This application is a National Stage Application of International Application No. PCT/EP2012/071318, filed Oct. 26, 2012, which claims priority to International Application No. PCT/EP2011/068743, filed Oct. 26, 2011, the entire disclosures of which are expressly incorporated by reference herein.
The present invention relates to a nozzle for a vacuum cleaner comprising a rotatable member and a cleaning arrangement for removing articles entangled to the rotatable member. The invention is intended for battery powered vacuum cleaners as well as mains-operated vacuum cleaners. The nozzle according to the present invention is further envisaged for robotic vacuum cleaners.
In vacuum cleaning nozzles provided with a rotatable member, i.e. a rotatable brush roll, it is known that threads, lint, human or animal hairs or any other fibrous material tend to cling or wrap around adhere to the brush roll during operation of the vacuum cleaner. This may impair the functioning of the cleaning nozzle.
In WO2009/117383A2 it is disclosed a cleaning nozzle for a vacuum cleaner provided with a rotary brush having projecting friction surfaces and one or more cleaning members for removing debris that has been wrapped around the rotary brush. The cleaning members are positioned adjacent the rotary brush and are adapted to move between a resting position and a cleaning position, and are arranged to clean the rotary brush during rotation of the brush. Debris that has been collected on a rotary brush is often difficult to remove because it has wrapped tightly around the brush roll and intertwined the bristles. Therefore, a significant force is needed to be able to thread off the entangled threads by means of a cleaning member pressing against a friction member. Such a force may be applied manually by a user of the vacuum cleaner. The electrical vacuum cleaner or motor brush head need to be capable of providing the necessary power to obtain rotation of the brush roll when such force is applied.
A drawback with the disclosed design is that contact between the cleaning member and the friction member of the brush roll occurs at multiple positions at any given brush roll orientation, which may deteriorate performance of normal cleaning operation when the brush roll is subject to a cleaning action.
An object of the present invention is to overcome at least one of the above mentioned drawback relating to multiple contact positions between the brush roll friction member and the cleaning member.
According to an aspect of the invention a nozzle for a vacuum cleaner is provided. The nozzle comprises a rotatable member for picking up particles from a surface to be cleaned. The rotatable member is arranged around a longitudinal axis. The nozzle further comprises a cleaning arrangement for removing articles entangled to the rotatable member. The cleaning arrangement comprises at least one support surface provided on at least one radially projecting member of the rotatable member, and at least one cleaning member being movable between a resting position in which the cleaning member is arranged at a distance from the support surface and at least one cleaning position in the vicinity of the rotatable member in which the cleaning member, during rotation of the rotatable member, co-operates with at least one segment of the support surface to remove any entangled articles from the rotatable member. Further, the at least one support surface comprises a plurality of segments, each of the segments being arranged at an individual radius in relation to the longitudinal axis.
Thus, at least one support surface comprising a plurality of segments where each of the segments is arranged at an individual radius in relation to the longitudinal axis. By choosing proper radius of the segments, the cleaning member will be in contact with a limited area of the support surface. Contact in a limited area such as a single point ensure efficient cleaning while still not disturbing normal cleaning operation. Further, by obtaining a limited area of support surface contact with the cleaning member, such as in a single point, the necessary power to obtain rotation of a rotatable member, such as a brush roll, is limited compared to earlier solutions.
In an embodiment of the present invention, the cleaning member comprises a resilient sheet member capable of providing a resilient contact with at least one segment of the at least one support surface in the at least one cleaning position during rotation of the rotatable member.
By providing resilient contact for a cleaning action, the necessary power to obtain rotation of a rotatable member, such as a brush roll, is limited compared to earlier solutions.
Thereby, proper cleaning function is ensured during cleaning action. Further, by choosing proper radius of the segments of the at least one support surface, the resilient sheet member of the cleaning member will be in resilient contact with a limited area of the support surface. Contact in a limited area such as a single point ensure efficient cleaning while still not disturbing normal cleaning operation.
According to another aspect of the invention, a vacuum cleaner provided with such a nozzle is provided.
In embodiments, the radius of the segments is gradually changed whereby the segments form a continuous support surface.
In embodiments, a plurality of support surfaces is arranged on a plurality of radially projecting members.
In embodiments, the cleaning member comprises a longitudinal bar holding the resilient sheet member. The longitudinal bar is arranged along a longitudinal axis of the rotatable member.
