The present invention relates to systems for communicating data via a communication channel. More particularly, the present invention relates to a communication scheme for a class A-B line driver that can be used with, for example, gigabit Ethernet or the like.
A gigabit channel is a communication channel with a total data throughput of one gigabit per second. A gigabit channel typically includes four unshielded twisted pairs (hereinafter “UTP”) of cables (e.g., Category-5 twisted pair cables) to achieve this data rate. I.E.E.E. Standard 802.3 ab, herein incorporated by reference, describes the specifications for 1000BASE-T twisted-pair gigabit Ethernet. For signal transmission, various types of output stages can be used to drive resistive loads, such as UTPs, for data transmission in accordance with Ethernet network protocols, such as gigabit Ethernet.
For purposes of illustration,
In 100BASE-T, for example, three transmit symbols are used: {−1, 0, 1}, where a positive pulse represents a “+1,” a negative pulse represents a “−1,” and the signal represents “0” otherwise. For purposes of illustration,
Consequently, there is a need for a transmission scheme that can make transformer behavior more linear, as well as reduce EMI in the transformer.
A class A-B differential line driver is disclosed that can be used with, for example, gigabit Ethernet and the like. In accordance with exemplary embodiments of the present invention, according to a first aspect of the present invention, a line driver includes a first driver circuit. The first driver circuit is configured to generate a first component signal of a differential signal at a first polarity. The line driver includes a second driver circuit. The second driver circuit is configured to generate a second component signal of the differential signal at a second polarity. The first and second component signals are biased to form biased first and second component signals. A differential amplitude of a combination of the biased first and second component signals is less than a corresponding differential amplitude of the differential signal. The line driver includes an offset signal circuit in communication with the first and second driver circuits. The offset signal circuit is configured to generate an offset signal for offsetting the biased first and second component signals. A combination of the offset and biased first and second component signals forms the differential signal.
Further areas of applicability of the present disclosure will become apparent from the detailed description provided hereinafter. It should be understood that the detailed description and specific examples, while indicating the preferred embodiment of the disclosure, are intended for purposes of illustration only and are not intended to limit the scope of the disclosure.
Other objects and advantages of the present invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art upon reading the following detailed description of preferred
Exemplary embodiments of the present invention are directed to a communication or transmission scheme for a class A-B differential line driver, transmitter, digital-to-analog converter (DAC) or the like that can be used with, for example, gigabit Ethernet or any suitable transmission protocol or network standard. According to exemplary embodiments, an offset current, IOFFSET, is used to offset each of the signal components of a differential output signal in, for example, class A-B operation, in addition to the bias current that is used in such operation, thereby resulting in a higher minimum current. As an additional offset current is used, the maximum amplitude or magnitude of each of the signal components of the differential output signal can be reduced by a proportional amount. The combination of the offset current, bias current and signal components results in a differential signal of a desired differential amplitude (e.g., as that required by the transmission scheme, transmission protocol or network standard). However, because the current level of the signal components has been reduced, the amount of electro-magnetic interference (EMI) induced in the isolation transformer or hybrid (e.g., used for interfacing a transmitter to a communication channel) is reduced by a proportional amount. The transformer core is also biased at a higher minimum current, thereby resulting in behavior that is more linear. Additionally, by taking advantage of the coding scheme used to transmit symbols, the full offset current need not be produced at all times. Thus, exemplary embodiments of the present invention provide a transmission scheme that offers a reduction in EMI in, and an improvement of linear behavior of, a transformer or other suitable hybrid, and allows for an increase in the center tap current of the transformer without a correspondingly large increase in power consumption.
As used herein, a “line driver” can be any suitable type of transmitter or amplifier for transmitting signals via a communication channel. For example, a line driver can be used as a DAC or other like device.
These and other aspects of the present invention will now be described in greater detail.
The line driver 201 includes a bias signal circuit 215 in communication with the first and second driver circuits 205 and 210. The bias signal circuit 215 is configured to generate a bias signal for biasing the first and second component signals. The bias signal can be any suitable quiescent or bias current or voltage for biasing the first and second driver circuits 205 and 210, in accordance with the transmission scheme used. For example, for class A-B operation, the bias signal can be approximately five to ten percent of the maximum amplitude of the signal components.
