Patent Grant
10912732
The invention relates to a clear shampoo composition that comprises one or more silicone polymers. The silicone polymer is a polyorganosiloxane compound containing one or more quaternary ammonium groups, silicone blocks comprising between about 99 and about 199 siloxane units on average, at least one polyalkylene oxide structural unit; and at least one terminal ester group.
Many consumers want a clear shampoo that provides deep cleaning to remove styling product residue, pollutants, and oil leaving their hair fresh, glossy, and full of volume. However, consumers often complain that clear shampoos feel like they strip the hair, which can make the hair feel like straw and have poor wet and dry feel (i.e. the hair feels rough, tangled, and difficult to comb when it is wet and dry).
One way to improve the wet and dry feel is to add silicone to the shampoo. However, many silicones that provide good wet feel are relatively large and are visible in a clear shampoo, making the shampoo appear hazy or creamy, instead of clear. Yet smaller silicones generally do not provide consumer acceptable wet and dry feel. Furthermore, some silicones that are used in hair care products can leave the hair feeling slippery and oily instead of fresh and clean, which is generally not preferred by consumers who seek a clear shampoo.
Therefore, there is a need for a clear shampoo composition that contains a silicone polymer where the composition provides consumer acceptable wet and dry feel.
A clear shampoo composition comprising: (a) a silicone emulsion comprising: (i) an emulsifier; (ii) from about 0.1% to about 10% of one or more silicones, by weight of the composition, wherein the average particle size of the one or more silicones is from about 1 nm to about 100 nm, and wherein at least one of the silicone is a polyorganosiloxane compound comprising: (1) one or more quaternary ammonium groups; (2) silicone blocks comprising between about 99 and about 199 siloxane units on average; (3) at least one polyalkylene oxide structural unit; and (4) at least one terminal ester group; (b) from about 4% to about 45%, by weight, of a detersive surfactant; wherein the shampoo composition is clear.
While the specification concludes with claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter of the present invention, it is believed that the invention can be more readily understood from the following description taken in connection with the accompanying drawings, in which:
While the specification concludes with claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the invention, it is believed that the present disclosure will be better understood from the following description.
As used herein, the articles including “a” and “an” when used in a claim, are understood to mean one or more of what is claimed or described.
As used herein, “comprising” means that other steps and other ingredients which do not affect the end result can be added. This term encompasses the terms “consisting of” and “consisting essentially of.”
As used herein, “mixtures” is meant to include a simple combination of materials and any compounds that may result from their combination.
As used herein, “molecular weight” or “M.Wt.” refers to the weight average molecular weight unless otherwise stated. Molecular weight is measured using industry standard method, gel permeation chromatography (“GPC”).
As used herein, “substantially free” means less than 3%, alternatively less than 2%, alternatively less than 1%, alternatively less than 0.5%, alternatively less than 0.25%, alternatively less than 0.1%, alternatively less than 0.05%, alternatively less than 0.01%, alternatively less than 0.001%, and/or alternatively free of. As used herein, “free of” means 0%.
As used herein, the terms “include,” “includes,” and “including,” are meant to be non-limiting and are understood to mean “comprise,” “comprises,” and “comprising,” respectively.
All percentages, parts and ratios are based upon the total weight of the compositions of the present invention, unless otherwise specified. All such weights as they pertain to listed ingredients are based on the active level and, therefore, do not include carriers or by-products that may be included in commercially available materials.
Unless otherwise noted, all component or composition levels are in reference to the active portion of that component or composition, and are exclusive of impurities, for example, residual solvents or by-products, which may be present in commercially available sources of such components or compositions.
It should be understood that every maximum numerical limitation given throughout this specification includes every lower numerical limitation, as if such lower numerical limitations were expressly written herein. Every minimum numerical limitation given throughout this specification will include every higher numerical limitation, as if such higher numerical limitations were expressly written herein. Every numerical range given throughout this specification will include every narrower numerical range that falls within such broader numerical range, as if such narrower numerical ranges were all expressly written herein.
Where amount ranges are given, these are to be understood as being the total amount of said ingredient in the composition, or where more than one species fall within the scope of the ingredient definition, the total amount of all ingredients fitting that definition, in the composition. For example, if the composition comprises from 1% to 5% fatty alcohol, then a composition comprising 2% stearyl alcohol and 1% cetyl alcohol and no other fatty alcohol, would fall within this scope.
The amount of each particular ingredient or mixtures thereof described hereinafter can account for up to 100% (or 100%) of the total amount of the ingredient(s) in the shampoo composition.
Many consumers want a clear shampoo that provides deep cleaning and leaves the hair fresh, conditioned, and full of volume. Silicones are often added to shampoo to improve conditioning. However, some silicones are visible in clear shampoos the composition may appear hazy or creamy and/or consumers may perceive that their hair is slick and weighed down.
The shampoo can provide consumer acceptable wet conditioning and dry conditioning (i.e. parity or better wet and/or dry conditioning), while reducing the total level of actual silicone deposition as compared to shampoo compositions with current, marketed silicone emulsions (DC 1872, available from Dow Corning® and Belsil DM5500, available from Wacker®). This indicates that the clear shampoo composition could break the tradeoff normally associated with conditioning shampoo compositions, the shampoo composition can provide acceptable conditioning without the buildup of the silicone. Furthermore, the clear shampoo composition can leave the hair feeling clean without feeling stripped.
The shampoo composition can be visually clear. The shampoo can have a % Transmittance of greater than or equal to 80% and/or from about 80% to about 100%, as determined by the % Transmittance Test Method, described hereafter. In another example, the shampoo composition can be transparent and have a % transmittance greater than 30% and less than 80%. In another example, the silicone emulsion can be visually clear.
The shampoo composition can leave a general population hair switch with a final rinse friction from about 1000 gf to about 1600 gf, alternatively from about 1100 gf to about 1500 gf, and alternatively from about 1200 gf to about 1400 gf, as determined by the Hair Wet Feel Friction Measurement Test Method, described hereafter.
The shampoo compositions can leave a general population hair switch with a mean Coarse Stroke 1 from about 50 gf to about 300 gf, alternatively from about 60 gf to about 250 gf, alternatively from about 75 gf to about 200 gf, and alternatively from about 100 gf to about 150 gf, as determined by the Hair Wet Combing Test Method, described hereafter.
The shampoo compositions can leave a general population hair switch with a mean dry feel (Inter Fiber Friction (IFF)) of from about 1000 gf to about 1600 gf, alternatively from about 1100 gf to about 1550 gf, alternatively from about 1200 gf to about 1500 gf, and alternatively from about 1250 gf to about 1400 gf, as determined by the Dry Feel Test Method, described hereafter.
The shampoo composition can leave a general population hair switch with a mean silicone deposition less than 250 ppm, less than 200 ppm, alternatively less than 150 ppm, alternatively less than 100 ppm, alternatively less 90 ppm, alternatively less than 75 ppm, and alternatively less than 60 ppm. The shampoo composition can leave general population hair with a silicone deposition from about 25 ppm to about 200 ppm, alternatively from about 30 ppm to about 175 ppm, alternatively from about 35 ppm to about 150 ppm, and alternatively from about 40 ppm to about 125 ppm. The silicone deposition can be determined by the Silicone Deposition Test Method, as described hereafter.
The shampoo composition may have a liquid phase viscosity of less than 8000 centipoise (cP) (8000 mPa·s), alternatively less than 5000 cP (5000 mPa·s), alternatively less than 4000 cP (4000 mPa·s), alternatively less than 3000 cP (3000 mPa·s), alternatively less than 2500 cP (2500 mPa·s). The shampoo composition may have a liquid phase viscosity of from about 1 cP (1 mPa·s) to about 8000 cP (8000 mPa·s), alternatively from about 10 cP (10 mPa·s) to about 6000 cP (6000 mPa·s), alternatively from about 25 cP (25 mPa·s) to about 5000 cP (5000 mPa·s), alternatively from about 40 cP (40 mPa·s) to about 3000 cP (3000 mPa·s), and/or alternatively from about 50 cP (50 mPa·s) to about 3000 cP (3000 mPa·s). The shampoo composition may have a liquid phase viscosity of from about 1 cP (1 mPa·s) to about 15,000 cP (15,000 mPa·s), alternatively from about 10 cP (10 mPa·s) to about 12,000 cP (12,000 mPa·s), alternatively from about 20 cP (20 mPa·s) to about 10,000 cP (10,000 mPa·s), alternatively from about 50 cP (50 mPa·s) to about 8,000 cP (8,000 mPa·s), alternatively from about 100 cP (100 mPa·s) to about 5000 cP (5000 mPa·s), alternatively from about 250 cP (25 mPa·s) to about 3000 cP (3000 mPa·s), and/or alternatively from about 500 cP (500 mPa·s) to about 2500 cP (2500 mPa·s).
Silicones
The shampoo composition may comprise from about 0.1% to about 16%, alternatively about 0.3% to about 12%, alternatively about 0.4% to about 10%, alternatively about 0.5% to about 8%, alternatively from about 1% to about 7%, alternatively from about 2% to about 6%, alternatively from about 1% to about 5%, and alternatively from about 2% to about 4% of one or more silicones, by weight of the shampoo composition. The shampoo composition may comprise from about 5% to about 16%, alternatively from about 6% to about 14%, and alternatively from about 7% to about 12% of one or more silicones, by weight of the composition. The shampoo composition may comprise from about 0.1% to about 10%, alternatively from about 0.2% to about 7%, alternatively from about 0.4% to about 5% of one or more silicones, and alternatively from about 0.5% to about 1%, by weight of the shampoo composition.
The average particle size of the one or more silicones may be from about 1 nm to about 100 nm, alternatively from about 5 nm to about 100 nm, alternatively from about 10 nm to about 80 nm, alternatively about 10 nm to about 60 nm, alternatively about 10 nm to about 50 nm, and alternatively about 20 nm to about 50 nm. The average particle size of the one or more silicones may be less than or equal to 100 nm, alternatively less than or equal to 90 nm, alternatively less than or equal to 80 nm, alternatively less than or equal to 70 nm, alternatively less than or equal to 60 nm, alternatively less than or equal to 55 nm, alternatively less than or equal to 50 nm, alternatively less than or equal to 40 nm, and alternatively less than or equal to 30 nm. The average particle size of the one or more silicones may be greater than or equal to 1 nm, greater than or equal to 5 nm, greater than or equal to 10 nm, and greater than or equal to 20 nm.
The particle size of the one or more silicones may be measured by dynamic light scattering (DLS). A Malvern Zetasizer Nano ZEN3600 system (www.malvern.com) using He—Ne laser 633 nm may be used for the measurement at 25° C.
The autocorrelation function may be analyzed using the Zetasizer Software provided by Malvern Instruments, which determines the effective hydrodynamic radius, using the Stokes-Einstein equation:
wherein kB is the Boltzmann Constant, T is the absolute temperature, η is the viscosity of the medium, D is the mean diffusion coefficient of the scattering species, and R is the hydrodynamic radius of particles.
Particle size (i.e. hydrodynamic radius) may be obtained by correlating the observed speckle pattern that arises due to Brownian motion and solving the Stokes-Einstein equation, which relates the particle size to the measured diffusion constant, as is known in the art.
Polydispersity index (PDI) is a dimensionless measure of the broadness of the size distribution calculated from the cumulants analysis in Dynamic Light Scattering and is calculated according to the following equation.
Polydispersity index (PDI)=(the square of standard deviation)/(the square of mean diameter)
The polydispersity index (PDI) of the average silicone droplet size can be less than 0.5, alternatively less than 0.4, alternatively less than 0.3, and alternatively less than 0.2. The PDI of the average silicone size can be from 0 to about 0.6, alternatively from about 0 to about 0.4, alternatively from about 0 to about 0.2.
For each sample, 3 measurements may be made, and Z-average values may be reported as the average particle size.
The one or more silicones may be in the form of a nanoemulsion. The average particle size referred to herein is z-average measured by dynamic light scattering. The nanoemulsion may comprise any silicone suitable for application to the skin and/or hair. The nanoemulsion described herein may be prepared by the following methods: (1) mechanically breaking down the emulsion droplet size; (2) spontaneously forming the emulsion (may be referred to as a microemulsion in the literature); and (3) using emulsion polymerization to achieve average particle size in the target range described herein. From about 25% to about 100% of the one or more silicones can be in the form of a nanoemulsion, in another embodiment from about 50% to about 100% of the one or more silicones can be in the form of a nanoemulsion, and in another embodiment from about 75% to about 100% of the one or more silicones can be in the form of a nanoemulsion.
Silicone Polymer Containing Quaternary Groups
The compositions of the present invention comprise a low viscosity silicone polymer having a viscosity up to 100,000 mPa·s. Without being bound by theory, this low viscosity silicone polymer provides improved conditioning benefits over conventional silicones because of the addition of hydrophilic functionalities—quaternary amines, ethylene oxides/propylene oxides. Compared to previously disclosed silicones with quaternary functionality, these new structures are significantly lower in viscosity, so that they don't have to be blended with other lower viscosity diluents and dispersants to allow them to be formulated into products. Low viscosity silicone solvents and diluents can often cause viscosity and stability tradeoffs in shampoo products. The current invention eliminates the need for these materials since the silicone polymer is low enough in viscosity to be added directly or in emulsion form. The improved conditioning benefits include smooth feel, reduced friction, and prevention of hair damage, while, in some embodiments, eliminating the need for a silicone blend.
Structurally, the silicone polymer is a polyorganosiloxane compound comprising one or more quaternary ammonium groups, at least one silicone block comprising an average between 99 and 199 siloxane units, at least one polyalkylene oxide structural unit, and at least one terminal ester group. The silicone block may comprise an average from about 99 to about 199 siloxane units, alternatively from about 110 to about 199 siloxane units, alternatively about 120 to about 199 siloxane units, alternatively about 130 to about 199 siloxane units, alternatively about 110 to about 190 siloxane units, alternatively about 130 to about 190 siloxane units, alternatively about 110 to about 175 siloxane units, alternatively about 120 to about 175 siloxane units, alternatively about 130 to about 175 siloxane units, alternatively about 110 to about 155 siloxane units, alternatively about 120 to about 155 siloxane units, alternatively about 130 to about 155 siloxane units, alternatively about 155 to about 199 siloxane units, alternatively about 155 to about 190 siloxane units, and alternatively about 155 to about 175 siloxane units. The silicone block may comprise on average from about 120 to about 170 siloxane units, and alternatively from about 120 to about 145 siloxane units. The silicone block may comprise on average from about 145 to about 170 siloxane units.
The silicone block may comprise greater than or equal to 99 siloxane units, alternatively greater than 120 siloxane units, alternatively greater than 130 siloxane units, alternatively greater than 135 siloxane units, alternatively greater than 140 siloxane units, alternatively greater than or equal to 145 siloxane units. The silicone block may comprise less than 200 siloxane units, alternatively less than 180 siloxane units, alternatively less than 175 siloxane units, alternatively less than or equal to 170 siloxane units.
The average block length reflects mean values. They can be determined by i.e. 1H-NMR spectroscopy or GPC using protocols known in the art.
The polyorganosiloxane compounds can have a molar ratio of silicone to alkylene oxide block of about 2:1 to about 20:1, alternatively from about 4:1 to about 16:1, alternatively from about 6:1 to about 12:1, and alternatively from about 8:1 to about 10:1.
The nitrogen content for the polyoranosiloxane compounds can be from about 0.1 to about 0.4 mmol N/g polymer, alternatively from about 0.1 to about 0.3 mm N/g polymer, and alternatively from about 0.13 to about 0.27 mmol N/g polymer. The nitrogen content for the polyoranosiloxane compounds can be from about 0.13 to about 0.35 mmol N/g polymer, alternatively from about 0.15 to about 0.3 mmol N/g polymer, alternatively from about 0.17 to about 0.27 mmol N/g polymer, and alternatively from about 0.19 to about 0.24 mmol N/g polymer.
The polyorganosiloxane compounds according to the invention may have the general formulas (Ia) and (Ib):
M-Y—[-N+R2-T-N+R2)—Y—]m-[—(NR2-A-E-A′-NR2)—Y—]k-M (Ia)
M-Y—[-(N+R2-T-N+R2)—Y—]m-[—(N+R22-A-E-A′-NR22)—Y—]k-M (Ib)
wherein:
The residues K may be identical or different from each other. In the —K—S—K— moiety, the residue K is bound to the silicon atom of the residue S via a C—Si-bond.
Due to the possible presence of amine groups (—(NR2-A-E-A′-NR2)—) in the polyorganosiloxane compounds, they may have protonated ammonium groups, resulting from the protonation of such amine groups with organic or inorganic acids. Such compounds are sometimes referred to as acid addition salts of the polyorganosiloxane compounds according to the invention.
The molar ratio of the quaternary ammonium groups b) and the terminal ester groups c) is less than 20:3, alternatively less than 5:1, alternatively less than 10:3 and alternatively less than 2:1. The ratio can be determined by 13C-NMR or 1H-NMR.
