Patent Application
20210017475
The present invention relates to a cleaning product comprising an inverted container assembly and a liquid hand dishwashing cleaning composition having a specific surfactant system and an external structurant to substantially reduce/prevent undesirable liquid leakage caused by internal pressure build-up when the product is exposed to increased temperature.
Inverted containers are containers that include an opening at the “bottom” for dispensing the liquid detergent contained inside. The use of inverted containers to package consumer goods has become more popular, particularly in the field of liquid hand dishwashing cleaning products. Consumers prefer inverted containers because they are ergonomically easy to operate. Furthermore an inverted container also facilitates dosing till the last drop, which is more challenging with a traditional upright container having the opening at the “top”. An additional benefit of inverted container is minimized risk of perfume and/or solvent evaporation when left open, thereby positively impacting physical stability and/or perfume longevity accordingly.
A particular challenge for inverted containers is leakage prevention, especially when the inverted container does not comprise a closing cap, such as a flip-top cap or screw on cap, in addition to any dispensing valve at the opening.
The absence of such closing caps is preferred by consumers in order to keep the dosing operation a single-handed operation as no need to open/close the cap with a second hand, as well as speeding up the dosing operation since less steps are needed. There is a tendency for the liquid housed inside the inverted container to leak out during steady state (i.e., storage) and/or upon impact, especially upon impact. For example, leakage may occur during storage when the inverted container is subjected to a temperature change, specifically increase (e.g., inverted container placed beside sunny window or near stove top, etc.), that can lead to internal pressure increases and leakage. Specifically, by “impact” it is meant that when the inverted container is handled, transported, dropped or knocked over. As a result of the impact, transient liquid pressure, also referred to as hydraulic hammer pressure, increases inside the inverted container and can cause leakage through the opening at the bottom.
Previous attempts to address the leakage problem have involved incorporating a resilient valve into the opening (see for example WO2004/02843 (Method Products)). However, it has been observed that even with the resilient valve leakage to some degree may still occur. Other attempts have incorporated baffles on top of the resilient valve (see for example JP2007/176594 (Lion) and WO2000/6038 (Aptar Group)), which have not completely resolved the leakage issue particularly as it pertains to inverted containers, more particularly upon impact. Yet other attempts have involved incorporating a flowable viscous (at least 500 Pa·s) laundry composition inside a compressible inverted container with a cap that functions as supportive base (see W2009/156317 (Unilever)). None of these solutions fully addresses the problems discussed above.
EP3511402A and EP3511405A describe a surfactant system based on an anionic surfactant system in combination with an amphoteric or zwitterionic based co-surfactant system, as well as products comprising an appropriate Trouton ratio, to provide a substantial improvement in leakage prevention upon a hydraulic hammer pressure impact, as well reducing stringiness. EP3492400A describes a liquid dispenser for dispensing liquid from an inverted container. The dispenser includes a body adapted for releasably engaging to the inventor container, a valve localized in the body and defining a dispensing orifice that reacts to pressure differences for dispensing liquid to the exterior atmosphere, and an impact resistance system. The impact resistance system is located upstream of the valve and comprises a housing that includes a cavity adapted to be occupied by a compressible substance. The compressible substance allows pressure equilibration between the valve interior side and the valve exterior side allowing the dispensing orifice to be reactably closeable, especially to absorb a hydraulic hammer pressure from an impact force.
EP2757145A relates to a liquid detergent comprising from about 5% to about 20% by weight thereof of a surfactant system wherein the surfactant system comprises an alkoxylated anionic surfactant having and alkoxylation degree of from 0.20 to 1.75 and wherein the detergent at 20° C. has a pouring viscosity of from about 2500 mPa s to about 6000 mPa s and a ratio of medium to high shear viscosity of from about 2 to about 1. EP2757143A relates to a liquid detergent comprising from about 5% to about 20% by weight thereof of a surfactant system wherein the surfactant system comprises an anionic and an amphoteric surfactant comprising an amine oxide surfactant wherein the anionic and amphoteric surfactants are in a weight ratio of from about 1:1 to about 8.5:1 and wherein the detergent at 20° C. has a pouring viscosity of from about 2500 mPa s to about 6000 mPa s and a ratio of medium to high shear viscosity of from about 2 to about 1.
It has been found however that a temperature increase (e.g., inverted container placed beside sunny window or near stove top, etc.), can lead to internal pressure increases, which can still lead to some leakage. The leakage risk is especially present as the product level in the bottle decreases with usage. Without wishing to be bound by theory it is believed that as the air space increases in the container with usage and is heated upon storage, that the internal pressure within the inverted container increases and the resultant expansion pushes the liquid detergent through the valve of the dosing container. Thus, the need remains for an improved cleaning product comprising an inverted container assembly and a liquid hand dishwashing cleaning composition contained therein, especially in view of leakage prevention upon static storage at elevated temperature.
The present invention relates to a cleaning product as described in claim 1. Such cleaning products have surprisingly been found to lead to a reduction or even an elimination of static leakage when the product is left at an elevated temperature.
While the specification concludes with claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the invention, it is believed that the invention will be better understood from the following description of the accompanying figures wherein like numerals are employed to designate like parts throughout the same:
As used herein, articles such as “a” and “an” when used in a claim, are understood to mean one or more of what is claimed or described.
As used herein, any of the terms “comprising”, “having”, “containing”, and “including” means that other steps, ingredients, elements, etc. which do not adversely affect the end result can be added. Each of these terms encompasses the terms “consisting of” and “consisting essentially of”. Unless otherwise specifically stated, the elements and/or equipment herein are believed to be widely available from multiple suppliers and sources around the world.
As used herein, the term “compressible” means the ability of a substance to reduce volume under influence of increased pressure, in which the volume reduction is at least 1%, preferably at least 5%, most preferably at least 10%.
As used herein, the term “consumers” is meant to include the customers who purchase the product as well as the person who uses the cleaning product.