As discussed previously,
However, according to exemplary embodiments, because an additional offset signal is used, the signal levels of the first and second signal components can be reduced.
According to exemplary embodiments of the present invention, the line driver 201 includes an offset signal circuit 220 in communication with the first and second driver circuits 205 and 210. The offset signal circuit 220 is configured to generate an offset signal for offsetting the biased first and second component signals. The offset signal can be any suitable offset current or voltage for offsetting the biased first and second component signals. The combination of the offset and biased first and second component signals forms the differential transmit signal. The magnitude of the offset signal will depend on the amount of reduction in the signal levels of the first and second component signals 305 and 310.
In the present illustration, the current level of the component signals has been reduced from 40 mA to 30 mA, a twenty-five percent reduction in current levels. Accordingly, EMI induced in the transformer or hybrid (such as that used in line interface circuit 203) will be proportionally reduced by the same amount (e.g., twenty-five percent). Additionally, as a higher minimum current is being used to bias the transformer (e.g., IOFFSET+IBIAS=10 mA+2 mA=12 mA), the behavior of the transformer will be more linear.
The line driver 201 includes a summing circuit 225 in communication with the first and second driver circuits 205 and 210. The summing circuit 225 is configured to combine the offset and biased first and second component signals to form the differential transmit signal. The line driver 201 can include a bias signal control circuit 230 in communication with the bias signal circuit. The bias signal control circuit 230 is configured to control the bias signal circuit 215 to alter the bias signal, IBIAS, to any desired value. The line driver 201 can include an offset signal control circuit 235 in communication with the offset signal circuit 220. The offset signal control circuit 235 is configured to control the offset signal circuit 220 to alter the offset signal, IOFFSET, to any desired value. Either or both of the bias and offset signals can be varied, depending on, for example, the transmission protocol or network standard and class of operation used. Additionally, the line driver 201 can include a driver control circuit 240 in communication with the first and second driver circuits 205 and 210. The driver control circuit 240 is configured to control generation of the first and second component signals by the first and second driver circuits 205 and 210, respectively, in accordance with, for example, the transmission protocol or network standard used. For example, the driver control circuit 240 can be configured to control each driver circuit by turning each driver circuit on or off to generate the appropriate transmit signal.
Exemplary embodiments of the present invention also provide a power advantage by leveraging the coding scheme used to encode and transmit symbols and other data. In other words, for the given illustration, although an offset signal of 10 mA has been used to boost the minimum current and achieve a differential current of 40 mA, the full offset signal is not required to be produced at all times, because of the coding scheme used. The 100BASE-T and 1000BASE-T network standards will be used to illustrate the advantage.
In 100BASE-T, three transmit symbols are used: {−1, 0, 1}. Such a transmission scheme is illustrated in transmit signal VTX 130 of
For class A operation, the average current through the transformer is given by Equation (2), as follows:
IAVE=40 mA+2 mA=42 mA (2)
For class B operation, the average current through the transformer is given by Equation (3), as follows:
As can be seen by comparing Equations (1) and (3), adding an offset signal of 10 mA (in the class A-B operation) increases the average current by 26 mA−22 mA=4 mA, when compared with the class B operation. Thus, the transformer is conducting only 40% of the added offset signal.
When no data is being communicated, idle data is transmitted as an indication that the communication link is up. Columns 430, 435 and 440 of
As these examples illustrate, the total power consumption will increase by a fraction of the increase in the center tap current. In other words, exemplary embodiments of the present invention can provide for an increase in the center tap current of the transformer without a corresponding increase in power consumption.
Other configurations of line driver 201 can be used. For example, first and second driver circuits 205 and 210 can feed into offset signal circuit 220 for the offset signal. The summing circuit 225 can form part of the line interface circuit 203, rather than a portion of the line driver 201. Alternatively, the bias signal control circuit 230, offset signal control circuit 235 and driver transmission control circuit 240 can be located remotely from line driver 201 (e.g., off chip), with the appropriate control signals supplied to the line driver 201. Additionally, the control functions provided by these control circuits can be combined into a single control circuit or fewer control circuits than three. Other configurations can also be used.