In embodiments, the resilient sheet member of the cleaning member in the at least one cleaning position meets a tangent of the at least one segment of the at least one support surface at an angle α which is in the range of 40°-90°. The angle is chosen to enable efficient cleaning but still enable rotational movement of the rotatable member of the nozzle to ensure proper cleaning function during cleaning operation.
In embodiments, the resilient sheet member has a thickness in the range of 0.2-0.8 mm.
In embodiments, the at least one radially projecting member is helically arranged along a longitudinal axis of the rotatable member. The helical arrangement ensures proper cleaning of the rotatable member during rotation while at the same time the cleaning interaction is performed within a limited support surface. Thereby, the impact on the rotational speed of the rotatable member is reduced and an effective cleaning action is performed while at the same time normal cleaning operation is maintained.
In embodiments, one single radially projecting member is helically arranged along a longitudinal axis of the rotatable member.
In embodiments, a plurality of radially projecting members is helically arranged along a longitudinal axis of the rotatable member.
In embodiments, the cleaning member is pivotally arranged via the longitudinal bar above the rotatable member such that the cleaning member is pivoted from the resting position above the rotatable member to the at least one cleaning position.
In embodiments, the cleaning member is moved from the resting position to the at least one cleaning position by applying a pressing force to a push button provided on the nozzle at a surface turned towards a user.
In embodiments, the cleaning member is connected via a linking mechanism shaft to the push button on the nozzle.
In embodiments, at least one protruding part is arranged on the nozzle at a surface turned towards the surface to be cleaned. When a cleaning action is performed, the protruding part prevents the nozzle from tilting due to the force applied on it.
In embodiments, the rotatable member comprises radial ribs arranged perpendicular to the longitudinal axis of the rotatable member.
In embodiments, the radial ribs extend from the rotatable member to the at least one projecting member creating multiple pockets along the rotatable member. The multiple pockets hinder entangled articles from wandering towards the middle segment of the rotatable member. Thereby, entangled articles are distributed along the length of the rotatable member. Even distribution of the entangled articles is advantageous because the layers of entanglement will be fewer. Fewer revolutions of the rotatable member will then be needed for proper cleaning. The total cleaning time is thereby reduced.
In embodiments, a plurality of support surfaces is arranged on a plurality of radially projecting members.
In embodiments, the nozzle further comprises a nozzle cover that at least partly is made of transparent material such that the rotatable member may be visible through the nozzle cover. Thereby, the user is able to see if there are a lot of entangled articles present requiring a cleaning action to be performed.
Further features of, and advantages with, the present invention will become apparent when studying the appended claims and the following description. Disclosed features of example embodiments may be combined to create embodiments other than those described in the following as readily understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which this invention belongs, without departing from the scope of the present invention, as defined by the appended claims.
The various aspects of the invention, including its particular features and advantages, will be readily understood from the following detailed description and the accompanying drawings, in which:
The present invention will now be described more fully with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which example embodiments are shown. However, this invention should not be construed as limited to the embodiments set forth herein. Throughout the following description similar reference numerals have been used to denote similar elements, parts, items or features, when applicable.
In a cleaning position, a resilient sheet member 5a of the cleaning member 5 co-operates with the support surface 4 during rotation of the rotatable member 3 to remove any entangled articles from the rotatable member 3. The resilient sheet member 5a is capable of providing a resilient contact with the support surface 4 in the cleaning position during rotation of the rotatable member 3. Thereby, the possible slow down of the rotational speed of the rotatable member 3 due to the cleaning action will be limited if there is a lot of entangled articles to be removed. The nozzle 1 comprises a cover 12 that at least partly is made of transparent material such that the rotatable member 3 may be visible through the nozzle cover 12. The transparency enables a user to see if a cleaning action is needed or not.