As used herein, the term “hydraulic hammer pressure” means a transient pressure increase caused when the liquid inside the inverted container (11) is forced to stop or change direction suddenly (i.e., momentum change) typically as a result of impact to the inverted container (11). Hydraulic hammer pressure can also be referred to as “impact force”. If the hydraulic hammer pressure is not somehow absorbed by the liquid dispenser (15), then the force might (momentarily) open the valve and cause leakage of the liquid.
The terms “include”, “includes” and “including” are meant to be non-limiting.
As used herein, the term “steady state” or “static” means the constant pressure properties of the liquid inside the inverted container (11) when it is at rest.
It is understood that the test methods that are disclosed in the Test Methods Section of the present application must be used to determine the respective values of the parameters of Applicants' inventions as described and claimed herein.
In all embodiments of the present invention, all percentages are by weight of the total composition, as evident by the context, unless specifically stated otherwise. All ratios are weight ratios, unless specifically stated otherwise, and all measurements are made at 25° C., unless otherwise designated.
The Applicants have surprisingly discovered an improved cleaning product comprising an inverted container assembly (10) and a liquid dishwashing cleaning composition to provide substantially improved leakage reduction/prevention under static storage when the inverted container is subjected to elevated temperatures, especially as the remaining fill level decreases throughout usage. Essentially, the solution is to formulate the cleaning composition having an external structurant and a specific surfactant system comprising an anionic surfactant and a primary co-surfactant system, preferably an amphoteric surfactant, more preferably an amine oxide surfactant, and wherein the anionic surfactant and the primary co-surfactant system is in a weight ratio of from 8:1 to 1:1, preferably 4:1 to 2:1, more preferably from 3.5:1 to 2.5:1. In fact, the inventors have discovered that this specific surfactant system enables the cleaning composition to have a lower viscosity profile (i.e., ≤10,000 mPa·s), which substantially reduces/prevents leakage upon impact of the inverted container (11) and/or stringing of the cleaning composition upon dosing, preferably when the dosing has completed. While not wishing to be bound by theory, it is believed that the specific surfactant system in the cleaning composition herein impacts the elastic properties of the liquid cleaning composition, and enables the composition to have high elasticity at low shear and as such rendering the product less sensitive to leakage upon storage or “hydraulic hammer” impact. The specific surfactant system also enables the composition to have low elasticity upon high shear and as such substantially reduce or prevent liquid stringing, preferably upon dosing, more preferably when dosing has completed. Further addition of the external structurant substantially reduces the remaining leakage upon static storage at elevated temperatures risk, especially at decreased remaining fill levels throughout usage. Without wishing to be bound by theory it is believed the built in structure provides an additional counter-force against the internal pressure build-up and linked expansion force of the air space above the liquid detergent phase within the inverted container.
For ease of description, the cleaning product of this invention is described with terms such as upper/top, lower/bottom, horizontal, etc. in reference to the position show in
The cleaning composition of the present invention will comprise a specific surfactant system to provide improved leakage upon impact and/or stringing prevention while also enabling lower product viscosity profile. The cleaning composition will further comprise an external structurant which will further provide improved leakage prevention under static storage conditions, especially when the inverted container is exposed to increased storage temperatures and as the liquid fill level decreases throughout usage. The external structurant will be described in more detail herein. The composition comprises from 1% to 60%, preferably from 5% to 50%, more preferably from 8% to 45%, most preferably from 15% to 40%, by weight of the total composition of a surfactant system. The surfactant system comprises an anionic surfactant and a primary co-surfactant in a weight ratio of from 8:1 to 1:1, preferably 4:1 to 2:1, more preferably from 3.5:1 to 2.5:1.
Preferably, the pH of the cleaning composition is from 5 to 12, more preferably from 7.5 to 10, as measured at 10% dilution in distilled water at 20° C. The pH of the composition can be adjusted using pH modifying ingredients known in the art.
The composition of the present invention can be Newtonian or non-Newtonian, preferably non-Newtonian. Preferably, the composition has a shear viscosity of 10 mPa·s to 10,000 mPa·s, preferably from 100 mPa·s to 5,000 mPa·s, more preferably from 300 mPa·s to 3,000 mPa·s, most preferably from 500 mPa·s to 2,000 mPa·s, at a shear rate of 10/s as measured according to the Shear Viscosity Test Method as described herein at 20° C. Without wishing to be bound by theory the shear viscosity at 10/s is believed to best describe consumer product experience upon usage.
Preferably, the composition has a density between 0.5 g/mL and 2 g/mL, more preferably between 0.8 g/mL and 1.5 g/mL, most preferably between 1 g/mL and 1.2 g/mL.
The cleaning composition of the invention is especially suitable for use as a hand dishwashing detergent. It is extremely suitable for use in diluted form in a full sink of water to wash dishes. It can also be used when dosed directly on soiled dishware or on an optionally pre-wetted cleaning implement, preferably a sponge.
Preferably, the surfactant system for the cleaning composition of the present invention comprises from 60% to 90%, preferably from 65% to 85%, more preferably from 70% to 80%, by weight of the surfactant system of an anionic surfactant. The anionic surfactant can be any anionic cleaning surfactant, preferably selected from sulphate and/or sulfonate and/or sulfosuccinate anionic surfactants. Especially preferred anionic surfactant is selected from the group consisting of an alkyl sulfate, an alkyl alkoxy sulfate, and mixtures thereof. Preferred anionic surfactant is an alkyl ethoxy sulfate or a mixed alkyl sulfate—alkyl ethoxy sulfate anionic surfactant system, with a mol average ethoxylation degree of less than 5, preferably less than 3, more preferably less than 2 and more than 0.5.
