1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to a classification device for classifying toner particles for use in image forming methods such as electrophotography, electrostatic recording, electrostatic printing, and toner jet recording.
2. Discussion of the Background
Methods of manufacturing toner are broadly divided into pulverization methods and polymerization methods. A typical pulverization method includes, for example, processes of mixing a binder resin (for fixing a toner on a recording medium) and a colorant (for providing the toner with a color), optionally along with additives such as a charge controlling agent (for providing the toner with chargeability), a magnetic material (for providing the toner with transportability), a release agent, and a fluidizer; melt-kneading the mixture; cooling and solidifying the melt-kneaded mixture; pulverizing the solidified mixture into fine particles; classifying the fine particles by size and collect desired-size particles; and mixing the collected particles with an external additive to obtain a toner. Such a toner is generally used for image forming. The toner may be further mixed with a magnetic carrier to be used for two-component developing methods.
Recent toners have a small particle diameter for high-definition printing while including a low-melting point binder resin and a release agent (such as a wax) for high-speed printing. Such toner particles having a particle diameter of 2 μm or less generally have poor heat-resistant storage stability, and are likely to cause the problems called “background fouling” and “filming”. “Background fouling” is a phenomenon in which the background portion of an image is disadvantageously soiled with toner particles. “Filming” is a phenomenon in which toner particles disadvantageously form thin film thereof on a photoreceptor, etc. Therefore, it is better to remove toner particles having a particle diameter of 2 μm or less from the resultant toner.
Classification devices for manufacturing toners are divided into impeller types and non-impeller types. Impeller-type classification devices include what is called a tandem toner separator (hereinafter “TTSP”), which is one of wind power classifiers. A typical TTSP performs classification by balancing centrifugal force generated from blades provided on a rotor and centripetal force generated from fan suction force of the rotor. The centrifugal force collects coarse particles, whereas the centripetal force collects fine particles from the periphery of the rotor. A typical TTSP includes a single casing, within which two impeller-type classification rotors are provided with one end of each of which being supported. The impeller-type classification rotors are capable of being driven by a motor, and the axes thereof are coincident. The first end of each of the classification rotors in the axial direction is covered with a cover disc without penetration hole, and the second end thereof is equipped with a cover disc with a penetration hole for discharging fine particles or middle-size particles. The two classification rotors are provided so that the surfaces of the first ends thereof face with each other. As a result, a minute drift space is formed therebetween in the axial direction.
To respond to recent demands for high image quality, a small-size toner with a narrow size distribution is sought because such a toner provides good dot reproducibility. Dots formed with such a small-size toner are unlikely to vary even after developing or transfer processes. Therefore, a toner manufacturing apparatus is demanded which can accurately classify particles by size, in other words, which can remove particles with a particle diameter of 2 μm or less and collect particles with a particle diameter of from 3 to 4 μm so that a resultant toner has an average particle diameter of about 5 μm with a high yield.
Additionally, toners are simultaneously required to be fixable at low temperatures from the viewpoint of reduction of consumption energy, to include a low-softening-point binder resin from the viewpoint of color mixing, and to include a release agent to be applicable to oilless fixing processes. Such toners may have adhesion or fusion property.
In particular, such a toner having the above-described properties and a particle diameter with 2 μm or less have poor heat-resistant storage stability, and are likely to cause the problems of background fouling and filming. Therefore, a classification device which can remove toner particles with a particle diameter of 2 μm or less is demanded.
A conventional TTSP has a problem that desired-size toner particles with a particle diameter of from 3 to 4 μm are also removed along with fine particles when the maximum peripheral speed of the rotor is about 65 m/s, especially when the toner particles are for use in two-component development or non-magnetic one-component development. This is because the weight of such toner particles is very small.
Even if the classification device disclosed in Japanese Patent Application Publication No. 2008-026457 is improved so that the rotor can rotate at a peripheral speed of 70 m/s or more, it is likely that toner particles as final products adhere to the spiral member due to centrifugal force generated by the rotor. Further, because the outlet part provided on the base of the outlet short pipe is narrow, emission efficiency is also reduced due to adhesion and fusion of the toner particles to the outlet part.
When a TTSP operates continuously, the following problems may arise.
Japanese Patent Application Publications Nos. 2004-198640, 2001-293438, 2006-293268 and 2008-161823, and International Patent Application Publication No. WO2004/088431 each disclose a classification device or a method of manufacturing toner using a classification device. However, these classification devices or methods are required to more improve their classification accuracy.
Accordingly, an object of the present invention is to provide a classification device which reliably classifies toner particles by size with high efficiency and high yield without causing adhesion of toner particles.