The silicone polymer has a viscosity at 20° C. and a shear rate of 0.1 s−1 (plate-plate system, plate diameter 40 mm, gap width 0.5 mm) of less than 100,000 mPa·s (100 mPa·s). The viscosities of the neat silicone polymers may range from about 500 to about 100,000 mPa·s, alternatively from about 500 to about 70,000 mPa·s, alternatively from about 500 to about 50,000 mPa·s, alternatively from about 500 to about 30,000 mPa·s, alternatively from about 2,000 to about 100,000 mPa·s, alternatively from about 2,000 to about 70,000 mPa·s, alternatively from about 2,000 to about 50,000 mPa·s, alternatively from about 2,000 to about 30,000 mPa·s, alternatively from about 8,000 to about 100,000 mPa·s, alternatively from about 8,000 to about 70,000 mPa·s, alternatively from about 8,000 to about 50,000 mPa·s, alternatively from about 8,000 to about 30,000 mPa·s, alternatively from about 15,000 to about 100,000 mPa·s, alternatively from about 15,000 to about 70,000 mPa·s, alternatively from about 15,000 to about 50,000 mPa·s, alternatively from about 15,000 to about 30,000 mPa·s determined at 20° C. and a shear rate of 0.1 s−1.
In addition to the above listed silicone polymers, it can be desirably to use the embodiments provided below. For example, in the polyalkylene oxide group E of the general formula:
—[CH2CH2O]q—[CH2CH(CH3)O]r—[CH2CH(C2H5)O]s—
For polyorganosiloxane structural units with the general formula S:
R1=C1-C22-alkyl, C1-C22-fluoralkyl or aryl; n=from 99 to 199, K (in the group —K—S—K—) is preferably a bivalent or trivalent straight chain, cyclical or branched C2-C20 hydrocarbon residue which is optionally interrupted by —O—, —NH—, trivalent N, —NR1—, —C(O)—, —C(S)—, and optionally substituted with —OH.
R1 can be C1-C18 alkyl, C1-C18 fluoroalkyl and aryl. Furthermore, R1 is preferably C1-C18 alkyl, C1-C6 fluoroalkyl and aryl. Furthermore, R1 is alternatively C1-C6 alkyl, C1-C6 fluoroalkyl, alternatively C1-C4 fluoroalkyl, and phenyl. Alternatively, R1 is methyl, ethyl, trifluoropropyl and phenyl.
As used herein, the term “C1-C22 alkyl” means that the aliphatic hydrocarbon groups possess from 1 to 22 carbon atoms which can be straight chain or branched. Methyl, ethyl, propyl, n-butyl, pentyl, hexyl, heptyl, nonyl, decyl, undecyl, isopropyl, neopentyl and 1,2,3-trimethyl hexyl moieties serve as examples.
Further as used herein, the term “C1-C22 fluoroalkyl” means aliphatic hydrocarbon compounds with 1 to 22 carbon atoms which can be straight chain or branched and are substituted with at least one fluorine atom. Monofluormethyl, monofluoroethyl, 1,1,1-trifluorethyl, perfluoroethyl, 1,1,1-trifluoropropyl, 1,2,2-trifluorobutyl are suitable examples.
Moreover, the term “aryl” means unsubstituted or phenyl substituted once or several times with OH, F, Cl, CF3, C1-C6 alkyl, C1-C6 alkoxy, C3-C7 cycloalkyl, C2-C6 alkenyl or phenyl. Aryl may also mean naphthyl.
The positive charges resulting from the ammonium group(s) of the polyorganosiloxane, can be neutralized with inorganic anions such as chloride, bromide, hydrogen sulfate, sulfate, or organic anions, like carboxylates deriving from C1-C30 carboxylic acids, for example acetate, propionate, octanoate, especially from C10-C18 carboxylic acids, for example decanoate, dodecanoate, tetradecanoate, hexadecanoate, octadecanoate and oleate, alkylpolyethercarboxylate, alkylsulphonate, arylsulphonate, alkylarylsulphonate, alkylsulphate, alkylpolyethersulphate, phosphates derived from phosphoric acid mono alkyl/aryl ester and phosphoric acid dialkyl/aryl ester. The properties of the polyorganosiloxane compounds can be, inter alia, modified based upon the selection of acids used.
The quaternary ammonium groups are usually generated by reacting the di-tertiary amines with an alkylating agents, selected from in particular di-epoxides (sometimes referred to also as bis-epoxides) in the presence of mono carboxylic acids and difunctional dihalogen alkyl compounds.
The polyorganosiloxane compounds can be of the general formulas (Ia) and (Ib):
M-Y—[-N+R2-T-N+R2)—Y—]m-[—(NR2-A-E-A′-NR2)—Y—]k-M (Ia)
M-Y—[-(N+R2-T-N+R2)—Y—]m-[—(N+R22-A-E-A′-NR22)—Y—]k-M (Ib)
The polyorganosiloxane compounds may be also of the general formulas (IIa) or (IIb):
M-Y—[-N+R2—Y—]m-[—(NR2-A-E-A′-NR2)—Y—]k-M (IIa)
M-Y—[-N+R2—Y—]m-[—(N+R22-A-E-A′-N+R22)—Y—]k-M (IIb)
The molar ratio of the polyorganosiloxane-containing repeating group —K—S—K— and the polyalkylene repeating group -A-E-A′- or -A′-E-A- is between 1:100 and 100:1, alternatively between 1:20 to 20:1, or alternatively between 1:10 to 10:1.
In the group —(N+R2-T-N+R2)—, R may represent a monovalent straight chain, cyclic or branched C1-C20 hydrocarbon radical, which can be interrupted by one or more —O—, —C(O)— and can be substituted by —OH, T may represent a divalent straight-chain, cyclic, or branched C1-C20 hydrocarbon radical, which can be interrupted by —O—, —C(O)— and can be substituted by hydroxyl.
The above described polyorganosiloxane compounds comprising quaternary ammonium functions and ester functions may also contain: 1) individual molecules which contain quaternary ammonium functions and no ester functions; 2) molecules which contain quaternary ammonium functions and ester functions; and 3) molecules which contain ester functions and no quaternary ammonium functions. While not limited to structure, the above described polyorganosiloxane compounds comprising quaternary ammonium functions and ester functions are to be understood as mixtures of molecules comprising a certain averaged amount and ratio of both moieties.
Various monofunctional organic acids may be utilized to yield the esters can include C1-C30 carboxylic acids, for example C2, C3, C8 acids, C10-C18 carboxylic acids, for example C12, C14, C16 acids, saturated, unsaturated and hydroxyl functionalized C18 acids, alkylpolyethercarboxylic acids, alkylsulphonic acids, arylsulphonic acids, alkylarylsulphonic acids, alkylsulphuric acids, alkylpolyethersulphuric acids, phosphoric acid mono alkyl/aryl esters and phosphoric acid dialkyl/aryl esters.
Detersive Surfactant
The compact shampoo compositions described herein can include one or more detersive surfactants. The detersive surfactant can be selected from anionic surfactants, amphoteric surfactants, zwitterionic surfactants, and combinations thereof.
The concentration of the detersive surfactant in the composition should be sufficient to provide the desired cleaning and lather performance. The compact shampoo composition can comprise a total detersive surfactant level of from about 4% to about 45%, by weight, from about 10% to about 40%, by weight, and/or from about 12% to about 35%, by weight, from about 15% to about 30%, by weight, and/or from about 17% to about 28%, and/or from about 20% to about 25%. The compact shampoo composition can comprise a total detersive surfactant level of from greater than 13%, greater than 16%, greater than 20%, greater than 22%, and/or greater than 25% by weight.
The detersive surfactant can comprise an anionic surfactant. Suitable anionic detersive surfactant components for use in the composition herein can include those which are known for use in hair care or other personal care compositions, including shampoos. Suitable anionic surfactants for compact shampoo compositions described herein can include alkyl sulfates and alkyl ether sulfates, water-soluble olefin sulfonates, beta-alkyloxy alkane sulfonates, other sulfonates, succinate surfactants, other sulfonates, and/or other surfactants that are substantially free of sulfates.
The compact shampoo composition may comprise from about 2% to about 40%, from about 4% to about 36%, from about 8% to about 32%, from about 10% to about 30%, and/or from about 12% to about 28%, by weight, of one or more anionic detersive surfactants.
Anionic surfactants suitable for use herein include alkyl sulfates and alkyl ether sulfates of the formula ROSO3M and RO(C2H4O)xSO3M, wherein R can be a linear or branched alkyl or alkenyl chain of from about 8 to about 18 carbon atoms, x can be from 1 to 10, and M is a water-soluble cation such as ammonium, sodium, potassium, and triethanolamine cation or salts of the divalent magnesium ion with two anionic surfactant anions. The alkyl ether sulfates may be made as condensation products of ethylene oxide and monohydric alcohols having from about 8 to about 24 carbon atoms. The alcohols can be derived from fats such as coconut oil, palm oil, palm kernel oil, or tallow, or can be synthetic.
The composition can also include anionic alkyl sulfates and alkyl ether sulfate surfactants having branched alkyl chains which are synthesized from C8 to C18 branched alcohols which may be selected from: Guerbet alcohols, aldol condensation derived alcohols, oxo alcohols and mixtures thereof. Non-limiting examples of the 2-alkyl branched alcohols include oxo alcohols such as 2-methyl-1-undecanol, 2-ethyl-1-decanol, 2-propyl-1-nonanol, 2-butyl 1-octanol, 2-methyl-1-dodecanol, 2-ethyl-1-undecanol, 2-propyl-1-decanol, 2-butyl-1-nonanol, 2-pentyl-1-octanol, 2-pentyl-1-heptanol, and those sold under the tradenames LIAL® (Sasol), ISALCHEM® (Sasol), and NEODOL® (Shell), and Guerbet and aldol condensation derived alcohols such as 2-ethyl-1-hexanol, 2-propyl-1-butanol, 2-butyl-1-octanol, 2-butyl-1-decanol, 2-pentyl-1-nonanol, 2-hexyl-1-octanol, 2-hexyl-1-decanol and those sold under the tradename ISOFOL® (Sasol) or sold as alcohol ethoxylates and alkoxylates under the tradenames LUTENSOL XP® (BASF) and LUTENSOL XL® (BASF).
The anionic alkyl sulfates and alkyl ether sulfates may also include those synthesized from C8 to C18 branched alcohols derived from butylene or propylene which are sold under the trade names EXXAL™ (Exxon) and Marlipal® (Sasol). This includes anionic surfactants of the subclass of sodium trideceth-n sulfates (STnS), where n is between about 0.5 and about 3.5. Exemplary surfactants of this subclass are sodium trideceth-2 sulfates and sodium trideceth-3 sulfates. The composition can also include sodium tridecyl sulfate.
Suitable surfactants that are substantially free of sulfates can include isethionates, sarcosinates, sulfonates, sulfosuccinates, sulfoacetates, glycinates, glutamates, glucose carboxylates, amphoacetates. taurates, other acyl aminoacids, betaines, sultaines, and/or phosphate esters. Suitable surfactants that are substantially free of sulfates can contain carboxylic acids.
The composition can contain suitable anionic detersive surfactants, which can include water-soluble olefin sulfonates which have the general formula R1—SO3M where R1 is a straight or branched chain, saturated, aliphatic hydrocarbon radical having from 10 to 24 carbon atoms, 10 to 18 carbon atoms, or from 13 to 15 carbon atoms; and M is a water-soluble cation such as ammonium, sodium, potassium, triethanolamine cation, or salts of the divalent magnesium ion with two anionic surfactant anions. Suitable olefin sulfonates such as sodium paraffin sulfonates can be produced through the reaction of SO2 and O2 with a suitable chain length paraffin.
Suitable anionic detersive surfactants can include beta-alkyloxy alkane sulfonates. Beta-alkyloxy alkane sulfonates surfactants conform to Formula I:
where R2 is a straight chain alkyl group having from about 6 to about 20 carbon atoms, R3 is a lower alkyl group having from about 1 to about 3 carbon atoms, preferably 1 carbon atom, and M is a water-soluble cation as previously described in the water-soluble olefin sulfonates.
Suitable anionic detersive surfactants can include isethionate surfactants. For example, suitable isethionate surfactants can include the reaction product of fatty acids esterified with isethionic acid and neutralized with sodium hydroxide. Suitable fatty acids for isethionate surfactants can be derived from coconut oil or palm kernel oil including amides of methyl tauride.
Detersive anionic surfactants can be succinate surfactants. Examples of suitable succinate surfactants can include disodium N-octadecylsulfo succinate, disodium lauryl sulfosuccinate, diammonium lauryl sulfosuccinate, laureth sulfosuccinate, tetrasodium N-(1,2-dicarboxyethyl)-N-octadecylsulfosuccinate, diamyl ester of sodium sulfosuccinic acid, dihexyl ester of sodium sulfosuccinic acid, and dioctyl esters of sodium sulfosuccinic acid. Examples of additional anionic surfactants suitable for use herein include, but are not limited to, ammonium lauryl sulfate, ammonium laureth sulfate, triethylamine lauryl sulfate, triethylamine laureth sulfate, triethanolamine lauryl sulfate, triethanolamine laureth sulfate, monoethanolamine lauryl sulfate, monoethanolamine laureth sulfate, diethanolamine lauryl sulfate, diethanolamine laureth sulfate, lauric monoglyceride sodium sulfate, sodium lauryl sulfate, sodium laureth sulfate, potassium laureth sulfate, sodium lauryl sarcosinate, sodium lauroyl sarcosinate, sodium lauryl sarcosine, sodium cocoyl sarcosine, ammonium cocoyl sulfate, ammonium lauroyl sulfate, sodium cocoyl sulfate, sodium lauroyl sulfate, potassium cocoyl sulfate, potassium lauryl sulfate, monoethanolamine cocoyl sulfate, sodium trideceth-1 sulfate, sulfate, sodium trideceth-2 sulfate, sulfate, sodium trideceth-3 sulfate, sodium tridecyl sulfate, sodium methyl lauroyl taurate, sodium methyl cocoyl taurate, sodium lauroyl isethionate, sodium lauroyl methyl isethionate (“SLMI”), sodium laureth sulfosuccinate, sodium lauryl sulfosuccinate, sodium C12-C14 olefin sulfonate, sodium tridecyl benzene sulfonate, sodium dodecyl benzene sulfonate, sodium lauroyl glycinate, sodium cocoamphoacetate, sodium cocoyl glutamate, sodium lauroyl glutamate, sodium lauryl glucose carboxylate, sodium phosphate ester surfactants, and fatty acid surfactants. and mixtures thereof.
Additional anionic surfactants suitable for use herein include, but not limited to, acyl isethionate, acyl methyl isethionate, acyl glutamate, acyl glycinate, acyl sarcosinate, acyl alaninate, acyl taurate, sulfosuccinate, alkyl benzene sulfonate, alkyl ether carboxylate, alkylamphoacetate, alpha olefin sulfonate, and mixtures thereof. Examples of such suitable anionic surfactants include, but not limited to, sodium cocoyl isethionate (SCI), sodium lauroyl isethionate, sodium lauroyl methyl isethionate, sodium cocoyl glutamate, disodium cocoyl glutamate, sodium lauroyl glutamate, disodium lauroyl glutamate, sodium cocoyl alaninate, sodium lauroyl alaninate, sodium lauroyl glycinate, sodium cocoyl glycinate, sodium laureth sulfosuccinate, disodium laureth sulfosuccinate, sodium lauryl sulfosuccinate, disodium lauryl sulfosuccinate, sodium lauryl glucose carboxylate, sodium cocoyl glucose carboxylate, sodium cocoyl amphoacetate, sodium lauroyl amphoacetate, sodium methyl cocoyl taurate, and mixtures thereof.
The compact shampoo composition may comprise from about 0% to about 25%, from about 0.1% to about 20%, from about 0.5% to about 15%, from about 1% to about 10%, by weight, of one or more co-surfactants selected from the group consisting of amphoteric surfactants, zwitterionic surfactants, non-inonic surfactants, and mixtures thereof. The composition can comprise a co-surfactant selected from the group consisting of: amphoteric surfactants, zwitterionic surfactants, and mixtures thereof. Non-limiting examples of suitable zwitterionic or amphoteric surfactants are described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,104,646 (Bolich Jr. et al.), U.S. Pat. No. 5,106,609 (Bolich Jr. et al.).
Amphoteric surfactants suitable for use in the composition are well known in the art, and include those surfactants broadly described as derivatives of aliphatic secondary and tertiary amines in which the aliphatic radical can be straight or branched chain and wherein one of the aliphatic substituents contains from about 8 to about 18 carbon atoms and one contains an anionic group such as carboxy, sulfonate, sulfate, phosphate, or phosphonate. The amphoteric surfactant can be selected from the group consisting of: sodium cocaminopropionate, sodium cocaminodipropionate, sodium cocoamphoacetate, sodium cocoamphohydroxypropylsulfonate, sodium cocoamphopropionate, sodium comamphopropionate, sodium lauraminopropionate, sodium lauroamphoacetate, sodium lauroamphohydroxypropylsulfonate, sodium lauroamphopropionate, sodium cornamphopropionate, sodium lauriminodipropionate, ammonium cocaminopropionate, ammonium cocaminodipropionate, ammonium cocoamphoacetate, ammonium cocoamphohydroxypropylsulfonate, ammonium cocoamphopropionate, ammonium comamphopropionate, ammonium lauraminopropionate, ammonium lauroamphoacetate, ammonium lauroamphohydroxypropylsulfonate, ammonium lauroamphopropionate, ammonium comamphopropionate, ammonium lauriminodipropionate, triethanonlamine cocaminopropionate, triethanonlamine cocaminodipropionate, triethanonlamine cocoamphoacetate, triethanonlamine cocoamphohydroxypropylsulfonate, triethanonlamine cocoamphopropionate, triethanonlamine cornamphopropionate, triethanonlamine lauraminopropionate, triethanonlamine lauroamphoacetate, triethanonlamine lauroamphohydroxypropylsulfonate, triethanonlamine lauroamphopropionate, triethanonlamine comamphopropionate, triethanonlamine lauriminodipropionate, cocoamphodipropionic acid, disodium caproamphodiacetate, disodium caproamphoadipropionate, disodium capryloamphodiacetate, disodium capryloamphodipriopionate, disodium cocoamphocarboxyethylhydroxypropylsulfonate, disodium cocoamphodiacetate, disodium cocoamphodipropionate, disodium dicarboxyethylcocopropylenediamine, disodium laureth-5 carboxyamphodiacetate, disodium lauriminodipropionate, disodium lauroamphodiacetate, disodium lauroamphodipropionate, disodium oleoamphodipropionate, disodium PPG-2-isodecethyl-7 carboxyamphodiacetate, lauraminopropionic acid, lauroamphodipropionic acid, lauryl aminopropylglycine, lauryl diethylenediaminoglycine, and mixtures thereof.