In
A problem during cleaning of the brush roll is that entanglement around the brush roll seems not to be evenly spread along the length of the brush roll. Instead, entanglement is of greatest magnitude in the middle segment of the brush roll. Such uneven distribution of the entangled articles is disadvantageous from a brush roll cleaning perspective because cleaning of the top layers of entanglement are performed for each revolution of the brush roll, i.e. the more the layers of entangled articles at a specific segment the longer the total cleaning time. Therefore, the brush roll cleaning time is dependent on the maximum layers of entanglement at one specific segment of the brush roll. Therefore it is more beneficial if the total entanglement is spread out along the length of the brush roll. As seen from the
When in use, the cleaning arrangement works as follows. During brush roll cleaning the cleaning member 5 will interact and apply pressure on a support surface 4 provided on a rotatable brush roll provided in the nozzle 1 of a vacuum cleaner. During the cleaning process, the motor fan of the vacuum cleaner is also turned on. The support surface 4 is the only area of the brush roll, apart from the bristles, that will be in contact with the cleaning member 5 during a cleaning process. For a full revolution of the brush roll, the entire support surface 4 will have been in contact with the cleaning member 5 and therefore will any entangled article be exposed to the cleaning interaction in between these parts. Entangled articles will get torn into smaller pieces by the tearing, or friction, caused by the cleaning member 5 at the support surface. These torn articles may be separated from the brush roll by the airflow of the vacuum cleaner in combination with centrifugal force due to the rotational movement of the brush roll and will end up in the dust container or dust bag of the vacuum cleaner. The bristles of the brush roll will flex below the cleaning member 5 during brush roll cleaning. Since it is the pressure that the cleaning member 5 applies on the surface of the support surface 4 that generates the majority of the tearing friction, the bristles will not be exposed to the same wear as the entangled articles. Further, since the resilient sheet member 5a is able to flex, a consistent interaction in between the resilient sheet member 5a and the support surface 4 during brush roll cleaning is achieved, which in turn will lower the tolerances. The brush roll cleaning performance is dependent on the rotational speed of the brush roll; the higher speed, the faster brush roll cleaning. Further on the speed is closely related to the torque; an increased torque will decrease the speed. It is therefore important to find a state were the applied torque is high enough for efficient brush roll cleaning whilst at the same time low enough to not decrease the speed too much.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2011/068743 | Oct 2011 | WO | international |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2012/071318 | 10/26/2012 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2013/060879 | 5/2/2013 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
804213 | Chaplin | Nov 1905 | A |
969441 | Backer | Sep 1910 | A |
1231077 | Scheffler | Jun 1917 | A |
1268963 | Gray | Jun 1918 | A |
1412420 | Polansky | Apr 1922 | A |
1757461 | Losey | May 1930 | A |
1813325 | Smith | Jul 1931 | A |
1820350 | Dance | Aug 1931 | A |
1907692 | White | May 1933 | A |
1965614 | Sellers | Jul 1934 | A |
1999696 | Kitto | Apr 1935 | A |
2032345 | Cranon | Mar 1936 | A |
2625698 | De Kadt | Jan 1953 | A |
2642601 | Saffioti | Jun 1953 | A |
2642617 | Lilly | Jun 1953 | A |
2663045 | Conway | Dec 1953 | A |
2733000 | Sparklin | Jan 1956 | A |
2741785 | Siebert | Apr 1956 | A |
2789306 | Kath | Apr 1957 | A |
2904818 | Sheahan | Sep 1959 | A |
2960714 | Senne | Nov 1960 | A |
2975450 | Williams | Mar 1961 | A |
3268936 | Fukuba | Aug 1966 | A |
3470575 | Larson | Oct 1969 | A |
3536977 | Porter | Oct 1970 | A |
3683444 | Schaefer | Aug 1972 | A |
3722018 | Fisher | Mar 1973 | A |
3862467 | Krickovich | Jan 1975 | A |
3863285 | Hukuba | Feb 1975 | A |
3928884 | Sutter | Dec 1975 | A |
4020526 | Johansson | May 1977 | A |
4084283 | Rosendall | Apr 1978 | A |
4171554 | Tschudy | Oct 1979 | A |
4173054 | Ando | Nov 1979 | A |
4193710 | Pietrowski | Mar 1980 | A |
4209872 | Maier | Jul 1980 | A |
4317253 | Gut | Mar 1982 | A |
4352221 | Revells | Oct 1982 | A |
4370690 | Baker | Jan 1983 | A |
4370777 | Woerwag | Feb 1983 | A |
4372004 | Vermillion | Feb 1983 | A |
4373228 | Dyson | Feb 1983 | A |
4398231 | Currence | Aug 1983 | A |
4426751 | Nordeen | Jan 1984 | A |
4573235 | Baird, Sr. | Mar 1986 | A |
4654924 | Getz | Apr 1987 | A |
4702122 | Richard | Oct 1987 | A |
4802254 | Lahndorff | Feb 1989 | A |
4847944 | Lackner | Jul 1989 | A |
4875246 | MacGregor | Oct 1989 | A |
4920605 | Takashima | May 1990 | A |
4953253 | Fukuda | Sep 1990 | A |
4989293 | Bashyam | Feb 1991 | A |
5075922 | Tsuchida | Dec 1991 | A |
5115538 | Cochran | May 1992 | A |
5121592 | Jertson | Jun 1992 | A |
