This Patent Application claims priority from Italian Patent Application No. 102018000010719 filed on Nov. 30, 2018, the entire disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.
The present invention relates to a climbing shoe.
As is known, the currently most popular climbing shoes comprise: a leather and/or fabric shoe-upper that is substantially sock-shaped so as to accommodate and cover the user's foot, including the sole of the foot; a front tensioning band that is made of a high-elasticity elastomeric material, is substantially U-bent, and is fixed to the toe of the shoe-upper by gluing so as to surround the tarsus-phalangeal portion of the user's foot; a rear tensioning band that is made of a high-elasticity elastomeric material, is substantially U-bent, and is fixed by gluing to the rear part of the shoe-upper so as to cover the area above the Calcaneus of the user's foot, and then to extend along the two lateral sides of the shoe-upper up to reach and join the front tensioning band; and a lower sole which is made of a soft and flexible polymeric material with a high friction coefficient and substantially inextensible, and is fixed by gluing to the bottom of the shoe upper, partially overlapping the front and rear tensioning bands, so as to cover the whole of the sole of the user's foot.
Patent EP2274994 additionally describes a climbing shoe provided with an additional tensioning band, again made of a high-elasticity elastomeric material, which is substantially V-shaped and is fixed by gluing to the lower part of the shoe-upper, beneath the sole, so as to cover the bottom of the shoe-upper in the metatarsophalangeal area of the sole of the foot, and then extend along the two lateral sides of the shoe-upper, up to reach and join the rear tensioning band.
Unfortunately, although working very well, the climbing shoe described above has a limited capability to adapt to the morphology of the user's foot with the comfort problems that this entails, and is excessively rigid with the operating limits that this entails.
The climbing shoe described above, in fact, is not very suitable for climbing rock walls that are grade IV or higher.
Aim of the present invention it to provided a climbing shoe which is lighter than those currently in use, and is moreover capable of binding the climber's foot better adapting itself to the morphology of the user's foot, so as to improve the foot-containment capacity of the footwear.
In compliance with these aims, according to the present invention there is provided a climbing shoe as defined in claim 1 and preferably, though not necessarily, in any one of the dependent claims.
The present invention will now be described with reference to the accompanying drawings, which illustrate a non-limiting embodiment thereof, wherein:
With reference to
The climbing shoe 1 basically comprises: a shoe upper preferably made of leather and/or fabric, which is substantially sock-shaped so as to accommodate and completely cover the user's foot, including the sole of the foot; and a front sole 3 that is made of a soft and flexible polymeric material with a high friction coefficient and substantially inextensible, and is firmly fixed to the bottom 4 of the shoe-upper 2 preferably by gluing, so as to cover the front part of the bottom 4 of shoe upper 2.
In more detail, the bottom 4 of shoe-upper 2, i.e. the part/sector of shoe-upper 2 that covers the sole of the user's foot, is longitudinally divided into a front or tarsus-phalangeal portion 4a that is immediately underneath the tarsus-phalangeal region of the sole of the user's foot; a central or plantar-arch portion 4b that is immediately underneath the plantar-arch region; and a rear or talus-calcaneal portion 4c that is immediately underneath the talus-calcaneal region of the sole of the user's foot.
The front sole 3 is preferably shaped/dimensioned so as to substantially cover solely the front or tarsus-phalangeal portion 4a of the bottom 4 of shoe-upper 2.
Preferably, the front sole 3 is moreover made of a polymeric material having a hardness (UNI 4916) preferably lower than 80 Shore A and optionally ranging between 50 and 75 Shore A.
In more detail, in the example shown, the front sole 3 is preferably made of a soft and flexible polymeric material such as, for example, the XS Edge compound or the GRIP 2 compound manufactured by the Italian firm VIBRAM S.P.A.
The climbing shoe 1 additionally comprises a plurality of tensioning bands that are made of a high-elasticity elastomeric material, are preferably pre-tensioned, and are finally firmly fixed to the shoe-upper 2 preferably by gluing, so as to embrace and tighten the shoe upper 2 against the user's foot.
In more detail, each tensioning band has a monolithic structure, and is preferably made of an elastomeric material having an elastic modulus (also known as Young's modulus) significantly lower than that of the polymeric material forming the front sole 3.
In other words, the tensioning bands are preferably made of elastomeric materials having an elastic modulus 2-10 times lower than that of the polymeric material forming the sole 3, and preferably also a hardness (UNI 4916) greater than that of the polymeric material forming the sole 3.