The amphoteric surfactant can be a surfactant according to the following structure:
wherein R10 is a C-linked monovalent substituent selected from the group consisting of: substituted alkyl systems comprising 9 to 15 carbon atoms, unsubstituted alkyl systems comprising 9 to 15 carbon atoms, straight alkyl systems comprising 9 to 15 carbon atoms, branched alkyl systems comprising 9 to 15 carbon atoms, and unsaturated alkyl systems comprising 9 to 15 carbon atoms; and wherein R11, R12, and R13 are each independently selected from the group consisting of: C-linked divalent straight alkyl systems comprising 1 to 3 carbon atoms, and C-linked divalent branched alkyl systems comprising 1 to 3 carbon atoms; and wherein M is a monovalent counterion selected from the group consisting of sodium, ammonium and protonated triethanolamine. The amphoteric surfactant is selected from the group consisting of: sodium cocoamphoacetate, sodium cocoamphodiacetate, sodium lauroamphoacetate, sodium lauroamphodiacetate, ammonium lauroamphoacetate, ammonium cocoamphoacetate, triethanolamine lauroamphoacetate, triethanolamine cocoamphoacetate, and mixtures thereof.
The detersive surfactant system may comprise at least 1%, by weight, of the composition, of one or more zwitterionic surfactants which possess a hydroxyl group in their molecular structure. The zwitterionic surfactant can be a derivative of an aliphatic quaternary ammonium, phosphonium, and sulfonium compound, in which the aliphatic radicals are straight or branched chain, and wherein one of the aliphatic substituents contains from about 8 to about 18 carbon atoms and one contains an anionic group such as carboxy, sulfonate, sulfate, phosphate or phosphonate. The zwitterionic surfactant is selected from the group consisting of: cocamidoethyl betaine, cocamidopropylamine oxide, cocamidopropyl betaine, cocamidopropyl dimethylaminohydroxypropyl hydrolyzed collagen, cocamidopropyldimonium hydroxypropyl hydrolyzed collagen, cocamidopropyl hydroxysultaine, cocobetaineamido amphopropionate, coco-betaine, coco-hydroxysultaine, coco/oleamidopropyl betaine, coco-sultaine, lauramidopropyl betaine, lauryl betaine, lauryl hydroxysultaine, lauryl sultaine, and mixtures thereof. The zwitterionic surfactant can be selected from the group consisting of: lauryl hydroxysultaine, cocamidopropyl hydroxysultaine, coco-betaine, coco-hydroxysultaine, coco-sultaine, lauryl betaine, lauryl sultaine, and mixtures thereof.
The surfactant can be selected from the group consisting of: zwitterionic surfactants, amphoteric surfactants, non-ionic surfactants, and mixtures thereof. The surfactant can be an anionic surfactant and the composition further comprises a co-surfactant, wherein the co-surfactant is selected from the group consisting of: zwitterionic surfactants, amphoteric surfactants, non-ionic surfactants, and mixtures thereof. The co-surfactant can be a non-ionic surfactant selected from the group consisting of: Cocamide, Cocamide Methyl MEA, Cocamide DEA, Cocamide MEA, Cocamide MIPA, Lauramide DEA, Lauramide MEA, Lauramide MIPA, Myristamide DEA, Myristamide MEA, PEG-20 Cocamide MEA, PEG-2 Cocamide, PEG-3 Cocamide, PEG-4 Cocamide, PEG-5 Cocamide, PEG-6 Cocamide, PEG-7 Cocamide, PEG-3 Lauramide, PEG-5 Lauramide, PEG-3 Oleamide, PPG-2 Cocamide, PPG-2 Hydroxyethyl Cocamide, and mixtures thereof. The co-surfactant can be a zwitterionic surfactant, wherein the zwitterionic surfactant is selected from the group consisting of: lauryl hydroxysultaine, cocamidopropyl hydroxysultaine, coco-betaine, coco-hydroxysultaine, cocosultaine, lauryl betaine, lauryl sultaine, and mixtures thereof.
Liquid Carrier
Inclusion of an appropriate quantity of a liquid carrier can facilitate the formation of a shampoo composition having an appropriate liquid viscosity and rheology. A shampoo composition can include, by weight of the composition, about 50% to about 95%, of a liquid carrier, about 60% to about 85%, about 65% to about 80%, about 68% to about 78%, and/or about 70% to about 77%.
A liquid carrier can be water or can be a miscible mixture of water and organic solvent. A liquid carrier can be water with minimal or no significant concentrations of organic solvent, except as otherwise incidentally incorporated into the composition as minor ingredients of other essential or optional components. Suitable organic solvents can include water solutions of lower alkyl alcohols and polyhydric alcohols. Useful lower alkyl alcohols include monohydric alcohols having 1 to 6 carbons, such as ethanol and isopropanol. Exemplary polyhydric alcohols include propylene glycol, hexylene glycol, glycerin, and propane diol.
Optional Ingredients
The foamed shampoo composition may further comprise one or more optional ingredients, including but not limited to, benefit agents. Suitable benefit agents include, but are not limited to non-silicone conditioning agents, cationic polymers, anti-dandruff actives, gel networks, chelating agents, and natural oils such as sun flower oil or castor oil. Additional suitable optional ingredients include but are not limited to perfumes, perfume microcapsules, colorants, particles, anti-microbials, foam busters, anti-static agents, rheology modifiers and thickeners, suspension materials and structurants, pH adjusting agents and buffers, preservatives, pearlescent agents, solvents, diluents, anti-oxidants, vitamins and combinations thereof.
Such optional ingredients should be physically and chemically compatible with the components of the composition, and should not otherwise unduly impair product stability, aesthetics, or performance. The CTFA Cosmetic Ingredient Handbook, Tenth Edition (published by the Cosmetic, Toiletry, and Fragrance Association, Inc., Washington, D.C.) (2004) (hereinafter “CTFA”), describes a wide variety of nonlimiting materials that can be added to the composition herein.
Non-Silicone Conditioning Agents
The conditioning agent of the foamed shampoo compositions described herein may also comprise at least one organic conditioning agents, either alone or in combination with other conditioning agents, such as the silicones described above. Non-limiting examples of organic conditioning agents are described below.
Hydrocarbon Oils
Suitable organic conditioning agents for use as conditioning agents in shampoo compositions include, but are not limited to, hydrocarbon oils having at least about 10 carbon atoms, such as cyclic hydrocarbons, straight chain aliphatic hydrocarbons (saturated or unsaturated), and branched chain aliphatic hydrocarbons (saturated or unsaturated), including polymers and mixtures thereof. Straight chain hydrocarbon oils can be from about C12 to about C19. Branched chain hydrocarbon oils, including hydrocarbon polymers, typically will contain more than 19 carbon atoms.
Polyolefins
Organic conditioning oils for use in the foamed shampoo compositions described herein also include liquid polyolefins, including liquid poly-α-olefins and/or hydrogenated liquid poly-α-olefins. Polyolefins for use herein are prepared by polymerization of C4 to about C14 olefenic monomers, and in one embodiment from about C6 to about C12.
Fatty Esters
Other suitable organic conditioning agents for use as a conditioning agent in the foamed shampoo compositions described herein include fatty esters having at least 10 carbon atoms. These fatty esters include esters with hydrocarbyl chains derived from fatty acids or alcohols. The hydrocarbyl radicals of the fatty esters hereof may include or have covalently bonded thereto other compatible functionalities, such as amides and alkoxy moieties (e.g., ethoxy or ether linkages, etc.). Other oligomeric or polymeric esters, prepared from unsaturated glyceryl esters can also be used as conditioning materials.
Fluorinated Conditioning Compounds
Fluorinated compounds suitable for delivering conditioning to hair as organic conditioning agents include perfluoropolyethers, perfluorinated olefins, fluorine based specialty polymers that may be in a fluid or elastomer form similar to the silicone fluids previously described, and perfluorinated dimethicones.
Fatty Alcohols
Other suitable organic conditioning oils for use in the foamed shampoo compositions described herein include, but are not limited to, fatty alcohols having at least about 10 carbon atoms, about 10 to about 22 carbon atoms, and in one embodiment about 12 to about 16 carbon atoms.
Alkyl Glucosides and Alkyl Glucoside Derivatives
Suitable organic conditioning oils for use in the foamed shampoo compositions described herein include, but are not limited to, alkyl glucosides and alkyl glucoside derivatives. Specific non-limiting examples of suitable alkyl glucosides and alkyl glucoside derivatives include Glucam E-10, Glucam E-20, Glucam P-10, and Glucquat 125 commercially available from Amerchol.
Polyethylene Glycols
Additional compounds useful herein as conditioning agents include polyethylene glycols and polypropylene glycols having a molecular weight of up to about 2,000,000 such as those with CTFA names PEG-200, PEG-400, PEG-600, PEG-1000, PEG-2M, PEG-7M, PEG-14M, PEG-45M and mixtures thereof.
Cationic Polymer
The shampoo composition can also comprise a cationic polymer. These cationic polymers can include at least one of (a) a cationic guar polymer, (b) a cationic non-guar galactomannan polymer, (c) a cationic tapioca polymer, (d) a cationic copolymer of acrylamide monomers and cationic monomers, and/or (e) a synthetic, non-crosslinked, cationic polymer, which may or may not form lyotropic liquid crystals upon combination with the detersive surfactant (f) a cationic cellulose polymer. Additionally, the cationic polymer can be a mixture of cationic polymers.
The shampoo composition may comprise a cationic guar polymer, which is a cationically substituted galactomannan (guar) gum derivatives. Guar gum for use in preparing these guar gum derivatives is typically obtained as a naturally occurring material from the seeds of the guar plant. The guar molecule itself is a straight chain mannan, which is branched at regular intervals with single membered galactose units on alternative mannose units. The mannose units are linked to each other by means of β(1-4) glycosidic linkages. The galactose branching arises by way of an α(1-6) linkage. Cationic derivatives of the guar gums are obtained by reaction between the hydroxyl groups of the polygalactomannan and reactive quaternary ammonium compounds. The degree of substitution of the cationic groups onto the guar structure should be sufficient to provide the requisite cationic charge density described above.
The cationic polymer, can include, but not limited, to a cationic guar polymer, has a weight average molecular weight of less than 2.0 million g/mol, or from about 10 thousand to about 2 million g/mol, or from about 50 thousand to about 2 million g/mol, or from about 100 thousand to about 2 million g/mol, or from about 10 thousand to about 1 million g/mol, or from about 25 thousand to about 1 million g/mol, or from about 50 thousand to about 1 million g/mol, or from about 100 thousand to about 1 million g/mol. The cationic guar polymer can have a charge density of from about 0.2 to about 2.2 meq/g, or from about 0.3 to about 2.0 meq/g, or from about 0.4 to about 1.8 meq/g; or from about 0.5 meq/g to about 1.7 meq/g.
The cationic guar polymer can have a weight average molecular weight of less than 1.0 million g/mol, and has a charge density of from about 0.1 meq/g to about 2.5 meq/g. In an embodiment, the cationic guar polymer has a weight average molecular weight of less than 950 thousand g/mol, or from about 10 thousand to about 900 thousand g/mol, or from about 25 thousand to about 900 thousand g/mol, or from about 50 thousand to about 900 thousand g/mol, or from about 100 thousand to about 900 thousand g/mol. from about 150 thousand to about 800 thousand g/mol. The cationic guar polymer can have a charge density of from about 0.2 to about 2.2 meq/g, or from about 0.3 to about 2.0 meq/g, or from about 0.4 to about 1.8 meq/g; or from about 0.5 meq/g to about 1.5 meq/g. The shampoo composition can comprise from about from about 0.05% to about 2%, from about 0.05% to about 1.8%, from about 0.05% to about 1.5%, from about 0.05% to about 1.2%, from about 0.05% to about 1%, from about 0.05% to about 0.9%, from about 0.1% to about 0.8%, or from about 0.2% to about 0.7% of cationic polymer (a), by total weight of the composition.
The cationic guar polymer may be formed from quaternary ammonium compounds. The quaternary ammonium compounds for forming the cationic guar polymer can conform to the general formula 1:
wherein where R3, R4 and R5 are methyl or ethyl groups; R6 is either an epoxyalkyl group of the general formula 2:
or R6 is a halohydrin group of the general formula 3:
wherein R7 is a C1 to C3 alkylene; X is chlorine or bromine, and Z is an anion such as Cl—, Br—, I— or HSO4—.
The cationic guar polymer can conform to the general formula 4:
wherein R8 is guar gum; and wherein R4, R5, R6 and R7 are as defined above; and wherein Z is a halogen. The cationic guar polymer can conform to Formula 5:
Suitable cationic guar polymers include cationic guar gum derivatives, such as guar hydroxypropyltrimonium chloride. The cationic guar polymer can be a guar hydroxypropyltrimonium chloride. Specific examples of guar hydroxypropyltrimonium chlorides include the Jaguar® series commercially available from Rhone-Poulenc Incorporated, for example Jaguar® C-500, commercially available from Rhodia. Jaguar® C-500 has a charge density of 0.8 meq/g and a weight average molecular weight of 500,000 g/mol. Other suitable guar hydroxypropyltrimonium chloride are: guar hydroxypropyltrimonium chloride which has a charge density of about 1.1 meq/g and a weight average molecular weight of about 500,000 g/mol is available from ASI, a charge density of about 1.5 meq/g and a weight average molecular weight of about 500,000 g/mole is available from ASI. Other suitable guar hydroxypropyltrimonium chloride are: Hi-Care 1000, which has a charge density of about 0.7 meq/g and a Weight average molecular weight of about 600,000 g/mole and is available from Rhodia; N-Hance™ 3269 and N-Hance™ 3270, which has a charge density of about 0.7 meq/g and a weight average molecular weight of about 425,000 g/mol and is available from ASI, N-Hance™ 3271 which has a charge density of about 0.7 meq/g and a weight average molecular weight of about 500,000 g/mol and is available from Ashland™; AquaCat™ CG518 has a charge density of about 0.9 meq/g and a Weight average molecular weight of about 50,000 g/mol and is available from ASI. BF-13, which is a borate (boron) free guar of charge density of about 1.1 meq/g and weight average molecular weight of about 800,000 and BF-17, which is a borate (boron) free guar of charge density of about 1.7 meq/g and M. W.t of about 800,000 both available from ASI.
Other suitable guar hydroxypropyltrimonium chloride are: N-Hance™ CG17 has a charge density of about 1.0 meq/g and a weight average molecular weight of about 1,600,000 g/mol and is available from Ashland™; and N-Hance™ 3196 has a charge density of about 0.7 meq/g and a weight average molecular weight of 1,700,000 g/mol and is available from Ashland™.
The shampoo compositions may comprise a galactomannan polymer derivative having a mannose to galactose ratio of greater than 2:1 on a monomer to monomer basis, the galactomannan polymer derivative selected from the group consisting of a cationic galactomannan polymer derivative and an amphoteric galactomannan polymer derivative having a net positive charge. As used herein, the term “cationic galactomannan” refers to a galactomannan polymer to which a cationic group is added. The term “amphoteric galactomannan” refers to a galactomannan polymer to which a cationic group and an anionic group are added such that the polymer has a net positive charge.
Galactomannan polymers are present in the endosperm of seeds of the Leguminosae family. Galactomannan polymers are made up of a combination of mannose monomers and galactose monomers. The galactomannan molecule is a straight chain mannan branched at regular intervals with single membered galactose units on specific mannose units. The mannose units are linked to each other by means of β (1-4) glycosidic linkages. The galactose branching arises by way of an α (1-6) linkage. The ratio of mannose monomers to galactose monomers varies according to the species of the plant and also is affected by climate. Non-Guar Galactomannan polymer derivatives suitable for use can have a ratio of mannose to galactose of greater than 2:1 on a monomer to monomer basis. Suitable ratios of mannose to galactose can be greater than about 3:1, and the ratio of mannose to galactose can be greater than about 4:1. Analysis of mannose to galactose ratios is well known in the art and is typically based on the measurement of the galactose content.
The gum for use in preparing the non-guar galactomannan polymer derivatives is typically obtained as naturally occurring material such as seeds or beans from plants. Examples of various non-guar galactomannan polymers include but are not limited to Tara gum (3 parts mannose/1 part galactose), Locust bean or Carob (4 parts mannose/1 part galactose), and Cassia gum (5 parts mannose/1 part galactose).