For example, each of the first and second driver circuits 205 and 210 can be comprised of first and second sets of transmitters, respectively.
As illustrated in
Alternatively, the first and second driver circuits 205 and 210 can be replaced with a plurality of transmitters, with each transmitter comprised of a first driver circuit and a second driver circuit.
As illustrated in
First and second current drivers 205 and 210, bias signal circuit 215, offset signal circuit 220, summing circuit 225, bias signal control circuit 230, and offset signal control circuit 235 can each be implemented using any suitable electrical or electronic device capable of performing the functions associated with the respective element. For example, first and second current drivers 205 and 210 can each comprise a current source or any other suitable electrical device capable of generating a component signal of a differential transmit signal at a given polarity. For example, the offset signal circuit 220 can be comprised of a voltage follower in combination with a bias resistor that develops a stable reference current through one leg of a current mirror. The stable reference current can be mirrored to an output current (IOFFSET) having a particular value defined by the stable reference current and the transistor geometries of the devices defining the current mirror. Other implementations and configurations of the respective elements can be used.
Additionally, first and second current drivers 205 and 210, bias signal circuit 215, offset signal circuit 220, summing circuit 225, bias signal control circuit 230, and offset signal control circuit 235 can be formed on a monolithic substrate. In other words, the elements of the line driver can be constructed of common integrated circuit elements and can be implemented on a single chip along with the remaining components of, for example, a high speed bidirectional communication transceiver or the like. In accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the present invention, the transformer or hybrid portion of the line interface circuit 203 is contemplated as an off-chip circuit element. Even though the exemplary embodiment contemplates the transformer being provided off-chip, it will be understood by skilled artisans familiar with integrated circuit design and fabrication that suitable transformers can be constructed from integrated circuit elements, such as combinations of spiral inductors and the like, and still provide sufficient DC coupling between the communication channel 204 and an integrated circuit transceiver.
While the line driver has been described in terms of integrated circuit technology implementing, for example, a gigabit-type multi-pair Ethernet transceiver or the like, it will be evident to one having ordinary skill in the art that the invention can be suitably implemented in other semiconductor technologies, such as bipolar, bi-CMOS, and the like, as well as be portable to other forms of bidirectional communication devices that operate in, for example, full duplex mode. According to an alternative exemplary embodiment, each component or device of line driver can be formed on, for example, a separate substrate and can be in communication with another component or device using any appropriate type of electrical connection that is capable of carrying electrical information. In other words, the circuitry according to the present invention can be constructed from discrete components as opposed to a monolithic circuit.
The line driver according to exemplary embodiments can be compatible with any suitable wired or wireless transmission protocol or network standard, such as, for example, 10BASE-T, 100BASE-T, 100BASE-TX, 1000BASE-T, 10 GBASE-T or the like. For example, the line driver can be configurable to accommodate both 1.0 V output swings characteristic of 1000BASE-T operation and 2.5 V output swings characteristic of 10BASE-T operation. For example, in 1000BASE-T (gigabit Ethernet), the differential transmit signal can comprise a gigabit Ethernet signal. The line interface circuit 203 can be any suitable type of interface circuit capable of interfacing the line driver with the communication channel 204, such as the interface circuit 110 illustrated in
According to exemplary embodiments, the method of communicating information illustrated in
Exemplary embodiments of the present invention can be used in any suitable application or system capable of communicating information, such as any appropriate form of transmitter or transceiver. For example, the line driver 201 illustrated in
It will be appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art that the present invention can be embodied in various specific forms without departing from the spirit or essential characteristics thereof. The presently disclosed embodiments are considered in all respects to be illustrative and not restrictive. The scope of the invention is indicated by the appended claims, rather than the foregoing description, and all changes that come within the meaning and range of equivalence thereof are intended to be embraced.
