The disclosure of this application is related generally to heavy equipment anchoring systems, and more specifically to a cleat anchoring system that is useful to anchor, for example, a mobile horizontal directional drilling rig.
Mobile horizontal directional drilling (“HDD”) rigs conventionally include a horizontal directional drilling machine pivotally mounted on a tracked vehicle or tractor. Such mobile rigs generally provide a directional drill bit which is “steerable”, and which is mounted on the end of a flexible drill stem. Such a drill is often used for drilling holes, for instance, for installing flexible fiber-optic cable underground, for laying electric cable underground, or similar applications. The fact that the drill is steerable permits a user of the drill to drill under roadways, driveways, sidewalks, and similar, without disrupting the surface. With the conventional drilling machine described above, drilling operations usually are initiated at an angle of approximately 15 degrees to the horizontal. Once the drill bit is underground, it can be steered to drill a passageway of desired azimuth and then withdrawn when the work is completed.
It is necessary to anchor the rig prior to drilling. In addition to drilling torque forces, the drilling operations place push and pull back forces on the rig. These normal drilling forces cause reactionary forces on the rig that urge the rig to uproot or slide along the ground surface, for example. In conventional deployments, an anchor bar extends outwardly from the frame of the tractor and supports anchoring stakes. The anchoring stakes are driven into the support surface in an attempt to stabilize the drilling machine in place during drilling operations.
Larger mobile HDD rigs can deliver over 100,000 pounds of pull back force. Conventional anchoring systems for such larger rigs often further include anchoring piles driven into the ground. The piles may also be cemented. Smaller rigs may be anchored with rotary auger-like stakes driven into the ground with, for example, a hydraulic motor.
A typical anchoring setup has a main body portion which includes a stake-down plate. The stake-down plate is a rectangular metal plate, in which the front and rear long edges of the plate have been bent upwardly to make the stake-down plate have an elongated U-shape in cross-section from front to rear. The stake-down plate has top and bottom smooth surfaces, wherein metal stabilizers are welded to the top surface of the stake-down plate to give it rigidity.
The anchoring assembly also includes stakes which, as noted, can be screwed in or hydraulically driven into the ground or other support surface on which the anchoring assembly is positioned. The stakes may be screwed-in or driven into the support surface so as to be vertical or at an angle to horizontal. The stakes help anchor the anchoring assembly to the support surface in order to resist sliding of the drilling machine during drilling operations.
However, even with the stakes of the stake-down system of the anchoring assembly securely in place in the ground or other support surface, the advancing of the drill bit tends to create a force applied to the drill stem which urges movement of the tracked vehicle drilling machine with respect to the anchoring assembly. Furthermore, when withdrawing the drill bit, there is also a tendency to urge movement of the tracked vehicle drilling machine with respect to the anchoring assembly.
In some drilling applications, it is not possible or desirable to drive the stakes into the ground. The earth may be frozen or there may be electrical cable or similar directly beneath the intended staking location. In these types of situations, the tendency of the drilling machine to slide is particularly troublesome.
The prior art discloses various types of anchoring. U.S. Pat. No. 6,257,350 discloses a multiple-position stake-down assembly positioned beneath the HDD drive head. An anchoring regime is selectable at the stake-down assembly. U.S. Pat. No. 6,131,674 discloses a stake-down assembly positioned beneath the drive head, with additional gripping mechanisms deployed to oppose sliding forces on the stake-down assembly when the HDD rig exerts push and pull back forces. U.S. Pat. No. 5,709,276 discloses a rig anchoring system attached to the front of the rig itself. U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,253,721, 5,231,899 and 4,953,658 disclose conventional stake anchoring systems for smaller rigs. U.S. Pat. No. 4,023,828 discloses a cleat pad for the underneath of outriggers on earthmoving equipment.
All of the foregoing examples of the prior art overlook using the dead weight of the HDD rig itself to hold an anchoring system in the ground. For example, a mobile (track-driven) HDD rig capable of delivering over 100,000 pounds of pull back force may typically have a dead weight of 100,000 pounds itself. It would be advantageous to utilize that dead weight as much as possible to counteract reactionary forces to torque and push/pull back forces encountered during HDD operations. Therefore, there exists a need for an anchoring system that can harness that dead weight and use it to prevent the rig anchors from uprooting or sliding, for example, during push or pull back operations.
The disclosure of this application addresses one or more of the above-described drawbacks of the prior art. Such disclosure includes a cleat anchoring system using the weight of the HDD rig to sit on top of a metal plate with cleats deployed on the underside of the plate. The weight of the rig presses the cleats into the earth and thus discourages the rig from moving or “sliding” in reaction to torsion or pull back forces exerted by the rig during HDD operations. Preferred embodiments deploy cleats in two locations: one in a front position, under the thrust plate (front pad) of the HDD drive, and the other in a rear position under the tracks of the rig. The two sets of cleats, or cleat pads, are joined with connecting rods so that they can act in concert to anchor the HDD rig. In other embodiments, the front and rear cleat pads may be connected with cables or chains. In yet further embodiments, the front and rear cleat pads may be deployed in sections that pin together. In an additional embodiment, a front “bull bar” is also provided attached to the cleat anchoring system, against which the HDD may be braced when reacting to high pull back forces.