The non-guar galactomannan polymer derivatives can have a M. Wt. from about 1,000 to about 1,000,000, and/or form about 5,000 to about 900,000.
The shampoo compositions of the can also include galactomannan polymer derivatives which have a cationic charge density from about 0.5 meq/g to about 7 meq/g. The galactomannan polymer derivatives can have a cationic charge density from about 1 meq/g to about 5 meq/g. The degree of substitution of the cationic groups onto the galactomannan structure should be sufficient to provide the requisite cationic charge density.
The galactomannan polymer derivative can be a cationic derivative of the non-guar galactomannan polymer, which is obtained by reaction between the hydroxyl groups of the polygalactomannan polymer and reactive quaternary ammonium compounds. Suitable quaternary ammonium compounds for use in forming the cationic galactomannan polymer derivatives include those conforming to the general formulas 1-5, as defined above.
Cationic non-guar galactomannan polymer derivatives formed from the reagents described above are represented by the general formula 6:
wherein R is the gum. The cationic galactomannan derivative can be a gum hydroxypropyltrimethylammonium chloride, which can be more specifically represented by the general formula 7:
Alternatively, the galactomannan polymer derivative can be an amphoteric galactomannan polymer derivative having a net positive charge, obtained when the cationic galactomannan polymer derivative further comprises an anionic group.
The cationic non-guar galactomannan can have a ratio of mannose to galactose is greater than about 4:1, a weight average molecular weight of about 50,000 g/mol to about 1,000,000 g/mol, and/or from about 100,000 g/mol to about 900,000 g/mol and a cationic charge density from about 1 meq/g to about 5 meq/g, and/or from 2 meq/g to about 4 meq/g and can also be derived from a cassia plant.
The shampoo compositions can comprise at least about 0.05% of a galactomannan polymer derivative by weight of the composition, alternatively from about 0.05% to about 2%, by weight of the composition, of a galactomannan polymer derivative.
The shampoo compositions can comprise water-soluble cationically modified starch polymers. As used herein, the term “cationically modified starch” refers to a starch to which a cationic group is added prior to degradation of the starch to a smaller molecular weight, or wherein a cationic group is added after modification of the starch to achieve a desired molecular weight. The definition of the term “cationically modified starch” also includes amphoterically modified starch. The term “amphoterically modified starch” refers to a starch hydrolysate to which a cationic group and an anionic group are added.
The shampoo compositions can comprise cationically modified starch polymers at a range of about 0.01% to about 10%, and/or from about 0.05% to about 5%, by weight of the composition.
The cationically modified starch polymers disclosed herein have a percent of bound nitrogen of from about 0.5% to about 4%.
The cationically modified starch polymers for use in the shampoo compositions can have a weight average molecular weight about 50,000 g/mol to about 1,000,000 g/mol and/or from about 100,000 g/mol to about 1,000,000 g/mol.
The shampoo compositions can include cationically modified starch polymers which have a charge density of from about 0.2 meq/g to about 5 meq/g, and/or from about 0.2 meq/g to about 2 meq/g. The chemical modification to obtain such a charge density includes, but is not limited to, the addition of amino and/or ammonium groups into the starch molecules. Non-limiting examples of these ammonium groups may include substituents such as hydroxypropyl trimmonium chloride, trimethylhydroxypropyl ammonium chloride, dimethylstearylhydroxypropyl ammonium chloride, and dimethyldodecylhydroxypropyl ammonium chloride. See Solarek, D. B., Cationic Starches in Modified Starches: Properties and Uses, Wurzburg, O. B., Ed., CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton, Fla. 1986, pp 113-125. The cationic groups may be added to the starch prior to degradation to a smaller molecular weight or the cationic groups may be added after such modification.
The cationically modified starch polymers generally have a degree of substitution of a cationic group from about 0.2 to about 2.5. As used herein, the “degree of substitution” of the cationically modified starch polymers is an average measure of the number of hydroxyl groups on each anhydroglucose unit which is derivatized by substituent groups. Since each anhydroglucose unit has three potential hydroxyl groups available for substitution, the maximum possible degree of substitution is 3. The degree of substitution is expressed as the number of moles of substituent groups per mole of anhydroglucose unit, on a molar average basis. The degree of substitution may be determined using proton nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (“.sup.1H NMR”) methods well known in the art. Suitable .sup.1H NMR techniques include those described in “Observation on NMR Spectra of Starches in Dimethyl Sulfoxide, Iodine-Complexing, and Solvating in Water-Dimethyl Sulfoxide”, Qin-Ji Peng and Arthur S. Perlin, Carbohydrate Research, 160 (1987), 57-72; and “An Approach to the Structural Analysis of Oligosaccharides by NMR Spectroscopy”, J. Howard Bradbury and J. Grant Collins, Carbohydrate Research, 71, (1979), 15-25.
The source of starch before chemical modification can be chosen from a variety of sources such as tubers, legumes, cereal, and grains. Non-limiting examples of this source starch may include corn starch, wheat starch, rice starch, waxy corn starch, oat starch, cassaya starch, waxy barley, waxy rice starch, glutenous rice starch, sweet rice starch, amioca, potato starch, tapioca starch, oat starch, sago starch, sweet rice, or mixtures thereof.
The cationically modified starch polymers can be selected from degraded cationic maize starch, cationic tapioca, cationic potato starch, and mixtures thereof. Alternatively, the cationically modified starch polymers are cationic corn starch and cationic tapioca.
The starch, prior to degradation or after modification to a smaller molecular weight, may comprise one or more additional modifications. For example, these modifications may include cross-linking, stabilization reactions, phosphorylations, and hydrolyzations. Stabilization reactions may include alkylation and esterification.
The cationically modified starch polymers may be incorporated into the composition in the form of hydrolyzed starch (e.g., acid, enzyme, or alkaline degradation), oxidized starch (e.g., peroxide, peracid, hypochlorite, alkaline, or any other oxidizing agent), physically/mechanically degraded starch (e.g., via the thermo-mechanical energy input of the processing equipment), or combinations thereof.
An optimal form of the starch is one which is readily soluble in water and forms a substantially clear (% Transmittance.gtoreq.80 at 600 nm) solution in water. The transparency of the composition is measured by Ultra-Violet/Visible (UV/VIS) spectrophotometry, which determines the absorption or transmission of UV/VIS light by a sample, using a Gretag Macbeth Colorimeter Color i 5 according to the related instructions. A light wavelength of 600 nm has been shown to be adequate for characterizing the degree of clarity of cosmetic compositions.
Suitable cationically modified starch for use in shampoo compositions are available from known starch suppliers. Also suitable for use in shampoo compositions are nonionic modified starch that can be further derivatized to a cationically modified starch as is known in the art. Other suitable modified starch starting materials may be quaternized, as is known in the art, to produce the cationically modified starch polymer suitable for use in shampoo compositions.
Starch Degradation Procedure: a starch slurry can be prepared by mixing granular starch in water. The temperature is raised to about 35° C. An aqueous solution of potassium permanganate is then added at a concentration of about 50 ppm based on starch. The pH is raised to about 11.5 with sodium hydroxide and the slurry is stirred sufficiently to prevent settling of the starch. Then, about a 30% solution of hydrogen peroxide diluted in water is added to a level of about 1% of peroxide based on starch. The pH of about 11.5 is then restored by adding additional sodium hydroxide. The reaction is completed over about a 1 to about 20 hour period. The mixture is then neutralized with dilute hydrochloric acid. The degraded starch is recovered by filtration followed by washing and drying.
The shampoo composition can comprise a cationic copolymer of an acrylamide monomer and a cationic monomer, wherein the copolymer has a charge density of from about 1.0 meq/g to about 3.0 meq/g. The cationic copolymer can be a synthetic cationic copolymer of acrylamide monomers and cationic monomers.
The cationic copolymer can comprise:
where k=1, each of v, v′, and v″ is independently an integer of from 1 to 6, w is zero or an integer of from 1 to 10, and X− is an anion.
The cationic monomer can conform to Formula CM and where k=1, v=3 and w=0, z=1 and X− is Cl− to form the following structure:
The above structure may be referred to as diquat. Alternatively, the cationic monomer can conform to Formula CM and wherein v and v″ are each 3, v′=1, w=1, y=1 and X− is Cl−, such as:
The above structure may be referred to as triquat.
Suitable acrylamide monomer can include, but are not limited to, either acrylamide or methacrylamide.
The cationic copolymer can be of an acrylamide monomer and a cationic monomer, wherein the cationic monomer is selected from the group consisting of: dimethylaminoethyl (meth)acrylate, dimethylaminopropyl (meth)acrylate, ditertiobutylaminoethyl (meth)acrylate, dimethylaminomethyl (meth)acrylamide, dimethylaminopropyl (meth)acrylamide; ethylenimine, vinylamine, 2-vinylpyridine, 4-vinylpyridine; trimethylammonium ethyl (meth)acrylate chloride, trimethylammonium ethyl (meth)acrylate methyl sulphate, dimethylammonium ethyl (meth)acrylate benzyl chloride, 4-benzoylbenzyl dimethylammonium ethyl acrylate chloride, trimethyl ammonium ethyl (meth)acrylamido chloride, trimethyl ammonium propyl (meth)acrylamido chloride, vinylbenzyl trimethyl ammonium chloride, diallyldimethyl ammonium chloride, and mixtures thereof.
The cationic copolymer can comprise a cationic monomer selected from the group consisting of: cationic monomers include trimethylammonium ethyl (meth)acrylate chloride, trimethylammonium ethyl (meth)acrylate methyl sulphate, dimethylammonium ethyl (meth)acrylate benzyl chloride, 4-benzoylbenzyl dimethylammonium ethyl acrylate chloride, trimethyl ammonium ethyl (meth)acrylamido chloride, trimethyl ammonium propyl (meth)acrylamido chloride, vinylbenzyl trimethyl ammonium chloride, and mixtures thereof.
The cationic copolymer can be water-soluble. The cationic copolymer is formed from (1) copolymers of (meth)acrylamide and cationic monomers based on (meth)acrylamide, and/or hydrolysis-stable cationic monomers, (2) terpolymers of (meth)acrylamide, monomers based on cationic (meth)acrylic acid esters, and monomers based on (meth)acrylamide, and/or hydrolysis-stable cationic monomers. Monomers based on cationic (meth)acrylic acid esters may be cationized esters of the (meth)acrylic acid containing a quaternized N atom. The cationized esters of the (meth)acrylic acid containing a quaternized N atom can be quaternized dialkylaminoalkyl (meth)acrylates with C1 to C3 in the alkyl and alkylene groups. Suitable cationized esters of the (meth)acrylic acid containing a quaternized N atom can be selected from the group consisting of: ammonium salts of dimethylaminomethyl (meth)acrylate, dimethylaminoethyl (meth)acrylate, dimethylaminopropyl (meth)acrylate, diethylaminomethyl (meth)acrylate, diethylaminoethyl (meth)acrylate; and diethylaminopropyl (meth)acrylate quaternized with methyl chloride. The cationized esters of the (meth)acrylic acid containing a quaternized N atom can be dimethylaminoethyl acrylate, which is quaternized with an alkyl halide, or with methyl chloride or benzyl chloride or dimethyl sulfate (ADAME-Quat). The cationic monomer when based on (meth)acrylamides can be quaternized dialkylaminoalkyl(meth)acrylamides with C1 to C3 in the alkyl and alkylene groups, or dimethylaminopropylacrylamide, which is quaternized with an alkyl halide, or methyl chloride or benzyl chloride or dimethyl sulfate.
Suitable cationic monomer based on a (meth)acrylamide include quaternized dialkylaminoalkyl(meth)acrylamide with C1 to C3 in the alkyl and alkylene groups. The cationic monomer based on a (meth)acrylamide can be dimethylaminopropylacrylamide, which is quaternized with an alkyl halide, especially methyl chloride or benzyl chloride or dimethyl sulfate.
The cationic monomer can be a hydrolysis-stable cationic monomer. Hydrolysis-stable cationic monomers can be, in addition to a dialkylaminoalkyl(meth)acrylamide, all monomers that can be regarded as stable to the OECD hydrolysis test. The cationic monomer can be hydrolysis-stable and the hydrolysis-stable cationic monomer can be selected from the group consisting of: diallyldimethylammonium chloride and water-soluble, cationic styrene derivatives.
The cationic copolymer can be a terpolymer of acrylamide, 2-dimethylammoniumethyl (meth)acrylate quaternized with methyl chloride (ADAME-Q) and 3-dimethylammoniumpropyl(meth)acrylamide quaternized with methyl chloride (DIMAPA-Q). The cationic copolymer can be formed from acrylamide and acrylamidopropyltrimethylammonium chloride, wherein the acrylamidopropyltrimethylammonium chloride has a charge density of from about 1.0 meq/g to about 3.0 meq/g.
The cationic copolymer can have a charge density of from about 1.1 meq/g to about 2.5 meq/g, or from about 1.1 meq/g to about 2.3 meq/g, or from about 1.2 meq/g to about 2.2 meq/g, or from about 1.2 meq/g to about 2.1 meq/g, or from about 1.3 meq/g to about 2.0 meq/g, or from about 1.3 meq/g to about 1.9 meq/g.
The cationic copolymer can have a weight average molecular weight from about 10 thousand g/mol to about 1 million g/mol, or from about 25 thousand g/mol to about 1 million g/mol, or from about 50 thousand g/mol to about 1 million g/mol, or from about 100 thousand g/mol to about 1.0 million g/mol, or from about 150 thousand g/mol to about 1.0 million g/mol.
Cationic Synthetic Polymers
The shampoo composition can comprise a cationic synthetic polymer that may be formed from
i) one or more cationic monomer units, and optionally
ii) one or more monomer units bearing a negative charge, and/or
iii) a nonionic monomer,
wherein the subsequent charge of the copolymer is positive. The ratio of the three types of monomers is given by “m”, “p” and “q” where “m” is the number of cationic monomers, “p” is the number of monomers bearing a negative charge and “q” is the number of nonionic monomers
The cationic polymers can be water soluble or dispersible, non-crosslinked, and synthetic cationic polymers having the following structure:
where A, may be one or more of the following cationic moieties:
where @=amido, alkylamido, ester, ether, alkyl or alkylaryl;
where Y=C1-C22 alkyl, alkoxy, alkylidene, alkyl or aryloxy;
where ψ=C1-C22 alkyl, alkyloxy, alkyl aryl or alkyl arylox;
where Z=C1-C22 alkyl, alkyloxy, aryl or aryloxy;
where R1=H, C1-C4 linear or branched alkyl;
where s=0 or 1, n=0 or ≥1;
where T and R7=C1-C22 alkyl; and
where X—=halogen, hydroxide, alkoxide, sulfate or alkylsulfate.
Where the monomer bearing a negative charge is defined by R2′=H, C1-C4 linear or branched alkyl and R3 as:
where D=O, N, or S;
where Q=NH2 or O;
where u=1-6;
where t=0-1; and
where J=oxygenated functional group containing the following elements P, S, C.
Where the nonionic monomer is defined by R2″=H, C1-C4 linear or branched alkyl, R6=linear or branched alkyl, alkyl aryl, aryl oxy, alkyloxy, alkylaryl oxy and β is defined as
and
where G′ and G″ are, independently of one another, O, S or N—H and L=0 or 1.
Examples of cationic monomers include aminoalkyl (meth)acrylates, (meth)aminoalkyl (meth)acrylamides; monomers comprising at least one secondary, tertiary or quaternary amine function, or a heterocyclic group containing a nitrogen atom, vinylamine or ethylenimine; diallyldialkyl ammonium salts; their mixtures, their salts, and macromonomers deriving from therefrom.
Further examples of cationic monomers include dimethylaminoethyl (meth)acrylate, dimethylaminopropyl (meth)acrylate, ditertiobutylaminoethyl (meth)acrylate, dimethylaminomethyl (meth)acrylamide, dimethylaminopropyl (meth)acrylamide, ethylenimine, vinylamine, 2-vinylpyridine, 4-vinylpyridine, trimethylammonium ethyl (meth)acrylate chloride, trimethylammonium ethyl (meth)acrylate methyl sulphate, dimethylammonium ethyl (meth)acrylate benzyl chloride, 4-benzoylbenzyl dimethylammonium ethyl acrylate chloride, trimethyl ammonium ethyl (meth)acrylamido chloride, trimethyl ammonium propyl (meth)acrylamido chloride, vinylbenzyl trimethyl ammonium chloride, diallyldimethyl ammonium chloride.
Suitable cationic monomers include those which comprise a quaternary ammonium group of formula —NR3+, wherein R, which is identical or different, represents a hydrogen atom, an alkyl group comprising 1 to 10 carbon atoms, or a benzyl group, optionally carrying a hydroxyl group, and comprise an anion (counter-ion). Examples of anions are halides such as chlorides, bromides, sulphates, hydrosulphates, alkylsulphates (for example comprising 1 to 6 carbon atoms), phosphates, citrates, formates, and acetates.
Suitable cationic monomers include trimethylammonium ethyl (meth)acrylate chloride, trimethylammonium ethyl (meth)acrylate methyl sulphate, dimethylammonium ethyl (meth)acrylate benzyl chloride, 4-benzoylbenzyl dimethylammonium ethyl acrylate chloride, trimethyl ammonium ethyl (meth)acrylamido chloride, trimethyl ammonium propyl (meth)acrylamido chloride, vinylbenzyl trimethyl ammonium chloride.