Preferably the tensioning band or bands are moreover pre-tensioned so as to tighten the shoe-upper 2 on the user's foot, to the limit of physical pain.
With reference to
The front tensioning band 5 is substantially U-bent and is firmly fixed to the toe 7 of the shoe-upper 2 preferably by gluing, so as to surround/embrace the front part of the bottom 4 of shoe-upper 2, firmly joining at same time the front sole 3 preferably by gluing.
In more detail, the front tensioning band 5 is firmly fixed to the toe 7 of shoe-upper 2 so as to cover the area of shoe upper 2 that surrounds/flanks the tarsus-phalangeal portion 4a of the bottom 4, preferably also extending on the bottom 4 of shoe-upper 2, underneath the sole 3.
In other words, the lower edge of the front tensioning band 5 extends on the bottom 4 of shoe-upper 2 so as to be at least partially overlapped by the sole 3, and is firmly fixed to the sole 3 preferably by gluing.
Preferably, the front tensioning band 5 moreover extends along the two inner and outer lateral sides of shoe-upper 2, towards the heel portion 8 of shoe-upper 2 (i.e. towards the portion of shoe-upper 2 that covers and protects the Calcaneus of the user's foot), so that the two ends 5a of the band 5 reach and, optionally, also go beyond the boundary line between the tarsus-phalangeal portion 4a and the plantar arch portion 4b of the bottom 4, preferably remaining spaced one from the other.
Moreover, with particular reference to
The front part of the user's foot is thus protected, on the bottom, by the sole 3 and, on top, by the central part of front tensioning band 5.
Preferably, the front tensioning band 5 is finally made of an elastomeric material with a hardness (UNI 4916) greater than or equal to 80 Shore A.
With reference to
Clearly, the two ends 6a of rear tensioning band 6 reach the rear patch 11 from opposite sides of the latter and remain spaced/distanced from each other.
More specifically, the two ends 6a of rear tensioning band 6 are preferably overlapped by the rear patch 11, and are firmly fixed to the rear patch 11 preferably by gluing.
At the overlap points, moreover, the rear tensioning band 6 surmounts and is firmly fixed to the front tensioning band 5 preferably by gluing.
In addition, the central elbow of rear tensioning band 6 is preferably dimensioned so as to also extend within the tarsus-phalangeal portion 4a of the bottom 4 of shoe-upper 2, underneath the front sole 3.
The rear patch 11, on the other hand, is preferably made of a soft and flexible polymeric material that is optionally also substantially inextensible, and is preferably firmly fixed to the rear part of shoe-upper 2 preferably by gluing.
In addition, the rear patch 11 is preferably arranged astride of the midplane M of the shoe, immediately above the heel portion 8 of shoe-upper 2, so as to extend substantially astride the point where the Achilles tendon attaches to the Calcaneus of the user's foot.
The two ends 6a of rear tensioning band 6, therefore, are preferably located on opposite sides of the shoe midplane M.
Preferably, the polymeric material forming the rear patch 11 is moreover less hard than the elastomeric material forming the rear tensioning band 6.
In the example shown, in particular, likewise the front tensioning band 5, the rear tensioning band 6 is preferably made of an elastomeric material having a hardness (UNI 4916) greater than or equal to 80 Shore A.
The rear patch 11, in turn, is preferably made of a soft and flexible polymeric material having a hardness (UNI 4916) lower than 80 Shore A and optionally ranging between 50 and 75 Shore A.
With reference to
In addition, the rear protective sheet 12 is preferably also shaped so as to rise up along the rear part of shoe-upper 2, towards the rear patch 11, while remaining substantially astride the shoe midplane M, so as to also cover the heel portion 8 of shoe-upper 2.
In other words, the rear protective sheet 12 is preferably oblong in shape and is firmly fixed to the shoe-upper 2 so as to cover the rear part of bottom 4 and the heel portion 8.
Preferably, the polymeric material forming the rear protective sheet 12 moreover has a hardness lower than that of the elastomeric material forming the rear tensioning band 6, and optionally also a hardness greater than that of the polymeric material forming the front sole 3.
In more detail, the rear protective sheet 12 is preferably dimensioned so as to cover the talus-calcaneal portion 4c of the bottom 4 of shoe-upper 2, optionally also extending over the plantar-arch portion 4b of the bottom 4 preferably while remaining underneath the rear tensioning band 6.
Preferably the protective sheet 12 is furthermore substantially L-bent and is shaped/dimensioned so as to also cover the heel portion 8 of shoe-upper 2, while remaining spaced from the rear patch 11.
