Patent Grant
11052031
Cationic surfactants can provide antibacterial properties to a cleansing composition. When cationic surfactants are mixed with nonionic surfactants, there is generally a need to use thickeners to increase the viscosity to a level that is expected by consumers for a cleansing composition, such as a liquid hand soap or body wash. While polyacrylate thickeners can increase the viscosity, they can make the cleansing composition opaque or translucent. It would be desirable to provide a cleansing composition containing cationic and nonionic surfactants that is transparent.
An aqueous cleansing composition comprising a cationic surfactant, a nonionic surfactant, and a thickener comprising an alkoxylated methyl glucose ether, wherein a weight ratio of cationic surfactant to nonionic surfactant is greater than 0.9:1.
The combination of the cationionic:nonionic surfactant ratio with the alkoxylated methyl glucose ether thickener provides the composition with cold weather stability. Cold weather stability is observed when the composition remains transparent after cold storage.
Further areas of applicability of the present invention will become apparent from the detailed description provided hereinafter. It should be understood that the detailed description and specific examples, while indicating the preferred embodiment of the invention, are intended for purposes of illustration only and are not intended to limit the scope of the invention.
The following description of the preferred embodiment(s) is merely exemplary in nature and is in no way intended to limit the invention, its application, or uses.
As used throughout, ranges are used as shorthand for describing each and every value that is within the range. Any value within the range can be selected as the terminus of the range. In addition, all references cited herein are hereby incorporated by referenced in their entireties. In the event of a conflict in a definition in the present disclosure and that of a cited reference, the present disclosure controls.
Unless otherwise specified, all percentages and amounts expressed herein and elsewhere in the specification should be understood to refer to percentages by weight. The amounts given are based on the active weight of the material.
For the purpose of calculating a cationic surfactant to nonionic surfactant ratio, cationic surfactant does not include a cationic antibacterial agent selected from the group consisting of benzalkonium chloride, benzethonium chloride, and mixtures thereof. While these materials may function as a cationic surfactant, they are not included in the calculation.
Transparency is defined as the ability to read 12-point font through the composition contained in a 4 oz clear, glass sample bottle of 4 cm thickness. Transparency is measured after 24 hours at 4.5° C.
Viscosity is measured using a Brookfield RVT viscometer with spindle #5 at 25 rpm at 25° C.
The composition includes a cationic surfactant. The cationic surfactant can be any cationic surfactant, but it excludes the cationic bacterial agent for weight ratio calculation. In certain embodiments, the cationic surfactant comprises a quaternary ammonium alkyl salt. The quaternary ammonium alkyl salt can be an alkyltrimethylammonium salts. The salt can be a halide, such as chloride or bromide, or a methosulfate. The alkyl can be a C8-C24 alkyl or a C14-C18 alkyl. In certain embodiments, the cationic surfactant is cetyltrimethylammonium chloride.
In certain embodiments, the cationic surfactant is present in an amount of 0.1 to 20 weight % of the composition. In other embodiments, the amount is 0.1 to 10, 0.1 to 5, 0.5 to 10, 0.5 to 5, 1 to 5, or 2 to 4 weight %.
The composition includes a nonionic surfactant. The nonionic surfactants can be any nonionic surfactant. Nonionic surfactants include, but are not limited to, amine oxides, fatty acid amides, ethoxylated fatty alcohols, block copolymers of polyethylene glycol and polypropylene glycol, glycerol alkyl esters, alkyl polyglucosides, polyoxyethylene glycol octylphenol ethers, sorbitan alkyl esters, polyoxyethylene glycol sorbitan alkyl esters, and mixtures thereof. Examples of amine oxides include, but are not limited to, laurylamidopropyl dimethylamine oxide, myristylamidopropyl dimethylamine oxide, and mixtures thereof. Examples of fatty acid amides include, but are not limited to, cocomonoethanolamide, lauramide monoethanolamide, cocodiethanolamide, and mixtures thereof.
In certain embodiments, the nonionic surfactant is a combination of an amine oxide and a fatty acid amide. In certain embodiments, the amine oxide is a mixture of laurylamidopropyl dimethylamine oxide and myristylamidopropyl dimethylamine oxide. In certain embodiments, the nonionic surfactant is a combination of lauryl/myristylamidopropyl dimethylamine oxide and cocomonoethanolamide.
In certain embodiments, the nonionic surfactant is present in an amount of 0.1 to 20 weight % of the composition. In other embodiments, the amount is 0.1 to 10, 0.1 to 5, 0.5 to 10, 0.5 to 5, or 0.5 to 3 weight %.
The composition has a cationic:nonionic weight ratio greater than 0.9:1. Optionally, the ratio is at least 1:1.
In certain embodiments, the composition does not contain an anionic surfactant.
The composition also includes a thickener comprising an alkoxylated methyl glucose ether. The alkoxylation can be ethoxylated and/or propoxylated. In certain embodiments, it is ethoxylated. The degree of alkoxylation can be any degree that provides thickening. In certain embodiments, the degree of alkoxylation is 100 to 200. In certain embodiments, the alkoxylation is 120 to 150. The alkoxylated methyl glucose ether can be esterified with fatty acid. In certain embodiments, the alkoxylated methyl glucose ether at least one of an alkoxylated methyl glucose dioleate, an alkoxylated methyl glucose trioleate, alkoxylated methyl glucose distearate. In certain embodiments, the alkoxylated methyl glucoside is at least one of PEG-120 methyl glucose dioleate, PEG-120 methyl glucose trioleate, PEG-120 methyl glucose distearate. In certain embodiments, the alkoxylated methyl glucose ether is PEG-120 methyl glucose dioleate.