Additional suitable cationic monomers include trimethyl ammonium propyl (meth)acrylamido chloride.
Examples of monomers bearing a negative charge include alpha ethylenically unsaturated monomers comprising a phosphate or phosphonate group, alpha ethylenically unsaturated monocarboxylic acids, monoalkylesters of alpha ethylenically unsaturated dicarboxylic acids, monoalkylamides of alpha ethylenically unsaturated dicarboxylic acids, alpha ethylenically unsaturated compounds comprising a sulphonic acid group, and salts of alpha ethylenically unsaturated compounds comprising a sulphonic acid group.
Suitable monomers with a negative charge include acrylic acid, methacrylic acid, vinyl sulphonic acid, salts of vinyl sulfonic acid, vinylbenzene sulphonic acid, salts of vinylbenzene sulphonic acid, alpha-acrylamidomethylpropanesulphonic acid, salts of alpha-acrylamidomethylpropanesulphonic acid, 2-sulphoethyl methacrylate, salts of 2-sulphoethyl methacrylate, acrylamido-2-methylpropanesulphonic acid (AMPS), salts of acrylamido-2-methylpropanesulphonic acid, and styrenesulphonate (SS).
Examples of nonionic monomers include vinyl acetate, amides of alpha ethylenically unsaturated carboxylic acids, esters of an alpha ethylenically unsaturated monocarboxylic acids with an hydrogenated or fluorinated alcohol, polyethylene oxide (meth)acrylate (i.e. polyethoxylated (meth)acrylic acid), monoalkylesters of alpha ethylenically unsaturated dicarboxylic acids, monoalkylamides of alpha ethylenically unsaturated dicarboxylic acids, vinyl nitriles, vinylamine amides, vinyl alcohol, vinyl pyrolidone, and vinyl aromatic compounds.
Suitable nonionic monomers include styrene, acrylamide, methacrylamide, acrylonitrile, methylacrylate, ethylacrylate, n-propylacrylate, n-butylacrylate, methylmethacrylate, ethylmethacrylate, n-propylmethacrylate, n-butylmethacrylate, 2-ethyl-hexyl acrylate, 2-ethyl-hexyl methacrylate, 2-hydroxyethylacrylate and 2-hydroxyethylmethacrylate.
The anionic counterion (X—) in association with the synthetic cationic polymers may be any known counterion so long as the polymers remain soluble or dispersible in water, in the shampoo composition, or in a coacervate phase of the shampoo composition, and so long as the counterions are physically and chemically compatible with the essential components of the shampoo composition or do not otherwise unduly impair product performance, stability or aesthetics. Non-limiting examples of such counterions include halides (e.g., chlorine, fluorine, bromine, iodine), sulfate and methylsulfate.
The concentration of the cationic polymers ranges about 0.025% to about 5%, from about 0.1% to about 3%, and/or from about 0.2% to about 1%, by weight of the shampoo composition.
Suitable cationic cellulose polymers are salts of hydroxyethyl cellulose reacted with trimethyl ammonium substituted epoxide, referred to in the industry (CTFA) as Polyquatemium 10 and available from Dow/Amerchol Corp. (Edison, N.J., USA) in their Polymer LR, JR, and KG series of polymers. Other suitable types of cationic cellulose include the polymeric quaternary ammonium salts of hydroxyethyl cellulose reacted with lauryl dimethyl ammonium-substituted epoxide referred to in the industry (CTFA) as Polyquaternium 24. These materials are available from Dow/Amerchol Corp. under the tradename Polymer LM-200. Other suitable types of cationic cellulose include the polymeric quaternary ammonium salts of hydroxyethyl cellulose reacted with lauryl dimethyl ammonium-substituted epoxide and trimethyl ammonium substituted epoxide referred to in the industry (CTFA) as Polyquaternium 67. These materials are available from Dow/Amerchol Corp. under the tradename SoftCAT Polymer SL-5, SoftCAT Polymer SL-30, Polymer SL-60, Polymer SL-100, Polymer SK-L, Polymer SK-M, Polymer SK-MH, and Polymer SK-H.
Anti-Dandruff Actives
Anti-dandruff agents suitable for use in foamed shampoo compositions include pyridinethione salts, azoles (e.g., ketoconazole, econazole, and elubiol), selenium sulfide, particulate sulfur, salicylic acid, and mixtures thereof. A typical anti-dandruff agent is pyridinethione salt. shampoo compositions can also include a zinc-containing layered material. An example of a zinc-containing layered material can include zinc carbonate materials. Of these, zinc carbonate and pyridinethione salts (particularly zinc pyridinethione or “ZPT) are common in the composition, and often present together.
Emulsifiers
A variety of anionic and nonionic emulsifiers can be used in the foamed shampoo compositions. The anionic and nonionic emulsifiers can be either monomeric or polymeric in nature. Monomeric examples include, by way of illustrating and not limitation, alkyl ethoxylates, alkyl sulfates, soaps, and fatty esters and their derivatives. Polymeric examples include, by way of illustrating and not limitation, polyacrylates, polyethylene glycols, and block copolymers and their derivatives. Naturally occurring emulsifiers such as lanolins, lecithin and lignin and their derivatives are also non-limiting examples of useful emulsifiers.
Chelating Agents
The foamed shampoo composition can also comprise a chelant. Suitable chelants include those listed in A E Martell & R M Smith, Critical Stability Constants, Vol. 1, Plenum Press, New York & London (1974) and A E Martell & R D Hancock, Metal Complexes in Aqueous Solution, Plenum Press, New York & London (1996) both incorporated herein by reference. When related to chelants, the term “salts and derivatives thereof” means the salts and derivatives comprising the same functional structure (e.g., same chemical backbone) as the chelant they are referring to and that have similar or better chelating properties. This term can include alkali metal, alkaline earth, ammonium, substituted ammonium (i.e. monoethanolammonium, diethanolammonium, triethanolammonium) salts, esters of chelants having an acidic moiety and mixtures thereof, in particular all sodium, potassium or ammonium salts. The term “derivatives” also includes “chelating surfactant” compounds, such as those exemplified in U.S. Pat. No. 5,284,972, and large molecules comprising one or more chelating groups having the same functional structure as the parent chelants, such as polymeric EDDS (ethylenediaminedisuccinic acid) disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,747,440.
Levels of the EDDS chelant in the foamed shampoo compositions can be as low as about 0.01 wt % or even as high as about 10 wt %, but above the higher level (i.e., 10 wt %) formulation and/or human safety concerns may arise. The level of the EDDS chelant may be at least about 0.05 wt %, at least about 0.1 wt %, at least about 0.25 wt %, at least about 0.5 wt %, at least about 1 wt %, or at least about 2 wt % of the foamed shampoo composition. Levels above about 4 wt % can be used but may not result in additional benefit.
Aqueous Carrier
The foamed shampoo compositions can be in the form of pourable liquids (under ambient conditions). Such compositions will therefore typically comprise a carrier, which is present at a level of from about 40% to about 80%, alternatively from about 45% to about 75%, alternatively from about 50% to about 70%, by weight, of the foamed shampoo composition. The carrier may comprise water, or a miscible mixture of water and organic solvent, and in one aspect may comprise water with minimal or no significant concentrations of organic solvent, except as otherwise incidentally incorporated into the composition as minor ingredients of other essential or optional components.
Carriers useful in the foamed shampoo compositions include water and water solutions of lower alkyl alcohols and polyhydric alcohols. The lower alkyl alcohols useful herein are monohydric alcohols having 1 to 6 carbons, in one aspect, ethanol and isopropanol. Exemplary polyhydric alcohols useful herein include propylene glycol, hexylene glycol, glycerin, and propane diol.
Dosage of Foam
The compact shampoo composition can be dispensed from a foamer, such as an aerosol or pump foamer, as a dosage of foam. The dosage of foam can have a volume of from about 5 cm3 to about 500 cm3, alternatively from about 5 cm3 to about 450 cm3, alternatively from about 10 cm3 to about 400 cm3, alternatively from about 10 cm3 to about 350 cm3, alternatively from about 10 cm3 to about 300 cm3, alternatively from about 20 cm3 to about 250 cm3, alternatively from about 20 cm3 to about 200 cm3, alternatively from about 20 cm3 to about 150 cm3, and alternatively from about 20 cm3 to about 100 cm3.
The dosage of foam can comprise from about 0.5 g to about 20 g, alternatively from about 0.5 g to about 18 g, alternatively from about 0.5 g to about 16 g, alternatively from about 0.5 g to about 15 g, alternatively from about 1 g to about 15 g, alternatively from about 1 g to about 15 g, alternatively from about 1 g to about 12 g, alternatively from about 2 g to about 12 g, alternatively from about 2 g to about 10 g, alternatively from about 2.5 g to about 10 g, alternatively from about 3 g to about 9 g, alternatively from about 3 g to about 8 g of a detersive surfactant by weight of the foam.
The dosage of foam can also comprise from about 0.0001 g to about 5 g, alternatively from about 0.001 g to about 5 g, alternatively from about 0.001 g to about 4 g, alternatively from about 0.01 g to about 4 g, alternatively from about 0.05 g to about 3 g, alternatively from about 0.1 to about 2 g, alternatively from about 0.075 g to about 2 g propellant, by weight of the foam, alternatively from about 0.05 g to about 1 g, and alternatively from about 0.05 g to about 0.5 g.
The dosage of foam can also have a foam density of from about 0.010 g/cm3 to about 0.50 g/cm3; alternatively from about 0.02 g/cm3 to about 0.40 g/cm3; and alternatively from about 0.03 g/cm3 to about 0.35 g/cm3.
The dosage of foam can also have a bubble size distribution comprising an R32 of from about 1 μm to about 500 μm, alternatively from about 5 μm to about 300 μm, alternatively from about 10 μm to about 200 μm; and alternatively from about 20 μm to about 100 μm.
The dosage of foam can have a yield point of from about 5 Pa to about 100 Pa, alternatively from about 8 Pa to about 80 Pa, alternatively from about 8 Pa to about 60 Pa, and alternatively from about 10 Pa to about 50 Pa.
The dosage of foam can comprise from about 0.00005 g to about 0.5 g of a cationic deposition polymer by weight of the foam.
Foam Dispenser
Referring to
Referring to
A valve assembly 28, in turn, may be disposed within the valve cup 26. The valve assembly 28 provides for retention of shampoo composition 42 within the aerosol dispenser 20 until the shampoo composition 42 is selectively dispensed by a user. The valve assembly 28 may be selectively actuated by an actuator 30. Selective actuation of the valve assembly 28 allows the user to dispense a desired quantity of the shampoo composition 42 on demand. The shampoo composition can be dispensed as a foam.
Inside the outer container 22 may be a product delivery device. The product delivery device may comprise a collapsible bag 32 which can be made of gas impermeable material as shown in
The collapsible bag 32 may hold shampoo composition 42 therein and prevent intermixing of such shampoo composition 42 with propellant 40, which can also be referred to as driving gas. The propellant 40 may be stored outside the collapsible bag 32, and inside the outer container 22. The propellant may be any gas as long as it does not excessively penetrate the walls of the collapsible bag 32 or outer container 22 thus maintaining the performance of the product and dispensing acceptable during its usable life.
The shampoo composition 42 may include a propellant, which can also be referred to as a foaming or blooming agent. If a blooming agent is used with the composition 42, the pressure in the outer container 22 can be greater than the vapor pressure of the blooming agent, so that shampoo composition 42 may be dispensed from within the bag.
After the collapsible bag has been filled with the composition, the outer container may be pressurized from about 40 to about 160 psig, from about 50 to about 140 psig, from about 60 to about 90 psig (all measured at RT). In any case, the equilibrium pressure measured at a certain temperature cannot exceed the maximum allowable pressure of the container per the applicable local transport and safety regulations.
The product delivery device may alternatively or additionally comprise a dip tube 34 as shown in
The product delivery device may be an aerosol pump dispenser and may not contain a dip tube or a collapsible bag, for instance, an inverted aerosol container.
The pressure of the propellant 40 within the outer container 22 provides for dispensing of the shampoo composition 42/co-dispensing of shampoo composition 42/propellant 40 to ambient, and optionally to a target surface. The target surface may include a surface to be cleaned or treated by the shampoo composition 42, hair, scalp, etc. Such dispensing occurs in response to the user actuating the valve assembly 28.
The outer container may be pressurized from about 20 to about 110 psig, more preferably from about 30 to about 90 psig, still more preferably from about 40 to about 70 psig (all measured after filling to the intended level at RT). In any case, the equilibrium pressure measured at a certain temperature cannot exceed the maximum allowable pressure of the container per the applicable local transport and safety regulations.
Referring to
Alternatively, the hair composition can be stored and dispensed from a mechanical foam dispenser. Non-limiting examples of suitable pump dispensers include those described in WO 2004/078903, WO 2004/078901, and WO 2005/078063 and may be supplied by Albea (60 Electric Ave., Thomaston, Conn. 06787 USA) or Rieke Packaging Systems (500 West Seventh St., Auburn, Ind. 46706). The composition can be substantially free of propellant.
Alternatively, the composition can be stored and dispensed from a squeeze foam dispenser. An example of squeeze foamer is EZ'R available from Albéa.
Foaming Agent
The shampoo composition described herein may comprise from about from about 3% to about 20% propellant or foaming agent, alternatively from about 3% to about 18% propellant or foaming agent, alternatively from about 3% to about 15% propellant or foaming agent, alternatively from about 3% to about 12% propellant or foaming agent, alternatively from about 4% to about 10% propellant or foaming agent, and alternatively from about 5% to about 8% propellant or foaming agent, by weight of the shampoo composition.
A propellant or foaming agent can be added to the shampoo composition described herein at a composition to propellant weight ratio of from about 3:17 to about 49:1; alternatively from about 9:1 to about 97:3; and alternatively from about 23:2 to about 24:1 to create a pressurized composition.
Trans-1,3,3,3-tetrafluoroprop-1-ene (“HFO”) (Solstice® Propellant HFO-1234ze available by Honeywell) can be used as a foaming agent within shampoo formulations.
When used as a foaming agent Trans-1,3,3,3-tetrafluoroprop-1-ene has been found to have unique advantages over the use of low vapor pressure hydrocarbon foaming agents (such as commonly used A46 which is a mixture of 84.8% isobutane and 15.2% propane) in that it enables significantly higher foam densities (approximately 2× greater) versus hydrobarbon propellants and at equal formula pressure and formula % saturated pressure. The higher density enables higher gravimetric foam dosage per unit volume of the resulting dispensed foam shampoo and making it easier to achieve sufficient dosage from a low-density foam shampoo form relative to a high density liquid shampoo form. The pressure and % saturated pressure is important to enable sufficient foam dispensing over the life of the product (from beginning to middle to end of the pressurized container). The Trans-1,3,3,3-tetrafluoroprop-1-ene has been found to result in gloss or shine of the dispensed foam.
The foaming agent/propellant for use in the shampoo composition described herein can be selected from the group consisting of hydrofluoroolefins (HFOs) such as cis- and/or trans-1,3,3,3-tetrafluoropropene (HFO-1234ze), particularly the trans isomer, 3,3,3-trifluoropropene (HFO-1243zf), 2,3,3,3-tetrafluoropropene (HFO 1234yf), 1,2,3,3,3-pentafluoropropene (HFO-1225ye), and mixtures thereof.
The foaming agent/propellant for use in the shampoo composition described herein can be selected from the group consisting of halogenated alkenes of generic formula that would include numerous HFOs and HCFOs. In addition, the foaming agent/propellants listed can be mixed with one or more hydrofluoroolefins, hydrochlorofluoroolefins, hydrofluorocarbons, chlorofluorocarbons, hydrocarbons, alkyl ethers, and compressed gases.
The foaming agent/propellant for use in the shampoo composition described herein can be selected from the group consisting of halogenated alkenes of generic formula that would include numerous HFOs and HCFOs. In addition, the foaming agent/propellants listed can be mixed with one or more hydrofluoroolefins, hydrochlorofluoroolefins, hydrofluorocarbons, chlorofluorocarbons, hydrocarbons, alkyl ethers, and compressed gases.
The foaming agent/propellant for use in the shampoo composition described herein can be selected from the group consisting of hydrochlorofluoroolefins (HCFOs) such as cis and/or trans-1-chloro-3,3,3-trifluoropropene (HCFO-1233zd), particularly the trans isomer, 2-chloro-3,3,3-trifluoropropene (HCFO-1233xf), 1,1-dicloro-3,3,3-trifluoropropene, 1,2-dichloro-3,3,3-trifluoropropene, and mixtures thereof.
The foaming agent/propellant for use in the shampoo composition described herein can be selected from the group consisting of chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) such as dichlorodifluoromethane, 1,1-dichloro-1,1,2,2-tetrafluoroethane, 1-chloro-1,1-difluoro-2,2-trifluoroethane, 1-chloro-1,1-difluoroethylene, monochlorodifluoromethane and mixtures thereof; The foaming agent/propellant suitable for use in the shampoo composition can be selected from the group consisting of chemically-inert hydrocarbons such as propane, n-butane, isobutane, n-pentane, isopentane, and mixtures thereof; compressed gases such as carbon dioxide, nitrous oxide, nitrogen, compressed air, and mixtures thereof; and mixtures of one or more hydrocarbons and compressed gases. In an embodiment, the foaming agent can comprise a blend of hydrocarbons such as isobutane, propane, and butane including, but not limited to, hydrocarbon blend A-46 (15.2% propane, 84.8% isobutane), hydrocarbon blend NP-46 (25.9% propane, 74.1% n-butane), hydrocarbon blend NIP-46 (21.9% propane, 31.3% isobutane, 46.8% n-butane), and other non-limiting hydrocarbon blends designated as A-31, NP-31, NIP-31, A-70, NP-70, NIP-70, A-85, NP-85, A-108. In an embodiment, the foaming agent can include compressed gases including, but not limited to, carbon dioxide and nitrous oxide.
