The present invention is generally directed to an apparatus for supporting a person's weight on a tree or pole. More particularly, the invention is directed to a climbing tree stand for aiding a hunter in climbing a tree, and for supporting the hunter above the ground in the tree.
It is well understood by deer hunters that an advantage may be gained by elevating themselves well above the deer, such as up in a tree. When the hunter is in an elevated position, a deer is less likely to see or smell the hunter. The elevated position also gives the hunter a better view of the approaching deer, and often times, a better shooting angle.
Although there are several commercially-available devices that aid a hunter in climbing a tree, and in supporting the hunter while in the tree, these known devices are lacking in several respects. Many of the devices are unsafe, in that they may lose their grip on the tree if the hunter shifts his weight in one direction or another. Many of the devices do not offer the hunter the flexibility of sitting or standing, or of choosing the height of the sitting position relative to the device structure. Most of the devices are unwieldy and difficult to use.
Therefore, what is needed is a climbing tree stand that provides safety, flexibility, and ease of use.
The foregoing and other needs are met by an apparatus for aiding an operator in attaining an elevated position in a tree or the like, and for providing support for the operator while in the elevated position. The apparatus includes an upper support assembly and a lower support assembly. The upper support assembly includes an upper support frame having substantially parallel and opposing first and second upper support arms that are joined to a transverse rail. An upper cantilever frame is rigidly attached near the top of the upper support frame, between and in rear of the first and second upper support arms. Attached to the upper cantilever frame is an upper tree-engagement cleat that is centered between and in rear of the first and second upper support arms. The upper tree-engagement cleat provides for contacting the trunk of the tree at two upper engagement locations.
The upper support assembly also includes an upper tree-engagement strap that attaches at one end to the first upper support arm, wraps around the trunk of the tree, and attaches at the other end to the second upper support arm. When cinched tight, the upper tree-engagement strap pulls the top of the upper support frame toward and adjacent the trunk of the tree, thereby causing the upper support frame to be cantilevered on the upper cantilever frame, such that the bottom portion of the frame is suspended outward from the trunk of the tree.
The upper support assembly further includes a seat that may be attached to the upper support frame in at least two seating positions. In each of the seating positions, the seat is positioned below the upper tree-engagement cleat, such that, when the operator is seated in the seat, the seat supports the operator's weight at a point substantially below the locations where the upper tree-engagement cleat engages the trunk of the tree. In this way, the operator's weight maintains tension on the upper tree-engagement strap and causes the upper tree-engagement cleat to be pressed into the trunk of the tree. Even in situations in which the operator's weight is removed from the seat, such as when the operator stands on the platform of the lower assembly, the cantilevered weight of the upper support assembly keeps the cleat tightly engaged with the trunk of the tree. This prevents the upper assembly from inadvertently sliding down or shifting on the tree.
The lower support assembly, which is positioned on the tree below the upper support assembly, includes a lower support frame having substantially parallel and opposing first and second lower support arms joined to a transverse platform. The transverse platform is disposed between the first and second lower support arms, and near the bottom of the lower support frame. A lower cantilever frame is rigidly attached near the top of the lower support frame, between and in rear of the first and second lower support arms. A lower tree-engagement cleat, which is rigidly attached to the lower cantilever frame and substantially centered between and in rear of the first and second lower support arms, contacts the trunk of the tree at two lower tree-engagement locations.
A lower tree-engagement strap attaches at one end to the first lower support arm, wraps around the trunk of the tree, and attaches at the other end to the second lower support arm. When cinched tightly, the lower tree-engagement strap pulls the top of the lower support frame toward and adjacent the trunk of the tree, thereby causing the lower support frame to be cantilevered on the lower cantilever frame, such that the transverse platform is suspended outward and away from the trunk of the tree.
