The present invention concerns solvent-based cleaning compositions of the type used in industrial processes for cleaning a wide variety of items including metals and plastics in the metal-working, electronics and other industries.
Solvent based cleaning compositions are used in industrial processes for cleaning a wide variety of soiling substances and residues (below sometimes referred to as “soils” or “soiling substances”). The electronics industry typically cleans fluxes, solder pastes, adhesives and coatings from a variety of devices before and after assembly of components. Such devices may comprise one or more of a wide range of materials comprising metal, ceramic and synthetic polymer (plastic) substrates and components. Metal working operations must remove lubricant oils and soaps, grinding media and greases from metal surfaces. Many of these soils are very difficult to strip from metal surfaces, especially with non-aqueous cleaners.
Of special interest are non-flammable blends of solvents that provide a cleaning solvent which can be used safely in aerosol packages, or as wiping fluids or in bulk cleaning tanks, for example, in vapor degreasing (“VDG”) units. Typically, these cleaning solvents comprise halogenated compounds that are either non-flammable themselves or can be rendered non-flammable in a mixture with other halogenated compounds. Many solvent-based cleaning compositions rely heavily on the use of additives to target specific applications, that is, to remove specific soiling substances from various objects. A widely used class of additives is phosphate esters, known for use as anionic surfactants. For example, see Phosphate Esters, a technical brochure published by Lakeland Laboratories Limited of Manchester, England (Lakeland Phos. Esters (4), 3/00).
U.S. Pat. No. 4,724,096 to Figiel et al. issued on Feb. 9, 1988 discloses the use trichlorotrifluoroethane with butanol and aryl-ethoxylated phosphate ester acid form for drying formulations.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,856,286 to Nalewajek issued on Jan. 5, 1999 discloses surfactants for use in drying and dry cleaning compositions, in particular, surfactants which may be used with halocarbons including hydrochlorofluorocarbons and hydrofluorocarbons and hydrofluoroethers. As noted at column 1, line 54 et seq., the invention is premised on the discovery that placement of fluorine on the surfactant molecule is critical to surfactant solubility in the halogenated solvent compounds disclosed.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,908,822 to Dishart issued on Jun. 1, 1999 discloses compositions and processes for drying substrates in which the drying and/or cleaning compositions contain surfactants which are primary or secondary amine salts of various perfluoro hydrogen and dihydrogen phosphates.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,053,952 to Kaiser issued on Apr. 25, 2000 discloses a method of dry cleaning using a highly fluorinated organic solvent which contains at least one hydrogen atom per molecule, for example, highly fluorinated hydrocarbons or highly fluorinated ethers. In one embodiment, these compounds are combined with dichloroethylene and a surfactant may be included in the composition. These surfactants may comprise organic alkyl phosphate ester, dialkyl sodium succinate or isopropylamine alkyl benzene sulfonate. The use of phosphate ester salts in dry cleaning is disclosed.
U.S. Pat. No. 8,637,443 to Basu et al. issued on Jan. 28, 2014 discloses a dry cleaning method using a highly fluorinated organic solvent, such as hydrofluorocarbons (HFC) or hydrofluoroethers (HFE). For example, the combination of a fluorinated solvent containing at least one hydrogen atom with transdichloroethylene (“TDE”) and a blend of surfactants including organic alkyl phosphate ester, dialkyl sodium succinates, isopropylamine alkyl benzene sulfonate is disclosed. The latter may be used with other surfactant ingredients in Vertrel® MCA Plus.
Generally, the present invention concerns cleaning solvent compositions whose components exhibit good mutual solvency and highly efficient cleaning. In one aspect, the cleaning solvent compositions of the present invention comprise one or more free acid forms of phosphate ester surfactants, one or more halogenated hydrocarbon solvents, and one or more alcohols.
Specifically, in accordance with the present invention there is provided a composition comprising from about 0.2 to about 15 weight percent of one or more free acid forms of phosphate ester surfactants selected from the group consisting of one or both of:
wherein R is selected from the group consisting of one or more of ethoxylated hydrocarbons, alkylated hydrocarbons, fluorinated hydrocarbons, and ethoxylated and fluorinated hydrocarbons;
from about 2 to about 25 weight percent of an alcohol selected from the group consisting of one or more of straight chain and branched alkyl alcohols, monohydric and polyhydric aromatic alcohols and monohydric and polyhydric heteroaromatic alcohols; and
from about 25 to about 97.8 weight percent of one or more halogenated hydrocarbon solvents.
