This application is a national stage of, and claims priority to, Patent Cooperation Treaty Application No. PCT/EP2019/083642, filed on Dec. 4, 2019, which application claims priority to German Application No. DE 10 2018 131 380.2, filed on Dec. 7, 2018, which applications are hereby incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.
The disclosure relates to a cleaning device for cleaning an application device (e.g. print head or non-atomizing application device) which, in operation, applies at least one coating agent jet of a coating agent (e.g. paint, adhesive, sealant) to a component (e.g. motor vehicle body component). Furthermore, the disclosure comprises an operating method for such a cleaning device.
In modern painting systems for painting motor vehicle body components, rotary atomizers are usually used as application device, which atomize the coating agent to be applied and deliver a spray cloud of the coating agent. When the color is changed or during breaks in operation (e.g. during a shift change or at the weekend), these rotary atomizers must be cleaned on the outside and inside to prevent contamination with paint residues or adhesion of paint residues. For this purpose, cleaning devices are known from the prior art, which are described, for example, in EP 1 671 706 A2, DE 10 2014 006 647 A1 and DE 10 2010 052 698 A1.
However, a disadvantage of the known rotary atomizers is the fact that the application efficiency is not 100%, so that part of the applied paint has to be disposed of as overspray.
To avoid this problem, a more recent line of development envisages the use of so-called print heads as application devices instead of rotary atomizers, as described for example in DE 10 2013 002 412 A1. Such print heads do not emit a spray jet, but instead emit narrowly limited coating agent jets from small nozzles, so that no overspray occurs during operation. By “coating agent jet” can be understood both a coherent jet, not yet subject to natural decay, and a directed jet consisting at least in part of droplets.
However, a problem with such print heads is the fact that the nozzles of the print heads can become clogged during operation, leading to malfunction. DE 10 2016 014 951 A1 therefore discloses a jet checking device that can detect such clogging of a coating agent nozzle of such a print head.
A disadvantage of the prior art is therefore the fact that the known cleaning devices are designed for rotary atomizers and are therefore not suitable for print heads. A further disadvantage of the prior art is that the cleaning of the print heads on the one hand and the inspection of the coating agent jets on the other hand have so far had to be carried out in separate devices.
Finally, with regard to the general technical background of the disclosure, reference should be made to EP 3 354 354 A1, DE 11 2016 001 682 T5 and DE 10 2016 206 995 A1.
The disclosure describes a cleaning device for an application device (e.g. print head) and a jet checking device in a single structural unit. First of all, this offers the advantage that only one device is required for jet checking and for cleaning. A further advantage is that one of two collecting devices for paint residues can be dispensed with, since otherwise separate devices would require one collecting device each for the cleaning device and for the jet checking device. In addition, the disclosure makes it possible to provide a central solution for paint booths and to dispense completely with a washout or dry separation system.
With regard to the design features of the cleaning device, reference can be made in part to the prior art, so that reference can be made, for example, to DE 10 2010 052 698 A1 (also cited as United States Patent Application Publication No. US2014/0075695 A1 and U.S. Pat. No. 9,452,451 B2), DE 10 2014 006 647 A1 (also cited as United States Patent Application Publication No. US2017/0072421 A1 and U.S. Pat. No. 10,426,253 B2) and EP 1 671 706 A2 (also cited as United States Patent Application Publication Nos. US 2007/0089762 A1; US2008/0236484 A1; US 2007/0090128 A1 and U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,721,745 B2; 7,908,994 B2; and 8,418,647 B2) which are incorporated herein by reference. With regard to the constructive design of the jet checking device, reference can also be made in part to the prior art as described, for example, in DE 10 2016 014 951 A1 (also cited as United States Patent Application Publication No. US 2019/0308211 A1) which is incorporated herein by reference.
In a preferred embodiment of the disclosure, the application device to be cleaned and measured is a print head as known, for example, from DE 10 2013 002 412 A1 (also cited as United States Patent Application Publication No. US 2015/0375258 A1) which is incorporated herein by reference. At this point, however, it should be mentioned that the term of a print head used in the context of the disclosure serves to distinguish it from atomizers which apply a spray cloud of the atomized coating agent (e.g. paint). In contrast, a print head in the sense of the disclosure emits one or more narrowly limited coating agent jets, which can, for example, have a jet widening angle of less than 5° or 2°, 1°, 0.5° or 0.1°. Such print heads are thus essentially free of overspray, i.e. the application efficiency is practically 100%.