When the operator stands on the transverse platform, the transverse platform supports the operator's weight at a point substantially below the two lower engagement locations where the lower tree-engagement cleat engages the trunk of the tree. In this manner, the operator's weight on the transverse platform maintains tension on the lower tree-engagement strap and causes the lower tree-engagement cleat to be firmly pressed into the trunk of the tree. Even when the operator's weight is removed from the platform, such as when the operator sits in the seat, the cantilevered weight of the lower support frame and platform keep the cleat tightly engaged with the trunk of the tree. This prevents the lower assembly from inadvertently sliding down or shifting on the tree when the operator sits in the seat.
In preferred embodiments, the seat may be attached to the upper support frame in upper and lower seating positions. In the upper seating position, the seat is positioned above the transverse rail, thereby providing an optimum position for bow hunting. In the lower seating position, the seat is positioned below the transverse rail, which provides an optimum position for gun hunting.
In some preferred embodiments, apparatus may be converted into a game cart by attaching the top portion of the upper support frame to the top portion of the lower support frame. The transverse rail serves as a handle for lifting and pulling the game cart as a pair of wheels on the transverse platform rotate in contact with the ground.
Further advantages of the invention will become apparent by reference to the detailed description of preferred embodiments when considered in conjunction with the drawings, which are not to scale, wherein like reference characters designate like or similar elements throughout the several drawings as follows:
Shown in
The upper support assembly 100 generally comprises an upper support frame 102, an upper cantilever frame 104, an upper tree-engagement cleat 106, and an upper tree-engagement strap 108. The upper support frame 102 includes a pair of substantially parallel support arms 110a and 110b, which are also referred to herein as the upper support arms 110a and 110b. At a lower extremity of the frame 102, the upper support arms 110a and 110b preferably transition into a transverse rail 114. In the preferred embodiment of the invention, the upper support arms 110a and 110b are disposed in a plane that forms an angle of approximately 40 to 50 degrees, most preferably 45 degrees, with a plane containing the rail 114. In other words, the angle between the upper support arms 110a and 110b and the rail 114 is approximately 130 to 140 degrees, and most preferably 135 degrees. This angular relationship between the rail 114 and the arms 110a and 110b is most clearly represented in the side elevation view of
Preferably, the upper support frame 102, including the arms 110a and 10b and the rail 114, is formed from a single length of one-inch square steel tubing, with the arms 110a and 110b making a gradual transition into the rail 114. This one-piece construction of the frame 102 eliminates structural failure modes, thereby enhancing the overall safety of the stand 10.
As shown in
At the upper extremity of the upper support frame 102, the upper tree-engagement strap 108 is attached at one end to the arm 110a, is wrapped around the trunk of the tree 12, and is attached at its other end to the arm 110b. In the preferred embodiment of the invention, the strap 108 comprises a 3/16 inch stranded metal cable, such as may be used in aircraft control systems, covered by flexible tubing, such as nylon tubing. In an alternative embodiment, the upper strap 108 (and a lower strap 208 described below) comprises a flexible steel band instead of a cable. Thus, one skilled in the art will appreciate that the invention is not limited to any particular material used in forming the straps 108 and 208, as long as the chosen material can handle the structural load.
In the preferred embodiment, at each end of the strap 108, the cable is formed into a loop which may be inserted into the open end of the tubing of the support arm 110a and 110b. Each end of the cable is inserted into the open end of the corresponding support arm 110a and 10b to a desired depth, and a locking pin 149 is inserted through one of several holes 160 in the arm 110a and the holes 162 in the arm 110b to engage the loops at the ends of the cable.
As shown in
As shown in
The tree-engagement cleat 106 of the preferred embodiment consists of two steel plates, each approximately 7 inches long by 1.5 inches wide by ⅛ inch thick. The cleat plates are welded to the lower brace 116 to form a V. The V shape of the cleat 106 ensures that the cleat 106 engages the trunk of the tree 12 in at least two locations. This arrangement provides much greater stability than can be attained with a single point of contact. It should be appreciated that the scope of the invention is not limited to the form of the cleat 106. Although the preferred embodiment comprises plates, the cleat 106 could also comprise spikes, stakes, studs, or other such devices for firmly engaging the trunk of the tree 12.