Preferably the alkyl ethoxy sulfate, or mixed alkyl sulfate—alkyl ethoxy sulfate, anionic surfactant has a weight average level of branching of from 5% to 60%, preferably from 10% to 50%, more preferably from 20% to 40%. This level of branching contributes to better dissolution and suds lasting. It also contributes to the stability of the detergent at low temperature. Preferably the alkyl ethoxy sulfate anionic surfactant, or mixed alkyl sulfate—alkyl ethoxy sulfate anionic surfactant, has an average alkyl carbon chain length of from 8 to 16, preferably from 12 to 15, more preferably from 12 to 14, and preferably a weight average level of branching between 25% and 45%. Detergents having this ratio present good dissolution and suds performance. Beyond controlling alkyl carbon chain length, average ethoxylation degree and average branching will also help control the viscosity of the cleaning composition without the excessive need of organic solvents.
When the alkyl ethoxylated sulfate anionic surfactant is a mixture, the average alkoxylation degree is the mol average alkoxylation degree of all the components of the mixture (i.e., mol average alkoxylation degree). In the mol average alkoxylation degree calculation the weight of sulfate anionic surfactant components not having alkoxylate groups should also be included.
Mol average alkoxylation degree=(x1*alkoxylation degree of surfactant 1+x2*alkoxylation degree of surfactant 2+ . . . )/(x1+x2+ . . . )
wherein x1, x2, . . . are the number of moles of each sulfate anionic surfactant of the mixture and alkoxylation degree is the number of alkoxy groups in each sulfate anionic surfactant.
If the surfactant is branched, the preferred branching group is an alkyl. Typically, the alkyl is selected from methyl, ethyl, propyl, butyl, pentyl, cyclic alkyl groups and mixtures thereof. Single or multiple alkyl branches could be present on the main hydrocarbyl chain of the starting alcohol(s) used to produce the sulfate anionic surfactant used in the composition of the invention.
The branched sulfate anionic surfactant can be a single anionic surfactant or a mixture of anionic surfactants. In the case of a single surfactant the percentage of branching refers to the weight percentage of the hydrocarbyl chains that are branched in the original alcohol from which the surfactant is derived.
In the case of a surfactant mixture the percentage of branching is the weight average and it is defined according to the following formula:
Weight average of branching (%)=[(x1*wt % branched alcohol 1 in alcohol 1+x2*wt % branched alcohol 2 in alcohol 2+ . . . )/(x1+x2+ . . . )]*100
wherein x1, x2, are the weight in grams of each alcohol in the total alcohol mixture of the alcohols which were used as starting material for the anionic surfactant for the detergent of the invention. In the weight average branching degree calculation, the weight of anionic surfactant components not having branched groups should also be included.
Suitable counterions include alkali metal cation, earth alkali metal cation, alkanolammonium or ammonium or substituted ammonium, but preferably sodium.
Suitable examples of commercially available sulfates include, those based on Neodol alcohols ex the Shell company, Lial—Isalchem and Safol© ex the Sasol company, natural alcohols ex The Procter & Gamble Chemicals company. Suitable sulfonate surfactants for use herein include water-soluble salts of C8-C18 alkyl or hydroxyalkyl sulfonates; C11-C18 alkyl benzene sulfonates (LAS), modified alkylbenzene sulfonate (MLAS); methyl ester sulfonate (MES); and alpha-olefin sulfonate (AOS). Those also include the paraffin sulfonates may be monosulfonates and/or disulfonates, obtained by sulfonating paraffins of 10 to 20 carbon atoms. The sulfonate surfactant also includes the alkyl glyceryl sulfonate surfactants.
The surfactant system of the composition of the present invention comprises a primary co-surfactant system. The composition preferably comprises from 0.1% to 20%, more preferably from 0.5% to 15%, and especially from 2% to 10% by weight of the cleaning composition of the primary co-surfactant system. Preferably, the surfactant system for the cleaning composition of the present invention comprises from 10% to 40%, preferably from 15% to 35%, more preferably from 20% to 30%, by weight of the surfactant system of a primary co-surfactant.
As used herein, the term “primary cosurfactant” means the non-anionic surfactant present at the highest level amongst all the cosurfactants co-formulated with the anionic surfactant. Preferably the primary co-surfactant is selected from the group consisting of an amphoteric surfactant, a zwitterionic surfactant, and mixtures thereof.
The composition of the present invention will preferably comprise an amine oxide as the amphoteric surfactant. Preferably, the amine oxide surfactant is selected from the group consisting of a linear or branched alkyl amine oxide surfactant, a linear or branched alkyl amidopropyl amine oxide surfactant, and mixtures thereof, more preferably a linear alkyl dimethyl amine oxide surfactant, even more preferably a linear C10 alkyl dimethyl amine oxide surfactant, a linear C12-C14 alkyl dimethyl amine oxide surfactant, and mixtures thereof, most preferably a linear C12-C14 alkyl dimethyl amine oxide surfactant.
Preferably, the amine oxide surfactant is alkyl dimethyl amine oxide or alkyl amido propyl dimethyl amine oxide, preferably alkyl dimethyl amine oxide and especially coco dimethyl amino oxide, most preferably C12-C14 alkyl dimethyl amine oxide.
Alternatively, the amine oxide surfactant is a mixture of amine oxides comprising a low-cut amine oxide and a mid-cut amine oxide. The amine oxide of the composition of the invention then comprises:
In a preferred low-cut amine oxide for use herein R3 is n-decyl. In another preferred low-cut amine oxide for use herein R1 and R2 are both methyl. In an especially preferred low-cut amine oxide for use herein R1 and R2 are both methyl and R3 is n-decyl.
Preferably, the amine oxide comprises less than 5%, more preferably less than 3%, by weight of the amine oxide of an amine oxide of formula R7R8R9AO wherein R7 and R8 are selected from hydrogen, C1-C4 alkyls and mixtures thereof and wherein R9 is selected from C8 alkyls and mixtures thereof. Compositions comprising R7R8R9AO tend to be unstable and do not provide very suds mileage.