These and other objects of the present invention, either individually or in combinations thereof, as hereinafter will become more readily apparent can be attained by a classification device for classifying particles by size, comprising:
an upper impeller-type rotor, a first end of which is covered with a cover disc without penetration hole and a second end of which is covered with an upper cover disc with a penetration hole; and
a lower impeller-type rotor, a first end of which is covered with a cover disc without penetration hole and a second end of which is covered with a lower cover disc with a penetration hole;
wherein the upper impeller-type rotor and the lower impeller-type rotor are provided so that axes thereof are coincident and the first ends face with each other forming a gap therebetween in an axial direction, and
wherein diameters of the penetration holes of the upper cover disc and the lower cover disc are different.
These and other objects, features and advantages of the present invention will become apparent upon consideration of the following description of the preferred embodiments of the present invention taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein:
Exemplary embodiments of the present invention are described in detail below with reference to accompanying drawings. In describing exemplary embodiments illustrated in the drawings, specific terminology is employed for the sake of clarity. However, the disclosure of this patent specification is not intended to be limited to the specific terminology so selected and it is to be understood that each specific element includes all technical equivalents that operate in a similar manner.
An exemplary embodiment of the present invention provides a classification device including an impeller-type classifier what is called a tandem toner separator (TTSP).
The TTSP illustrated in
More specifically, referring to
Similarly, within the lower casing 4 that symmetrically faces the upper casing part 3 while their axes are coincident, a drive axis 10 of the classification rotor 9 is rotatably engaged with a bearing, not shown. The classification rotor 9 is driven by a driving motor 12. The driving motor 12 is connected to the drive axis 10 and the classification rotor 9 via a transmission mechanism 12′.
One end of each of the classification rotors 5 and 9 is supported. The drive axes 7 and 10, fine particle discharge chambers 14 and 13, and the bearings, not shown, are symmetrically provided on the upper-end side and the lower-end side of the axes, respectively. The cover disc 16 without penetration hole and the cover disc 15 without penetration hole, which are closed, are also symmetrically provided toward the center sides of the axes. Centrifugal rings 29 and 28 are also symmetrically provided toward the upper-end side and the lower-end side of the axes, respectively. The cover disc 160 with a penetration hole and the cover disc 150 with a penetration hole are also symmetrically provided toward the upper-end side and the lower-end side of the axes, respectively.
A short pipe 17 is provided above the classification rotor 5. Particles T to be classified are charged from one point on the circumference of the classification rotor 5 through the short pipe 17. An outlet short pipe 18b for discharging coarse particles (i.e., product particles) is provided below the classification rotor 9. Classification air is provided from classification air supply parts 19 and 20 which are opened toward the direction of the tangent lines of the circumferences of the classification rotors 5 and 9.
Within the classifier 1, the classification rotors 5 and 9 are symmetrically facing each other while their axes are coincident. The cover disc 16 without penetration hole of the classification rotor 5 and the cover disc 15 without penetration hole of the classification rotor 9 are parallel to each other with a gap therebetween. In one embodiment, the classification rotors 5 and 9 rotate in the same direction. When the classification rotors 5 and 9 are adjusted to rotate at the same rotation number, particles are classified into fine particles and coarse particles (i.e., product particles). In this case, the fine particles are discharged from the fine particle discharge chambers 13 and 14 whereas the coarse particles (i.e., product particles) are discharged from the outlet short pipe 18b. Alternatively, when the classification rotors 5 and 9 are adjusted to rotate at different rotation numbers, the fine particle discharge chamber 14 discharges fine particles, the fine particle discharge chamber 13 discharges middle-size particles, and the outlet short pipe 18b discharges coarse particles (i.e., product particles). In another embodiment, the classification rotors 5 and 9 rotate in opposite directions. A drift space B is formed between the cover discs 16 and 15.
The classifier 1 includes a classification space 26 that is a cylindrical space in contact with the outer circumferential surface of the classification rotors 5 and 9. The classification space 26 is formed with a ring member that is provided coaxially with the classification rotors 5 and 9 forming a gap between the outer circumferential surface of the classification rotors 5 and 9. The ring member is comprised of a spiral member 27. (A spiral member for the classification rotor 9 is omitted in
Referring to
When the diameters of the penetration holes 161 and 151 of the cover discs 160 and 150 of the upper and lower classification rotors 5 and 9, respectively, are different, centripetal forces are controllable even when centrifugal forces generated due to rotations of the classification rotors 5 and 9 are the same. As a result, classification can be performed efficiently and accurately. It can be prevented that an excessive amount of fine particles are removed at the lower classification rotor 9. It can be also prevented that product particles (i.e., desired-size particles) are immixed in fine particles. Accordingly, product particles can be collected with high accuracy and high yield.