The foaming agent for use in the shampoo composition can be the hydrocarbon blend A-46 (15.2% propane, 84.8% isobutane).
Perfume
The shampoo composition may comprise from about 0.5% to about 7%, alternatively from about 1% to about 6%, and alternatively from about 2% to about 5% perfume, by weight of the shampoo composition.
The shampoo composition may have a silicone to perfume ratio of from 1:1 to about 19:1, alternatively from about 3:2 to about 9:1, alternatively from about 7:3 to about 17:3.
Examples of suitable perfumes may be provided in the CTFA (Cosmetic, Toiletry and Fragrance Association) 1992 International Buyers Guide, published by CFTA Publications and OPD 1993 Chemicals Buyers Directory 80th Annual Edition, published by Schnell Publishing Co. A plurality of perfume components may be present in the shampoo composition.
The method of treating the hair described herein comprises (1) wetting the hair; (2) providing a shampoo composition, as described herein, (3) dispensing the shampoo composition as a liquid form or a foam form, where the foam form is dispensed from a mechanical foam dispenser or an aerosol dispenser; (4) applying the composition to the wet hair; (5) massaging the shampoo composition into wet hair and optionally forming a lather; (5) rinsing the composition from the hair; and (5) optionally repeating steps (2)-(4); and (6) optionally applying a conditioning composition where the conditioning composition can be liquid or can be dispensed as a foam from an mechanical foam dispenser or an aerosol dispenser and the conditioning composition can contain the silicone described herein.
The following examples illustrate the shampoo composition described herein. The exemplified compositions can be prepared by conventional formulation and mixing techniques. Before combining with the other ingredients in the shampoo chassis, the silicone is emulsified to form a silicone emulsion.
It will be appreciated that other modifications of the present invention within the skill of those in the shampoo formulation art can be undertaken without departing from the spirit and scope of this invention. All parts, percentages, and ratios herein are by weight unless otherwise specified. Some components may come from suppliers as dilute solutions. The amount stated reflects the weight percent of the active material, unless otherwise specified.
The following are non-limiting examples of the shampoo composition described herein.
Silicone a and b, used in the micoremulsions in the examples in the Tables, below, have the specific silicone structure in the examples corresponds to (Ia) below:
M-Y—[-(N+R2-T-N+R2)—Y—]m-M (Ia)
with the following values:
m is about 2,
M represents a terminal group, comprising terminal ester groups selected from
—OC(O)—Z
wherein Z is a monovalent organic residues having about 11 carbon atoms (lauric ester).
Y is a combination of groups of the formula:
—K—S—K— and -A-E-A′- or -A′-E-A-,
with S=
wherein R1=methyl;
for Silicone a n=140 to 150 for an average chain length of 145;
for Silicone b n=105 to 115 for an average chain length of 110;
K is a bivalent straight chain, substituted with —OH,
A and A′ each are acetic ester groups —OC(O)—CH2— or —CH2—C(O)O—
E is a polyethylene oxide group of the general formula:
—[CH2CH2O]q—[CH2CH(CH3)O]r—[CH2CH(C2H5)O]s—
wherein q=2, r=−0, and s=0
T is a divalent organic group having about 6 carbon atoms.
The molar ratio of silicone to alkylene oxide block for Silicone a and b is 9:1. The viscosity of Silicone a is 10,100 cP and the viscosity of Silicone b is 15,400 cP (Brookfield Sp. 4, 12RPM, 22° C.). The nitrogen content for Silicone a is 0.19 mmol N/g polymer and the nitrogen content for Silicone B is 0.24 mmol N/g polymer.
Table 2 includes silicone emulsions that were used in the shampoo compositions in Table 3, Table 8, and Table 13.
1Silicone a = Experimental silicone polymer, according to the structure described herein, containing polyorganosiloxane compounds where the silicone blocks contain an average of 145 repeating siloxane units.
To make a clear shampoo composition, the silicone emulsion can be clear, and the silicone emulsion can maintain its clarity after being incorporated into a shampoo composition. The more hydrophobic silicones, such as terminal amino silicones (TAS) and Silicone Quaternium-26 (PQAS, available from Momentive™) are too hydrophobic to make clear nanoemulsions. Some of the existing clear nanoemulsions in the market such as Silsoft™ Q (Aqua (and) Silicone Quaternium-18 (and) Trideceth-6 (and) Trideceth-12, available from Momentive™) are very hydrophilic and may not capable of providing enough conditioning benefit to the hair.
The HLB (hydrophilic-lipophilic balance) of a surfactant, for instance an emulsifier, is a measure of the degree to which it is hydrophilic or lipophilic. This value indicates the hydrophylic-lipophylic balance of a molecule and is calculated theoretically:
The HLB for the emulsifiers can be from about 10 to about 11.5, alternatively from about 10.3 to about 11.
In Table 1, clarity was determined by visual inspection (i.e. if a label could be read through the emulsion then it was visually clear). It was found that the ratio of emulsifier to silicone was important to the clarity of the silicone emulsion. Emulsions 3, 4, and 6 were clear after being stored for three months in a closed 100 g polyethylene terephthalate (PET) container at approximately ambient conditions (20-25° C. at 60% relative humidity). However, Emulsion 5 was transparent after being stored for three months at the same conditions. Since Emulsion 5 is transparent after 3 months, it may not be used in clear shampoo formulations. Emulsion 5 had a lower ratio of emulsifier to silicone (0.3), as compared to Emulsions 3, 4, and 6 (with ratios of 0.5, 0.4, and 0.5 respectively).
Silicone emulsions used in clear shampoo formulations can have an emulsifier to silicone ratio greater than or equal to 0.3, alternatively greater than or equal to 0.35, alternatively greater than or equal to 0.4. Silicone emulsions used in clear shampoo formulations can have an emulsifier to silicone ratio from about 0.32 to about 1, alternatively from about 0.35 to about 0.8, alternatively from about 0.37 to about 0.7, alternatively from about 0.38 to about 0.65, and alternatively from about 0.4 to about 0.6.
Table 3 has opaque shampoos with different silicone emulsions. Examples A-1, A-2, A-4, and A-6 have 1% silicone. Examples A-1 and A-2 use silicone emulsions that are in current clear products and Examples A-4 and A-6 use emulsions with experimental silicones.
1Sodium Laureth 1 Sulfate, 26% active, supplied by Procter & Gamble MFG Co., Kansas City, USA
2Cocamidopropyl Betaine High pH at 30% active, from BASF ®
3N-Hance ™ 3196, MW of 1.7 million, from Ashland ™
4Polyquaternium 6, PolyDADMAC, MW of 150,000, CD of 6.2, trade name. Mirapol ® 100 s, 31.5% active, from Solvay
5DC 1872 silicone emulsion (dimethiconol) with an average particle size of 30 nm, from Dow Corning ®
6Belsil DM5500 polysiloxane emulsion, with an average particle size from about 100-150 nm, from Wacker ®
Examples A-1, A-2, A-4, and A-6 were evaluated for wet conditioning, dry conditioning, and silicone deposition on general population hair. Wet conditioning is evaluated by determining the wet feel (final rinse friction) and wet combing (Instrom Triple Comb (ITC)) and the dry conditioning is evaluated by determining the dry feel (Inter Fiber Friction (IFF)). Each test was repeated four times and the mean was calculated. The results of these tests are in Table 4 to Table 7, below, and
Table 4 and
Table 5 and
Table 6 and
Table 7 and
Ex. A-1 and A-2 have silicone emulsions that are used in current shampoo formulations and have wet fee and dry feel that is consumer acceptable. As shown in Table 4, Table 5, and Table 6 and
Ex. A-6 may also be acceptable to consumers. The dry feel is parity to the dry feel of Ex. A-1 and A-2 and it has very low silicone deposition in this chassis, which consumers may prefer if they do not like the coated feel or buildup of silicone.
Table 8 has opaque shampoos with different silicone emulsions. Examples B to F have 1% silicone. Example B uses a silicone emulsion that is in current clear shampoo compositions and Example G was made without silicone.
1Sodium Laureth 1 Sulfate, 26% active, supplied by Procter & Gamble MFG Co., Kansas City, USA
2Cocamidopropyl Betaine High pH at 30% active, from BASF ®
3Jaguar ® Excel, with an average molecule weight of 1.2 million, available from Solvay
4UCare ™ Polymer LR-30M, MW 1.8 million, available from Dow ® Chemical Company
5DC 1872 silicone emulsion (dimethiconol) with an average particle size of 30 nm, from Dow Corning ®
Examples B to G were evaluated for wet conditioning and dry conditioning on general population hair. Each test was repeated four times and the mean was calculated. The results of these tests are in Table 9 to Table 11, below, and
Table 9 and
Table 10 and
Table 11 and
Ex. C to F contain an experimental silicone (silicone a) and have wet conditioning and dry conditioning that is either better or as good as Ex. B, which contains DC 1872 silicone emulsion, an emulsion that is used in current products. Ex. C to F provide a significant improvement on dry feel that was not achievable with Ex. B. Therefore, Ex. C to F may be consumer preferred.
1Sodium Laureth 1 Sulfate, 26% active, supplied by Procter & Gamble MFG Co., Kansas City, USA
2Cocamidopropyl Betaine High pH at 30% active, from BASF ®
3Cocamide MEA flakes, 85% active, BASF ®
Next, a shampoo composition with 1% Silicone a (Ex. I) was compared to a shampoo composition with 1% silicone containing the DC 1872 silicone emulsion (Ex. J) to see if there was a consumer noticeable performance difference in later, wet feel, dry feel, and end look. Examples I and J are in Table 13.
1Sodium Laureth 1 Sulfate, 26% active, supplied by Procter & Gamble MFG Co., Kansas City, USA
2Cocamidopropyl Betaine High pH at 30% active, from BASF ®
3N-Hance ™ 3196, MW of 1.7 million, supplier: Ashland ™
4Polyquaternium 6, PolyDADMAC, MW of 150,000, CD of 6.2, trade name. Mirapol ® 100 s, 31.5% active, from Solvay
5DC 1872 silicone emulsion (dimethiconol) with an average particle size of 30 nm, from Dow Corning ®
Table 14, below, provides a summary of the panelists and their hair type in this study.
The study was conducted at Procter & Gamble, Sharon Woods Innovation Center Salon (Sharonville, Ohio, USA) by a P&G employed stylist. The salon includes sinks that are standardized at 100° F. (37.8° C.) and 1.5 Gallon Per Minute (GPM) (5.7 liters per minute) water pressure.
Overall, Ex. I, which contains Silicone a, was preferred by the panelists 5-1 over Ex. J, which contains the DC 1872 emulsion that is currently used. Overall, the panelists thought that Ex. I had a quicker and cleaner rinse profile without a stripping feel, which can be consumer preferred. The panelists also commented that the post-rinse profile for Ex. I tended to be cleaner than Ex. J. The differences at dry end feel were most noticeable and this ultimately led 5 of the panelists to prefer Ex. I because they found the end look to feel fuller, cleaner, softer, more aligned and less static.
In some examples, it can be desirable to use the silicone described herein in a low viscosity, compact shampoo composition. The composition can be phase stable, color stable, and can also provide good conditioning during use. The shampoo composition can be clear, transparent, or opaque. An opaque composition can have a % transmittance of 30% or less, as determined by the % Transmittance Test Method, described herein.
In other examples, the shampoo can be dispensed from an aerosol or pump foam dispenser as a foam. The foam can form a stable foam. A foam is stable when it substantially sustains its volume from the time of dispensing to its application on hair. The foam can have a density of from about 0.025 g/cm3 to about 0.15 g/cm3 when dispensed from the aerosol dispenser.
For the Examples in Table 21, the microemulsion of Silicone can be formed by mixing 2 g of Silicone a and 1 g of Tergitol™ 15-S-5 (available from Dow®). Mixing can be continued while 6.93 g of water is added dropwise. Then, 0.07 g lactic acid is added and a transparent to slightly turbid microemulsion is obtained.
Example 1 and 2, which contain Silicone a and b, respectively, may be consumer preferred because they provide better post rinse combing than Comparative Examples 1-4. The post rinse combing is determined by ten expert panelists who comb a hair switch and rate give it a rating from 1-10, with 10 being the easiest to comb.
Table 22 includes shampoo compositions that can be dispensed as a foam.
1 Sodium Laureth (1 molar ethylene oxide) sulfate at 70% active, supplier: Stepan Co.
2Sodium Xylene Sulfonate from Stepan Company
3 Jaguar ® C500, MW of 500,000, CD of 0.8, from Solvay
4Experimental silicone polymer, according to the structure described herein, containing polyorganosiloxane compounds where the silicone blocks contain an average of 145 repeating siloxane units.
5Experimental silicone polymer, according to the structure described herein, containing polyorganosiloxane compounds where the silicone blocks contain an average of 110 repeating siloxane units.
9Foaming Agent A46 (a mixture of 84.85% by weight of isobutane and 15.15% by weight of propane) Diversified Cpc International (Channahon US)
10Blowing Agent HF0 (Trans 1,3,3,3 Tetrafluroprop-1-ene) from Honeywell
11Sodium Undeceth Sulfate (C11E1S, Isachem 123S, 1 mole of Ethoxylation) at 70% active, supplier: Procter & Gamble ®
12LAPB (Mackam DAB), at 35% active level, supplier: Rhodia
Cone/Plate Viscosity Measurement
The viscosities of the examples are measured by a Cone/Plate Controlled Stress Brookfield Rheometer R/S Plus, by Brookfield Engineering Laboratories, Stoughton, Mass. The cone used (Spindle C-75-1) has a diameter of 75 mm and 1° angle. The viscosity is determined using a steady state flow experiment at constant shear rate of 2 s−1 and at temperature of 26.5° C. The sample size is 2.5 ml and the total measurement reading time is 3 minutes.
Foam Density & Foam Volume
Foam density is measured by placing a 100 ml beaker onto a mass balance, tarring the mass of the beaker and then dispensing product from the aerosol container into the 100 ml beaker until the volume of the foam is above the rim of the vessel. The foam is made level with the top of the beaker by scraping a spatula across it within 10 seconds of dispensing the foam above the rim of the vessel. The resulting mass of the 100 ml of foam is then divided by the volume (100) to determine the foam density in units of g/ml.
Foam volume is measured by placing a weigh boat onto a mass balance, tarring the mass of the weigh boat and then dispensing the desired amount of product from the aerosol container. The grams of foam dispensed is determined and then divided by the density of foam as determined from the Foam Density methodology to reach a volume of foam in ml or cm3.
Foam Rheology Method (Yield Point)
Foam shampoo is applied to the AR1000 rheometer for foam oscillation stress sweep. 60 mm smooth acrylic plate is utilized for shear stress measurement. Measurement is made at 25 C. The plate head is lowered to 1200 microns and excess foam is removed with a spatula so that drag does not occur during measurement. The measurement gap height is then lowered 1000 microns. Sweep occurs from 0.1 to 400 Pa. Data is analyzed via TA Rheology Advantage Data Analysis software. Yield point is determined at the point at which the oscillatory shear stress begins to deviate from its tangent. The yield point measurements are reported in Pa units.
Kruss Lather Analyzer (Bubble Size)
The commercially available Kruss lather analyzer DFA100, supplied from Kruss, is used to analyze the foam shampoo for the initial Sauter mean radius R32 (bubble size). Shampoo foam is dispensed into the CY4571 column containing a prism. An internal stopper is placed into the column approximately 100 ml from the top of the chamber. The camera height is set to 244 mm and camera position is placed in the 3 slot. Structure foaming is captured at 2 frames per second for 120 seconds. Data analysis is performed on the Kruss Advance 1.5.1.0 software application version.
Silicone Deposition (ppm) Test Method:
Hair samples treated with different products are submitted as balls of hair with an average sample size of 0.1 g. These hair samples are then digested using a single reaction chamber microwave digestion system (Milestone Inc., Shelton, Conn.) using a 6:1 HNO3:H2O2 mixture and an aliquot of methyl isobutyl ketone (MIBK) in Teflon digestion vessels. A gentle digestion program with a ramp to 95° C. and a manual vent after cooling below 30° C. is used to facilitate retention of silicon. After dilution to volume, the samples are run against an inorganic silicon calibration curve produced on an Optima 8300 ICP-OES system (Perkin Elmer, Waltham, Mass.) run in the axial mode. The silicon values determined are converted to a concentration of silicone polymer-equivalents deposited on the hair sample using the theoretical silicon concentration of the polymer provided by the manufacturer. An untreated hair sample is analyzed to determine the background concentration of silicon to allow correction if needed. Another untreated hair sample is spiked with a known amount of polymer and analyzed to ensure recovery of the polymer and verify the analysis.