Preferably, the zwitterionic surfactant is a betaine surfactant. Suitable betaine surfactant includes alkyl betaines, alkylamidobetaine, amidazoliniumbetaine, sulfobetaine (INCI Sultaines) as well as the Phosphobetaine and preferably meets Formula (I):
R1—[CO—X(CH2)n]x—N+(R2)(R3)—(CH2)m—[CH(OH)—CH2]y—Y−
wherein
R1 is a saturated or unsaturated C6-22 alkyl residue, preferably C8-18 alkyl residue, in particular a saturated C10-16 alkyl residue, for example a saturated C12-14 alkyl residue;
X is NH, NR4 with C1-4 Alkyl residue R4, O or S,
n is a number from 1 to 10, preferably 2 to 5, in particular 3,
x is 0 or 1, preferably 1,
R2 and R3 are independently a C1-4 alkyl residue, potentially hydroxy substituted such as a hydroxyethyl, preferably a methyl,
m is a number from 1 to 4, in particular 1, 2 or 3,
y is 0 or 1, and
Y is COO, SO3, OPO(OR5)O or P(O)(OR5)O, whereby R5 is a hydrogen atom H or a C1-4 alkyl residue.
Preferred betaines are the alkyl betaines of the Formula (Ia), the alkyl amido propyl betaine of the Formula (Ib), the Sulfo betaines of the Formula (Ic) and the Amido sulfobetaine of the Formula (Id):
R1—N(CH3)2—CH2COO— (Ia)
R1—CO—NH—(CH2)3—N+(CH3)2—CH2COO— (Ib)
R1—N+(CH3)2—CH2CH(OH)CH2SO3— (Ic)
R1—CO—NH—(CH2)3—N+(CH3)2—CH2CH(OH)CH2SO3— (Id)
in which R1 has the same meaning as in Formula (I). Particularly preferred betaines are the Carbobetaine [wherein Y—═COO—], in particular the Carbobetaine of the Formulae (Ia) and (Ib), more preferred are the Alkylamidobetaine of the Formula (Ib).
A preferred betaine is, for example, cocoamidopropylbetaine.
Preferably, the surfactant system of the composition of the present invention comprises a surfactant system wherein the weight ratio of the anionic surfactant to the primary co-surfactant, preferably the anionic surfactant to the amine oxide surfactant is from 8:1 to 1:1, preferably 4:1 to 2:1, more preferably from 3.5:1 to 2.5:1.
Preferably the surfactant system of the composition of the present invention further comprises from 0.1% to 10% by weight of the total composition of a secondary co-surfactant system. As used herein, the term “secondary co-surfactant” means the co-surfactant present at the second highest level asides from the anionic surfactant as the main surfactant, i.e., anionic surfactant present at the highest level and the amphoteric/zwitterionic/mixtures thereof as primary co-surfactant. Preferably the secondary co-surfactant system comprises a non-ionic surfactant. Preferably, the surfactant system of the composition of the present invention further comprises from 1% to 25%, preferably from 1.25% to 20%, more preferably from 1.5% to 15%, most preferably from 1.5% to 5% by weight of the surfactant system, of a non-ionic surfactant.
Preferably, the non-ionic surfactant is a linear or branched, primary or secondary alkyl alkoxylated non-ionic surfactant, preferably an alkyl ethoxylated non-ionic surfactant, preferably comprising on average from 9 to 15, preferably from 10 to 14 carbon atoms in its alkyl chain and on average from 5 to 12, preferably from 6 to 10, most preferably from 7 to 8, units of ethylene oxide per mole of alcohol. Other suitable non-ionic surfactants for use herein include fatty alcohol polyglycol ethers, alkylpolyglucosides and fatty acid glucamides, preferably alkylpolyglucosides. Preferably the alkyl polyglucoside surfactant is a C8-C16 alkyl polyglucoside surfactant, preferably a C8-C14 alkyl polyglucoside surfactant, preferably with an average degree of polymerization of between 0.1 and 3, more preferably between 0.5 and 2.5, even more preferably between 1 and 2. Most preferably the alkyl polyglucoside surfactant has an average alkyl carbon chain length between 10 and 16, preferably between 10 and 14, most preferably between 12 and 14, with an average degree of polymerization of between 0.5 and 2.5 preferably between 1 and 2, most preferably between 1.2 and 1.6. C8-C16 alkyl polyglucosides are commercially available from several suppliers (e.g., Simusol© surfactants from Seppic Corporation; and Glucopon® 600 CSUP, Glucopon® 650 EC, Glucopon® 600 CSUP/MB, and Glucopon® 650 EC/MB, from BASF Corporation). Preferably, the composition comprises the anionic surfactant and the non-ionic surfactant in a ratio of from 2:1 to 50:1, preferably 2:1 to 10:1.
The cleaning composition of the present invention comprises an external structurant. The cleaning composition comprises the external structurant at a level of from 0.001% to 5%, preferably from 0.01% to 2%, most preferably from 0.05% to 1% by weight of the cleaning composition.
The external structurant is selected from the group consisting of micro fibril cellulose, non-polymeric crystalline hydroxyl-containing rheology modifiers selected from the group consisting of hydroxyl-containing fatty acids, fatty esters and hydrogenated castor oil derivatives, naturally derived or synthetic polymeric structurants, or mixtures thereof, more preferably selected from the group consisting of micro fibril cellulose, non-polymeric crystalline hydroxyl-containing rheology modifiers selected from the group consisting of hydroxyl-containing fatty acids, fatty esters and hydrogenated castor oil derivatives, and mixtures thereof, even more preferably the external structurant is a micro fibril cellulose, most preferably micro fibril cellulose derived from wood.