It should be mentioned here that the coating agent jets can optionally consist of individual, separated coating agent drops or of a sequence of coating agent drops. Alternatively, it is possible for the individual coating agent jets to be connected in the longitudinal direction of the jet, whereby these alternatives are known from the prior art cited at the beginning and therefore need not be described in detail.
In the preferred embodiment of the disclosure, the jet checking device comprises a sensor, in particular an optical sensor, such as a camera or a high-speed camera, for detecting the at least one coating agent jet.
In the case of checking the at least one coating agent jet by means of an optical sensor, the jet checking device has an illumination source, preferably a backlight source, which emits a light beam onto the optical sensor, the coating agent jet to be checked running in the beam path of the light beam between the backlight source and the optical sensor, so that the optical sensor checks the coating agent jet in the backlight.
In the preferred embodiment of the disclosure, the light beam of the back light source extends transversely (e.g., at right angles, orthogonally) to the coating agent jet to be inspected. In this case, the light beam of the back light source extends transversely, in particular substantially at right angles, to the jet plane.
In another embodiment, the light beam of the back light source runs tangentially, in particular essentially at an angle of 0°, to the jet plane.
It is also possible to check both orientations of the back light source to the jet plane in succession. For this purpose, either the opening in the cleaning device must be large enough to accommodate the jets at both orientations, or there must be two separate openings with different orientations. Furthermore, it is possible to make the collecting device movable, in particular rotatable, in order to be able to check the different orientations of the jet plane.
Furthermore, it should be mentioned that the application device (e.g. print head) typically emits several parallel coating agent jets which lie in a common jet plane. Here, the light beam of the back light source is preferably aligned transversely (e.g., perpendicularly, orthogonally) to the jet plane of the coating agent jets.
Furthermore, it should be mentioned that the jet checking device preferably comprises an optical diffuser arranged in the jet path of the back light source between the back light source and the coating agent jet to be checked, so that the back light is diffuse.
For example, the diffuser may be arranged in a fixed position so that diffuse backlight is used in any operating condition. However, it is alternatively possible that the diffuser is arranged to be movable and can be selectively moved into or out of the beam path of the back light source to selectively provide the back light diffusely or in a focused form.
Furthermore, it should be mentioned that the jet checking device preferably inspects the coating agent jet in a specific inspection region (ROI: Region of Interest), wherein the spatially limited inspection region is preferably located immediately after the exit from the application device, i.e. immediately in front of the nozzle openings of the application device, for example at a distance of 0-100 mm, especially of 0-70 mm, in particular of 0-40 mm.
In addition, the preferred embodiment has an evaluation unit which is connected to the sensor on the input side and determines at least one of the following variables from the sensor signal:
With regard to the structural design of the cleaning device, it should be mentioned that the cleaning device preferably comprises a cleaning container for receiving the application device or at least the coating agent jets emitted by the application device during cleaning. The cleaning container preferably has an insertion opening, which is preferably arranged on the upper side of the cleaning container, for receiving the application device to be cleaned or at least the coating agent jets emitted by the application device. The insertion opening is preferably sufficiently large to receive all of the coating agent jets from the application device without the coating agent jets contaminating the outer surface of the cleaning device.
In a particular embodiment, the cleaning device has at least one additional opening into which the application device dispenses the coating during the measurement, i.e., an opening for the cleaning process and at least one additional opening for the jet checking process.