5203047 | Lynn | Apr 1993 | A |
5243732 | Koharagi | Sep 1993 | A |
5287581 | Lo | Feb 1994 | A |
5394588 | Kweon | Mar 1995 | A |
5452490 | Brundula | Sep 1995 | A |
5482562 | Abernathy | Jan 1996 | A |
5657503 | Caruso | Aug 1997 | A |
5657504 | Khoury | Aug 1997 | A |
5698957 | Sowada | Dec 1997 | A |
5974975 | Seefried | Nov 1999 | A |
6042656 | Knutson | Mar 2000 | A |
6123779 | Conrad | Sep 2000 | A |
6131238 | Weber | Oct 2000 | A |
6170119 | Conrad | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6253414 | Bradd | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6266838 | Caruso | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6282749 | Tajima | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6286180 | Kasper | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6289552 | McCormick | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6351872 | McCormick | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6367120 | Beauchamp | Apr 2002 | B2 |
6502277 | Petersson | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6539575 | Cohen | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6539577 | Okuda | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6605156 | Clark | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6810559 | Mertes | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6883201 | Jones | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6892420 | Haan | May 2005 | B1 |
7143461 | Spooner | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7159276 | Omoto | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7163568 | Sepke | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7171723 | Kobayashi | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7228593 | Conrad | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7237298 | Reindle | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7243393 | Matusz | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7293326 | Hawkins | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7627927 | Blocker | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7631392 | Meitz | Dec 2009 | B1 |
7731618 | Burlington | Jun 2010 | B2 |
8087117 | Kapoor | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8418303 | Kapoor | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8567009 | Krebs | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8601643 | Eriksson | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8671515 | Eriksson | Mar 2014 | B2 |
9072416 | Kowalski | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9186030 | Jung | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9314140 | Eriksson | Apr 2016 | B2 |
20020007528 | Beauchamp | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20040172769 | Giddings | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040181888 | Tawara | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040244140 | Joo | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050015916 | Orubor | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050015922 | Lim | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050091788 | Forsberg | May 2005 | A1 |
20060000053 | Lim | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060037170 | Shimizu | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060162121 | Naito | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060272122 | Butler | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060288517 | Oh | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070079474 | Min | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20080052846 | Kapoor | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080289141 | Oh | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090000057 | Yoo | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090100636 | Sohn | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090229075 | Eriksson | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20100107359 | Yoo | May 2010 | A1 |
20100205768 | Oh | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100287717 | Jang | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100313912 | Han et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110035900 | Chae | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20120013907 | Jung | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120124769 | Krebs | May 2012 | A1 |
20130007982 | Yun | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130008469 | Yun | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130042429 | Misumi | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130055522 | Hawkins | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130192021 | Eriksson | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130192022 | Eriksson | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130192023 | Eriksson | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130192024 | Eriksson | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130198995 | Eriksson | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20140259521 | Kowalski | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140304941 | Eriksson | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140331446 | Eriksson | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140352104 | Eriksson | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140359968 | Eriksson | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140366300 | Eriksson | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20160015233 | Uphoff | Jan 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2466000 | May 2003 | CA |