A preferred external structurant is microfibrillated cellulose, as these are known to preserve the transparent/translucent nature of a liquid detergent composition. Microfibrillated cellulose can be derived from different sources, such as from bacterial origin or from botanical origins such as fruits, vegetables, plants and wood, though wood is a preferred source. While microfibrillated cellulose will reduce the static leakage at elevated temperatures, preference goes to microfibrillated cellulose derived from wood as these have been found to recover their viscosity and yield point surprisingly rapidly after shaking. As a result, the leakage prevention is improved even after vigourous shaking.
Suitable wood sources include: spruce, poplar, olive tree, eucalyptus, pinus, robinia, elm, oak, and mixtures thereof, with spruce, eucalyptus, and mixtures thereof being preferred, and spruce being most preferred.
The microfibrillated cellulose is preferably not chemically treated, beyond any hydrolysis treatment to purify the cellulose. For instance, by extracting the pectins and hemicelluloses. Since the wood from which the microfibrillated cellulose is derived is typically low in pectin, such hydrolysis treatment may also not be necessary. As such, more preferred microfibrillated cellulose are not chemically treated. While charged groups can also be introduced into the microfiber cellulose, for instance, via carboxymethylation, as described in Langmuir 24 (3), pages 784 to 795, such chemical modifications are not preferred.
The microfibrillated cellulose can be provided as a structuring premix to allow easier processing into the liquid detergent composition.
Non-polymeric (except for conventional alkoxylation), crystalline hydroxy-functional materials are also suitable external structrurants. These can form thread-like structuring systems throughout the liquid matrix when they are crystallized within the matrix in situ. Such materials can be generally characterized as crystalline, hydroxyl-containing fatty acids, fatty esters or fatty waxes. In a preferred embodiment, the structurant is indeed a crystalline, hydroxyl-containing rheology modifier such as castor oil and its derivatives. Especially preferred are hydrogenated castor oil derivatives such as hydrogenated castor oil and hydrogenated castor wax. Commercially available, castor oil-based, crystalline, hydroxyl-containing rheology modifiers include THIXCIN® from Rheox, Inc. (now Elementis).
Polymeric structurants can also be used. Such structurants typically provide shear-thinning characteristics to the aqueous liquid matrix. Suitable polymeric structurants can be naturally derived and/or synthetic polymeric structurant. Examples of naturally derived polymeric structurants of use in the present invention include: hydroxyethyl cellulose, hydrophobically modified hydroxyethyl cellulose, carboxymethyl cellulose, polysaccharide derivatives and mixtures thereof. Polysaccharide derivatives include but are not limited to pectine, alginate, arabinogalactan (gum Arabic), carrageenan, gum karaya, gum tragacanth, gellan gum, xanthan gum and guar gum. Gellan gum is commercially marketed by CP Kelco U.S., Inc. under the KELCOGEL tradename. Examples of synthetic polymeric structurants include: polycarboxylates, polyacrylates, hydrophobically modified ethoxylated urethanes, hydrophobically modified non-ionic polyols and mixtures thereof. A suitable synthetic rheology modifier is a polyacrylate that is a copolymer of unsaturated mono- or di-carbonic acid and C1-C30 alkyl ester of the (meth)acrylic acid. Such copolymers are available from Lubrizol Corp. under the tradename Carbopol Aqua 30. A further alternative cross-linked polymer is Carbopol Aqua SF-1. An alternative rheology modifier is a partially cross-linked polycarboxylate thickener available from Dow Chemical's under the ACULYN tradename. Another suitable synthetic rheology modifier is cross-linked polyvinylpyrrolidone available under the tradename FlexiThix from ISP. Another class of suitable structurants are those usually referred to as Hydrophobically modified Ethoxylated Urethane (HEUR). These form a class of associative thickeners that are available under the tradename Acusol 880 and Acusol 882 from Dow Chemicals. Another class of suitable structurants are those usually referred to as Alkali Soluble Emulsions (ASE) that thicken via a non-associative swelling mechanism. These rheology modifiers are available from Dow Chemical's under the tradename Acusol 810A, 830, 835, or 842. Another class of suitable structurants are those usually referred to as Hydrophobically modified Alkali Soluble Emulsions (HASE), that thicken via an associative swelling mechanism involving interaction with surfactants when present in the formulation. These rheology modifiers are available from Dow Chemical's under the tradename Acusol 801S, 805S, 820, or 823, or from BASF under the tradename Rheovis AT120.
The composition may further comprise from 0.01% to 5%, preferably from 0.2% to 3%, more preferably from 0.3% to 1% by weight of the total composition of an amphiphilic polymer selected from the groups consisting of amphiphilic alkoxylated polyalkyleneimine and mixtures thereof, preferably an amphiphilic alkoxylated polyalkyleneimine.
A preferred polyethyleneimine has the general structure of Formula (II):
wherein the polyethyleneimine backbone has a weight average molecular weight of 600, n of Formula (II) has an average of 24, m of Formula (II) has an average of 16 and R of Formula (II) is hydrogen. The degree of permanent quaternization of Formula (II) is 0% of the polyethyleneimine backbone nitrogen atoms. The molecular weight of this polyethyleneimine preferably is from 25,000 to 30,000, most preferably 28,000.
These polyethyleneimines can be prepared, for example, by polymerizing ethyleneimine, as described in more detail in PCT Publication No. WO 2007/135645.
The cleaning composition can comprise an alkylene oxide triblock copolymer such as a triblock co-polymer having alkylene oxide moieties according to Formula (I):
(EO)x(PO)y(EO)x (I)
wherein EO represents ethylene oxide, and each x represents the number of EO units within the EO block. Each x is independently on average between 1 and 80, preferably between 3 and 60, more preferably between 5 and 50, most preferably between 5 and 30. Preferably x is the same for both EO blocks, wherein the “same” means that the x between the two EO blocks varies within a maximum 2 units, preferably within a maximum of 1 unit, more preferably both x's are the same number of units. PO represents propylene oxide, and y represents the number of PO units in the PO block. Each y is on average between 1 and 60, preferably between 10 and 55, more preferably between 10 and 50, more preferably between 15 and 48.