Another aspect of the present invention provides that R is one or more of
R′ is one or more of H, CH3, an alkyl group and an aryl group; and
n is an integer from 2 to 20, for example, n is an integer from 2 to 5.
In another aspect of the present invention the alcohol is selected from the group consisting of one or more of methanol, ethanol, isopropanol and n-butanol.
Another aspect of the present invention provides that the one or more halogenated hydrocarbon solvents are selected from the group consisting of one or more of perfluorocarbons (“PFCs”), chlorofluorocarbons (“CFCs”), hydrofluorocarbons (“HFCs”), hydrofluoroethers (“HFEs”), hydrofluoroolefins (“HFOs”), partially brominated hydrocarbons, fully brominated hydrocarbons, partially chlorinated hydrocarbons and fully chlorinated hydrocarbons.
Another aspect of the present invention provides a composition comprising from about 0.2 to about 15 weight percent of one or more free acid forms of phosphate ester surfactants selected from the group consisting of:
wherein R is selected from the group consisting of one or more of ethoxylated hydrocarbons, alkylated hydrocarbons, fluorinated hydrocarbons, and ethoxylated and fluorinated hydrocarbons; and
from about 85 to about 97.8 weight percent of a halogenated hydrocarbon solvent.
Yet another aspect of the present invention provides that in the two-component (phosphate ester and halogenated hydrocarbon composition), R is one or more of
R′ is one or more of H, CH3, an alkyl group and an aryl group; and
n is an integer from 2 to 20, for example, n is an integer from 2 to 5.
Another aspect of the present invention provides that in the two-component composition, the halogenated hydrocarbon solvent is selected from the group consisting of one or more of perfluorocarbons (“PFCs”), chlorofluorocarbons (“CFCs”), hydrofluorocarbons (“HFCs”), hydrofluoroethers (“HFEs”), hydrofluoroolefins (“HFOs”), partially brominated hydrocarbons, fully brominated hydrocarbons, partially chlorinated hydrocarbons and fully chlorinated hydrocarbons.
Other aspects of the present invention will be apparent from the following description. For example, the compositions of the invention may include a non-halogenated hydrocarbon solvent.
The following abbreviations, trademarks and trade names have the following meanings, whether used in the singular or plural form.
Solvent Formulations
“TDE”. Trans-Dichloroethylene, Chemical Abstracts Number (“CAS #”) 156-60-5.
“HFCs”. Hydrofluorocarbons such as HFC 43-10me, sold under the trademark Vertrel® XF, CAS #1384-95-42 and HFC365mfc CAS #406-58-6. These materials are available from E.I. DuPont de Nemours and Co. of Wilmington, Del.
“HFEs”. Hydrofluoroethers such as HFE 7100, CAS #163702-08-7 and 163702-07-6.
“NPB”. n-Propyl bromide, CAS #106-94-5.
“Vertrel® SFR”. A blend of 67% trans-dichloroethylene, 18% 2,3-dihydrodecafluoropentane (HFC 43-10me); 12% heptafluorocyclopentane; 3% methanol. This material has a boiling point of 106° F. (41.1° C.) and is available from E.I. DuPont de Nemours and Co. of Wilmington, Del.
“SION”. A blend of 96% trans-dichloroethylene and 4% methylperfluorohexene (HFX-110). This material has a boiling point of 121° F. (49.4° C.) and is available from E.I. DuPont de Nemours and Co. of Wilmington, Del.
“CMS”. A blend of 41.5% trans-dichloroethylene, 18% HFC 365mfc, 37% 2,3-dihydrodecafluoropentane (HFC 43-10me), 3.5% methanol. This material has a boiling point of 97° F. (36.1° C.) and is available from MicroCare Corporation of New Britain, Conn., an affiliated company of the assignee of this application.
“MCA”. A blend of 62% trans-dichloroethylene, 38% 2,3-dihydrodecafluoropentane (HFC 43-10me). This material has a boiling point of 102° F. (38.9° C.) and is available from E.I. DuPont de Nemours and Co. of Wilmington, Del.