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 11/067,749, filed on Mar. 1, 2005, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,839,994, issued Nov. 23, 2010. The disclosure of the above application is incorporated herein by reference.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3986131 | Ross et al. | Oct 1976 | A |
| 4092613 | Boubouleix | May 1978 | A |
| 4160216 | Thornton | Jul 1979 | A |
| 4295101 | Leidich | Oct 1981 | A |
| 4296382 | Hoover | Oct 1981 | A |
| 4335360 | Hoover | Jun 1982 | A |
| 4415865 | Gustafsson | Nov 1983 | A |
| 4419631 | Bertails et al. | Dec 1983 | A |
| 4458213 | Quan | Jul 1984 | A |
| 4491804 | Main | Jan 1985 | A |
| 4529948 | Bingham | Jul 1985 | A |
| 4570128 | Monticelli | Feb 1986 | A |
| 4587491 | Koterasawa | May 1986 | A |
| 4607233 | Van Tuijl | Aug 1986 | A |
| 4682119 | Michel | Jul 1987 | A |
| 4752745 | Pass | Jun 1988 | A |
| 4814723 | Botti | Mar 1989 | A |
| 4970471 | Taylor | Nov 1990 | A |
| 4999586 | Meyer | Mar 1991 | A |
| 5039953 | Su | Aug 1991 | A |
| 5057789 | Nagaraj | Oct 1991 | A |
| 5148120 | Kano et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
| 5294892 | Ryat | Mar 1994 | A |
| 5334950 | Arimoto | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5337007 | Barrett et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5382838 | Sasaki et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
| 5412344 | Franck | May 1995 | A |
| 5426641 | Afrashteh et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
| 5442319 | Seesink et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5442320 | Kunst et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5475343 | Bee | Dec 1995 | A |
| 5491448 | Naokawa et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
| 5497122 | Somayajula | Mar 1996 | A |
| 5497124 | Yamashita et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
| 5504458 | Van Brunt et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5512857 | Koskowich | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5621357 | Botti | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5654672 | Bailey et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5786731 | Bales | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5825244 | Somayajula | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5825246 | Koifman | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5854573 | Chan | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5856759 | Krochmal | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5900783 | Dasgupta | May 1999 | A |
| 5963093 | Corsi | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5963094 | Linder et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 6037825 | Kung | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6078220 | Bales | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6084477 | Corsi | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6094571 | Groe | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6121839 | Giacomini | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6124740 | Klemmer | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6127891 | Eschauzier | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6154063 | Fang | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6166503 | Korbel et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6188281 | Smith et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6194966 | Dasgupta | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6255909 | Muza | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6259280 | Koelling | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6259745 | Chan | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6281751 | Maulik | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6294958 | Eschauzier | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6313667 | Eschauzier | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6353298 | Jeffrey | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6366169 | Ivanov | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6369553 | Davis | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6374043 | El-Sherif et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6384585 | Cusinato et al. | May 2002 | B2 |
| 6417733 | Corsi et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6445530 | Baker | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6459338 | Acosta et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6486736 | Cusinato et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
| 6492870 | Escobar-Bowser | Dec 2002 | B2 |
| 6496067 | Behzad et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6501334 | Corsi et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6529071 | Casier et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
| 6535063 | Gibson et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| 6542032 | Escobar-Bowser et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
| 6545538 | Ivanov et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6553081 | Goodson | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6573795 | Whitney et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
| 6583669 | Eschauzier et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
| 6590453 | Tran et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
| 6614306 | Morrish | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6624696 | Eschauzier et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6710654 | Parkhurst et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
| 6720798 | Mulder et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
| 6720817 | El-Gamal | Apr 2004 | B2 |
| 6727758 | Govil | Apr 2004 | B2 |
| 6750716 | Cusinato et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6784739 | Reffay et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
| 6816014 | Whitney et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
| 6826655 | Arimilli et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
| 6826658 | Gaither et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
| 6836186 | Lee et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
| 6844837 | Sutardja et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
| Entry |
|---|
| IEEE Standards B02.3ab, Mar. 8, 2002, pp. 147-249. |
| You, Fan, et al., “Low-Voltage Class AB Buffers with Quiescent Current Control,” IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 33, No. 6, Jun. 1998, pp. 915-920. |
| Giustolisi, G., et al., “1.2-V CMOS Op-Amp with a Dynamically Biased Output Stage,” IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 35, No. 4, Apr. 2000, pp. 632-636. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 11067749 | Mar 2005 | US |
| Child | 12950722 | US |