The cleaning composition can further comprise cyclic polyamine, for improved grease cleaning. Suitable polyamines comprise amine functionalities that helps cleaning as part of a cleaning composition. The composition of the invention preferably comprises from 0.1% to 10%, more preferably from 0.2% to 5%, and especially from 0.3% to 2%, by weight of the composition, of the cyclic polyamine.
The amine can be a cyclic amine with at least two primary amine functionalities. It has been found that in terms of grease cleaning, better performance is obtained when the primary amines are in positions 1,3. It has also been found that cyclic amines in which one of the substituents is —CH3 and the rest are H provided for improved grease cleaning performance. Accordingly, the most preferred cyclic polyamine for use with the cleaning composition of the present invention are cyclic polyamine selected from the group consisting of 2-methylcyclohexane-1,3-diamine, 4-methylcyclohexane-1,3-diamine and mixtures thereof.
The composition of the present invention may comprise from 0.05% to 2%, preferably from 0.1% to 1.5%, or more preferably from 0.5% to 1%, by weight of the total composition of a salt, preferably a monovalent, divalent inorganic salt or a mixture thereof, more preferably sodium chloride, sodium sulphate or a mixture thereof, most preferably sodium chloride.
The composition of the present invention may comprise from 0.1% to 10%, or preferably from 0.5% to 10%, or more preferably from 1% to 10% by weight of the total composition of a hydrotrope or a mixture thereof, preferably sodium cumene sulfonate.
The composition of the present invention may comprise an organic solvent. Suitable organic solvents include C4-14 ethers and diethers, polyols, glycols, alkoxylated glycols, C6-C16 glycol ethers, alkoxylated aromatic alcohols, aromatic alcohols, aliphatic linear or branched alcohols, alkoxylated aliphatic linear or branched alcohols, alkoxylated C1-C5 alcohols, C8-C14 alkyl and cycloalkyl hydrocarbons and halohydrocarbons, and mixtures thereof. Preferably the organic solvents include alcohols, glycols, and glycol ethers, alternatively alcohols and glycols. The composition can comprise from 0.01% to 25%, more preferably from 0.1% to 10%, or most preferably from 0.5% to 5%, by weight of the total composition of an organic solvent, preferably an alcohol, more preferably ethanol, a polyalkyleneglycol, more preferably polypropyleneglycol, and mixtures thereof.
The cleaning composition herein may optionally comprise a number of other adjunct ingredients such as builders (e.g., preferably citrate), chelants, conditioning polymers, cleaning polymers, surface modifying polymers, soil flocculating polymers, structurants, emollients, humectants, skin rejuvenating actives, enzymes, carboxylic acids, scrubbing particles, bleach and bleach activators, perfumes, malodor control agents, pigments, dyes, opacifiers, beads, pearlescent particles, microcapsules, inorganic cations such as alkaline earth metals such as Ca/Mg-ions, antibacterial agents, preservatives, viscosity adjusters (e.g., salt such as NaCl, and other mono-, di- and trivalent salts) and pH adjusters and buffering means (e.g. carboxylic acids such as citric acid, HCl, NaOH, KOH, alkanolamines, phosphoric and sulfonic acids, carbonates such as sodium carbonates, bicarbonates, sesquicarbonates, borates, silicates, phosphates, imidazole and alike).
The inverted container assembly (10) comprises an inverted container (11) and a liquid dispenser (15) attached to the bottom surface (12) of the inverted container (11).
As shown in
With reference to
Alternatively, the connecting sleeve (17) may be adapted for engaging, preferably releasably engaging, to an interior surface proximate an opening (14) of the inverted container (11). In other words, the inverted container (11) is attached to the connecting sleeve (17) located on the horizontal exterior of the body (16) of the liquid dispenser (15). However this alternative arrangement is less preferred since there is a higher leakage risk of liquid passing through the contacts between the dispenser (15) and the inverted container (11).
The body (16) can be engaged, preferably releasably engaged, to the opening (14) of the inverted container (11) by suitable means of attachment commonly known to those skilled in the art, including for non-limiting example co-operative threads, crimping, clipping means, clasp-means, snap-fit means, groove arrangements, bayonet fittings, or permanently welded. Preferably, the male thread on the exterior surface of the opening (14) of the inverted container (11) is screwed on the female thread which has been molded onto the connecting sleeve (17) (as illustrated in
The body (16) includes a central portion (15) axially disposed along the longitudinal axis (L). The connecting sleeve (17) is preferably spaced radially inwardly towards the central portion (15) and defines an internal discharge conduit (18). This discharge conduit (18) functions as a flow passage for establishing fluid communication with the liquid contained in the inverted container (11) to the exterior atmosphere. It will be understood that in use, the connecting sleeve (17) forms a fluid seal between the liquid dispenser (15) and the inverted container (11) contained in the inverted container (11) so that the cleaning composition can enter the liquid dispenser (15) without leaking.
Preferably, the body (16) comprises at a bottom end (B) an exterior portion (14) adapted to allow the inverted container (11) to stably rest on its bottom on a flat surface (as shown in
It should be understood that while the body (16) has been shown and described herein, there are many variations that may be desirable depending on the particular requirements. For example, while the connecting sleeve (17) and the exterior portion (14) have been shown as having uniform material thickness, in some applications it may be desirable for the material thickness to vary. By way of further example, while a number of surfaces have been described herein as having a specific shape (e.g., frustoconcial, planar, etc.) other specific shapes may be desirable for those surfaces depending upon the particular application.
Preferably, the liquid dispenser (15) further comprises a valve (19) localized in the body (16) extending across the internal discharge conduit (18). As shown by
The valve (19) is preferably a flexible, elastomeric, resilient, 2-way bi-directional, self-closing, slit-type valve mounted in the body (16). The valve (19) has slit of slits (25) which define the dispensing orifice (23). For example, the dispensing orifice (23) may be formed from one slit (25) or two or more intersecting slits (25), that may open to permit dispensing of liquid therethrough in response to an increased pressure inside the inverted container (11), such as for example, when the inverted container (11) is squeezed.