“SDG”. A blend of 83% trans-dichloroethylene, 7% 2,3-dihydrodecafluoropentane (HFC 43-10me); 10% hexafluorocyclopentane. Bp 109F. This material has a boiling point of 109° F. (42.8° C.) and is available from E.I. DuPont de Nemours and Co. of Wilmington, Del.
“Vertrel® XP”. A blend of 96.75% 2,3-dihydrodecafluoropentane (HFC 43-10me), 3.25% isopropanol. This material has a boiling point of 126° F. (52.2° C.) and is available from E.I. DuPont de Nemours and Co. of Wilmington, Del.
“CFCs”. Chlorofluorocarbons such as those sold under the trademark Solstice, for example, trans-chlorotrifluoromethyl propene CAS #2730-43-0. This material has a boiling point of 68° F. (20° C.) and is available from Honeywell International of Morristown, N.J.
“DBE”. A blend of dimethyl succinate, glutarate and adipate having a boiling point of >250° F. (121.1° C.) is available from Invista of Wichita, Kans.
Phosphate Esters
“Capstone FS-66”. A fluorinated alkyl substituted phosphate ester in free acid form, available from E.I. DuPont de Nemours and Co. of Wilmington, Del.
“Rhodafac RS710”. An ethoxylated alkyl substituted phosphate ester in free acid form, available from Solvay Rhodia which has a place of business in Houston, Tex.
Soiling Substances
“No-Clean Lead-Free Solder Pastes” available from Alpha Corporation of Altoona, Pa. and Suwanee, Ga. under the designation Omnix 340, or from Nihon Almit Co. Ltd. of Tokyo, Japan under the designation SN62U. Additional fluxes and pastes as are used in the industry are: AIM Corporation 217 Gel Flux, NC Paste Flux (257), NC Flux Pen (280), M8 Paste, RMA258-15R and Loctite Corporation GC3 (Water Soluble), Loctite GC10 and Alpha Corporation OM340 and Indium Corporation 8.9HF1 and SMQ92-J (Leaded).
Standard Procedure.
A stencil was made with 3-mm holes, a 3-mm pitch (edge-to-edge distance between holes) and a 0.075 mm thickness. Flux or solder paste were stencil printed onto 7.62×15.24 mm (3 inch×6 inch) steel panels creating a test array of 3-mm diameter by 0.075 mm high dots of paste. The paste dots were then reflowed by placing the steel plates in a 350° C. oven for 4 minutes or by passing through an Aminstrument T-962A benchtop reflow oven set to achieve 350° C. maximum for 2 minutes. Cleaning trials were conducted in standard 2-sump vapor degreasers or in bench top simulation using beakers of boiling cleaning solvent blend after which the cleaned dots were rinsed in an ambient rinse solution that did not contain phosphate esters. The following examples report the results of cleaning trials conducted pursuant to this Standard Procedure.
In the following Examples 1-6, the types of components (“Component Type”) of each Cleaning Formulation tested is indicated by abbreviations in parentheses. The abbreviations are: “HHC”=halogenated hydrocarbon solvents; “NHH”=non-halogenated hydrocarbon solvents; “ALC”=alcohol; “FAPE”=free acid phosphate ester; and “HFE”=hydrofluoroether solvents. Unless otherwise stated, all references herein to the percentage of a component in a composition are percent by weight of the total weight of the composition.
No-clean Solder Pastes contain organic binders or rosins in which are dispersed the solder and the surface activating components which help bond the solder to a substrate. The results of Example 1 show that especially in lead free, “no clean” systems, the binders can often be removed with existing cleaning formulations but the activators will be left behind leaving a characteristic white residue on the part. Addition of an alcohol to the cleaning composition (trial 5) is seen to help start removal of the ionic white residues but does not adequately clean the part. Trials 6 and 7 dramatically illustrate that the synergy of combining CFC, methanol and a phosphate ester acid successfully removes flux residue. Trials 3 and 4 show the importance of an alcohol component because substituting the strong organic solvent DBE for the methanol did not provide the desired results.
The results of Trials 9 and 11 of Example 2 show that excellent results were obtained without the use of alcohol as a co-solvent for the halogenated solvent component. Trials 13 and 15 show that addition of a phosphate ester acid to a cleaning composition containing alcohol and a halogenated hydrocarbon content will complete the cleaning process as well as achieve significant metal brightening.
