1. Field of the Invention
Embodiments of the present invention generally relate to an apparatus and a method for use in abandonment of oil and gas wells. More particularly, embodiments of the invention relate to removal of well tubulars using a clamp for use with a cutting system on an offshore platform.
2. Description of the Related Art
After a well has depleted its particular pay zone of oil and/or gas, the well will typically be decommissioned. Decommissioning includes a number of activities, all designed to ensure the used well does not create environmental and safety concerns after its useful life is over. For example, lined wellbores extending into the earth are typically plugged with cement at various locations along their length to prevent the migration of remaining hydrocarbons to the surface where they could escape into the environment. In addition to plugging activities, equipment at or near the surface must be securely removed, and this is especially important for equipment related to offshore wells.
Offshore platforms, formed from a combination of steel and concrete, include legs that extend to and into the seabed. These immobile structures are designed to help drill the wells and typically remain in place over producing wells to facilitate the gathering of oil and gas. When the well's production is complete, the platforms are moved to another location or disassembled.
In addition to the platforms themselves, strings of tubulars extend from the platform floor down to the seabed providing a communication path for oil and gas from the subsea wellbore to the platform. In some cases, a single platform serves a number of subsea wellbores, each with its own tubular string extending upwards to the platform floor. When a well is decommissioned, these tubulars extending from the wellbore must also be removed, typically by severing them at some depth below the seabed. Each string of tubulars can include multiple strings of differing diameters, each housed within the next with an annular area formed therebetween. A conductor is usually the largest diameter tubular in a well, and its purpose is to prevent the soft formations near the surface from caving in and to conduct drilling mud from the bottom of the hole to the surface when drilling starts. Smaller tubular strings within the conductor include casing and production tubing. These smaller diameter strings can also extend to the platform and need removal. In some instances smaller tubulars are grouted, or cemented in the larger conductor string whereby the annuli is filled with cement-like substances. In other instances the tubular strings within the conductor are not grouted and are therefore independent of each other.
Tubular removal can be carried out with mechanical or abrasive tools and methods. Mechanical cutting devices include cutters or knives disposed on a tool that is run into the tubular string on a work string to a depth where cutting is to take place. The tool is actuated, usually by rotation, and a wall of the tubular is destroyed as the cutters separate the tubular into an upper and a lower portion. Thereafter the tool is removed and the severed portion of tubular string is pulled up to the platform or a vessel, usually with the help of a crane or some type of jack.
Other cutting means include abrasive water jet cutting. An abrasive water jet cutter is also operated from inside a tubular string and severs the tubular by penetrating the wall with high-energy, high-velocity abrasive-filled water. Abrasive water jet cutters are especially effective for cutting multiple strings of tubulars in one operation, like successively smaller strings within a conductor. U.S. Pat. No. 7,178,598 entitled “Device for a Hydraulic Cutting Tool” and assigned to the assignee of the present invention, describes a method and apparatus for severing or cutting a tubular at a location below the seabed, and that patent is incorporated herein in its entirety.
Unlike mechanical cutting, abrasive water jet cutting produces a very “clean” cut, removing very little material from the tubular wall as the cut is made. Because so little material is removed, there is very little movement of the tubular string at the surface and often no way to be certain that the cut has been completed and the tubular severed. For this reason, abrasive water jet cuts are “proven” by lifting the upper portion of the tubular at least several inches to demonstrate its readiness for hoisting to the platform floor. To quickly and easily prove the cut, a typical jet cutting assembly includes a pair of cylinders that pull upwards on the tubular after the cut is made. If the tubular has been successfully cut, the upper portion will move upwards to prove the cut. If not, the cutting apparatus (which is still in tubular) is once again operated until the cut can be successfully proven. In the case of multiple tubular strings, an operator knows the cut is successful and all tubulars have been cut if the outer conductor is liftable. Once the cut has been proven, the cutting assembly is relocated to another conductor on the platform or to another job. A large-capacity crane, typically on a derrick barge, collects the severed strings for disposal.
One time-consuming aspect of proving abrasive water jet cuts on offshore tubulars involves the connection means needed between the lifting cylinders and an upper end of the tubular. Currently, lifting lugs are welded onto opposite sides of the tubular wall prior to the cutting operation to provide a lifting connection. The lifting lugs are necessary because without them there would be no way to effectively connect the tubular to the lifting cylinders so that its weight can be borne in the proving process. While the lifting lugs are effective, their installation requires time and a skilled worker's attendance on the platform and requires welding or other hot work that is considered a dangerous activity, even on a non-producing well. Further the welded lifting lugs are permanently installed, and their location on the tubular cannot be changed or adjusted in the event that the lugs are needed in a different rotational or axial location on the tubular.
Therefore, there is a need for a simple, flexible and cost-effective apparatus and method for making a temporary attachment to tubulars for proving an abrasive water jet cut.