Preferably, at least one cleaning nozzle is arranged in the cleaning container for spraying the application device from the outside with a cleaning fluid. For example, the cleaning fluid may be a rinsing agent for water-based fluids or for fluids based on organic solvents. This also includes mixtures containing other substances in addition to water and/or organic solvents, such as wetting agents, co-solvents or other additives. The cleaning nozzle may be stationarily arranged in the cleaning container. Preferably, however, the at least one cleaning nozzle is arranged movably in the cleaning container, for example rotatably or pivotably, whereby the cleaning effect can be improved. However, the cleaning nozzle can also be moved linearly (back and forth), for example by means of a cylinder. On its underside, the cleaning tank can have a discharge to allow residues of the coating agent and the cleaning agent to be drained off into a recirculation system. Furthermore, it should be mentioned that at least one cleaning nozzle is preferably arranged in the cleaning container in order to blow a drying gas (e.g. compressed air) onto the application device from the outside. Similar to the cleaning nozzle, the drying nozzle can be rotatably or pivotally mounted or moved linearly (back and forth).
The cleaning nozzle preferably emits a flat jet of the cleaning agent from a substantially linear nozzle arrangement, for example, from a slot nozzle or from numerous outlet nozzles arranged in a row of nozzles. The application device can also have several application nozzles arranged in a nozzle row. Here, it is advantageous if the linear nozzle arrangement of the cleaning nozzles is aligned essentially parallel to the nozzle row of the application nozzles. The flat jet of cleaning agent preferably strikes the row of application nozzles obliquely from below, at an angle of 5-45°, in particular 15-35°, relative to the jet direction of the application nozzles. It is advantageous if the point of impact of the cleaning agent is not directed directly onto the application nozzles in order to prevent cleaning agent from entering the application nozzles or paint from being flushed out of the application nozzles.
With regard to the drying nozzle, it should be mentioned that this can also be stationary or movable. If the drying nozzle is movable, it can be moved by a pneumatic linear cylinder, for example. The drying nozzle also emits the drying gas preferably in the form of a flat jet from a substantially linear nozzle arrangement, in particular from a slot nozzle or from numerous outlet nozzles arranged in a row of nozzles. Here, the linear nozzle arrangement of the drying nozzles is preferably oriented transversely to the nozzle row of the application nozzles.
Furthermore, the cleaning device may comprise a moisture retaining device to keep the outlet nozzles of the application device moist. Such a moisture-retaining device may, for example, comprise a trough, a nonwoven fabric, a sponge, and/or a porous material that is impregnated with a solvent or through which the solvent flows. For example, the moisture-retaining device may also comprise a supply line and/or a discharge line for the solvent.
It should be mentioned, however, that it is possible within the scope of the operating method according to the disclosure for cleaning and jet measurement to be carried out several times in succession. The cleaning of the application device (e.g. print head) is then repeated until the subsequent jet checking of the applied coating agent jets shows that proper jet delivery is taking place. With this cyclic repetition of cleaning and jet measurement, it is possible that increasingly intensive cleaning programs are used.
In the drawing, the coating agent jets 2 are emitted into an insertion opening 3 of a cleaning device 4, the cleaning device 4 being shown here only schematically.
The cleaning device 4 has a drain 5 on its underside for discharging residual coating agent and rinsing agent.
The print head 1 can be cleaned in the cleaning device 4. For this purpose, the print head 1 is lowered onto the cleaning device 4, as will be described in detail.
In
First of all, the jet checking device comprises a back light source 6 which guides a light beam 7 through a diffuser 8 so that the coating agent jets 2 are illuminated with a diffuse back light.
Furthermore, the jet checking device comprises a camera 9, which is arranged in the beam path of the light beam 7 of the back light source 6 behind the coating agent jets 2 and measures the coating agent jets 2.
The light beam 7 of the back light source runs at an angle β=90° to the coating agent jets 2 and at an angle α=90° to the nozzle row in the print head 1.
The image signal from the camera 9 is then forwarded to an evaluation unit 10, which evaluates the image signal and can determine, for example, the number of the coating agent jets 2, the exit angle of the coating agent jets 2, the decay length of the coating agent jets 2 and other variables.
It should be mentioned here that the jet checking device is drawn separately from the cleaning device 4 in the drawing. However, this is only to illustrate the operation of the jet checking device. In fact, the jet checking device and the cleaning device 4 form a structural unit.
In the following, the embodiment according to
It can be seen from
In the following, the flow chart according to
In a first step S1, the print head 1 is moved to the cleaning position as shown in
In a subsequent step S2, the print head 1 is then cleaned in the cleaning position by the cleaning device 4.