1457742 | Nov 2003 | CN |
1593320 | Mar 2005 | CN |
2746989 | Dec 2005 | CN |
1816300 | Aug 2006 | CN |
1816301 | Sep 2006 | CN |
1883354 | Dec 2006 | CN |
101310666 | Nov 2008 | CN |
101686783 | Mar 2010 | CN |
101984742 | Mar 2011 | CN |
102334943 | Feb 2012 | CN |
102462450 | May 2012 | CN |
102010017211 | Dec 2011 | DE |
102010017258 | Dec 2011 | DE |
0649625 | Sep 1994 | EP |
1415583 | May 2004 | EP |
1442693 | Aug 2004 | EP |
1642520 | Apr 2006 | EP |
1994869 | Nov 2008 | EP |
2253258 | Nov 2010 | EP |
2273906 | Jan 2011 | EP |
2543301 | Jan 2013 | EP |
1068296 | Jun 1954 | FR |
2855742 | Dec 2004 | FR |
2000963 | Jun 1978 | GB |
2231778 | Nov 1990 | GB |
4944560 | Apr 1974 | JP |
50114057 | Sep 1975 | JP |
61062426 | Mar 1986 | JP |
05095868 | Apr 1993 | JP |
05103740 | Apr 1993 | JP |
405095868 | Apr 1993 | JP |
405305044 | Nov 1993 | JP |
0686743 | Mar 1994 | JP |
06086743 | Mar 1994 | JP |
0856877 | Mar 1996 | JP |
08056877 | Mar 1996 | JP |
08289862 | Nov 1996 | JP |
2002165731 | Jun 2002 | JP |
2003047577 | Feb 2003 | JP |
2003125991 | May 2003 | JP |
2005160578 | Jun 2005 | JP |
2005211426 | Aug 2005 | JP |
2008000382 | Jan 2008 | JP |
2008188319 | Aug 2008 | JP |
2008278947 | Nov 2008 | JP |
2009022644 | Feb 2009 | JP |
WO9210967 | Jul 1992 | WO |
2008099583 | Aug 2008 | WO |
2009117383 | Sep 2009 | WO |
WO 2009117383 | Sep 2009 | WO |
2010041184 | Apr 2010 | WO |
2013060365 | May 2013 | WO |
2013060880 | May 2013 | WO |
2013113395 | Aug 2013 | WO |
2014094869 | Jun 2014 | WO |
2014177216 | Nov 2014 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report for PCT International Application No. PCT/EP2011/068743 dated Jun. 14, 2012. |
International Search Report for PCT International Application No. PCT/EP2012/051773 dated Sep. 17, 2012. |
International Search Report for PCT International Application No. PCT/EP2012/071319 dated Dec. 11, 2012. |
Office Action (with English translation)for Chinese Patent Application No. 200980110915.5 dated Feb. 4, 2013. |
Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT International Application No. PCT/US2009/037348 dated May 14, 2009. |
Supplemental European Search Report for International Application No. EP09721677 dated Oct. 30, 2012. |
Entire patent prosecution history of U.S. Appl. No. 14/374,119, filed Aug. 25, 2014, entitled, “Cleaning Arrangement for a Nozzle of a Vacuum Cleaner.” |
Entire patent prosecution history of U.S. Appl. No. 12/405,761, filed Mar. 17, 2009, entitled, “Agitator With Cleaning Features,” now U.S. Pat. No. 8,601,643, issued Dec. 10, 2013. |
Entire patent prosecution history of U.S. Appl. No. 13/826,400, filed Mar. 14, 2013, entitled, “Brushroll Cleaning Feature With Resilient Linkage to Regulate User-Applied Force,” now U.S. Pat. No. 8,671,515, issued Mar. 18, 2014. |
Entire patent prosecution history of U.S. Appl. No. 13/826,630, filed Mar. 14, 2013, entitled, “Brushroll Cleaning Feature With Spaced Brushes and Friction Surfaces to Prevent Contact.” |
Entire patent prosecution history of U.S. Appl. No. 13/826,855, filed Mar. 14, 2013, entitled, “Brushroll Cleaning Feature With Overload Protection During Cleaning.” |
Entire patent prosecution history of U.S. Appl. No. 13/826,934, filed Mar. 14, 2013, entitled, “Automated Brushroll Cleaning.” |
Entire patent prosecution history of U.S. Appl. No. 13/835,691, filed Mar. 15, 2013, entitled, “Vacuum Cleaner Agitator Cleaner With Power Control.” |
Entire patent prosecution history of U.S. Appl. No. 13/838,035, filed Mar. 15, 2013, entitled, “Vacuum Cleaner Agitator Cleaner With Brushroll Lifting Mechanism.” |
Entire patent prosecution history of U.S. Appl. No. 14/354,449, filed Apr. 25, 2014, entitled, “Cleaning Nozzle for a Vacuum Cleaner.” |
Entire patent prosecution history of U.S. Appl. No. 14/354,460, filed Jun. 19, 2014, entitled, “Cleaning Nozzle for a Vacuum Cleaner.” |
Entire patent prosecution history of U.S. Appl. No. 14/462,956, filed Aug. 19, 2014, entitled, “Vacuum Cleaner Brushroll Cleaner Configuration.” |
Entire patent prosecution history of U.S. Appl. No. 14/467,697, filed Aug. 25, 2014, entitled, “Actuator Mechanism for a Brushroll Cleaner.” |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/IB2014/001050, dated Oct. 28, 2014. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/IB2014/001256, dated Oct. 28, 2014. |
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/EP2012/076620 dated Jul. 23, 2013. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Apr. 16, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/354,460. |
Notice of Allowance dated Apr. 24, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/838,035. |