As depicted in
The lower support assembly 200 generally comprises a lower support frame 202, a lower cantilever frame 204, a lower tree-engagement cleat 206, and a lower tree-engagement strap 208. The lower support frame 202 includes a pair of substantially parallel support arms 210a and 210b, which are also referred to herein as the lower support arms 210a and 210b. At a lower extremity of the frame 202, the lower support arms 210a and 210b preferably transition into a transverse platform, generally indicated at 214. In the preferred embodiment of the invention, the lower support arms 210a and 210b are disposed in a plane that forms an angle of approximately 40 to 50 degrees, most preferably 45 degrees, with a plane containing the platform 214. In other words, the angle between the lower support arms 210a and 210b and the platform 214 is approximately 130 to 140 degrees, and most preferably about 135 degrees.
Preferably, the lower support frame 202, including the arms 210a and 210b, and the outer frame 213 of the platform 214, are formed from a single length of one-inch square steel tubing. As with the upper frame 102, this one-piece construction of the lower frame 202 eliminates structural failure modes, thereby enhancing the overall safety of the stand 10. This design is especially advantageous in the lower frame 202, since the weight of the operator is supported completely on the platform 214 when the operator is in a standing position and when the operator is using the stand 10 to climb the tree 12.
As shown in
In an alternative embodiment, as depicted in
With reference to
At the upper extremity of the lower support frame 202, the lower tree-engagement strap 208 is attached at one end to the arm 210a, is wrapped around the trunk of the tree 12, and is attached at its other end to the arm 210b. In the preferred embodiment of the invention, the strap 208 is of identical construction as the upper strap 108 described above, and attaches to the support arms 210a and 210b in the same way. Preferably, the lower frame 202 includes adjustment holes 260 on the arm 210a and holes 262 on the arm 210b to provide for strap length adjustment and frame leveling as described above.
As shown in
The lower tree-engagement cleat 206 of the preferred embodiment consists of two steel plates, and has the same construction as that described above for the upper cleat 106.
As depicted in
In a preferred embodiment of the invention as depicted in
As shown in
The dual-position seating feature of the present invention provides a level of versatility not previously available in climbing tree stands. No prior stand has provided one seating position best suited for bow-hunting and another seating position best suited for gun hunting. Thus, the dual-position seating feature of the present invention offers a significant advantage over prior tree stands.
Further, in most prior climbing tree stands, the lower section has been used only to facilitate climbing, and has had little use while the operator is seated in the upper section. In contrast, with the present invention, the platform 214 of the lower assembly 200 provides a place for the operator to stand while hunting. Thus, the operator has a choice of three hunting positions: (1) standing on the platform 214, (2) sitting in the seat assembly 300 in the bow-hunting position, or (3) sitting in the seat assembly 300 in the gun-hunting position. This level of versatility is unavailable in existing tree stands.
As shown in
When in the upper seating position, as shown in
As depicted in
The tree stand 10 is used to climb the tree 12 as follows. First, the upper and lower assemblies 100 and 200 are attached to the trunk of the tree 12 as shown in
It is contemplated, and will be apparent to those skilled in the art from the preceding description and the accompanying drawings that modifications and/or changes may be made in the embodiments of the invention. For example, although the preferred material for many of the load-bearing structures in the stand 10 is steel, other materials could be used, such as aluminum or other metals or alloys, or composite materials, including carbon fiber materials. Further, although the preferred method of attaching together metal members of the structure is by welding, one skilled in the art will appreciate that other means of fastening may also be employed. It should also be appreciated that the upper and lower support assemblies 100 and 200 could be constructed as unitary structures using molding techniques, such as composite molding. Thus, the invention is not limited to any particular type of material or construction technique. Accordingly, it is expressly intended that the foregoing description and the accompanying drawings are illustrative of preferred embodiments only, not limiting thereto, and that the true spirit and scope of the present invention be determined by reference to the appended claims.