The valve (19) is typically designed so as to reactably close the dispensing orifice (23) and stop the flow of liquid therethrough upon a reduction of the pressure differential across the valve (19). The amount of pressure needed to keep the valve (19) in the closed position will partially depend on the internal resistance force of the valve (19). The “internal resistance force” (i.e., cracking-pressure) refers to a pre-determined resistance threshold to deformation/opening of the valve (19). In other words, the valve (20) will not tend to resist deformation/opening so that it remains closed under pressure of the steady state liquid bearing against the interior side (20) of the valve (19). The amount of pressure needed to deform/open the valve must overcome this internal resistance force. This internal resistance force must not be too low so as to cause liquid leakage or too high to make dispensing a dose of liquid difficult. Accordingly, the valve (19) preferably has an internal resistance force of the valve (19) that is at least 10 mbar, preferably at least 25 mbar, more preferably less than 250 mbar, even more preferably less than 150 mbar, most preferably less than 75 mbar. Preferably, the dispensing orifice (23) is designed to be in the open position when a pressure difference (A) of at least 10 mbar, preferably at least 25 mbar exists between the valve interior side (20) in relation to the valve on the exterior side (21). Preferably the force exerted on the valve interior side (20) that is required in order to open the dispensing orifice (23) is at least 10 mbar, preferably at least 25 mbar. Preferably the valve (10) has a surface area of between 0.1 cm2 and 10 cm2, more preferably between 0.3 cm2 and 5 cm2, most preferably between 0.5 cm2 and 2 cm2. Preferably the valve (19) has a height of between 1 mm and 10 mm, more preferably between 2 mm and 5 mm. Other dimensions could be used so long as they allow for the dispensing orifice (23) to remain in the fully closed position at rest.
As shown in
With continued reference to
Preferably the valve (19) is not contacting the surface on which the inverted container (11) is standing when at rest, nor contacting the surface to be cleaned upon dosing. Heretofore the valve (19) is augmented into the body (16), preferably being positioned at least 1 mm from the resting surface, more preferably at least 5 mm, even more preferably at least 1 cm. By positioning the valve (19) above rather than in contact with the surface there is less risk of capillary seeping through the valve (19) leading to surface contamination and potentially surface damage upon storage of the inverted container (11).
The valve (19) is preferably molded as a unitary structure from materials which are flexible, pliable, elastic and resilient. Suitable materials include, such as for example, thermosetting polymers, including silicone rubber (available as D.C. 99-595-HC from Dow Corning Corp., USA; WACKER 3003-40 Silicone Rubber Material from Wacker Silicone Co.) preferably having a hardness ration of 40 Shore A, linear low-density polyethylene (LLDPE), low density polyethylene (LDPE), LLDPE/LDPE blends, acetate, acetal, ultra-high-molecular weight polyethylene (UHMW), polyester, urethane, ethylene-vinyl-acetate (EVA), polypropylene, high density polyethylene or thermoplastic elastomer (TPE). The valve (19) can also be formed from other materials such as thermoplastic propylene, ethylene and styrene, including their halogenated counterparts. Suitable valves are commercially available such as from the APTAR Company including the SimpliSqueeze® valve line up.
The valve (19) is normally in the closed position and can withstand the pressure of the liquid inside the inverted container (11) so that the liquid will not leak out unless the inverted container (11) is squeezed. Unfortunately, the design of the valve (19) limits their effectiveness in preventing liquid leakage from inside the inverted container (11) under all situations, particularly when the inverted container (11) has been impacted causing a substantial transient liquid pressure increase. Accordingly, the Applicants have surprisingly discovered that by incorporating a baffle (23) and/or an impact resistance system (23) into the liquid dispenser (15), they can help to absorb the transient liquid pressure increase after the impact and substantially reduce or prevent liquid leakage from the liquid dispenser (15).
Preferably, the liquid dispenser (15) further comprises a baffle (30). Preferably the baffle (30), if present, is located between the interior side (20) of the valve (19) and an impact resistance system (23) (as described below). As shown in
Preferably, the liquid dispenser (15) further comprises an impact resistance system (23) (as shown in
Furthermore, the housing (24) comprises at least one inlet opening (26a) that provides a flow path for the liquid from the inverted container (11) into the housing (24). Preferably the inlet opening (26a) is an opening between the discharge conduit (18) and the valve (19). The phrase “at least one” inlet opening (26a) means one or more inlet openings (26a) located on the housing (24). For example, it may be desirable to have one larger inlet opening (26a) or multiple smaller inlet openings (26a). It would be expected that the viscosity and density of the liquid contained inside of the inverted container (11) factors into the design of the size, shape and number of the inlet openings (26a). The inlet opening (26a) functions as an opening for providing a liquid flow path to establishing fluid communication with the liquid contained inside the inverted container (11) and the housing (24). As shown in
The housing (24) further comprises at least one outlet opening (26b) that provides a path of egress for the liquid from the housing (24) to the exterior atmosphere when the dispensing orifice (23) is opened.
As shown in
Preferably, the compressible substance is selected from a gas, a foam, a soft matter such as for example a sponge or a balloon, other viscoelastic substance (e.g., polysiloxanes), or a piston, preferably a gas, more preferably air. The Applicants have discovered that in order to maintain the reactably closeable state for the dispensing orifice (23) the preferred ratio of the volume of the gas, preferably air, inside the housing (24) at a steady state to the volume of the inverted container (11) is higher than 0.001, preferably between 0.005 and 0.05, more preferably between 0.01 and 0.02. Without wishing to be bound by theory it is believed that a minimum compression threshold is desired to significantly reduce or prevent leakage risk under expected exposure conditions during transport or usage. This minimum compression threshold directly correlates with the volume of liquid that can be stored inside the inverted container (11).