It is therefore a technical advantage of the disclosed cleat anchoring system to provide improved anchoring to heavy duty mobile equipment such as an HDD rig. There is a reduced tendency for the HDD rig to uproot or slide, for example, in reaction to torque or push/pull forces exerted during HDD operations.
The disclosed cleat anchoring system, in addition to providing improved anchoring, also provides logistical and environmental advantages over conventional anchoring systems of this type. It is a simple design, enabling rapid set up, tear down and transport from one job to the next. Different sizes and specifications of cleat anchoring systems may easily be devised and customized to suit different types of equipment being used in different anchoring environments. The disclosed cleat anchoring system is much less disruptive to the local earth and soil environment than comparable conventional systems that might require heavy-duty augers and/or cement piles to provide the required anchoring.
A further technical advantage is that setup, use, tear down and transportation of the disclosed cleat anchoring system should provide significant savings of time and money over comparable conventional anchoring systems.
A further technical advantage is increased safety for personnel working in and around the HDD rig.
In another embodiment of the disclosed cleat anchoring system, optional plates may be provided around the front and rear cleat pads, to which the cleat pads may be attached by, for example, conventional bolting. Further side rails may be provided framing the cleat pads. These additional optional plates may allow the disclosed cleat anchoring system also to capture fluids that may issue from the HDD rig, such as hydraulic oil or drilling fluids. Conventionally, a user has to put down tarpaulins or other protection to prevent these fluids from spilling into the soil. A technical advantage of these optional plates is to protect the soils surrounding the HDD rig without having to put down tarpaulins.
The, foregoing has outlined rather broadly the features and technical advantages of the disclosure of this application, in order that the detailed description of the embodiments that follows may be better understood. It will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that the specific embodiments disclosed may be readily utilized as a basis for modifying or designing other structures for carrying out the same general purposes of the material set forth in this disclosure.
For a more complete understanding of embodiments described in detail below, and the advantages thereof, reference is now made to the following drawings, in which:
As further shown on
With continued reference to
In other embodiments (illustrated by example in
It will be thus appreciated from
With reference now to
With momentary reference to
Returning now to
As noted above, the disclosure above with reference to front cleat plate 211 and front cleats 212 on
It will be thus appreciated from
It will also be appreciated that the disclosure above with reference to
It will be further understood that rear cleat pads 203 may be of a unitary design, or of differing designs, per user selection. Rear cleat pads 203 may also be rigidly (but removably) connected across or under tractor 101 in analogous fashion to connecting rods 202 connecting front and rear cleat pads 201 and 203. Rear cleat pads 203 may also, in some embodiments, be a single rear cleat pad 203 spanning the underside of tractor 101 from track 103 to track 103, such as is illustrated on
Looking at all the FIGURES as a whole, an exemplary method for setting up cleat anchoring system 200 would comprise several steps. First, front and rear cleat pads 201 and 203 are laid out to their desired position. Tractor 101 is then reversed up over front cleat pad 201 and on to its rear cleat pads 203. The dead weight of tractor 101 may thus be used to anchor both front and rear cleat pads 201 and 203 into the ground. Tractor 101 and front thrust plate 104 are anchored to their respective cleat pads (rear and front) 203 and 201. In the embodiments of
The cleat anchoring system 200 has been described throughout so far with reference to an HDD rig 100. The cleat anchoring system is not limited in this regard, however, and could be used to stabilize and anchor other equipment, such as, without limitation, auger boring machines, pipe thrusters on pipe line jobs, and in deployments on pipe jacking and recovery situations. A recovery situation might require adding a winch onto the cleat anchoring system.
The variety of applications of the disclosed cleat anchoring system further suggests various alternative embodiments (not illustrated herein). In lighter duty applications, some or all of the connecting rods or cables/chains could be omitted. Alternatively, the front and rear cleat pads may be deployed in sections that pin together. In heavier duty applications, front and rear cleat pads 201 and 203 (as shown on
As also described above in the “Summary” section, a further embodiment of the disclosed cleat anchoring system (not illustrated) may provide optional plates around front and rear cleat pads 201 and 203 (as shown on
Although the inventive material in this disclosure has been described in detail along with some of its technical advantages, it will be understood that various changes, substitutions and alternations may be made to the detailed embodiments without departing from the broader spirit and scope of such inventive material.
This application claims the benefit of, and priority to, commonly-invented and commonly-assigned U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/862,505, filed Aug. 5, 2013.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3930668 | Schuermann et al. | Jan 1976 | A |
4023828 | MacKenzie et al. | May 1977 | A |
4953638 | Dunn | Sep 1990 | A |
5231899 | Lee | Aug 1993 | A |
5253721 | Lee | Oct 1993 | A |
5709276 | Lee | Jan 1998 | A |
6131674 | Draney et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6257350 | Draney et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6276464 | Draney et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6814161 | Draney et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61862505 | Aug 2013 | US |