The present invention generally relates to an apparatus and method for proving a severed well tubular. In one aspect the cutting is done in a well decommissioning procedure and is performed at a location below the seabed of a well by an abrasive water jet cutter. In one aspect, a mechanical clamp is disposed on an upper portion of the tubular. The clamp has lifting lugs on its outer surface for connection to a lifting apparatus and the clamp has slip members on its inner diameter, thereby permitting the clamp to bear the weight of the tubular so that it can be lifted at least far enough to prove the cut.
In another aspect, a method of using a tubular clamp in a system that includes a cutting tool and a lifting assembly is provided. The method includes the step of opening the tubular clamp and placing the tubular clamp around a tubular. The method further includes the step of closing the tubular clamp around the tubular. The method also includes the step of connecting the tubular clamp to the lifting assembly. Additionally, the method includes the step of pulling on the tubular clamp using the lifting assembly after the cutting tool cuts the tubular. In another aspect, the clamp is opened, repositioned and closed again at another axially and/or rotationally distinct location on the tubular.
So that the manner in which the above recited features of the present invention can be understood in detail, a more particular description of the invention, briefly summarized above, may be had by reference to embodiments, some of which are illustrated in the appended drawings. It is to be noted, however, that the appended drawings illustrate only typical embodiments of this invention and are therefore not to be considered limiting of its scope, for the invention may admit to other equally effective embodiments.
The present invention generally relates to an offshore rig or platform in a decommissioning operation. The tubular clamp is used with a cutting system typically on an offshore platform. The cutting system is configured to cut the tubular and then lift an upper portion of the tubular to prove or verify the cut. In the description that follows, like parts are marked throughout the specification and drawings with the same number indicator. The drawings may be, but are not necessarily to scale, and the proportions of certain parts have been exaggerated to better illustrate details and features of the invention. To better understand the aspects of the present invention and the methods of use thereof, reference is hereafter made to the accompanying drawings.
The cutting and lifting system 300 includes a cutting assembly 200 that is used to cut the tubular 10 (
Thereafter, the cutting tool 210 is retrieved from inside the tubular 10, and the tubular clamp 100 is released from the upper portion 10A of the tubular 10. At this time, the cutting and lifting system 300 may be removed from the rig 10 or to some other location on the rig to perform a cut on another tubular. The severed tubular will typically be lifted onto the platform and cut into pieces and removed by conventional, well known means. Typically, a high-capacity crane is used to lift the severed section at which time a pin can be inserted through the tubing to help hold all the various strings while it is cut into pieces. The tubing clamp 100 can be left in place or reinstalled to permit the crane to initially lift the tubing section to the platform floor.
The tubular clamp disclosed herein has significant advantages over the prior art methods of providing a lifting means to a tubular for proving a cut. In addition to eliminating the need for a skilled welder, the clamp is easily installed, adjusted and removed, providing flexibility in the rotational and axial placement of the lifting lugs that is not possible with welded lugs. For example, in one embodiment, the clamp is installed at a location of a tubular later determined to have been weakened due to corrosive wear. Rather than cutting and re-welding the lugs, the clamp can be loosened, moved and retightened in a more appropriate location. In one example, a tubular cut is proven without the cylinders shown in
While the discussion and examples provided herein have dealt primarily with offshore tubulars, the present invention with its methods can be practiced at any location, including land-based wells where tubular strings require cutting and the cut requires proving.
While the foregoing is directed to embodiments of the present invention, other and further embodiments of the invention may be devised without departing from the basic scope thereof, and the scope thereof is determined by the claims that follow.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3299954 | Williams et al. | Jan 1967 | A |
3461958 | Brown | Aug 1969 | A |
3557564 | Hauber | Jan 1971 | A |
3748702 | Brown | Jul 1973 | A |
3894326 | Merriman | Jul 1975 | A |
3983936 | Kennard et al. | Oct 1976 | A |
4209066 | Watson | Jun 1980 | A |
4249610 | Loland | Feb 1981 | A |
4269277 | Baugh | May 1981 | A |
4528910 | Blanc et al. | Jul 1985 | A |
4703802 | Bryan et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
4844660 | Ortemond | Jul 1989 | A |
5092711 | Langner | Mar 1992 | A |
5238069 | Schaefer et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5318115 | Rouse | Jun 1994 | A |
5386746 | Hauk | Feb 1995 | A |
5467833 | Crain | Nov 1995 | A |
5507596 | Bostelman et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5848647 | Webre et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
6192981 | Boquet et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6357528 | Davis et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6640939 | Buck | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6763753 | Brumley et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6845814 | Mason et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
7090019 | Barrow et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7222677 | Webre et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7306404 | Torgersen | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7681631 | Thomas et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7757754 | McKay | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7823632 | McAfee et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
8020627 | Shahin et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8056633 | Barra et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8291977 | Mire | Oct 2012 | B2 |
20060108122 | Buytaert et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20090308605 | McAfee et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100038080 | McAfee et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20110132594 | Slack | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110209872 | McAfee et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20120145405 | Vanderford et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120018164 A1 | Jan 2012 | US |