Entire patent prosecution history of U.S. Appl. No. 14/702,034, filed May 1, 2015, entitled, “Cleaning Nozzle for a Vacuum Cleaner.” |
Entire patent prosecution history of U.S. Appl. No. 14/651,059, filed Jun. 10, 2015, entitled, “Cleaning Arrangement for a Rotatable Member of a Vacuum Cleaner, Cleaner Nozzle, Vacuum Cleaner and Cleaning Unit.” |
Office Action dated May 20, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/835,691. |
Entire patent prosecution history of U.S. Appl. No. 14/730,833, filed Jun. 4, 2015, entitled, “Vacuum Cleaner Agitator Cleaner With Agitator Lifting Mechanism.” |
Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 24, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/826,855. |
Office Action dated Jul. 7, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/826,934. |
International Search Report for PCT International Application No. PCT/EP2012/071318 dated Jan. 3, 2013. |
Notice of Allowance dated Dec. 23, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/354,460. |
Notice of Allowance dated Dec. 31, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/826,630. |
Notice of Allowance dated Dec. 15, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/835,691. |
Final Office Action dated Nov. 30, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/826,934. |
International Search Report dated Dec. 10, 2013 for International Application No. PCT/EP2013/059148. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/IB2015/001873, dated Feb. 4, 2016. |
Notice of Allowance dated Feb. 11, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/826,934. |
Japanese Office Action dated Dec. 15, 2015 for Japanese Application No. 2014-555092 with translation. |
Chinese Office Action dated Nov. 27, 2015 for Chinese Application No. 201280068532.8 with translation. |
Chinese Office Action dated Feb. 29, 2016 for Chinese Application No. 201310485330.X with translation. (pp. 1-9). |
Non Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/730,833, dated May 19, 2016. (pp. 1-31). |
Chinese Office Action dated Apr. 1, 2016 for Chinese Application No. 201280076273.3 with translation. (pp. 1-17). |
Chinese Office Action for Chinese Application No. 201310485447.8, dated Feb. 14, 2015 with translation. (pp. 1-5). |
Non Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/354,449, dated Aug. 11, 2016, 45 pages. |
Japanese Office Action for Japanese Application No. 2014-537645, dated Jun. 14, 2016 with translation, 5 pages. |
Japanese Office Action for Japanese Application No. 2014-555092, dated May 24, 2016 with translation, 5 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/354,449, dated Nov. 30, 2016, 10 pages. |
Non Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/888,275, dated Dec. 2, 2016, 24 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/730,833, dated Dec. 2, 2016, 14 pages. |
Japanese Office Action for Japanese Application No. 2015548227, dated Oct. 14, 2016, 5 pages. |
Chinese Office Action for Application No. 201280058003.X, dated Oct. 9, 2016, 18 pages. |
Chinese Office Action dated Jul. 1, 2015 for Chinese Application No. 201310485330.X, including English language translation. |
Chinese Office Action dated Jul. 14, 2015 for Chinese Application No. 201310479507.5, including English language translation. |
Chinese Office Action dated Jul. 3, 2015 for Chinese Application No. 201310485943.3, including English language translation. |
Chinese Office Action dated Jun. 30, 2015 for Chinese Application No. 201310485447.8, including English language translation. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/IB2014/001050 dated Sep. 15, 2015. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/IB2014/001256 dated Sep. 15, 2015. |
Notice of Allowance dated Sep. 10, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/826,630. |
Notice of Allowance dated Oct. 9, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/354,460. |
Notice of Allowance dated Oct. 16, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/835,691. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/IB2015/001873, dated Febraury 28, 2017, 3 pages. |
Non Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/467,697, dated Feb. 13, 2017, 17 pages. |
Non Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/462,956, dated Feb. 22, 2017, 13 pages. |
Chinese Office Action for Application No. 201280058003.X, dated Apr. 6, 2017 with translation, 17 pages. |
Korean Office Action for Korean Application No. 10-2014-7013892, dated Jun. 30, 2017 with translation, 16 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/354,449, dated Augsut 11, 2017, 9 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/462,956, dated Jul. 19, 2017, 10 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/467,697, dated Jun. 30, 2017, 11 pages. |
Non Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/374,119, dated Jun. 27, 2017, 8 pages. |
Non Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/651,059, dated Jul. 17, 2017, 8 pages. |
Non Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/702,034, dated Oct. 16, 2017, 11 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140331446 A1 | Nov 2014 | US |