It will be evident that the invention can be used with any type of inverted containers. Preferably, the cleaning product is used with the type of inverted container (11) as depicted in
With continued reference to
For example, larger sized inverted containers (11) can hold larger liquid volumes. When these larger sized inverted containers (11) are impacted, a higher mass of liquid will move upon a hydraulic hammer and as such a higher increased transient liquid force (F=m*a−second law of Newton, with “F” being force, “m” being mass of moving liquid, and “a” being acceleration speed of moving liquid) and hence pressure will be created into the housing (24). As there is a limit towards how much transient pressure can be absorbed per unit of volume of compressible substance, when exceeding that threshold the remaining transient pressure will get translated onto the valve (19), causing leakage accordingly. As such a higher volume of compressible substance is required for higher volumes of liquid into the inverted container (11) to have enough impact resistance buffer to prevent leakage upon an eventual hydraulic hammer exposure.
The purpose of the Static Leakage Resistance Test is to assess the leakage of a liquid from an inverted container when stored at elevated temperature. The inverted container having a defined volume (in this case, 400 mL) is filled with the liquid detergent composition to be tested to a defined fill level (in this case, 50 g) within the inverted container. The liquid fill level and the inverted container type including dispenser system and liquid volume are kept the same for cross-comparing the leakage using the different formulations. Assemble the liquid dispenser (here: comprising a valve (Simplicity 21-200 “Simplisqueeze®” valve available from Aptar Group, Inc.), a baffle system (e.g., diameter 7 mm, 5 ribs emerging from center ball of 4 mm to the outside) and an impact resistance system) with the inverted container (see
The (shear) viscosity of the liquid detergent compositions is measured using a Haake MARS rheometer from ThermoScientific with a 60 mm 1° C. one, and truncation gap of 52 micrometer. After sample pre-conditioning (120 seconds at 20° C.), the steady shear is applied to measure the shear viscosity in the range of 0.01-1200 l/s shear-rate at 20° C. 26 data points are taken in a logarithmic distribution. Each data point is taken by waiting for equilibrium with 3% gradient allowed for 0.5 minutes. Maximum waiting time is set for 3 minutes. The shear viscosity at 1/s and at 10/s has been reported.
The ability of a cleaning product to substantially reduce or prevent static liquid leakage upon storage at 40° C. has been assessed for a cleaning composition comprising a surfactant system and an external structurant according to the present invention (Inventive Compositions 1 to 3), added to an inverted container comprising a liquid dispenser comprising a combined silicone valve, a baffle system and an impact resistance system as described in the test method disclosed herein, and cross-compared to a comparative composition outside the scope of the present invention (Comparative Composition 1), single variably lacking the external structurant according to the invention.
The following compositions are produced through standard mixing of the components described in Table 1, except for the addition of the external structurants. For inventive composition 1, the microfibrillated cellulose was added as the last ingredient before homogenizing using an IKA Ultra Turrax mixer at 13,500 rpm for 5 minutes, before centrifuging to remove any air bubbles. For inventive composition 2, the hydrogenated castor oil was added as part of a premix comprising 4% by weight of the castor oil, and 16% by weight of monoethanolamine neutralized HLAS. Since the surfactant in the hydrogenated castor oil premix has negligible influence on the rheology of the composition, it is ignored in the table below. For inventive composition 3, the Rheosolve® 637 structurant was added by simple mixing. The level of the external structurant within the inventive compositions has been selected to match the shear viscosity at 1/s and 20° C. between the 3 different inventive formulations to about 2000 mPas, following the shear viscosity test method described herein.
The results of the Static Leakage Resistance Test are summarized below in Table 2. The results show the amount (g) of leaked liquid composition in absolute and relative (%) to the nil external structurant reference leg.
From the results it can be seen that the liquid compositions comprising the surfactant system and the external structurant according to the invention (Inventive Compositions 1 to 3), have a higher robustness against a static leakage when exposed to an elevated temperature, compared to the Comparative Composition which does not comprise the external structurant (Comparative Composition 1). It can also be seen that crystalline structurants such as micro-fibrillated cellulose (Inventive Composition 1) and hydrogenated castor oil (Inventive Composition 2) are preferred over traditional polymeric rheology modifiers (Inventive Composition 3)
All percentages and ratios herein are calculated by weight unless otherwise indicated. All percentages and ratios are calculated based on the total composition unless otherwise indicated.
It should be understood that every maximum numerical limitation given throughout this specification includes every lower numerical limitation, as if such lower numerical limitations were expressly written herein. Every minimum numerical limitation given throughout this specification will include every higher numerical limitation, as if such higher numerical limitations were expressly written herein. Every numerical range given throughout this specification will include every narrower numerical range that falls within such broader numerical range, as if such narrower numerical.
The dimensions and values disclosed herein are not to be understood as being strictly limited to the exact numerical values recited. Instead, unless otherwise specified, each such dimension is intended to mean both the recited value and a functionally equivalent range surrounding that value. For example, a dimension disclosed as “40 mm” is intended to mean “about 40 mm.”
Every document cited herein, including any cross referenced or related patent or application and any patent application or patent to which this application claims priority or benefit thereof, is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety unless expressly excluded or otherwise limited. The citation of any document is not an admission that it is prior art with respect to any invention disclosed or claimed herein or that it alone, or in any combination with any other reference or references, teaches, suggests or discloses any such invention. Further, to the extent that any meaning or definition of a term in this document conflicts with any meaning or definition of the same term in a document incorporated by reference, the meaning or definition assigned to that term in this document shall govern.
While particular embodiments of the present invention have been illustrated and described, it would be obvious to those skilled in the art that various other changes and modifications can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. It is therefore intended to cover in the appended claims all such changes and modifications that are within the scope of this invention.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19186213.5 | Jul 2019 | EP | regional |
| 20153015.1 | Jan 2020 | EP | regional |