It is preferable that the cross-sectional area A1 of the penetration hole 161 and the cross-sectional area A2 of the penetration hole 151 satisfy the formula A1>A2. It is more preferable that the formula 0.8×A1≦A2≦0.98×A1 is satisfied. When the formula A1>A2 is satisfied, centripetal force of the lower classification rotor 9 is reduced and the classification point is shifted to a small-particle-diameter side. Therefore, the peripheral speed of the classification rotors needs not to be maximized and desired-size particles can be collected at a peripheral speed of about from 40 to 60 m/s. Additionally, toner particles which are stagnating at the narrow outlet part of the base of the outlet short pipe 18b may be discharged more effectively, resulting in classification with high accuracy and high efficiency.
It is preferable that the static pressure P1 (kPa) of an inflow air passing through the penetration hole 161 of the cover disc 160 and the static pressure P2 (kPa) of an inflow air passing through the penetration hole 151 of the cover disc 150 satisfy the formula P1<P2. It is more preferable that the formula P2−0.3≦P1≦P2−0.1 is satisfied. When the formula P1<P2 is satisfied, centripetal force of the lower classification rotor 9 significantly improves, resulting in classification with high accuracy and high efficiency at low speeds. It is preferable that P2 is about from 15 to 25 kPa.
As illustrated in
It is preferable that the height H1 of the penetration hole 161 and the height H2 of the penetration hole 151 satisfy the formula H1>H2. It is more preferable that the formula 1.1×H2≦H1≦1.3×H2 is satisfied. When the formula H1>H2 is satisfied, product toner particles may be discharged from the outlet short pipe 18b that is provided below the classification rotor 9. As a result, the toner concentration increases at the periphery of the upper classification rotor 5, preventing the product toner particles from passing through the upper penetration hole 161. This may result in classification with high accuracy and high yield. The height H1 is preferably about 5 to 50 mm, and more preferably about 15 to 35 mm.
It is preferable that a minus static pressure PS1 (kPa) at a vicinity of a classifier outlet part 18a and a minus static pressure PS2 (kPa) at the outlet short pipe 18b satisfy the formula PS1<PS2. In other words, the suction pressure of the outlet pipe is lower than the inner pressure of the classifier. It is more preferable that the formula PS2−0.4≦PS1≦PS2−0.05 is satisfied.
When the formula PS1<PS2 is satisfied, the suction pressure within the outlet short pipe 18b increases and the classified toner particles are smoothly discharged from the outlet short pipe 18b, effectively preventing adhesion of the toner particles. To satisfy the formula PS1<PS2, for example, the outlet short pipe 18b may be connected to a hose to be sucked. The minus static pressure PS2 is preferably about −0.05 to −0.4 kPa.
Having generally described this invention, further understanding can be obtained by reference to certain specific examples which are provided herein for the purpose of illustration only and are not intended to be limiting. In the descriptions in the following examples, the numbers represent weight ratios in parts, unless otherwise specified.
In the following examples, particle diameter distributions of toners are measured using a particle size measuring instrument such as COULTER COUNTER TA-II and COULTER MULTISIZER III (both from Beckman Coulter K. K.).
First, 0.1 to 5 ml of a surfactant (preferably an alkylbenzene sulfonate) is contained in 100 to 150 ml of an electrolyte as a dispersing agent. The electrolyte is a 1% NaCl aqueous solution which is prepared from a first grade sodium chloride, such as ISOTON-II (from Beckman Coulter K. K.). Next, 2 to 20 mg of toner particles are added to the electrolyte to prepare a toner suspension. The toner suspension is subjected to a dispersion treatment using an ultrasonic dispersing machine for about 1 to 3 minutes. The toner suspension is then subjected to a measurement of the volume and the number of the toner particles using the above-described measuring instrument with an aperture of 100 μm to determine the volume distribution and the number distribution. The weight average particle diameter (D4) and the number average particle diameter (D1) are calculated from the volume distribution and the number distribution.
Channels include the following 13 channels: 2.00 or more and less than 2.52 μm; 2.52 or more and less than 3.17 μm; 3.17 or more and less than 4.00 μm; 4.00 or more and less than 5.04 μm; 5.04 or more and less than 6.35 μm; 6.35 or more and less than 8.00 μm; 8.00 or more and less than 10.08 μm; 10.08 or more and less than 12.70 μm; 12.70 or more and less than 16.00 μm; 16.00 or more and less than 20.20 μm; 20.20 or more and less than 25.40 μm; 25.40 or more and less than 32.00 μm; and 32.00 or more and less than 40.30 μm. Namely, particles having a particle diameter of 2.00 μm or more and less than 40.30 μm can be measured. Particles having a particle diameter of 2.00 μm or less are measured using an instrument FPIA-2100 (from Sysmex Corporation).