In other words, the rear protective sheet 12 is preferably oblong in shape, and is preferably substantially L-bent so as to cover the talus-calcaneal portion 4c of the bottom 4 and the heel portion 8 of shoe upper 2, while remaining substantially astride of the shoe midplane M.
In the example shown, in particular, the rear protective sheet 12 is preferably made of a polymeric material having a hardness (UNI 4916) preferably lower than 75 Shore A and optionally ranging between 50 and 65 Shore A.
With reference to
The semi-rigid front insert 13 has a plate-like structure that preferably underapproximates the shape of the front sole 3 and is firmly fixed to the bottom 4 of shoe-upper 2, or rather to the tarsus-phalangeal portion 4a of the bottom 4 of shoe-upper 2, underneath the front sole 3 and preferably also underneath the front tensioning band 5 and/or the rear tensioning band 6, so as to stiffen the front part of the climbing shoe 1.
In more detail, the semi-rigid front insert 13 is preferably made of nylon or thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU), and is preferably firmly fixed to the front sole 3 and to the bottom 4 of shoe-upper 2 by gluing.
The semi-rigid rear insert 14, on the other hand, has a ribbon-like structure, is substantially L-bent, and is firmly fixed to the rear part of the bottom 4, or rather on the talus-calcaneal portion 4c of the bottom 4, and to the heel portion 8 of shoe-upper 2, beneath the rear protective sheet 12 and substantially astride the midplane M, so as to stiffen the rear part of the climbing shoe 1.
Similarly to the semi-rigid front insert 13, also the semi-rigid rear insert 14 is preferably made of nylon or thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU), and is preferably firmly fixed to the shoe-upper 2 and to the rear protective sheet 12 by gluing.
The functioning of the climbing shoe 1 is easily inferable from the above description, and does not require further explanation.
The advantages connected to the particular shape and arrangement of the rear tensioning band 6 are remarkable.
First of all, the thus-made rear tensioning band 6 enables the elastic force to be distributed, in the rear part of the shoe, over a wider surface that, in addition, excludes the part of the foot where the Achilles tendon attaches to the Calcaneus, thus noticeably improving the comfort of the fit.
In more detail, the rear tensioning band 6, being interrupted in the area of the foot where the Achilles tendon attaches to the Calcaneus, enables the small rear patch 11 located there to distribute the pressure over a wider area of the foot, with a considerable increase in the shoe's comfort. All this, of course, without compromising in any way the foot-containment capacity of the shoe 1.
In addition, the special shape of the rear tensioning band 6 enables differentiated pre-tensioning of the inner and outer sides of the shoe, making it possible for the climbing shoe 1 to better adapt to the morphology of the user's foot.
Lastly, the climbing shoe 1 is considerably lighter than climbing shoes currently on the market, with all the advantages that this entails.
It is finally clear that modifications and variations may be made to the climbing shoe 1 without thereby departing from the scope of the present invention.
For example, the semi-rigid front insert 13 and/or semi-rigid rear insert 14 may be made of a polymeric material loaded with carbon nanoparticles. Preferably the carbon nanoparticles are moreover graphene particles and/or carbon nanotubes.
In addition, with reference to
In other words, the rear patch 11 can be an extension of the rear protective sheet 12.
Finally, with reference to
The front tensioning band 5 is, thus, designed to form a preferably pre-tensioned, elastic ring that surrounds and tightens the tarsus-phalangeal portion 4a of the bottom 4 of shoe-upper 2.
In more detail, in the example shown, the two ends 5a of the front tensioning band 5 are preferably overlapped and glued one on the other.
Preferably, the two ends 5a of the front tensioning band 5, in addition, connect to each other near the border between the tarsus-phalangeal portion 4a and the plantar arch portion 4b of the bottom 4.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
102018000010719 | Nov 2018 | IT | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4506460 | Rudy | Mar 1985 | A |
5142797 | Cole, III | Sep 1992 | A |
7487604 | Perron, Jr. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7543399 | Kilgore | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7895772 | Mariacher | Mar 2011 | B2 |
9801427 | Mariacher | Oct 2017 | B2 |
20020152642 | Chu | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20130104420 | Heathcote | May 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0933033 | Aug 1999 | EP |
1880622 | Jan 2008 | EP |
2949232 | Dec 2015 | EP |
3387935 | Oct 2018 | EP |
Entry |
---|
Italian Search Report and Written Opinion issued by Ministero dello Sviluppo Economico for Italian Application No. IT201800010719, dated Sep. 23, 2019, pp. 1-7. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200170332 A1 | Jun 2020 | US |