The thickener can be present in any amount to provide any desired viscosity level. In certain embodiments, the thickener is present in an amount of 0.1 to 2 weight % of the composition. In other embodiments, the amount is 0.1 to 1, 0.2 to 1, 0.3 to 1, 0.4 to 1, 0.1 to 0.9, 0.1 to 0.8, 0.1 to 0.7, 0.3 to 0.8, or 0.4 to 0.8 weight %. In one embodiment, the amount is 0.4 to 0.7 weight %. In certain embodiments, the viscosity is at least 1000 mPas. In other embodiments, the viscosity is at least 2000, at least 3000, or at least 4000 mPas. In certain embodiments, the viscosity is 1000 to 20000, 3000 to 6000, or 3500 to 5000 mPas.
In certain embodiments, the composition does not include a polyacrylate thickener.
The composition can include a cationic antibacterial agent selected from the group consisting of benzalkonium chloride, benzethonium chloride, and mixtures thereof. In certain embodiments, the composition includes benzalkonium chloride. These cationic antibacterial agents can be included in their regulatory amount, which can be 0.13 weight %.
The composition is aqueous. In certain embodiments, water can be included in an amount of 70 to 95 weight % of the composition. In other embodiments, the amount of water is 90 to 95 weight %.
In certain embodiments, the composition can further include salt, such as sodium chloride to assist in increasing viscosity at upper ranges of viscosity. In certain embodiments, the salt is present at 0.1 to 1.2 weight % of the composition. In certain embodiments, the amount is about 0.6 weight %.
The cleansing compositions can be used to cleanse skin by washing skin with the cleansing composition and optionally rinsing with water.
The examples and comparative examples are made by mixing of the materials. The compositions are shown in Tables 1 and 2 below. The examples list the cationic:nonionic surfactant ratio. The viscosity and the transparency after storage at 4.5° C. are measured.
As can be seen in the examples, the combination of the PEG-120 methyl glucose dioleate and the cationic:nonionic surfactant ratio provides a composition that is clear after cold storage and has a desired viscosity over 4000 mPas. When PEG-120 methyl glucose dioleate is present in all compositions, a desired viscosity is obtained, but when the cationic:nonionic surfactant ratio is less than 0.9 in the comparative examples, the composition is hazy after cold storage.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/448,183, filed on Jun. 21, 2019, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/032,503, filed on Jul. 11, 2018, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/049,089, filed on Feb. 21, 2016, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,179,100, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/690,320, filed on Apr. 17, 2015, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,265,714, which claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. § 365(c) of International Patent Application No. PCT/US2013/061801, filed Sep. 26, 2013, the entireties of which are incorporated herein by reference.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5290482 | Marschner et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
| 5326483 | Halloran et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
| 5641480 | Vermeer | Jun 1997 | A |
| 5661170 | Chodosh | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5723111 | Glover | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5725887 | Martin et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5827870 | Chodosh | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5994383 | Dyer et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6087400 | Dyer et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6121224 | Fonsny et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6306805 | Bratescu et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6488948 | Danieli | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6566314 | Murthy et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6572846 | Klein | Jun 2003 | B2 |
| 6616922 | Taylor et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
| 7012048 | Drovetskaya et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
| 7112559 | Mayhall et al. | Sep 2006 | B1 |
| 7169193 | Kleen | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7192601 | Walker | Mar 2007 | B2 |
| 7754770 | Curtis | Jul 2010 | B2 |
| 8193136 | Taylor et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
| 8388991 | Sondgeroth et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
| 8795641 | Pan | Aug 2014 | B2 |
| 9084734 | Collier et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
| 9232790 | Moen et al. | Jan 2016 | B2 |
| 10119409 | Charier et al. | Nov 2018 | B2 |
| 20020031487 | Klein | Mar 2002 | A1 |
| 20020169099 | Knox et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20030022941 | Taylor | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20050147575 | Muller | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050189377 | Lanzendorfer et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050198747 | Emmerling et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20070077221 | Seigneurin et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070292383 | Schepky et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20080275113 | Huetter et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20090246163 | Wahi | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20110237667 | Loeffler et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20130035396 | Moen | Feb 2013 | A1 |
| 20140100288 | DeSzalay | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140170086 | Pan et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20160030319 | Liu | Feb 2016 | A1 |
| 20180153786 | De Szalay | Jun 2018 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 1032263 | Sep 2000 | EP |
| 1465584 | Oct 2004 | EP |
| 2010039291 | Apr 2010 | WO |
| 2010127231 | Nov 2010 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Mintel Record # 1245173, Jan. 2010. |
| Mintel Record # 1268395, Feb. 2010. |
| Mintel Record # 1371278, Jul. 2010. |
| Mintel Record # 686467, Apr. 2007. |
| Mintel Record # 721749, Jun. 2007. |
| Mintel Record # 766162, Sep. 2007. |
| Mintel Record # 768340, Sep. 2007. |
| Mintel Record # 822840, Nov. 2007. |
| Mintel Record # 928927, Jun. 2008. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20200368132 A1 | Nov 2020 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 16448183 | Jun 2019 | US |
| Child | 16993330 | US | |
| Parent | 16032503 | Jul 2018 | US |
| Child | 16448183 | US | |
| Parent | 15049089 | Feb 2016 | US |
| Child | 16032503 | US | |
| Parent | 14690320 | Apr 2015 | US |
| Child | 15049089 | US | |
| Parent | PCT/US2013/061801 | Sep 2013 | US |
| Child | 14690320 | US |