Dry Feel (Inter Fiber Friction, IFF)
The inter-fiber friction method emulates the motion of rubbing hair between the thumb and index finger in an up and down direction. The method evaluates the hair to hair interaction of dried hair switches, determining the hair static friction, which is a key component of hair volume. The hair switches that weigh 4 g and. have a length of 8 inches with a configuration of round pony tail.
The switches are treated with shampoo. For shampoos in liquid form, 0.2 ml of a liquid shampoo is applied on the hair switch in a zigzag pattern uniformly to cover the entire hair length, using a syringe. For shampoo in aerosol foam form, foam shampoo is dispensed to a weighing pan on a balance and 0.2 grams of foam shampoo is taken out from weighing pan and applied on the hair switch uniformly to cover the entire hair length via a spatula. The hair switch is then lathered for 30 seconds, rinsed with water for 30 seconds, and dried overnight in a controlled temperature and humidity room (22° C./50 RH).
A TA-XT plus Texture Analyzer (by Stable Micro Systems) or equivalent piece of equipment is used for the evaluation. The switch, after combing 5 times to remove tangles, is sandwiched between two plates with polyurethane skin surrogate substrate surfaces (skin flex paint, supplied by Burman Industries) under pressure of 40 psi (275.8 kPa), at 10 mm/sec. The plates can move up and down with a speed of 10 mms and a distance of each cycle of 200 mm for 5 cycles. Each of the peak forces for the 5 cycles are added to calculate Peak Sum which represents the static friction of hair. The static force correlates with consumer's hair smooth feel. Therefore, the higher the static force the larger the value the coarser the hair. The measurement is repeated for each hair switch.
Hair Wet Feel Friction Measurement (Final Rinse Friction and Initial Rinse Friction):
A switch of 4 grams general population hair at 8 inches length is used for the measurement. Water temperature is set at 100° F., hardness is 7 grain per gallon, and flow rate is 1.6 liter per minute. For shampoos in liquid form, 0.2 ml of a liquid shampoo is applied on the hair switch in a zigzag pattern uniformly to cover the entire hair length, using a syringe. For shampoo in aerosol foam form, foam shampoo is dispensed to a weighing pan on a balance. 0.2 grams of foam shampoo is taken out from weighing pan and applied on the hair switch uniformly to cover the entire hair length via a spatula. The hair switch is then lathered for 30 seconds, rinse with water for 30 seconds, and 2nd lathered for 30 seconds. Water flow rate is then reduced to 0.2 liter per minute. The hair switch is sandwiched with a clamp under 1800 gram of force and pulled through the entire length while the water is running at the low flow rate. The pull time is 30 second. Friction is measured with a friction analyzer with a load cell of 5 kg. Repeat the pull under rinse for total of 21 times. Total 21 friction values are collected. The final rinse friction is the average friction of the last 7 points and initial rinse friction is the average of the initial 7 points.
% Transmittance
The percent transmittance (% T) can be measured using Ultra-Violet/Visible (UV/VI) spectrophotometry which determines the transmission of UV/VIS light through a sample. A light wavelength of 600 nm has been shown to be adequate for characterizing the degree of light transmittance through a sample. Typically, it is best to follow the specific instructions relating to the specific spectrophotometer being used. In general, the procedure for measuring percent transmittance starts by setting the spectrophotometer to 600 nm. Then a calibration “blank” is run to calibrate the readout to 100 percent transmittance. A single test sample is then placed in a cuvette designed to fit the specific spectrophotometer and care is taken to insure no air bubbles are within the sample before the % T is measured by the spectrophotometer at 600 nm. Alternatively, multiple samples can be measured simultaneously by using a spectrophotometer such as the SpectraMax M-5 available from Molecular Devices. Multiple samples can be prepared within a 96 well plate (VWR catalog #82006-448) and then transferred to a 96 well visible flat bottom plate (Greiner part #655-001), ensuring that no air bubbles are within the sample. The flat bottom plate is placed within the SpectraMax M-5 and % T measured using the Software Pro v.5™ software available from Molecular Devices.
Wet Combing Test (Instron Triple Comb, ITC)
This wet friction test determines the amount of conditioning provided by shampoo products as measured by the force required to pull hair through an Instron® equipped with three combs while wet. An Instron® 5542 or 5543 Tensile Tester with an attachment for combing hair switches and an Instron® 2530-437 50N tension/compression load cell is used. The operator ranks and balances the 4 g, 8 in. general population hair switches for base line condition by using the Instron® machine to determine a baseline force. The operator then applies 0.1 g of shampoo per gram of hair to a hair switch, distributing the product evenly through the switch. The wet forces are then measured after the product is rinsed using the Instron® machine equipped with three aligned combs simultaneously (the combs are arranged as follows: Cleopatra™ fine tooth, a second Cleopatra™ fine tooth, and a Cleopatra™ wide tooth comb) pulling at a rate of 17 mm/sec reading data every 0.5 sec. Each test product is applied to a total of 4 switches. The switches are mounted on the instrument and the force required to comb the switches measured. In all experiments at least 5 readings are performed on each switch and at least 3 switches are used for each treatment. The data is then analyzed using standard statistical methods. Coarse Stroke 1 is the data point on the wide tooth comb at the first comb point.
The dimensions and values disclosed herein are not to be understood as being strictly limited to the exact numerical values recited. Instead, unless otherwise specified, each such dimension is intended to mean both the recited value and a functionally equivalent range surrounding that value. For example, a dimension disclosed as “40 mm” is intended to mean “about 40 mm.”
Every document cited herein, including any cross referenced or related patent or application and any patent application or patent to which this application claims priority or benefit thereof, is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety unless expressly excluded or otherwise limited. The citation of any document is not an admission that it is prior art with respect to any invention disclosed or claimed herein or that it alone, or in any combination with any other reference or references, teaches, suggests or discloses any such invention. Further, to the extent that any meaning or definition of a term in this document conflicts with any meaning or definition of the same term in a document incorporated by reference, the meaning or definition assigned to that term in this document shall govern.
While particular embodiments of the present invention have been illustrated and described, it would be obvious to those skilled in the art that various other changes and modifications can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. It is therefore intended to cover in the appended claims all such changes and modifications that are within the scope of this invention.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2879231 | Marshall | Mar 1959 | A |
| 3709437 | Wright | Jan 1973 | A |
| 3950532 | Bouillon et al. | Apr 1976 | A |
| 3959160 | Horsler et al. | May 1976 | A |
| 4309119 | Wittersheim | Jan 1982 | A |
| 4329334 | Su et al. | May 1982 | A |
| 4726945 | Patel | Feb 1988 | A |
| 4839166 | Grollier et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
| 4867971 | Ryan et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
| 4997641 | Hartnett | Mar 1991 | A |
| 5294644 | Login et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
| 5332569 | Wood et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
| 5364031 | Taniguchi et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5374421 | Tashiro | Dec 1994 | A |
| 5417965 | Janchitraponvej et al. | May 1995 | A |
| 5439682 | Wivell | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5441659 | Minor | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5560918 | Wivell | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5578298 | Berthiaume | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5599549 | Wivell | Feb 1997 | A |
| 5635469 | Fowler et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
| 5747436 | Patel et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5776444 | Birtwistle et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5816446 | Steindorf et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5830440 | Sturla et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5853618 | Barker | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5902225 | Monson | May 1999 | A |
| 5980877 | Baravetto | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5985939 | Minor | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6015780 | Llosas Bigorra et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6020303 | Cripe et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6039933 | Samain et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6046152 | Vinson et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6060443 | Cripe et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6087309 | Vinson et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6110451 | Matz et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6133222 | Vinson et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6153569 | Halloran | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6162834 | Sebillotte-Arnaud et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6231844 | Nambu | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6268431 | Snyder et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6284225 | Bhatt | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6329331 | Aronson et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6335312 | Coffindaffer et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
| 6423305 | Cauwet-Martin et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6451300 | Dunlop et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6511669 | Garnier et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
| 6579907 | Sebillotte-Arnaud et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
| 6627585 | Steer | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6642194 | Harrison | Nov 2003 | B2 |
| 6649155 | Dunlop et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
| 6716455 | Birkel | Apr 2004 | B2 |
| 6743760 | Hardy et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
| 6827795 | Scheper et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
| 6897253 | Schmucker-Castner | May 2005 | B2 |
| 6930078 | Wells | Aug 2005 | B2 |
| 6992054 | Lee et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
| 7217752 | Schmucker-Castner et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
| 7220408 | Decoster et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
| 7223385 | Gawtrey et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
| 7485289 | Gawtrey et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
| 7504094 | Decoster et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
| 7531497 | Midha et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
| 7541320 | Dabkowski et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
| 7659233 | Hurley et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
| 7666825 | Wagner et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
| 7820609 | Soffin et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
| 7829514 | Paul et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| 7928053 | Hecht et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
| 7977288 | SenGupta | Jul 2011 | B2 |
| 8084407 | Soffin et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
| 8088721 | Soffin et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
| 8119168 | Johnson | Feb 2012 | B2 |
| 8124063 | Harichian et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
| 8300949 | Xu | Oct 2012 | B2 |
| 8388699 | Wood | Mar 2013 | B2 |
| 8401304 | Cavallaro et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
| 8435501 | Peffly et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
| 8437556 | Saisan | May 2013 | B1 |
| 8580725 | Kuhlman et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
| 8609600 | Warr et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
| 8628760 | Carter et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
| 8653014 | Hilvert | Feb 2014 | B2 |
| 8675919 | Maladen | Mar 2014 | B2 |
| 8680035 | Kuhlman et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
| 8699751 | Maladen | Apr 2014 | B2 |
| 8709385 | Tamarkin | Apr 2014 | B2 |
| 8741363 | Albrecht et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
| 8771765 | Fernandez | Jul 2014 | B1 |
| 8795635 | Tamarkin et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
| 8883698 | Scheibel et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
| 9006162 | Rizk | Apr 2015 | B1 |
| 9186642 | Dihora et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
| 9265727 | Lowenborg | Feb 2016 | B1 |
| 9296550 | Smith | Mar 2016 | B2 |
| 9308398 | Hutton et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
| 9428616 | Wagner | Aug 2016 | B2 |
| 9512275 | Wagner | Dec 2016 | B2 |
| 9610239 | Feng | Apr 2017 | B2 |
| 9682021 | Tamarkin et al. | Jun 2017 | B2 |
| 9776787 | Nakajima | Oct 2017 | B2 |
| 9949901 | Zhao | Apr 2018 | B2 |
| 9968535 | Kitko | May 2018 | B2 |
| 9968537 | Sharma | May 2018 | B2 |
| 9993419 | Glenn, Jr. | Jun 2018 | B2 |
| 9993420 | Glenn, Jr. et al. | Jun 2018 | B2 |
| 10311575 | Stofel | Jun 2019 | B2 |
| 10426713 | Song | Oct 2019 | B2 |
| 10441519 | Zhao | Oct 2019 | B2 |
| 10653590 | Torres Rivera | May 2020 | B2 |
| 10799434 | Torres Rivera | Oct 2020 | B2 |
| 10842720 | Thompson | Nov 2020 | B2 |
| 20010000467 | Murray | Apr 2001 | A1 |
| 20010006088 | Lyle | Jul 2001 | A1 |
| 20010006621 | Coupe et al. | Jul 2001 | A1 |
| 20010016565 | Bodet et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
| 20020028182 | Dawson | Mar 2002 | A1 |
| 20020037299 | Turowski-Wanke et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
| 20020172648 | Hehner et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20020193265 | Perron et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20020197213 | Schmenger et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20030022799 | Alvarado et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030049292 | Turowski-Wanke et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030050150 | Tanaka | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030059377 | Riley | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030083210 | Goldberg | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030108501 | Hofrichter | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030147842 | Restle et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030154561 | Patel | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030161802 | Flammer | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030180246 | Frantz et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030185867 | Kerschner et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030223951 | Geary et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20030228272 | Amjad et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20040014879 | Denzer et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040144863 | Kendrick | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040229963 | Stephane | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040235689 | Sakai et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20050020468 | Frantz et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050136011 | Nekludoff | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050152863 | Brautigam | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050233929 | Queen | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20060002880 | Peffly | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060030509 | Modi | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060057075 | Arkin et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060057097 | Derici | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060079417 | Wagner | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060079418 | Wagner et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060079419 | Wagner et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060079420 | Wagner et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060079421 | Wagner et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060090777 | Hecht et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060120982 | Derici et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060120988 | Bailey et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060135397 | Bissey-Beugras | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060183662 | Crotty et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060210139 | Carroll | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060229227 | Goldman | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060252662 | Soffin | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060276357 | Smith, III et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20060292104 | Guskey | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20070072781 | Soffin et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070110700 | Wells | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070154402 | Trumbore et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070155637 | Smith, III et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070160555 | Staudigel | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070179207 | Fernandez de Castro et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070269397 | Terada | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070292380 | Staudigel | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20080008668 | Harichian et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080019928 | Franzke | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080063618 | Johnson | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080138442 | Johnson | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080152610 | Cajan | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080206179 | Peffly et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080260655 | Tamarkin et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080261844 | Ruppert et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080317698 | Wells et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20090029900 | Cetti et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090041702 | Molenda | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090062406 | Loeffler | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090155383 | Kitko et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090178210 | Bistram | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090197784 | Ainger | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090221463 | Kitko et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090246236 | Kitko | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090312224 | Yang et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20090324505 | Seidling | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20100183539 | Bernhardt | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100310644 | Liebmann | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20110008267 | Arkin et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
| 20110165107 | Derks et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110171155 | Federle | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110232668 | Hoffmann et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110268778 | Dihora | Nov 2011 | A1 |
| 20110269657 | Dihora et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
| 20110305739 | Royce | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20110319790 | Kost et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20120014901 | Sunkel et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
| 20120031419 | Batt | Feb 2012 | A1 |
| 20120034173 | Batt | Feb 2012 | A1 |
| 20120100091 | Hata et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
| 20120100092 | Murray | Apr 2012 | A1 |
| 20120291911 | Smith | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120309660 | Kawasoe | Dec 2012 | A1 |
| 20120316095 | Wei et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
| 20130053295 | Kinoshita et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
| 20130053300 | Scheibel et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