(Preparation of Toner)
A mixture of 82 parts of a polyester resin (i.e., a binder resin), 2 parts of a zinc salt of 3,5-di-t-butylsalicilic acid (i.e., a charge controlling agent), 5 parts of a carnauba wax (i.e., a release agent), and 10 parts of a carbon black (i.e., a colorant) is melt-kneaded using a double-axis kneader and the melt-kneaded mixture is cooled to be solidified. The solidified mixture is pulverized into coarse particles, which are a raw material of a toner.
Next, 600 kg of the raw material are pulverized into particles, which are to be classified, using a jet mill. The particles have a weight average particle diameter (D4) of 4.70 μm and include particles with a particle diameter of 4 μm or less in an amount of 87.0% by number. The ratio (D4/D1) of the weight average particle diameter (D4) to the number average particle diameter (D1) is 1.33.
Next, 200 kg of the particles are subjected to a continuous classification treatment under the conditions in which a rotor peripheral speed is 58 m/sec or 62 m/sec and an input is 60 kg/h, so that the ratio (D4/D1) of the resultant classified particles becomes 1.28. The conditions and results of the classification treatment are shown in Table 1.
It is apparent from Table 1 that the classification device of the present invention provides reliable classification.
Image Evaluation 1
To prepare a toner A, 100 parts of the particles classified in Example 1 are mixed with 0.2 parts of silica particles and 0.2 parts of titanium oxide particles using a HENSCHEL MIXER, followed by sieving. To prepare a two-component developer A, 5 parts of the toner A are mixed with 95 parts of a silicone-coated carrier having a weight average particle diameter of 55 μm using a TURBULA MIXER.
The two-component developer A is set in an image forming apparatus IMAGIO MP 4000 (from Ricoh Co., Ltd.) to produce an image. The resulting image is very sharp and smooth.
Image Evaluation 2
To prepare a toner B, 100 parts of the particles classified in Comparative Example 1 are mixed with 0.2 parts of silica particles and 0.2 parts of titanium oxide particles using a HENSCHEL MIXER, followed by sieving. To prepare a two-component developer B, 5 parts of the toner B are mixed with 95 parts of a silicone-coated carrier having a weight average particle diameter of 55 μm using a TURBULA MIXER.
The two-component developer B is set in an image forming apparatus IMAGIO MP 4000 (from Ricoh Co., Ltd.) to produce an image. The resulting image has poor sharpness and granularity.
This document claims priority and contains subject matter related to Japanese Patent Application No. 2008-308889, filed on Dec. 3, 2008, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Having now fully described the invention, it will be apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art that many changes and modifications can be made thereto without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as set forth therein.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2008-308889 | Dec 2008 | JP | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1934406 | Coe | Nov 1933 | A |
2638219 | Gordon et al. | May 1953 | A |
3367502 | Cravens | Feb 1968 | A |
3929293 | Hahn et al. | Dec 1975 | A |
4857178 | Barthelmess | Aug 1989 | A |
5103981 | Abbott et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5205415 | Surtees | Apr 1993 | A |
5476109 | Coleman et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5575824 | Brown et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5798025 | Iwashige | Aug 1998 | A |
5957299 | Keuschnigg et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5994016 | Kuramoto et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6033722 | Koike et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6171448 | Iwashige | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6286771 | Brown et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6318561 | Zampini et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6368765 | Izu et al. | Apr 2002 | B2 |
6503681 | Makino et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6575391 | Brown et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6586151 | Naka et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6613490 | Matsunaga et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
7032849 | Takahashi et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7318990 | Makino et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7358024 | Naka et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7498114 | Makino et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7866582 | Nied | Jan 2011 | B2 |
20030000869 | Morales Tirado et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030178514 | Makino et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20050003294 | Murakami et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20060063091 | Makino et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060214036 | Makino | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060222980 | Makino et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20080227022 | Noge et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20090206008 | Makino et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20120280071 | Manola | Nov 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
4-243582 | Aug 1992 | JP |
2001-293438 | Oct 2001 | JP |
2002-126651 | May 2002 | JP |
2004-198640 | Jul 2004 | JP |
2006-293268 | Oct 2006 | JP |
2008-26457 | Feb 2008 | JP |
2008-161823 | Jul 2008 | JP |
WO 2004088431 | Oct 2004 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Office Action issued Sep. 4, 2012, in Japanese Patent Application No. 2008-308889. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100072115 A1 | Mar 2010 | US |