Subsequently, in a step S3, the painting robot 11 then moves the print head 1 to a checking position shown in
In a step S4, the print head 1 then ejects the coating agent jets 2.
In a step S5, the coating agent jets 2 are then measured by the camera 9.
If the evaluation in a subsequent step S7 then shows that the coating agent jets 2 are not emitted properly, steps S1-S6 are repeated with renewed cleaning.
If, on the other hand, the evaluation shows that the coating agent jets 2 are properly emitted, the print head 1 is ready for normal application of the coating agent in a step S7.
A special feature of this embodiment is that the light beam 7 of the back light source 6 runs at an angle α=0° in the jet plane of coating agent jets 2.
Finally, the drawing also shows a jet checking device 16, which is used to measure the coating agent jets emitted by the application device, as described above.
The dashed line here illustrates that the jet checking device 16 and the cleaning device 12 form a structural unit.
It should be mentioned here that the control system controls both the cleaning device 12 and the jet checking device 16 and the painting robot 15.
The disclosure is not limited to the preferred embodiments described above. Rather, a large number of variants and variations are possible which also make use of the idea of the disclosure and therefore fall within the scope of protection.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2018 131 380.2 | Dec 2018 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2019/083642 | 12/4/2019 | WO |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2020/115117 | 6/11/2020 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5589225 | Yamada et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5627571 | Anderson | May 1997 | A |
6811807 | Zimmermann et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
7721745 | Baumann et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7908994 | Herre et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
8418647 | Martin | Apr 2013 | B2 |
9452451 | Kleiner et al. | Sep 2016 | B2 |
10426253 | Baumann et al. | Oct 2019 | B2 |
10906058 | Nelson et al. | Feb 2021 | B2 |
20040221804 | Zimmermann et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050237357 | Usuda | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20070089762 | Baumann et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070090128 | Martin | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20080236484 | Herre et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20100214597 | Hasseler | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20140075695 | Keliner et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20150375258 | Fritz et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20170072421 | Baumann et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20180052443 | Van Riet et al. | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180214901 | Nelson et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20190308211 | Fritz | Oct 2019 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
19508725 | Sep 1995 | DE |
19936790 | Feb 2001 | DE |
102007036585 | Apr 2009 | DE |
102010052698 | May 2012 | DE |
102013002412 | Aug 2014 | DE |
102014006647 | Nov 2015 | DE |
102016206995 | Oct 2017 | DE |
112016001682 | Feb 2018 | DE |
102016014951 | Jun 2018 | DE |
0110634 | Jun 1984 | EP |
1671706 | Jun 2006 | EP |
3354354 | Aug 2018 | EP |
3435260 | Aug 2003 | JP |
2005305869 | Nov 2005 | JP |
2011011431 | Jan 2011 | JP |
2012135746 | Jul 2012 | JP |
2011201308 | Jan 2013 | JP |
2015066531 | Apr 2015 | JP |
2017074535 | Apr 2017 | JP |
2020501880 | Jan 2020 | JP |
20110001443 | Jan 2011 | KR |
WO-2012044307 | Apr 2012 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/EP2019/083642 mailed Mar. 18, 2020 (14 pages; with English translation). |
Office Action from German Patent Office for Application No. DE 10 2018 131 380.2 mailed Sep. 10, 2019 (3 pages; English translation not available). |
Notification of Reasons for Rejection from the Japan Patent Office for related application No. JP2021532170 mailed Sep. 26, 2023 (9 pages; with English translation). |
EPO Draft Office Action for related Application No. EP 19817623.2 (with English machine translation). |
Japan Patent Office Notification of Reasons for Rejection for related application No. JP2021-532170 mailed Feb. 13, 2024 (11 pages; with English translation). |
Notification of Reasons for Rejection from the Japan Patent Office for related application No. JP2021-532170 mailed Jul. 2, 2024 (5 pages; with English translation). |
Korean Intellectual Property Office Notice of Office Action for related application No. KR10-2021-7021276 mailed Aug. 19, 2024 (19 pages; with English translation). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20220040719 A1 | Feb 2022 | US |