Trials 16 and 17 of Example 3 show that SDG and Vertrel® SFR are close in cleaning capabilities. Both have high transdichloroethylene (“TDE”) content that removes organic soils readily. (SDG is 83% TDE and Vertrel® SFR is 67% TDE. However, Trial 16 left behind significant dull gray ionic residues.) The addition of alcohol to the Vertrel® SFR (Trial 17) somewhat improves the removal of ionic residues but still left some residue. However, the addition to Vertrel® SFR of the free acid phosphate ester (Trial 18) enabled attainment of a fully cleaned and brightened part.
Trial 21 of Example 4 shows that the same satisfactory results of Trial 18 of Example 3 are obtained with hydrofluoroethers as the base component of a free acid phosphate ester. The results of Trials 19 and 20 using hydrofluoroethers are comparable to those of Trials 16 and 17 of Example 3.
Trial 24 of Example 5 shows that the same results as obtained in Trial 21 of Example 4 are obtained using brominated solvents as the base component.
Trial 27 of Example 6 illustrates the successful use of an organic solvent instead of TDE (Trans-Dichloroethylene) used in earlier fluorinated systems to remove or soften the rosin portion of the flux. Trial 27 also shows that the addition of alcohol and free acid phosphate ester provided a composition which successfully fully removed no-clean fluxes.
The following examples A-H each describe a range of ingredients and quantities of various cleaning solvent compositions in accordance with aspects of the present invention. Specific compositions used in some of the Trials described above were selected from these examples, the compositions of which are defined in the indicated claims.
The composition of Trial 6 was selected from this example.
The composition of Trial 7 was selected from this example.
The composition of Trials 13 and 18 was selected from this example.
The composition of Trial 15 was selected from this example.
The composition of Trial 21 was selected from this example.
The composition of Trial 24 was selected from this example.
The composition of Trial 27 was selected from this example.
One or more of methanol, ethanol, isopropanol and n-butanol is substituted for the alcohol component of Examples A-G.
While the invention has been described in detail with reference to specific embodiments, it will be appreciated that numerous variations may be made to the described embodiment, which variations nonetheless lie within the scope of the present invention.
This application is a U.S. national stage application of International Application No. PCT/US2016/034569 entitled “Cleaning Solvent Compositions and Their Use”, which has an international filing date of 27 May 2016, and which claims priority of provisional patent application Ser. No. 62/168,306 filed on May 29, 2015 in the name of Wells Cunningham et al. and entitled “Cleaning Solvent Compositions and Their Use”.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2016/034569 | 5/27/2016 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2016/196260 | 12/8/2016 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3776693 | Smith | Dec 1973 | A |
4724096 | Figiel et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
5334325 | Chaussee | Aug 1994 | A |
5856286 | Nalewajek et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5908822 | Dishart | Jun 1999 | A |
6053952 | Kaiser | Apr 2000 | A |
6312759 | Yamada et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6350395 | Kuemin | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6660709 | Dournel | Dec 2003 | B1 |
8410039 | Bartelt et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8637443 | Basu | Jan 2014 | B2 |
20040117918 | Scheper et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040259752 | Degroot et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20060052268 | Artuphel et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060200914 | Evers et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060217277 | Lallier et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20070010421 | Wu | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070203045 | Schweitzer et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20080139444 | Bartelt | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080274935 | Dingess | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090186799 | Owens | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20120122996 | Basu et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20150329806 | Robin et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20160023974 | Bonnet et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160326468 | Robin et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20170283959 | Shellef et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
H 01139863 | Jun 1989 | JP |
2012121749 | Sep 2012 | WO |
2014147311 | Sep 2014 | WO |
Entry |
---|
“Phosphate Esters”, Publication of Lakeland Laboratories Limited, Manchester, England, Ref: Lakeland Phos. Esters (4), 3/00, 12 pages. |
International Search Report for lntemational Application No. PCT/US16/34569; International Filing Date May 27, 2016; dated Aug. 31, 2016; 7 pages. |
Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US16/34569; International Filing Date May 27, 2016; dated Aug. 31, 2016; 8 pages. |
Extended European Search Report dated Oct. 9, 2018, issued in European Patent Application No. 16804100.2, 7 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180216047 A1 | Aug 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62168306 | May 2015 | US |