously producing GFP for 8 years.
The uses of the CTV based expression vector have evolved since its inception. It was initially developed as a laboratory tool for citrus improvement. The vector was designed to express potential genes for transformation of citrus. Results of the effect of the heterologous gene in citrus, particularly if the effect was expected in mature tissue or fruit, could be obtained by the virus years before results would come from direct transformation. However, conditions and needs of the citrus industry have changed due to the invasion of a new bacterial disease referred to as Huanglongbing (HLB). This disease has spread so rapidly and is so damaging that the survival of the citrus industry is threatened. Initially, the CTV vector was used to identify antimicrobial peptides with activity against the HLB bacterium for transformation into citrus. However, the disease is spreading so rapidly that transgenic plants may not be available in time to save the industry. Due to the remarkable stability, the CTV vector now is being considered for use in the field to protect citrus trees and to treat infected trees until resistant transgenic plants become available. The CTV vector as a tool in the field to fight an invading disease of citrus is only one example of what viral vectors can do for agriculture. The possibilities are many for very stable vectors like those of CTV and perennial crops, particularly trees. Many trees are productive for 100 years or more. During the lifespan of the trees technologies changes and disease and pest pressures change. To improve trees by traditional transformation methods requires removing all of the present trees from the field and replanting. The use of a viral vector could add new genes to the existing trees.
While various disclosed embodiments have been described above, it should be understood that they have been presented by way of example only, and not limitation. Numerous changes to the subject matter disclosed herein can be made in accordance with this Disclosure without departing from the spirit or scope of this Disclosure. In addition, while a particular feature may have been disclosed with respect to only one of several implementations, such feature may be combined with one or more other features of the other implementations as may be desired and advantageous for any given or particular application.
Thus, the breadth and scope of the subject matter provided in this Disclosure should not be limited by any of the above explicitly described embodiments. Rather, the scope of this Disclosure should be defined in accordance with the following claims and their equivalents.
The terminology used herein is for the purpose of describing particular embodiments only and is not intended to be limiting. As used herein, the singular forms “a,” “an,” and “the” are intended to include the plural forms as well, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. Furthermore, to the extent that the terms “including,” “includes,” “having,” “has,” “with,” or variants thereof are used in either the detailed description and/or the claims, such terms are intended to be inclusive in a manner similar to the term “comprising.”
Unless otherwise defined, all terms (including technical and scientific terms) used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which embodiments belong. It will be further understood that terms, such as those defined in commonly used dictionaries, should be interpreted as having a meaning that is consistent with their meaning in the context of the relevant art and will not be interpreted in an idealized or overly formal sense unless expressly so defined herein.
The teachings of any patents, patent applications, technical or scientific articles or other references are incorporated herein in their entirety to the extent not inconsistent with the teachings herein.
This application is related to U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/537,154 filed Sep. 21, 2011, to which priority is claimed under 35 USC 119 and which is incorporated herein by reference and is a continuation-in-part of U.S. Ser. No. 12/174,159 filed Jul. 16, 2008 which issued is U.S. Pat. No. 8,629,334 on Jan. 14, 2014. The instant application contains a Sequence Listing which has been submitted in ASCII format via EFS-Web and is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. Said ASCII copy, created on Dec. 27, 2012, is named 10457204.txt and is 18,121 bytes in size.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 8389804 | Dawson et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
| 20100017911 | Dawson et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100333230 | Dolja et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20110119788 | Rodriguez et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
| Entry |
|---|
| Gowda et al. Infection of Citrus Plants with Virions Generated in Nicotiana benthamiana Plants Agroinfiltrated with a Binary Vector Based Citrus tristeza virus. Sixteenth IOCV Conference-CitrusTristeza Virus, p. 23-33, 2005. |
| Dafny-Yelin et al. Delivery of Multiple Transgenes to Plant Cells. Plant Physiol. vol. 145: 1118-1128, 2007. |
| Folimonov et al (A stable RNA virus-based vector for citrus trees. Virology 368, 205-216, available online Jul. 24, 2007). |
| Gowda et al (The p20 Gene Product of Citrus Tristeza Virus Accumulates in the Amorphous Inclusion Bodies. Virology 274, 246-254, 2000). |
| Folimonova, Svetlana Y. et al., “Infection with strains of Citrus tristeza virus does not exclude super infection by other strains of the virus”, Journal of Virology, Feb. 2010,vol. 84, No. 3, pp. 1314-1325. |
| Fagoaga, Carmen et al., “Post-Transcriptional Gene Silencing of the p23 Silencing Suppressor of Citrus tristeza virus Confers Resistance to the Virus in Transgenic Mexican Lime”, Plant Molecular Biology, Jan. 2006, vol. 60, No. 2, pp. 153-165. |
| Ehrengruber, Markus U et al., “Semliki forest virus vectors with mutations in the nonstructural protein 2 gen permit extended superinfection of neuronal and non-neuronal cells”, Journal of Neurovirology, 2007, vol. 13, No. 4, pp. 353-363, abstract only. |
| Gowda, S. et al., “Infection of Citrus Plants with Virions Generated in Nicotiana benthanniana Plants Agroinfiltrated with a Binary Vector Based Citrus tristeza virus”, Sixteenth IOCV Confere3nce, 2005—Citrus Tristeza Virus, pp. 23-33. |
| Dafny-Yelin, M. et al., “Delivery of Multiple Transgenes to Plant Cells”, Plant Physiology, 2007, vol. 145, pp. 1118-1128. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20130125254 A1 | May 2013 | US | |
| 20180030461 A9 | Feb 2018 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 61537154 | Sep 2011 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 12174159 | Jul 2008 | US |
| Child | 13624294 | US |