This application is a continuation of patent application Ser. No. 09/687,756 filed Oct. 13, 2000 entitled CLIMBING TREE STAND which issued as U.S. Pat. No. 6,481,529 on Nov. 19, 2002.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3352379 | Riggs | Nov 1967 | A |
3419108 | Mobbs | Dec 1968 | A |
3460649 | Baker et al. | Aug 1969 | A |
3856111 | Baker | Dec 1974 | A |
3871482 | Southard | Mar 1975 | A |
3944022 | Ming | Mar 1976 | A |
3955645 | Dye | May 1976 | A |
3960240 | Cotton | Jun 1976 | A |
4022292 | Van Gompel | May 1977 | A |
4120379 | Carter | Oct 1978 | A |
4137995 | Fonte | Feb 1979 | A |
4150733 | Plummer | Apr 1979 | A |
4168765 | Ferguson et al. | Sep 1979 | A |
4230203 | Sweat et al. | Oct 1980 | A |
4316526 | Amacker | Feb 1982 | A |
4321982 | Strickland | Mar 1982 | A |
4331216 | Amacker | May 1982 | A |
4337844 | Hice, Sr. | Jul 1982 | A |
4362307 | Nakatani | Dec 1982 | A |
4369858 | Babb | Jan 1983 | A |
4411335 | Forrester | Oct 1983 | A |
4417645 | Untz | Nov 1983 | A |
4427092 | Tentler | Jan 1984 | A |
4428459 | Peck | Jan 1984 | A |
4452338 | Untz | Jun 1984 | A |
4475627 | Eastridge | Oct 1984 | A |
4488620 | Gibson | Dec 1984 | A |
4549633 | Merritt | Oct 1985 | A |
4582165 | Latini | Apr 1986 | A |
4589522 | Shelton | May 1986 | A |
4597473 | Peck | Jul 1986 | A |
4722421 | Hilbert | Feb 1988 | A |
4726447 | Gibson et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
4784239 | Kirkman | Nov 1988 | A |
4802552 | Williams | Feb 1989 | A |
4809815 | Wallace | Mar 1989 | A |
4819763 | Grote | Apr 1989 | A |
4890694 | Williams | Jan 1990 | A |
4909353 | Govin et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4936415 | Williams | Jun 1990 | A |
4942942 | Bradley | Jul 1990 | A |
4953662 | Porter | Sep 1990 | A |
4989766 | Lewallyn et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
4995475 | Berkbuegler | Feb 1991 | A |
5052516 | Jamieson | Oct 1991 | A |
5086874 | Treants | Feb 1992 | A |
5090504 | Amacker | Feb 1992 | A |
5090505 | Amacker | Feb 1992 | A |
5090506 | Womack et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5101933 | Huntley | Apr 1992 | A |
5101934 | Zumbro | Apr 1992 | A |
5103935 | Amacker | Apr 1992 | A |
5143177 | Smith | Sep 1992 | A |
5156236 | Gardner et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5167298 | Porter | Dec 1992 | A |
5257677 | Stepp | Nov 1993 | A |
5265780 | Matthews et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5433291 | Shoestock, Sr. | Jul 1995 | A |
5492196 | Michno | Feb 1996 | A |
5588499 | Carriere | Dec 1996 | A |
5624008 | Beardslee, Jr. | Apr 1997 | A |
5887676 | Harbin | Mar 1999 | A |
5921348 | Louk et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5971104 | Woller | Oct 1999 | A |
5975242 | Woller et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5979603 | Woller | Nov 1999 | A |
6308800 | Graham, Jr. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20030029671 A1 | Feb 2003 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 09687756 | Oct 2000 | US |
Child | 10262373 | US |