| 20130089587 | Staudigel | Apr 2013 | A1 |
| 20130115173 | Trumbore et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130143784 | Rizk | Jun 2013 | A1 |
| 20130150338 | Ananthapadmanabhan | Jun 2013 | A1 |
| 20130156712 | Frantz | Jun 2013 | A1 |
| 20130189212 | Jawale et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
| 20130243718 | Pasquet | Sep 2013 | A1 |
| 20130244922 | Bartelt | Sep 2013 | A1 |
| 20130280192 | Carter et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130280202 | Stella et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130284195 | Murdock | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130296289 | Hall et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
| 20140037703 | Dihora et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
| 20140039066 | Grimadell et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
| 20140127149 | Lepilleur | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140131395 | Chang | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140134125 | Dahl | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140162979 | Palla-Venkata | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20140171471 | Krueger | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20140216495 | Bureiko | Aug 2014 | A1 |
| 20140228268 | Fahl et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
| 20140237732 | Zuedel Fernandes et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
| 20140308227 | Mabille | Oct 2014 | A1 |
| 20140309154 | Carter et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
| 20140335041 | Peffly et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
| 20140348884 | Hilvert et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
| 20140348886 | Johnson et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
| 20150021496 | Shabbir | Jan 2015 | A1 |
| 20150037273 | Wagner | Feb 2015 | A1 |
| 20150050231 | Murase | Feb 2015 | A1 |
| 20150093420 | Snyder | Apr 2015 | A1 |
| 20150098921 | Franzke et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
| 20150099684 | Boutique | Apr 2015 | A1 |
| 20150110728 | Jayaswal | Apr 2015 | A1 |
| 20150147286 | Barrera | May 2015 | A1 |
| 20150218496 | Schmiedel et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
| 20150297489 | Kleinen | Oct 2015 | A1 |
| 20150313818 | Stagg | Nov 2015 | A1 |
| 20150359725 | Glenn, Jr. et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
| 20160008257 | Zhou et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
| 20160022566 | Figura | Jan 2016 | A1 |
| 20160113849 | Grimadell et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
| 20160128944 | Chawrai | May 2016 | A1 |
| 20160193125 | Jones et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
| 20160279048 | Jayaswal et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
| 20160287503 | Schroeder | Oct 2016 | A1 |
| 20160287509 | Peffly | Oct 2016 | A1 |
| 20160303043 | Khoury | Oct 2016 | A1 |
| 20160309871 | Torres Rivera et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
| 20160310369 | Thompson et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
| 20160310370 | Zhao et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
| 20160310371 | Zhao | Oct 2016 | A1 |
| 20160310375 | Torres Rivera | Oct 2016 | A1 |
| 20160310386 | Smith, III et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
| 20160310388 | Smith, III et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
| 20160310389 | Thompson et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
| 20160310390 | Smith, III et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
| 20160310391 | Smith, III et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
| 20160310393 | Chang et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
| 20160310402 | Zhao et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
| 20160317424 | Kadir | Nov 2016 | A1 |
| 20160354300 | Thompson et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
| 20170071837 | Schelges et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
| 20170101609 | Vargas | Apr 2017 | A1 |
| 20170165164 | Zhao et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
| 20170165165 | Zhao et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
| 20170209359 | Zhao et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
| 20170252273 | Renock et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
| 20170278249 | Stofel et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
| 20170283959 | Shellef | Oct 2017 | A1 |
| 20170304172 | Chang et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
| 20170304184 | Glenn, Jr. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
| 20170304185 | Glenn, Jr. et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
| 20170304186 | Glenn, Jr. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
| 20170333321 | Carnali | Nov 2017 | A1 |
| 20180044097 | Zeik | Feb 2018 | A1 |
| 20180057451 | Owens et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
| 20180110688 | Torres Rivera et al. | Apr 2018 | A1 |
| 20180110689 | Torres Rivera et al. | Apr 2018 | A1 |
| 20180110690 | Torres Rivera et al. | Apr 2018 | A1 |
| 20180110691 | Torres Rivera et al. | Apr 2018 | A1 |
| 20180110692 | Torres Rivera et al. | Apr 2018 | A1 |
| 20180110693 | Renock et al. | Apr 2018 | A1 |
| 20180110694 | Renock et al. | Apr 2018 | A1 |
| 20180110695 | Thompson et al. | Apr 2018 | A1 |
| 20180110704 | Zhao et al. | Apr 2018 | A1 |
| 20180110707 | Zhao et al. | Apr 2018 | A1 |
| 20180110710 | Zhao et al. | Apr 2018 | A1 |
| 20180110714 | Glenn, Jr. et al. | Apr 2018 | A1 |
| 20180116937 | Park et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
| 20180116941 | Wang | May 2018 | A1 |
| 20180221266 | Zhao et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
| 20180256481 | Glenn, Jr. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
| 20180311135 | Chang | Nov 2018 | A1 |
| 20180311136 | Chang | Nov 2018 | A1 |
| 20180318194 | Hoffmann et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
| 20180344611 | Zhao et al. | Dec 2018 | A1 |
| 20180344612 | Zhao et al. | Dec 2018 | A1 |
| 20180344613 | Zhao et al. | Dec 2018 | A1 |
| 20180344614 | Zhao et al. | Dec 2018 | A1 |
| 20190105242 | Song | Apr 2019 | A1 |
| 20190105243 | Song | Apr 2019 | A1 |
| 20190105244 | Song | Apr 2019 | A1 |
| 20190105245 | Song | Apr 2019 | A1 |
| 20190105246 | Cochran | Apr 2019 | A1 |
| 20190105247 | Song | Apr 2019 | A1 |
| 20190117543 | Zhao | Apr 2019 | A1 |
| 20190117544 | Zhao | Apr 2019 | A1 |
| 20190117545 | Zhao | Apr 2019 | A1 |
| 20190142711 | Torres Rivera | May 2019 | A1 |
| 20190183778 | Glenn, Jr. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
| 20190192405 | Zhao | Jun 2019 | A1 |
| 20190240121 | Torres Rivera | Aug 2019 | A1 |
| 20190307298 | Zhao | Oct 2019 | A1 |
| 20190365633 | Glenn, Jr. | Dec 2019 | A1 |
| 20200000690 | Renock | Jan 2020 | A1 |
| 20200129402 | Jamadagni | Apr 2020 | A1 |
| 20200163846 | Song | May 2020 | A1 |
| 20200237628 | Torres Rivera | Jul 2020 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 2078375 | Mar 1994 | CA |
| 102697668 | Aug 2013 | CN |
| 102697670 | Jul 2014 | CN |
| 102851015 | Dec 2014 | CN |
| 105769617 | Jul 2016 | CN |
| 4315396 | Nov 1994 | DE |
| 202005009618 | Sep 2005 | DE |
| 0574086 | Dec 1993 | EP |
| 1340485 | Feb 2003 | EP |
| 1346720 | Sep 2003 | EP |
| 1714678 | Oct 2006 | EP |
| 2042216 | Sep 2015 | EP |
| 356011009 | Dec 1981 | JP |
| 358113300 | Jul 1983 | JP |
| H08310924 | Nov 1996 | JP |
| 2964226 | Oct 1999 | JP |
| 3069802 | Jul 2000 | JP |
| 2003201217 | Dec 2001 | JP |
| 2002226889 | Aug 2002 | JP |
| 3480165 | Dec 2003 | JP |
| 3634988 | Mar 2005 | JP |
| 3634991 | Mar 2005 | JP |
| 3634996 | Mar 2005 | JP |
| 2005187359 | Jul 2005 | JP |
| 2008214292 | Sep 2008 | JP |
| 5041113 | Jul 2012 | JP |
| 5046394 | Jan 2014 | JP |
| 5667790 | Feb 2015 | JP |
| 1020080111280 | Dec 2008 | KR |
| 20140060882 | May 2014 | KR |
| WO199325650 | Dec 1993 | WO |
| WO9502389 | Jan 1995 | WO |
| WO9726854 | Jul 1997 | WO |
| WO9823258 | Jun 1998 | WO |
| WO9918928 | Apr 1999 | WO |
| WO9924004 | May 1999 | WO |
| D012553 | Mar 2000 | WO |
| WO0142409 | Jun 2001 | WO |
| WO0148021 | Jul 2001 | WO |
| WO2005023975 | Mar 2005 | WO |
| WO2009016555 | Feb 2009 | WO |
| 2009053931 | Apr 2009 | WO |
| WO2010052147 | May 2010 | WO |
| WO2012055587 | May 2012 | WO |
| WO2012084970 | Jun 2012 | WO |
| WO2013010706 | Jan 2013 | WO |
| WO2014148245 | Sep 2014 | WO |
| WO2016147196 | Sep 2016 | WO |
| 2017052161 | Mar 2017 | WO |
| 2017140798 | Aug 2017 | WO |
| WO2017207685 | Dec 2017 | WO |
| WO2018023180 | Feb 2018 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| U.S. Appl. No. 16/170,516, filed Oct. 25, 2018, Chang et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 16/170,711, filed Oct. 25, 2018, Jamadagni et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 16/248,900, filed Jan. 16, 2019, Torres Rivera et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 16/285,535, filed Feb. 26, 2019, Zhao et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 16/226,927, filed Dec. 20, 2018, Glenn, Jr. et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 16/376,033, filed Apr. 5, 2019, Zhao et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 16/390,270, filed Apr. 22, 2019, Torres Rivera et al. |
| “Natural Detangling Shampoo”, Mintel Database, Sep. 13, 2017. |
| “Soda Shampoo”, Mintel Database, Apr. 2015. |
| “Treatment Foam for Recurrent Scaling Conditions”, Mintel Database, Aug. 2007. |
| All Final and Non-Final Office Actions for U.S. Appl. No. 16/156,045. |
| All Final and Non-Final Office Actions for U.S. Appl. No. 15/135,657. |
| All Final and Non-Final Office Actions for U.S. Appl. No. 15/135,663. |
| All Final and Non-Final Office Actions for U.S. Appl. No. 15/135,677. |
| All Final and Non-Final Office Actions for U.S. Appl. No. 15/135,701. |
| All Final and Non-Final Office Actions for U.S. Appl. No. 15/135,998. |
| All Final and Non-Final Office Actions for U.S. Appl. No. 15/145,696. |
| All Final and Non-Final Office Actions for U.S. Appl. No. 15/2788,938. |
| All Final and Non-Final Office Actions for U.S. Appl. No. 15/299,860. |
| All final and non-final office actions for U.S. Appl. No. 15/379,660. |
| All final and non-final office actions for U.S. Appl. No. 15/379,674. |
| All final and non-final office actions for U.S. Appl. No. 15/448,911. |
| All final and non-final office actions for U.S. Appl. No. 15/467,317. |
| All Final and Non-Final Office Actions for U.S. Appl. No. 15/481,777. |
| All Final and Non-Final Office Actions for U.S. Appl. No. 15/788,895. |
| All Final and Non-Final Office Actions for U.S. Appl. No. 15/788,949. |
| All Final and Non-Final Office Actions for U.S. Appl. No. 15/788,998. |
| All Final and Non-Final Office Actions for U.S. Appl. No. 15/789,010. |
| All Final and Non-Final Office Actions for U.S. Appl. No. 15/789,020. |
| All Final and Non-Final Office Actions for U.S. Appl. No. 15/789,030. |
| All Final and Non-Final Office Actions for U.S. Appl. No. 15/789,038. |
| All Final and Non-Final Office Actions for U.S. Appl. No. 15/789,044. |
| All Final and Non-Final Office Actions for U.S. Appl. No. 15/789,081. |
| All Final and Non-Final Office Actions for U.S. Appl. No. 15/789,172. |
| All Final and Non-Final Office Actions for U.S. Appl. No. 15/789,188. |
| All Final and Non-Final Office Actions for U.S. Appl. No. 15/789,208. |
| All Final and Non-final Office Actions for U.S. Appl. No. 15/923,499. |
| All final and non-final office actions for U.S. Appl. No. 15/962,327. |
| All final and non-final office actions for U.S. Appl. No. 15/962,351. |
| All final and non-final office actions for U.S. Appl. No. 16/001,045. |
| All final and non-final office actions for U.S. Appl. No. 16/001,053. |
| All final and non-final office actions for U.S. Appl. No. 16/001,058. |
| All final and non-final office actions for U.S. Appl. No. 16/001,064. |
| All Final and Non-Final Office Actions for U.S. Appl. No. 16/156,015. |
| All Final and Non-Final Office Actions for U.S. Appl. No. 16/156,038. |
| All Final and Non-Final Office Actions for U.S. Appl. No. 16/156,053. |
| All Final and Non-Final Office Actions for U.S. Appl. No. 16/156,066. |
| All Final and Non-Final Office Actions for U.S. Appl. No. 16/156,072. |
| All final and non-final office actions for U.S. Appl. No. 16/165,016. |
| All final and non-final office actions for U.S. Appl. No. 16/165,033. |
| All final and non-final office actions for U.S. Appl. No. 16/165,044. |
| All final and non-final office actions for U.S. Appl. No. 16/170,498. |
| All final and non-final office actions for U.S. Appl. No. 16/170,516. |
| All final and non-final office actions for U.S. Appl. No. 16/170,711. |
| All final and non-final office actions for U.S. Appl. No. 16/226,927. |
| All final and non-final office actions for U.S. Appl. No. 16/248,900. |
| All final and non-final office actions for U.S. Appl. No. 16/285,535. |
| All final and non-final office actions for U.S. Appl. No. 16/376,033. |
| All final and non-final office actions for U.S. Appl. No. 16/390,270. |
| Anonymous: “Merquat Polyquaternium 47 Series, Water Soluble Polymers for Personal Care”, Jul. 30, 2017, URL: https://www.in-cosmetics.com/_novadocuments/2729, retrieved on Dec. 21, 2018. |
| Carbopol Aqua SF-1 Polymer Technical Data Sheet, TDS-294, Dec. 2000. |
| Christensen et al., “Experimental Determination of Bubble Size Distribution in a Water Column by Interferometric Particle Imaging and Telecentric Direct Image Method”, Student Report, Aalborg University, Jun. 3, 2014. |
| Dehyquart Guar: Published Nov. 2010. |
| Hair Care/Conditioning Polymers Differentiation, Anonymous, Feb. 1, 2017, URL: http://www.biochim.it./assets/site/media/allegati/cosmetica/hair-care/tab-merquat-hair-care.pdf, retrieved on Dec. 20, 2018, p. 1. |
| PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2016/028728 dated Aug. 5, 2016. |
| PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2016/028729 dated Jun. 15, 2016. |
| PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2016/028730 dated Aug. 5, 2016. |
| PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2016/028735 dated Jul. 25, 2016. |
| PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2016/028736 dated Jul. 25, 2016. |
| PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2016/028742 dated Jul. 18, 2016. |
| PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2016/058123 dated Dec. 21, 2016. |
| PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2016/066752 dated Feb. 22, 2017. |
| PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2016/066757 dated Feb. 22, 2017. |
| PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2017/020604 dated May 11, 2017. |
| PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2017/022737 dated Jun. 22, 2017. |
| PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2017/057486 dated Jan. 9, 2018. |
| PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2017/057487 dated Dec. 19, 2017. |
| PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2017/057488 dated Dec. 12, 2017. |
| PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2017/057497 dated Jan. 8, 2018. |
| PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2017/057503 dated Dec. 13, 2017. |
| PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2017/057507 dated Dec. 13, 2017. |
| PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2017/057510 dated Jan. 11, 2018. |
| PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2017/057511 dated Feb. 2, 2018. |
| PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2017/057514 dated Jan. 10, 2018. |
| PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2017/057515 dated Dec. 11, 2017. |
| PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2017/057522 dated Feb. 2, 2018. |
| PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2017/057533 dated Jan. 8, 2018. |
| PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2017/057541 dated Dec. 22, 2017. |
| PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2018/029313 dated Jul. 11, 2018. |
| PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2018/029315 dated Jun. 27, 2018. |
| PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2018/036181 dated Aug. 3, 2018. |
| PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2018/036185 dated Aug. 3, 2018. |
| PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2018/055102 dated Jan. 9, 2019. |
| PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2018/055103 dated Jan. 9, 2019. |
| PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2018/055104 dated Jan. 18, 2019. |
| PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2018/055105 dated Jan. 8, 2019. |
| PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2018/055106 dated Jan. 16, 2019. |
| PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2018/055107 dated Jan. 28, 2019. |
| PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2018/056669 dated Jan. 31, 2019. |
| PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2018/056673 dated Feb. 5, 2019. |
| PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2018/056674 dated Feb. 5, 2019. |
| PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2018/057451 dated Feb. 25, 2019. |
| PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2018/057476 dated Jan. 18, 2019. |
| PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2018/066697 dated Mar. 15, 2019. |
| PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2018/066701 dated Mar. 15, 2019. |
| Polyquaternium: “Final Report on the Safety Assessment of the Polyguatemium-10”, Journal of the American College of Toxicology, Jan. 1, 1988, URL: http://www.beauty-review.nl/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/Final-Report-on-theSafety-Assessment-of-Polyguaternium-10.pdf, retrieved on Dec. 20, 2018. |
| Practical Modern Hair Science, Published 2012. |
| S. Herrwerth et al.: “Highly Concentrated Cocamidopropyl Betaine—The Latest Developments for Improved Sustainability and Enhanced Skin Care”, Tenside, Surfactants, Detergents, vol. 45, No. 6, Nov. 1, 2008, pp. 304-308, p. 305—left-hand column. |
| “Deep Image Matting”, Ning Xu et al, Beckman Institute for Advanced Science and Technology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Adobe Research, Mar. 10, 2017. |
| All final and non-final office actions for U.S. Appl. No. 16/532,556 (P&G Case 14973C), See Pair. |
| All final and non-final office actions for U.S. Appl. No. 16/846,594 (P&G Case 14550MC), See Pair. |
| All final and non-final office actions for U.S. Appl. No. 17/071,033 (P&G Case 15069MC), See Pair. |
| D'Souza et al., Shampoo and Conditioners: What a Dermatologist Should Know? Indian J Dermatol, 2015 May-Jun. 50(3), 248-254 (2015). |
| Fevola, Michael J. “Guar Hydroxypropyltrimonium Chloride.” Cosmetics and toiletries 127.1 (2012) 16-21. |
| Inspection certificate for Hostapon® CCG, Clariant lberica Production, SA., May 6, 2019. |
| Medvedev, Diffusion Coefficients in Multicomponent Mixtures, PhD Thesis from Technical University of Denmark, 2005, 181 pages. |
| Musazzi, “Emulsion versus nonoemulsion: how much is the formulative shift critical for a cosmetic product?” (Drug Deliv and Trans. Res. (2018) 8:414-421 (Year: 2018). |
| PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2019/025923 dated Jun. 24, 2019. |
| PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2019/057974 dated Feb. 3, 2020. |
| Perm Inc Diffusion Coefficient: Measurement Techiques, https://perminc.com/resourcesffundamentals-of-fluid-flow-In-porous-media/chapter-3-molecular-diffusion/diffusion-coefficient/measurement-techniques, Oct. 2020_. |
| Product Bulletin, Amphosol® CG, Cocamidopropyl Betaine, Stepan Company, Jun. 2011. |
| Product Data Sheet for Chemoryrm Ls Surfactant, Sodium Lauroyl Sarcosinate, Lubrizol Advanced Materials, Inc., Mar. 24, 2020. |
| Product Data Sheet, Eversonrm UCS-405, Disodium Cocoyl Glutamate (Sodium Cocoyl Glutamate*), Sino Lion USA, Jul. 2018. |
| Product Fact Sheet - Hostapon® Ccg, mild anionic surfactant for the cosmetic industry, Clariant International Ltd., Aug. 2014. |
| Product Fact Sheet, Hostapon® CGN, Mild anionic surfactant for the cosmetic industry, Clariant International Ltd., Jan. 2016. |
| Robinson et al., Final Report of the Amended Safety Assessment of Sodium Laureth Sulfate and Related Salts of SulfatedEthoxylated Alcohols, International Journal of Toxicology 29(Supplement 3) 151S-161S, 2010 (Year 2010). |
| Schaefer, Katie, “Eco-friendly, Non-flammable Liquified Gas Propellant”, https://www.cosmeticsandtoiletries.com/ formulating/function/aids/138418589.html#close-olyticsmodal. Published Jan. 30, 2012. |
| UL Prospector® Product Data Sheet, Plantacare® 818 UP, C8-16 fatty alcohol glucoside, BASF, May 21, 2015. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 17/071,033, dated Oct. 15, 2020, Glenn, Jr. et al. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20190183777 A1 | Jun 2019 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 62608203 | Dec 2017 | US |
